Upload
phamquynh
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Social Monitoring Report
This report has been submitted to ADB by the Project Management Unit (OIIAWMIP), Bhubaneswar and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s Public Communications Policy (2011). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB.
This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Project Number: 38411-043 June 2017 Period: July 2016 – December 2016
IND: Orissa Integrated Irrigated Agriculture and Water Management Investment Program (OIIAWMIP)- Project 2 Subproject: HLC-Range-1 (0-10 km) Mahanadi North Division, Cuttack
Submitted by:
Project Management Unit (OIIAWMIP), Bhubaneswar
i
Department of Water Resources (DoWR)
Project Management Unit (PMU)
Orissa Integrated Irrigated Agriculture and
Water Management Investment Programme (OIIAWMIP)
(Loan No. 3265)
Internal Monitoring Report on Implementation of Resettlement Plan of
HLC-Range-1 (0-10 km) Mahanadi North Division, Cuttack
July 2016 to December 2016
assisted by
Institutional Strengthening and Project Management Consultants (ISPMC)
Hydrosult, Division of SNC- Lavalin Inc.
in association with
Sutra Consulting Pvt. Ltd., SBH Consultants Pvt. Ltd and N.K. Buildcon Pvt. Ltd
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................ii LIST OF FIGURES: ........................................................................................................................ii LIST OF ANNEXURE: .................................................................................................................ii
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 4
Chapter-1: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 5
1.1 Project Background and Description ................................................................................. 5
1.2 Objectives of the Report .................................................................................................... 5
1.3 Purpose of the Report ........................................................................................................ 6
1.4 Social Safeguard Categorization ........................................................................................ 6
Chapter-2: Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 7
2.1 Impact on Land, Structure and Livelihood ................................................................... 7
2.2 Impact on Common Property Resources (CPRs) .......................................................... 8
Chapter 3: Compensation & Assistance ................................................................................... 10
3.1 Status of Missing APs and Structures not found during the CSO survey................. 12
3.2 Compensation, relocation or protection of CPRs ........................................................ 12
Chapter 4: Consultations and Disclosures ............................................................................... 13
Chapter 5: Grievances Redress Mechanism ............................................................................ 15
Chapter 6: Institutional Arrangements ..................................................................................... 17
Chapter 7: Compliance of Resettlement Framework, 2015 through CAP ........................ 19
Chapter 8: Conclusion and Recommendations ....................................................................... 20
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Package wise Coverage details of APs ............................................................. 8
Table 2: Type of Common Property Resources (CPRs) ................................................. 8
Table 3 : Summary of disbursement of Compensation and Other Allowances ............ 11
Table 4: Disbursements made by Type of Assistance to APs (31 December 2016) .... 12
Table 5: Number of Consultations Organized with APs ................................................ 14
Table 6: Package-wise number and type of Grievances ............................................... 16
Table 7: Component wise Approved and Revised Estimate ......................................... 19
Table 8: Assessment of social safeguards issues and recommendation ..................... 20
LIST OF FIGURES:
Figure 1: Grievance Redress Process ........................................................................... 16
Figure 2: Organizational Chart for Managing the Social Safeguard Issues .................. 18
LIST OF ANNEXURE:
Annexure 1: Summary Status of Disbursement paid to APs - 31 December 2016 ...... 21
Annexure 2: Status of Civil Works Contract in HLC-R-1 Canal Division (0-10 km) ...... 27
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 3
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB- Asian Development Bank AHHs- Affected Households AUs- Affected Units BPL- Below Poverty Line BSR- Basic Schedule of Rates CPSs- Common Property Structures CSO- Civil Society Organisation DC- District Collector DOWR- Department of Water Resources EA- Executing Agency EES- Encroachment Enumeration Survey FGD- Focus Group Discussion GOI- Government of India GRC- Grievance Redress Committee ha- Hectare HH- Household IA- Implementing Agency IMEA- Independent Monitoring and Evaluation Agency NGO- Non-Government Organizations NIA- Net Irrigated Area NRRP- National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy, OBC- Other Backward Caste OIIAWMIP- Orissa Integrated Irrigated Agriculture and Water Management Investment Program ORRP- Orissa Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy OWRCP- Orissa Water Resources Consolidation Project PD- Project Director PIM- Participatory Irrigation Management PMU- Project Management Unit P-P- Public Property PRO- Project Resettlement Officer RF- Resettlement Framework RP- Resettlement Plan RO- Resettlement Officer RS- Resettlement Specialist SC- Scheduled Caste SGO- State Government of Orissa SIA- Social Impact Assessment SIO- Subproject Implementation Office SMR- Social Monitoring Report SPS- Safeguard Policy Statement SRO- Subproject Resettlement Officer ST- Scheduled Tribe ToR- Terms of Reference WB- World Bank WUA- Water Users Association
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 4
Executive Summary
1. The Government of Orissa (GoO), with the financial assistance from Asian Development Bank (ADB) in form of a multi-tranche financing facility (MFF), decided to strengthen lending approach over a span of eight years, aims to reduce rural poverty levels in the State by improving agriculture sector productivity and enhancing rural incomes. It is estimated that the OIIAWMIP will cover to enhance productivity and sustainability of existing 6 major and 9 medium irrigation schemes covering 190,000 ha (NIA), and about 1,400 minor lift irrigation schemes covering up to 30,000 ha with participatory irrigation management (PIM) in four river basin i.e. Subarnarekha, Burhabalanga, Baitarani and Brahmani basins and part of the Mahanadi delta. Most of the subproject works will be limited to rehabilitation and improvement of the existing irrigation system and will not involve acquisition of private land. 2. The Executing Agency (EA) for the Investment Program is the Project Management Unit (PMU) under the Water Resource Department (DoWR), Government of Orissa. The Project Management Unit (PMU), headed by a Project Director, is implementing Resettlement Plans (RP) through the Executive Engineer, Mahanadi North Division, Cuttack. 3. Survey data revealed that out of 124 Affected Persons (APs), 108 APs accepted the notice and signed the ID card. Total 28 Common Property Resources (CPRs) enumerated covering all packages in HLC Range 1 under Mahanadi North Division. A total of 16 APs could not be located/ traced during CSO physical verification in the subproject. 4. Out of 108 APs, 97 APs have received their assistance and compensation up to reporting period while payment for 11 APs are under process. 5. Implementation of RP has undertaken in HLC Range-1 mainly in mobilization, motivation, participation and community awareness. Life Academy of Vocational Studies (LAVS) has been engaged as civil society organisation (CSO) to implement the social safeguard requirements and to assist the SIO (EE) in implementing RPs 6. A grievance redress mechanism has been established in the project and District Level Committee (DLC) set up to monitor project implementation in the subproject. During this reporting period of past 6 months, out of total 41 grievances were received 27 grievances resolved. Rest 14 grievances are generally related to issues like inclusion of name in the entitlement matrix and demanding for revaluation of affected structures. These grievances were resolved by the EE in a congenial, transparent and impartial manner, as and when received. The grievances submitted to the Sub collector for consideration and decision will be communicated to the APs shortly during the course of implementation. 7. This monitoring report covers information/date of the RP implementation up to 31 December 2016.
