32

Opus November

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

NUSA's magazine Opus

Citation preview

Page 1: Opus November

Nov

2012

- R

epor

t an

Inc

iden

t -

Cos

ts o

n C

ampu

s -

Noi

se -

Mor

e

Page 2: Opus November

OPUS WISHES TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE TRADITIONAL CUSTODIANS OF THE LAND THIS BOOK WAS CREATED ON, THE AWABAKAL PEOPLE OF THE PAMBALONG CLAN.

CONTRIBUTORS

DESIGNRosemary Gosper

EDITORRosemary Gosper

CONTRIBUTORSHeather RichardsLewis WisdenKuuluvan LaitoksenDavid KennedyHayley HoworthCaitlin MarshallUoN Labor ClubUoN Liberal Club

CONTENTS2

4

12

17

18

20

22

24

26

28

Your VoiceCosts on Campus survey update

Report an IncidentUpdate on NUSA’s report about violence against international Students

Cuts to Face-to-Face Teaching HoursReport on changes made to Education courses

On Campus LightingReport on the inadequate areas of lighting on campus

Gloria Jeans BoycottDiscussion about the implications of boycotting

Labor Club

Liberal Club

NoiseKuuluvan Laitoksen catches up with Bluejuice

Counselling Updates

The Way It’s Heading...Short Story

Page 3: Opus November

OPUS WISHES TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE TRADITIONAL CUSTODIANS OF THE LAND THIS BOOK WAS CREATED ON, THE AWABAKAL PEOPLE OF THE PAMBALONG CLAN.

CONTRIBUTORS

DESIGNRosemary Gosper

EDITORRosemary Gosper

CONTRIBUTORSHeather RichardsLewis WisdenKuuluvan LaitoksenDavid KennedyHayley HoworthCaitlin MarshallUoN Labor ClubUoN Liberal Club

CONTENTS2

4

12

17

18

20

22

24

26

28

Your VoiceCosts on Campus survey update

Report an IncidentUpdate on NUSA’s report about violence against international Students

Cuts to Face-to-Face Teaching HoursReport on changes made to Education courses

On Campus LightingReport on the inadequate areas of lighting on campus

Gloria Jeans BoycottDiscussion about the implications of boycotting

Labor Club

Liberal Club

NoiseKuuluvan Laitoksen catches up with Bluejuice

Counselling Updates

The Way It’s Heading...Short Story

Page 4: Opus November

YOURVOICENUSA regularly runs surveys to gauge student opinion on different issues. We use the data we collect to add validity to campaigns, giving us greater power to represent you as a student. We also take into account the results when creating and directing the campaigns we run. There is no point campaigning for something if the greater student body is against it - we strive to be relevant and that is only possible with your input.

At the moment we are running three surveys: Costs on Campus, Procastination Survey and the Transport Concession survey. To participate in any of them head to our website, nusa.org.au, and click the relevant icon.

COSTSONCAMPUSEarly in semester 2 2012 NUSA launched the Costs on Campus survey. �is survey is aimed at gauging opinion on all the retail services on campus. Many NUSA council members have heard complaints about the cost and quality of food on campus. It was deceided to launch a survey to determine the opinion of the greater student body.

�e survey is divided into three parts; cost, quality, and service. You can rate the services generally or, if you choose, you can go into depth and rate each indvidual outlet.

So far NUSA has received 117 full responses to the survey. An additional 60 partial responses have been recorded. If you do take the survey

please ensure you �nish it right through to the end or your response cannot be included.

�is survey will be continuing into 2013, so be sure to head to the NUSA website and �ll it out.

Preliminary results indicate that students are generally unhappy with the services o�ered, particulary food.

On the following page is an early snapshot of some of the results from the general section of the survey for those who had used each service. Also included are a selection of comments recieved.

“�ere are very few places on campus where there is decent food at an a�ordable price. �e Hunter building is particularly poorly resourced.”

“Uni Bakehouse is the only place I ever buy food. But constant pies gets a bit blah, so other cheap options would be good too. I'm a full time uni student. �is means I am poor!”

Goods and services seem to either be cheap and nasty or better quality and too expensive. It shouldn't be this way. �e Hunter cafeteria is both expensive and nasty, but other options in the Hunter building don't really exist.

“Alliance Catering prices are way too high for uni students! If the food was decent then it wouldn't be as much of an issue. But really, $7.60 for a small, soggy, tasteless wrap? And taking away the option to have sandwiches made fresh? Bad move uni!”

2

Early in semester 2 2012 NUSA launched the Costs on Campus survey. �is survey is aimed at gauging opinion on all the retail services on campus. Many NUSA council members have heard complaints about the cost and quality of food on campus. It was deceided to launch a survey to determine the opinion of the greater student body.

�e survey is divided into three parts; cost, quality, and service. You can rate the services generally or, if you choose, you can go into depth and rate each indvidual outlet.

So far NUSA has received 117 full responses to the survey. An additional 60 partial responses have been recorded. If you do take the survey

please ensure you �nish it right through to the end or your response cannot be included.

�is survey will be continuing into 2013, so be sure to head to the NUSA website and �ll it out.

Preliminary results indicate that students are generally unhappy with the services o�ered, particulary food.

On the following page is an early snapshot of some of the results from the general section of the survey for those who had used each service. Also included are a selection of comments recieved.

“�ere are very few places on campus where there is decent food at an a�ordable price. �e Hunter building is particularly poorly resourced.”

“Uni Bakehouse is the only place I ever buy food. But constant pies gets a bit blah, so other cheap options would be good too. I'm a full time uni student. �is means I am poor!”

Goods and services seem to either be cheap and nasty or better quality and too expensive. It shouldn't be this way. �e Hunter cafeteria is both expensive and nasty, but other options in the Hunter building don't really exist.

“Alliance Catering prices are way too high for uni students! If the food was decent then it wouldn't be as much of an issue. But really, $7.60 for a small, soggy, tasteless wrap? And taking away the option to have sandwiches made fresh? Bad move uni!”

CostsCrippling (Very expensive, very unreasonable)High (Expensive, unreasonable)Moderate (A�ordable, neutral opinion)Good (Cheap, reasonable)Great (Very cheap)

Food

51%

17%11%

5%

17%

Co�ee & Beverages

26%

12% 9%8%

45%

QualityHorrifyingBadAdequatePretty GoodTotally Awesome

Food

42%

17%

5% 6%

31%

Co�ee & Beverages

49%

6% 6%

38%

“More diversity would be great. After a year on campus - every food outlet just feels like you've done it all before and seems unappetising. But this is secondary to PRICE!!! Food is just way too expensive on campus!!!! (possible exception of bar on the hill - need this kind of service on the Shortland side).”

3

Page 5: Opus November

YOURVOICENUSA regularly runs surveys to gauge student opinion on different issues. We use the data we collect to add validity to campaigns, giving us greater power to represent you as a student. We also take into account the results when creating and directing the campaigns we run. There is no point campaigning for something if the greater student body is against it - we strive to be relevant and that is only possible with your input.

At the moment we are running three surveys: Costs on Campus, Procastination Survey and the Transport Concession survey. To participate in any of them head to our website, nusa.org.au, and click the relevant icon.

COSTSONCAMPUSEarly in semester 2 2012 NUSA launched the Costs on Campus survey. �is survey is aimed at gauging opinion on all the retail services on campus. Many NUSA council members have heard complaints about the cost and quality of food on campus. It was deceided to launch a survey to determine the opinion of the greater student body.

�e survey is divided into three parts; cost, quality, and service. You can rate the services generally or, if you choose, you can go into depth and rate each indvidual outlet.

So far NUSA has received 117 full responses to the survey. An additional 60 partial responses have been recorded. If you do take the survey

please ensure you �nish it right through to the end or your response cannot be included.

�is survey will be continuing into 2013, so be sure to head to the NUSA website and �ll it out.

Preliminary results indicate that students are generally unhappy with the services o�ered, particulary food.

On the following page is an early snapshot of some of the results from the general section of the survey for those who had used each service. Also included are a selection of comments recieved.

“�ere are very few places on campus where there is decent food at an a�ordable price. �e Hunter building is particularly poorly resourced.”

“Uni Bakehouse is the only place I ever buy food. But constant pies gets a bit blah, so other cheap options would be good too. I'm a full time uni student. �is means I am poor!”

Goods and services seem to either be cheap and nasty or better quality and too expensive. It shouldn't be this way. �e Hunter cafeteria is both expensive and nasty, but other options in the Hunter building don't really exist.

“Alliance Catering prices are way too high for uni students! If the food was decent then it wouldn't be as much of an issue. But really, $7.60 for a small, soggy, tasteless wrap? And taking away the option to have sandwiches made fresh? Bad move uni!”

2

Early in semester 2 2012 NUSA launched the Costs on Campus survey. �is survey is aimed at gauging opinion on all the retail services on campus. Many NUSA council members have heard complaints about the cost and quality of food on campus. It was deceided to launch a survey to determine the opinion of the greater student body.

�e survey is divided into three parts; cost, quality, and service. You can rate the services generally or, if you choose, you can go into depth and rate each indvidual outlet.

So far NUSA has received 117 full responses to the survey. An additional 60 partial responses have been recorded. If you do take the survey

please ensure you �nish it right through to the end or your response cannot be included.

�is survey will be continuing into 2013, so be sure to head to the NUSA website and �ll it out.

Preliminary results indicate that students are generally unhappy with the services o�ered, particulary food.

On the following page is an early snapshot of some of the results from the general section of the survey for those who had used each service. Also included are a selection of comments recieved.

“�ere are very few places on campus where there is decent food at an a�ordable price. �e Hunter building is particularly poorly resourced.”

“Uni Bakehouse is the only place I ever buy food. But constant pies gets a bit blah, so other cheap options would be good too. I'm a full time uni student. �is means I am poor!”

Goods and services seem to either be cheap and nasty or better quality and too expensive. It shouldn't be this way. �e Hunter cafeteria is both expensive and nasty, but other options in the Hunter building don't really exist.

“Alliance Catering prices are way too high for uni students! If the food was decent then it wouldn't be as much of an issue. But really, $7.60 for a small, soggy, tasteless wrap? And taking away the option to have sandwiches made fresh? Bad move uni!”

CostsCrippling (Very expensive, very unreasonable)High (Expensive, unreasonable)Moderate (A�ordable, neutral opinion)Good (Cheap, reasonable)Great (Very cheap)

Food

51%

17%11%

5%

17%

Co�ee & Beverages

26%

12% 9%8%

45%

QualityHorrifyingBadAdequatePretty GoodTotally Awesome

Food

42%

17%

5% 6%

31%

Co�ee & Beverages

49%

6% 6%

38%

“More diversity would be great. After a year on campus - every food outlet just feels like you've done it all before and seems unappetising. But this is secondary to PRICE!!! Food is just way too expensive on campus!!!! (possible exception of bar on the hill - need this kind of service on the Shortland side).”

3

Page 6: Opus November

�e International Students Department of Newcastle University Students’ Association (ISD-NUSA) launched an online anonymous module for international students at the University of Newcastle, Australia, to report incidents of verbal abuse and physical assault. �is module was launched in August 2011 remaining live for one year with results taken in August 2012. On Monday 27th August 2012, NUSA published the results of this report.

�e module was launched as a result of attacks against international students in Newcastle, and Australia generally, particularly in 2008-2009. Robberies and muggings are reported by students and there is information available on this. However, international students at Newcastle have frequently spoken of verbal abuse endured in the city to international student representatives. �is module gave students the opportunity to report verbal abuse. �is enables us to begin to understand the extent of this problem and to see whether

particular cohorts of students are targeted, as was hypothesized by international student representatives.

A total of 163 reports from international students were lodged,

123 recordings of incidents of verbal abuse and 40 incidents

of physical assault.

Report an IncidentReport on incidents of verbal abuse and physical assaults against international students over one year.

Europe or South America. Only one incident of physical assault, and no incidents of verbal abuse, was reported by North American students.

�e module was designed to record information on location of incidents, nationality of students, levels of o�cial reporting and student awareness of assistance.

�e majority of reports came from Asian students, with 82.5% of reported physical assaults and 82.9% of reported verbal abuses being from Asian students. Reported incidents against Middle Eastern students are the second most proli�c with no incidents of verbal abuse or physical assaults reported by students from

Rate of reported incidents of verbal abuse by nationality

Rate of reported incidents of physical assualt by nationality

NUSA concludes that international students from Asia and the Middle East appear to be targeted as victims of physical assault and verbal abuse. It is NUSA’s conclusion that the levels of verbal abuse reported in this module against non-white international students support claims within the international student community that these students are the victims of racism and Islamophobia.

Jesmond/Birmingham Gardens and the Callaghan Campus/Shortland area record the greatest number of reports of physical assaults and verbal abuse. NUSA recommends that international students consider living in other areas of Newcastle where possible.

NUSA recommends that local community leaders take responsibility for seeking solutions to the problem in this area through a collaborative process with international student representatives.

�e reports showed a lack of awareness of places which would assist students after an incident and also of report mechanisms. A total of 15% of physical assaults reported in this survey were not reported to anyone and 61% of incidents of verbal abuse were not reported to anyone. NUSA �nds this very concerning as it means that the students have not received support and that the perpetrators may still be at large.

NUSA is concerned that 56% of reported incidents indicated that the victim was not aware that they could seek assistance from the police. Students completing this module also indicated in high numbers that they were unaware they could seek assistance from the University International Student Support O�ce (73%) or NUSA (Grievance O�cer or ISD-NUSA) (58%). NUSA recommends a collaborative approach between the University, the Police, the local community and international student representatives to both investigate the current level of awareness and seek methods to improve it.

�is was a trial module and not all international students were aware of its existence. A number of improvements have been suggested in order to improve the awareness and consequently accuracy of this module for the future. However, to our knowledge, this is the �rst module of its kind in Australia and it provides a damning insight into the negative experiences of some international students studying at the University of Newcastle.

No international student should be the victim of a physical assault or verbal abuse. �is is simply not acceptable and change is needed.

�e International Students Department of Newcastle University Students’ Association (ISD-NUSA) launched an online anonymous module for international students at the University of Newcastle, Australia, to report incidents of verbal abuse and physical assault. �is module was launched in August 2011 remaining live for one year with results taken in August 2012. On Monday 27th August 2012, NUSA published the results of this report.

�e module was launched as a result of attacks against international students in Newcastle, and Australia generally, particularly in 2008-2009. Robberies and muggings are reported by students and there is information available on this. However, international students at Newcastle have frequently spoken of verbal abuse endured in the city to international student representatives. �is module gave students the opportunity to report verbal abuse. �is enables us to begin to understand the extent of this problem and to see whether

particular cohorts of students are targeted, as was hypothesized by international student representatives.

A total of 163 reports from international students were lodged,

123 recordings of incidents of verbal abuse and 40 incidents

of physical assault.

Europe or South America. Only one incident of physical assault, and no incidents of verbal abuse, was reported by North American students.

�e module was designed to record information on location of incidents, nationality of students, levels of o�cial reporting and student awareness of assistance.

�e majority of reports came from Asian students, with 82.5% of reported physical assaults and 82.9% of reported verbal abuses being from Asian students. Reported incidents against Middle Eastern students are the second most proli�c with no incidents of verbal abuse or physical assaults reported by students from

NUSA concludes that international students from Asia and the Middle East appear to be targeted as victims of physical assault and verbal abuse. It is NUSA’s conclusion that the levels of verbal abuse reported in this module against non-white international students support claims within the international student community that these students are the victims of racism and Islamophobia.

Jesmond/Birmingham Gardens and the Callaghan Campus/Shortland area record the greatest number of reports of physical assaults and verbal abuse. NUSA recommends that international students consider living in other areas of Newcastle where possible.

NUSA recommends that local community leaders take responsibility for seeking solutions to the problem in this area through a collaborative process with international student representatives.

�e reports showed a lack of awareness of places which would assist students after an incident and also of report mechanisms. A total of 15% of physical assaults reported in this survey were not reported to anyone and 61% of incidents of verbal abuse were not reported to anyone. NUSA �nds this very concerning as it means that the students have not received support and that the perpetrators may still be at large.

NUSA is concerned that 56% of reported incidents indicated that the victim was not aware that they could seek assistance from the police. Students completing this module also indicated in high numbers that they were unaware they could seek assistance from the University International Student Support O�ce (73%) or NUSA (Grievance O�cer or ISD-NUSA) (58%). NUSA recommends a collaborative approach between the University, the Police, the local community and international student representatives to both investigate the current level of awareness and seek methods to improve it.

�is was a trial module and not all international students were aware of its existence. A number of improvements have been suggested in order to improve the awareness and consequently accuracy of this module for the future. However, to our knowledge, this is the �rst module of its kind in Australia and it provides a damning insight into the negative experiences of some international students studying at the University of Newcastle.

No international student should be the victim of a physical assault or verbal abuse. �is is simply not acceptable and change is needed.

Rates of reported physical assault by location

Rates of reported verbal abuse by location

5

Page 7: Opus November

�e International Students Department of Newcastle University Students’ Association (ISD-NUSA) launched an online anonymous module for international students at the University of Newcastle, Australia, to report incidents of verbal abuse and physical assault. �is module was launched in August 2011 remaining live for one year with results taken in August 2012. On Monday 27th August 2012, NUSA published the results of this report.

�e module was launched as a result of attacks against international students in Newcastle, and Australia generally, particularly in 2008-2009. Robberies and muggings are reported by students and there is information available on this. However, international students at Newcastle have frequently spoken of verbal abuse endured in the city to international student representatives. �is module gave students the opportunity to report verbal abuse. �is enables us to begin to understand the extent of this problem and to see whether

particular cohorts of students are targeted, as was hypothesized by international student representatives.

A total of 163 reports from international students were lodged,

123 recordings of incidents of verbal abuse and 40 incidents

of physical assault.

Europe or South America. Only one incident of physical assault, and no incidents of verbal abuse, was reported by North American students.

�e module was designed to record information on location of incidents, nationality of students, levels of o�cial reporting and student awareness of assistance.

�e majority of reports came from Asian students, with 82.5% of reported physical assaults and 82.9% of reported verbal abuses being from Asian students. Reported incidents against Middle Eastern students are the second most proli�c with no incidents of verbal abuse or physical assaults reported by students from

NUSA concludes that international students from Asia and the Middle East appear to be targeted as victims of physical assault and verbal abuse. It is NUSA’s conclusion that the levels of verbal abuse reported in this module against non-white international students support claims within the international student community that these students are the victims of racism and Islamophobia.

Jesmond/Birmingham Gardens and the Callaghan Campus/Shortland area record the greatest number of reports of physical assaults and verbal abuse. NUSA recommends that international students consider living in other areas of Newcastle where possible.

NUSA recommends that local community leaders take responsibility for seeking solutions to the problem in this area through a collaborative process with international student representatives.

�e reports showed a lack of awareness of places which would assist students after an incident and also of report mechanisms. A total of 15% of physical assaults reported in this survey were not reported to anyone and 61% of incidents of verbal abuse were not reported to anyone. NUSA �nds this very concerning as it means that the students have not received support and that the perpetrators may still be at large.

NUSA is concerned that 56% of reported incidents indicated that the victim was not aware that they could seek assistance from the police. Students completing this module also indicated in high numbers that they were unaware they could seek assistance from the University International Student Support O�ce (73%) or NUSA (Grievance O�cer or ISD-NUSA) (58%). NUSA recommends a collaborative approach between the University, the Police, the local community and international student representatives to both investigate the current level of awareness and seek methods to improve it.

�is was a trial module and not all international students were aware of its existence. A number of improvements have been suggested in order to improve the awareness and consequently accuracy of this module for the future. However, to our knowledge, this is the �rst module of its kind in Australia and it provides a damning insight into the negative experiences of some international students studying at the University of Newcastle.

No international student should be the victim of a physical assault or verbal abuse. �is is simply not acceptable and change is needed.

Rates of reported physical assault by location

Rates of reported verbal abuse by location

5

Page 8: Opus November

Response to our report�ere has been a very strong response and reaction to our report. I can honestly say that I did not foresee the University belittling the victims responses, the Minister for Police calling me a sycophant, being on SBS World News, having to defend designing the module in 7 languages on live radio because a caller thought

“all international students should speak English”, the University releasing a video of international students saying how great the University whilst gaining cross party political support.

We have also had members of the public ring NUSA o�ering support and the Newcastle Herald and MP Tim Owen have probably shown the most local leadership in terms of addressing the underlying issues.

We have called for NSW Police to co-establish a reference group with international students to look for solutions, similar to the group established in Melbourne after the attacks against Indian students.

More international students came forward who had not been aware of the module after our report was released.

NUSA wishes to acknowledge the bravery of those international students who came forward and reported incidents to us and the media. It takes courage to speak out.

In the mediaOur report was published on the 27th August and hit the media on the 28th August. Senator Lee Rhiannon issued a statement supporting our module in which she said:

“While the report's �ndings suggest a worrying trend of racially motivated abuse of international students, the recommendations for community leadership and improved support and reporting o�er real solutions.”

“Too little is known about the extent and the victims of violence against international students. I congratulate NUSA for undertaking this investigation.”

�e story was covered the same day on Triple J, ABC National Radio and the Newcastle Herald. �e following day, Wednesday 29th August, the Australian picked up the story, the Newcastle Herald ran a feature story interviewing four international students. It was in these newspapers that we �rst saw the University’s response to the report.

On �ursday 30th August, SBS came to Newcastle and �lmed for the World News Bulletin.1 �ey �lmed Newcastle State Member, MP Tim Owen who stated:

“We want to get a policy look at it from a NSW Government and then we’ ll look at how we re�ne that down to the local level.”

On the 31st August the Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program on ABC Radio National2 and on 3rd September I was interviewed to give a response.3

Response from UoN – “only 5%”Before I give the University’s response, I shall point out that at no point in the report did we suggest that this is a responsibility of the University. We have maintained that this is a community responsibility; the attacks happen in the community, are perpetrated by members of the community and thus surely any solution must come from the community.

The University responded in a very defensive and reactionary manner, showing a considerable lack of leadership.

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Msr14QM5yjU2 http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/asia/2012-08-31/university-insists-foreign-students-are-safe/10087703 http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/international/radio/program/connect-asia/australian-students-association-defends-survey- alleging-racism/1009834

Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Kevin McConkey responds

Newcastle Herald on 28th August 2012.

“From our knowledge of the sorts of events that have occurred the perpetrators do seem to be a group of teenagers who are perhaps not as well-educated as they could be and not receiving parental guidance that others are receiving,” Professor McConkey, Newcastle Herald 28th August 2012.

‘‘We can’t single out blame on these young folk because it’s a community responsibility.’’

Did you not just place blame on these “young folk”? It is of course very easy to blame teenagers as they are not in a position to readily stand up for themselves.

�e Australian on 29th August 2012.

Deputy vice-chancellor Kevin McConkey said 163 responses represented only 5 per cent of international students. While there was a perception that violence targeted them, statistics did not bear this out.

“Only 5%”. This is why he gets paid around $450,000 a year. [Disclaimer: the current salaries of senior University staff are not available – just the 2011 data. There has been a tendency to receive nice bonuses (a.k.a performance pay) in the past as well

A poll was subsequently launched on the ISD-NUSA safety campaign page about these two responses which gave the following result.

Response to our report�ere has been a very strong response and reaction to our report. I can honestly say that I did not foresee the University belittling the victims responses, the Minister for Police calling me a sycophant, being on SBS World News, having to defend designing the module in 7 languages on live radio because a caller thought

“all international students should speak English”, the University releasing a video of international students saying how great the University whilst gaining cross party political support.

We have also had members of the public ring NUSA o�ering support and the Newcastle Herald and MP Tim Owen have probably shown the most local leadership in terms of addressing the underlying issues.

We have called for NSW Police to co-establish a reference group with international students to look for solutions, similar to the group established in Melbourne after the attacks against Indian students.

More international students came forward who had not been aware of the module after our report was released.

NUSA wishes to acknowledge the bravery of those international students who came forward and reported incidents to us and the media. It takes courage to speak out.

In the mediaOur report was published on the 27th August and hit the media on the 28th August. Senator Lee Rhiannon issued a statement supporting our module in which she said:

“While the report's �ndings suggest a worrying trend of racially motivated abuse of international students, the recommendations for community leadership and improved support and reporting o�er real solutions.”

“Too little is known about the extent and the victims of violence against international students. I congratulate NUSA for undertaking this investigation.”

�e story was covered the same day on Triple J, ABC National Radio and the Newcastle Herald. �e following day, Wednesday 29th August, the Australian picked up the story, the Newcastle Herald ran a feature story interviewing four international students. It was in these newspapers that we �rst saw the University’s response to the report.

On �ursday 30th August, SBS came to Newcastle and �lmed for the World News Bulletin.1 �ey �lmed Newcastle State Member, MP Tim Owen who stated:

“We want to get a policy look at it from a NSW Government and then we’ ll look at how we re�ne that down to the local level.”

On the 31st August the Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program on ABC Radio National2 and on 3rd September I was interviewed to give a response.3

Response from UoN – “only 5%”Before I give the University’s response, I shall point out that at no point in the report did we suggest that this is a responsibility of the University. We have maintained that this is a community responsibility; the attacks happen in the community, are perpetrated by members of the community and thus surely any solution must come from the community.

The University responded in a very defensive and reactionary manner, showing a considerable lack of leadership.

Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Kevin McConkey responds

Newcastle Herald on 28th August 2012.

“From our knowledge of the sorts of events that have occurred the perpetrators do seem to be a group of teenagers who are perhaps not as well-educated as they could be and not receiving parental guidance that others are receiving,” Professor McConkey, Newcastle Herald 28th August 2012.

‘‘We can’t single out blame on these young folk because it’s a community responsibility.’’

Did you not just place blame on these “young folk”? It is of course very easy to blame teenagers as they are not in a position to readily stand up for themselves.

�e Australian on 29th August 2012.

Deputy vice-chancellor Kevin McConkey said 163 responses represented only 5 per cent of international students. While there was a perception that violence targeted them, statistics did not bear this out.

“Only 5%”. This is why he gets paid around $450,000 a year. [Disclaimer: the current salaries of senior University staff are not available – just the 2011 data. There has been a tendency to receive nice bonuses (a.k.a performance pay) in the past as well

A poll was subsequently launched on the ISD-NUSA safety campaign page about these two responses which gave the following result.

Do you think the university’s response to NUSA’s report on violence and racism against international

students is appropriate?

A total of 49 persons responded.

As of the 29th August, only the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Prof. Kevin McConkey had responded. By the end of the week we got the response through the media of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Caroline McMillen.

Vice-Chancellor Prof. Caroline McMillen

In the SBS interview on �ursday 30th August she said:

“We work on all issues raised, great and small, to really ensure that our students have the safest environment.”

�e Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program, on ABC Radio Australia. �e following are some extracts from her speech with comments.

“Well �rstly I should say that was a small survey, it was run by the student group er on campus…”

“�e issues that erm across Australia across the whole international uh world that you know students, uh young people out at night, young people uh in our cities can sometimes engage with groups who uh you know are looking to stir up a bit of trouble.”

I submit that this is shifting the blame on the victims. Also I dispute the truth in this statement. Firstly, many international students who do not live in the city do not go there at night because they do not have the money, are afraid, do not have a transport concession or have other recreational habits.

“It was less than 5% of our student body uh who reported uh those issues. We don’t diminish their seriousness but we do know ourselves uh in our larger surveys and sort of deeper surveys as it were uh rather more have focus, and I’m I’m particularly concerned about, as it were, making certain the environment we have is absolutely safe and secure.”

“It was less than 5%, but we don’t diminish the seriousness.” Think you just did. Besides, did this interview not start with you stating that it was a survey on a small group… NUSA has openly stated that many international students were not aware of the module and some have since come to us reporting incidents. Also, what’s a “deeper survey” when it’s at home?

“We engage consistently, if there are any issues we don’t know about we are always keen to hear them.”

Unless we run a yearlong module and make the results public.

“We have around 3000 international students erm here in Newcastle uh the report talked about 163 responses. We don’t know how many students that refers to, whether some students were reporting more than one time where perhaps somebody had spoken to them on a train or in a shopping centre uh so it’s 163 responses, around more than half of our students are of course from China and Malaysia and Korea, great cultures, great countries. And around a proportion of the responses, were, I think slightly less than that in uh that report.”

So now students are victims in shopping centres and trains? Presumably these are shopping centres and trains in the city at night. Not quite sure where the statements about proportionality are going, but as no data has been released publically it is a little difficult to test it. However, NUSA is almost 100% certain that the proportion of Asian students amongst the international student population was less than 86% across the past year. I mean weren’t at least a total of 500 European and American students present in international student orientations mid-year 2011 and the start of 2012?

“If I could just say that you know over 80% of our international students say in these independent surveys and this is large surveys

that our university experience, their university experience has lived up to their expectations.”

This sounds suspiciously like the International Student Barometer, a national survey undertaken on international students studying in Australia. It had a 17% response rate with 86% indicating they were satisfied with their educational experience. International student representatives have long maintained that being, “overall satisfied with your educational experience” does not preclude a traumatic event during this time. The question is very broad!

�e Vice-Chancellor’s salary has previously been over $600,000 a year. I submit that this response is not worthy of such a salary and shows absolutely no leadership. �e University has been defensive and reactive when they had not even been attacked. Other sta� members within the University have been much more supportive of NUSA’s initiative

In NSW Parliament NUSA President called a “sycophant” by the Minister for Police

�e report was mentioned in the Legislative Council of NSW State Parliament on Tuesday 11th September. �e Hon. Walt Secord asked Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice-President of the Executive Council, the Hon. Michael Gallacher a question without notice about NUSA’s report. �e Minister for Police’s response seemed a little confused [he commended the University for conducting the survey] and he stated that he had spoken, “with representatives from the university in the past to discuss this very issue.” I con�rmed with Mr Secord that the Minister had not spoken to us and so on �ursday 13th September, the Hon. Walt Secord asked the Minister of Police who exactly he spoke to at the University.

Extract from Hansard of 13th September:�e Hon. WALT SECORD: After Tuesday's question time I checked with the president of Newcastle University's student representative association, Ms Heather Richards, who said her organisation had not met with the Minister to discuss racist attacks on international students. With whom did the Minister meet at the University of Newcastle to discuss racist attacks on international students?�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: I will consult my diary and look to see—�e Hon. PENNY SHARPE: You shouldn't have to.�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: Settle down. Just because I have not met some sycophant of Walt's does not mean—

�e point is that whilst in opposition I met the faculty in relation to this problem. I indicated to the House that I have met with representatives from the university and will continue to meet with representatives of the Newcastle community, both law enforcement and otherwise, in relation to a whole host of issues.

I have some points to make about this:

1. I am not a sycophant of the Hon. Walt Secord, having spoken to him only twice at this point.

2. The Minister has made this allegation based on no evidence. The Minister does not know me, or have any knowledge about the relationship between myself and the Hon. Walt Secord apart from Mr Secord’s statement that he had spoken to me about whether or not the Minister had spoken to me.

3. One of the key problems we see is that international students are loathe to report incidents because they do not trust the authorities. The Minister for Police has an implicit responsibility towards the community and is expected to maintain a high standard of behaviour, essentially be an example to the broader community.

4. Insulting a member of the public in Parliament is not behaviour concomitant with the ambassador of law and order. His comments show disrespect towards the students who had the courage to come forward and report an incident. International students are already wary of the authorities and this type of behaviour and comment does nothing to disparage such a viewpoint.

5. The Minister originally explained that he had met with representatives from the University but then stated that he had met with the “faculty”.

6. The Minister indicated that he had met with the “faculty” whilst in opposition – i.e. over a year and half ago, not recently.

The Legislative Council has approved my citizen’s right of reply, which will now form a part of the Hansard record. The Minister for Police also publically apologised in Parliament.

Other responsesFrom Human Rights Commission, MP Tim Owen, Newcastle Lord Mayor candidate Nuatali Nelmes, National Union of Students (NUS) and Council of International Students Australia (CISA)

On 11th September, the Human Rights Commission Race Discrimination Commissioner, Dr Helen Szoke responded to our report.

