Upload
trinhphuc
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
23/11/00 Repli0011 1
Measuring Size, Shape andPosition of Pits and Grooves
Donald A. Chernoff and David L. BurkheadAdvanced Surface Microscopy Inc.
Indianapolis, IN USA
23/11/00 Repli0011 2
Outline◆ Why make Physical Measurements of
Pits and Grooves?◆ Pit Geometry and Jitter (DVD-ROM)◆ Groove Geometry (CD-R)◆ Track centering in
complex headers (M-O)◆ Wobble groove amplitude (DVD+RW,
CD-R)
2
23/11/00 Repli0011 3
DVD = NanoTechnology◆ Feature Size:
400 nm L x 320 nm W x 120 nm H◆ Track Pitch: 740 nm
Mean +/- 10Range 710-770
◆ Jitter: 8% = 11 nm◆ Nanometer Manufacturing needs
Nanometer Inspection Tools
23/11/00 Repli0011 4
Scanning Probe Microscope
3
23/11/00 Repli0011 5
Atomic Force Microscope
23/11/00 Repli0011 6
Probes
4
23/11/00 Repli0011 7
DiscTrack Plus makes AFM more Powerful
◆ AFM = Atomic Force Microscope◆ AFM gives 3-Dimensional Images of
individual pits◆ AFM is used at many Disc companies◆ Root Cause Analysis◆ Correlation of Dimensions
23/11/00 Repli0011 8
Plowing Marks (“clouds”)
5
23/11/00 Repli0011 9
Process Optimization
ProductionVariables
PitGeometry
ElectricalPerformance
◆ Indirect Control Using Disc Analyzer
Pit Geometry is a hidden variable
23/11/00 Repli0011 10
Process Optimization
ProductionVariables
PitGeometry
ElectricalPerformance
◆ DiscTrack Plus provides missing link
Causes and Effects of Pit Geometrycan now be Examined
6
23/11/00 Repli0011 11
Data Analysis◆ Old Method
– Built-in Tools◆ New Method
– Add-on Tools:DiscTrack PlusTM
– Patented
23/11/00 Repli0011 12
Old Method◆ Height 149 nm◆ Width 335 nm◆ Pitch 1481/2
= 740 nm
7
23/11/00 Repli0011 13
Method Characteristics: Old New
◆ Quick, easyfor singlemeasurements
◆ Imprecise (1 pixel)◆ Inaccurate (up to
5% error)◆ Slow, tedious
for manymeasurements
◆ Find FeaturesAutomatically
◆ Sub-Pixel Precision◆ Detect, correct
measurement errors(to 0.3% accuracy)
◆ Measure 100s ofFeatures Easily
23/11/00 Repli0011 14
Mental State vs.Measurement Number
Manual Automatic
10
100
10000
100000
8
23/11/00 Repli0011 15
Automated measurementwithout calibration correction
300
350
400
450
500
300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500
Length at Threshold (nm)
Wid
th a
t Thr
esho
ld (n
m)
23/11/00 Repli0011 16
Automated measurementwith calibration correction
300
350
400
450
500
300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500
Length at Threshold (nm)
Wid
th a
t Thr
esho
ld (n
m)
9
23/11/00 Repli0011 17
Mean values of T3 width(Automated measurements)
245
265
285
305
325
345
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
Relative Laser Power (%)
Wid
th o
f T3
(nm
)
23/11/00 Repli0011 18
Feature Geometry
Automated, high-accuracy measurementof size, shape, and position of individual
features
10
23/11/00 Repli0011 19
Feature GeometryH eight Profile across a bum p
Position
Hei
ght
Height
W idth N ear Top
W idth at user defined height
W idth N ear Bottom
Sidewall Angle
23/11/00 Repli0011 20
Data Capture: 10 um Scans for DVD
Calibrator Test (DVD Stamper)
11
23/11/00 Repli0011 21
Pit Geometry of DVD
300
350
400
450
500
300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500
Length at Threshold (nm)
Wid
th a
t Thr
esho
ld (n
m)
23/11/00 Repli0011 22
Feature Width:Defect Identification
12
23/11/00 Repli0011 23
Feature detail
23/11/00 Repli0011 24
Expansion of Feature detail
13
23/11/00 Repli0011 25
Length Analysis gives“AFM Jitter” and more
Length AnalysisBumps Lands
Jitter 6.82% 6.00%Channel bit length (nm) 134.38 133.68Offset (nm) 31.88 -36.76
Good Stampers have Jitter about 3 - 3.5%
23/11/00 Repli0011 26
Length deviation vs T number(Power series stamper)
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
T#
Devi
atio
n (n
m)
12.50%0.00%-10.00%
14
23/11/00 Repli0011 27
Write Strategy / Length OffsetLength vs. T Number
Length Analysis(Write Strategy)
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
T Number
Effe
ct L
engt
h (n
m)
Y Intercept = -34.21 nm(Length Offset)
Slope = 133.51(Channel Bit length)
23/11/00 Repli0011 28
Length offset vs relative laserpower
-100
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-12% -7% -2% 3%Relative laser power
Leng
th o
ffset
(nm
)
15
23/11/00 Repli0011 29
Asymmetry vs Length Offset
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
-100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40
Length Offset (nm)
Ass
ymm
etry
(%)
23/11/00 Repli0011 30
Comparison of DiscTrack Plus with Stamper Player
Relative Laser Power 12.5% 0.0% -10.0% 12.5% 0.0% -10.0%Jitter (%) 3.20% 3.29% 3.34% 3.00% 3.35% 3.54%Channel Bit Length 132.94 133.05 132.63 132.66 133.26 135.05Offset -7.09 -37.61 -74.91 1.90 34.20 65.32Mean Width at T3 322.27 299.13 259.80Width Variation (Total SD within group) 9.61 7.29 7.30
Jitter (%) 10.10% 7.10% 15.20%
Asymmetry 17.90% 6.10% -5.90%Stam
per
Play
er
Effect (Bump) Land
AFM
- D
iscT
rack
Plu
s
16
23/11/00 Repli0011 31
How do you fix a jitterproblem?
