2
316 Orthostatic Blood Pressure Responses as a Function of Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: The ARIC Study RODNEY CLARK, a,b HERMAN A. TYROLER, c AND GERARDO HEISS c b Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, 71 West Warren, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA c Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, USA According to a recent definition devised by the Joint National Committee on High Blood Pressure, approximately 51 million Americans, 17 years of age and older, meet diagnostic criteria for hypertension. 1 One controversial line of research aimed at delineating the putative causes of hypertension has examined the relationship between cardiovascular responses to standardized stressors (e.g., orthostasis) and cardiovascular outcomes. 2–5 Research also suggests that cardiovascular responses to these stressors vary as a function of ethnicity 6 and socioeconomic status. 7 This study examined the effects of ethnicity and education on orthostatic blood pressure responses in a normotensive sample of participants free of clinical cardio- vascular disease and diabetes (n = 6,412). Average supine–standing blood pressure measurements were calculated and were used for stratified and logistic analyses. Prevalence odds ratios (POR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated as the measures of effect in the multivariate logistic analyses. Sitting systolic and dias- tolic blood pressure levels were associated with the magnitude of orthostatic blood pressure responses. African-Americans were more likely to exhibit exaggerated sys- tolic (POR = 1.22, CI = 1.08, 1.38) and diastolic (POR = 1.32, CI = 1.15, 1.50) blood pressure responses to orthostasis. Relative to participants with 12 years of education, participants with less than 12 years of education were more likely to have exagger- ated increases or exaggerated decreases in systolic blood pressure on standing (12% and 20%, respectively). A significant interaction between ethnicity and education was not observed in these data. There was no evidence of modification of ethnicity and education effects by any of the covariates. The observed orthostatic blood pressure differences may be attributable to differ- ential exposures to chronic psychosocial stressors in African-Americans and those of low educational achievement. 8,9 Future studies might extend the finding here by (1) obtaining individual information on environmental factors like perceived racism, chronic stress, and job strain to quantify psychosocial stress exposure; (2) examining the possible mediating effects of psychosocial factors like John Henryism, life style a Address for correspondence: Rodney Clark, Department of Psychology, Wayne State Uni- versity, 71 West Warren, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. 313-577-7640 (voice); 313-577-7636 (fax). e-mail: [email protected]

Orthostatic Blood Pressure Responses as a Function of Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: The ARIC Study

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Orthostatic Blood Pressure Responses as a Function of Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: The ARIC Study

316

Orthostatic Blood Pressure Responses as a Function of Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: The ARIC Study

RODNEY CLARK,

a,b

HERMAN A. TYROLER,

c

AND GERARDO HEISS

c

b

Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, 71 West Warren, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA

c

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, USA

According to a recent definition devised by the Joint National Committee on HighBlood Pressure, approximately 51 million Americans, 17 years of age and older,meet diagnostic criteria for hypertension.

1

One controversial line of research aimedat delineating the putative causes of hypertension has examined the relationshipbetween cardiovascular responses to standardized stressors (e.g., orthostasis) andcardiovascular outcomes.

2–5

Research also suggests that cardiovascular responses tothese stressors vary as a function of ethnicity

6

and socioeconomic status.

7

This study examined the effects of ethnicity and education on orthostatic bloodpressure responses in a normotensive sample of participants free of clinical cardio-vascular disease and diabetes (

n

=

6,412). Average supine–standing blood pressuremeasurements were calculated and were used for stratified and logistic analyses.Prevalence odds ratios (POR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated asthe measures of effect in the multivariate logistic analyses. Sitting systolic and dias-tolic blood pressure levels were associated with the magnitude of orthostatic bloodpressure responses. African-Americans were more likely to exhibit exaggerated sys-tolic (POR

=

1.22, CI

=

1.08, 1.38) and diastolic (POR

=

1.32, CI

=

1.15, 1.50) bloodpressure responses to orthostasis. Relative to participants with 12 years of education,participants with less than 12 years of education were more likely to have exagger-ated increases or exaggerated decreases in systolic blood pressure on standing (12%and 20%, respectively). A significant interaction between ethnicity and educationwas not observed in these data. There was no evidence of modification of ethnicityand education effects by any of the covariates.

The observed orthostatic blood pressure differences may be attributable to differ-ential exposures to chronic psychosocial stressors in African-Americans and thoseof low educational achievement.

8,9

Future studies might extend the finding here by(1) obtaining individual information on environmental factors like perceived racism,chronic stress, and job strain to quantify psychosocial stress exposure; (2) examiningthe possible mediating effects of psychosocial factors like John Henryism, life style

a

Address for correspondence: Rodney Clark, Department of Psychology, Wayne State Uni-versity, 71 West Warren, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. 313-577-7640 (voice); 313-577-7636 (fax).

e-mail: [email protected]

Page 2: Orthostatic Blood Pressure Responses as a Function of Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: The ARIC Study

317CLARK

et al.

: THE ARIC STUDY

incongruity, and anger-coping styles, and (3) investigating the efficacy of psychoso-cial stress exposure as a predictor of subsequent hypertension development.

REFERENCES

1. S

CHWARTZ

, L.M. & S. W

OLOSHIN

. 1999. Changing disease definitions: implicationsfor disease prevalence. Analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Exami-nation Survey, 1988–1994. Eff. Clin. Prac.

2:

76–85.2. M

ATTHEWS

, K.A., K.L. W

OODALL

& M.T. A

LLEN

. 1993. Cardiovascular reactivity tostress predicts future blood pressure status. Hypertension.

22:

479–485.3. M

ANUCK

, S.B., A.L. K

ASPROWICZ

& M.F. M

ULDOON

. 1990. Behaviorally evoked car-diovascular reactivity and hypertension: conceptual issues and potential associations.Ann. Behav. Med.

12:

17–29.4. S

PARROW

, D., B. R

OSNER

, V. V

OKOMAS

& S.T. W

EISS

. 1986. Relationship of bloodpressure measurement in several positions. Am. J. Cardiol.

57:

218–221.5. S

PARROW

, D., C.P. T

IFFT

, B. R

OSENER

& S.T. W

EISS

. 1984. Postural changes in dias-tolic blood pressure and the risk of myocardial infarction: the normative aging study.Circulation

70:

533–537.6. G

OLDSTEIN

, I.B. & D. S

HAPIRO

. 1995. The cardiovascular response to postural changeas a function of race. Bio. Psycho.

19:

173–186.7. A

RMSTEAD

, C.A., N.B. Anderson & K.A. Lawler. 1994. The interaction of socioeco-nomic status, ethnicity, and cardiovascular reactivity among women.

In

Program andAbstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Psychosomatic Society, Boston, MA.

8. C

LARK

, R., N.B. A

NDERSON

, V.R. C

LARK

& D.R. W

ILLIAMS

. 1999. Racism as a stres-sor for African Americans: a biopsychosocial model. Am. Psychol.

54:

805–816.9. A

NDERSON

, N.B. & C.A. A

RMSTEAD

. 1995. Toward understanding the association ofsocioeconomic status and health: a new challenge for the biopsychosocial approach.Psychosom. Med.

57:

213–225.