Organizational Change 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    1/17

    ORGANIZATIONAL

    CHANGE

    Triggers of ChangeAny disorganizing pressure arising outsideor inside the organization, indicating thatcurrent arrangements, systems, procedures,rules and other aspects of organization

    structure and process are no longer effective

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    2/17

    External Triggers for

    Organizational Change

    Developments in technology

    Developments in new materials

    Changes in customers requirements and tastes

    Activities and innovations of competitors New legislation and government policies

    Shifts in local, national and international politics

    Changes in social and cultural values

    Changing domestic and global economic and

    trading conditions

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    3/17

    Internal Triggers for

    Organizational Change

    New product and service design innovations

    Innovations in the manufacturing process

    New ideas about how to deliver services to customers

    Low performance and morale, triggering job redesign Appointment of new senior manager or top

    management team

    Inadequate skills and knowledge base, triggeringtraining programmes

    Office and factory relocation, closer to suppliersand markets

    Recognition of problems, triggeringreallocation of responsibilities

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    4/17

    Lewins Three-Step Model

    In some cases, it is better to anticipate

    events and trends, and be proactive in

    introducing appropriate organizational

    changes

    For change to occur, we first need to

    unfreeze the current state of affairs, move

    to the desired new state, and then

    refreeze and stabilize those changes

    Due to constant transformation,

    refreezing no longer seems to be an

    option

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    5/17

    Many organizations now face a high-velocity environment in which turbulent

    and rapidly changing external conditions

    are translated into a complex, multi-faceted, fluid and interlinked stream of

    initiatives affecting work and organization

    design, resource allocation and systems

    and procedures in continuous attempts to

    improve performance. The environmentfor most organizations is likely to remain

    volatile, or become even more turbulent.

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    6/17

    Organizational Change

    -- Challenge or Paradox

    Triggers and consequences are many andcomplex, hence establishing cause andeffect relationship is problematic

    Studying change at different levels iscomplex i.e. individual, group and

    organization levels Change is to be studied as a process a

    series of events unfolding through time

    Change that affects many is difficult to

    evaluate as there may be no agreedcommon criteria on which to base

    judgements

    Change can only be understood fullyin relation to continuity, with respect

    to what has not changed

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    7/17

    Shallow

    Deep

    Deepest

    Fine Tuning:focus on efficiencyRestructure: centralize, decentralize

    Reallocate resources: grow some departments, cut others

    Improve business planning: symbolize a shift in thinking

    Change the leadership: new CEO with major change

    Change the organizations definition of success: create

    new goals, objectives, targets to change behaviour

    Change the mission, vision, values and philosophy:symbolize a radical shift in thinking and behaviour

    Paradigm shift: change how we think, how we solveproblems, how boundaries are defined, the way we do

    business: frame-breaking, mould-breaking, fundamental

    strategic change

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    8/17

    Change and the Individual

    Future Shock The stress and

    disorientation suffered by people when

    they are subjected to too much change

    in too short a time

    Coping Cycle The human response to

    trauma and significant loss, suggesting

    that the individual typically (but not

    always) passes through a series of

    emotional stages, including denial,

    anger, bargaining, depression and

    acceptance

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    9/17

    Coping Cycle

    Denial Unwillingness to confront the

    reality

    Anger Turn accusations on those

    apparently responsible

    Bargaining Attempts to negotiate, to

    mitigate loss

    Depression The reality of loss or

    transition is appreciated

    Acceptance Coming to terms with

    and accepting the situation and its full

    implications

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    10/17

    The Pressure--Performance

    Relationship

    PressureLevel

    Response Experience Performance

    Very low Boredom Low levels of interest,

    challenge & motivation

    Low, acceptable

    Low tomoderate

    Comfort Aroused interest, usedabilities, satisfaction,

    motivation

    Moderate tohigh

    Moderate to

    high

    Stretch Challenge, learning,

    development, pushing the

    limits

    High, above

    expectations

    High to

    unrealistic

    Stress Overload, failure, poor

    health, dysfunctional

    coping behaviour

    Moderate to low

    Extreme Panic Confusion, threat, loss of

    self-confidence, withdrawal

    Low,

    unacceptable

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    11/17

    Implications of Change

    Change implies experimentation andcreation of something new

    It also means discontinuity anddestruction of familiar structures and

    relationships It involves confrontation with the

    unknown and loss of the familiar

    Thus, there might be resistance to

    change an inability or anunwillingness to discuss or to acceptorganizational changes that areperceived in some way damaging orthreatening to the individual

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    12/17

    Sources of Resistance to Change

    Ignorance Failure to understand theproblem

    Comparison Solution is dislikedbecause an alternative is preferred

    Disbelief Feeling that the proposedsolution will not work

    Loss Change has unacceptablepersonal costs

    Inadequacy Rewards from change

    are not sufficient Anxiety Fear of being unable to cope

    with the new situation

    Demolition Change threatens to

    destroy existing social arrangements

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    13/17

    Sources of Resistance to Change (contd.)

    Power cut Sources of influence andcontrol will be eroded

    Contamination New values andpractices are repellent

    Inhibition Willingness to change islow

    Mistrust Management motives forchange are considered suspicious

    Alienation Other interests are more

    highly valued than new proposals Frustration Change will reduce

    power and career opportunities

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    14/17

    Methods for overcoming

    resistance to change

    Education and commitment group meetings,training, counseling, publishing reports

    Participation and involvement collaborationin planning and implementation

    Facilitation and support building awareness,providing help to overcome fears and anxieties

    Negotiation and agreement compromisethrough trading and exchange

    Manipulation and co-optation selective

    dissemination of information; giving well-paid,high status positions to key resistors

    Implicit and explicit coercion use of forceand threats to fire or transfer individuals, or tostifle their promotion and career prospects

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    15/17

    The Change Agent

    A member of the organization seeking to promote,further, support, sponsor, initiate, implement or deliver

    change. Skills required in a change agent are as follows:

    Ability to work independently, without management

    power, sanction and support

    An effective collaborator, able to compete in ways thatenhance cooperation

    Ability to develop high-trust relationships, based on high

    ethical standards

    Self-confidence, tempered with humility

    Respect for the process as well as content of change

    Ability to work across business functions and units,

    multifaceted and ambidextrous

    Willingness to stake reward on results and gain

    satisfaction from success

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    16/17

    Contingency Approach to Change Implementation

    Dunphy & Stace (1990)

    ChangeLeadership

    Incrementalchange

    strategies

    Transformativechange

    strategies

    Collaborative-

    consultative

    modes

    Participative

    evolution minor

    adjustment, timeavailable,

    change is

    favoured

    Charismatic

    transformation

    majoradjustment, little

    time, support for

    radical change

    Directive-coercive

    modes

    Forced evolution minor

    adjustment, time

    available,

    change is

    opposed

    Dictatorialtransformation

    major

    adjustment, no

    time, no support

    for change

  • 7/29/2019 Organizational Change 2012

    17/17

    Kotters Steps to Transforming

    your Organisation (1995)

    1. Establishing a sense of urgency

    2. Forming a powerful guiding coalition

    3. Creating a vision

    4. Communicating the vision5. Empowering others to act on the vision

    6. Planning for and creating short-termwins

    7. Consolidating improvements andproducing still more change

    8. Institutionalising new approaches