�e Human Rights Commission has worked with international student representatives over the past couple of years on this issue and Dr. Szoke informed us that they would be launching, “Principles to Promote and Protect the Human Rights of International Students” at the AIEC conference in Melbourne. (�at is a one of the largest conferences during the year relating to the industry around international students). �ey are keen to know if our recommendations are followed up on and whether this improves the situation for international students.

We have connected with the NSW Deputy Police Commissioner to work on establishing a reference group.

On 26th September we met with MP Tim Owen, State Member for Newcastle, to discuss our report and ways forward.

We outlined what had happened and he informed us that upon receipt of our report he sent a hardcopy version straight to the Deputy Premier informing him that this is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with.

He asked us to forward information to him regarding the comments made by the NSW Police Minister, where he called me a sycophant in the Legislative Council.

Tim Owen made it clear that violence and verbal abuse are not acceptable and are not to be

tolerated. We have agreed to forward him information about some of the positive projects those arose from the 2009 reference group established in Melbourne as a result of the attacks against Indian students.

He indicated he shared our view that the University’s, “it’s only 5%” response showed a demonstrable lack of leadership.

Overall, the meeting was productive and we hope that we can move forwards to establishing long-term solutions to the issue.

�e NUS President, Education O�cer and Environment O�cer visited Newcastle on Wednesday 29th August. �ey issued a media release supporting our initiative and were interviewed on the SBS interview.

“�is is a bit of a widespread problem across the entirety of Australia. We need to change attitudes in society so that international students aren’t just being seen as cash cows.”

CISA issued a media releasing supporting our initiative and are considering introducing a national version of our tool.

Nuatali Nelmes o�ered us support early on and along with the other Lord Mayor candidates who attend NUSA’s Lord Mayor Candidate panel, she agreed that she would be interested in being part of any reference group established.

We have also met with Newcastle Ethnic Community Council who noted that this is a big problem in Newcastle.

ConclusionWhilst NUSA’s year long study is unique in that it was a multilingual study run by students in Newcastle, a couple of studies were undertaken in Melbourne in 2010 which gave similar results.

On 17th February 2010, the Age reported that a study of international students in Victoria found that a large majority had experienced threats to their safety. More than 75% reported incidents ranging from verbal abuse to violence. In half of those, students reported a racial, religious or cultural element.

In 2010 the City of Melbourne they surveyed 786 international students in Melbourne. Of those in the survey who indicated they had experienced an incident, 73% indicated they had not reported it.

In 2010 the Human Rights Commission held a workshop on racism, exclusion and poverty: key factors reducing international student safety. In their overview they allude to a study conducted on 200 international students where 50% indicated they had experienced discrimination.

  “Evidence also suggests that some students, particularly those from non-European and non-English speaking backgrounds, experience multiple forms of discrimination in the broader community, including racial hatred and violence.”

All of the above are similar to the results found in NUSA’s study, especially in relation to levels of reporting incidents to the authorities. �is is an area in which all need to work so that students are aware that they can get help.

We still have not received a response from the University. �e Vice-Chancellor has previously threatened us by stating that they would consider any matter we take to the Herald as low priority. �eir media reaction would suggest our report was anything but a low priority – but was probably a major inconvenience.

I do not apologise for NUSA running this module and publishing the results. We will continue to work towards establishing a reference group, look for solutions and encourage international students to report incidents.

Education exports may have been worth over $13.1 billion in 2011, but international students are not lumps of coal.

I do not believe that if Australian students from the University of Newcastle were being assaulted overseas the response seen would be acceptable.

“One physical assault or incident of verbal abuse is not acceptable. �ere is no ‘only 5%’.”

Finally, I reiterate my respect to those international students who have come forward and talked about what has happened to them.

If you have been a victim of an incident then please do not remain silent. You can get assistance from NUSA, the police, the University International Student O�cer and a number of helplines. Even if you do not want to o�cially report it to the police, it is important to talk to someone. It is perfectly normal to experience a delayed reaction to an incident.

Heather Richards2012 NUSA President

7

Page 9: Opus November

Response to our report�ere has been a very strong response and reaction to our report. I can honestly say that I did not foresee the University belittling the victims responses, the Minister for Police calling me a sycophant, being on SBS World News, having to defend designing the module in 7 languages on live radio because a caller thought

“all international students should speak English”, the University releasing a video of international students saying how great the University whilst gaining cross party political support.

We have also had members of the public ring NUSA o�ering support and the Newcastle Herald and MP Tim Owen have probably shown the most local leadership in terms of addressing the underlying issues.

We have called for NSW Police to co-establish a reference group with international students to look for solutions, similar to the group established in Melbourne after the attacks against Indian students.

More international students came forward who had not been aware of the module after our report was released.

NUSA wishes to acknowledge the bravery of those international students who came forward and reported incidents to us and the media. It takes courage to speak out.

In the mediaOur report was published on the 27th August and hit the media on the 28th August. Senator Lee Rhiannon issued a statement supporting our module in which she said:

“While the report's �ndings suggest a worrying trend of racially motivated abuse of international students, the recommendations for community leadership and improved support and reporting o�er real solutions.”

“Too little is known about the extent and the victims of violence against international students. I congratulate NUSA for undertaking this investigation.”

�e story was covered the same day on Triple J, ABC National Radio and the Newcastle Herald. �e following day, Wednesday 29th August, the Australian picked up the story, the Newcastle Herald ran a feature story interviewing four international students. It was in these newspapers that we �rst saw the University’s response to the report.

On �ursday 30th August, SBS came to Newcastle and �lmed for the World News Bulletin.1 �ey �lmed Newcastle State Member, MP Tim Owen who stated:

“We want to get a policy look at it from a NSW Government and then we’ ll look at how we re�ne that down to the local level.”

On the 31st August the Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program on ABC Radio National2 and on 3rd September I was interviewed to give a response.3

Response from UoN – “only 5%”Before I give the University’s response, I shall point out that at no point in the report did we suggest that this is a responsibility of the University. We have maintained that this is a community responsibility; the attacks happen in the community, are perpetrated by members of the community and thus surely any solution must come from the community.

The University responded in a very defensive and reactionary manner, showing a considerable lack of leadership.

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Msr14QM5yjU2 http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/asia/2012-08-31/university-insists-foreign-students-are-safe/10087703 http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/international/radio/program/connect-asia/australian-students-association-defends-survey- alleging-racism/1009834

Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Kevin McConkey responds

Newcastle Herald on 28th August 2012.

“From our knowledge of the sorts of events that have occurred the perpetrators do seem to be a group of teenagers who are perhaps not as well-educated as they could be and not receiving parental guidance that others are receiving,” Professor McConkey, Newcastle Herald 28th August 2012.

‘‘We can’t single out blame on these young folk because it’s a community responsibility.’’

Did you not just place blame on these “young folk”? It is of course very easy to blame teenagers as they are not in a position to readily stand up for themselves.

�e Australian on 29th August 2012.

Deputy vice-chancellor Kevin McConkey said 163 responses represented only 5 per cent of international students. While there was a perception that violence targeted them, statistics did not bear this out.

“Only 5%”. This is why he gets paid around $450,000 a year. [Disclaimer: the current salaries of senior University staff are not available – just the 2011 data. There has been a tendency to receive nice bonuses (a.k.a performance pay) in the past as well

A poll was subsequently launched on the ISD-NUSA safety campaign page about these two responses which gave the following result.

Response to our report�ere has been a very strong response and reaction to our report. I can honestly say that I did not foresee the University belittling the victims responses, the Minister for Police calling me a sycophant, being on SBS World News, having to defend designing the module in 7 languages on live radio because a caller thought

“all international students should speak English”, the University releasing a video of international students saying how great the University whilst gaining cross party political support.

We have also had members of the public ring NUSA o�ering support and the Newcastle Herald and MP Tim Owen have probably shown the most local leadership in terms of addressing the underlying issues.

We have called for NSW Police to co-establish a reference group with international students to look for solutions, similar to the group established in Melbourne after the attacks against Indian students.

More international students came forward who had not been aware of the module after our report was released.

NUSA wishes to acknowledge the bravery of those international students who came forward and reported incidents to us and the media. It takes courage to speak out.

In the mediaOur report was published on the 27th August and hit the media on the 28th August. Senator Lee Rhiannon issued a statement supporting our module in which she said:

“While the report's �ndings suggest a worrying trend of racially motivated abuse of international students, the recommendations for community leadership and improved support and reporting o�er real solutions.”

“Too little is known about the extent and the victims of violence against international students. I congratulate NUSA for undertaking this investigation.”

�e story was covered the same day on Triple J, ABC National Radio and the Newcastle Herald. �e following day, Wednesday 29th August, the Australian picked up the story, the Newcastle Herald ran a feature story interviewing four international students. It was in these newspapers that we �rst saw the University’s response to the report.

On �ursday 30th August, SBS came to Newcastle and �lmed for the World News Bulletin.1 �ey �lmed Newcastle State Member, MP Tim Owen who stated:

“We want to get a policy look at it from a NSW Government and then we’ ll look at how we re�ne that down to the local level.”

On the 31st August the Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program on ABC Radio National2 and on 3rd September I was interviewed to give a response.3

Response from UoN – “only 5%”Before I give the University’s response, I shall point out that at no point in the report did we suggest that this is a responsibility of the University. We have maintained that this is a community responsibility; the attacks happen in the community, are perpetrated by members of the community and thus surely any solution must come from the community.

The University responded in a very defensive and reactionary manner, showing a considerable lack of leadership.

Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Kevin McConkey responds

Newcastle Herald on 28th August 2012.

“From our knowledge of the sorts of events that have occurred the perpetrators do seem to be a group of teenagers who are perhaps not as well-educated as they could be and not receiving parental guidance that others are receiving,” Professor McConkey, Newcastle Herald 28th August 2012.

‘‘We can’t single out blame on these young folk because it’s a community responsibility.’’

Did you not just place blame on these “young folk”? It is of course very easy to blame teenagers as they are not in a position to readily stand up for themselves.

�e Australian on 29th August 2012.

Deputy vice-chancellor Kevin McConkey said 163 responses represented only 5 per cent of international students. While there was a perception that violence targeted them, statistics did not bear this out.

“Only 5%”. This is why he gets paid around $450,000 a year. [Disclaimer: the current salaries of senior University staff are not available – just the 2011 data. There has been a tendency to receive nice bonuses (a.k.a performance pay) in the past as well

A poll was subsequently launched on the ISD-NUSA safety campaign page about these two responses which gave the following result.

Do you think the university’s response to NUSA’s report on violence and racism against international

students is appropriate?

A total of 49 persons responded.

As of the 29th August, only the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Prof. Kevin McConkey had responded. By the end of the week we got the response through the media of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Caroline McMillen.

Vice-Chancellor Prof. Caroline McMillen

In the SBS interview on �ursday 30th August she said:

“We work on all issues raised, great and small, to really ensure that our students have the safest environment.”

�e Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program, on ABC Radio Australia. �e following are some extracts from her speech with comments.

“Well �rstly I should say that was a small survey, it was run by the student group er on campus…”

“�e issues that erm across Australia across the whole international uh world that you know students, uh young people out at night, young people uh in our cities can sometimes engage with groups who uh you know are looking to stir up a bit of trouble.”

I submit that this is shifting the blame on the victims. Also I dispute the truth in this statement. Firstly, many international students who do not live in the city do not go there at night because they do not have the money, are afraid, do not have a transport concession or have other recreational habits.

“It was less than 5% of our student body uh who reported uh those issues. We don’t diminish their seriousness but we do know ourselves uh in our larger surveys and sort of deeper surveys as it were uh rather more have focus, and I’m I’m particularly concerned about, as it were, making certain the environment we have is absolutely safe and secure.”

“It was less than 5%, but we don’t diminish the seriousness.” Think you just did. Besides, did this interview not start with you stating that it was a survey on a small group… NUSA has openly stated that many international students were not aware of the module and some have since come to us reporting incidents. Also, what’s a “deeper survey” when it’s at home?

“We engage consistently, if there are any issues we don’t know about we are always keen to hear them.”

Unless we run a yearlong module and make the results public.

“We have around 3000 international students erm here in Newcastle uh the report talked about 163 responses. We don’t know how many students that refers to, whether some students were reporting more than one time where perhaps somebody had spoken to them on a train or in a shopping centre uh so it’s 163 responses, around more than half of our students are of course from China and Malaysia and Korea, great cultures, great countries. And around a proportion of the responses, were, I think slightly less than that in uh that report.”

So now students are victims in shopping centres and trains? Presumably these are shopping centres and trains in the city at night. Not quite sure where the statements about proportionality are going, but as no data has been released publically it is a little difficult to test it. However, NUSA is almost 100% certain that the proportion of Asian students amongst the international student population was less than 86% across the past year. I mean weren’t at least a total of 500 European and American students present in international student orientations mid-year 2011 and the start of 2012?

“If I could just say that you know over 80% of our international students say in these independent surveys and this is large surveys

that our university experience, their university experience has lived up to their expectations.”

This sounds suspiciously like the International Student Barometer, a national survey undertaken on international students studying in Australia. It had a 17% response rate with 86% indicating they were satisfied with their educational experience. International student representatives have long maintained that being, “overall satisfied with your educational experience” does not preclude a traumatic event during this time. The question is very broad!

�e Vice-Chancellor’s salary has previously been over $600,000 a year. I submit that this response is not worthy of such a salary and shows absolutely no leadership. �e University has been defensive and reactive when they had not even been attacked. Other sta� members within the University have been much more supportive of NUSA’s initiative

In NSW Parliament NUSA President called a “sycophant” by the Minister for Police

�e report was mentioned in the Legislative Council of NSW State Parliament on Tuesday 11th September. �e Hon. Walt Secord asked Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice-President of the Executive Council, the Hon. Michael Gallacher a question without notice about NUSA’s report. �e Minister for Police’s response seemed a little confused [he commended the University for conducting the survey] and he stated that he had spoken, “with representatives from the university in the past to discuss this very issue.” I con�rmed with Mr Secord that the Minister had not spoken to us and so on �ursday 13th September, the Hon. Walt Secord asked the Minister of Police who exactly he spoke to at the University.

Extract from Hansard of 13th September:�e Hon. WALT SECORD: After Tuesday's question time I checked with the president of Newcastle University's student representative association, Ms Heather Richards, who said her organisation had not met with the Minister to discuss racist attacks on international students. With whom did the Minister meet at the University of Newcastle to discuss racist attacks on international students?�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: I will consult my diary and look to see—�e Hon. PENNY SHARPE: You shouldn't have to.�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: Settle down. Just because I have not met some sycophant of Walt's does not mean—

�e point is that whilst in opposition I met the faculty in relation to this problem. I indicated to the House that I have met with representatives from the university and will continue to meet with representatives of the Newcastle community, both law enforcement and otherwise, in relation to a whole host of issues.

I have some points to make about this:

1. I am not a sycophant of the Hon. Walt Secord, having spoken to him only twice at this point.

2. The Minister has made this allegation based on no evidence. The Minister does not know me, or have any knowledge about the relationship between myself and the Hon. Walt Secord apart from Mr Secord’s statement that he had spoken to me about whether or not the Minister had spoken to me.

3. One of the key problems we see is that international students are loathe to report incidents because they do not trust the authorities. The Minister for Police has an implicit responsibility towards the community and is expected to maintain a high standard of behaviour, essentially be an example to the broader community.

4. Insulting a member of the public in Parliament is not behaviour concomitant with the ambassador of law and order. His comments show disrespect towards the students who had the courage to come forward and report an incident. International students are already wary of the authorities and this type of behaviour and comment does nothing to disparage such a viewpoint.

5. The Minister originally explained that he had met with representatives from the University but then stated that he had met with the “faculty”.

6. The Minister indicated that he had met with the “faculty” whilst in opposition – i.e. over a year and half ago, not recently.

The Legislative Council has approved my citizen’s right of reply, which will now form a part of the Hansard record. The Minister for Police also publically apologised in Parliament.

Other responsesFrom Human Rights Commission, MP Tim Owen, Newcastle Lord Mayor candidate Nuatali Nelmes, National Union of Students (NUS) and Council of International Students Australia (CISA)

On 11th September, the Human Rights Commission Race Discrimination Commissioner, Dr Helen Szoke responded to our report.

�e Human Rights Commission has worked with international student representatives over the past couple of years on this issue and Dr. Szoke informed us that they would be launching, “Principles to Promote and Protect the Human Rights of International Students” at the AIEC conference in Melbourne. (�at is a one of the largest conferences during the year relating to the industry around international students). �ey are keen to know if our recommendations are followed up on and whether this improves the situation for international students.

We have connected with the NSW Deputy Police Commissioner to work on establishing a reference group.

On 26th September we met with MP Tim Owen, State Member for Newcastle, to discuss our report and ways forward.

We outlined what had happened and he informed us that upon receipt of our report he sent a hardcopy version straight to the Deputy Premier informing him that this is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with.

He asked us to forward information to him regarding the comments made by the NSW Police Minister, where he called me a sycophant in the Legislative Council.

Tim Owen made it clear that violence and verbal abuse are not acceptable and are not to be

tolerated. We have agreed to forward him information about some of the positive projects those arose from the 2009 reference group established in Melbourne as a result of the attacks against Indian students.

He indicated he shared our view that the University’s, “it’s only 5%” response showed a demonstrable lack of leadership.

Overall, the meeting was productive and we hope that we can move forwards to establishing long-term solutions to the issue.

�e NUS President, Education O�cer and Environment O�cer visited Newcastle on Wednesday 29th August. �ey issued a media release supporting our initiative and were interviewed on the SBS interview.

“�is is a bit of a widespread problem across the entirety of Australia. We need to change attitudes in society so that international students aren’t just being seen as cash cows.”

CISA issued a media releasing supporting our initiative and are considering introducing a national version of our tool.

Nuatali Nelmes o�ered us support early on and along with the other Lord Mayor candidates who attend NUSA’s Lord Mayor Candidate panel, she agreed that she would be interested in being part of any reference group established.

We have also met with Newcastle Ethnic Community Council who noted that this is a big problem in Newcastle.

ConclusionWhilst NUSA’s year long study is unique in that it was a multilingual study run by students in Newcastle, a couple of studies were undertaken in Melbourne in 2010 which gave similar results.

On 17th February 2010, the Age reported that a study of international students in Victoria found that a large majority had experienced threats to their safety. More than 75% reported incidents ranging from verbal abuse to violence. In half of those, students reported a racial, religious or cultural element.

In 2010 the City of Melbourne they surveyed 786 international students in Melbourne. Of those in the survey who indicated they had experienced an incident, 73% indicated they had not reported it.

In 2010 the Human Rights Commission held a workshop on racism, exclusion and poverty: key factors reducing international student safety. In their overview they allude to a study conducted on 200 international students where 50% indicated they had experienced discrimination.

  “Evidence also suggests that some students, particularly those from non-European and non-English speaking backgrounds, experience multiple forms of discrimination in the broader community, including racial hatred and violence.”

All of the above are similar to the results found in NUSA’s study, especially in relation to levels of reporting incidents to the authorities. �is is an area in which all need to work so that students are aware that they can get help.

We still have not received a response from the University. �e Vice-Chancellor has previously threatened us by stating that they would consider any matter we take to the Herald as low priority. �eir media reaction would suggest our report was anything but a low priority – but was probably a major inconvenience.

I do not apologise for NUSA running this module and publishing the results. We will continue to work towards establishing a reference group, look for solutions and encourage international students to report incidents.

Education exports may have been worth over $13.1 billion in 2011, but international students are not lumps of coal.

I do not believe that if Australian students from the University of Newcastle were being assaulted overseas the response seen would be acceptable.

“One physical assault or incident of verbal abuse is not acceptable. �ere is no ‘only 5%’.”

Finally, I reiterate my respect to those international students who have come forward and talked about what has happened to them.

If you have been a victim of an incident then please do not remain silent. You can get assistance from NUSA, the police, the University International Student O�cer and a number of helplines. Even if you do not want to o�cially report it to the police, it is important to talk to someone. It is perfectly normal to experience a delayed reaction to an incident.

Heather Richards2012 NUSA President

7

Page 10: Opus November

As of the 29th August, only the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Prof. Kevin McConkey had responded. By the end of the week we got the response through the media of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Caroline McMillen.

Vice-Chancellor Prof. Caroline McMillen

In the SBS interview on �ursday 30th August she said:

“We work on all issues raised, great and small, to really ensure that our students have the safest environment.”

�e Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program, on ABC Radio Australia. �e following are some extracts from her speech with comments.

“Well �rstly I should say that was a small survey, it was run by the student group er on campus…”

“�e issues that erm across Australia across the whole international uh world that you know students, uh young people out at night, young people uh in our cities can sometimes engage with groups who uh you know are looking to stir up a bit of trouble.”

I submit that this is shifting the blame on the victims. Also I dispute the truth in this statement. Firstly, many international students who do not live in the city do not go there at night because they do not have the money, are afraid, do not have a transport concession or have other recreational habits.

“It was less than 5% of our student body uh who reported uh those issues. We don’t diminish their seriousness but we do know ourselves uh in our larger surveys and sort of deeper surveys as it were uh rather more have focus, and I’m I’m particularly concerned about, as it were, making certain the environment we have is absolutely safe and secure.”

“It was less than 5%, but we don’t diminish the seriousness.” Think you just did. Besides, did this interview not start with you stating that it was a survey on a small group… NUSA has openly stated that many international students were not aware of the module and some have since come to us reporting incidents. Also, what’s a “deeper survey” when it’s at home?

“We engage consistently, if there are any issues we don’t know about we are always keen to hear them.”

Unless we run a yearlong module and make the results public.

“We have around 3000 international students erm here in Newcastle uh the report talked about 163 responses. We don’t know how many students that refers to, whether some students were reporting more than one time where perhaps somebody had spoken to them on a train or in a shopping centre uh so it’s 163 responses, around more than half of our students are of course from China and Malaysia and Korea, great cultures, great countries. And around a proportion of the responses, were, I think slightly less than that in uh that report.”

So now students are victims in shopping centres and trains? Presumably these are shopping centres and trains in the city at night. Not quite sure where the statements about proportionality are going, but as no data has been released publically it is a little difficult to test it. However, NUSA is almost 100% certain that the proportion of Asian students amongst the international student population was less than 86% across the past year. I mean weren’t at least a total of 500 European and American students present in international student orientations mid-year 2011 and the start of 2012?

“If I could just say that you know over 80% of our international students say in these independent surveys and this is large surveys

that our university experience, their university experience has lived up to their expectations.”

This sounds suspiciously like the International Student Barometer, a national survey undertaken on international students studying in Australia. It had a 17% response rate with 86% indicating they were satisfied with their educational experience. International student representatives have long maintained that being, “overall satisfied with your educational experience” does not preclude a traumatic event during this time. The question is very broad!

�e Vice-Chancellor’s salary has previously been over $600,000 a year. I submit that this response is not worthy of such a salary and shows absolutely no leadership. �e University has been defensive and reactive when they had not even been attacked. Other sta� members within the University have been much more supportive of NUSA’s initiative

In NSW Parliament NUSA President called a “sycophant” by the Minister for Police

�e report was mentioned in the Legislative Council of NSW State Parliament on Tuesday 11th September. �e Hon. Walt Secord asked Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice-President of the Executive Council, the Hon. Michael Gallacher a question without notice about NUSA’s report. �e Minister for Police’s response seemed a little confused [he commended the University for conducting the survey] and he stated that he had spoken, “with representatives from the university in the past to discuss this very issue.” I con�rmed with Mr Secord that the Minister had not spoken to us and so on �ursday 13th September, the Hon. Walt Secord asked the Minister of Police who exactly he spoke to at the University.

Extract from Hansard of 13th September:�e Hon. WALT SECORD: After Tuesday's question time I checked with the president of Newcastle University's student representative association, Ms Heather Richards, who said her organisation had not met with the Minister to discuss racist attacks on international students. With whom did the Minister meet at the University of Newcastle to discuss racist attacks on international students?�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: I will consult my diary and look to see—�e Hon. PENNY SHARPE: You shouldn't have to.�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: Settle down. Just because I have not met some sycophant of Walt's does not mean—

�e point is that whilst in opposition I met the faculty in relation to this problem. I indicated to the House that I have met with representatives from the university and will continue to meet with representatives of the Newcastle community, both law enforcement and otherwise, in relation to a whole host of issues.

I have some points to make about this:

1. I am not a sycophant of the Hon. Walt Secord, having spoken to him only twice at this point.

2. The Minister has made this allegation based on no evidence. The Minister does not know me, or have any knowledge about the relationship between myself and the Hon. Walt Secord apart from Mr Secord’s statement that he had spoken to me about whether or not the Minister had spoken to me.

3. One of the key problems we see is that international students are loathe to report incidents because they do not trust the authorities. The Minister for Police has an implicit responsibility towards the community and is expected to maintain a high standard of behaviour, essentially be an example to the broader community.

4. Insulting a member of the public in Parliament is not behaviour concomitant with the ambassador of law and order. His comments show disrespect towards the students who had the courage to come forward and report an incident. International students are already wary of the authorities and this type of behaviour and comment does nothing to disparage such a viewpoint.

5. The Minister originally explained that he had met with representatives from the University but then stated that he had met with the “faculty”.

6. The Minister indicated that he had met with the “faculty” whilst in opposition – i.e. over a year and half ago, not recently.

The Legislative Council has approved my citizen’s right of reply, which will now form a part of the Hansard record. The Minister for Police also publically apologised in Parliament.

Other responsesFrom Human Rights Commission, MP Tim Owen, Newcastle Lord Mayor candidate Nuatali Nelmes, National Union of Students (NUS) and Council of International Students Australia (CISA)

On 11th September, the Human Rights Commission Race Discrimination Commissioner, Dr Helen Szoke responded to our report.

�e Human Rights Commission has worked with international student representatives over the past couple of years on this issue and Dr. Szoke informed us that they would be launching, “Principles to Promote and Protect the Human Rights of International Students” at the AIEC conference in Melbourne. (�at is a one of the largest conferences during the year relating to the industry around international students). �ey are keen to know if our recommendations are followed up on and whether this improves the situation for international students.

We have connected with the NSW Deputy Police Commissioner to work on establishing a reference group.

On 26th September we met with MP Tim Owen, State Member for Newcastle, to discuss our report and ways forward.

We outlined what had happened and he informed us that upon receipt of our report he sent a hardcopy version straight to the Deputy Premier informing him that this is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with.

He asked us to forward information to him regarding the comments made by the NSW Police Minister, where he called me a sycophant in the Legislative Council.

Tim Owen made it clear that violence and verbal abuse are not acceptable and are not to be

tolerated. We have agreed to forward him information about some of the positive projects those arose from the 2009 reference group established in Melbourne as a result of the attacks against Indian students.

He indicated he shared our view that the University’s, “it’s only 5%” response showed a demonstrable lack of leadership.

Overall, the meeting was productive and we hope that we can move forwards to establishing long-term solutions to the issue.

�e NUS President, Education O�cer and Environment O�cer visited Newcastle on Wednesday 29th August. �ey issued a media release supporting our initiative and were interviewed on the SBS interview.

“�is is a bit of a widespread problem across the entirety of Australia. We need to change attitudes in society so that international students aren’t just being seen as cash cows.”

CISA issued a media releasing supporting our initiative and are considering introducing a national version of our tool.

Nuatali Nelmes o�ered us support early on and along with the other Lord Mayor candidates who attend NUSA’s Lord Mayor Candidate panel, she agreed that she would be interested in being part of any reference group established.

We have also met with Newcastle Ethnic Community Council who noted that this is a big problem in Newcastle.

ConclusionWhilst NUSA’s year long study is unique in that it was a multilingual study run by students in Newcastle, a couple of studies were undertaken in Melbourne in 2010 which gave similar results.

On 17th February 2010, the Age reported that a study of international students in Victoria found that a large majority had experienced threats to their safety. More than 75% reported incidents ranging from verbal abuse to violence. In half of those, students reported a racial, religious or cultural element.

In 2010 the City of Melbourne they surveyed 786 international students in Melbourne. Of those in the survey who indicated they had experienced an incident, 73% indicated they had not reported it.

In 2010 the Human Rights Commission held a workshop on racism, exclusion and poverty: key factors reducing international student safety. In their overview they allude to a study conducted on 200 international students where 50% indicated they had experienced discrimination.

  “Evidence also suggests that some students, particularly those from non-European and non-English speaking backgrounds, experience multiple forms of discrimination in the broader community, including racial hatred and violence.”

All of the above are similar to the results found in NUSA’s study, especially in relation to levels of reporting incidents to the authorities. �is is an area in which all need to work so that students are aware that they can get help.

We still have not received a response from the University. �e Vice-Chancellor has previously threatened us by stating that they would consider any matter we take to the Herald as low priority. �eir media reaction would suggest our report was anything but a low priority – but was probably a major inconvenience.

I do not apologise for NUSA running this module and publishing the results. We will continue to work towards establishing a reference group, look for solutions and encourage international students to report incidents.

Education exports may have been worth over $13.1 billion in 2011, but international students are not lumps of coal.

I do not believe that if Australian students from the University of Newcastle were being assaulted overseas the response seen would be acceptable.

“One physical assault or incident of verbal abuse is not acceptable. �ere is no ‘only 5%’.”

Finally, I reiterate my respect to those international students who have come forward and talked about what has happened to them.

If you have been a victim of an incident then please do not remain silent. You can get assistance from NUSA, the police, the University International Student O�cer and a number of helplines. Even if you do not want to o�cially report it to the police, it is important to talk to someone. It is perfectly normal to experience a delayed reaction to an incident.

Heather Richards2012 NUSA President

8

As of the 29th August, only the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Prof. Kevin McConkey had responded. By the end of the week we got the response through the media of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Caroline McMillen.

Vice-Chancellor Prof. Caroline McMillen

In the SBS interview on �ursday 30th August she said:

“We work on all issues raised, great and small, to really ensure that our students have the safest environment.”

�e Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program, on ABC Radio Australia. �e following are some extracts from her speech with comments.

“Well �rstly I should say that was a small survey, it was run by the student group er on campus…”

“�e issues that erm across Australia across the whole international uh world that you know students, uh young people out at night, young people uh in our cities can sometimes engage with groups who uh you know are looking to stir up a bit of trouble.”

I submit that this is shifting the blame on the victims. Also I dispute the truth in this statement. Firstly, many international students who do not live in the city do not go there at night because they do not have the money, are afraid, do not have a transport concession or have other recreational habits.

“It was less than 5% of our student body uh who reported uh those issues. We don’t diminish their seriousness but we do know ourselves uh in our larger surveys and sort of deeper surveys as it were uh rather more have focus, and I’m I’m particularly concerned about, as it were, making certain the environment we have is absolutely safe and secure.”

“It was less than 5%, but we don’t diminish the seriousness.” Think you just did. Besides, did this interview not start with you stating that it was a survey on a small group… NUSA has openly stated that many international students were not aware of the module and some have since come to us reporting incidents. Also, what’s a “deeper survey” when it’s at home?

“We engage consistently, if there are any issues we don’t know about we are always keen to hear them.”

Unless we run a yearlong module and make the results public.

“We have around 3000 international students erm here in Newcastle uh the report talked about 163 responses. We don’t know how many students that refers to, whether some students were reporting more than one time where perhaps somebody had spoken to them on a train or in a shopping centre uh so it’s 163 responses, around more than half of our students are of course from China and Malaysia and Korea, great cultures, great countries. And around a proportion of the responses, were, I think slightly less than that in uh that report.”

So now students are victims in shopping centres and trains? Presumably these are shopping centres and trains in the city at night. Not quite sure where the statements about proportionality are going, but as no data has been released publically it is a little difficult to test it. However, NUSA is almost 100% certain that the proportion of Asian students amongst the international student population was less than 86% across the past year. I mean weren’t at least a total of 500 European and American students present in international student orientations mid-year 2011 and the start of 2012?

“If I could just say that you know over 80% of our international students say in these independent surveys and this is large surveys

that our university experience, their university experience has lived up to their expectations.”

This sounds suspiciously like the International Student Barometer, a national survey undertaken on international students studying in Australia. It had a 17% response rate with 86% indicating they were satisfied with their educational experience. International student representatives have long maintained that being, “overall satisfied with your educational experience” does not preclude a traumatic event during this time. The question is very broad!