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 5
Chapter-1: Introduction
1.1 Project Background and Description 8. The Orissa Integrated Irrigated Agriculture and Water Management Investment
Program (OIIAWMIP), being funded by the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
through the multi-tranche financing facility (MFF) lending approach, aims to
reduce rural poverty levels in the State by improving agriculture sector
productivity and enhancing rural incomes.
9. It is estimated that the OIIAWMIP will cover to enhance productivity and
sustainability of existing 6 major and 9 medium irrigation schemes covering
190,000 ha (NIA), and about 1,400 minor lift irrigation schemes covering up to
30,000 ha with participatory irrigation management (PIM) in four river basin i.e.
Subarnarekha, Burhabalanga, Baitarani and Brahmani basins and part of the
Mahanadi delta. Most of the subproject works are limited to rehabilitation and
improvement of the existing irrigation system and not involve acquisition of
private land.
10. As all infrastructure works will be implemented within the right-of-way (RoW) of
the canals (and drains), involuntary resettlement impacts are limited to losses
that may be incurred by squatters. Encroachment in the right-of-way (RoW) of
canal was assessed using field inspections along the main canal, and
discussions with selected affected persons (APs) and DOWR field staffs.
Existing structures along the main canal included huts, shops, sheds built within
the RoW of the main canal.
11. The renovation work under the HLC Range 1 subproject involves strengthening
and widening of the existing embankment of almost 10 km as well as bank
protection work and aims at addressing the key issues and challenges faced by
the people of the region in terms of loss of life and property caused by the
annual flooding. The total distance under HLC Range 1 sub-project covering a
distance of 10 km administered by Nutang sub-division under Mahanadi North
Division will be strengthened to provide irrigation to 13,790 ha benefitting 112
villages.
12. The project would entail loss of assets and livelihoods of people settled (all non
titleholders) on either side of the existing embankment. The asset loss to these
affected households is mainly in terms of loss of residential, commercial as
well as Common Property Resources (CPRs). There is no agriculture land
that would be affected by the project.
1.2 Objectives of the Report
13. Main objectives of internal monitoring report is to assess the disbursement
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 6
status of compensation and resettlement implementation are: (i) Verifying
internal monitoring results; (ii) Checking implementation of actual
compensation and resettlement to examine whether the project RP policies are
complied with or not; (iii) Evaluating efficiency, impacts and stability of
resettlement activities; (iv) Recommending necessary adjustments for
implementation of resettlement for the successive components of the Project.
1.3 Purpose of the Report 14. The purpose of monitoring Report is to analyse periodically over the total
implementation period of the project to comply with the approved Involuntary
Resettlement (IR) Plan. PMU has the responsibility to oversee the
implementation and monitoring of social safeguards issues of the subproject. As
usual, this report covered resettlement and social safeguard monitoring results
to comply with the spirit of ADB policy to ‘enhance stakeholders trust’ in and
ability to engage with ADB, and thereby increase the development impact (of
projects) in which disclosure of safeguard monitoring is a prominent aspect.
This report covers Social Monitoring, addressing all the issues related with
social safeguards, with reference to the progress achieved and current status
of reporting period.
1.4 Social Safeguard Categorization 15. ADB's classification system: Prior to civil works implementation, all the
subprojects selected for construction or developments are to be screened and
classified using ADB's classification system as follows:
� Category A: Subprojects proposed for construction or development, will fall
under this category, if, it caused a significant involuntary resettlement impacts
with a physical displacement of 200 or more persons from their residences, or
200 or more persons lose 10% or more of their productive or income
generating assets, or more persons or 200 or more persons experience a
combination of both.
� Category B: Any proposed subproject that includes involuntary resettlement
impacts but are not deemed significant considering loss of shelter/houses or
productive or income generating assets will be considered for category B.
� Category C: A proposed subproject that has no involuntary resettlement
impact.
16. All the sub projects come under “Category A” based on the definition given in
the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009 (SPS) respectively. It is
confirmed that there are no Indigenous People (IP), no private land acquisition
issues noticed during the survey. The project involves significant displacement
and loss of livelihood, for which they would be compensated as specified in the
approved Resettlement Plan.
