30
Frequencies Frequency Table Umur 17 43.6 43.6 43.6 22 56.4 56.4 100.0 39 100.0 100.0 10 11 Total Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Jenis kelamin 19 48.7 48.7 48.7 20 51.3 51.3 100.0 39 100.0 100.0 Laki-laki Perempuan Total Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Output rtui

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

gdhjfjh

Citation preview

Page 1: Output rtui

Frequencies

Frequency Table

Umur

17 43.6 43.6 43.622 56.4 56.4 100.039 100.0 100.0

1011Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Jenis kelamin

19 48.7 48.7 48.720 51.3 51.3 100.039 100.0 100.0

Laki-lakiPerempuanTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Page 2: Output rtui

Anak ke

25 64.1 64.1 64.111 28.2 28.2 92.32 5.1 5.1 97.41 2.6 2.6 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

1234Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Pendidikan ayah

3 7.7 7.7 7.716 41.0 41.0 48.72 5.1 5.1 53.8

10 25.6 25.6 79.55 12.8 12.8 92.33 7.7 7.7 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

SMPSMAD3S1S2S3Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Page 3: Output rtui

Pendidikan ibu

2 5.1 5.1 5.17 17.9 17.9 23.1

13 33.3 33.3 56.42 5.1 5.1 61.5

13 33.3 33.3 94.91 2.6 2.6 97.41 2.6 2.6 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

SDSMPSMAD3S1S2S3Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Pekerjaan ayah

23 59.0 59.0 59.07 17.9 17.9 76.99 23.1 23.1 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

SwastaWiraswastaPNSTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Page 4: Output rtui

Pekerjaan ibu

12 30.8 30.8 30.812 30.8 30.8 61.56 15.4 15.4 76.99 23.1 23.1 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

IRTSwastaWiraswastaPNSTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Absensi

10 25.6 25.6 25.68 20.5 20.5 46.27 17.9 17.9 64.14 10.3 10.3 74.41 2.6 2.6 76.94 10.3 10.3 87.21 2.6 2.6 89.71 2.6 2.6 92.31 2.6 2.6 94.91 2.6 2.6 97.41 2.6 2.6 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

0123456891011Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Page 5: Output rtui

Nilai raport

23 59.0 59.0 59.016 41.0 41.0 100.039 100.0 100.0

BaikKurangTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Total difficulties score

29 74.4 74.4 74.42 5.1 5.1 79.58 20.5 20.5 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

NormalBorderlineAbnormalTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Emotional

36 92.3 92.3 92.33 7.7 7.7 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

NormalBorderlineTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Page 6: Output rtui

Conduct problems

34 87.2 87.2 87.23 7.7 7.7 94.92 5.1 5.1 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

NormalBorderlineAbnormalTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Hyperactivity

32 82.1 82.1 82.15 12.8 12.8 94.92 5.1 5.1 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

NormalBorderlineAbnormalTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Page 7: Output rtui

Peer problems

31 79.5 79.5 79.57 17.9 17.9 97.41 2.6 2.6 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

NormalBorderlineAbnormalTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Prosocial behavior score

31 79.5 79.5 79.51 2.6 2.6 82.17 17.9 17.9 100.0

39 100.0 100.0

NormalBorderlineAbnormalTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Page 8: Output rtui
Page 9: Output rtui

Crosstabs

Total difficulties score * Nilai raport

Crosstab

19 10 2917.1 11.9 29.0

48.7% 25.6% 74.4%1 1 2

1.2 .8 2.02.6% 2.6% 5.1%

3 5 84.7 3.3 8.0

7.7% 12.8% 20.5%23 16 39

23.0 16.0 39.059.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Total difficultiesscore

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.104a 2 .3492.082 2 .353

2.049 1 .152

39

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .82.

a.

Page 10: Output rtui

Emotional * Nilai raport

Crosstab

21 15 3621.2 14.8 36.0

53.8% 38.5% 92.3%2 1 3

1.8 1.2 3.05.1% 2.6% 7.7%

23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0

59.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline

Emotional

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.079b 1 .778

.000 1 1.000

.081 1 .7761.000 .637

.077 1 .781

39

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.23.

b.

