OPTIMAL CONNECTIONS: STRENGTH AND

DISTANCE IN VALUED GRAPHS• Yang, Song and David Knoke

• RESEARCH QUESTION:• How to identify optimal

connections, that is, direct or indirect paths between dyads that permit the highest exchange volumes while taking into account the actors’ costs of interaction?

Binary

• CONNECTIONS IN BINARY GRAPHS • Graph is depicted as a two dimensions by a set of

nodes representing actors and a set of lines representing the direct ties between a pair (dyad) respectively.

• We are concentrating on undirected, symmetric graphs that reflect mutual interactions. Marriages between persons, and contracts between corporations are two good cases in point. If A is married to B, B must be married to A as well.

Binary 2

• In binary graphs, the presence of connection between a pair of nodes is indicated by a constant value of 1. In contrast, the absence of connection is indicated by a value of 0.

• In a graph, a path is a set of distinct nodes and lines that connect a specific pair of nodes. A length of a path refers to the number of lines in it. The path distance between two nodes is defined as the length of the shortest path.

Binary 3

• In binary graphs, path distance is normally used to indicate the optimal connections between a pair of nodes. This solution assumes that intermediaries are costly. If more intermediaries are necessary to connect a pair of actors, they may extract higher commissions for their services, distort the information content exchanged, and increase the time required to complete a transaction.

A binary graph

• An Illustration

D

B

C

A

E

1

1

1

1 1

1

• EXAMPLE FOR THE DYAD AB• PATH LENGTH OPTIMAL CONNECTION

• A-B 1 1

• A-E-B 2 N/A

• A-E-D-C-B 4 N/A

CONNECTIONS IN VALUED GRAPHS

• Valued graph is defined as a graph whose lines carry numerical values indicating the intensities of the relationships between all dyads. These numbers typically represent frequencies or durations of interactions among social actors; for example, volumes of communications, levels of friendship and trust, or dollar amounts of economic transactions. For organizations engaging in strategic alliances, a valued graph might indicate the numbers of distinct partnerships formed between each pair.

Valued Graph

• Illustration

D

B

C

A

E

1

3

3

2 4

6

Problems in Measuring OP in Valued Graphs

• In valued graphs, using path length to indicate optimal connection is not applicable because the shortest path is less identifiable.

• Previous researchers propose two solutions to measure optimal connections in valued graphs. Peay (1980) states that path value, defined as the smallest value attached to any line in a path, indicates the optimal path between a pair of nodes.

Path Valued

• EXAMPLE FOR THE DYAD AB• PATH OPTIMAL CONNECTION

• A-B 1• A-E-B 3• A-E-D-C-B 2• This solution assumes that lower path

values represent bottlenecks that impede the interactions between two nodes.

The problems of Peay’s path value solutions

How to determine the path value/optimal connection when multiple paths/path

values present between two nodes.

How to account for the transaction costs of exchanges involving many go-

betweens.

Flament’s Solution

• Flament (1963) uses path length, defined as the sum of the values of the lines included in a path, to represent the optimal connection between a pair of nodes.

• EXAMPLE FOR THE DYAD AB• PATH OPTIMAL CONNECTION• A-B 1• A-E-B 6• A-E-D-C-B 15

The Problems with Flament’s path length solution.

 No standard for which stands for optimal connection among results from Flament’s path length. whether larger or smaller path lengths are viewed as optimal for connecting dyads.

 If larger values indicate optimal connection. Then a high number can result when either (1) the lines in a path have high values, or (2) a path has many lines with low values that sum to a large total. And the solution fails when the second situation occurs.

 Else if lower values represent optimal connection. Then a low number can result when either (1) the lines in a path have low values, or (2) a path has few lines that add up to a small value.

OUR SOLUTION

• Bring binary distance back to the equations. We argue that including binary distance is especially crucial for measuring path strength in a valued graph because it takes into account the costs (in time, energy, or decay of information) required for indirectly connected dyads to reach one another through varying numbers of intermediaries.