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 7
Chapter-2: Impacts 2.1 Impact on Land, Structure and Livelihood
17. It has been stated earlier that HLC-R-1 subproject are classified as category
‘A’ for involuntary resettlement in considerations of the ADB’s Involuntary
Resettlement Policy. Resettlement Plan has been prepared for the
subproject having IR impacts. Affected Persons (APs) were identified
through the Encroachment Enumeration Survey (EES) i.e. census survey.
18. It is pertinent to mention here that land acquisition is not within the purview of
HLC-R-1 subproject. Land acquisition is not required as all construction work
mainly completed within 50 meters of the ROW, which is Government land.
Social impacts are confined to private properties, which exist on within the Right
of way (RoW). These impacts are mainly loss of livelihood due to
displacement from the location of business.
19. All the APs have been validated and verified by the CSO (LAVS), appointed for
RP implementation at their respective subprojects. As per updated list of APs
from approved entitlement matrix, CSO appointed for RP implementation
concluded the task such as field verification of APs (issuing notice, signature,
photos & proof of identification like voter ID, bank details, signing of ID card etc.
were taken) and provide assistance in opening of the bank A/C (if
required) before issuing the ID Cards and disbursement. During verification or
thereafter disbursement of livelihood assistance, few APs could not be located
or traced. Even few APs shown their unwillingness to receive their
assistance because they have no proof of document. Efforts are still being
made by the CSO to trace / convince them.
20. A total 124 APs was enumerated during the time of encroachment enumeration
survey (EES) in January 2013. During RP implementation in March 2016,
a total of 108 APs accepted the evacuation notice and signed the ID cards.
Total 16 APs could not be traced and their structures also not found on the
canal embankment. Major APs found in Package - 4 (77 APs), whereas 24 APs
are reported in Package 7 and minor and sub minor canal. A considerable
number of these APs are mainly residential squatters (63.0%) losing their
livelihood, whereas remaining is falling under Commercial category (37.0%).
Particular attention is also being paid to Vulnerable Groups. These APs
reported under vulnerable groups1 are 72.0% of the total APs. Package wise
details are depicted below in Table 1.
1 Vulnerable Group include Below Poverty Lin (BPL), Schedule Caste (SC), Schedule Tribe (ST), Woman Headed
Household (WHH), disabled persons, etc
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 8
Table 1: Package wise Coverage details of APs
Civil Works (CW) Package No
As per EES, 2013 2016 RP
Implementation Remarks
Res Com Total Res Com Total
Pack-1 5 2 7 5 2 7 No Change
Pack-4 47 33 80 44 33 77 3 Structures not existing during CSO verification
Pack-7 27 10 37 16 8 24 13 Structures not existing during CSO verification
Total 79 45 124 65 43 108
2.2 Impact on Common Property Resources (CPRs)
21. Impact on CPRs is a very critical issue from the point of view of the community.
The community feeling is attached with the common properties especially with
the religious structures. The impact on the number of CPRs reduced because of
protective measures to canal section at the time of implementation. It is also
significant to mention here that some issues related to CPRs has resolved
through community consultation and providing engineering solution by avoiding
impact on common property in the package 5, 12 and Minor and Sub minors.
The status of CPRs remains unchanged during this reporting period. The actual
impacts on CPRs at the time of implementation stage are presented in Table 2.
Table 2: Type of Common Property Resources (CPRs)
CW Package No
No of CPRs
Type of CPR Remarks
4 25 Mangala Thakurani Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Hanuman Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Balunkeswar Nodal UP School
Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Mangala Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Hanuman Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
GP Office Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Sandha Thakura Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Biswa Bharati Club Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Utkal Gourab Nodal School
Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Jana KalyanYubak Sangha
Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Rama Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Hanuman Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Hanuman Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 9
Electricity Sub -Station Estimate received from CESU and submitted to PD, PMU for approval; shifting process will initiate soon
Kani UP School Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Electricity Sub -Station Estimate received from CESU and submitted to PD, PMU for approval; shifting process will initiate soon
Electricity Sub -Station Estimate received from CESU and submitted to PD, PMU for approval; shifting process will initiate soon
Hanuman Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Electricity Sub -Station Estimate received from CESU and submitted to PD, PMU for approval; shifting process will initiate soon
UP School Totasahi Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Electricity Sub -Station Estimate received from CESU and submitted to PD, PMU for approval; shifting process will initiate soon
Hanuman Statue Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Mahavir Club Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Electricity Sub -Station Estimate received from CESU and submitted to PD, PMU for approval; shifting process will initiate soon
7 3 Siba Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Mangala Mandir Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Bhagabat Tungi Protected by providing vertical retaining wall
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 10
Chapter 3: Compensation & Assistance
22. As of 31 December 2016, all packages under implementation stage have
updated the entitlement matrix. In accordance with the entitlement matrix,
payment was made to APs for structure cost, livelihood assistance, shifting
assistance, assistance for vulnerable APs and additional assistance to
employees wherever applicable. The total budget for RP implementation was
concurred by ADB and approved by DoWR. The EE have disbursed the
compensation and livelihood assistance as per the approved entitlement matrix.
23. As per as the disbursement of compensation to number of APs in the subproject
is concerned, by 31 December 2016 the progress is about 91.3 %. Remaining
8.7% of APs is still to be paid falling under package-1 (4 nos), Minor & sub
minor (5 nos) and package-4 (2 nos). These 11 APs could not submit their
supporting documents for availing the compensation and allowances. The
implementing CSO (LAVS) is pursuing this matter with District Administration
and APs on a regular basis so that payment to APs made immediately. Prior to
commencement of construction activity, all the APs to be compensated in
accordance with the approved entitlement matrix.
24. For further details of AP’s, assistance disbursement date and status refer
Annexure 1. Summary of status of APs whether paid or unpaid, if unpaid with
reasons, are tabulated in as Table 3.