Page 11: Output rtui

Conduct problems * Nilai raport

Crosstab

22 12 3420.1 13.9 34.0

56.4% 30.8% 87.2%1 2 3

1.8 1.2 3.02.6% 5.1% 7.7%

0 2 21.2 .8 2.0

.0% 5.1% 5.1%23 16 39

23.0 16.0 39.059.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Conductproblems

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.152a 2 .1254.834 2 .089

4.045 1 .044

39

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .82.

a.

Page 12: Output rtui

Hyperactivity * Nilai raport

Crosstab

22 10 3218.9 13.1 32.0

56.4% 25.6% 82.1%1 4 5

2.9 2.1 5.02.6% 10.3% 12.8%

0 2 21.2 .8 2.0

.0% 5.1% 5.1%23 16 39

23.0 16.0 39.059.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Hyperactivity

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7.278a 2 .0268.049 2 .018

6.841 1 .009

39

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .82.

a.

Page 13: Output rtui

Peer problems * Nilai raport

Crosstab

21 10 3118.3 12.7 31.0

53.8% 25.6% 79.5%1 6 7

4.1 2.9 7.02.6% 15.4% 17.9%

1 0 1.6 .4 1.0

2.6% .0% 2.6%23 16 39

23.0 16.0 39.059.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Peerproblems

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7.459a 2 .0248.075 2 .018

2.403 1 .121

39

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .41.

a.

Page 14: Output rtui

Prosocial behavior score * Nilai raport

Crosstab

21 10 3118.3 12.7 31.0

53.8% 25.6% 79.5%1 0 1

.6 .4 1.02.6% .0% 2.6%

1 6 74.1 2.9 7.0

2.6% 15.4% 17.9%23 16 39

23.0 16.0 39.059.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Prosocialbehaviorscore

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7.459a 2 .0248.075 2 .018

5.925 1 .015

39

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .41.

a.

Page 15: Output rtui

Crosstabs

Total difficulties score (gabungan) * Nilai raport

Crosstab

19 10 2917.1 11.9 29.0

48.7% 25.6% 74.4%4 6 10

5.9 4.1 10.010.3% 15.4% 25.6%

23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0

59.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline/Abnormal

Total difficulties score(gabungan)

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.001b 1 .1571.085 1 .2971.979 1 .159

.264 .149

1.950 1 .163

39

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.10.

b.

Symmetric Measures

.221 .15739

Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases

Value Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Page 16: Output rtui

Risk Estimate

2.850 .650 12.505

1.638 .733 3.659

.575 .282 1.172

39

Odds Ratio for Totaldifficulties score(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Nilai raport= BaikFor cohort Nilai raport= KurangN of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper

95% ConfidenceInterval

Page 17: Output rtui

Conduct problems (gabungan) * Nilai raport

Crosstab

22 12 3420.1 13.9 34.0

56.4% 30.8% 87.2%1 4 5

2.9 2.1 5.02.6% 10.3% 12.8%

23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0

59.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline/Abnormal

Conduct problems(gabungan)

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

3.601b 1 .0581.990 1 .1583.649 1 .056

.139 .080

3.508 1 .061

39

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.05.

b.

Symmetric Measures

.291 .05839

Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases

Value Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Page 18: Output rtui

Risk Estimate

7.333 .734 73.248

3.235 .551 19.004

.441 .235 .830

39

Odds Ratio forConduct problems(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Nilai raport= BaikFor cohort Nilai raport= KurangN of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper

95% ConfidenceInterval

Page 19: Output rtui

Hyperactivity (gabungan) * Nilai raport

Crosstab

22 10 3218.9 13.1 32.0

56.4% 25.6% 82.1%1 6 7

4.1 2.9 7.02.6% 15.4% 17.9%

23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0

59.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline/Abnormal

Hyperactivity(gabungan)

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7.042b 1 .0084.971 1 .0267.311 1 .007

.013 .013

6.861 1 .009

39

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.87.

b.

Symmetric Measures

.391 .00839

Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases

Value Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Page 20: Output rtui

Risk Estimate

13.200 1.398 124.626

4.813 .772 29.987

.365 .201 .662

39

Odds Ratio forHyperactivity(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Nilai raport= BaikFor cohort Nilai raport= KurangN of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper

95% ConfidenceInterval

Page 21: Output rtui

Peer problems (gabungan) * Nilai raport

Crosstab

21 10 3118.3 12.7 31.0

53.8% 25.6% 79.5%2 6 8

4.7 3.3 8.05.1% 15.4% 20.5%

23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0

59.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline/Abnormal

Peer problems(gabungan)

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.801b 1 .0283.197 1 .0744.819 1 .028

.045 .037

4.678 1 .031

39

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.28.

b.