• We now formally define two measures of path strength applicable to valued graphs. A valued graph G consists of three sets of information

Definitions

   A set of nodes N = {n1, n2, … ng}• A set of lines between pairs of nodes L =

{l1, l2, … lg}– A set of values attached to the lines V =

{v1, v2, … vg}. • A path between nodes ni and nj consists of a

sequence of distinct lines connecting the pair through one or more intermediaries, expressed as:

       {li,i+1, li+1,i+2, … lj-2,j-1, lj-1,j},

Definitions

• The dual subscripts indicate the origin and terminus nodes of each line.

• The minimum value Mij of a path between nodes ni and nj is the smallest value of any line in that path, indicated as

•          Mij = min (vi,i+1, vi+1,i+2, … vj-2,j-1, vj-1,j). •  • Notice that Mij is actually Peay’s path value.

Solution

• The distance of that path Dij is the total number of lines where each line has a value of one, which is indicated as

•          Dij = (li,i+1 + li+1,i+2 … + lj-2,j-1 + lj-1,j ).•  • Note that this sum is identical to distance in

a corresponding binary graph, obtained by counting the number of lines in a path connecting nodes ni and nj.

Solution

• IllustrateThen, a measure of average path value between nodes

ni and nj is the ratio of path value to distance, indicated by

ij

ijij D

MAPV

Note that a pair of nodes may have multiple paths,

thus containing multiple APVs. We suggest that the highest APV indicates the optimal connection between the pair of nodes because it permits the highest volume of transactions/messages/contracts/treaties/friendships after controlling for the binary distance between the two nodes.

Path of AB Binary Distance Path Value APV AB 1* 1 1.00 AEB 2 3* 1.50* AEDCB 4 2 0.50

D

B

C

E

1

3

3

2 4

6

• SolutionIMPLEMENTATION ISSUES

Unfortunately, available social network software does not work according to our solution. Consider the following example,

Dyad BC: Binary Distance Path Value APV BC 1* 2 2.00* BEDC 3 3* 1.00 BAEDC 4 1 0.25

Our Optimal Connection UCINET Solution

D

B

C

A

E

1

3

3

2 4

6

Why differs

• How UCINET chooses a different result to represent the optimal connections? The algorithm works like this,

• Find the highest path value among the multiple paths Between a pair of nodes, thinking this is the optimal path.

• In our example, UCINET picks 3 for the path

• BEDC, thinking it is the optimal path connecting the dyad BC.

• Calculating the binary distance associated with the

• optimal path it just picked up between the pair of

• nodes. In our example, it was 3 for the path BEDC. • Dividing the highest path value by its binary distance, saying that I get

the APV. In our example, it was 3/3=1.

What We Want

• We want,• Finding the path values for all the paths between a

dyad.• Calculating the binary distances for all the paths.• Dividing each path values by its binary distance, • producing multiple APVs for a dyad.• Picking up the highest APV to represent the

optimal connection between the dyad, which is 2/1=2 in our example.

How big of a difference

• Such a difference in computing optimal connection between UCINET and our solution produces only one discrepancy in our example with five nodes and 10 dyads.

C52 = 5!/3!*2!=10, which is the maximum

number of dyad relationships for 10 actors.

It can be worse

• However, social scientists rarely deal with 5 by 5 matrix. Instead, many of the matrices contain 10s, 100s, or even 1000s of actors, forming symmetrical matrices with many dimensions.

• Suppose we have a matrix with 100 actors. It can have a maximum C100

2 = 100!/2!*98!=4,950 dyads. If UCINET and our solution have 10% disagreement, we are expecting 495 discrepancies between UCINET output and our expected output, which is less tolerable.

Real Solutions

• Choose a right algorithm such as Floyd-Walshall algorithm, used in computing shortest path in valued graphs.

• Its implementation appears in web search of a shortest path between two locations in “mapblast” or “yahoo map.”

• Implement the algorithm using any languages such as C, C++, JAVA, or FORTRAN.

• Keeping track of the binary distances for each and every Paths between a pair of nodes turns out to be a difficult task. Thus,

• We are waiting for a successful implementation of a right algorithm to solve our research problem.