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 11
Table 3 : Summary of disbursement of Compensation and Other Allowances
Package No
Affected Persons (APs) Affected area (in Sq. mtr.) Compensation & Livelihood
Assistance (Rs.) Reasons for
not paid
Total Received full payment
% Achieved Balance Total Acquired Balance Total Disbursed Balance Payment is in progress
1 2 3 4 5 (2-3) 6 7 8 (6-7) 9 10 11 (9-10) 12
Pack-1 7 3 42.9 4 256 66 190 1,25,010 55,380 69,630 4
Pack-4 77 75 97.4 2 1,434 1,409 25 12,55,619 12,40,664 14,955 2
Pack-7 & Others
24 19 79.2 5 975 875 100 7,87,680 6,82,641 1,05,039 5
Total 108 97 89.8 11 2665 2350 315 21,68,309 19,78,685 1,89,624 11
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 12
25. As mentioned earlier, in all packages are covered with compensation paid to
APs. In these packages, 108 APs are reported and out of those 97 APs have
been compensated as per the entitlement matrix covering their livelihood
assistance, shifting assistance, vulnerability assistance and additional
assistance to employees at minimum wage level as per the prescribed norm.
Table 4: Disbursements made by Type of Assistance to APs (31 December 2016)
Package No
APs received compensation
Type of Assistance Disbursed to APs (in Rs.) Total
Amount Disbursed
Structure Cost
Livelihood Assistance
Shifting Allowance
One time Addl. Asst. (VHHs)
Assistance for Employees
Pack-1 3 28,380 6,000 6,000 15,000 0 55,380
Pack-4 75 6,85,664 1,50,000 1,50,000 2,55,000 0 12,40,664
Pack-7 19 5,41,641 38,000 38,000 65,000 0 6,82,641
Total 97 12,55,685 1,94,000 1,94,000 3,35,000 - 19,78,685
3.1 Status of Missing APs and Structures not found during the CSO survey
26. Identification of missing and non-existing APs is a major problem; however
efforts are being made by CSO to trace them but it is very difficult to locate
these APs. It is observed that APs who are missing from starting or can’t be
located or have migrated or shifted to some other nearby towns (willingly) well
before the initiation of project implementation as well as mobilization of CSO. In
some packages it was found that few APs deceased so it was decided to make
the payment to their dependents or guardians after submission of supporting
legal documents from the district administration (refer to Table 1).
27. In support of Missing APs and other related issues, concerned SDOs are
advised to collect records of written information from surrounding vendors or
shopkeepers or public representatives. The project will address the issues
of missing APs. Such type of APs will be considered as absentee or no longer
eligible by the time of project closure. Actually missing APs who have wilfully
migrated from the site/town well before initiation of this project
implementation work as their livelihood has not been impacted by the project (in
reality).
3.2 Compensation, relocation or protection of CPRs 28. The project would also lead to impacts on the CPRs like temple, religious
platform, hand pumps, electric transformers, and boundary wall of
religious structures. A total of 28 CPRs would be affected along the project. The
details of the different type of affected CPRs are already provided in Table 2.
Cash compensation at replacement value in consultation with the community
will be provided wherever it is applicable with proper documentation. In
all packages project will give emphasis to protect the existing CPRs either
through providing vertical retaining wall to protect affected CPR.
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 13
Chapter 4: Consultations and Disclosures
29. A meaningful consultation with APs, local community and civil society for each
package identified as having involuntary resettlement impacts are conducted by
the project. It begins right from initiation for RP implementation in the following
manner:
� begins early in the project preparation stage and is carried out on an on-going basis throughout the project cycle;
� provides timely disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is
understandable and readily accessible to affected person about project
impacts and entitlement matrix;
� undertaken in an atmosphere free of intimidation or coercion;
� customized with the disadvantaged such as social and economic backward
group under vulnerable category (Schedule Caste (SC), Indigenous Peoples /
Schedule Caste (ST), Woman Headed Household (WHH), Physically
Disabled People, Below Poverty Line (BPL); and
� incorporation of all relevant views of affected people and other stakeholders
into decision making, such as project design, mitigation measures, the
sharing of development benefits and opportunities, and implementation
issues.
� Procedure for submission of grievances and contact details of the EEs and
SDOs
30. The EA should pay particular attention to the need of disadvantaged under
vulnerable groups. During RP implementation, the officials from LAVS staffs
from EE organise consultation mainly on social safeguard issues. It is found
during consultations that the participants outlined the necessity of the widening
and strengthening of HLC-R-1 Canal. All participants welcomed the project
and opined to provide all cooperation during civil construction activity. Majority
of participants reported that quality construction and improvement of water flow
to provide better irrigation facility in their locality. The proposed project will in
fact bring lot of benefit to mass people in the district. Since the project is done
mostly in the RoW, which is government land or on the existing alignments, so,
there is no need for additional land for civil works.
31. During July – December 2016, the issues raised in Public Consultation
Meetings were related to R&R Implementation Activities. Opening of Bank A/c,
and Disbursement of Assistance were the prime issues raised, which were
suitably addressed by the concerned SDOs/JEs of the respective irrigation
divisions. It was further communicated that 30 days notice would be provided to
APs before Civil Works initiate (in that section) and disbursement would be
completed prior to the mobilization of the contractor in particular package.
Package wise details of Public Consultation Meetings with APs are depicted in
the Table 5 below and status of award of civil packages mentioned in
Annexure-2.