�e Vice-Chancellor’s salary has previously been over $600,000 a year. I submit that this response is not worthy of such a salary and shows absolutely no leadership. �e University has been defensive and reactive when they had not even been attacked. Other sta� members within the University have been much more supportive of NUSA’s initiative

In NSW Parliament NUSA President called a “sycophant” by the Minister for Police

�e report was mentioned in the Legislative Council of NSW State Parliament on Tuesday 11th September. �e Hon. Walt Secord asked Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice-President of the Executive Council, the Hon. Michael Gallacher a question without notice about NUSA’s report. �e Minister for Police’s response seemed a little confused [he commended the University for conducting the survey] and he stated that he had spoken, “with representatives from the university in the past to discuss this very issue.” I con�rmed with Mr Secord that the Minister had not spoken to us and so on �ursday 13th September, the Hon. Walt Secord asked the Minister of Police who exactly he spoke to at the University.

Extract from Hansard of 13th September:�e Hon. WALT SECORD: After Tuesday's question time I checked with the president of Newcastle University's student representative association, Ms Heather Richards, who said her organisation had not met with the Minister to discuss racist attacks on international students. With whom did the Minister meet at the University of Newcastle to discuss racist attacks on international students?�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: I will consult my diary and look to see—�e Hon. PENNY SHARPE: You shouldn't have to.�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: Settle down. Just because I have not met some sycophant of Walt's does not mean—

�e point is that whilst in opposition I met the faculty in relation to this problem. I indicated to the House that I have met with representatives from the university and will continue to meet with representatives of the Newcastle community, both law enforcement and otherwise, in relation to a whole host of issues.

I have some points to make about this:

1. I am not a sycophant of the Hon. Walt Secord, having spoken to him only twice at this point.

2. The Minister has made this allegation based on no evidence. The Minister does not know me, or have any knowledge about the relationship between myself and the Hon. Walt Secord apart from Mr Secord’s statement that he had spoken to me about whether or not the Minister had spoken to me.

3. One of the key problems we see is that international students are loathe to report incidents because they do not trust the authorities. The Minister for Police has an implicit responsibility towards the community and is expected to maintain a high standard of behaviour, essentially be an example to the broader community.

4. Insulting a member of the public in Parliament is not behaviour concomitant with the ambassador of law and order. His comments show disrespect towards the students who had the courage to come forward and report an incident. International students are already wary of the authorities and this type of behaviour and comment does nothing to disparage such a viewpoint.

5. The Minister originally explained that he had met with representatives from the University but then stated that he had met with the “faculty”.

6. The Minister indicated that he had met with the “faculty” whilst in opposition – i.e. over a year and half ago, not recently.

The Legislative Council has approved my citizen’s right of reply, which will now form a part of the Hansard record. The Minister for Police also publically apologised in Parliament.

Other responsesFrom Human Rights Commission, MP Tim Owen, Newcastle Lord Mayor candidate Nuatali Nelmes, National Union of Students (NUS) and Council of International Students Australia (CISA)

On 11th September, the Human Rights Commission Race Discrimination Commissioner, Dr Helen Szoke responded to our report.

�e Human Rights Commission has worked with international student representatives over the past couple of years on this issue and Dr. Szoke informed us that they would be launching, “Principles to Promote and Protect the Human Rights of International Students” at the AIEC conference in Melbourne. (�at is a one of the largest conferences during the year relating to the industry around international students). �ey are keen to know if our recommendations are followed up on and whether this improves the situation for international students.

We have connected with the NSW Deputy Police Commissioner to work on establishing a reference group.

On 26th September we met with MP Tim Owen, State Member for Newcastle, to discuss our report and ways forward.

We outlined what had happened and he informed us that upon receipt of our report he sent a hardcopy version straight to the Deputy Premier informing him that this is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with.

He asked us to forward information to him regarding the comments made by the NSW Police Minister, where he called me a sycophant in the Legislative Council.

Tim Owen made it clear that violence and verbal abuse are not acceptable and are not to be

tolerated. We have agreed to forward him information about some of the positive projects those arose from the 2009 reference group established in Melbourne as a result of the attacks against Indian students.

He indicated he shared our view that the University’s, “it’s only 5%” response showed a demonstrable lack of leadership.

Overall, the meeting was productive and we hope that we can move forwards to establishing long-term solutions to the issue.

�e NUS President, Education O�cer and Environment O�cer visited Newcastle on Wednesday 29th August. �ey issued a media release supporting our initiative and were interviewed on the SBS interview.

“�is is a bit of a widespread problem across the entirety of Australia. We need to change attitudes in society so that international students aren’t just being seen as cash cows.”

CISA issued a media releasing supporting our initiative and are considering introducing a national version of our tool.

Nuatali Nelmes o�ered us support early on and along with the other Lord Mayor candidates who attend NUSA’s Lord Mayor Candidate panel, she agreed that she would be interested in being part of any reference group established.

We have also met with Newcastle Ethnic Community Council who noted that this is a big problem in Newcastle.

ConclusionWhilst NUSA’s year long study is unique in that it was a multilingual study run by students in Newcastle, a couple of studies were undertaken in Melbourne in 2010 which gave similar results.

On 17th February 2010, the Age reported that a study of international students in Victoria found that a large majority had experienced threats to their safety. More than 75% reported incidents ranging from verbal abuse to violence. In half of those, students reported a racial, religious or cultural element.

In 2010 the City of Melbourne they surveyed 786 international students in Melbourne. Of those in the survey who indicated they had experienced an incident, 73% indicated they had not reported it.

In 2010 the Human Rights Commission held a workshop on racism, exclusion and poverty: key factors reducing international student safety. In their overview they allude to a study conducted on 200 international students where 50% indicated they had experienced discrimination.

  “Evidence also suggests that some students, particularly those from non-European and non-English speaking backgrounds, experience multiple forms of discrimination in the broader community, including racial hatred and violence.”

All of the above are similar to the results found in NUSA’s study, especially in relation to levels of reporting incidents to the authorities. �is is an area in which all need to work so that students are aware that they can get help.

We still have not received a response from the University. �e Vice-Chancellor has previously threatened us by stating that they would consider any matter we take to the Herald as low priority. �eir media reaction would suggest our report was anything but a low priority – but was probably a major inconvenience.

I do not apologise for NUSA running this module and publishing the results. We will continue to work towards establishing a reference group, look for solutions and encourage international students to report incidents.

Education exports may have been worth over $13.1 billion in 2011, but international students are not lumps of coal.

I do not believe that if Australian students from the University of Newcastle were being assaulted overseas the response seen would be acceptable.

“One physical assault or incident of verbal abuse is not acceptable. �ere is no ‘only 5%’.”

Finally, I reiterate my respect to those international students who have come forward and talked about what has happened to them.

If you have been a victim of an incident then please do not remain silent. You can get assistance from NUSA, the police, the University International Student O�cer and a number of helplines. Even if you do not want to o�cially report it to the police, it is important to talk to someone. It is perfectly normal to experience a delayed reaction to an incident.

Heather Richards2012 NUSA President

9

Newcastle Herald 16/11/12

Page 11: Opus November

As of the 29th August, only the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Prof. Kevin McConkey had responded. By the end of the week we got the response through the media of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Caroline McMillen.

Vice-Chancellor Prof. Caroline McMillen

In the SBS interview on �ursday 30th August she said:

“We work on all issues raised, great and small, to really ensure that our students have the safest environment.”

�e Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program, on ABC Radio Australia. �e following are some extracts from her speech with comments.

“Well �rstly I should say that was a small survey, it was run by the student group er on campus…”

“�e issues that erm across Australia across the whole international uh world that you know students, uh young people out at night, young people uh in our cities can sometimes engage with groups who uh you know are looking to stir up a bit of trouble.”

I submit that this is shifting the blame on the victims. Also I dispute the truth in this statement. Firstly, many international students who do not live in the city do not go there at night because they do not have the money, are afraid, do not have a transport concession or have other recreational habits.

“It was less than 5% of our student body uh who reported uh those issues. We don’t diminish their seriousness but we do know ourselves uh in our larger surveys and sort of deeper surveys as it were uh rather more have focus, and I’m I’m particularly concerned about, as it were, making certain the environment we have is absolutely safe and secure.”

“It was less than 5%, but we don’t diminish the seriousness.” Think you just did. Besides, did this interview not start with you stating that it was a survey on a small group… NUSA has openly stated that many international students were not aware of the module and some have since come to us reporting incidents. Also, what’s a “deeper survey” when it’s at home?

“We engage consistently, if there are any issues we don’t know about we are always keen to hear them.”

Unless we run a yearlong module and make the results public.

“We have around 3000 international students erm here in Newcastle uh the report talked about 163 responses. We don’t know how many students that refers to, whether some students were reporting more than one time where perhaps somebody had spoken to them on a train or in a shopping centre uh so it’s 163 responses, around more than half of our students are of course from China and Malaysia and Korea, great cultures, great countries. And around a proportion of the responses, were, I think slightly less than that in uh that report.”

So now students are victims in shopping centres and trains? Presumably these are shopping centres and trains in the city at night. Not quite sure where the statements about proportionality are going, but as no data has been released publically it is a little difficult to test it. However, NUSA is almost 100% certain that the proportion of Asian students amongst the international student population was less than 86% across the past year. I mean weren’t at least a total of 500 European and American students present in international student orientations mid-year 2011 and the start of 2012?

“If I could just say that you know over 80% of our international students say in these independent surveys and this is large surveys

that our university experience, their university experience has lived up to their expectations.”

This sounds suspiciously like the International Student Barometer, a national survey undertaken on international students studying in Australia. It had a 17% response rate with 86% indicating they were satisfied with their educational experience. International student representatives have long maintained that being, “overall satisfied with your educational experience” does not preclude a traumatic event during this time. The question is very broad!

�e Vice-Chancellor’s salary has previously been over $600,000 a year. I submit that this response is not worthy of such a salary and shows absolutely no leadership. �e University has been defensive and reactive when they had not even been attacked. Other sta� members within the University have been much more supportive of NUSA’s initiative

In NSW Parliament NUSA President called a “sycophant” by the Minister for Police

�e report was mentioned in the Legislative Council of NSW State Parliament on Tuesday 11th September. �e Hon. Walt Secord asked Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice-President of the Executive Council, the Hon. Michael Gallacher a question without notice about NUSA’s report. �e Minister for Police’s response seemed a little confused [he commended the University for conducting the survey] and he stated that he had spoken, “with representatives from the university in the past to discuss this very issue.” I con�rmed with Mr Secord that the Minister had not spoken to us and so on �ursday 13th September, the Hon. Walt Secord asked the Minister of Police who exactly he spoke to at the University.

Extract from Hansard of 13th September:�e Hon. WALT SECORD: After Tuesday's question time I checked with the president of Newcastle University's student representative association, Ms Heather Richards, who said her organisation had not met with the Minister to discuss racist attacks on international students. With whom did the Minister meet at the University of Newcastle to discuss racist attacks on international students?�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: I will consult my diary and look to see—�e Hon. PENNY SHARPE: You shouldn't have to.�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: Settle down. Just because I have not met some sycophant of Walt's does not mean—

�e point is that whilst in opposition I met the faculty in relation to this problem. I indicated to the House that I have met with representatives from the university and will continue to meet with representatives of the Newcastle community, both law enforcement and otherwise, in relation to a whole host of issues.

I have some points to make about this:

1. I am not a sycophant of the Hon. Walt Secord, having spoken to him only twice at this point.

2. The Minister has made this allegation based on no evidence. The Minister does not know me, or have any knowledge about the relationship between myself and the Hon. Walt Secord apart from Mr Secord’s statement that he had spoken to me about whether or not the Minister had spoken to me.

3. One of the key problems we see is that international students are loathe to report incidents because they do not trust the authorities. The Minister for Police has an implicit responsibility towards the community and is expected to maintain a high standard of behaviour, essentially be an example to the broader community.

4. Insulting a member of the public in Parliament is not behaviour concomitant with the ambassador of law and order. His comments show disrespect towards the students who had the courage to come forward and report an incident. International students are already wary of the authorities and this type of behaviour and comment does nothing to disparage such a viewpoint.

5. The Minister originally explained that he had met with representatives from the University but then stated that he had met with the “faculty”.

6. The Minister indicated that he had met with the “faculty” whilst in opposition – i.e. over a year and half ago, not recently.

The Legislative Council has approved my citizen’s right of reply, which will now form a part of the Hansard record. The Minister for Police also publically apologised in Parliament.

Other responsesFrom Human Rights Commission, MP Tim Owen, Newcastle Lord Mayor candidate Nuatali Nelmes, National Union of Students (NUS) and Council of International Students Australia (CISA)

On 11th September, the Human Rights Commission Race Discrimination Commissioner, Dr Helen Szoke responded to our report.

�e Human Rights Commission has worked with international student representatives over the past couple of years on this issue and Dr. Szoke informed us that they would be launching, “Principles to Promote and Protect the Human Rights of International Students” at the AIEC conference in Melbourne. (�at is a one of the largest conferences during the year relating to the industry around international students). �ey are keen to know if our recommendations are followed up on and whether this improves the situation for international students.

We have connected with the NSW Deputy Police Commissioner to work on establishing a reference group.

On 26th September we met with MP Tim Owen, State Member for Newcastle, to discuss our report and ways forward.

We outlined what had happened and he informed us that upon receipt of our report he sent a hardcopy version straight to the Deputy Premier informing him that this is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with.

He asked us to forward information to him regarding the comments made by the NSW Police Minister, where he called me a sycophant in the Legislative Council.

Tim Owen made it clear that violence and verbal abuse are not acceptable and are not to be

tolerated. We have agreed to forward him information about some of the positive projects those arose from the 2009 reference group established in Melbourne as a result of the attacks against Indian students.

He indicated he shared our view that the University’s, “it’s only 5%” response showed a demonstrable lack of leadership.

Overall, the meeting was productive and we hope that we can move forwards to establishing long-term solutions to the issue.

�e NUS President, Education O�cer and Environment O�cer visited Newcastle on Wednesday 29th August. �ey issued a media release supporting our initiative and were interviewed on the SBS interview.

“�is is a bit of a widespread problem across the entirety of Australia. We need to change attitudes in society so that international students aren’t just being seen as cash cows.”

CISA issued a media releasing supporting our initiative and are considering introducing a national version of our tool.

Nuatali Nelmes o�ered us support early on and along with the other Lord Mayor candidates who attend NUSA’s Lord Mayor Candidate panel, she agreed that she would be interested in being part of any reference group established.

We have also met with Newcastle Ethnic Community Council who noted that this is a big problem in Newcastle.

ConclusionWhilst NUSA’s year long study is unique in that it was a multilingual study run by students in Newcastle, a couple of studies were undertaken in Melbourne in 2010 which gave similar results.

On 17th February 2010, the Age reported that a study of international students in Victoria found that a large majority had experienced threats to their safety. More than 75% reported incidents ranging from verbal abuse to violence. In half of those, students reported a racial, religious or cultural element.

In 2010 the City of Melbourne they surveyed 786 international students in Melbourne. Of those in the survey who indicated they had experienced an incident, 73% indicated they had not reported it.

In 2010 the Human Rights Commission held a workshop on racism, exclusion and poverty: key factors reducing international student safety. In their overview they allude to a study conducted on 200 international students where 50% indicated they had experienced discrimination.

  “Evidence also suggests that some students, particularly those from non-European and non-English speaking backgrounds, experience multiple forms of discrimination in the broader community, including racial hatred and violence.”

All of the above are similar to the results found in NUSA’s study, especially in relation to levels of reporting incidents to the authorities. �is is an area in which all need to work so that students are aware that they can get help.

We still have not received a response from the University. �e Vice-Chancellor has previously threatened us by stating that they would consider any matter we take to the Herald as low priority. �eir media reaction would suggest our report was anything but a low priority – but was probably a major inconvenience.

I do not apologise for NUSA running this module and publishing the results. We will continue to work towards establishing a reference group, look for solutions and encourage international students to report incidents.

Education exports may have been worth over $13.1 billion in 2011, but international students are not lumps of coal.

I do not believe that if Australian students from the University of Newcastle were being assaulted overseas the response seen would be acceptable.

“One physical assault or incident of verbal abuse is not acceptable. �ere is no ‘only 5%’.”

Finally, I reiterate my respect to those international students who have come forward and talked about what has happened to them.

If you have been a victim of an incident then please do not remain silent. You can get assistance from NUSA, the police, the University International Student O�cer and a number of helplines. Even if you do not want to o�cially report it to the police, it is important to talk to someone. It is perfectly normal to experience a delayed reaction to an incident.

Heather Richards2012 NUSA President

8

As of the 29th August, only the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Prof. Kevin McConkey had responded. By the end of the week we got the response through the media of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Caroline McMillen.

Vice-Chancellor Prof. Caroline McMillen

In the SBS interview on �ursday 30th August she said:

“We work on all issues raised, great and small, to really ensure that our students have the safest environment.”

�e Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program, on ABC Radio Australia. �e following are some extracts from her speech with comments.

“Well �rstly I should say that was a small survey, it was run by the student group er on campus…”

“�e issues that erm across Australia across the whole international uh world that you know students, uh young people out at night, young people uh in our cities can sometimes engage with groups who uh you know are looking to stir up a bit of trouble.”

I submit that this is shifting the blame on the victims. Also I dispute the truth in this statement. Firstly, many international students who do not live in the city do not go there at night because they do not have the money, are afraid, do not have a transport concession or have other recreational habits.

“It was less than 5% of our student body uh who reported uh those issues. We don’t diminish their seriousness but we do know ourselves uh in our larger surveys and sort of deeper surveys as it were uh rather more have focus, and I’m I’m particularly concerned about, as it were, making certain the environment we have is absolutely safe and secure.”

“It was less than 5%, but we don’t diminish the seriousness.” Think you just did. Besides, did this interview not start with you stating that it was a survey on a small group… NUSA has openly stated that many international students were not aware of the module and some have since come to us reporting incidents. Also, what’s a “deeper survey” when it’s at home?

“We engage consistently, if there are any issues we don’t know about we are always keen to hear them.”

Unless we run a yearlong module and make the results public.

“We have around 3000 international students erm here in Newcastle uh the report talked about 163 responses. We don’t know how many students that refers to, whether some students were reporting more than one time where perhaps somebody had spoken to them on a train or in a shopping centre uh so it’s 163 responses, around more than half of our students are of course from China and Malaysia and Korea, great cultures, great countries. And around a proportion of the responses, were, I think slightly less than that in uh that report.”

So now students are victims in shopping centres and trains? Presumably these are shopping centres and trains in the city at night. Not quite sure where the statements about proportionality are going, but as no data has been released publically it is a little difficult to test it. However, NUSA is almost 100% certain that the proportion of Asian students amongst the international student population was less than 86% across the past year. I mean weren’t at least a total of 500 European and American students present in international student orientations mid-year 2011 and the start of 2012?

“If I could just say that you know over 80% of our international students say in these independent surveys and this is large surveys

that our university experience, their university experience has lived up to their expectations.”

This sounds suspiciously like the International Student Barometer, a national survey undertaken on international students studying in Australia. It had a 17% response rate with 86% indicating they were satisfied with their educational experience. International student representatives have long maintained that being, “overall satisfied with your educational experience” does not preclude a traumatic event during this time. The question is very broad!

�e Vice-Chancellor’s salary has previously been over $600,000 a year. I submit that this response is not worthy of such a salary and shows absolutely no leadership. �e University has been defensive and reactive when they had not even been attacked. Other sta� members within the University have been much more supportive of NUSA’s initiative

In NSW Parliament NUSA President called a “sycophant” by the Minister for Police

�e report was mentioned in the Legislative Council of NSW State Parliament on Tuesday 11th September. �e Hon. Walt Secord asked Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice-President of the Executive Council, the Hon. Michael Gallacher a question without notice about NUSA’s report. �e Minister for Police’s response seemed a little confused [he commended the University for conducting the survey] and he stated that he had spoken, “with representatives from the university in the past to discuss this very issue.” I con�rmed with Mr Secord that the Minister had not spoken to us and so on �ursday 13th September, the Hon. Walt Secord asked the Minister of Police who exactly he spoke to at the University.

Extract from Hansard of 13th September:�e Hon. WALT SECORD: After Tuesday's question time I checked with the president of Newcastle University's student representative association, Ms Heather Richards, who said her organisation had not met with the Minister to discuss racist attacks on international students. With whom did the Minister meet at the University of Newcastle to discuss racist attacks on international students?�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: I will consult my diary and look to see—�e Hon. PENNY SHARPE: You shouldn't have to.�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: Settle down. Just because I have not met some sycophant of Walt's does not mean—

�e point is that whilst in opposition I met the faculty in relation to this problem. I indicated to the House that I have met with representatives from the university and will continue to meet with representatives of the Newcastle community, both law enforcement and otherwise, in relation to a whole host of issues.

I have some points to make about this:

1. I am not a sycophant of the Hon. Walt Secord, having spoken to him only twice at this point.

2. The Minister has made this allegation based on no evidence. The Minister does not know me, or have any knowledge about the relationship between myself and the Hon. Walt Secord apart from Mr Secord’s statement that he had spoken to me about whether or not the Minister had spoken to me.

3. One of the key problems we see is that international students are loathe to report incidents because they do not trust the authorities. The Minister for Police has an implicit responsibility towards the community and is expected to maintain a high standard of behaviour, essentially be an example to the broader community.

4. Insulting a member of the public in Parliament is not behaviour concomitant with the ambassador of law and order. His comments show disrespect towards the students who had the courage to come forward and report an incident. International students are already wary of the authorities and this type of behaviour and comment does nothing to disparage such a viewpoint.

5. The Minister originally explained that he had met with representatives from the University but then stated that he had met with the “faculty”.

6. The Minister indicated that he had met with the “faculty” whilst in opposition – i.e. over a year and half ago, not recently.

The Legislative Council has approved my citizen’s right of reply, which will now form a part of the Hansard record. The Minister for Police also publically apologised in Parliament.

Other responsesFrom Human Rights Commission, MP Tim Owen, Newcastle Lord Mayor candidate Nuatali Nelmes, National Union of Students (NUS) and Council of International Students Australia (CISA)

On 11th September, the Human Rights Commission Race Discrimination Commissioner, Dr Helen Szoke responded to our report.

�e Human Rights Commission has worked with international student representatives over the past couple of years on this issue and Dr. Szoke informed us that they would be launching, “Principles to Promote and Protect the Human Rights of International Students” at the AIEC conference in Melbourne. (�at is a one of the largest conferences during the year relating to the industry around international students). �ey are keen to know if our recommendations are followed up on and whether this improves the situation for international students.

We have connected with the NSW Deputy Police Commissioner to work on establishing a reference group.

On 26th September we met with MP Tim Owen, State Member for Newcastle, to discuss our report and ways forward.

We outlined what had happened and he informed us that upon receipt of our report he sent a hardcopy version straight to the Deputy Premier informing him that this is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with.

He asked us to forward information to him regarding the comments made by the NSW Police Minister, where he called me a sycophant in the Legislative Council.

Tim Owen made it clear that violence and verbal abuse are not acceptable and are not to be

tolerated. We have agreed to forward him information about some of the positive projects those arose from the 2009 reference group established in Melbourne as a result of the attacks against Indian students.

He indicated he shared our view that the University’s, “it’s only 5%” response showed a demonstrable lack of leadership.

Overall, the meeting was productive and we hope that we can move forwards to establishing long-term solutions to the issue.

�e NUS President, Education O�cer and Environment O�cer visited Newcastle on Wednesday 29th August. �ey issued a media release supporting our initiative and were interviewed on the SBS interview.

“�is is a bit of a widespread problem across the entirety of Australia. We need to change attitudes in society so that international students aren’t just being seen as cash cows.”

CISA issued a media releasing supporting our initiative and are considering introducing a national version of our tool.

Nuatali Nelmes o�ered us support early on and along with the other Lord Mayor candidates who attend NUSA’s Lord Mayor Candidate panel, she agreed that she would be interested in being part of any reference group established.

We have also met with Newcastle Ethnic Community Council who noted that this is a big problem in Newcastle.

ConclusionWhilst NUSA’s year long study is unique in that it was a multilingual study run by students in Newcastle, a couple of studies were undertaken in Melbourne in 2010 which gave similar results.

On 17th February 2010, the Age reported that a study of international students in Victoria found that a large majority had experienced threats to their safety. More than 75% reported incidents ranging from verbal abuse to violence. In half of those, students reported a racial, religious or cultural element.

In 2010 the City of Melbourne they surveyed 786 international students in Melbourne. Of those in the survey who indicated they had experienced an incident, 73% indicated they had not reported it.

In 2010 the Human Rights Commission held a workshop on racism, exclusion and poverty: key factors reducing international student safety. In their overview they allude to a study conducted on 200 international students where 50% indicated they had experienced discrimination.

  “Evidence also suggests that some students, particularly those from non-European and non-English speaking backgrounds, experience multiple forms of discrimination in the broader community, including racial hatred and violence.”

All of the above are similar to the results found in NUSA’s study, especially in relation to levels of reporting incidents to the authorities. �is is an area in which all need to work so that students are aware that they can get help.

We still have not received a response from the University. �e Vice-Chancellor has previously threatened us by stating that they would consider any matter we take to the Herald as low priority. �eir media reaction would suggest our report was anything but a low priority – but was probably a major inconvenience.

I do not apologise for NUSA running this module and publishing the results. We will continue to work towards establishing a reference group, look for solutions and encourage international students to report incidents.

Education exports may have been worth over $13.1 billion in 2011, but international students are not lumps of coal.

I do not believe that if Australian students from the University of Newcastle were being assaulted overseas the response seen would be acceptable.

“One physical assault or incident of verbal abuse is not acceptable. �ere is no ‘only 5%’.”

Finally, I reiterate my respect to those international students who have come forward and talked about what has happened to them.

If you have been a victim of an incident then please do not remain silent. You can get assistance from NUSA, the police, the University International Student O�cer and a number of helplines. Even if you do not want to o�cially report it to the police, it is important to talk to someone. It is perfectly normal to experience a delayed reaction to an incident.

Heather Richards2012 NUSA President

9

Newcastle Herald 16/11/12

Page 12: Opus November

As of the 29th August, only the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Prof. Kevin McConkey had responded. By the end of the week we got the response through the media of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Caroline McMillen.

Vice-Chancellor Prof. Caroline McMillen

In the SBS interview on �ursday 30th August she said:

“We work on all issues raised, great and small, to really ensure that our students have the safest environment.”

�e Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program, on ABC Radio Australia. �e following are some extracts from her speech with comments.

“Well �rstly I should say that was a small survey, it was run by the student group er on campus…”

“�e issues that erm across Australia across the whole international uh world that you know students, uh young people out at night, young people uh in our cities can sometimes engage with groups who uh you know are looking to stir up a bit of trouble.”

I submit that this is shifting the blame on the victims. Also I dispute the truth in this statement. Firstly, many international students who do not live in the city do not go there at night because they do not have the money, are afraid, do not have a transport concession or have other recreational habits.

“It was less than 5% of our student body uh who reported uh those issues. We don’t diminish their seriousness but we do know ourselves uh in our larger surveys and sort of deeper surveys as it were uh rather more have focus, and I’m I’m particularly concerned about, as it were, making certain the environment we have is absolutely safe and secure.”

“It was less than 5%, but we don’t diminish the seriousness.” Think you just did. Besides, did this interview not start with you stating that it was a survey on a small group… NUSA has openly stated that many international students were not aware of the module and some have since come to us reporting incidents. Also, what’s a “deeper survey” when it’s at home?

“We engage consistently, if there are any issues we don’t know about we are always keen to hear them.”

Unless we run a yearlong module and make the results public.

“We have around 3000 international students erm here in Newcastle uh the report talked about 163 responses. We don’t know how many students that refers to, whether some students were reporting more than one time where perhaps somebody had spoken to them on a train or in a shopping centre uh so it’s 163 responses, around more than half of our students are of course from China and Malaysia and Korea, great cultures, great countries. And around a proportion of the responses, were, I think slightly less than that in uh that report.”

So now students are victims in shopping centres and trains? Presumably these are shopping centres and trains in the city at night. Not quite sure where the statements about proportionality are going, but as no data has been released publically it is a little difficult to test it. However, NUSA is almost 100% certain that the proportion of Asian students amongst the international student population was less than 86% across the past year. I mean weren’t at least a total of 500 European and American students present in international student orientations mid-year 2011 and the start of 2012?

“If I could just say that you know over 80% of our international students say in these independent surveys and this is large surveys

that our university experience, their university experience has lived up to their expectations.”

This sounds suspiciously like the International Student Barometer, a national survey undertaken on international students studying in Australia. It had a 17% response rate with 86% indicating they were satisfied with their educational experience. International student representatives have long maintained that being, “overall satisfied with your educational experience” does not preclude a traumatic event during this time. The question is very broad!

�e Vice-Chancellor’s salary has previously been over $600,000 a year. I submit that this response is not worthy of such a salary and shows absolutely no leadership. �e University has been defensive and reactive when they had not even been attacked. Other sta� members within the University have been much more supportive of NUSA’s initiative

In NSW Parliament NUSA President called a “sycophant” by the Minister for Police

�e report was mentioned in the Legislative Council of NSW State Parliament on Tuesday 11th September. �e Hon. Walt Secord asked Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice-President of the Executive Council, the Hon. Michael Gallacher a question without notice about NUSA’s report. �e Minister for Police’s response seemed a little confused [he commended the University for conducting the survey] and he stated that he had spoken, “with representatives from the university in the past to discuss this very issue.” I con�rmed with Mr Secord that the Minister had not spoken to us and so on �ursday 13th September, the Hon. Walt Secord asked the Minister of Police who exactly he spoke to at the University.

Extract from Hansard of 13th September:�e Hon. WALT SECORD: After Tuesday's question time I checked with the president of Newcastle University's student representative association, Ms Heather Richards, who said her organisation had not met with the Minister to discuss racist attacks on international students. With whom did the Minister meet at the University of Newcastle to discuss racist attacks on international students?�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: I will consult my diary and look to see—�e Hon. PENNY SHARPE: You shouldn't have to.�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: Settle down. Just because I have not met some sycophant of Walt's does not mean—

�e point is that whilst in opposition I met the faculty in relation to this problem. I indicated to the House that I have met with representatives from the university and will continue to meet with representatives of the Newcastle community, both law enforcement and otherwise, in relation to a whole host of issues.

I have some points to make about this:

1. I am not a sycophant of the Hon. Walt Secord, having spoken to him only twice at this point.

2. The Minister has made this allegation based on no evidence. The Minister does not know me, or have any knowledge about the relationship between myself and the Hon. Walt Secord apart from Mr Secord’s statement that he had spoken to me about whether or not the Minister had spoken to me.

3. One of the key problems we see is that international students are loathe to report incidents because they do not trust the authorities. The Minister for Police has an implicit responsibility towards the community and is expected to maintain a high standard of behaviour, essentially be an example to the broader community.

4. Insulting a member of the public in Parliament is not behaviour concomitant with the ambassador of law and order. His comments show disrespect towards the students who had the courage to come forward and report an incident. International students are already wary of the authorities and this type of behaviour and comment does nothing to disparage such a viewpoint.

5. The Minister originally explained that he had met with representatives from the University but then stated that he had met with the “faculty”.

6. The Minister indicated that he had met with the “faculty” whilst in opposition – i.e. over a year and half ago, not recently.

The Legislative Council has approved my citizen’s right of reply, which will now form a part of the Hansard record. The Minister for Police also publically apologised in Parliament.

Other responsesFrom Human Rights Commission, MP Tim Owen, Newcastle Lord Mayor candidate Nuatali Nelmes, National Union of Students (NUS) and Council of International Students Australia (CISA)

On 11th September, the Human Rights Commission Race Discrimination Commissioner, Dr Helen Szoke responded to our report.

�e Human Rights Commission has worked with international student representatives over the past couple of years on this issue and Dr. Szoke informed us that they would be launching, “Principles to Promote and Protect the Human Rights of International Students” at the AIEC conference in Melbourne. (�at is a one of the largest conferences during the year relating to the industry around international students). �ey are keen to know if our recommendations are followed up on and whether this improves the situation for international students.

We have connected with the NSW Deputy Police Commissioner to work on establishing a reference group.

On 26th September we met with MP Tim Owen, State Member for Newcastle, to discuss our report and ways forward.

