Optical Diode

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Optical Diode

    1/4

    One-way optical transmission in silicon grating-photoniccrystal structures

    Yanyu Zhang,1 Qiang Kan,2 and Guo Ping Wang1,3,*1School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

    2Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials Science, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China3College of Electronic Science and Technology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

    *Corresponding author: [email protected]

    Received May 14, 2014; revised July 2, 2014; accepted July 15, 2014;posted July 16, 2014 (Doc. ID 212072); published August 15, 2014

    One-way optical transmission through a composite structure of grating-photonic crystal (PC) is presented. This uni-directional transportation property originates from the diffraction of grating to change the direction of light incidentinto the PC from pseudobandgaps to passbands of the PC. Numerical simulation shows that a light beam in a certainrange of frequencies can transmit the composite structure when it is incident from the grating interface but is com-pletely reflected by the structure when it is incident from the PC interface, which is further verified experimentally.The present structure may provide another more compact way for designing on-chip optical diode-like integrateddevices. 2014 Optical Society of America

    OCIS codes: (130.3120) Integrated optics devices; (230.5298) Photonic crystals; (230.1950) Diffraction gratings.http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.004934

    Recently, much research has been devoted to all-opticaldevices due to their important potential applications inoptical communication and quantum computers [1,2].

    A unidirectional transmission device, which allows lightto pass in one direction but be blocked in the oppositedirection, is a fundamental element among them. In orderto realize unidirectional propagation, magneto-optic ma-terials [35], optics nonlinearity [68], metamaterials[911], and indirect interband photonic transition [12],etc., have been employed. On the other hand, structureslike dielectric or metal gratings [1315], parity time sym-metry waveguides [16,17], plasmonic subwavelength slits[18,19], and photonic crystals (PCs) with pseudobandg-aps [2022] have been reported. However, grating andPC slab structures may be a little more complicated torealize in experiment or have lower one-way contrastratio and higher loss. Plasmonic subwavelength slits usu-ally work in a narrow band of frequency. In this Letter,we present a simple and compact composite structure ofsilicon grating-PC to realize one-way transmission in awideband range of frequency with reasonable high-contrast ratio and low loss.

    Figure1(a)shows the schematic configuration of thepresent composite grating-PC structure. It consists of arectangular grating and a two-dimensional PC with thesame height (h 320 nm). The PC has a square latticeconstructed with circular silicon rods. The lattice con-

    stant is a 600 nm, and the radius of the silicon rodsis r 225 nm. The thickness of the rectangular silicongrating is t 210 nm, and the grating constant isag 1800nm, with slit width w 600 nm. The distancebetween the grating and PC is d, which is a variation inthe following discussion.

    Figure1(b)shows the simulated transmission spectraof a transverse magnetic (TM) polarized plane light nor-mally incident from the grating interface (forward, redsolid line) and PC interface (backward, blue dash line),respectively, by using the finite-difference time-domain(FDTD) method [23]. In the simulations, the refractiveindex of silicon is set to 3.49 at 1400 nm and the distance

    between grating and PC is d93

    nm. From the figure,we can see that there exists an asymmetric transmissionregion ranging from 1355 to 1375 nm (gray region).For instance, at wavelength 1360 nm, the forward trans-mission of light forms a peak with a transmittance T(transmitted light intensity divided by the incident lightintensity) of about 95% (black arrow), while the transmit-tance of light in the backward direction is around 1%, in-dicating that the incident light can only pass through thecomposite structure in the forward direction.

    On the other hand, we can also see that the transmis-sion of light ranging from 1470 to 1630 nm (green slashedregion) is around zero from either the forward andbackward direction, which indicates that light withwavelength falling into this range of frequency showsno unidirectional transmission.

    Figures 1(c) and 1(d) show the simulated electricalfield intensity distributions of a TM light at 1360 nm in-cident in the forward [Fig.1(c)] and backward [Fig.1(d)]directions, respectively. The arrows indicate the direc-tions of the incident light. We can see that when the lightis incident from the grating interface into the compositestructure (forward) it can pass through the grating-PCstructure to the outside [Fig. 1(c)]. However, when thelight is incident from the PC interface into the structure(backward), it is reflected back completely by severallayers of PC [Fig. 1(d)].