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS-ISPMC 14
Table 5: Number of Consultations Organized with APs
Sl. No
Name of Village/Place
Package No No of APs
No. of Consultation organized with APs
during-Reporting Period
No. of Consultation
organized with AHs - Dec 2016
No. of Participants
participated - Dec 2016
Issues Discussed with APs
1 Deulchua 1 7 1 1 4 Broadly checked the disbursement figure with entitlement matrix, updated passbook, construction quality and collection of grievances (if any)
2 Itwa/Biswanathpur 4 43 1 2 12 Broadly checked the disbursement figure with entitlement matrix, updated passbook, construction quality and collection of grievances (if any)
3 Kotsahi 7 & Others 18 1 2 28 Broadly checked the disbursement figure with entitlement matrix, updated passbook, construction quality and collection of grievances (if any)
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
15
Chapter 5: Grievances Redress Mechanism
32. A Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) has been established by the project with the
objective of receiving and facilitating the resolution of complaints & grievances by APs.
The GRM is scaled to the risks and adverse impacts of the project. It should address
APs concerns and complaints promptly, using an understandable and transparent
process that is gender responsive, culturally appropriate, and readily accessible to all
segments of the APs at no cost and without retribution.
33. In this regard the District Level Committee (DLC), is acting as a grievance redress
committee (GRC) under the chairmanship of District Collector with representatives from
the Revenue department, Executive Engineer, HLC-R-1 Canal Division, community-
based organizations (CBOs) and CSO. As a GRC, the DLC meets at regular intervals
based on the availability of the DLC /GRC members and also as per requirement or
pending issues. Grievances not redressed by the GRC will be referred to the PMU for
action. At any stage the AP may take their complaints to a court of law.
34. Concerned SDO along with JEs have been entrusted with the responsibility to maintain a
proper register of the grievance (if any), which will be endorsed by the members involved
in implementation. GRC registers are in place at all sub division level. Further SDOs
have been given instructions to arrange more public consultations and register all the
grievances (including verbal) in writing whether substantial or non substantial and put
them up for the perusal of EE for proper disposal, either at their level or through
GRC/DLC meeting. During this reporting period out of total 41 Grievances were
received, of which 3 grievances are mainly on inclusion of new name in the
entitlement matrix, which was referred to PD, PMU. As suggested by PD, PMU, the
concerned SDO and CSO staffs make a joint field verification and asked all APs to
submit supporting documents on or before January 2013 as proof of evidence for
inclusion of their name in the entitlement matrix. Those APs could not produce any
authenticated documents so finally it was decided not to include their name in the
entitlement matrix and it has been communicated in writing. These grievances are
resolved by the EE as and when received with support from district administration.
Grievances received from 11 APs on demanding revaluation of the loss property. This
issue has been discussed during consultation meeting with APs and will be
compensated through implementation of corrective action plan. Overall out of 41
grievances, 27 grievances resolved and rest are in progress. The status of grievances
are mentioned below in Table-6:
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
16
Table 6: Package-wise number and type of Grievances
Package-No
Name of Tahasil
Place New Name Inclusion
Demanding revaluation
Total Grievances
1 Tangi Chouwder
Deulichua 4 4
4 Tangi Chouwder
Sainto, Kesharpur, Narpada, Napanga, Birol, Saranga, Bhatimunda, Kani, Paiguan, Jaripada, Karuala, Jasarajpur
1 3 4
7 & Others Tangi Chouwder
Tangi, Kothasahi, Magura,
2 2 4
7 & Others Mahanga Kaitha 0 2 2
Total 3 11 14
Figure 1: Grievance Redress Process
APs
EE/CSO/guided by ISPMC
GRC/DLC
PMU
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
17
Chapter 6: Institutional Arrangements 35. The Executing Agency (EA) for the Investment Program is PMU under the Water
Resource Department of GoO. To ensure effective implementation of social safeguard
issues, institutional arrangement and capacity is as follows:
� PMU: Staff responsible for look after the safeguard issues of the project includes; One
Executive Engineer as full time Project Officer-Social at PMU is on board and
Assistant Engineer is also sanctioned to assist PO-Social, Project Director administer
the overall activities.
� SIO level: Executive Engineer of each subproject is responsible for overall activities
with well supported by Sub Divisional Officers (SDOs) and Junior Engineers (JEs) as
nodal officers to look after the social safeguard issues and RP preparation/updating
and implementation etc.
� ISPMC: One Resettlement Specialist (part time) from ISPMC has been appointed to
assist the executive engineer-Social at PMU.
� CSO: Main responsibility of implementing the social safeguard requirements and to
assist the SIOs in implementing RPs and community mobilization through various
public meetings, campaign and media means.
36. During the reporting period, safeguard staffs at PMU and SIO are positioned on regular
basis while ISPMC have deployed the Resettlement Specialist on intermittent basis to
provide technical guidance and support.
37. The concerned SIO (EE) internally monitors the implementation of RPs and looks after
other safeguard issues. SIO at subproject have been established to assist in the
coordination and day-to-day implementation and management of the Investment
Program. The Executive Engineer are deployed at the field office and working closely
with the District Collector, Sub Collector, Tahsildar, Local Bodies/Panchayat Level
Committees and CSO to expedite the payments of compensation to APs. To
implement the RP, the EA engaged LAVS, Bhubaneswar based CSO, who was
mobilized in December 2015 for 4 months to assist SIO in the implementation of RPs.
Due to delay in collection of supporting documents from APs the disbursement of
compensation could not completed within the allocated timeframe. The CSO contract
has been extended till end of May 2017.
38. The EE-Social of PMU and Resettlement Specialist of the ISPMC were entrusted with
the responsibility of monitoring the implementation of this RP and assess its
performance and effectiveness, on the basis of review of reports, field observations,
and consultations with APs, other stakeholders and SIO.
39. Internal monitoring is done on regularly while reporting has been on quarterly basis for
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
18
one year and subsequently has been biannually. The monitoring is conducted at field by
the SIO along with CSO team. They verify APs, distribute ID cards, open bank accounts
and conduct public consultations with APs with respect to project implementation, likely
schedule of initiation of civil works etc. Resettlement Specialist, ISPMC collates all
information of their activities in the form of a report and submits to PMU on a monthly
basis for onward submission.