We outlined what had happened and he informed us that upon receipt of our report he sent a hardcopy version straight to the Deputy Premier informing him that this is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with.

He asked us to forward information to him regarding the comments made by the NSW Police Minister, where he called me a sycophant in the Legislative Council.

Tim Owen made it clear that violence and verbal abuse are not acceptable and are not to be

tolerated. We have agreed to forward him information about some of the positive projects those arose from the 2009 reference group established in Melbourne as a result of the attacks against Indian students.

He indicated he shared our view that the University’s, “it’s only 5%” response showed a demonstrable lack of leadership.

Overall, the meeting was productive and we hope that we can move forwards to establishing long-term solutions to the issue.

�e NUS President, Education O�cer and Environment O�cer visited Newcastle on Wednesday 29th August. �ey issued a media release supporting our initiative and were interviewed on the SBS interview.

“�is is a bit of a widespread problem across the entirety of Australia. We need to change attitudes in society so that international students aren’t just being seen as cash cows.”

CISA issued a media releasing supporting our initiative and are considering introducing a national version of our tool.

Nuatali Nelmes o�ered us support early on and along with the other Lord Mayor candidates who attend NUSA’s Lord Mayor Candidate panel, she agreed that she would be interested in being part of any reference group established.

We have also met with Newcastle Ethnic Community Council who noted that this is a big problem in Newcastle.

ConclusionWhilst NUSA’s year long study is unique in that it was a multilingual study run by students in Newcastle, a couple of studies were undertaken in Melbourne in 2010 which gave similar results.

On 17th February 2010, the Age reported that a study of international students in Victoria found that a large majority had experienced threats to their safety. More than 75% reported incidents ranging from verbal abuse to violence. In half of those, students reported a racial, religious or cultural element.

In 2010 the City of Melbourne they surveyed 786 international students in Melbourne. Of those in the survey who indicated they had experienced an incident, 73% indicated they had not reported it.

In 2010 the Human Rights Commission held a workshop on racism, exclusion and poverty: key factors reducing international student safety. In their overview they allude to a study conducted on 200 international students where 50% indicated they had experienced discrimination.

  “Evidence also suggests that some students, particularly those from non-European and non-English speaking backgrounds, experience multiple forms of discrimination in the broader community, including racial hatred and violence.”

All of the above are similar to the results found in NUSA’s study, especially in relation to levels of reporting incidents to the authorities. �is is an area in which all need to work so that students are aware that they can get help.

We still have not received a response from the University. �e Vice-Chancellor has previously threatened us by stating that they would consider any matter we take to the Herald as low priority. �eir media reaction would suggest our report was anything but a low priority – but was probably a major inconvenience.

I do not apologise for NUSA running this module and publishing the results. We will continue to work towards establishing a reference group, look for solutions and encourage international students to report incidents.

Education exports may have been worth over $13.1 billion in 2011, but international students are not lumps of coal.

I do not believe that if Australian students from the University of Newcastle were being assaulted overseas the response seen would be acceptable.

“One physical assault or incident of verbal abuse is not acceptable. �ere is no ‘only 5%’.”

Finally, I reiterate my respect to those international students who have come forward and talked about what has happened to them.

If you have been a victim of an incident then please do not remain silent. You can get assistance from NUSA, the police, the University International Student O�cer and a number of helplines. Even if you do not want to o�cially report it to the police, it is important to talk to someone. It is perfectly normal to experience a delayed reaction to an incident.

Heather Richards2012 NUSA President

10

As of the 29th August, only the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Prof. Kevin McConkey had responded. By the end of the week we got the response through the media of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Caroline McMillen.

Vice-Chancellor Prof. Caroline McMillen

In the SBS interview on �ursday 30th August she said:

“We work on all issues raised, great and small, to really ensure that our students have the safest environment.”

�e Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program, on ABC Radio Australia. �e following are some extracts from her speech with comments.

“Well �rstly I should say that was a small survey, it was run by the student group er on campus…”

“�e issues that erm across Australia across the whole international uh world that you know students, uh young people out at night, young people uh in our cities can sometimes engage with groups who uh you know are looking to stir up a bit of trouble.”

I submit that this is shifting the blame on the victims. Also I dispute the truth in this statement. Firstly, many international students who do not live in the city do not go there at night because they do not have the money, are afraid, do not have a transport concession or have other recreational habits.

“It was less than 5% of our student body uh who reported uh those issues. We don’t diminish their seriousness but we do know ourselves uh in our larger surveys and sort of deeper surveys as it were uh rather more have focus, and I’m I’m particularly concerned about, as it were, making certain the environment we have is absolutely safe and secure.”

“It was less than 5%, but we don’t diminish the seriousness.” Think you just did. Besides, did this interview not start with you stating that it was a survey on a small group… NUSA has openly stated that many international students were not aware of the module and some have since come to us reporting incidents. Also, what’s a “deeper survey” when it’s at home?

“We engage consistently, if there are any issues we don’t know about we are always keen to hear them.”

Unless we run a yearlong module and make the results public.

“We have around 3000 international students erm here in Newcastle uh the report talked about 163 responses. We don’t know how many students that refers to, whether some students were reporting more than one time where perhaps somebody had spoken to them on a train or in a shopping centre uh so it’s 163 responses, around more than half of our students are of course from China and Malaysia and Korea, great cultures, great countries. And around a proportion of the responses, were, I think slightly less than that in uh that report.”

So now students are victims in shopping centres and trains? Presumably these are shopping centres and trains in the city at night. Not quite sure where the statements about proportionality are going, but as no data has been released publically it is a little difficult to test it. However, NUSA is almost 100% certain that the proportion of Asian students amongst the international student population was less than 86% across the past year. I mean weren’t at least a total of 500 European and American students present in international student orientations mid-year 2011 and the start of 2012?

“If I could just say that you know over 80% of our international students say in these independent surveys and this is large surveys

that our university experience, their university experience has lived up to their expectations.”

This sounds suspiciously like the International Student Barometer, a national survey undertaken on international students studying in Australia. It had a 17% response rate with 86% indicating they were satisfied with their educational experience. International student representatives have long maintained that being, “overall satisfied with your educational experience” does not preclude a traumatic event during this time. The question is very broad!

�e Vice-Chancellor’s salary has previously been over $600,000 a year. I submit that this response is not worthy of such a salary and shows absolutely no leadership. �e University has been defensive and reactive when they had not even been attacked. Other sta� members within the University have been much more supportive of NUSA’s initiative

In NSW Parliament NUSA President called a “sycophant” by the Minister for Police

�e report was mentioned in the Legislative Council of NSW State Parliament on Tuesday 11th September. �e Hon. Walt Secord asked Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice-President of the Executive Council, the Hon. Michael Gallacher a question without notice about NUSA’s report. �e Minister for Police’s response seemed a little confused [he commended the University for conducting the survey] and he stated that he had spoken, “with representatives from the university in the past to discuss this very issue.” I con�rmed with Mr Secord that the Minister had not spoken to us and so on �ursday 13th September, the Hon. Walt Secord asked the Minister of Police who exactly he spoke to at the University.

Extract from Hansard of 13th September:�e Hon. WALT SECORD: After Tuesday's question time I checked with the president of Newcastle University's student representative association, Ms Heather Richards, who said her organisation had not met with the Minister to discuss racist attacks on international students. With whom did the Minister meet at the University of Newcastle to discuss racist attacks on international students?�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: I will consult my diary and look to see—�e Hon. PENNY SHARPE: You shouldn't have to.�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: Settle down. Just because I have not met some sycophant of Walt's does not mean—

�e point is that whilst in opposition I met the faculty in relation to this problem. I indicated to the House that I have met with representatives from the university and will continue to meet with representatives of the Newcastle community, both law enforcement and otherwise, in relation to a whole host of issues.

I have some points to make about this:

1. I am not a sycophant of the Hon. Walt Secord, having spoken to him only twice at this point.

2. The Minister has made this allegation based on no evidence. The Minister does not know me, or have any knowledge about the relationship between myself and the Hon. Walt Secord apart from Mr Secord’s statement that he had spoken to me about whether or not the Minister had spoken to me.

3. One of the key problems we see is that international students are loathe to report incidents because they do not trust the authorities. The Minister for Police has an implicit responsibility towards the community and is expected to maintain a high standard of behaviour, essentially be an example to the broader community.

4. Insulting a member of the public in Parliament is not behaviour concomitant with the ambassador of law and order. His comments show disrespect towards the students who had the courage to come forward and report an incident. International students are already wary of the authorities and this type of behaviour and comment does nothing to disparage such a viewpoint.

5. The Minister originally explained that he had met with representatives from the University but then stated that he had met with the “faculty”.

6. The Minister indicated that he had met with the “faculty” whilst in opposition – i.e. over a year and half ago, not recently.

The Legislative Council has approved my citizen’s right of reply, which will now form a part of the Hansard record. The Minister for Police also publically apologised in Parliament.

Other responsesFrom Human Rights Commission, MP Tim Owen, Newcastle Lord Mayor candidate Nuatali Nelmes, National Union of Students (NUS) and Council of International Students Australia (CISA)

On 11th September, the Human Rights Commission Race Discrimination Commissioner, Dr Helen Szoke responded to our report.

�e Human Rights Commission has worked with international student representatives over the past couple of years on this issue and Dr. Szoke informed us that they would be launching, “Principles to Promote and Protect the Human Rights of International Students” at the AIEC conference in Melbourne. (�at is a one of the largest conferences during the year relating to the industry around international students). �ey are keen to know if our recommendations are followed up on and whether this improves the situation for international students.

We have connected with the NSW Deputy Police Commissioner to work on establishing a reference group.

On 26th September we met with MP Tim Owen, State Member for Newcastle, to discuss our report and ways forward.

We outlined what had happened and he informed us that upon receipt of our report he sent a hardcopy version straight to the Deputy Premier informing him that this is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with.

He asked us to forward information to him regarding the comments made by the NSW Police Minister, where he called me a sycophant in the Legislative Council.

Tim Owen made it clear that violence and verbal abuse are not acceptable and are not to be

tolerated. We have agreed to forward him information about some of the positive projects those arose from the 2009 reference group established in Melbourne as a result of the attacks against Indian students.

He indicated he shared our view that the University’s, “it’s only 5%” response showed a demonstrable lack of leadership.

Overall, the meeting was productive and we hope that we can move forwards to establishing long-term solutions to the issue.

�e NUS President, Education O�cer and Environment O�cer visited Newcastle on Wednesday 29th August. �ey issued a media release supporting our initiative and were interviewed on the SBS interview.

“�is is a bit of a widespread problem across the entirety of Australia. We need to change attitudes in society so that international students aren’t just being seen as cash cows.”

CISA issued a media releasing supporting our initiative and are considering introducing a national version of our tool.

Nuatali Nelmes o�ered us support early on and along with the other Lord Mayor candidates who attend NUSA’s Lord Mayor Candidate panel, she agreed that she would be interested in being part of any reference group established.

We have also met with Newcastle Ethnic Community Council who noted that this is a big problem in Newcastle.

ConclusionWhilst NUSA’s year long study is unique in that it was a multilingual study run by students in Newcastle, a couple of studies were undertaken in Melbourne in 2010 which gave similar results.

On 17th February 2010, the Age reported that a study of international students in Victoria found that a large majority had experienced threats to their safety. More than 75% reported incidents ranging from verbal abuse to violence. In half of those, students reported a racial, religious or cultural element.

In 2010 the City of Melbourne they surveyed 786 international students in Melbourne. Of those in the survey who indicated they had experienced an incident, 73% indicated they had not reported it.

In 2010 the Human Rights Commission held a workshop on racism, exclusion and poverty: key factors reducing international student safety. In their overview they allude to a study conducted on 200 international students where 50% indicated they had experienced discrimination.

  “Evidence also suggests that some students, particularly those from non-European and non-English speaking backgrounds, experience multiple forms of discrimination in the broader community, including racial hatred and violence.”

All of the above are similar to the results found in NUSA’s study, especially in relation to levels of reporting incidents to the authorities. �is is an area in which all need to work so that students are aware that they can get help.

We still have not received a response from the University. �e Vice-Chancellor has previously threatened us by stating that they would consider any matter we take to the Herald as low priority. �eir media reaction would suggest our report was anything but a low priority – but was probably a major inconvenience.

I do not apologise for NUSA running this module and publishing the results. We will continue to work towards establishing a reference group, look for solutions and encourage international students to report incidents.

Education exports may have been worth over $13.1 billion in 2011, but international students are not lumps of coal.

I do not believe that if Australian students from the University of Newcastle were being assaulted overseas the response seen would be acceptable.

“One physical assault or incident of verbal abuse is not acceptable. �ere is no ‘only 5%’.”

Finally, I reiterate my respect to those international students who have come forward and talked about what has happened to them.

If you have been a victim of an incident then please do not remain silent. You can get assistance from NUSA, the police, the University International Student O�cer and a number of helplines. Even if you do not want to o�cially report it to the police, it is important to talk to someone. It is perfectly normal to experience a delayed reaction to an incident.

Heather Richards2012 NUSA President

11

Page 13: Opus November

As of the 29th August, only the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Prof. Kevin McConkey had responded. By the end of the week we got the response through the media of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Caroline McMillen.

Vice-Chancellor Prof. Caroline McMillen

In the SBS interview on �ursday 30th August she said:

“We work on all issues raised, great and small, to really ensure that our students have the safest environment.”

�e Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program, on ABC Radio Australia. �e following are some extracts from her speech with comments.

“Well �rstly I should say that was a small survey, it was run by the student group er on campus…”

“�e issues that erm across Australia across the whole international uh world that you know students, uh young people out at night, young people uh in our cities can sometimes engage with groups who uh you know are looking to stir up a bit of trouble.”

I submit that this is shifting the blame on the victims. Also I dispute the truth in this statement. Firstly, many international students who do not live in the city do not go there at night because they do not have the money, are afraid, do not have a transport concession or have other recreational habits.

“It was less than 5% of our student body uh who reported uh those issues. We don’t diminish their seriousness but we do know ourselves uh in our larger surveys and sort of deeper surveys as it were uh rather more have focus, and I’m I’m particularly concerned about, as it were, making certain the environment we have is absolutely safe and secure.”

“It was less than 5%, but we don’t diminish the seriousness.” Think you just did. Besides, did this interview not start with you stating that it was a survey on a small group… NUSA has openly stated that many international students were not aware of the module and some have since come to us reporting incidents. Also, what’s a “deeper survey” when it’s at home?

“We engage consistently, if there are any issues we don’t know about we are always keen to hear them.”

Unless we run a yearlong module and make the results public.

“We have around 3000 international students erm here in Newcastle uh the report talked about 163 responses. We don’t know how many students that refers to, whether some students were reporting more than one time where perhaps somebody had spoken to them on a train or in a shopping centre uh so it’s 163 responses, around more than half of our students are of course from China and Malaysia and Korea, great cultures, great countries. And around a proportion of the responses, were, I think slightly less than that in uh that report.”

So now students are victims in shopping centres and trains? Presumably these are shopping centres and trains in the city at night. Not quite sure where the statements about proportionality are going, but as no data has been released publically it is a little difficult to test it. However, NUSA is almost 100% certain that the proportion of Asian students amongst the international student population was less than 86% across the past year. I mean weren’t at least a total of 500 European and American students present in international student orientations mid-year 2011 and the start of 2012?

“If I could just say that you know over 80% of our international students say in these independent surveys and this is large surveys

that our university experience, their university experience has lived up to their expectations.”

This sounds suspiciously like the International Student Barometer, a national survey undertaken on international students studying in Australia. It had a 17% response rate with 86% indicating they were satisfied with their educational experience. International student representatives have long maintained that being, “overall satisfied with your educational experience” does not preclude a traumatic event during this time. The question is very broad!

�e Vice-Chancellor’s salary has previously been over $600,000 a year. I submit that this response is not worthy of such a salary and shows absolutely no leadership. �e University has been defensive and reactive when they had not even been attacked. Other sta� members within the University have been much more supportive of NUSA’s initiative

In NSW Parliament NUSA President called a “sycophant” by the Minister for Police

�e report was mentioned in the Legislative Council of NSW State Parliament on Tuesday 11th September. �e Hon. Walt Secord asked Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice-President of the Executive Council, the Hon. Michael Gallacher a question without notice about NUSA’s report. �e Minister for Police’s response seemed a little confused [he commended the University for conducting the survey] and he stated that he had spoken, “with representatives from the university in the past to discuss this very issue.” I con�rmed with Mr Secord that the Minister had not spoken to us and so on �ursday 13th September, the Hon. Walt Secord asked the Minister of Police who exactly he spoke to at the University.

Extract from Hansard of 13th September:�e Hon. WALT SECORD: After Tuesday's question time I checked with the president of Newcastle University's student representative association, Ms Heather Richards, who said her organisation had not met with the Minister to discuss racist attacks on international students. With whom did the Minister meet at the University of Newcastle to discuss racist attacks on international students?�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: I will consult my diary and look to see—�e Hon. PENNY SHARPE: You shouldn't have to.�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: Settle down. Just because I have not met some sycophant of Walt's does not mean—

�e point is that whilst in opposition I met the faculty in relation to this problem. I indicated to the House that I have met with representatives from the university and will continue to meet with representatives of the Newcastle community, both law enforcement and otherwise, in relation to a whole host of issues.

I have some points to make about this:

1. I am not a sycophant of the Hon. Walt Secord, having spoken to him only twice at this point.

2. The Minister has made this allegation based on no evidence. The Minister does not know me, or have any knowledge about the relationship between myself and the Hon. Walt Secord apart from Mr Secord’s statement that he had spoken to me about whether or not the Minister had spoken to me.

3. One of the key problems we see is that international students are loathe to report incidents because they do not trust the authorities. The Minister for Police has an implicit responsibility towards the community and is expected to maintain a high standard of behaviour, essentially be an example to the broader community.

4. Insulting a member of the public in Parliament is not behaviour concomitant with the ambassador of law and order. His comments show disrespect towards the students who had the courage to come forward and report an incident. International students are already wary of the authorities and this type of behaviour and comment does nothing to disparage such a viewpoint.

5. The Minister originally explained that he had met with representatives from the University but then stated that he had met with the “faculty”.

6. The Minister indicated that he had met with the “faculty” whilst in opposition – i.e. over a year and half ago, not recently.

The Legislative Council has approved my citizen’s right of reply, which will now form a part of the Hansard record. The Minister for Police also publically apologised in Parliament.

Other responsesFrom Human Rights Commission, MP Tim Owen, Newcastle Lord Mayor candidate Nuatali Nelmes, National Union of Students (NUS) and Council of International Students Australia (CISA)

On 11th September, the Human Rights Commission Race Discrimination Commissioner, Dr Helen Szoke responded to our report.

�e Human Rights Commission has worked with international student representatives over the past couple of years on this issue and Dr. Szoke informed us that they would be launching, “Principles to Promote and Protect the Human Rights of International Students” at the AIEC conference in Melbourne. (�at is a one of the largest conferences during the year relating to the industry around international students). �ey are keen to know if our recommendations are followed up on and whether this improves the situation for international students.

We have connected with the NSW Deputy Police Commissioner to work on establishing a reference group.

On 26th September we met with MP Tim Owen, State Member for Newcastle, to discuss our report and ways forward.

We outlined what had happened and he informed us that upon receipt of our report he sent a hardcopy version straight to the Deputy Premier informing him that this is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with.

He asked us to forward information to him regarding the comments made by the NSW Police Minister, where he called me a sycophant in the Legislative Council.

Tim Owen made it clear that violence and verbal abuse are not acceptable and are not to be

tolerated. We have agreed to forward him information about some of the positive projects those arose from the 2009 reference group established in Melbourne as a result of the attacks against Indian students.

He indicated he shared our view that the University’s, “it’s only 5%” response showed a demonstrable lack of leadership.

Overall, the meeting was productive and we hope that we can move forwards to establishing long-term solutions to the issue.

�e NUS President, Education O�cer and Environment O�cer visited Newcastle on Wednesday 29th August. �ey issued a media release supporting our initiative and were interviewed on the SBS interview.

“�is is a bit of a widespread problem across the entirety of Australia. We need to change attitudes in society so that international students aren’t just being seen as cash cows.”

CISA issued a media releasing supporting our initiative and are considering introducing a national version of our tool.

Nuatali Nelmes o�ered us support early on and along with the other Lord Mayor candidates who attend NUSA’s Lord Mayor Candidate panel, she agreed that she would be interested in being part of any reference group established.

We have also met with Newcastle Ethnic Community Council who noted that this is a big problem in Newcastle.

ConclusionWhilst NUSA’s year long study is unique in that it was a multilingual study run by students in Newcastle, a couple of studies were undertaken in Melbourne in 2010 which gave similar results.

On 17th February 2010, the Age reported that a study of international students in Victoria found that a large majority had experienced threats to their safety. More than 75% reported incidents ranging from verbal abuse to violence. In half of those, students reported a racial, religious or cultural element.

In 2010 the City of Melbourne they surveyed 786 international students in Melbourne. Of those in the survey who indicated they had experienced an incident, 73% indicated they had not reported it.

In 2010 the Human Rights Commission held a workshop on racism, exclusion and poverty: key factors reducing international student safety. In their overview they allude to a study conducted on 200 international students where 50% indicated they had experienced discrimination.

  “Evidence also suggests that some students, particularly those from non-European and non-English speaking backgrounds, experience multiple forms of discrimination in the broader community, including racial hatred and violence.”

All of the above are similar to the results found in NUSA’s study, especially in relation to levels of reporting incidents to the authorities. �is is an area in which all need to work so that students are aware that they can get help.

We still have not received a response from the University. �e Vice-Chancellor has previously threatened us by stating that they would consider any matter we take to the Herald as low priority. �eir media reaction would suggest our report was anything but a low priority – but was probably a major inconvenience.

I do not apologise for NUSA running this module and publishing the results. We will continue to work towards establishing a reference group, look for solutions and encourage international students to report incidents.

Education exports may have been worth over $13.1 billion in 2011, but international students are not lumps of coal.

I do not believe that if Australian students from the University of Newcastle were being assaulted overseas the response seen would be acceptable.

“One physical assault or incident of verbal abuse is not acceptable. �ere is no ‘only 5%’.”

Finally, I reiterate my respect to those international students who have come forward and talked about what has happened to them.

If you have been a victim of an incident then please do not remain silent. You can get assistance from NUSA, the police, the University International Student O�cer and a number of helplines. Even if you do not want to o�cially report it to the police, it is important to talk to someone. It is perfectly normal to experience a delayed reaction to an incident.

Heather Richards2012 NUSA President

10

As of the 29th August, only the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Prof. Kevin McConkey had responded. By the end of the week we got the response through the media of the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Caroline McMillen.

Vice-Chancellor Prof. Caroline McMillen

In the SBS interview on �ursday 30th August she said:

“We work on all issues raised, great and small, to really ensure that our students have the safest environment.”

�e Vice-Chancellor was interviewed on the Asia Connect Program, on ABC Radio Australia. �e following are some extracts from her speech with comments.

“Well �rstly I should say that was a small survey, it was run by the student group er on campus…”

“�e issues that erm across Australia across the whole international uh world that you know students, uh young people out at night, young people uh in our cities can sometimes engage with groups who uh you know are looking to stir up a bit of trouble.”

I submit that this is shifting the blame on the victims. Also I dispute the truth in this statement. Firstly, many international students who do not live in the city do not go there at night because they do not have the money, are afraid, do not have a transport concession or have other recreational habits.

“It was less than 5% of our student body uh who reported uh those issues. We don’t diminish their seriousness but we do know ourselves uh in our larger surveys and sort of deeper surveys as it were uh rather more have focus, and I’m I’m particularly concerned about, as it were, making certain the environment we have is absolutely safe and secure.”

“It was less than 5%, but we don’t diminish the seriousness.” Think you just did. Besides, did this interview not start with you stating that it was a survey on a small group… NUSA has openly stated that many international students were not aware of the module and some have since come to us reporting incidents. Also, what’s a “deeper survey” when it’s at home?

“We engage consistently, if there are any issues we don’t know about we are always keen to hear them.”

Unless we run a yearlong module and make the results public.

“We have around 3000 international students erm here in Newcastle uh the report talked about 163 responses. We don’t know how many students that refers to, whether some students were reporting more than one time where perhaps somebody had spoken to them on a train or in a shopping centre uh so it’s 163 responses, around more than half of our students are of course from China and Malaysia and Korea, great cultures, great countries. And around a proportion of the responses, were, I think slightly less than that in uh that report.”

So now students are victims in shopping centres and trains? Presumably these are shopping centres and trains in the city at night. Not quite sure where the statements about proportionality are going, but as no data has been released publically it is a little difficult to test it. However, NUSA is almost 100% certain that the proportion of Asian students amongst the international student population was less than 86% across the past year. I mean weren’t at least a total of 500 European and American students present in international student orientations mid-year 2011 and the start of 2012?

“If I could just say that you know over 80% of our international students say in these independent surveys and this is large surveys

that our university experience, their university experience has lived up to their expectations.”

This sounds suspiciously like the International Student Barometer, a national survey undertaken on international students studying in Australia. It had a 17% response rate with 86% indicating they were satisfied with their educational experience. International student representatives have long maintained that being, “overall satisfied with your educational experience” does not preclude a traumatic event during this time. The question is very broad!

�e Vice-Chancellor’s salary has previously been over $600,000 a year. I submit that this response is not worthy of such a salary and shows absolutely no leadership. �e University has been defensive and reactive when they had not even been attacked. Other sta� members within the University have been much more supportive of NUSA’s initiative

In NSW Parliament NUSA President called a “sycophant” by the Minister for Police

�e report was mentioned in the Legislative Council of NSW State Parliament on Tuesday 11th September. �e Hon. Walt Secord asked Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice-President of the Executive Council, the Hon. Michael Gallacher a question without notice about NUSA’s report. �e Minister for Police’s response seemed a little confused [he commended the University for conducting the survey] and he stated that he had spoken, “with representatives from the university in the past to discuss this very issue.” I con�rmed with Mr Secord that the Minister had not spoken to us and so on �ursday 13th September, the Hon. Walt Secord asked the Minister of Police who exactly he spoke to at the University.

Extract from Hansard of 13th September:�e Hon. WALT SECORD: After Tuesday's question time I checked with the president of Newcastle University's student representative association, Ms Heather Richards, who said her organisation had not met with the Minister to discuss racist attacks on international students. With whom did the Minister meet at the University of Newcastle to discuss racist attacks on international students?�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: I will consult my diary and look to see—�e Hon. PENNY SHARPE: You shouldn't have to.�e Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: Settle down. Just because I have not met some sycophant of Walt's does not mean—

�e point is that whilst in opposition I met the faculty in relation to this problem. I indicated to the House that I have met with representatives from the university and will continue to meet with representatives of the Newcastle community, both law enforcement and otherwise, in relation to a whole host of issues.

I have some points to make about this:

1. I am not a sycophant of the Hon. Walt Secord, having spoken to him only twice at this point.

2. The Minister has made this allegation based on no evidence. The Minister does not know me, or have any knowledge about the relationship between myself and the Hon. Walt Secord apart from Mr Secord’s statement that he had spoken to me about whether or not the Minister had spoken to me.

3. One of the key problems we see is that international students are loathe to report incidents because they do not trust the authorities. The Minister for Police has an implicit responsibility towards the community and is expected to maintain a high standard of behaviour, essentially be an example to the broader community.

4. Insulting a member of the public in Parliament is not behaviour concomitant with the ambassador of law and order. His comments show disrespect towards the students who had the courage to come forward and report an incident. International students are already wary of the authorities and this type of behaviour and comment does nothing to disparage such a viewpoint.

5. The Minister originally explained that he had met with representatives from the University but then stated that he had met with the “faculty”.

6. The Minister indicated that he had met with the “faculty” whilst in opposition – i.e. over a year and half ago, not recently.

The Legislative Council has approved my citizen’s right of reply, which will now form a part of the Hansard record. The Minister for Police also publically apologised in Parliament.

Other responsesFrom Human Rights Commission, MP Tim Owen, Newcastle Lord Mayor candidate Nuatali Nelmes, National Union of Students (NUS) and Council of International Students Australia (CISA)

On 11th September, the Human Rights Commission Race Discrimination Commissioner, Dr Helen Szoke responded to our report.

�e Human Rights Commission has worked with international student representatives over the past couple of years on this issue and Dr. Szoke informed us that they would be launching, “Principles to Promote and Protect the Human Rights of International Students” at the AIEC conference in Melbourne. (�at is a one of the largest conferences during the year relating to the industry around international students). �ey are keen to know if our recommendations are followed up on and whether this improves the situation for international students.

We have connected with the NSW Deputy Police Commissioner to work on establishing a reference group.

On 26th September we met with MP Tim Owen, State Member for Newcastle, to discuss our report and ways forward.

We outlined what had happened and he informed us that upon receipt of our report he sent a hardcopy version straight to the Deputy Premier informing him that this is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with.

He asked us to forward information to him regarding the comments made by the NSW Police Minister, where he called me a sycophant in the Legislative Council.

Tim Owen made it clear that violence and verbal abuse are not acceptable and are not to be

tolerated. We have agreed to forward him information about some of the positive projects those arose from the 2009 reference group established in Melbourne as a result of the attacks against Indian students.

He indicated he shared our view that the University’s, “it’s only 5%” response showed a demonstrable lack of leadership.

Overall, the meeting was productive and we hope that we can move forwards to establishing long-term solutions to the issue.

�e NUS President, Education O�cer and Environment O�cer visited Newcastle on Wednesday 29th August. �ey issued a media release supporting our initiative and were interviewed on the SBS interview.

“�is is a bit of a widespread problem across the entirety of Australia. We need to change attitudes in society so that international students aren’t just being seen as cash cows.”

CISA issued a media releasing supporting our initiative and are considering introducing a national version of our tool.

Nuatali Nelmes o�ered us support early on and along with the other Lord Mayor candidates who attend NUSA’s Lord Mayor Candidate panel, she agreed that she would be interested in being part of any reference group established.

We have also met with Newcastle Ethnic Community Council who noted that this is a big problem in Newcastle.

ConclusionWhilst NUSA’s year long study is unique in that it was a multilingual study run by students in Newcastle, a couple of studies were undertaken in Melbourne in 2010 which gave similar results.

On 17th February 2010, the Age reported that a study of international students in Victoria found that a large majority had experienced threats to their safety. More than 75% reported incidents ranging from verbal abuse to violence. In half of those, students reported a racial, religious or cultural element.

In 2010 the City of Melbourne they surveyed 786 international students in Melbourne. Of those in the survey who indicated they had experienced an incident, 73% indicated they had not reported it.

In 2010 the Human Rights Commission held a workshop on racism, exclusion and poverty: key factors reducing international student safety. In their overview they allude to a study conducted on 200 international students where 50% indicated they had experienced discrimination.

  “Evidence also suggests that some students, particularly those from non-European and non-English speaking backgrounds, experience multiple forms of discrimination in the broader community, including racial hatred and violence.”

All of the above are similar to the results found in NUSA’s study, especially in relation to levels of reporting incidents to the authorities. �is is an area in which all need to work so that students are aware that they can get help.

We still have not received a response from the University. �e Vice-Chancellor has previously threatened us by stating that they would consider any matter we take to the Herald as low priority. �eir media reaction would suggest our report was anything but a low priority – but was probably a major inconvenience.

I do not apologise for NUSA running this module and publishing the results. We will continue to work towards establishing a reference group, look for solutions and encourage international students to report incidents.

Education exports may have been worth over $13.1 billion in 2011, but international students are not lumps of coal.

I do not believe that if Australian students from the University of Newcastle were being assaulted overseas the response seen would be acceptable.

“One physical assault or incident of verbal abuse is not acceptable. �ere is no ‘only 5%’.”

Finally, I reiterate my respect to those international students who have come forward and talked about what has happened to them.

If you have been a victim of an incident then please do not remain silent. You can get assistance from NUSA, the police, the University International Student O�cer and a number of helplines. Even if you do not want to o�cially report it to the police, it is important to talk to someone. It is perfectly normal to experience a delayed reaction to an incident.