    To understand the physics underlying the above one-way transportation of light, we calculate the TM-modeband structure of the PC (see Fig. 2) by using the

    plane-wave expansion method [24]. The frequency is nor-malized by, where is the incident wavelength.a From theband structure, we can see that there exists a directionalbandgap (gray region) between the third and fourthbands, ranging from 2c 0.4428 to 2c0.4086 (from 1355 to 1470 nm in wavelength). Such agap stops the propagation of light along the X direc-tion but allows the propagation of light along the Mdirection. Therefore, by using a grating to change the di-rection of light (ranging from 1355 to 1375 nm) incident

    4934 OPTICS LETTERS / Vol. 39, No. 16 / August 15, 2014

    0146-9592/14/164934-04$15.00/0 2014 Optical Society of America

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.004934http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.004934http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_10/
  • 8/11/2019 Optical Diode

    2/4

  • 8/11/2019 Optical Diode

    3/4

    region). Figure 3(b) shows the measured transmissionspectra of light incident into the composite structure withd 93 nm in the forward (red circle, solid line) andbackward directions (blue x dashed line). For compari-son, the simulated transmission of light beam from theforward (red solid line) and backward directions (bluedashed line) are also presented in the figure. We see that,at wavelength 1360 nm, nearly 75% of the incident light is

    passed through the grating-PC structure in the forward

    direction, while only around 1% of the light can transmitthe structure as it is incident in the backward direction,indicating that the light can propagate through the struc-ture in one incident direction, but will be reflected in theopposite direction. The difference between the experi-mental measurement and numerical simulation [95%transmittance of light in the forward direction; seeFig. 1(b)] can be attributed to the fact that a part ofthe incident light is leaked out from the structure surfacein experiments.

    We also measured the transmission spectra of the in-cident light ranging from 1470 to 1500 nm (within the fullbandgap of the PC) [see inset of Fig. 3(b)]. We can seethat it does not matter whether the illumination is inthe forward or backward directions, the transmittanceof the light is no more than 2%, indicating that the lightshows no one-way transmission but instead is completelyforbidden by the composite structure in both forwardand backward directions.

    We also investigate the effect of distance d betweengrating and PC on the one-way transmission. We intro-duce a one-way contrast ratio Cs as Cs TF TBTFTB [25], where TF and TB are the forward andbackward transmittances, respectively. Figure 3(c)shows the Cs dependence on d as the incident light isset at three wavelengths. We can see from the figure thatthe one-way contrast ratio shows little dependence onthe distance between grating and PC when the incidentlight is at different wavelengths. For example, as the in-cident light is at 1360 nm, theCs is around 0.73 and 0.75as d 170 nm and 93 nm, respectively (red square,dotted line). From this, we can conclude that the

    present composite grating-PC structure shows goodproperties in one-way transmission as the distance be-tween grating and PC is changed within a certain valueof ranges.

    On the other hand, when the thickness of grating ischanged, it mainly influences the transmittance of theunidirectional transmission of the structure. This is be-cause the thickness of gratings will, in general, affect

    the diffraction efficiency of light, so as to change the in-tensity of light incident into the PC. While the grating con-stant is changed, it will change the direction anddiffraction efficiency of illumination light incident intothe PC. If it makes the wave vector of light into thePC still fall in the stopband of the PC after diffractedby the grating, the structure will show no unidirectional

    propagation. Otherwise, unidirectional transmission ap-pears. Our calculations (not shown here) reveal that,although some grating constants still make the one-way transmission of structure work, it may reduce thetransmittance of the structure. This means that thegrating constant may affect both the function of

    unidirectional transmission and the transmittance ofgrating-PC structures.

    When the light source is tilted, it may fall into the pass-band of the PC. Hence, even when there is no grating infront of the PC, light may pass through the structure nomatter what (forward or backward) direction of light isincident, indicating that one-way transmission phenome-non will disappear. In the case of grating being present,tilted illumination will affect the contrast ratio of one-

    way transmission and even destroy the unidirectionaltransmission, because it will modulate the direction oflight incident into the PC. This is in principle similarto the case where grating constant in front of PC ischanged.