40. The organizational arrangements for RP preparation and implementation including
monitoring of different social safeguard issues are depicted in Figure 2.
41. Internal Monitoring and Site Visit: The internal monitoring by PMU and SIOs includes: (i)
administrative monitoring to ensure that all compensation as per RP is whether paid or
still unpaid, implementation is on schedule, and problems/grievances are dealt with on a
timely basis; (ii) restoration of public utilities and common property resources impacted
in the project; and (iii) socio-economic monitoring during and after the relocation
process to ensure that people are settled and are better off at the same or different
locations.
Figure 2: Organizational Chart for Managing the Social Safeguard Issues
ADB DoWR
PMU
SIO (EE)
APs
RS, ISPMC
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
19
Chapter 7: Compliance of Resettlement Framework, 2015 through CAP
42. The Resettlement Plan (RP) has been implemented in all Subprojects and the
compensation paid to APs as per the entitlement matrix, 2008, which was
approved by DoWR. During the Mission visit in May 2016, ADB raised the issue
of partial payment of compensation to APs as per the approved entitlement matrix
and advised to pay the balance amount to the APs by preparing the Corrective Action
Plan (CAP). The suggestion was accepted and revised budget estimate covering all
enumerated APs in the Subprojects has been prepared. The revised estimates for
implementation of CAP mainly cover Transitional allowance; assistance for shed
construction and transport allowance. Other components have already been paid to APs
under approved budget estimate. The Table-7 below clearly mentions the additional
components to be under covered CAP.
43. The Resettlement Plan (RP) has been implemented in all Subprojects and the
compensation paid to APs as per the entitlement matrix, 2008, which was
approved by DoWR. During the Mission visit in May 2016, ADB raised the issue
of partial payment of compensation to APs as per the approved entitlement matrix
and advised to pay the balance amount to the APs by preparing the Corrective Action
Plan (CAP). The suggestion was accepted and revised budget estimate covering all
enumerated APs in the Subprojects has been prepared. The revised estimate for
implementation of CAP mainly covers Transitional allowance; assistance for shed
construction and transport allowance. Other components have already been paid to
APs under approved budget estimate. The Table-7 below clearly mentions the additional
components to be under covered CAP.
Table 7: Component wise Approved and Revised Estimate
Sl. No
Type of Compensation and Assistance Approved Estimate-Already Paid to APs
Revised Estimate -To be Paid to APs under CAP
1 Structure Cost As per BSR NIL
2 Livelihood Assistance Rs. 2000/Per AP NIL
3 Shifting Allowance Rs. 2000/Per AP NIL
4 Assistance to Employees Rs. 18000/Per AP NIL
5 Assistance to Vulnerable Household Rs. 5000/Per AP NIL
6 Transitional Allowance NIL Rs. 24000/Per AP
7 Assistance for Temporary Shed construction NIL Rs. 10000/Per AP
8 Transport Allowance NIL Rs. 2000/Per AP
44. The approved budget for HLC Range 1 subproject was Rs. 32,93,861/-and as per RF
2015, the estimated budget for implementation of CAP comes to Rs. 81,42,260/-
covering all enumerated APs (124 nos) The revised estimate has been submitted to the
Government for necessary approval. On receipts of the Government’s approval, the
payment to AP’s as per Corrective Action Plan will be made.
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
20
Chapter 8: Conclusion and Recommendations
45. During the reporting period, each SIO (EE) and other stakeholders have implemented
the social safeguards requirement for information dissemination adequately, helping
APs and local communities to understand the project clearly. The types of assistance
paid to APs and the amounts disbursed complied with the requirements of the RPs.
Grievances of the APs and local people have been resolved timely and adequately. The
APs expressed their satisfaction with their compensation. Each SIO has assigned
either an Assistant Engineer (SDO) or Junior Engineer as a Nodal Officer to take care of
the Social Safeguards. One EE has been assigned as fulltime staff at PMU for all
subprojects for RP implementation.
46. Disbursement of additional compensation to APs under Implementation of Corrective
Action Plan (CAP) needs to be completed earliest for completion of construction activity
within the timeframe.
47. Assessment of social safeguards planned by the project and recommendations has
been an important initiative to improve performance, illustrated below in Table 8.
Table 8: Assessment of social safeguards issues and recommendation
No Description Problem Recommendation
1 Assistance / Compensation to APs
Assistance/compensation to APs are not disbursed before the commencement of civil works in few packages (due to name mismatch and deceased APs)
Regular follow up by EE with sub collector or Tahsildar and ensured that APs should get their legal documents to receive compensation. PMU made practical efforts to ensure full disbursement of compensation to the remaining APs and these efforts must continue. The progress made should be monitored internally and externally until all APs are fully paid/ compensated.
2
Affected Persons (APs) reported ‘Missing’ or ‘structure not existing’
Generally APs are squatter /mobile vendors and may lose their livelihood temporarily due to project activities. It was noted that in subprojects 101 APs could not be compensated due to their absence to receive compensation.
APs found Missing or structure not existing from their location during CSO verification. The attempt was made to send messages through their friends and relatives or close by APs for collection of compensation. In future if any missing AP submitted supporting document he/she will receive compensation as per the approved entitlement matrix.
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
21
Annexure 1: Summary Status of Disbursement paid to APs - 31 December 2016
Sl. No
Photo No
Main/Dist
Civil Package No
Affected
Category
Name of Beneficiary
Caste Annual Income
Area Affected (Sq. Mtr.)
Compensation Paid
Compensation and Allowance to be paid (Rs.) as per CAP
Total payment received
(Rs.)