Heather Richards2012 NUSA President

11

Page 14: Opus November

At the beginning of semester two, NUSA discovered that Education courses had su�ered cuts in face-to-face teaching. NUSA was alerted to these cuts by a concerned student who noticed a di�erence in their class scheduling and their actual class. �is student stated that,

"this is further evidence of the continuing decline in quality of teacher-training at this University."

Following on from this concern, NUSA submitted a letter to the Pro Vice Chancellor of the Faculty of Education and Arts Professor Germov. In this letter NUSA asked for the following:

• A list of the a�ected courses• Information regarding the process of student consultation used for these decisions• An explanation regarding the lack of information given to students about these changes• Suspension of all reductions until a proper process has been followed including student consultation and o�cial student noti�cations

After submitting our letter, we were contacted and a meeting was arranged between NUSA representatives and the Pro Vice Chancellor for the Faculty of Education and Arts, Prof. Germov.

NUSA launched a petition as a result of the meeting between Pro Vice Chancellor Professor Germov and the NUSA representatives. �e NUSA representatives who attended the meeting with Professor Germov reported that the PVC was �ustered and referred to NUSA’s submission as overreaction and alarmist.

NUSA was informed that there are 111 second year education courses at the University of Newcastle in semester two, 56 of which had

more than 26 hours of teaching time across the semester and of these, 30 had been impacted by reductions.

Prof. Germov also stated that these changes occurred to ensure “equity of delivery” and would improve the quality of the courses. At no point did Prof. Germov refer to any evidence that consultation of Education students occurred, only referring to the fact that these decisions had been made by Academics and Student’s opinions were not relevant on pedagogical matters.

�e NUSA representatives pointed out that of all students, it would be natural to assume that those studying education to become teachers, would take an interest in pedagogical matters. After all, it is to become a core element of their future careers. Prof. Germov seemed unpersuaded by such arguments. Further, NUSA submitted that the students should have been informed that the teaching-time in their classes had been cut. Prof. Germov eventually agreed that all students in a�ected courses would be informed.

Lastly, NUSA representatives requested that students be informed and consulted about any further measures to reduce face-to-face teaching. Prof. Germov restated his position that the Academics are “the experts” on these matters, not students.

NUSA believes that the University of Newcastle’s Code of Conduct, which is applicable to both sta� and students, has been violated in a number of ways. �is code of conduct is something we agree to abide by and uphold the values instilled within when we commence our studies. �ese �ve values are honesty, fairness, trust, accountability and respect. All students and sta� at the University are expected to conform to its principles. More information on the code of conduct, and the �ve values, can be found on the University website.(http://www.newcastle.edu.au/Resources/Divisions/Services/Human%20Resource%20Services/code-of-conduct.pdf)

On the 1st of August 2012 NUSA launched a Petition in regards to cuts in face-to-face teaching time in Education courses. A total of 342 people signed this petition against these cuts. At the same time Education students were invited to comment on these cuts and here is what they had to say:

“We are doing an education course - a course which equips you to teach face to face in a classroom. Tutorials where there has been more face to face teaching has equipped me better with resources, as well as skills.”

“Tutors will tell us several times in tutorials that the reason they are rushing is because they need to condense their lessons from, for example, 13 to 12. Tutors shouldn't have to explain and apologize for this.”

“�is is atrocious. It looks like a cover up and is not acceptable. Students should be consulted about changes of this magnitude.”

“It is APPALLING and completely unfair. It puts us at a disadvantage academically & we are unable to cover the course in enough detail.”

“We should be informed so that we can look at alternate methods of studying if necessary.”

“We pay for our education and if the University does not consult with us, how do they know that we want more/less face-to-face time. I could have just gone to the Open University, but I value having human interaction. It makes my courses make sense.”

“Outrageous! All education students should have been consulted and informed about this decision. To keep it hidden from the student population is deceitful on the university's part.”

“�e nature of our education courses are dependent on face-to-face contact. Every tutor is di�erent and imparts their own experiences and interpretations to us -something that is highly valued for us as future teachers. Discussing and re�ecting on our own schooling experiences and sharing these with our classmates is something that cannot be replaced with online. �ese discussions

need to be facilitated by the tutor in a class setting; otherwise we would never learn from each other's schooling and prac experiences.”

NUSA believes that the cuts to face-to-face teaching without consultation is a direct violation of the University’s code of conduct. Under the de�nition of respect the Code of Conduct states that respect, “means valuing others’ ideas and contributions.”

NUSA submits that Prof. Germov de�nitely does not value or respect the Education Student’s opinions on how their Education should be conducted.

NUSA was also alarmed to hear rumours that these cuts could just be the �rst of many cuts to come. Prof. Germov seems loathe to share information about these rumoured cuts with students, which NUSA believes violates the Code of Conduct in that Prof. Germov is not being transparent with students and has not been from the very beginning. Prof. Germov is not showing Fairness towards the education students whose classes have been halved without consultation and have not been informed of this decision. NUSA also believes this goes against what fairness means to individuals in the University Code of Conduct in that Professor Germov has failed to, “share or provide equitable access to relevant and appropriate information and knowledge.”

NUSA believes that this failure to make the information available to the student population infringes upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�resholds Standard) 2011. In the introduction to Section 6, it states that:

�e higher education provider documents its responsibilities to students and meets its responsibilities to students, including through the provision of information...

On a more serious level the comments made by Professor Germov infringe upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�reshold Standards) 2011. �e comment that student’s opinions on pedagogical matters were irrelevant, NUSA believes that it contradicts section 3.8 of the Higher Education Standards Framework which states that

...maintenance of academic standards, with appropriate mechanisms for external input, in accordance with international conventions for good academic practise...

Surely Education students should be consulted on pedagogical issues as it is something that they will have to deal with throughout the entirety of their degree and their career as teachers.

�e hidden cuts to face-to-face teaching have not only a�ected student’s learning time but have also impinged upon their ability to seek proper support concerning this issue, which NUSA believes is yet again another violation of Higher Education Standards Framework, this time section 6.6 which states:

Students are informed of and have appropriate access to:

Advocacy support, for example in relation to the higher education provider’s academic and procedural rules; and,

A range of personal support services adequate to meet the needs of the student body, such as counselling, health, welfare, accommodation and career services provided by appropriately quali�ed personnel.

NUSA believes that face-to-face-teaching is critical to a student’s understanding of a course. As students we pay for our education, be it full international student fees or deferred HECS payments, and this is one of the reasons that we demand the following:

• Cuts in face-to-face teaching in semester two education courses be reversed• Education students are consulted on any further changes which reduce face-to-face teaching• All pedagogical arguments for reducing face-to-face teaching are made publically available.

NUSA would also like to comment on the lack of reduction in International and HECS fee costs for the a�ected courses. Surely the reduction in hours means less expense, therefore lower International and HECS fees.

�e cuts in face-to-face teaching are part of a broader move towards online teaching. NUSA believes that many students’ stance on this issue is correctly summed up by one of the students that we canvassed who said:

“�e University can barely manage MyHub and Blackboard. �ey seriously think they can deliver courses online?? So many lecturers cannot even work Blackboard etc. How are they going to cope?”

Hayley HoworthNUSA Vice-President 2012NUSA Education O�cer 2013

12

At the beginning of semester two, NUSA discovered that Education courses had su�ered cuts in face-to-face teaching. NUSA was alerted to these cuts by a concerned student who noticed a di�erence in their class scheduling and their actual class. �is student stated that,

"this is further evidence of the continuing decline in quality of teacher-training at this University."

Following on from this concern, NUSA submitted a letter to the Pro Vice Chancellor of the Faculty of Education and Arts Professor Germov. In this letter NUSA asked for the following:

• A list of the a�ected courses• Information regarding the process of student consultation used for these decisions• An explanation regarding the lack of information given to students about these changes• Suspension of all reductions until a proper process has been followed including student consultation and o�cial student noti�cations

After submitting our letter, we were contacted and a meeting was arranged between NUSA representatives and the Pro Vice Chancellor for the Faculty of Education and Arts, Prof. Germov.

NUSA launched a petition as a result of the meeting between Pro Vice Chancellor Professor Germov and the NUSA representatives. �e NUSA representatives who attended the meeting with Professor Germov reported that the PVC was �ustered and referred to NUSA’s submission as overreaction and alarmist.

NUSA was informed that there are 111 second year education courses at the University of Newcastle in semester two, 56 of which had

more than 26 hours of teaching time across the semester and of these, 30 had been impacted by reductions.

Prof. Germov also stated that these changes occurred to ensure “equity of delivery” and would improve the quality of the courses. At no point did Prof. Germov refer to any evidence that consultation of Education students occurred, only referring to the fact that these decisions had been made by Academics and Student’s opinions were not relevant on pedagogical matters.

�e NUSA representatives pointed out that of all students, it would be natural to assume that those studying education to become teachers, would take an interest in pedagogical matters. After all, it is to become a core element of their future careers. Prof. Germov seemed unpersuaded by such arguments. Further, NUSA submitted that the students should have been informed that the teaching-time in their classes had been cut. Prof. Germov eventually agreed that all students in a�ected courses would be informed.

Lastly, NUSA representatives requested that students be informed and consulted about any further measures to reduce face-to-face teaching. Prof. Germov restated his position that the Academics are “the experts” on these matters, not students.

NUSA believes that the University of Newcastle’s Code of Conduct, which is applicable to both sta� and students, has been violated in a number of ways. �is code of conduct is something we agree to abide by and uphold the values instilled within when we commence our studies. �ese �ve values are honesty, fairness, trust, accountability and respect. All students and sta� at the University are expected to conform to its principles. More information on the code of conduct, and the �ve values, can be found on the University website.(http://www.newcastle.edu.au/Resources/Divisions/Services/Human%20Resource%20Services/code-of-conduct.pdf)

On the 1st of August 2012 NUSA launched a Petition in regards to cuts in face-to-face teaching time in Education courses. A total of 342 people signed this petition against these cuts. At the same time Education students were invited to comment on these cuts and here is what they had to say:

“We are doing an education course - a course which equips you to teach face to face in a classroom. Tutorials where there has been more face to face teaching has equipped me better with resources, as well as skills.”

“Tutors will tell us several times in tutorials that the reason they are rushing is because they need to condense their lessons from, for example, 13 to 12. Tutors shouldn't have to explain and apologize for this.”

“�is is atrocious. It looks like a cover up and is not acceptable. Students should be consulted about changes of this magnitude.”

“It is APPALLING and completely unfair. It puts us at a disadvantage academically & we are unable to cover the course in enough detail.”

“We should be informed so that we can look at alternate methods of studying if necessary.”

“We pay for our education and if the University does not consult with us, how do they know that we want more/less face-to-face time. I could have just gone to the Open University, but I value having human interaction. It makes my courses make sense.”

“Outrageous! All education students should have been consulted and informed about this decision. To keep it hidden from the student population is deceitful on the university's part.”

“�e nature of our education courses are dependent on face-to-face contact. Every tutor is di�erent and imparts their own experiences and interpretations to us -something that is highly valued for us as future teachers. Discussing and re�ecting on our own schooling experiences and sharing these with our classmates is something that cannot be replaced with online. �ese discussions

need to be facilitated by the tutor in a class setting; otherwise we would never learn from each other's schooling and prac experiences.”

NUSA believes that the cuts to face-to-face teaching without consultation is a direct violation of the University’s code of conduct. Under the de�nition of respect the Code of Conduct states that respect, “means valuing others’ ideas and contributions.”

NUSA submits that Prof. Germov de�nitely does not value or respect the Education Student’s opinions on how their Education should be conducted.

NUSA was also alarmed to hear rumours that these cuts could just be the �rst of many cuts to come. Prof. Germov seems loathe to share information about these rumoured cuts with students, which NUSA believes violates the Code of Conduct in that Prof. Germov is not being transparent with students and has not been from the very beginning. Prof. Germov is not showing Fairness towards the education students whose classes have been halved without consultation and have not been informed of this decision. NUSA also believes this goes against what fairness means to individuals in the University Code of Conduct in that Professor Germov has failed to, “share or provide equitable access to relevant and appropriate information and knowledge.”

NUSA believes that this failure to make the information available to the student population infringes upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�resholds Standard) 2011. In the introduction to Section 6, it states that:

�e higher education provider documents its responsibilities to students and meets its responsibilities to students, including through the provision of information...

On a more serious level the comments made by Professor Germov infringe upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�reshold Standards) 2011. �e comment that student’s opinions on pedagogical matters were irrelevant, NUSA believes that it contradicts section 3.8 of the Higher Education Standards Framework which states that

...maintenance of academic standards, with appropriate mechanisms for external input, in accordance with international conventions for good academic practise...

Surely Education students should be consulted on pedagogical issues as it is something that they will have to deal with throughout the entirety of their degree and their career as teachers.

�e hidden cuts to face-to-face teaching have not only a�ected student’s learning time but have also impinged upon their ability to seek proper support concerning this issue, which NUSA believes is yet again another violation of Higher Education Standards Framework, this time section 6.6 which states:

Students are informed of and have appropriate access to:

Advocacy support, for example in relation to the higher education provider’s academic and procedural rules; and,

A range of personal support services adequate to meet the needs of the student body, such as counselling, health, welfare, accommodation and career services provided by appropriately quali�ed personnel.

NUSA believes that face-to-face-teaching is critical to a student’s understanding of a course. As students we pay for our education, be it full international student fees or deferred HECS payments, and this is one of the reasons that we demand the following:

• Cuts in face-to-face teaching in semester two education courses be reversed• Education students are consulted on any further changes which reduce face-to-face teaching• All pedagogical arguments for reducing face-to-face teaching are made publically available.

NUSA would also like to comment on the lack of reduction in International and HECS fee costs for the a�ected courses. Surely the reduction in hours means less expense, therefore lower International and HECS fees.

�e cuts in face-to-face teaching are part of a broader move towards online teaching. NUSA believes that many students’ stance on this issue is correctly summed up by one of the students that we canvassed who said:

“�e University can barely manage MyHub and Blackboard. �ey seriously think they can deliver courses online?? So many lecturers cannot even work Blackboard etc. How are they going to cope?”

Hayley HoworthNUSA Vice-President 2012NUSA Education O�cer 2013

13

Page 15: Opus November

At the beginning of semester two, NUSA discovered that Education courses had su�ered cuts in face-to-face teaching. NUSA was alerted to these cuts by a concerned student who noticed a di�erence in their class scheduling and their actual class. �is student stated that,

"this is further evidence of the continuing decline in quality of teacher-training at this University."

Following on from this concern, NUSA submitted a letter to the Pro Vice Chancellor of the Faculty of Education and Arts Professor Germov. In this letter NUSA asked for the following:

• A list of the a�ected courses• Information regarding the process of student consultation used for these decisions• An explanation regarding the lack of information given to students about these changes• Suspension of all reductions until a proper process has been followed including student consultation and o�cial student noti�cations

After submitting our letter, we were contacted and a meeting was arranged between NUSA representatives and the Pro Vice Chancellor for the Faculty of Education and Arts, Prof. Germov.

NUSA launched a petition as a result of the meeting between Pro Vice Chancellor Professor Germov and the NUSA representatives. �e NUSA representatives who attended the meeting with Professor Germov reported that the PVC was �ustered and referred to NUSA’s submission as overreaction and alarmist.

NUSA was informed that there are 111 second year education courses at the University of Newcastle in semester two, 56 of which had

more than 26 hours of teaching time across the semester and of these, 30 had been impacted by reductions.

Prof. Germov also stated that these changes occurred to ensure “equity of delivery” and would improve the quality of the courses. At no point did Prof. Germov refer to any evidence that consultation of Education students occurred, only referring to the fact that these decisions had been made by Academics and Student’s opinions were not relevant on pedagogical matters.

�e NUSA representatives pointed out that of all students, it would be natural to assume that those studying education to become teachers, would take an interest in pedagogical matters. After all, it is to become a core element of their future careers. Prof. Germov seemed unpersuaded by such arguments. Further, NUSA submitted that the students should have been informed that the teaching-time in their classes had been cut. Prof. Germov eventually agreed that all students in a�ected courses would be informed.

Lastly, NUSA representatives requested that students be informed and consulted about any further measures to reduce face-to-face teaching. Prof. Germov restated his position that the Academics are “the experts” on these matters, not students.

NUSA believes that the University of Newcastle’s Code of Conduct, which is applicable to both sta� and students, has been violated in a number of ways. �is code of conduct is something we agree to abide by and uphold the values instilled within when we commence our studies. �ese �ve values are honesty, fairness, trust, accountability and respect. All students and sta� at the University are expected to conform to its principles. More information on the code of conduct, and the �ve values, can be found on the University website.(http://www.newcastle.edu.au/Resources/Divisions/Services/Human%20Resource%20Services/code-of-conduct.pdf)

On the 1st of August 2012 NUSA launched a Petition in regards to cuts in face-to-face teaching time in Education courses. A total of 342 people signed this petition against these cuts. At the same time Education students were invited to comment on these cuts and here is what they had to say:

“We are doing an education course - a course which equips you to teach face to face in a classroom. Tutorials where there has been more face to face teaching has equipped me better with resources, as well as skills.”

“Tutors will tell us several times in tutorials that the reason they are rushing is because they need to condense their lessons from, for example, 13 to 12. Tutors shouldn't have to explain and apologize for this.”

“�is is atrocious. It looks like a cover up and is not acceptable. Students should be consulted about changes of this magnitude.”

“It is APPALLING and completely unfair. It puts us at a disadvantage academically & we are unable to cover the course in enough detail.”

“We should be informed so that we can look at alternate methods of studying if necessary.”

“We pay for our education and if the University does not consult with us, how do they know that we want more/less face-to-face time. I could have just gone to the Open University, but I value having human interaction. It makes my courses make sense.”

“Outrageous! All education students should have been consulted and informed about this decision. To keep it hidden from the student population is deceitful on the university's part.”

“�e nature of our education courses are dependent on face-to-face contact. Every tutor is di�erent and imparts their own experiences and interpretations to us -something that is highly valued for us as future teachers. Discussing and re�ecting on our own schooling experiences and sharing these with our classmates is something that cannot be replaced with online. �ese discussions

need to be facilitated by the tutor in a class setting; otherwise we would never learn from each other's schooling and prac experiences.”

NUSA believes that the cuts to face-to-face teaching without consultation is a direct violation of the University’s code of conduct. Under the de�nition of respect the Code of Conduct states that respect, “means valuing others’ ideas and contributions.”

NUSA submits that Prof. Germov de�nitely does not value or respect the Education Student’s opinions on how their Education should be conducted.

NUSA was also alarmed to hear rumours that these cuts could just be the �rst of many cuts to come. Prof. Germov seems loathe to share information about these rumoured cuts with students, which NUSA believes violates the Code of Conduct in that Prof. Germov is not being transparent with students and has not been from the very beginning. Prof. Germov is not showing Fairness towards the education students whose classes have been halved without consultation and have not been informed of this decision. NUSA also believes this goes against what fairness means to individuals in the University Code of Conduct in that Professor Germov has failed to, “share or provide equitable access to relevant and appropriate information and knowledge.”

NUSA believes that this failure to make the information available to the student population infringes upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�resholds Standard) 2011. In the introduction to Section 6, it states that:

�e higher education provider documents its responsibilities to students and meets its responsibilities to students, including through the provision of information...

On a more serious level the comments made by Professor Germov infringe upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�reshold Standards) 2011. �e comment that student’s opinions on pedagogical matters were irrelevant, NUSA believes that it contradicts section 3.8 of the Higher Education Standards Framework which states that

...maintenance of academic standards, with appropriate mechanisms for external input, in accordance with international conventions for good academic practise...

Surely Education students should be consulted on pedagogical issues as it is something that they will have to deal with throughout the entirety of their degree and their career as teachers.

�e hidden cuts to face-to-face teaching have not only a�ected student’s learning time but have also impinged upon their ability to seek proper support concerning this issue, which NUSA believes is yet again another violation of Higher Education Standards Framework, this time section 6.6 which states:

Students are informed of and have appropriate access to:

Advocacy support, for example in relation to the higher education provider’s academic and procedural rules; and,

A range of personal support services adequate to meet the needs of the student body, such as counselling, health, welfare, accommodation and career services provided by appropriately quali�ed personnel.

NUSA believes that face-to-face-teaching is critical to a student’s understanding of a course. As students we pay for our education, be it full international student fees or deferred HECS payments, and this is one of the reasons that we demand the following:

• Cuts in face-to-face teaching in semester two education courses be reversed• Education students are consulted on any further changes which reduce face-to-face teaching• All pedagogical arguments for reducing face-to-face teaching are made publically available.

NUSA would also like to comment on the lack of reduction in International and HECS fee costs for the a�ected courses. Surely the reduction in hours means less expense, therefore lower International and HECS fees.

�e cuts in face-to-face teaching are part of a broader move towards online teaching. NUSA believes that many students’ stance on this issue is correctly summed up by one of the students that we canvassed who said:

“�e University can barely manage MyHub and Blackboard. �ey seriously think they can deliver courses online?? So many lecturers cannot even work Blackboard etc. How are they going to cope?”

Hayley HoworthNUSA Vice-President 2012NUSA Education O�cer 2013

12

At the beginning of semester two, NUSA discovered that Education courses had su�ered cuts in face-to-face teaching. NUSA was alerted to these cuts by a concerned student who noticed a di�erence in their class scheduling and their actual class. �is student stated that,

"this is further evidence of the continuing decline in quality of teacher-training at this University."

Following on from this concern, NUSA submitted a letter to the Pro Vice Chancellor of the Faculty of Education and Arts Professor Germov. In this letter NUSA asked for the following:

• A list of the a�ected courses• Information regarding the process of student consultation used for these decisions• An explanation regarding the lack of information given to students about these changes• Suspension of all reductions until a proper process has been followed including student consultation and o�cial student noti�cations

After submitting our letter, we were contacted and a meeting was arranged between NUSA representatives and the Pro Vice Chancellor for the Faculty of Education and Arts, Prof. Germov.

NUSA launched a petition as a result of the meeting between Pro Vice Chancellor Professor Germov and the NUSA representatives. �e NUSA representatives who attended the meeting with Professor Germov reported that the PVC was �ustered and referred to NUSA’s submission as overreaction and alarmist.

NUSA was informed that there are 111 second year education courses at the University of Newcastle in semester two, 56 of which had

more than 26 hours of teaching time across the semester and of these, 30 had been impacted by reductions.

Prof. Germov also stated that these changes occurred to ensure “equity of delivery” and would improve the quality of the courses. At no point did Prof. Germov refer to any evidence that consultation of Education students occurred, only referring to the fact that these decisions had been made by Academics and Student’s opinions were not relevant on pedagogical matters.

�e NUSA representatives pointed out that of all students, it would be natural to assume that those studying education to become teachers, would take an interest in pedagogical matters. After all, it is to become a core element of their future careers. Prof. Germov seemed unpersuaded by such arguments. Further, NUSA submitted that the students should have been informed that the teaching-time in their classes had been cut. Prof. Germov eventually agreed that all students in a�ected courses would be informed.

Lastly, NUSA representatives requested that students be informed and consulted about any further measures to reduce face-to-face teaching. Prof. Germov restated his position that the Academics are “the experts” on these matters, not students.

NUSA believes that the University of Newcastle’s Code of Conduct, which is applicable to both sta� and students, has been violated in a number of ways. �is code of conduct is something we agree to abide by and uphold the values instilled within when we commence our studies. �ese �ve values are honesty, fairness, trust, accountability and respect. All students and sta� at the University are expected to conform to its principles. More information on the code of conduct, and the �ve values, can be found on the University website.(http://www.newcastle.edu.au/Resources/Divisions/Services/Human%20Resource%20Services/code-of-conduct.pdf)

On the 1st of August 2012 NUSA launched a Petition in regards to cuts in face-to-face teaching time in Education courses. A total of 342 people signed this petition against these cuts. At the same time Education students were invited to comment on these cuts and here is what they had to say:

“We are doing an education course - a course which equips you to teach face to face in a classroom. Tutorials where there has been more face to face teaching has equipped me better with resources, as well as skills.”

“Tutors will tell us several times in tutorials that the reason they are rushing is because they need to condense their lessons from, for example, 13 to 12. Tutors shouldn't have to explain and apologize for this.”

“�is is atrocious. It looks like a cover up and is not acceptable. Students should be consulted about changes of this magnitude.”

“It is APPALLING and completely unfair. It puts us at a disadvantage academically & we are unable to cover the course in enough detail.”

“We should be informed so that we can look at alternate methods of studying if necessary.”

“We pay for our education and if the University does not consult with us, how do they know that we want more/less face-to-face time. I could have just gone to the Open University, but I value having human interaction. It makes my courses make sense.”

“Outrageous! All education students should have been consulted and informed about this decision. To keep it hidden from the student population is deceitful on the university's part.”

“�e nature of our education courses are dependent on face-to-face contact. Every tutor is di�erent and imparts their own experiences and interpretations to us -something that is highly valued for us as future teachers. Discussing and re�ecting on our own schooling experiences and sharing these with our classmates is something that cannot be replaced with online. �ese discussions

need to be facilitated by the tutor in a class setting; otherwise we would never learn from each other's schooling and prac experiences.”

NUSA believes that the cuts to face-to-face teaching without consultation is a direct violation of the University’s code of conduct. Under the de�nition of respect the Code of Conduct states that respect, “means valuing others’ ideas and contributions.”

NUSA submits that Prof. Germov de�nitely does not value or respect the Education Student’s opinions on how their Education should be conducted.

NUSA was also alarmed to hear rumours that these cuts could just be the �rst of many cuts to come. Prof. Germov seems loathe to share information about these rumoured cuts with students, which NUSA believes violates the Code of Conduct in that Prof. Germov is not being transparent with students and has not been from the very beginning. Prof. Germov is not showing Fairness towards the education students whose classes have been halved without consultation and have not been informed of this decision. NUSA also believes this goes against what fairness means to individuals in the University Code of Conduct in that Professor Germov has failed to, “share or provide equitable access to relevant and appropriate information and knowledge.”

NUSA believes that this failure to make the information available to the student population infringes upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�resholds Standard) 2011. In the introduction to Section 6, it states that:

�e higher education provider documents its responsibilities to students and meets its responsibilities to students, including through the provision of information...

On a more serious level the comments made by Professor Germov infringe upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�reshold Standards) 2011. �e comment that student’s opinions on pedagogical matters were irrelevant, NUSA believes that it contradicts section 3.8 of the Higher Education Standards Framework which states that

...maintenance of academic standards, with appropriate mechanisms for external input, in accordance with international conventions for good academic practise...

Surely Education students should be consulted on pedagogical issues as it is something that they will have to deal with throughout the entirety of their degree and their career as teachers.

�e hidden cuts to face-to-face teaching have not only a�ected student’s learning time but have also impinged upon their ability to seek proper support concerning this issue, which NUSA believes is yet again another violation of Higher Education Standards Framework, this time section 6.6 which states:

Students are informed of and have appropriate access to:

Advocacy support, for example in relation to the higher education provider’s academic and procedural rules; and,

A range of personal support services adequate to meet the needs of the student body, such as counselling, health, welfare, accommodation and career services provided by appropriately quali�ed personnel.

NUSA believes that face-to-face-teaching is critical to a student’s understanding of a course. As students we pay for our education, be it full international student fees or deferred HECS payments, and this is one of the reasons that we demand the following:

• Cuts in face-to-face teaching in semester two education courses be reversed• Education students are consulted on any further changes which reduce face-to-face teaching• All pedagogical arguments for reducing face-to-face teaching are made publically available.

NUSA would also like to comment on the lack of reduction in International and HECS fee costs for the a�ected courses. Surely the reduction in hours means less expense, therefore lower International and HECS fees.

�e cuts in face-to-face teaching are part of a broader move towards online teaching. NUSA believes that many students’ stance on this issue is correctly summed up by one of the students that we canvassed who said:

“�e University can barely manage MyHub and Blackboard. �ey seriously think they can deliver courses online?? So many lecturers cannot even work Blackboard etc. How are they going to cope?”

Hayley HoworthNUSA Vice-President 2012NUSA Education O�cer 2013

13

Page 16: Opus November

At the beginning of semester two, NUSA discovered that Education courses had su�ered cuts in face-to-face teaching. NUSA was alerted to these cuts by a concerned student who noticed a di�erence in their class scheduling and their actual class. �is student stated that,

"this is further evidence of the continuing decline in quality of teacher-training at this University."

Following on from this concern, NUSA submitted a letter to the Pro Vice Chancellor of the Faculty of Education and Arts Professor Germov. In this letter NUSA asked for the following:

• A list of the a�ected courses• Information regarding the process of student consultation used for these decisions• An explanation regarding the lack of information given to students about these changes• Suspension of all reductions until a proper process has been followed including student consultation and o�cial student noti�cations

After submitting our letter, we were contacted and a meeting was arranged between NUSA representatives and the Pro Vice Chancellor for the Faculty of Education and Arts, Prof. Germov.

NUSA launched a petition as a result of the meeting between Pro Vice Chancellor Professor Germov and the NUSA representatives. �e NUSA representatives who attended the meeting with Professor Germov reported that the PVC was �ustered and referred to NUSA’s submission as overreaction and alarmist.

NUSA was informed that there are 111 second year education courses at the University of Newcastle in semester two, 56 of which had

more than 26 hours of teaching time across the semester and of these, 30 had been impacted by reductions.

Prof. Germov also stated that these changes occurred to ensure “equity of delivery” and would improve the quality of the courses. At no point did Prof. Germov refer to any evidence that consultation of Education students occurred, only referring to the fact that these decisions had been made by Academics and Student’s opinions were not relevant on pedagogical matters.

�e NUSA representatives pointed out that of all students, it would be natural to assume that those studying education to become teachers, would take an interest in pedagogical matters. After all, it is to become a core element of their future careers. Prof. Germov seemed unpersuaded by such arguments. Further, NUSA submitted that the students should have been informed that the teaching-time in their classes had been cut. Prof. Germov eventually agreed that all students in a�ected courses would be informed.

Lastly, NUSA representatives requested that students be informed and consulted about any further measures to reduce face-to-face teaching. Prof. Germov restated his position that the Academics are “the experts” on these matters, not students.

NUSA believes that the University of Newcastle’s Code of Conduct, which is applicable to both sta� and students, has been violated in a number of ways. �is code of conduct is something we agree to abide by and uphold the values instilled within when we commence our studies. �ese �ve values are honesty, fairness, trust, accountability and respect. All students and sta� at the University are expected to conform to its principles. More information on the code of conduct, and the �ve values, can be found on the University website.(http://www.newcastle.edu.au/Resources/Divisions/Services/Human%20Resource%20Services/code-of-conduct.pdf)

On the 1st of August 2012 NUSA launched a Petition in regards to cuts in face-to-face teaching time in Education courses. A total of 342 people signed this petition against these cuts. At the same time Education students were invited to comment on these cuts and here is what they had to say:

“We are doing an education course - a course which equips you to teach face to face in a classroom. Tutorials where there has been more face to face teaching has equipped me better with resources, as well as skills.”

“Tutors will tell us several times in tutorials that the reason they are rushing is because they need to condense their lessons from, for example, 13 to 12. Tutors shouldn't have to explain and apologize for this.”

“�is is atrocious. It looks like a cover up and is not acceptable. Students should be consulted about changes of this magnitude.”

“It is APPALLING and completely unfair. It puts us at a disadvantage academically & we are unable to cover the course in enough detail.”

“We should be informed so that we can look at alternate methods of studying if necessary.”

“We pay for our education and if the University does not consult with us, how do they know that we want more/less face-to-face time. I could have just gone to the Open University, but I value having human interaction. It makes my courses make sense.”

“Outrageous! All education students should have been consulted and informed about this decision. To keep it hidden from the student population is deceitful on the university's part.”

“�e nature of our education courses are dependent on face-to-face contact. Every tutor is di�erent and imparts their own experiences and interpretations to us -something that is highly valued for us as future teachers. Discussing and re�ecting on our own schooling experiences and sharing these with our classmates is something that cannot be replaced with online. �ese discussions

need to be facilitated by the tutor in a class setting; otherwise we would never learn from each other's schooling and prac experiences.”

NUSA believes that the cuts to face-to-face teaching without consultation is a direct violation of the University’s code of conduct. Under the de�nition of respect the Code of Conduct states that respect, “means valuing others’ ideas and contributions.”