    In conclusion, we have demonstrated both numericallyand experimentally a simple and compact grating-PCstructure for wideband and high-contrast asymmetricoptical transmission. Such a unidirectional optical trans-

    portation property originates from the role the gratingplayed in changing the direction of light incident intothe PC from the pseudobandgap to the passbands ofthe PC. The present structure may provide another moreeffective way for designing on-chip optical diode-likeintegrated devices.

    This work was supported by 973 Program(2011CB933600) and National Natural Science Founda-tion of China (Grant 11274247).

    References

    1. J. L. OBrien, G. J. Pryde, A. G. White, T. C. Ralph, and D.Branning, Nature 426, 264 (2003).

    2. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature 409, 46(2001).

    3. L. Bi, J. Hu, P. Jiang, D. H. Kim, G. F. Dionne, L. C.Kimerling, and C. A. Ross, Nat. Photonics 5, 758(2011).

    4. M. Levy, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 22, 254 (2005).5. T. R. Zaman, X. Guo, and R. J. Ram, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90,

    023514 (2007).6. M. Soljai, C. Luo, J. D. Joannopoulos, and S. Fan, Opt.

    Lett. 28, 637 (2003).7. K. Gallo, G. Assanto, K. R. Parameswaran, and M. M. Fejer,

    Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 314 (2001).8. L. Fan, J. Wang, L. T. Varghese, H. Shen, B. Niu, Y. Xuan,

    A. M. Weiner, and M. Qi, Science 335, 447 (2012).9. Y. D. Xu, C. D. Gu, B. Hou, Y. Lai, J. S. Li, and H. Y. Chen,

    Nat. Commun. 4, 2561 (2013).10. M. Mutlu, A. E. Akosman, A. E. Serebryannikov, and E.

    Ozbay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 213905 (2012).11. C. Menzel, C. Helgert, C. Rockstuhl, E. B. Kley, A.

    Tnnermann, T. Pertsch, and F. Lederer, Phys. Rev. Lett.104

    , 253902 (2010).12. Z. Yu and S. Fan, Nat. Photonics 3, 91 (2009).13. Z. H. Zhu, K. Liu, W. Xu, Z. Luo, C. C. Guo, B. Yang,

    T. Ma, X. D. Yuan, and W. M. Ye, Opt. Lett. 37, 4008(2012).

    14. W. M. Ye, X. D. Yuan, and C. Zeng, Opt. Lett. 36, 2842(2011).

    15. C. Cheng, J. Chen, Q. Y. Wu, F. F. Ren, J. Xu, Y. X. Fan, andH. T. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 111111 (2007).

    16. H. Ramezani, T. Kottos, R. El-Ganainy, and D. N.Christodoulides, Phys. Rev. A82, 043803 (2010).

    17. L. Feng, M. Ayache, J. Huang, Y. L. Xu, M. H. Lu, and Y. F.Chen, Science 333, 729 (2011).

    18. E. Battal, T. A. Yogurt, and A. K. Okyay, Plasmonics8, 509(2013).

    4936 OPTICS LETTERS / Vol. 39, No. 16 / August 15, 2014

  • 8/11/2019 Optical Diode

    4/4

    19. S. Cakmakyapan, A. E. Serebryannikov, H. Caglayan, and E.Ozbay, Opt. Lett. 35, 2597 (2010).

    20. A. E. Serebryannikov, Phys. Rev. B 80, 155117 (2009).21. C. C. Lu, X. Y. Hu, H. Yang, and Q. H. Gong, Opt. Lett. 36,

    4668 (2011).22. C. Wang, C. Z. Zhou, and Z. Y. Li, Opt. Express 19, 26948

    (2011).

    23. A. Taflove and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electrody-namics: The Finite Difference Time-Domain Method,2nd ed. (Artech House, 2000).

    24. K. M. Ho, C. T. Chan, and C. M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 3152 (1990).

    25. X. F. Li, X. Ni, L. Feng, M. H. Lu, C. He, and Y. F. Chen, Phys.Rev. Lett. 106, 084301 (2011).

    August 15, 2014 / Vol. 39, No. 16 / OPTICS LETTERS 4937