Present Status of payment
Transitional
Allowance
Temporary shed allowanc
e
Transport
Allowance
Addl. Asst to VHH (if
not paid)
Total Payment
under CAP
Final Payment to be Paid to
APs (Phase-I + Phase-II)
1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (19 to
22) 24 (17+23)
+16
1 1 MC 1 Com Trilochan Rout Gen < 25000 24 19,320 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
2 2 MC 1 Resi Sujit Rout Gen < 25000 22 18,460 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
3 3 MC 1 Com Ratnakar Swain Gen < 25000 20 17,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
4 4 MC 1 Resi Kailash Sumurai SC < 25000 30 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 50,310
5 5 MC 1 Resi Gopi Digi OBC < 25000 60 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 55,620
6 6 MC 1 Resi Narendra Bandra SC < 25000 40 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 52,080
7 7 MC 1 Resi Tania Purty SC < 25000 60 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 55,620
Package-1 256 55,380 1,68,000 70,000 14,000 -
2,52,000 3,21,630
8 10 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Fagu Samal OBC < 25000 30 14,310 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
9 11 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Sadhab Samal Gen < 25000 40 16,080 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
10 12 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Madhab Samal OBC < 25000 36 15,372 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
11 13 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Udhab Samal OBC < 25000 30 14,310 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
12 14 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Manoj Samal OBC < 25000 15 11,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
13 23 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Seikh Hider
Muslim < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
14 29 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Biswaranjan Hati Gen < 25000 40 16,080 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
15 32 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Kabi Bhoi OBC < 25000 14 11,478 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
16 33 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Gouranga Bhoi OBC < 25000 15 11,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
17 39 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Dusasan Nayak OBC < 25000 15 11,655
Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
22
18 47 Disty.No-1 4 Resi
Sujit Kumar Mohanty Gen
85001-1 lakh 25 8,425 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
19 49 Disty.No-1 4 Resi
Sachidanada Mohanty Gen < 25000 30 14,310 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
20 53 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Kailash Das Gen < 25000 12 6,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 5,000 41,000 41,000
21 54 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Bansidhar Das Gen < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
22 55 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Nabin Das Gen < 25000 15 11,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
23 62 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Kishori Nayak Gen < 25000 12 11,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
24 63 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Akshya Maharana Gen < 25000 12 11,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
25 66 Disty.No-1 4 Resi
Dambarudhar Sahoo OBC
25001-45000 12 6,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
26 74 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Baikuntha Mallick SC
25001-45000 30 9,310 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 5,000 41,000 41,000
27 78 Disty.No-1 4 Resi
Paramananda Behera SC < 25000 12 11,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
28 86 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Adikanda Mallick SC
25001-45000 15 - Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 5,000 41,000 47,655
29 90 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Kailash Behera SC < 25000 20 12,540 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
30 92 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Dharani Das Gen < 25000 20 12,540 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
31 27 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Abdul Malik Khan Gen
85001-1 lakh 30 16,900 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
32 64 Disty.No-1 4 Resi
Ramesh Maharana Gen
85001-1 lakh 15 10,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
33 65 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Jatadhari Sahoo OBC
25001-45000 12 9,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
34 67 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Narada Sahoo OBC < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
35 68 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Trailokya Sahoo OBC < 25000 20 17,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
36 70 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Birabara Sahoo OBC < 25000 20 17,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
37 72 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Babaji Sahoo OBC
25001-45000 15 10,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
38 73 Disty.No-1 4 Resi
Harekrushna Sahoo OBC < 25000 15 15,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
39 105 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Kedar Nath Singh Gen
45001-65000 10 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 44,300
40 22 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Jagannath Biswal Gen
45001-65000 25 14,750 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
41 25 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Gora Khan Gen
45001-65000 30 16,900 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
42 26 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Abdul Barik Khan Gen
85001-1 lakh 30 16,900 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
23
43 30 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Maina Bhoi OBC < 25000 12 14,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
44 45 Disty.No-1 4 Resi
Deepak Kumar Mohanty Gen
85001-1 lakh 40 21,200 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
45 46 Disty.No-1 4 Resi
Manoj Kumar Sahoo Gen < 25000 30 21,900 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
46 51 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Alekh Behera SC < 25000 40 26,200 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
47 58 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Rasananda Sahoo OBC
25001-45000 10 8,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
48 52 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Muralidhar Das Gen
25001-45000 10 24,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
49 69 Disty.No-1 4 Resi
Gangadhar Maharana OBC < 25000 18 45,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
50 71 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Dhirendra Sahoo OBC < 25000 15 39,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
51 75 Disty.No-1 4 Resi Jayanta Panda Gen
65001-85000 50
1,04,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