NUSA submits that Prof. Germov de�nitely does not value or respect the Education Student’s opinions on how their Education should be conducted.

NUSA was also alarmed to hear rumours that these cuts could just be the �rst of many cuts to come. Prof. Germov seems loathe to share information about these rumoured cuts with students, which NUSA believes violates the Code of Conduct in that Prof. Germov is not being transparent with students and has not been from the very beginning. Prof. Germov is not showing Fairness towards the education students whose classes have been halved without consultation and have not been informed of this decision. NUSA also believes this goes against what fairness means to individuals in the University Code of Conduct in that Professor Germov has failed to, “share or provide equitable access to relevant and appropriate information and knowledge.”

NUSA believes that this failure to make the information available to the student population infringes upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�resholds Standard) 2011. In the introduction to Section 6, it states that:

�e higher education provider documents its responsibilities to students and meets its responsibilities to students, including through the provision of information...

On a more serious level the comments made by Professor Germov infringe upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�reshold Standards) 2011. �e comment that student’s opinions on pedagogical matters were irrelevant, NUSA believes that it contradicts section 3.8 of the Higher Education Standards Framework which states that

...maintenance of academic standards, with appropriate mechanisms for external input, in accordance with international conventions for good academic practise...

Surely Education students should be consulted on pedagogical issues as it is something that they will have to deal with throughout the entirety of their degree and their career as teachers.

�e hidden cuts to face-to-face teaching have not only a�ected student’s learning time but have also impinged upon their ability to seek proper support concerning this issue, which NUSA believes is yet again another violation of Higher Education Standards Framework, this time section 6.6 which states:

Students are informed of and have appropriate access to:

Advocacy support, for example in relation to the higher education provider’s academic and procedural rules; and,

A range of personal support services adequate to meet the needs of the student body, such as counselling, health, welfare, accommodation and career services provided by appropriately quali�ed personnel.

NUSA believes that face-to-face-teaching is critical to a student’s understanding of a course. As students we pay for our education, be it full international student fees or deferred HECS payments, and this is one of the reasons that we demand the following:

• Cuts in face-to-face teaching in semester two education courses be reversed• Education students are consulted on any further changes which reduce face-to-face teaching• All pedagogical arguments for reducing face-to-face teaching are made publically available.

NUSA would also like to comment on the lack of reduction in International and HECS fee costs for the a�ected courses. Surely the reduction in hours means less expense, therefore lower International and HECS fees.

�e cuts in face-to-face teaching are part of a broader move towards online teaching. NUSA believes that many students’ stance on this issue is correctly summed up by one of the students that we canvassed who said:

“�e University can barely manage MyHub and Blackboard. �ey seriously think they can deliver courses online?? So many lecturers cannot even work Blackboard etc. How are they going to cope?”

Hayley HoworthNUSA Vice-President 2012NUSA Education O�cer 2013

14

Page 17: Opus November

At the beginning of semester two, NUSA discovered that Education courses had su�ered cuts in face-to-face teaching. NUSA was alerted to these cuts by a concerned student who noticed a di�erence in their class scheduling and their actual class. �is student stated that,

"this is further evidence of the continuing decline in quality of teacher-training at this University."

Following on from this concern, NUSA submitted a letter to the Pro Vice Chancellor of the Faculty of Education and Arts Professor Germov. In this letter NUSA asked for the following:

• A list of the a�ected courses• Information regarding the process of student consultation used for these decisions• An explanation regarding the lack of information given to students about these changes• Suspension of all reductions until a proper process has been followed including student consultation and o�cial student noti�cations

After submitting our letter, we were contacted and a meeting was arranged between NUSA representatives and the Pro Vice Chancellor for the Faculty of Education and Arts, Prof. Germov.

NUSA launched a petition as a result of the meeting between Pro Vice Chancellor Professor Germov and the NUSA representatives. �e NUSA representatives who attended the meeting with Professor Germov reported that the PVC was �ustered and referred to NUSA’s submission as overreaction and alarmist.

NUSA was informed that there are 111 second year education courses at the University of Newcastle in semester two, 56 of which had

more than 26 hours of teaching time across the semester and of these, 30 had been impacted by reductions.

Prof. Germov also stated that these changes occurred to ensure “equity of delivery” and would improve the quality of the courses. At no point did Prof. Germov refer to any evidence that consultation of Education students occurred, only referring to the fact that these decisions had been made by Academics and Student’s opinions were not relevant on pedagogical matters.

�e NUSA representatives pointed out that of all students, it would be natural to assume that those studying education to become teachers, would take an interest in pedagogical matters. After all, it is to become a core element of their future careers. Prof. Germov seemed unpersuaded by such arguments. Further, NUSA submitted that the students should have been informed that the teaching-time in their classes had been cut. Prof. Germov eventually agreed that all students in a�ected courses would be informed.

Lastly, NUSA representatives requested that students be informed and consulted about any further measures to reduce face-to-face teaching. Prof. Germov restated his position that the Academics are “the experts” on these matters, not students.

NUSA believes that the University of Newcastle’s Code of Conduct, which is applicable to both sta� and students, has been violated in a number of ways. �is code of conduct is something we agree to abide by and uphold the values instilled within when we commence our studies. �ese �ve values are honesty, fairness, trust, accountability and respect. All students and sta� at the University are expected to conform to its principles. More information on the code of conduct, and the �ve values, can be found on the University website.(http://www.newcastle.edu.au/Resources/Divisions/Services/Human%20Resource%20Services/code-of-conduct.pdf)

On the 1st of August 2012 NUSA launched a Petition in regards to cuts in face-to-face teaching time in Education courses. A total of 342 people signed this petition against these cuts. At the same time Education students were invited to comment on these cuts and here is what they had to say:

“We are doing an education course - a course which equips you to teach face to face in a classroom. Tutorials where there has been more face to face teaching has equipped me better with resources, as well as skills.”

“Tutors will tell us several times in tutorials that the reason they are rushing is because they need to condense their lessons from, for example, 13 to 12. Tutors shouldn't have to explain and apologize for this.”

“�is is atrocious. It looks like a cover up and is not acceptable. Students should be consulted about changes of this magnitude.”

“It is APPALLING and completely unfair. It puts us at a disadvantage academically & we are unable to cover the course in enough detail.”

“We should be informed so that we can look at alternate methods of studying if necessary.”

“We pay for our education and if the University does not consult with us, how do they know that we want more/less face-to-face time. I could have just gone to the Open University, but I value having human interaction. It makes my courses make sense.”

“Outrageous! All education students should have been consulted and informed about this decision. To keep it hidden from the student population is deceitful on the university's part.”

“�e nature of our education courses are dependent on face-to-face contact. Every tutor is di�erent and imparts their own experiences and interpretations to us -something that is highly valued for us as future teachers. Discussing and re�ecting on our own schooling experiences and sharing these with our classmates is something that cannot be replaced with online. �ese discussions

need to be facilitated by the tutor in a class setting; otherwise we would never learn from each other's schooling and prac experiences.”

NUSA believes that the cuts to face-to-face teaching without consultation is a direct violation of the University’s code of conduct. Under the de�nition of respect the Code of Conduct states that respect, “means valuing others’ ideas and contributions.”

NUSA submits that Prof. Germov de�nitely does not value or respect the Education Student’s opinions on how their Education should be conducted.

NUSA was also alarmed to hear rumours that these cuts could just be the �rst of many cuts to come. Prof. Germov seems loathe to share information about these rumoured cuts with students, which NUSA believes violates the Code of Conduct in that Prof. Germov is not being transparent with students and has not been from the very beginning. Prof. Germov is not showing Fairness towards the education students whose classes have been halved without consultation and have not been informed of this decision. NUSA also believes this goes against what fairness means to individuals in the University Code of Conduct in that Professor Germov has failed to, “share or provide equitable access to relevant and appropriate information and knowledge.”

NUSA believes that this failure to make the information available to the student population infringes upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�resholds Standard) 2011. In the introduction to Section 6, it states that:

�e higher education provider documents its responsibilities to students and meets its responsibilities to students, including through the provision of information...

On a more serious level the comments made by Professor Germov infringe upon the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Higher Education Standards Framework (�reshold Standards) 2011. �e comment that student’s opinions on pedagogical matters were irrelevant, NUSA believes that it contradicts section 3.8 of the Higher Education Standards Framework which states that

...maintenance of academic standards, with appropriate mechanisms for external input, in accordance with international conventions for good academic practise...

Surely Education students should be consulted on pedagogical issues as it is something that they will have to deal with throughout the entirety of their degree and their career as teachers.

�e hidden cuts to face-to-face teaching have not only a�ected student’s learning time but have also impinged upon their ability to seek proper support concerning this issue, which NUSA believes is yet again another violation of Higher Education Standards Framework, this time section 6.6 which states:

Students are informed of and have appropriate access to:

Advocacy support, for example in relation to the higher education provider’s academic and procedural rules; and,

A range of personal support services adequate to meet the needs of the student body, such as counselling, health, welfare, accommodation and career services provided by appropriately quali�ed personnel.

NUSA believes that face-to-face-teaching is critical to a student’s understanding of a course. As students we pay for our education, be it full international student fees or deferred HECS payments, and this is one of the reasons that we demand the following:

• Cuts in face-to-face teaching in semester two education courses be reversed• Education students are consulted on any further changes which reduce face-to-face teaching• All pedagogical arguments for reducing face-to-face teaching are made publically available.

NUSA would also like to comment on the lack of reduction in International and HECS fee costs for the a�ected courses. Surely the reduction in hours means less expense, therefore lower International and HECS fees.

�e cuts in face-to-face teaching are part of a broader move towards online teaching. NUSA believes that many students’ stance on this issue is correctly summed up by one of the students that we canvassed who said:

“�e University can barely manage MyHub and Blackboard. �ey seriously think they can deliver courses online?? So many lecturers cannot even work Blackboard etc. How are they going to cope?”

Hayley HoworthNUSA Vice-President 2012NUSA Education O�cer 2013

14

Page 18: Opus November

During semester 2 NUSA representatives gathered student opinion about the lighting on campus. �is issue was raised with NUSA while collecting data for a survey concerning lighting o� campus. After canvassing student opinion further, NUSA has found that the lighting currently placed around Callaghan campus is insu�cient according to many students. NUSA does not believe a student should have to carry around their own �ashlight on campus if they want to see at night.

�e question sheet used was simple and direct, asking students to point out areas they believed needed more lighting, lighting more frequently, or areas where the lighting wasn’t turned on. �e highest demand was for more lighting. As the map shows the most common areas that students showed concern with are the areas

ON CAMPUS LIGHTING

shaded and the pathways outlined. �e areas indicated, aside from the engineering parking lot, are the most travelled within the university. �is suggests the standard of lighting needs improvement throughout the entire campus.

Reading through comments made by students has revealed their general unease at walking around the campus at night due to the poor lighting. Security however is not the only issue, one conversation with students revealed that poor visibility has almost caused clashes between students on foot and those on bikes. �e Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 states in 6.3

�e higher education provider promotes an inclusive and safe culture, ensures there are appropriate security arrangements for all its locations...

NUSA awaits the University to acknowledge students safety issues by increasing the lighting on campus.

17

Page 19: Opus November

During semester 2 NUSA representatives gathered student opinion about the lighting on campus. �is issue was raised with NUSA while collecting data for a survey concerning lighting o� campus. After canvassing student opinion further, NUSA has found that the lighting currently placed around Callaghan campus is insu�cient according to many students. NUSA does not believe a student should have to carry around their own �ashlight on campus if they want to see at night.

�e question sheet used was simple and direct, asking students to point out areas they believed needed more lighting, lighting more frequently, or areas where the lighting wasn’t turned on. �e highest demand was for more lighting. As the map shows the most common areas that students showed concern with are the areas

ON CAMPUS LIGHTING

shaded and the pathways outlined. �e areas indicated, aside from the engineering parking lot, are the most travelled within the university. �is suggests the standard of lighting needs improvement throughout the entire campus.

Reading through comments made by students has revealed their general unease at walking around the campus at night due to the poor lighting. Security however is not the only issue, one conversation with students revealed that poor visibility has almost caused clashes between students on foot and those on bikes. �e Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 states in 6.3

�e higher education provider promotes an inclusive and safe culture, ensures there are appropriate security arrangements for all its locations...

NUSA awaits the University to acknowledge students safety issues by increasing the lighting on campus.

17

Page 20: Opus November

GLORIAJEANS BOYCOTT�e co�ee chain Gloria Jeans has found itself in hot water after customers have begun to boycott the stores - not because of the debatable quality of the co�ee, but because of the stores connection to the anti-gay groups; Australian Christian Lobby and the Family First Party. So is this all a storm in a teacup or are the public justi�ed in its uproar?

Gay marriage has become one of the most topical issues of this year, especially with increasing international pressure as many world leaders such as Barrack Obama, David Cameron, Stephan Harper and John Key, pledge their support for the issue. With the conscience vote fast approaching, Australian leaders must soon decide their stance on the issue. But with the politicians in parliament voting for us, what power do the public have? If the uproar against Gloria Jean’s signi�es anything, it is that consumers have found their power through their wallets.

�e controversy started when the Australian Electoral Commission webpage reported that Gloria Jeans had donated $30000 to the Australia Christian Lobby just before the 2010 elections, where it was actively lobbying against same sex marriage. �is elicited uproar within the LGBT and gay-friendly community. A boycott was soon organised, with more than 8,000 people joining the boycott’s Facebook page. �e incident was a PR disaster, with people bombarding Gloria Jeans through the social media including Facebook and Twitter. �e incident was not helped by the fact that Gloria Jeans has also donated thousands of dollars to the Family First in 2005, and its two founder members are active participants in the Hillsong church, which has previously o�ered

“ex-gay” and gay “therapy” sessions in the past. Gloria Jeans has since made a statement saying

“we embrace equality and diversity”, as well as clarifying that it has “no a�liation to any beliefs or preferences”, however it refused to declare its stance on same-sex marriage.

Across the paci�c, Starbucks USA gained its own boycott by the National Organisation for Marriage in the form of a “dump Starbucks” ad campaign, after its leaders publically announced their support for the legislation of Gay Marriage, ultimately gathering 17,500 pledges to avoid Starbucks. However, SumofUs.org organised a counterattack with more than 141,800 people signing a thank you card for their support of Same-sex marriage.

�e real grinding question is: are these boycotts e�ective, and if so, are they moral?

Although a large number agreed to avoid the co�ee chain, it is hard to how much this will a�ect the corporation, as ultimately people all over Australia are still buying their co�ees, and while a loss is still a loss, it is inevitable that when the news dies away, customers will return. After all, Gloria Jean’s association with the controversial Hillsong Church has hardly been a secret, and yet many non-religious and even anti-religious continue to buy co�ees. Overall these boycotts may not have a signi�cant impact on these mega corporations, but they do a�ect the franchise employees and the owners. Is it therefore sel�sh for customers to boycott these stores that ultimately have no say in where the donations go to?

On the other side, these employees and franchise owners are choosing to work these companies, with many of them knowing their political opinions, so is it therefore the responsi-bility of the company �gureheads to keep their opinions to themselves, and withhold their donations from political causes? Many custom-ers are complaining with a lack of transparency,

as it was only when the donations came to light for an outside source did the company admit to them, and even then the ACL claimed they were merely payments for advertising. �is may only lead to Gloria Jean’s being more honest about its donations, rather than halt them although, against many of the boycotters’ wishes.

An old man with a guitar once sang “�e times they are-a changing”, Corporations have become so powerful that the beliefs and actions of the �gureheads can have a profound e�ect on the community, and therefore they have a social responsibility as being active members of their nation. �e problem is that their actions may not always be agreed with by their customers. �e Gloria Jean’s Boycott has shown that although companies maintain their right to free speech and political allegiance, customers have the right to choose where they want to spend their money. Now customers are becoming more aware of exactly where they are going, companies may have to wake up and smell the

co�ee and be increasingly careful with their public image, and be sure what they believe in and support wont e�ect their sales. Whether this is for better or worse, the recent boycotts are a testimony for the power of the public and the consumer.

�e important thing is to realise that these people have a freedom of speech, and are allowed to believe whatever they wish, as long as they do not break any laws of go against the codes of practise. However, we as customers have the same freedom, and we have the power to not give our money to these companies. Whether it is right or wrong for the companies and the consumers to act as they do, it is ultimately up to the individual.

NOT JUST A FLUID ISSUE

18

�e co�ee chain Gloria Jeans has found itself in hot water after customers have begun to boycott the stores - not because of the debatable quality of the co�ee, but because of the stores connection to the anti-gay groups; Australian Christian Lobby and the Family First Party. So is this all a storm in a teacup or are the public justi�ed in its uproar?

Gay marriage has become one of the most topical issues of this year, especially with increasing international pressure as many world leaders such as Barrack Obama, David Cameron, Stephan Harper and John Key, pledge their support for the issue. With the conscience vote fast approaching, Australian leaders must soon decide their stance on the issue. But with the politicians in parliament voting for us, what power do the public have? If the uproar against Gloria Jean’s signi�es anything, it is that consumers have found their power through their wallets.

�e controversy started when the Australian Electoral Commission webpage reported that Gloria Jeans had donated $30000 to the Australia Christian Lobby just before the 2010 elections, where it was actively lobbying against same sex marriage. �is elicited uproar within the LGBT and gay-friendly community. A boycott was soon organised, with more than 8,000 people joining the boycott’s Facebook page. �e incident was a PR disaster, with people bombarding Gloria Jeans through the social media including Facebook and Twitter. �e incident was not helped by the fact that Gloria Jeans has also donated thousands of dollars to the Family First in 2005, and its two founder members are active participants in the Hillsong church, which has previously o�ered

“ex-gay” and gay “therapy” sessions in the past. Gloria Jeans has since made a statement saying

“we embrace equality and diversity”, as well as clarifying that it has “no a�liation to any beliefs or preferences”, however it refused to declare its stance on same-sex marriage.

Across the paci�c, Starbucks USA gained its own boycott by the National Organisation for Marriage in the form of a “dump Starbucks” ad campaign, after its leaders publically announced their support for the legislation of Gay Marriage, ultimately gathering 17,500 pledges to avoid Starbucks. However, SumofUs.org organised a counterattack with more than 141,800 people signing a thank you card for their support of Same-sex marriage.

�e real grinding question is: are these boycotts e�ective, and if so, are they moral?

Although a large number agreed to avoid the co�ee chain, it is hard to how much this will a�ect the corporation, as ultimately people all over Australia are still buying their co�ees, and while a loss is still a loss, it is inevitable that when the news dies away, customers will return. After all, Gloria Jean’s association with the controversial Hillsong Church has hardly been a secret, and yet many non-religious and even anti-religious continue to buy co�ees. Overall these boycotts may not have a signi�cant impact on these mega corporations, but they do a�ect the franchise employees and the owners. Is it therefore sel�sh for customers to boycott these stores that ultimately have no say in where the donations go to?

On the other side, these employees and franchise owners are choosing to work these companies, with many of them knowing their political opinions, so is it therefore the responsi-bility of the company �gureheads to keep their opinions to themselves, and withhold their donations from political causes? Many custom-ers are complaining with a lack of transparency,

as it was only when the donations came to light for an outside source did the company admit to them, and even then the ACL claimed they were merely payments for advertising. �is may only lead to Gloria Jean’s being more honest about its donations, rather than halt them although, against many of the boycotters’ wishes.

An old man with a guitar once sang “�e times they are-a changing”, Corporations have become so powerful that the beliefs and actions of the �gureheads can have a profound e�ect on the community, and therefore they have a social responsibility as being active members of their nation. �e problem is that their actions may not always be agreed with by their customers. �e Gloria Jean’s Boycott has shown that although companies maintain their right to free speech and political allegiance, customers have the right to choose where they want to spend their money. Now customers are becoming more aware of exactly where they are going, companies may have to wake up and smell the

co�ee and be increasingly careful with their public image, and be sure what they believe in and support wont e�ect their sales. Whether this is for better or worse, the recent boycotts are a testimony for the power of the public and the consumer.

�e important thing is to realise that these people have a freedom of speech, and are allowed to believe whatever they wish, as long as they do not break any laws of go against the codes of practise. However, we as customers have the same freedom, and we have the power to not give our money to these companies. Whether it is right or wrong for the companies and the consumers to act as they do, it is ultimately up to the individual.

LEWIS WISDEN

- Cereal - Toast - Tea - - Coffee - Jam - Juice -

All day, everyday @Free Breakfast

19

Page 21: Opus November

GLORIAJEANS BOYCOTT�e co�ee chain Gloria Jeans has found itself in hot water after customers have begun to boycott the stores - not because of the debatable quality of the co�ee, but because of the stores connection to the anti-gay groups; Australian Christian Lobby and the Family First Party. So is this all a storm in a teacup or are the public justi�ed in its uproar?

Gay marriage has become one of the most topical issues of this year, especially with increasing international pressure as many world leaders such as Barrack Obama, David Cameron, Stephan Harper and John Key, pledge their support for the issue. With the conscience vote fast approaching, Australian leaders must soon decide their stance on the issue. But with the politicians in parliament voting for us, what power do the public have? If the uproar against Gloria Jean’s signi�es anything, it is that consumers have found their power through their wallets.

�e controversy started when the Australian Electoral Commission webpage reported that Gloria Jeans had donated $30000 to the Australia Christian Lobby just before the 2010 elections, where it was actively lobbying against same sex marriage. �is elicited uproar within the LGBT and gay-friendly community. A boycott was soon organised, with more than 8,000 people joining the boycott’s Facebook page. �e incident was a PR disaster, with people bombarding Gloria Jeans through the social media including Facebook and Twitter. �e incident was not helped by the fact that Gloria Jeans has also donated thousands of dollars to the Family First in 2005, and its two founder members are active participants in the Hillsong church, which has previously o�ered

“ex-gay” and gay “therapy” sessions in the past. Gloria Jeans has since made a statement saying

“we embrace equality and diversity”, as well as clarifying that it has “no a�liation to any beliefs or preferences”, however it refused to declare its stance on same-sex marriage.

Across the paci�c, Starbucks USA gained its own boycott by the National Organisation for Marriage in the form of a “dump Starbucks” ad campaign, after its leaders publically announced their support for the legislation of Gay Marriage, ultimately gathering 17,500 pledges to avoid Starbucks. However, SumofUs.org organised a counterattack with more than 141,800 people signing a thank you card for their support of Same-sex marriage.

�e real grinding question is: are these boycotts e�ective, and if so, are they moral?

Although a large number agreed to avoid the co�ee chain, it is hard to how much this will a�ect the corporation, as ultimately people all over Australia are still buying their co�ees, and while a loss is still a loss, it is inevitable that when the news dies away, customers will return. After all, Gloria Jean’s association with the controversial Hillsong Church has hardly been a secret, and yet many non-religious and even anti-religious continue to buy co�ees. Overall these boycotts may not have a signi�cant impact on these mega corporations, but they do a�ect the franchise employees and the owners. Is it therefore sel�sh for customers to boycott these stores that ultimately have no say in where the donations go to?

On the other side, these employees and franchise owners are choosing to work these companies, with many of them knowing their political opinions, so is it therefore the responsi-bility of the company �gureheads to keep their opinions to themselves, and withhold their donations from political causes? Many custom-ers are complaining with a lack of transparency,

as it was only when the donations came to light for an outside source did the company admit to them, and even then the ACL claimed they were merely payments for advertising. �is may only lead to Gloria Jean’s being more honest about its donations, rather than halt them although, against many of the boycotters’ wishes.

An old man with a guitar once sang “�e times they are-a changing”, Corporations have become so powerful that the beliefs and actions of the �gureheads can have a profound e�ect on the community, and therefore they have a social responsibility as being active members of their nation. �e problem is that their actions may not always be agreed with by their customers. �e Gloria Jean’s Boycott has shown that although companies maintain their right to free speech and political allegiance, customers have the right to choose where they want to spend their money. Now customers are becoming more aware of exactly where they are going, companies may have to wake up and smell the

co�ee and be increasingly careful with their public image, and be sure what they believe in and support wont e�ect their sales. Whether this is for better or worse, the recent boycotts are a testimony for the power of the public and the consumer.

�e important thing is to realise that these people have a freedom of speech, and are allowed to believe whatever they wish, as long as they do not break any laws of go against the codes of practise. However, we as customers have the same freedom, and we have the power to not give our money to these companies. Whether it is right or wrong for the companies and the consumers to act as they do, it is ultimately up to the individual.

NOT JUST A FLUID ISSUE

18

�e co�ee chain Gloria Jeans has found itself in hot water after customers have begun to boycott the stores - not because of the debatable quality of the co�ee, but because of the stores connection to the anti-gay groups; Australian Christian Lobby and the Family First Party. So is this all a storm in a teacup or are the public justi�ed in its uproar?

Gay marriage has become one of the most topical issues of this year, especially with increasing international pressure as many world leaders such as Barrack Obama, David Cameron, Stephan Harper and John Key, pledge their support for the issue. With the conscience vote fast approaching, Australian leaders must soon decide their stance on the issue. But with the politicians in parliament voting for us, what power do the public have? If the uproar against Gloria Jean’s signi�es anything, it is that consumers have found their power through their wallets.

�e controversy started when the Australian Electoral Commission webpage reported that Gloria Jeans had donated $30000 to the Australia Christian Lobby just before the 2010 elections, where it was actively lobbying against same sex marriage. �is elicited uproar within the LGBT and gay-friendly community. A boycott was soon organised, with more than 8,000 people joining the boycott’s Facebook page. �e incident was a PR disaster, with people bombarding Gloria Jeans through the social media including Facebook and Twitter. �e incident was not helped by the fact that Gloria Jeans has also donated thousands of dollars to the Family First in 2005, and its two founder members are active participants in the Hillsong church, which has previously o�ered

“ex-gay” and gay “therapy” sessions in the past. Gloria Jeans has since made a statement saying

“we embrace equality and diversity”, as well as clarifying that it has “no a�liation to any beliefs or preferences”, however it refused to declare its stance on same-sex marriage.

Across the paci�c, Starbucks USA gained its own boycott by the National Organisation for Marriage in the form of a “dump Starbucks” ad campaign, after its leaders publically announced their support for the legislation of Gay Marriage, ultimately gathering 17,500 pledges to avoid Starbucks. However, SumofUs.org organised a counterattack with more than 141,800 people signing a thank you card for their support of Same-sex marriage.

�e real grinding question is: are these boycotts e�ective, and if so, are they moral?

Although a large number agreed to avoid the co�ee chain, it is hard to how much this will a�ect the corporation, as ultimately people all over Australia are still buying their co�ees, and while a loss is still a loss, it is inevitable that when the news dies away, customers will return. After all, Gloria Jean’s association with the controversial Hillsong Church has hardly been a secret, and yet many non-religious and even anti-religious continue to buy co�ees. Overall these boycotts may not have a signi�cant impact on these mega corporations, but they do a�ect the franchise employees and the owners. Is it therefore sel�sh for customers to boycott these stores that ultimately have no say in where the donations go to?

On the other side, these employees and franchise owners are choosing to work these companies, with many of them knowing their political opinions, so is it therefore the responsi-bility of the company �gureheads to keep their opinions to themselves, and withhold their donations from political causes? Many custom-ers are complaining with a lack of transparency,

as it was only when the donations came to light for an outside source did the company admit to them, and even then the ACL claimed they were merely payments for advertising. �is may only lead to Gloria Jean’s being more honest about its donations, rather than halt them although, against many of the boycotters’ wishes.

An old man with a guitar once sang “�e times they are-a changing”, Corporations have become so powerful that the beliefs and actions of the �gureheads can have a profound e�ect on the community, and therefore they have a social responsibility as being active members of their nation. �e problem is that their actions may not always be agreed with by their customers. �e Gloria Jean’s Boycott has shown that although companies maintain their right to free speech and political allegiance, customers have the right to choose where they want to spend their money. Now customers are becoming more aware of exactly where they are going, companies may have to wake up and smell the

co�ee and be increasingly careful with their public image, and be sure what they believe in and support wont e�ect their sales. Whether this is for better or worse, the recent boycotts are a testimony for the power of the public and the consumer.

�e important thing is to realise that these people have a freedom of speech, and are allowed to believe whatever they wish, as long as they do not break any laws of go against the codes of practise. However, we as customers have the same freedom, and we have the power to not give our money to these companies. Whether it is right or wrong for the companies and the consumers to act as they do, it is ultimately up to the individual.

LEWIS WISDEN

- Cereal - Toast - Tea - - Coffee - Jam - Juice -

All day, everyday @Free Breakfast

19

Page 22: Opus November

LABORCLUB“WE WERE OUTSIDE TRADES HALL DOING THE PROTEST THING AND THE VOTE INSIDE AT THE CONVENTION WAS WON BY A COUPLE OF VOTES AND I REMEMBER THINKING IT MIGHT BE WORTHWHILE BEING IN THERE RATHER THAN OUT HERE PROTESTING.” Penny Wong, Finance Minister, talking about the introduction of HECS and why she became involved in politics.

Who is the Labor club?We are the uno�cial face of the ALP on campus - which means we are are not a�liated with the party and have a little more freedom than the rest of the ALP.

What do you guys do?We’re more of a social club than a political organsiation. Don’t get me wrong, we’re Labor supporters but we enjoy having a beverage as much as shaping policy.

So, you guys are just booze hounds?WE WISH! We have many active members who are part of Newcastle Labor and Young Labor. While we do get involved with some things, such as harassing the uni for a better deal for students, the club is mainly social.

Why would I join?It’s a fun, social, commitment free way to see if politics might be for you. We’re not dictators - you can come to a get together and see if it’s your thing. If it is, then great! If not, that’s cool, at least you’ve satis�ed your curiosity!

Remember that every politician had to start somewhere.

I don’t care about politics.Our advice? �ink of something that you’re passionate about, �nd out as much as you can about it and get involved in it. You have a right to have your voice heard - annoy those in charge until they hear you!

Does Labor have relevance in modern Australia?Labor has done a great job in securing and protecting the working rights for all people - including you.

Labor will continue to do this while moving on to other important things, like sharing the wealth around, tackling climate change and sustainability, building the NBN and looking after the most vulnerable people in Australia.

Without Labor, Australia would still be under Workchoices, ignoring climate change, running on ADSL and without an National Disability Insurance Scheme.

“I joined the ALP to make a di�erence in society, to help working people and to support

the future prosperity of our country. I am driven by the importance of equity, social justice and compassion.

�e Labor Party is the party of progress. We do not shy from tough decisions, we embrace sound public policies and �ght for what is right in the interests of the nation.

I encourage each of you to not stand on the sidelines but to embrace every opportunity that presents itself and to act on the values that motivate you. After all, you are our future.”

Greg Combet, Minister for Climate Change, talking about why he joined the ALP - for this article!

Will I get harassed to join the ALP?Nah, we’re not a cult. You don’t have to be a member to come along or to join UoN Labor Club and we wont harass you about it. You don’t have to sign up or commit to anything.

I don’t really get politics...What better place to learn? We don’t hate in the Labor Club. Most members agree that we have learned a billion times more than we used to know since joining! So come along - you might be surprised at how much fun you have!

20

Who is the Labor club?We are the uno�cial face of the ALP on campus - which means we are are not a�liated with the party and have a little more freedom than the rest of the ALP.

What do you guys do?We’re more of a social club than a political organsiation. Don’t get me wrong, we’re Labor supporters but we enjoy having a beverage as much as shaping policy.

So, you guys are just booze hounds?WE WISH! We have many active members who are part of Newcastle Labor and Young Labor. While we do get involved with some things, such as harassing the uni for a better deal for students, the club is mainly social.

Why would I join?It’s a fun, social, commitment free way to see if politics might be for you. We’re not dictators - you can come to a get together and see if it’s your thing. If it is, then great! If not, that’s cool, at least you’ve satis�ed your curiosity!

Remember that every politician had to start somewhere.

I don’t care about politics.Our advice? �ink of something that you’re passionate about, �nd out as much as you can about it and get involved in it. You have a right to have your voice heard - annoy those in charge until they hear you!

Does Labor have relevance in modern Australia?Labor has done a great job in securing and protecting the working rights for all people - including you.

