Upload
tiana-relph
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Overview• History of the PDWG• Three Steps to Renewable
Water–Efficient Use–Sustainable Use–Reliable Use
• Conclusions
Palmer Divide Water Group
• Why?: Individual Members are too small to finance and construct a water import project
• In 2003 PDWG began to:– Recruit Additional Members– Explore Alternatives for Organization– Protect Potential Sources– Study New Water Sources
Palmer Divide Water Group
PalmerDivide Water Group
Palmer Divide Water Group
Front Range Water Conservation District
Second Regular SessionSixty-fourth General Assembly
STATE OF COLORADO
INTRODUCED SENATE BILL 04-232
Senate Committees House CommitteesState Veterans & Military Affairs
A BILL FOR AN ACTCONCERNING CREATION OF A FRONT RANGE WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Bill SummaryCreates the front range water conservation district in Arapahoe, Jefferson,
Douglas, Elbert, and northern El Paso counties. Allows cities, towns, and water providers …
Palmer Divide Water Group
• Gunnison River
-Black Canyon
-Aspinall EIS
-Water Workshop
$50,000 Boyle Study with 3:2 Match of Dollars from CWCB
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time in Future (Years)
Sto
rage
(A
F)
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Dem
and
or W
ell C
apac
ity
(AF/
Y)
Storage
PDWG Demand
Installed Well Capacity
Lincoln R. & PS
Full Collection &Conveyance System
Install ½ Wells Install ½ Wells
Crowfoot R. & PS
Approximate Construction Sequence
Capacity Exceeds PDWG Demand
Task 4 – Project Timeline
Boyle Study Conclusions
• Expensive: $200million or $10,000/af (with storage)
•Perhaps only one well field left
•Mined water
•Water Rights are all Privately Held
Palmer Divide Water Group (N. El Paso Only)10k AF Wellfield + 5k AF Operational Storage at Lincoln South
Capital Cost: $63 million
Wells: $30,900,000
Conveyance: $17,400,000
Storage: $14,500,000
Yield: 10,000 AF/Y
Unit Cost: $6,300/AF
Annual O&M Cost: $200,000
Palmer Divide Water Group
El Paso County Water Authority
•Lobby the General Assembly on Water Matters
•Facilitate Regional Initiatives
•Active Participation in the Statewide Water Supply Initiative (SWASI)
46
Surface WaterStorage
SatelliteWell Field
P
Pumpingto Ditches
Pip
eline
Ditches used assource of supply
FallowedLands
AlternativesDevelopment
Statewide Water Supply Initiative
Satellitewellfield
NorthernProviders
ColoradoSpringsUtilities
Trans-mountainWater
System Interconnect (As Customers)Dry Years - Delivery from Denver Basin;Wet Years - Delivery to ProvidersEvery Year - Delivery of Denver Basin Return Flow
Recharge theBlack Squirrel Groundwater
Basin
Treated Effluent & Wet Year Water
Dry Year Recovery
SDS
EPCWA Participation in CapacityWithout Penalty
Pipe
SouthernProviders
Cherokee &Eastern Providers
Alternate Pipeline; Rotating Fallowing of Agriculture
Treated Effluent
DRAFT
• Where are we now?
–Shift to a Local Focus
–Public Information Campaign
–Active Lobbying of General Assembly
Palmer Divide Water Group
Three Steps to Renewable Water
• Efficient Use
• Sustainable Use
• Reliable Use
• Transit Loss Study under EPCWA
• Interconnection of Potable Systems
• Public Safety–Firefighting
–Emergency Backup
Efficient Use
• Stretch Existing Supplies by:–Mining Other Parts of the
Aquifer
–Buy Renewable Water Colorado Springs Utilities
Sustainable Use
Satellitewellfield
NorthernProviders
ColoradoSpringsUtilities
Trans-mountainWater
System Interconnect (As Customers)Dry Years - Delivery from Denver Basin;Wet Years - Delivery to ProvidersEvery Year - Delivery of Denver Basin Return Flow
Recharge theBlack Squirrel Groundwater
Basin
Treated Effluent & Wet Year Water
Dry Year Recovery
SDS
EPCWA Participation in CapacityWithout Penalty
Pipe
SouthernProviders
Cherokee &Eastern Providers
Alternate Pipeline; Rotating Fallowing of Agriculture
Treated Effluent
DRAFT
• Is Colorado Springs receptive? –Policy Governance
–“So Long As”
Sustainable Use
• The Southern Delivery System Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is an opportunity
Sustainable Use
Reliable Use
• A Renewable Water System includes:– Tributary Water Rights– Delivery/Carry Over Storage– Conveyance Infrastructure– Terminal Storage– Treatment– Potable Distribution
Reliable Use
Reliable Use
• February, 2003 Report suggested two sources:–Gunnison River
–Agricultural Transfers
Renewable Water
46
Surface WaterStorage
SatelliteWell Field
P
Pumpingto Ditches
Pip
eline
Ditches used assource of supply
FallowedLands
AlternativesDevelopment
Renewable Water
• Delivery Storage–Brush Hollow Reservoir
–Cooperation with Upper Arkansas Water Conservancy District
Renewable Water
• Terminal Storage:–Recharge the Black Squirrel
Closed Groundwater Basin
–Forest Lakes
Renewable Water
Satellitewellfield
NorthernProviders
ColoradoSpringsUtilities
Trans-mountainWater
System Interconnect (As Customers)Dry Years - Delivery from Denver Basin;Wet Years - Delivery to ProvidersEvery Year - Delivery of Denver Basin Return Flow
Recharge theBlack Squirrel Groundwater
Basin
Treated Effluent & Wet Year Water
Dry Year Recovery
SDS
EPCWA Participation in CapacityWithout Penalty
Pipe
SouthernProviders
Cherokee &Eastern Providers
Alternate Pipeline; Rotating Fallowing of Agriculture
Treated Effluent
DRAFT
1. The Palmer Divide Water Group needs Colorado Springs Utilities much more than CSU needs PDWG.
2. Even at full build-out, the PDWG rate base is too small to finance a renewable water import project on tap fees and water rates alone.
3. The PDWG must compete for renewable water.
4. Becoming part of a Water Conservation District would make PDWG a stronger competitor.
5. First, we must use our local water efficiently.
6. Storage is important.
7. The time to buy renewable water is now.
8. We may need a private sector partner.
Triview