52 57 Disty.No-1 4 Com
Rabindranath Sahoo OBC < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
53 79 Disty.No-1 4 Com Kunja Panda Gen < 25000 18 12,186 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
54 80 Disty.No-1 4 Com Mitika Kar Gen < 25000 12 11,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
55 88 Disty.No-1 4 Com Jatindra Kar Gen < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
56 94 Disty.No-1 4 Com Parsuram Jena OBC < 25000 12 6,124 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
57 100 Disty.No-1 4 Com Sumanta Sahoo Gen
65001-85000 40 11,080 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
58 110 Disty.No-1 4 Com Dibakar Sahoo SC < 25000 15 11,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
59 15 Disty.No-1 4 Com Chintamani Nayak OBC
25001-45000 15 10,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
60 18 Disty.No-1 4 Com
Krushna Chandra Sahoo Gen < 25000 25 19,750 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
61 19 Disty.No-1 4 Com Rankanidhi Barik OBC < 25000 15 15,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
62 21 Disty.No-1 4 Com
Biranchi Narayan Barik OBC
25001-45000 20 12,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
63 24 Disty.No-1 4 Com Golap Khan Gen < 25000 20 17,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
64 35 Disty.No-1 4 Com Maheswar Behera SC < 25000 35 24,050 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
65 36 Disty.No-1 4 Com Ranjan Satpathy Gen < 25000 20 17,600 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
66 59 Disty.No-1 4 Com Karunakar Das Gen
25001-45000 10 8,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
67 60 Disty.No-1 4 Com Ananta Ku Parida Gen
25001-45000 12 9,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
24
68 61 Disty.No-1 4 Com Sovit Prusty Gen
25001-45000 18 11,740 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
69 81 Disty.No-1 4 Com
Akashya Maharana Gen < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
70 96 Disty.No-1 4 Com Abani Sethy SC < 25000 12 14,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
71 107 Disty.No-1 4 Com Parsuram Sahoo OBC
25001-45000 22 13,460 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
72 16 Disty.No-1 4 Com Bishnu Sahoo Gen < 25000 12 14,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
73 37 Disty.No-1 4 Com Sanatan Pradhan OBC < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
74 40 Disty.No-1 4 Com
Manas Ranjan Swain Gen < 25000 6 11,580 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
75 87 Disty.No-1 4 Com
Kailash Chandra Behera SC
45001-65000 10 8,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 5,000 41,000 41,000
76 97 Disty.No-1 4 Com Keshab Nayak OBC < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
77 102 Disty.No-1 4 Com Gouranga Khuntia Gen < 25000 6 11,580 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
78 103 Disty.No-1 4 Com Ranjan Behera SC < 25000 6 11,580 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
79 104 Disty.No-1 4 Com
Dambarudhar Behera SC < 25000 6 11,580 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
80 106 Disty.No-1 4 Com Bhagabati Sethy SC < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
81 109 Disty.No-1 4 Com Purusottam Sahoo OBC < 25000 15 15,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
82 111 Disty.No-1 4 Com Biswanath Nayak SC < 25000 15 15,450 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
83 20 Disty.No-1 4 Com Khetramani Barik OBC < 25000 25 59,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
84 41 Disty.No-1 4 Com Lokanath Biswal Gen < 25000 25 59,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
Package-4 1434
12,40,664 18,48,000 7,70,000 1,54,000 20,000
27,92,000 28,06,955
85 114
Disty.No-1.B
7 & Others Resi Pabitra Kar Gen < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
86 119
Disty.No-1.C
7 & Others Resi Dhruba Singh OBC < 25000 15 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 51,450
87 115
Disty.No-1.C
7 & Others Resi Prahallad Singh OBC < 25000 20 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 85,000
88 128 Disty.No-4
7 & Others Resi Lali Bibi Gen
25001-45000 25 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 44,425
89 129 Disty.No-4
7 & Others Resi Seikh Kalu Alli Gen < 25000 12 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 47,124
90 142 Disty. 7 & Resi Gania Pradhan OBC 25001- 15 6,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
25
No-4 A
Others 45000
91 143
Disty.No-4 A
7 & Others Resi
Umakanta Pradhan OBC < 25000 18 12,186 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
92 144
Disty.No-4 A
7 & Others Resi Ramesh Pradhan OBC < 25000 15 11,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
93 145
Disty.No-4 A
7 & Others Resi Fakir Pradhan OBC < 25000 18 12,186 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
94 146
Disty.No-4 A
7 & Others Resi Tuna Pradhan OBC < 25000 18 12,186 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
95 147
Disty.No-4 A
7 & Others Resi Srikanta Pradhan OBC
25001-45000 15 6,655 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
96 148
Disty.No-4 A
7 & Others Resi Bhara Pradhan OBC < 25000 16 11,832 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
97 149
Disty.No-4 A
7 & Others Resi Naria Pradhan OBC < 25000 18 12,186 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
98 151
Disty.No-4 A
7 & Others Resi
Dillip Kumar Berma Gen < 25000 10 13,300 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
99 141
Disty.No-4 A
7 & Others Resi Srikanta Sendha Gen < 25000 40 26,200 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
100 150
Disty.No-4 A
7 & Others Resi Ganeswar Gill Gen
65001-85000 50
1,04,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
101 113
Disty.No-1.B
7 & Others Com Narayan Panda Gen < 25000 10 10,770 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
102 117
Disty.No-1.C
7 & Others Com Dhobina Sahoo OBC < 25000 28 0 Not Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 57,040
103 118
Disty.No-1.C
7 & Others Com Dusasan Sathua Gen < 25000 12 14,160 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
104 120
Disty.No-1.C
7 & Others Com Biranchi Nath Gen < 25000 40 89,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
105 121
Disty.No-1.C
7 & Others Com Bidyadhar Sahoo Gen < 25000 40 89,000 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
106 123
Disty.No-2
7 & Others Com Narendra Routray Gen
85001-1 lakh 180 81,400 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
10 124 Disty. 7 & Com Narendra Routray Gen 85001-1 170 77,100 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
26
7 No-2 Others lakh
108 125
Disty.No-2
7 & Others Com Narendra Routray Gen
85001-1 lakh 180 81,400 Paid 24,000 10,000 2,000 - 36,000 36,000
Package-7 & Others 975
6,82,641 5,76,000
2,40,000 48,000 -
8,64,000 9,69,039
Total Packages 2,665
19,78,685 25,92,000
10,80,000 2,16,000 20,000
39,08,000 40,97,624
Internal Monitoring Report-HLC-R-1, (0- 10 km) - Dec 2016
RS, ISPMC
27
Annexure 2: Status of Civil Works Contract in HLC-R-1 Canal Division (0-10 km)
Package No Status of Compensation Status of Contract
Pack-1 100 % compensation paid Contract Awarded
Pack-4 100 % compensation paid Contract Awarded
Pack-7 & Others 100 % compensation paid Contract Awarded