Labor will continue to do this while moving on to other important things, like sharing the wealth around, tackling climate change and sustainability, building the NBN and looking after the most vulnerable people in Australia.

Without Labor, Australia would still be under Workchoices, ignoring climate change, running on ADSL and without an National Disability Insurance Scheme.

“I joined the ALP to make a di�erence in society, to help working people and to support

the future prosperity of our country. I am driven by the importance of equity, social justice and compassion.

�e Labor Party is the party of progress. We do not shy from tough decisions, we embrace sound public policies and �ght for what is right in the interests of the nation.

I encourage each of you to not stand on the sidelines but to embrace every opportunity that presents itself and to act on the values that motivate you. After all, you are our future.”

Greg Combet, Minister for Climate Change, talking about why he joined the ALP - for this article!

Will I get harassed to join the ALP?Nah, we’re not a cult. You don’t have to be a member to come along or to join UoN Labor Club and we wont harass you about it. You don’t have to sign up or commit to anything.

I don’t really get politics...What better place to learn? We don’t hate in the Labor Club. Most members agree that we have learned a billion times more than we used to know since joining! So come along - you might be surprised at how much fun you have!

Campaigning

May Day March

UoN Labor Club Party

O Week

[email protected] facebook.com/uonlaborclub

21

Page 23: Opus November

LABORCLUB“WE WERE OUTSIDE TRADES HALL DOING THE PROTEST THING AND THE VOTE INSIDE AT THE CONVENTION WAS WON BY A COUPLE OF VOTES AND I REMEMBER THINKING IT MIGHT BE WORTHWHILE BEING IN THERE RATHER THAN OUT HERE PROTESTING.” Penny Wong, Finance Minister, talking about the introduction of HECS and why she became involved in politics.

Who is the Labor club?We are the uno�cial face of the ALP on campus - which means we are are not a�liated with the party and have a little more freedom than the rest of the ALP.

What do you guys do?We’re more of a social club than a political organsiation. Don’t get me wrong, we’re Labor supporters but we enjoy having a beverage as much as shaping policy.

So, you guys are just booze hounds?WE WISH! We have many active members who are part of Newcastle Labor and Young Labor. While we do get involved with some things, such as harassing the uni for a better deal for students, the club is mainly social.

Why would I join?It’s a fun, social, commitment free way to see if politics might be for you. We’re not dictators - you can come to a get together and see if it’s your thing. If it is, then great! If not, that’s cool, at least you’ve satis�ed your curiosity!

Remember that every politician had to start somewhere.

I don’t care about politics.Our advice? �ink of something that you’re passionate about, �nd out as much as you can about it and get involved in it. You have a right to have your voice heard - annoy those in charge until they hear you!

Does Labor have relevance in modern Australia?Labor has done a great job in securing and protecting the working rights for all people - including you.

Labor will continue to do this while moving on to other important things, like sharing the wealth around, tackling climate change and sustainability, building the NBN and looking after the most vulnerable people in Australia.

Without Labor, Australia would still be under Workchoices, ignoring climate change, running on ADSL and without an National Disability Insurance Scheme.

“I joined the ALP to make a di�erence in society, to help working people and to support

the future prosperity of our country. I am driven by the importance of equity, social justice and compassion.

�e Labor Party is the party of progress. We do not shy from tough decisions, we embrace sound public policies and �ght for what is right in the interests of the nation.

I encourage each of you to not stand on the sidelines but to embrace every opportunity that presents itself and to act on the values that motivate you. After all, you are our future.”

Greg Combet, Minister for Climate Change, talking about why he joined the ALP - for this article!

Will I get harassed to join the ALP?Nah, we’re not a cult. You don’t have to be a member to come along or to join UoN Labor Club and we wont harass you about it. You don’t have to sign up or commit to anything.

I don’t really get politics...What better place to learn? We don’t hate in the Labor Club. Most members agree that we have learned a billion times more than we used to know since joining! So come along - you might be surprised at how much fun you have!

20

Who is the Labor club?We are the uno�cial face of the ALP on campus - which means we are are not a�liated with the party and have a little more freedom than the rest of the ALP.

What do you guys do?We’re more of a social club than a political organsiation. Don’t get me wrong, we’re Labor supporters but we enjoy having a beverage as much as shaping policy.

So, you guys are just booze hounds?WE WISH! We have many active members who are part of Newcastle Labor and Young Labor. While we do get involved with some things, such as harassing the uni for a better deal for students, the club is mainly social.

Why would I join?It’s a fun, social, commitment free way to see if politics might be for you. We’re not dictators - you can come to a get together and see if it’s your thing. If it is, then great! If not, that’s cool, at least you’ve satis�ed your curiosity!

Remember that every politician had to start somewhere.

I don’t care about politics.Our advice? �ink of something that you’re passionate about, �nd out as much as you can about it and get involved in it. You have a right to have your voice heard - annoy those in charge until they hear you!

Does Labor have relevance in modern Australia?Labor has done a great job in securing and protecting the working rights for all people - including you.

Labor will continue to do this while moving on to other important things, like sharing the wealth around, tackling climate change and sustainability, building the NBN and looking after the most vulnerable people in Australia.

Without Labor, Australia would still be under Workchoices, ignoring climate change, running on ADSL and without an National Disability Insurance Scheme.

“I joined the ALP to make a di�erence in society, to help working people and to support

the future prosperity of our country. I am driven by the importance of equity, social justice and compassion.

�e Labor Party is the party of progress. We do not shy from tough decisions, we embrace sound public policies and �ght for what is right in the interests of the nation.

I encourage each of you to not stand on the sidelines but to embrace every opportunity that presents itself and to act on the values that motivate you. After all, you are our future.”

Greg Combet, Minister for Climate Change, talking about why he joined the ALP - for this article!

Will I get harassed to join the ALP?Nah, we’re not a cult. You don’t have to be a member to come along or to join UoN Labor Club and we wont harass you about it. You don’t have to sign up or commit to anything.

I don’t really get politics...What better place to learn? We don’t hate in the Labor Club. Most members agree that we have learned a billion times more than we used to know since joining! So come along - you might be surprised at how much fun you have!

Campaigning

May Day March

UoN Labor Club Party

O Week

[email protected] facebook.com/uonlaborclub

21

Page 24: Opus November

Over three decades have passed since Senator Arthus Sinodinos AO walked through the halls of University of Newcastle as a student. A lot has changed in our region in the three decades since the Senator graduated with a Bachelor of Commerce (Honours in Economics) in 1979 to enter a graduates program with the public service.

�e hunter was a vastly di�erent place three decades ago. In three decades Newcastle has been swept up in ‘royal fever’ and has been at the mercy of Mother Nature on more than one occasion. Newcastle has grown, then contracted, then grown again with the ups and downs of the coal and steel industry having an ebb and �ow e�ect on the population. �e Newcastle Knight’s won two premierships in this time, one in 1997 and another in 2001. Newcastle has been hit by up to 17% unemployment during the late 1980s and early 1990s and areas now heavily populated have been transformed from giant holes in the ground to bustling, shimmering examples of suburbia.

�e University of Newcastle has not been spared from change in the past decade and the University has been unrelenting in its search of progress. Many of the facilities that we take for granted today like the Great Hall, the Hunter building, the computer labs, the engineering centres and the multi-storey carpark were just a twinkle in a bureaucrat’s eye in 1979.

In 30 years Newcastle has grown from 200,000 citizens to over 350,000 and the University of Newcastle has grown to over 30,000 students and over 2,100 sta�. In this time Senator Sinodinos has been doing some growing as well.

Senator Sinodinos began his career with the Australian Department of Finance but quickly moved on to the Department of the Treasury where he stayed until 1987. Between 1987 and

1989 Arthur served former Prime Minister John Howard when he was Opposition Leader during the Hawke years. After Mr. Howard was replaced as leader of the Liberal Party, Arthur returned to the treasury until 1995 when John Howard successfully challenged Alexander Downer for the leadership.

From 1997 to 2006 Senator Sinodinos was Chief of Sta� to the Prime Minister of Australia, John Howard. He was a close con�dant of the Prime Minister and was regarded as one of the most powerful people in the country.

After leaving the Prime Minister, Arthur became a director with the investment bank Goldman Sachs JBWere, and became the Regional General Manager, Business & Private Banks at National Australia Bank. In 2008, he was part of a panel that mediated public input into the Defence White Paper. In March 2009, he was appointed Managing Director for Government, Education and Carbon Solutions, Institutional Banking, Business Banking Australia at the National Australia Bank.

Senator Sinodinos has served as Finance Director and President for the NSW branch of the Liberal Party and was appointed to the Australian Senate representing New South Wales on 2nd November 2011. John Howard was present when Arthur Sinodinos gave his maiden speech in the Senate.

Arthur Sinodinos was the guest of honour at a recent dinner held by the University of Newcastle Liberal Club. �e inaugural President’s Dinner was attended by students past and present and special guests, among them; Pat Farmer, Australian Ultra-Marathon Runner; the Hon. Bob Baldwin, Member for Paterson, Shadow Minister for Regional Development and Tourism; Jaimie Abbott, Liberal Candidate

LIBERALCLUBSUCCESSFUL UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE ALUMNI RETURNS TO INSPIRE STUDENTS

for the Federal seat of Newcastle; Cr. Brad Luke and the Hon. Natasha Maclaren-Jones MLC.

�e Dinner, held on 25th July at the Merewether Surfhouse was an opportunity for students and club members to mingle with high-pro�le politicians and learn from their experiences. �e gathering was treated to a rousing speech from the Senator about the Newcastle he grew up in and what he expects to be the major challenges for the Hunter in the future, as well as a humorous recap on his �rst meeting with President George Bush. �e night was a resounding success and o�ered an insight into the world of politics, economics and regional development, a point re-iterated by Club President Connie Day,

“the night was a huge success, it is great to see Newcastle supported by high-pro�le local, state and federal politicians”.

Jason Hickson, Founder of the University of Newcastle Liberal Club and President of the Hunter Cessnock Young Liberals said about the night that:

“I am honoured to have been able to present Senator Arthur Sinodinos with a lifetime membership to the club and am proud to have been a part of such a successful evening”.

�e dinner is now an annual �xture on the University of Newcastle Liberal Club’s calendar.

For anybody wanting to know more about the University of Newcastle Liberal Club please contact club secretary, Emily, by emailing [email protected].

22

Over three decades have passed since Senator Arthus Sinodinos AO walked through the halls of University of Newcastle as a student. A lot has changed in our region in the three decades since the Senator graduated with a Bachelor of Commerce (Honours in Economics) in 1979 to enter a graduates program with the public service.

�e hunter was a vastly di�erent place three decades ago. In three decades Newcastle has been swept up in ‘royal fever’ and has been at the mercy of Mother Nature on more than one occasion. Newcastle has grown, then contracted, then grown again with the ups and downs of the coal and steel industry having an ebb and �ow e�ect on the population. �e Newcastle Knight’s won two premierships in this time, one in 1997 and another in 2001. Newcastle has been hit by up to 17% unemployment during the late 1980s and early 1990s and areas now heavily populated have been transformed from giant holes in the ground to bustling, shimmering examples of suburbia.

�e University of Newcastle has not been spared from change in the past decade and the University has been unrelenting in its search of progress. Many of the facilities that we take for granted today like the Great Hall, the Hunter building, the computer labs, the engineering centres and the multi-storey carpark were just a twinkle in a bureaucrat’s eye in 1979.

In 30 years Newcastle has grown from 200,000 citizens to over 350,000 and the University of Newcastle has grown to over 30,000 students and over 2,100 sta�. In this time Senator Sinodinos has been doing some growing as well.

Senator Sinodinos began his career with the Australian Department of Finance but quickly moved on to the Department of the Treasury where he stayed until 1987. Between 1987 and

1989 Arthur served former Prime Minister John Howard when he was Opposition Leader during the Hawke years. After Mr. Howard was replaced as leader of the Liberal Party, Arthur returned to the treasury until 1995 when John Howard successfully challenged Alexander Downer for the leadership.

From 1997 to 2006 Senator Sinodinos was Chief of Sta� to the Prime Minister of Australia, John Howard. He was a close con�dant of the Prime Minister and was regarded as one of the most powerful people in the country.

After leaving the Prime Minister, Arthur became a director with the investment bank Goldman Sachs JBWere, and became the Regional General Manager, Business & Private Banks at National Australia Bank. In 2008, he was part of a panel that mediated public input into the Defence White Paper. In March 2009, he was appointed Managing Director for Government, Education and Carbon Solutions, Institutional Banking, Business Banking Australia at the National Australia Bank.

Senator Sinodinos has served as Finance Director and President for the NSW branch of the Liberal Party and was appointed to the Australian Senate representing New South Wales on 2nd November 2011. John Howard was present when Arthur Sinodinos gave his maiden speech in the Senate.

Arthur Sinodinos was the guest of honour at a recent dinner held by the University of Newcastle Liberal Club. �e inaugural President’s Dinner was attended by students past and present and special guests, among them; Pat Farmer, Australian Ultra-Marathon Runner; the Hon. Bob Baldwin, Member for Paterson, Shadow Minister for Regional Development and Tourism; Jaimie Abbott, Liberal Candidate

for the Federal seat of Newcastle; Cr. Brad Luke and the Hon. Natasha Maclaren-Jones MLC.

�e Dinner, held on 25th July at the Merewether Surfhouse was an opportunity for students and club members to mingle with high-pro�le politicians and learn from their experiences. �e gathering was treated to a rousing speech from the Senator about the Newcastle he grew up in and what he expects to be the major challenges for the Hunter in the future, as well as a humorous recap on his �rst meeting with President George Bush. �e night was a resounding success and o�ered an insight into the world of politics, economics and regional development, a point re-iterated by Club President Connie Day,

“the night was a huge success, it is great to see Newcastle supported by high-pro�le local, state and federal politicians”.

Jason Hickson, Founder of the University of Newcastle Liberal Club and President of the Hunter Cessnock Young Liberals said about the night that:

“I am honoured to have been able to present Senator Arthur Sinodinos with a lifetime membership to the club and am proud to have been a part of such a successful evening”.

�e dinner is now an annual �xture on the University of Newcastle Liberal Club’s calendar.

For anybody wanting to know more about the University of Newcastle Liberal Club please contact club secretary, Emily, by emailing [email protected].

Hunter Cessnock Young Liberal Branch Pres. Jason Hickson speaking, with Senator Arthur Sinodinos

Pres of UoNLC Connie Day, Senator Arthur Sinodinos AO, Vice Pres of UoNLC Nathan Laing

UoNLC Executive

23

Page 25: Opus November

Over three decades have passed since Senator Arthus Sinodinos AO walked through the halls of University of Newcastle as a student. A lot has changed in our region in the three decades since the Senator graduated with a Bachelor of Commerce (Honours in Economics) in 1979 to enter a graduates program with the public service.

�e hunter was a vastly di�erent place three decades ago. In three decades Newcastle has been swept up in ‘royal fever’ and has been at the mercy of Mother Nature on more than one occasion. Newcastle has grown, then contracted, then grown again with the ups and downs of the coal and steel industry having an ebb and �ow e�ect on the population. �e Newcastle Knight’s won two premierships in this time, one in 1997 and another in 2001. Newcastle has been hit by up to 17% unemployment during the late 1980s and early 1990s and areas now heavily populated have been transformed from giant holes in the ground to bustling, shimmering examples of suburbia.

�e University of Newcastle has not been spared from change in the past decade and the University has been unrelenting in its search of progress. Many of the facilities that we take for granted today like the Great Hall, the Hunter building, the computer labs, the engineering centres and the multi-storey carpark were just a twinkle in a bureaucrat’s eye in 1979.

In 30 years Newcastle has grown from 200,000 citizens to over 350,000 and the University of Newcastle has grown to over 30,000 students and over 2,100 sta�. In this time Senator Sinodinos has been doing some growing as well.

Senator Sinodinos began his career with the Australian Department of Finance but quickly moved on to the Department of the Treasury where he stayed until 1987. Between 1987 and

1989 Arthur served former Prime Minister John Howard when he was Opposition Leader during the Hawke years. After Mr. Howard was replaced as leader of the Liberal Party, Arthur returned to the treasury until 1995 when John Howard successfully challenged Alexander Downer for the leadership.

From 1997 to 2006 Senator Sinodinos was Chief of Sta� to the Prime Minister of Australia, John Howard. He was a close con�dant of the Prime Minister and was regarded as one of the most powerful people in the country.

After leaving the Prime Minister, Arthur became a director with the investment bank Goldman Sachs JBWere, and became the Regional General Manager, Business & Private Banks at National Australia Bank. In 2008, he was part of a panel that mediated public input into the Defence White Paper. In March 2009, he was appointed Managing Director for Government, Education and Carbon Solutions, Institutional Banking, Business Banking Australia at the National Australia Bank.

Senator Sinodinos has served as Finance Director and President for the NSW branch of the Liberal Party and was appointed to the Australian Senate representing New South Wales on 2nd November 2011. John Howard was present when Arthur Sinodinos gave his maiden speech in the Senate.

Arthur Sinodinos was the guest of honour at a recent dinner held by the University of Newcastle Liberal Club. �e inaugural President’s Dinner was attended by students past and present and special guests, among them; Pat Farmer, Australian Ultra-Marathon Runner; the Hon. Bob Baldwin, Member for Paterson, Shadow Minister for Regional Development and Tourism; Jaimie Abbott, Liberal Candidate

LIBERALCLUBSUCCESSFUL UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE ALUMNI RETURNS TO INSPIRE STUDENTS

for the Federal seat of Newcastle; Cr. Brad Luke and the Hon. Natasha Maclaren-Jones MLC.

�e Dinner, held on 25th July at the Merewether Surfhouse was an opportunity for students and club members to mingle with high-pro�le politicians and learn from their experiences. �e gathering was treated to a rousing speech from the Senator about the Newcastle he grew up in and what he expects to be the major challenges for the Hunter in the future, as well as a humorous recap on his �rst meeting with President George Bush. �e night was a resounding success and o�ered an insight into the world of politics, economics and regional development, a point re-iterated by Club President Connie Day,

“the night was a huge success, it is great to see Newcastle supported by high-pro�le local, state and federal politicians”.

Jason Hickson, Founder of the University of Newcastle Liberal Club and President of the Hunter Cessnock Young Liberals said about the night that:

“I am honoured to have been able to present Senator Arthur Sinodinos with a lifetime membership to the club and am proud to have been a part of such a successful evening”.

�e dinner is now an annual �xture on the University of Newcastle Liberal Club’s calendar.

For anybody wanting to know more about the University of Newcastle Liberal Club please contact club secretary, Emily, by emailing [email protected].

22

Over three decades have passed since Senator Arthus Sinodinos AO walked through the halls of University of Newcastle as a student. A lot has changed in our region in the three decades since the Senator graduated with a Bachelor of Commerce (Honours in Economics) in 1979 to enter a graduates program with the public service.

�e hunter was a vastly di�erent place three decades ago. In three decades Newcastle has been swept up in ‘royal fever’ and has been at the mercy of Mother Nature on more than one occasion. Newcastle has grown, then contracted, then grown again with the ups and downs of the coal and steel industry having an ebb and �ow e�ect on the population. �e Newcastle Knight’s won two premierships in this time, one in 1997 and another in 2001. Newcastle has been hit by up to 17% unemployment during the late 1980s and early 1990s and areas now heavily populated have been transformed from giant holes in the ground to bustling, shimmering examples of suburbia.

�e University of Newcastle has not been spared from change in the past decade and the University has been unrelenting in its search of progress. Many of the facilities that we take for granted today like the Great Hall, the Hunter building, the computer labs, the engineering centres and the multi-storey carpark were just a twinkle in a bureaucrat’s eye in 1979.

In 30 years Newcastle has grown from 200,000 citizens to over 350,000 and the University of Newcastle has grown to over 30,000 students and over 2,100 sta�. In this time Senator Sinodinos has been doing some growing as well.

Senator Sinodinos began his career with the Australian Department of Finance but quickly moved on to the Department of the Treasury where he stayed until 1987. Between 1987 and

1989 Arthur served former Prime Minister John Howard when he was Opposition Leader during the Hawke years. After Mr. Howard was replaced as leader of the Liberal Party, Arthur returned to the treasury until 1995 when John Howard successfully challenged Alexander Downer for the leadership.

From 1997 to 2006 Senator Sinodinos was Chief of Sta� to the Prime Minister of Australia, John Howard. He was a close con�dant of the Prime Minister and was regarded as one of the most powerful people in the country.

After leaving the Prime Minister, Arthur became a director with the investment bank Goldman Sachs JBWere, and became the Regional General Manager, Business & Private Banks at National Australia Bank. In 2008, he was part of a panel that mediated public input into the Defence White Paper. In March 2009, he was appointed Managing Director for Government, Education and Carbon Solutions, Institutional Banking, Business Banking Australia at the National Australia Bank.

Senator Sinodinos has served as Finance Director and President for the NSW branch of the Liberal Party and was appointed to the Australian Senate representing New South Wales on 2nd November 2011. John Howard was present when Arthur Sinodinos gave his maiden speech in the Senate.

Arthur Sinodinos was the guest of honour at a recent dinner held by the University of Newcastle Liberal Club. �e inaugural President’s Dinner was attended by students past and present and special guests, among them; Pat Farmer, Australian Ultra-Marathon Runner; the Hon. Bob Baldwin, Member for Paterson, Shadow Minister for Regional Development and Tourism; Jaimie Abbott, Liberal Candidate

for the Federal seat of Newcastle; Cr. Brad Luke and the Hon. Natasha Maclaren-Jones MLC.

�e Dinner, held on 25th July at the Merewether Surfhouse was an opportunity for students and club members to mingle with high-pro�le politicians and learn from their experiences. �e gathering was treated to a rousing speech from the Senator about the Newcastle he grew up in and what he expects to be the major challenges for the Hunter in the future, as well as a humorous recap on his �rst meeting with President George Bush. �e night was a resounding success and o�ered an insight into the world of politics, economics and regional development, a point re-iterated by Club President Connie Day,

“the night was a huge success, it is great to see Newcastle supported by high-pro�le local, state and federal politicians”.

Jason Hickson, Founder of the University of Newcastle Liberal Club and President of the Hunter Cessnock Young Liberals said about the night that:

“I am honoured to have been able to present Senator Arthur Sinodinos with a lifetime membership to the club and am proud to have been a part of such a successful evening”.

�e dinner is now an annual �xture on the University of Newcastle Liberal Club’s calendar.

For anybody wanting to know more about the University of Newcastle Liberal Club please contact club secretary, Emily, by emailing [email protected].

Hunter Cessnock Young Liberal Branch Pres. Jason Hickson speaking, with Senator Arthur Sinodinos

Pres of UoNLC Connie Day, Senator Arthur Sinodinos AO, Vice Pres of UoNLC Nathan Laing

UoNLC Executive

23

Page 26: Opus November

Noise.O� the back of their new album Company Bluejuice has just completed their Winter of our Discotech Tour of 15 shows in 18 days. They opened their tour at our very own Bar on the Hill and certainly showed everyone there a good time. Their infectious energy raised the roof and shook the ground that Wednesday night as they took to the stage with Deep Sea Arcade in what was one of the most energetically positive and footloose crowds at the Bar on the Hill this year! (yes that is including Hilltop). Shortly before their gig I sat down with Jake from the band to have a chin wag & below is but some of the highlights of our chat… KL- It’s been �ve years since you guys released your �rst album, how are you getting pumped for your Winter of our Discotech tour? Aside from standing in your backyard looking at the sun.

J- That’s probably all I’ll do, I mean we’ll rehearse, that’ll be a good. But other than that yeah nothing out of the ordinary, we’ll just slide right into it… it’s been weird, we never knew what this band would be in the process of starting it 11 years ago. So we just did and that is what happened. I cannot stress enough there was no conscious thought in the development of this band until two years ago. I don’t think anyway, there was this kind of vague philosophy that we wanted to be entertaining live, we knew that we could do it and that there weren’t many bands around that were doing that kind of there. There was a lot of good songs, a lot of good style going around which is all good and saleable on it’s own right, but there wasn’t an act that was bursting o� the stage physically trying to get your attention and we wanted to do it for no apparent reason.

KL- What prompted this decision to make an e�ort in the direction of the band?

J- We think about it all now cause we’re adults. Initially it just happens and then you’re planning for the next thing and that just happens, luckily your song goes to radio… But now the band has been around for quite a while now, some of us have had kids, it’s not the same thing that it was at the very start so you plan it a little more. I doesn’t mean that it is not satisfying but I’d like it to be organised…I’d prefer it where it’s sitting now in regards to writing and doing things slightly more professionally… rather than the crazy aspiration of the start of the band, because the creative produce wasn’t as good at the start of the band.

KL- So how has this direction taking shape in your new album (Company)?

J- Basically we �nished Head of the Hawk and were dissatis�ed with what we’d done, in terms of getting a good quality of songs together and I knew we had at least one good sucker punch on the record with Broken Leg and another couple of radio worthy songs that would work. But overall it was di�cult because we weren’t studio skilled people. We were relying on a

producer as well to shape what the record would sound like which is not something I wouldn’t do again, but just something I wouldn’t of done at that age… it’s a bit of a catch 22 because you need it cause you don’t have the skills but you want to sounds di�erent but you can’t e�ect it cause you have a producer there and they are doing that job, nine times out of ten you’re not editing… So I felt we just needed to move in that direction to make a record that we’re all happy with. That was really the main thing, the production thing was more by the by… When Head of the Hawk came out we were happy it went to radio but not feeling like we owned our craft and I feel we as a band needed to own our craft and Company is that album for us.

And owning their craft is certainly what Bluejuice do with their new album Company. Yes, it smells of an 80’s tribute album but, like The Galvatrons, before them Bluejuice infuse what could be clichéd shit with energy and a mature sense of irony as they play through their twelve track ode to partying on. Highlights for me have to be the homophonic Cheap Drinks that leaves you bouncing around like a 3 year old with the Barney theme stuck in their head (if you don’t get that reference get your arse back to high school), the funk-dripping I’ll Put You On that just oozes that early 80’s Miami sexxxxxxx & Act Yr Age for obvious reasons. Sure there are a couple of slow points in the album, most notably Aspen, New York, but they are well placed in the album to allow you to regain some composure as you pass by the speed camera and need to slow down.

Bluejuice have done something other Aussie acts haven’t done when they found success in a particular sound; they haven’t just started repeating the sound over and over ( Yes I am looking at you AC/DC & Killing Heidi) nor have

they run away and shunned the music they made them house hold names ( This mean you Eskimo Joe, just put on that Sweater once in a while!). Bluejuice have taken the sounds, the energy and the vibe (maybe the serenity too) of their stand out tracks Vitriol & Broken Leg, and developed, synthesised even, them into their own trademark sound that is varied but still holds their signature and meaning. When talking to Jake he said before this album the band had no direction in their development & this is them taking a little direction in planning it all out. All I can say to that is if this is what happens when they put a little e�ort in for direction… what they could do if they locked themselves away and gave it their all would be unforgettable.

Rating: 4.3/5Hipster appeal: hipsters will like if they are drunk & acknowledge their existence but wont praise because they just aren’t obscure enough.GREAT LISTENING IF: you’re going on a long drive or if you’re having a tender moment with something special in the shower…

Bluejuice

24

O� the back of their new album Company Bluejuice has just completed their Winter of our Discotech Tour of 15 shows in 18 days. They opened their tour at our very own Bar on the Hill and certainly showed everyone there a good time. Their infectious energy raised the roof and shook the ground that Wednesday night as they took to the stage with Deep Sea Arcade in what was one of the most energetically positive and footloose crowds at the Bar on the Hill this year! (yes that is including Hilltop). Shortly before their gig I sat down with Jake from the band to have a chin wag & below is but some of the highlights of our chat… KL- It’s been �ve years since you guys released your �rst album, how are you getting pumped for your Winter of our Discotech tour? Aside from standing in your backyard looking at the sun.

J- That’s probably all I’ll do, I mean we’ll rehearse, that’ll be a good. But other than that yeah nothing out of the ordinary, we’ll just slide right into it… it’s been weird, we never knew what this band would be in the process of starting it 11 years ago. So we just did and that is what happened. I cannot stress enough there was no conscious thought in the development of this band until two years ago. I don’t think anyway, there was this kind of vague philosophy that we wanted to be entertaining live, we knew that we could do it and that there weren’t many bands around that were doing that kind of there. There was a lot of good songs, a lot of good style going around which is all good and saleable on it’s own right, but there wasn’t an act that was bursting o� the stage physically trying to get your attention and we wanted to do it for no apparent reason.

KL- What prompted this decision to make an e�ort in the direction of the band?

Opus’ music pages with your local music liking person, Kuuluvan Laitoksen

J- We think about it all now cause we’re adults. Initially it just happens and then you’re planning for the next thing and that just happens, luckily your song goes to radio… But now the band has been around for quite a while now, some of us have had kids, it’s not the same thing that it was at the very start so you plan it a little more. I doesn’t mean that it is not satisfying but I’d like it to be organised…I’d prefer it where it’s sitting now in regards to writing and doing things slightly more professionally… rather than the crazy aspiration of the start of the band, because the creative produce wasn’t as good at the start of the band.

KL- So how has this direction taking shape in your new album (Company)?

J- Basically we �nished Head of the Hawk and were dissatis�ed with what we’d done, in terms of getting a good quality of songs together and I knew we had at least one good sucker punch on the record with Broken Leg and another couple of radio worthy songs that would work. But overall it was di�cult because we weren’t studio skilled people. We were relying on a

producer as well to shape what the record would sound like which is not something I wouldn’t do again, but just something I wouldn’t of done at that age… it’s a bit of a catch 22 because you need it cause you don’t have the skills but you want to sounds di�erent but you can’t e�ect it cause you have a producer there and they are doing that job, nine times out of ten you’re not editing… So I felt we just needed to move in that direction to make a record that we’re all happy with. That was really the main thing, the production thing was more by the by… When Head of the Hawk came out we were happy it went to radio but not feeling like we owned our craft and I feel we as a band needed to own our craft and Company is that album for us.

And owning their craft is certainly what Bluejuice do with their new album Company. Yes, it smells of an 80’s tribute album but, like The Galvatrons, before them Bluejuice infuse what could be clichéd shit with energy and a mature sense of irony as they play through their twelve track ode to partying on. Highlights for me have to be the homophonic Cheap Drinks that leaves you bouncing around like a 3 year old with the Barney theme stuck in their head (if you don’t get that reference get your arse back to high school), the funk-dripping I’ll Put You On that just oozes that early 80’s Miami sexxxxxxx & Act Yr Age for obvious reasons. Sure there are a couple of slow points in the album, most notably Aspen, New York, but they are well placed in the album to allow you to regain some composure as you pass by the speed camera and need to slow down.

Bluejuice have done something other Aussie acts haven’t done when they found success in a particular sound; they haven’t just started repeating the sound over and over ( Yes I am looking at you AC/DC & Killing Heidi) nor have

they run away and shunned the music they made them house hold names ( This mean you Eskimo Joe, just put on that Sweater once in a while!). Bluejuice have taken the sounds, the energy and the vibe (maybe the serenity too) of their stand out tracks Vitriol & Broken Leg, and developed, synthesised even, them into their own trademark sound that is varied but still holds their signature and meaning. When talking to Jake he said before this album the band had no direction in their development & this is them taking a little direction in planning it all out. All I can say to that is if this is what happens when they put a little e�ort in for direction… what they could do if they locked themselves away and gave it their all would be unforgettable.

Rating: 4.3/5Hipster appeal: hipsters will like if they are drunk & acknowledge their existence but wont praise because they just aren’t obscure enough.GREAT LISTENING IF: you’re going on a long drive or if you’re having a tender moment with something special in the shower…

25

Page 27: Opus November

Noise.O� the back of their new album Company Bluejuice has just completed their Winter of our Discotech Tour of 15 shows in 18 days. They opened their tour at our very own Bar on the Hill and certainly showed everyone there a good time. Their infectious energy raised the roof and shook the ground that Wednesday night as they took to the stage with Deep Sea Arcade in what was one of the most energetically positive and footloose crowds at the Bar on the Hill this year! (yes that is including Hilltop). Shortly before their gig I sat down with Jake from the band to have a chin wag & below is but some of the highlights of our chat… KL- It’s been �ve years since you guys released your �rst album, how are you getting pumped for your Winter of our Discotech tour? Aside from standing in your backyard looking at the sun.

