35
Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Operations Management

Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Page 2: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 2

Today’s Lecture

How information and incentives impact the performance?

Supply Chain Coordination

Vertical Integration

Page 3: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 3

Manufacturers

Wholesale Distributors

Suppliers Customers

Information FlowGoods Flow

Retailers

A Simplified Supply Chain

Revenue Flow

Page 4: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 4

Supply Chain Management (SCM)

Supply Chain Management (SCM) concerns the coordination and optimization of all supply, manufacturing, distribution and logistics activities from raw materials to finished goods to the customer.

SCM strives to use the supply chain as a mutually beneficial competitive tool.

Page 5: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 5

Multiple Perspectives

Raw Materials Suppliers

Component Manufacturer

Systems Integrator

Assembler

Integrated Manufacturer

Logistics Provider

Distributor

Customer

Page 6: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 6

SCM Goals

Maximize profits of all supply chain partners

How to do it? Get the right product, in the right quantity, to

the right customer at the right time with minimum cost, proper documentation and financial reconciliation

Difficulty: Each partner has its own goal

Page 7: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 7

Channel Coordination

What are the objectives? What is channel coordination? Why are channels not coordinated? How can we coordinate channels?

Page 8: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 8

Channel Coordination: Example

A single publisher sells a book to a retailer. Demand for the book is:

Production cost (c) = 9 Revenue (p) = 39 Good-will (g) = 0 Holding cost (h) = 1 Whole sale price (w) = 19 Salvage value is assumed to be 0.

Demand 1000 2000 3000 4000

Probability 0.2 0.3 0.25 0.25

Page 9: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 9

Decentralized Decision Making

Simple Supply Chain

Production cost c Wholesale price w

Selling price p

Holding cost h

Manufacturer Retailer Demand

Page 10: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 10

Decentralized Decision Making

How much does the retailer order?Cu = p-w

Co = w-0+h

P(D≤ Q)= Cu/(Cu+Co) = (p-w)/(p-w+w+h)

P(D≤ Q)= (p-w)/(p+h)

Page 11: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 11

Centralized Decision Making

What if the supply chain was vertically integrated?

Manufacturer acquired retailer.

Production cost c Wholesale price w becomes irrelevant.

Selling price p

Holding cost h

Manufacturer Retailer Demand

Page 12: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 12

Centralized Decision Making

How much does the integrated company produce?P(D ≤ Q)=(p-c)/(p+h)

Page 13: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 13

Question is…

Which supply chain is better? Decentralized decision making Centralized decision making

Page 14: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 14

Channel Coordination

Suppose each entity is independent. How many books will the retailer stock? P(D ≤ Base Stock) = (p – w) / (p + h)

= (39 – 19) / (39 +1) = 20 / 40 = 0.50

Demand 1000 2000 3000 4000Probability 0.2 0.3 0.25 0.25

It is optimal for the retailer to stock 2,000 books.

Page 15: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 15

Channel Coordination

What is the profit of the publisher? 2000(19-9) = 20,000

Demand 1000 2000 3000 4000Probability 0.2 0.3 0.25 0.25

What is the expected profit of the retailer?Expected Salvaged = 0.2(2000 – 1000) =

200

Expected sold = 0.2(1000) + 0.8(2000) = 1800

What is the profit of the retailer?1800(39-19) – 200(19+1) =36000-4000 = 32000

What is the profit of the channel?

32000 + 20000 = 52,000

Page 16: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 16

Channel Coordination:

Suppose you own both bookstore and the publisher:

What is the optimal number of books to be printed by the publisher and offered by the retailing department?

It is optimal for the company to print 3000 books.

Demand 1000 2000 3000 4000Probability 0.2 0.3 0.25 0.25

P(D ≤ Base Stock) = (p – c) / (p + h)

= (39 – 9) / (39 + 1) = 30 / 40 =0.75

Page 17: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 17

Channel Coordination

What is the optimal expected profit of the publishing company?

Expected profit = – Printing cost – Expected holding cost + Expected revenue

Expected Salvaged = 0.2(3000 – 1000) + 0.3(3000-2000) = 700

Expected sold = 0.2(1000) + 0.3(2000) +0.5(3000)= 2300

What is the profit of the retailer?

2300(39-9) – 700(9+1) =69000-7000 = 62000

Demand 1000 2000 3000 4000Probability 0.2 0.3 0.25 0.25

Page 18: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 18

Question

Notice: The profit in the integrated company is $62,000

The profit in the disintegrated company is only $52,000

Why are they leaving some money on the table?

Double marginalization

Page 19: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 19

Double Marginalization

What can be done to increase: The channel profit The publisher profit The retailer profit Recall that there is $10,000 on the table.