Edge Placement Variation
Asymmetry
Length Bias
Other effects
Comes
from
Jitter
Disc Analyzers giveyou a number
Jitter
Length Offset (Deviation)
Channel Bit Length
Pit GeometryTrack Pitch
DiscTrack Plus Tells youwhat causes it
23/11/00 Repli0011 32
Image of CD-R Stamper
17
23/11/00 Repli0011 33
Summary of Measurements
23/11/00 Repli0011 34
Individual WidthMeasurements
18
23/11/00 Repli0011 35
Width of stamper ridges
23/11/00 Repli0011 36
Height of Stamper Ridges
19
23/11/00 Repli0011 37
OD angle in stamper ridges
23/11/00 Repli0011 38
ID angle in stamper ridges
20
23/11/00 Repli0011 39
Geometry of pre-formedgroove in CD-R
Mean values Brand A Brand BGroove Depth (nm) 135.61 172.18Width at Half-Ht. (nm) 442.82 569.49Left Side Angle (deg.) (Outer Diameter Direction) 26.37 26.91Right Side Angle (deg) (Inner Diameter Direction) 21.85 24.5
23/11/00 Repli0011 40
Complex Header Structure:Magneto Optical Disc
◆ Are the Pits Centered between the Grooves?B
A
21
23/11/00 Repli0011 41
Track Pitch measurement ofMagneto Optical disc
Feature Centering
500520540560580600620640660680700
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16Half Track
Pitc
h (n
m)
Spacing between pit and groove to left
Spacing between pit and groove to right
A
B
23/11/00 Repli0011 42
Pitch results for Groups A and B(left and right half tracks)
Half Tracks Mean (nm) StDev Max Min RangeLeft 622.98 10.61 631.37 601.02 30.35Right 547.45 2.14 551.01 544.83 6.18
BA
◆ Groups A and B had different Pitch, so Pitsnot centered between grooves
◆ Group A pitch had 5x less variation thanGroup B pitch, so Group A corresponds to 2beams locked together. Group B pitchvariation reflects stage motion in LBR.
22
23/11/00 Repli0011 43
DVD+RW Groove Wobble
23/11/00 Repli0011 44
Measurement of GrooveWobble Amplitude
◆ Direct Physical Measurement usingmany, high-precision track pitchmeasurements
◆ Can Measure stampers or mastersbefore replication
◆ Independent check on electrical testers
23
23/11/00 Repli0011 45
Pitch Measurements
Measure 50 pitchvalues along eachpair of tracks.
23/11/00 Repli0011 46
Wobble MeasurementsDVD+RW Wobble
680
700
720
740
760
780
800
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Track Number
Pitc
h (n
m)
Pitch (nm)Mean 746.35
Range 114.37Wobble
Amplitude 28.59
24
23/11/00 Repli0011 47
Compute Wobblefrom Track Pitch
Wobble in adjacent tracks
Track one
Track two
Wobble Amplitude(A)
Mean Pitch(P) P-2A P+2A
Difference4A
Typical Measurementregion
Wobble amplitudegreatly exaggerated
23/11/00 Repli0011 48
Wobble Measurement SampleResults
Wobble as measured in track pitch
1470
1490
1510
1530
1550
1570
1590
1610
Track #
Pitc
h (n
m)
Pitch
Range: 136 nm
Wobble: 34 nm
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
25
23/11/00 Repli0011 49
Summary◆ AFM plus Automatic Tools◆ Improved Calibration & Precision◆ High Count --> Statistical Analysis
– Track Pitch– Pit Geometry– Width Variation– Defects– Wobble
23/11/00 Repli0011 50
Advanced Surface Microscopy
◆ We don’t make the AFM,we make the AFM better.
◆ DiscTrack PlusTM Media MeasurementSystem
◆ www.asmicro.com◆ [email protected]
26
23/11/00 Repli0011 51
Where is ASM?
23/11/00 Repli0011 52
What does ASM do?◆ Analytical Service Lab specializing in
SPM (Scanning Probe Microscopy)◆ Precision measurement systems and
other software enhancements forSPM’s
◆ Buy and sell used NanoScopes◆ Consulting and training in SPM