J- That’s probably all I’ll do, I mean we’ll rehearse, that’ll be a good. But other than that yeah nothing out of the ordinary, we’ll just slide right into it… it’s been weird, we never knew what this band would be in the process of starting it 11 years ago. So we just did and that is what happened. I cannot stress enough there was no conscious thought in the development of this band until two years ago. I don’t think anyway, there was this kind of vague philosophy that we wanted to be entertaining live, we knew that we could do it and that there weren’t many bands around that were doing that kind of there. There was a lot of good songs, a lot of good style going around which is all good and saleable on it’s own right, but there wasn’t an act that was bursting o� the stage physically trying to get your attention and we wanted to do it for no apparent reason.

KL- What prompted this decision to make an e�ort in the direction of the band?

J- We think about it all now cause we’re adults. Initially it just happens and then you’re planning for the next thing and that just happens, luckily your song goes to radio… But now the band has been around for quite a while now, some of us have had kids, it’s not the same thing that it was at the very start so you plan it a little more. I doesn’t mean that it is not satisfying but I’d like it to be organised…I’d prefer it where it’s sitting now in regards to writing and doing things slightly more professionally… rather than the crazy aspiration of the start of the band, because the creative produce wasn’t as good at the start of the band.

KL- So how has this direction taking shape in your new album (Company)?

J- Basically we �nished Head of the Hawk and were dissatis�ed with what we’d done, in terms of getting a good quality of songs together and I knew we had at least one good sucker punch on the record with Broken Leg and another couple of radio worthy songs that would work. But overall it was di�cult because we weren’t studio skilled people. We were relying on a

producer as well to shape what the record would sound like which is not something I wouldn’t do again, but just something I wouldn’t of done at that age… it’s a bit of a catch 22 because you need it cause you don’t have the skills but you want to sounds di�erent but you can’t e�ect it cause you have a producer there and they are doing that job, nine times out of ten you’re not editing… So I felt we just needed to move in that direction to make a record that we’re all happy with. That was really the main thing, the production thing was more by the by… When Head of the Hawk came out we were happy it went to radio but not feeling like we owned our craft and I feel we as a band needed to own our craft and Company is that album for us.

And owning their craft is certainly what Bluejuice do with their new album Company. Yes, it smells of an 80’s tribute album but, like The Galvatrons, before them Bluejuice infuse what could be clichéd shit with energy and a mature sense of irony as they play through their twelve track ode to partying on. Highlights for me have to be the homophonic Cheap Drinks that leaves you bouncing around like a 3 year old with the Barney theme stuck in their head (if you don’t get that reference get your arse back to high school), the funk-dripping I’ll Put You On that just oozes that early 80’s Miami sexxxxxxx & Act Yr Age for obvious reasons. Sure there are a couple of slow points in the album, most notably Aspen, New York, but they are well placed in the album to allow you to regain some composure as you pass by the speed camera and need to slow down.

Bluejuice have done something other Aussie acts haven’t done when they found success in a particular sound; they haven’t just started repeating the sound over and over ( Yes I am looking at you AC/DC & Killing Heidi) nor have

they run away and shunned the music they made them house hold names ( This mean you Eskimo Joe, just put on that Sweater once in a while!). Bluejuice have taken the sounds, the energy and the vibe (maybe the serenity too) of their stand out tracks Vitriol & Broken Leg, and developed, synthesised even, them into their own trademark sound that is varied but still holds their signature and meaning. When talking to Jake he said before this album the band had no direction in their development & this is them taking a little direction in planning it all out. All I can say to that is if this is what happens when they put a little e�ort in for direction… what they could do if they locked themselves away and gave it their all would be unforgettable.

Rating: 4.3/5Hipster appeal: hipsters will like if they are drunk & acknowledge their existence but wont praise because they just aren’t obscure enough.GREAT LISTENING IF: you’re going on a long drive or if you’re having a tender moment with something special in the shower…

Bluejuice

24

O� the back of their new album Company Bluejuice has just completed their Winter of our Discotech Tour of 15 shows in 18 days. They opened their tour at our very own Bar on the Hill and certainly showed everyone there a good time. Their infectious energy raised the roof and shook the ground that Wednesday night as they took to the stage with Deep Sea Arcade in what was one of the most energetically positive and footloose crowds at the Bar on the Hill this year! (yes that is including Hilltop). Shortly before their gig I sat down with Jake from the band to have a chin wag & below is but some of the highlights of our chat… KL- It’s been �ve years since you guys released your �rst album, how are you getting pumped for your Winter of our Discotech tour? Aside from standing in your backyard looking at the sun.

J- That’s probably all I’ll do, I mean we’ll rehearse, that’ll be a good. But other than that yeah nothing out of the ordinary, we’ll just slide right into it… it’s been weird, we never knew what this band would be in the process of starting it 11 years ago. So we just did and that is what happened. I cannot stress enough there was no conscious thought in the development of this band until two years ago. I don’t think anyway, there was this kind of vague philosophy that we wanted to be entertaining live, we knew that we could do it and that there weren’t many bands around that were doing that kind of there. There was a lot of good songs, a lot of good style going around which is all good and saleable on it’s own right, but there wasn’t an act that was bursting o� the stage physically trying to get your attention and we wanted to do it for no apparent reason.

KL- What prompted this decision to make an e�ort in the direction of the band?

Opus’ music pages with your local music liking person, Kuuluvan Laitoksen

J- We think about it all now cause we’re adults. Initially it just happens and then you’re planning for the next thing and that just happens, luckily your song goes to radio… But now the band has been around for quite a while now, some of us have had kids, it’s not the same thing that it was at the very start so you plan it a little more. I doesn’t mean that it is not satisfying but I’d like it to be organised…I’d prefer it where it’s sitting now in regards to writing and doing things slightly more professionally… rather than the crazy aspiration of the start of the band, because the creative produce wasn’t as good at the start of the band.

KL- So how has this direction taking shape in your new album (Company)?

J- Basically we �nished Head of the Hawk and were dissatis�ed with what we’d done, in terms of getting a good quality of songs together and I knew we had at least one good sucker punch on the record with Broken Leg and another couple of radio worthy songs that would work. But overall it was di�cult because we weren’t studio skilled people. We were relying on a

producer as well to shape what the record would sound like which is not something I wouldn’t do again, but just something I wouldn’t of done at that age… it’s a bit of a catch 22 because you need it cause you don’t have the skills but you want to sounds di�erent but you can’t e�ect it cause you have a producer there and they are doing that job, nine times out of ten you’re not editing… So I felt we just needed to move in that direction to make a record that we’re all happy with. That was really the main thing, the production thing was more by the by… When Head of the Hawk came out we were happy it went to radio but not feeling like we owned our craft and I feel we as a band needed to own our craft and Company is that album for us.

And owning their craft is certainly what Bluejuice do with their new album Company. Yes, it smells of an 80’s tribute album but, like The Galvatrons, before them Bluejuice infuse what could be clichéd shit with energy and a mature sense of irony as they play through their twelve track ode to partying on. Highlights for me have to be the homophonic Cheap Drinks that leaves you bouncing around like a 3 year old with the Barney theme stuck in their head (if you don’t get that reference get your arse back to high school), the funk-dripping I’ll Put You On that just oozes that early 80’s Miami sexxxxxxx & Act Yr Age for obvious reasons. Sure there are a couple of slow points in the album, most notably Aspen, New York, but they are well placed in the album to allow you to regain some composure as you pass by the speed camera and need to slow down.

Bluejuice have done something other Aussie acts haven’t done when they found success in a particular sound; they haven’t just started repeating the sound over and over ( Yes I am looking at you AC/DC & Killing Heidi) nor have

they run away and shunned the music they made them house hold names ( This mean you Eskimo Joe, just put on that Sweater once in a while!). Bluejuice have taken the sounds, the energy and the vibe (maybe the serenity too) of their stand out tracks Vitriol & Broken Leg, and developed, synthesised even, them into their own trademark sound that is varied but still holds their signature and meaning. When talking to Jake he said before this album the band had no direction in their development & this is them taking a little direction in planning it all out. All I can say to that is if this is what happens when they put a little e�ort in for direction… what they could do if they locked themselves away and gave it their all would be unforgettable.

Rating: 4.3/5Hipster appeal: hipsters will like if they are drunk & acknowledge their existence but wont praise because they just aren’t obscure enough.GREAT LISTENING IF: you’re going on a long drive or if you’re having a tender moment with something special in the shower…

25

Page 28: Opus November

NEW SUPPORT INITIATIVE FOR STUDENTSEveryone experiences stress in some form at various times in their life.

Whilst not all stress is bad, if it reduces sleep and other normal functioning through anxiety, low mood etc, it can be helpful to ask for support.

�e University of Newcastle Health Service is one avenue on campus to support students at these times.

A recently introduced careinfoline is another. �e careinfoline o�ers students information and guidance to point them in the direction of the most appropriate form of support – whether that be Counselling, chaplaincy, or medical. �rough the careinfoline, students can be directed to websites that o�er help, if they prefer that option rather than talking face to face with someone.

�e number for the careinfoline is 49 17938. An experienced clinician answers the line, and will provide options to callers to match the particular challenge they are facing.

�is service will be promoted widely throughout the University over the next few months, on digital monitors, Lecture theatre screens, student sites etc , especially during October - Mental Health Month.

MENTAL HEALTH ADVISOR APPOINTED TO HEALTH SERVICES PROJECT�e University Health Service received funding in April this year to run a pilot program o�ering extra support for student mental health and well- being. �e Project is designed to promote and enhance early intervention and support for students who are stressed, and to assist them continue with their studies.

COUNSELLING SERVICEUPDATES

�e support is provided by a careinfoline that will take calls from students who are needing help, and a counsellor, who can provide speci�c assistance and direction.

�e careinfoline is answered by a clinician who will talk to students about their issue and guide them to an appropriate support option.

�e clinician is the Mental Health Advisor for the project, Jenelle Langham

NUSA has been invited to contribute to the project by appointment to the Mental Health Advisory group that was set up, and also in personal meetings with Jenelle, the Mental Health Advisor. Jenelle has over 40 years experience in mental health, as a nurse, and as an educator.

Jenelle was one of the few nurses with a tertiary degree back in the mid 1980’s when nursing became a fully professional tertiary programme. She taught in undergraduate studies for 9 years, and co-ordinated the �rst post-graduate mental health nursing course at QUT in Brisbane. In the past decade, Jenelle has returned to clinical work, most recently on the Acute team with Hunter Valley Mental Health service.

Jenelle understands the pressures faced by students, having completed her Bachelor of Arts whilst working as a tutor in South Australia, and then her honours and Master’s degree whilst a lecturer, with a family of three children in �e University of Newcastle.

“I know what it is like trying to be ‘superwoman’ –run a relationship, a family, studies, and work all at the same time” said Jenelle .

“Hopefully, students will realise that it is a strength, to ask for help when struggling, not a failing”

Page 29: Opus November

NEW SUPPORT INITIATIVE FOR STUDENTSEveryone experiences stress in some form at various times in their life.

Whilst not all stress is bad, if it reduces sleep and other normal functioning through anxiety, low mood etc, it can be helpful to ask for support.

�e University of Newcastle Health Service is one avenue on campus to support students at these times.

A recently introduced careinfoline is another. �e careinfoline o�ers students information and guidance to point them in the direction of the most appropriate form of support – whether that be Counselling, chaplaincy, or medical. �rough the careinfoline, students can be directed to websites that o�er help, if they prefer that option rather than talking face to face with someone.

�e number for the careinfoline is 49 17938. An experienced clinician answers the line, and will provide options to callers to match the particular challenge they are facing.

�is service will be promoted widely throughout the University over the next few months, on digital monitors, Lecture theatre screens, student sites etc , especially during October - Mental Health Month.

MENTAL HEALTH ADVISOR APPOINTED TO HEALTH SERVICES PROJECT�e University Health Service received funding in April this year to run a pilot program o�ering extra support for student mental health and well- being. �e Project is designed to promote and enhance early intervention and support for students who are stressed, and to assist them continue with their studies.

�e support is provided by a careinfoline that will take calls from students who are needing help, and a counsellor, who can provide speci�c assistance and direction.

�e careinfoline is answered by a clinician who will talk to students about their issue and guide them to an appropriate support option.

�e clinician is the Mental Health Advisor for the project, Jenelle Langham

NUSA has been invited to contribute to the project by appointment to the Mental Health Advisory group that was set up, and also in personal meetings with Jenelle, the Mental Health Advisor. Jenelle has over 40 years experience in mental health, as a nurse, and as an educator.

Jenelle was one of the few nurses with a tertiary degree back in the mid 1980’s when nursing became a fully professional tertiary programme. She taught in undergraduate studies for 9 years, and co-ordinated the �rst post-graduate mental health nursing course at QUT in Brisbane. In the past decade, Jenelle has returned to clinical work, most recently on the Acute team with Hunter Valley Mental Health service.

Jenelle understands the pressures faced by students, having completed her Bachelor of Arts whilst working as a tutor in South Australia, and then her honours and Master’s degree whilst a lecturer, with a family of three children in �e University of Newcastle.

“I know what it is like trying to be ‘superwoman’ –run a relationship, a family, studies, and work all at the same time” said Jenelle .

“Hopefully, students will realise that it is a strength, to ask for help when struggling, not a failing”

Adult x10 $27.60 ea

Concession x10 $13.75 ea

Now selling bus tickets.

Page 30: Opus November

‘All rise for Judge Keans’ called the court o�cer.Judge Keans settled himself down in his high-backed chair. ‘Case is Kingston vs Kingston’ announced the o�cer. ‘So Mr Kingston,’ Judge Keans began as he reviewed his notes, ‘You have been injured in Mr Kingston’s martial arts class and are suing for medical costs, is that right?’�e plainti� sat in a wheelchair, with his arm bandaged and in a sling. ‘�at’s right Mr Judge,’ began the injured man in a strange half-english accent that Keans struggled to place, ‘during his class I performed an exercise as he instructed and ended up injuring meself. He should have to pay for me injuries as it’s his fault I’m like this,’ he said indicating his wheelchair and sling. ‘You will call me Your Honour when addressing me Mr Kingston. If you are quite done, I’d like to hear from the defence.’ ‘�at’s me for now, Mr Honour, sir,” replied the plainti�. Upon saying this he climbed out of his wheelchair and crossed to the other side of the court. ‘Mr Kingston, what exactly are you doing out of your wheelchair?’ asked the judge. ‘Well I only did the wheelchair thing for the sympathy vote. Me lawyer’s idea. Clever ain’t it?’ came the answer. ‘Clever, what are you-‘ ‘You said you wanted to talk to the defendant?’ Kingston said in a broad Australian accent. He looked up at the judge as he reached the reached the desk of the defence. ‘Here I am, Your Honour.’ ‘You are the defendant? What is the meaning of this?’ ‘I am being sued unfairly Your Honour. A man should stand up for his right.’ ‘But this is absolutely ridiculous,’ cried Keans. ‘I know. It’s a martial arts gym, someone’s bound to get hurt. Anyone with common sense should realise that when they join.’ ‘How did this get to my court? Who handled this case before now? Where on earth did you �nd lawyers to argue such insanity?’ spluttered the judge incredulously, his face beginning to turn red. ‘Well’, came the half-english reply, ‘I did have to shop around a bit, but this bloke was willing to have a go.’ Mr Kingston pointed across the room at a man behind the accuser’s desk. �e young man stood up and scratched the three day stubble on his chin. ‘�e name’s Bailey Sir and I just �gured it’s never been done, and maybe I could get my name out if I set a precedent in this kind of thing.’ ‘Get your name out? Set a precedent? You think it likely that this could start happening more and more? You’re mad, and you don’t even look like a lawyer. For god’s sake man, tuck your shirt in at least’, yelled Keans, working himself into a frenzy, ‘and dare I ask where you found a lawyer for the defence?’

‘I didn’t look Your Honour, I decided to represent myself. Save on fees. Open and shut case like this, I �gured I could handle it myself. What do you think so far?’ ‘�is is a court case, the judge doesn’t hand out advice. I’ve had about enough of this, I’m putting an end to it all. Get out of my courtroom. Get out n-‘ ‘Objection’, shouted Kingston, ‘you’ve not given us a verdict yet.’ ‘Objection? You can’t object over the judge’, Keans screamed, his face crimson with outrage, ‘I will have order!’ ‘Wait’ said Bailey, standing up suddenly, ‘can I join that order, I haven’t eaten today.’ Before Keans had a chance to process this Kingston began again, scurrying back over to the desk of the plainti�. ‘I’d just like to say that there is nothing ‘open and shut’ about all this. I never signed an indemnity form so I’m well within me rights.’ ‘Indemnity form?’ asked the judge. ‘Ah yes’, said Kingston, striding back to the defence, ‘it’s standard practice to have everyone sign an indemnity form in case something happens. I had not thought it necessary in this case.’ ‘Of course’, piped the court o�cer, ‘that would just be strange now, wouldn’t it?’ ‘Mr Mills, you will be quiet in my courtroom,’ roared Keans, ‘they don’t need any help.’ Crossing over to the plainti� desk Kingston leant down to Bailey. ‘Look at him now; shouting at people, ordering us around, who does he think he is?’Keans glared at Kingston, and using every ounce of self-control he stared to speak in a calm voice, albeit it through tightly clenched teeth. ‘Mr Kingston, it occurs to me that giving you a verdict is likely the easiest way of getting rid of you. I �nd the defence guilty of neglect in the aforementioned training session. Mr Kingston I rule that not only will you have to pay for medical treatment, but you will pay the court costs of both parties. Now get out of my courtroom.’ ‘Well thank you Mr Bailey,’ said Kingston as they excited the room, ‘we won and you’re gunna be playing in the big leagues after people hear about this.’ ‘Wow, the big leagues. But I don’t know if I’m ready for that.’ ‘Take it from me’, said Kingston, ‘I may have lost, but there’s no shame in losing to the best. In fact, I’m thinking about appealing the judge’s decision, need another case?’ ‘I’d be honoured to represent both of you.’

THE WAY IT’S HEADING...DAVID KENNEDY

28

‘All rise for Judge Keans’ called the court o�cer.Judge Keans settled himself down in his high-backed chair. ‘Case is Kingston vs Kingston’ announced the o�cer. ‘So Mr Kingston,’ Judge Keans began as he reviewed his notes, ‘You have been injured in Mr Kingston’s martial arts class and are suing for medical costs, is that right?’�e plainti� sat in a wheelchair, with his arm bandaged and in a sling. ‘�at’s right Mr Judge,’ began the injured man in a strange half-english accent that Keans struggled to place, ‘during his class I performed an exercise as he instructed and ended up injuring meself. He should have to pay for me injuries as it’s his fault I’m like this,’ he said indicating his wheelchair and sling. ‘You will call me Your Honour when addressing me Mr Kingston. If you are quite done, I’d like to hear from the defence.’ ‘�at’s me for now, Mr Honour, sir,” replied the plainti�. Upon saying this he climbed out of his wheelchair and crossed to the other side of the court. ‘Mr Kingston, what exactly are you doing out of your wheelchair?’ asked the judge. ‘Well I only did the wheelchair thing for the sympathy vote. Me lawyer’s idea. Clever ain’t it?’ came the answer. ‘Clever, what are you-‘ ‘You said you wanted to talk to the defendant?’ Kingston said in a broad Australian accent. He looked up at the judge as he reached the reached the desk of the defence. ‘Here I am, Your Honour.’ ‘You are the defendant? What is the meaning of this?’ ‘I am being sued unfairly Your Honour. A man should stand up for his right.’ ‘But this is absolutely ridiculous,’ cried Keans. ‘I know. It’s a martial arts gym, someone’s bound to get hurt. Anyone with common sense should realise that when they join.’ ‘How did this get to my court? Who handled this case before now? Where on earth did you �nd lawyers to argue such insanity?’ spluttered the judge incredulously, his face beginning to turn red. ‘Well’, came the half-english reply, ‘I did have to shop around a bit, but this bloke was willing to have a go.’ Mr Kingston pointed across the room at a man behind the accuser’s desk. �e young man stood up and scratched the three day stubble on his chin. ‘�e name’s Bailey Sir and I just �gured it’s never been done, and maybe I could get my name out if I set a precedent in this kind of thing.’ ‘Get your name out? Set a precedent? You think it likely that this could start happening more and more? You’re mad, and you don’t even look like a lawyer. For god’s sake man, tuck your shirt in at least’, yelled Keans, working himself into a frenzy, ‘and dare I ask where you found a lawyer for the defence?’

‘I didn’t look Your Honour, I decided to represent myself. Save on fees. Open and shut case like this, I �gured I could handle it myself. What do you think so far?’ ‘�is is a court case, the judge doesn’t hand out advice. I’ve had about enough of this, I’m putting an end to it all. Get out of my courtroom. Get out n-‘ ‘Objection’, shouted Kingston, ‘you’ve not given us a verdict yet.’ ‘Objection? You can’t object over the judge’, Keans screamed, his face crimson with outrage, ‘I will have order!’ ‘Wait’ said Bailey, standing up suddenly, ‘can I join that order, I haven’t eaten today.’ Before Keans had a chance to process this Kingston began again, scurrying back over to the desk of the plainti�. ‘I’d just like to say that there is nothing ‘open and shut’ about all this. I never signed an indemnity form so I’m well within me rights.’ ‘Indemnity form?’ asked the judge. ‘Ah yes’, said Kingston, striding back to the defence, ‘it’s standard practice to have everyone sign an indemnity form in case something happens. I had not thought it necessary in this case.’ ‘Of course’, piped the court o�cer, ‘that would just be strange now, wouldn’t it?’ ‘Mr Mills, you will be quiet in my courtroom,’ roared Keans, ‘they don’t need any help.’ Crossing over to the plainti� desk Kingston leant down to Bailey. ‘Look at him now; shouting at people, ordering us around, who does he think he is?’Keans glared at Kingston, and using every ounce of self-control he stared to speak in a calm voice, albeit it through tightly clenched teeth. ‘Mr Kingston, it occurs to me that giving you a verdict is likely the easiest way of getting rid of you. I �nd the defence guilty of neglect in the aforementioned training session. Mr Kingston I rule that not only will you have to pay for medical treatment, but you will pay the court costs of both parties. Now get out of my courtroom.’ ‘Well thank you Mr Bailey,’ said Kingston as they excited the room, ‘we won and you’re gunna be playing in the big leagues after people hear about this.’ ‘Wow, the big leagues. But I don’t know if I’m ready for that.’ ‘Take it from me’, said Kingston, ‘I may have lost, but there’s no shame in losing to the best. In fact, I’m thinking about appealing the judge’s decision, need another case?’ ‘I’d be honoured to represent both of you.’

29

Page 31: Opus November

‘All rise for Judge Keans’ called the court o�cer.Judge Keans settled himself down in his high-backed chair. ‘Case is Kingston vs Kingston’ announced the o�cer. ‘So Mr Kingston,’ Judge Keans began as he reviewed his notes, ‘You have been injured in Mr Kingston’s martial arts class and are suing for medical costs, is that right?’�e plainti� sat in a wheelchair, with his arm bandaged and in a sling. ‘�at’s right Mr Judge,’ began the injured man in a strange half-english accent that Keans struggled to place, ‘during his class I performed an exercise as he instructed and ended up injuring meself. He should have to pay for me injuries as it’s his fault I’m like this,’ he said indicating his wheelchair and sling. ‘You will call me Your Honour when addressing me Mr Kingston. If you are quite done, I’d like to hear from the defence.’ ‘�at’s me for now, Mr Honour, sir,” replied the plainti�. Upon saying this he climbed out of his wheelchair and crossed to the other side of the court. ‘Mr Kingston, what exactly are you doing out of your wheelchair?’ asked the judge. ‘Well I only did the wheelchair thing for the sympathy vote. Me lawyer’s idea. Clever ain’t it?’ came the answer. ‘Clever, what are you-‘ ‘You said you wanted to talk to the defendant?’ Kingston said in a broad Australian accent. He looked up at the judge as he reached the reached the desk of the defence. ‘Here I am, Your Honour.’ ‘You are the defendant? What is the meaning of this?’ ‘I am being sued unfairly Your Honour. A man should stand up for his right.’ ‘But this is absolutely ridiculous,’ cried Keans. ‘I know. It’s a martial arts gym, someone’s bound to get hurt. Anyone with common sense should realise that when they join.’ ‘How did this get to my court? Who handled this case before now? Where on earth did you �nd lawyers to argue such insanity?’ spluttered the judge incredulously, his face beginning to turn red. ‘Well’, came the half-english reply, ‘I did have to shop around a bit, but this bloke was willing to have a go.’ Mr Kingston pointed across the room at a man behind the accuser’s desk. �e young man stood up and scratched the three day stubble on his chin. ‘�e name’s Bailey Sir and I just �gured it’s never been done, and maybe I could get my name out if I set a precedent in this kind of thing.’ ‘Get your name out? Set a precedent? You think it likely that this could start happening more and more? You’re mad, and you don’t even look like a lawyer. For god’s sake man, tuck your shirt in at least’, yelled Keans, working himself into a frenzy, ‘and dare I ask where you found a lawyer for the defence?’

‘I didn’t look Your Honour, I decided to represent myself. Save on fees. Open and shut case like this, I �gured I could handle it myself. What do you think so far?’ ‘�is is a court case, the judge doesn’t hand out advice. I’ve had about enough of this, I’m putting an end to it all. Get out of my courtroom. Get out n-‘ ‘Objection’, shouted Kingston, ‘you’ve not given us a verdict yet.’ ‘Objection? You can’t object over the judge’, Keans screamed, his face crimson with outrage, ‘I will have order!’ ‘Wait’ said Bailey, standing up suddenly, ‘can I join that order, I haven’t eaten today.’ Before Keans had a chance to process this Kingston began again, scurrying back over to the desk of the plainti�. ‘I’d just like to say that there is nothing ‘open and shut’ about all this. I never signed an indemnity form so I’m well within me rights.’ ‘Indemnity form?’ asked the judge. ‘Ah yes’, said Kingston, striding back to the defence, ‘it’s standard practice to have everyone sign an indemnity form in case something happens. I had not thought it necessary in this case.’ ‘Of course’, piped the court o�cer, ‘that would just be strange now, wouldn’t it?’ ‘Mr Mills, you will be quiet in my courtroom,’ roared Keans, ‘they don’t need any help.’ Crossing over to the plainti� desk Kingston leant down to Bailey. ‘Look at him now; shouting at people, ordering us around, who does he think he is?’Keans glared at Kingston, and using every ounce of self-control he stared to speak in a calm voice, albeit it through tightly clenched teeth. ‘Mr Kingston, it occurs to me that giving you a verdict is likely the easiest way of getting rid of you. I �nd the defence guilty of neglect in the aforementioned training session. Mr Kingston I rule that not only will you have to pay for medical treatment, but you will pay the court costs of both parties. Now get out of my courtroom.’ ‘Well thank you Mr Bailey,’ said Kingston as they excited the room, ‘we won and you’re gunna be playing in the big leagues after people hear about this.’ ‘Wow, the big leagues. But I don’t know if I’m ready for that.’ ‘Take it from me’, said Kingston, ‘I may have lost, but there’s no shame in losing to the best. In fact, I’m thinking about appealing the judge’s decision, need another case?’ ‘I’d be honoured to represent both of you.’

THE WAY IT’S HEADING...DAVID KENNEDY

28

‘All rise for Judge Keans’ called the court o�cer.Judge Keans settled himself down in his high-backed chair. ‘Case is Kingston vs Kingston’ announced the o�cer. ‘So Mr Kingston,’ Judge Keans began as he reviewed his notes, ‘You have been injured in Mr Kingston’s martial arts class and are suing for medical costs, is that right?’�e plainti� sat in a wheelchair, with his arm bandaged and in a sling. ‘�at’s right Mr Judge,’ began the injured man in a strange half-english accent that Keans struggled to place, ‘during his class I performed an exercise as he instructed and ended up injuring meself. He should have to pay for me injuries as it’s his fault I’m like this,’ he said indicating his wheelchair and sling. ‘You will call me Your Honour when addressing me Mr Kingston. If you are quite done, I’d like to hear from the defence.’ ‘�at’s me for now, Mr Honour, sir,” replied the plainti�. Upon saying this he climbed out of his wheelchair and crossed to the other side of the court. ‘Mr Kingston, what exactly are you doing out of your wheelchair?’ asked the judge. ‘Well I only did the wheelchair thing for the sympathy vote. Me lawyer’s idea. Clever ain’t it?’ came the answer. ‘Clever, what are you-‘ ‘You said you wanted to talk to the defendant?’ Kingston said in a broad Australian accent. He looked up at the judge as he reached the reached the desk of the defence. ‘Here I am, Your Honour.’ ‘You are the defendant? What is the meaning of this?’ ‘I am being sued unfairly Your Honour. A man should stand up for his right.’ ‘But this is absolutely ridiculous,’ cried Keans. ‘I know. It’s a martial arts gym, someone’s bound to get hurt. Anyone with common sense should realise that when they join.’ ‘How did this get to my court? Who handled this case before now? Where on earth did you �nd lawyers to argue such insanity?’ spluttered the judge incredulously, his face beginning to turn red. ‘Well’, came the half-english reply, ‘I did have to shop around a bit, but this bloke was willing to have a go.’ Mr Kingston pointed across the room at a man behind the accuser’s desk. �e young man stood up and scratched the three day stubble on his chin. ‘�e name’s Bailey Sir and I just �gured it’s never been done, and maybe I could get my name out if I set a precedent in this kind of thing.’ ‘Get your name out? Set a precedent? You think it likely that this could start happening more and more? You’re mad, and you don’t even look like a lawyer. For god’s sake man, tuck your shirt in at least’, yelled Keans, working himself into a frenzy, ‘and dare I ask where you found a lawyer for the defence?’

‘I didn’t look Your Honour, I decided to represent myself. Save on fees. Open and shut case like this, I �gured I could handle it myself. What do you think so far?’ ‘�is is a court case, the judge doesn’t hand out advice. I’ve had about enough of this, I’m putting an end to it all. Get out of my courtroom. Get out n-‘ ‘Objection’, shouted Kingston, ‘you’ve not given us a verdict yet.’ ‘Objection? You can’t object over the judge’, Keans screamed, his face crimson with outrage, ‘I will have order!’ ‘Wait’ said Bailey, standing up suddenly, ‘can I join that order, I haven’t eaten today.’ Before Keans had a chance to process this Kingston began again, scurrying back over to the desk of the plainti�. ‘I’d just like to say that there is nothing ‘open and shut’ about all this. I never signed an indemnity form so I’m well within me rights.’ ‘Indemnity form?’ asked the judge. ‘Ah yes’, said Kingston, striding back to the defence, ‘it’s standard practice to have everyone sign an indemnity form in case something happens. I had not thought it necessary in this case.’ ‘Of course’, piped the court o�cer, ‘that would just be strange now, wouldn’t it?’ ‘Mr Mills, you will be quiet in my courtroom,’ roared Keans, ‘they don’t need any help.’ Crossing over to the plainti� desk Kingston leant down to Bailey. ‘Look at him now; shouting at people, ordering us around, who does he think he is?’Keans glared at Kingston, and using every ounce of self-control he stared to speak in a calm voice, albeit it through tightly clenched teeth. ‘Mr Kingston, it occurs to me that giving you a verdict is likely the easiest way of getting rid of you. I �nd the defence guilty of neglect in the aforementioned training session. Mr Kingston I rule that not only will you have to pay for medical treatment, but you will pay the court costs of both parties. Now get out of my courtroom.’ ‘Well thank you Mr Bailey,’ said Kingston as they excited the room, ‘we won and you’re gunna be playing in the big leagues after people hear about this.’ ‘Wow, the big leagues. But I don’t know if I’m ready for that.’ ‘Take it from me’, said Kingston, ‘I may have lost, but there’s no shame in losing to the best. In fact, I’m thinking about appealing the judge’s decision, need another case?’ ‘I’d be honoured to represent both of you.’

29

Page 32: Opus November

Run

by

stud

ents

for

stu

dent

s -

You

r vo

ice

on c

ampu

s -

NU

SA