Page 20: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 20

Channel Coordination: Solutions

Type of channel coordination solutions Buy back Revenue Sharing Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) Consignment Options

Page 21: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 21

Double Marginalization: The Solution

Suppose the publisher is willing to purchase back all the excess inventory

In return for this service, he might change the wholesale price

Page 22: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 22

Double Marginalization A Solution

Example: Production cost (c) = 9 Revenue (p) = 39 Goodwill (g) = 0 Holding cost (h) = 1 Wholesale price (w) = 12 Buy back price = 4

What is the retailer service level? P(D≤Q) = (39 – 12)/(39+1 – 4) = 27/36 = 0.75 Exactly the same as the integrated system

Page 23: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 23

Double Marginalization: A Solution

It is optimal for the retailer to purchase 3,000 units.

The retailer’s profit:

= – 3000*12 – (1 – 4)*{0.2*(3000 – 1000)+0.3*(3000 – 2000)}

+ 39*{0.2*1000+0.3*2000+0.5*3000}

= – 36000 + 3*(400+300) + 39*(200+600+1500)

= – 36000 + 2100 + 39*2300= – 36000 + 84000 = $55,800

The retailer’s profit is $55,800.

Page 24: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 24

Double Marginalization: The Solution

What is the profit of the publisher?= 3000*(12 – 9) – 4*{0.2*2000+0.3*1000}

= 9000 – 2800 = 6200

What is the channel profit? 55800+6200 = $62,000 The same profit as the integrated system.

Why is the profit the same?

Has the problem been solved?

Page 25: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 25

Review

Previously: Profit publisher: $20,000 Profit retailer: $32,000

System with buy back Profit publisher: $6,200 Profit retailer: $55,800

Do you think implementing the buy back system is feasible?

Page 26: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 26

Double Marginalization: The Solution

We must ensure that both publisher and retailer benefit

How can we do that? (p – w) / (p + h – b) = 0.75 (39 – w)/(39+1 – b) = 0.75 39 – w = 30 – 0.75b 9 + 0.75b = w All pairs (w,b) that satisfy the above equation will

coordinate the channel. When the channel is coordinated the retailer will

purchase 3000 units.

Page 27: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 27

Double Marginalization: The solution

For some pairs (w,b), both players will benefit from coordination:

When w = 21 then b = 16 The service level is: (39–21)/(39+1–16) = 18/24=0.75 Publisher profit = 3000 * (21 – 9) –

16*{0.2*2000+0.3*1000} = 36000 – 10200 = $25,800

Retailer profit = $36,200 Both players gained by the buyback arrangement

Page 28: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 28

Buy Back: General Solution

General solution:

Find a solution such that:

hp

cp

system integrated level service

retailer level servicehp

wp

bhp

wp

hp

cp

Page 29: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 29

Vertical Integration

No Integration Upstream Integration Downstream Integration

Raw Materials

IntermediateManufacturing

Assembly

Distribution

End Customer

Raw Materials

Intermediate Manufacturin

g

Assembly

Distribution

End Customer

Raw Materials

IntermediateManufacturing

Distribution

End Customer

Assembly

Page 30: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 30

Article Reading

"Back to the Future: Benetton Transforms it’s Global network" MIT Sloan management Review, Fall 2001.

Page 31: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 31

Benetton

Factors contributing to success Delayed dyeing Network organization for manufacturing Network organization for distribution

Benetton’s strategy in supply chain management Product design (customized by region) Supply and production (strong upstream vertical integration) Retail network (mixed downstream vertical integration)

Diversifying into sports

Page 32: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 32

Vertical Integration

To decide whether to vertically integrate, consider:

Cost: Cost of market transactions between firms vs. cost of administering the same activities internally within a single firm

Control: Impact of asset control, which can impact barriers to entry and which can assure cooperation of key value-adding players.

Coordination/Information Sharing

Page 33: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 33

Vertical Integration: Drawbacks

Capacity balancing issues For example, the firm may need to build excess

upstream capacity to ensure that its downstream operations have sufficient supply under all demand conditions.

Potentially higher costs Due to low efficiencies resulting from lack of supplier

competition. Economy of scale/risking pooling from outsourcing

Page 34: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 34

Factors against Vertical Integration

The vertically adjacent activities are in very different types of industries. For example, manufacturing is very different from retailing.

The addition of the new activity places the firm in competition with another player with which it needs to cooperate. The firm then may be viewed as a competitor rather than a partner.

Page 35: Operations Management Session 25: Supply Chain Coordination

Session 25 Operations Management 35

Alternatives to Vertical Integration

Long-term explicit contracts

Franchise agreements

Joint ventures

Co-location of facilities

Implicit contracts (relying on firms' reputation)