Symmetric Measures

.331 .02839

Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases

Value Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Page 22: Output rtui

Risk Estimate

6.300 1.075 36.936

2.710 .796 9.220

.430 .225 .822

39

Odds Ratio for Peerproblems(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Nilai raport= BaikFor cohort Nilai raport= KurangN of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper

95% ConfidenceInterval

Page 23: Output rtui

Prosocial behavior score (gabungan) * Nilai raport

Crosstab

21 10 3118.3 12.7 31.0

53.8% 25.6% 79.5%2 6 8

4.7 3.3 8.05.1% 15.4% 20.5%

23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0

59.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline/Abnormal

Prosocial behaviorscore (gabungan)

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

4.801b 1 .0283.197 1 .0744.819 1 .028

.045 .037

4.678 1 .031

39

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.28.

b.

Symmetric Measures

.331 .02839

Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases

Value Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Page 24: Output rtui

Risk Estimate

6.300 1.075 36.936

2.710 .796 9.220

.430 .225 .822

39

Odds Ratio for Prosocialbehavior score(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Nilai raport =BaikFor cohort Nilai raport =KurangN of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper

95% ConfidenceInterval

Page 25: Output rtui

Crosstabs

Jenis kelamin * Nilai raport Crosstabulation

7 12 1911.2 7.8 19.0

17.9% 30.8% 48.7%16 4 20

11.8 8.2 20.041.0% 10.3% 51.3%

23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0

59.0% 41.0% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Laki-laki

Perempuan

Jenis kelamin

Total

Baik KurangNilai raport

Total

Chi-Square Tests

7.501b 1 .0065.823 1 .0167.778 1 .005

.010 .007

7.309 1 .007

39

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.79.

b.

Symmetric Measures

.402 .00639

Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases

Value Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Page 26: Output rtui

Risk Estimate

.146 .035 .615

.461 .246 .863

3.158 1.232 8.095

39

Odds Ratio for Jeniskelamin (Laki-laki /Perempuan)For cohort Nilairaport = BaikFor cohort Nilairaport = KurangN of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper

95% ConfidenceInterval

Page 27: Output rtui

Crosstabs

Total difficulties score * Jenis kelamin Crosstabulation

16 13 2914.1 14.9 29.0

41.0% 33.3% 74.4%0 2 2

1.0 1.0 2.0.0% 5.1% 5.1%

3 5 83.9 4.1 8.0

7.7% 12.8% 20.5%19 20 39

19.0 20.0 39.048.7% 51.3% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline

Abnormal

Total difficultiesscore

Total

Laki-laki PerempuanJenis kelamin

Total

Chi-Square Tests

2.787a 2 .2483.563 2 .168

1.164 1 .281

39

Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .97.

a.

Symmetric Measures

.258 .24839

Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases

Value Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Page 28: Output rtui

Crosstabs

Total difficulties score (gabungan) * Jenis kelamin Crosstabulation

16 13 2914.1 14.9 29.0

41.0% 33.3% 74.4%3 7 10

4.9 5.1 10.07.7% 17.9% 25.6%

19 20 3919.0 20.0 39.0

48.7% 51.3% 100.0%

CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total

Normal

Borderline/Abnormal

Total difficulties score(gabungan)

Total

Laki-laki PerempuanJenis kelamin

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.886b 1 .1701.013 1 .3141.931 1 .165

.273 .157

1.838 1 .175

39

Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona

Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases

Value dfAsymp. Sig.

(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

Exact Sig.(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.

1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.87.

b.

Symmetric Measures

.215 .17039

Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases

Value Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

Page 29: Output rtui

Risk Estimate

2.872 .617 13.366

1.839 .675 5.009

.640 .361 1.135

39

Odds Ratio for Totaldifficulties score(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Jeniskelamin = Laki-lakiFor cohort Jeniskelamin = PerempuanN of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper

95% ConfidenceInterval