Upload
teachmaths
View
301
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Accreditation Timeline Overview
Part 1 September to November 2009 - Launching
Part 2 – December 2009 to October 2010 – Section committee work
Part 3 – November/December 2010 – Steering Committee
Preparation for team visit – December 2010 – March 2011
Team Visit – March 2011
Decision - April/May 2011
The Steering Committee
Breaking down tasks
Structuring the timeline
Planning training sessions
Forecasting issues and searching for solutions
Bouncing ideas
Sharing the load
• Steering • Part 1 • Section A Philosophy and Objectives• Section B Curriculum (Split into 13 sub committees)• Section C Governance and Management• Section D Staff• Section E Students Support Services• Section F Resources• Section G Student and community Life
Part 1 and Launch
Committee Structure
• Primary• Years 7 to 11• IB
Committee Structure
• Art and Design Technology• English and Drama• ICT• LOTE (Languages other than
English)• Mathematics• Music• Natural Sciences• PE• PSCHE• Social Sciences
Section B Curriculum
• Endicott College
• Staff• Parents• Students• Board
• Results inform Commitees
Opinion Survey - Completed
Nov 6 2009
Part 1 Committee Work
Excellent opportunity to work in mixed groups
Reviewed and re-wrote the description of the school
Analysed the results of the questionnaire
Pulled out the significant results
Wrote the reports
Presented to all committee members on 4th January
Committee Chairs training
Dec 2nd 2009
Interactive and engaging workshop sessions aimed at the following
Complete familiarisation with the nature of the tasks and the timeline
Demonstration and practise using the collaborative workspaces designed for the process
Giving and sharing of the skills required to successfully chair committees in this context
January 4th Training
Everybody together for the first time in their new roles
Part 1 Report
All Committees meet during the day
Everyone feeling clearer about the task, everyone takes a task away.
All participants log on to moodle
Step 1 – Collecting info started
Meeting/communication methods established
Stage 1 – Assembling relevant documentation and information about the section
Stage 2 – Writing the descriptive profile for the section
Part 2
‘Buzz’
‘It was a really dynamic meeting’
‘I can see how this will bring about School Improvement’
‘Feels great to working on a project as a whole school’
Stage 3 – Judging the section against the standards
1c The Head of School assigns reasonable work loads to members of staff.
2a Staff members work co-operatively to establish and maintain a positive school climate.
Stage 3 – Judging the section against the standards
We feel that these judgmentsare very much a first draftand that during the next part of the process there will be an opportuntiy to review
Step 3 review
Backwards and Forwards…..
SLG Parents Staff Directors
Descriptive Profiles
Judgements
SLG
QuestionnairePart 1
Report
Preliminary report
Students
Stage 4 – Identifying strengths and weaknesses then drafting action plans
Canvassing for suggestions
Staff – through school structures
Directors – Through this meeting
Parents – through the parent delegates body
Students – through the school council
Stage 4 – Identifying strengths and weaknesses then drafting action plans
SLG – piecing the puzzle together
Stage 4 – The Whole School Action Plan
Communication
Curriculum Development
E-learning
Assessment
Staffing
Professional developmentStudent Support
Internationalism
Stage 5 – Writing and submitting the report
Summarry of Commitee findings
Making sure report follows guidelines
Checking for style and correctness
Part 3 – Summarising reports and action plans, prioritising and preparing materials for the visiting team
Part 3 – Summarising reports and action plans, prioritising and preparing materials for the visiting team
Steering Group