13
Open Collaboration Exchange Alexander Blanc, Niels van Dijk, Jocelyn Manderveld, Remco Poortinga - van Wijnen VAMP 2013, Espoo

Open Collaboration Exchange

  • Upload
    danae

  • View
    27

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Open Collaboration Exchange. Alexander Blanc , Niels van Dijk, Jocelyn Manderveld , Remco Poortinga - van Wijnen VAMP 2013, Espoo. Current situation ( good news ). AAI/FIM well established across Europe and elsewhere - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Open Collaboration Exchange

Open Collaboration Exchange

Alexander Blanc, Niels van Dijk, Jocelyn Manderveld, Remco Poortinga - van Wijnen

VAMP 2013, Espoo

Page 2: Open Collaboration Exchange

Current situation (good news)

• AAI/FIM well established across Europe and elsewhere• Solid growth (NL) on number of connected IDPs, SPs and usage• eduGAIN bridges HE&R fields

Page 3: Open Collaboration Exchange

SURFconext statistics

Page 4: Open Collaboration Exchange

Most used services

• All ‘campus centric’ type of services (not surprisingly)

• Also internal services (portal, timetable, …)

• Institutions somewhat reluctant to move to the cloud (for employees)• Google apps mostly for students only

Page 5: Open Collaboration Exchange

But…

• eduGAIN only start of a solution (enabling)

• Although eduGAIN connects HE&R, no bridge to other (commercial/research) communities/fields yet (see VCH)

• (HE&R) Federations typically not allowed to connect other IdPs

• Most IdPs focus on ‘campus centric’ services

• Difficult to get IdPs to connect to services for a subset of users• E.g. VO services…• Opt-out vs opt-in?• Try ‘zero attribute’ authentication?

• No simple magic solution

Page 6: Open Collaboration Exchange

So…

• Can we apply ideas from the network world?

• Especially network exchanges?

• See From Network Exchange to Collaboration Exchange - A guided tour https://tnc2012.terena.org/core/session/10

• Make it easy to connect and let participants decide who they want to work with

Page 7: Open Collaboration Exchange

O.C.E. why? Transnational

• Several use cases show:• Federated approach needed as ‘enterprise’ IDM trust models are poorly suited for

collaborative cross-sector and transnational activities• Transnational collaboration is hindered by differences in federation readiness,

licensing issues, technical and other barriers.

• OCE allows entities to connect to multiple trust frameworks on one technical platform

• OCE will support several well established trust frameworks (e.g. eduGAIN) by default

• OCE significantly lowers barriers for transnational cloud service delivery

Page 8: Open Collaboration Exchange

O.C.E. why? Cross-sector

• OCE supports cross-sector collaboration capabilities out of the box

• OCE specifically supports public/private partnerships

• Therefore decreasing need for guest access

• OCE enables knowledge transfer on federated approaches from research and education to other sectors

Page 9: Open Collaboration Exchange

What are Open Collaboration Exchanges?

• An transnational infrastructure for identity- and service providers to interconnect, facilitating authentication-, authorization- and group management processes

• An infrastructure;• that combines a technical infrastructure (a "switchboard") with multiple behavioural trust/policy

frameworks• and thus allows entities to connect to multiple trust frameworks on one technical platform

• An open and secure platform, using open standards, based on open source (OpenConext) technology

• Self-service configuration interfaces for all participants

• Ecosystem for ‘value-added services’, such as a higher level of authentication, statistics, provisioning, metering/billing, etc.

• Aimed towards implementation of multi-stakeholder governance and maintenance

• Enabler of cross-sector and transnational collaboration and service delivery

Page 10: Open Collaboration Exchange

O.C.E. What it is not

• A replacement for eduGAIN• Leverages/uses eduGAIN and other services/trust frameworks

• Pixie dust for collaboration• Still a lot (most?) effort for non-technical issues

• A trust framework itself• ‘Only’ aggregator with optional added self-service functions

• A finished product• Still very much a concept/idea, many many things still unclear

Page 11: Open Collaboration Exchange

O.C.E. Overview

OCE(self-service)

IDP1

IDP2

Trust framework• eduGAIN• SURFconext• DIGID

Trust framework• eduGAIN• WAYF

SP1

SP2

Trust framework• SURFconext• DIGID

Trust framework• eduGAIN

eduGAIN• IDP1• IDP2• SP2

Entree• IDP1• SP1

DIGID• IDP1• SP1

trust framework2• IDP1• SP2

OCE(metadata)

Page 12: Open Collaboration Exchange

O.C.E. What’s next?

• Engage• Different (european) educational federations • Several OpenConext pilot partners• eduGAIN• Global partners

• Learn• AMS-IX, Netherlight and other exchanges• Possible similar ideas, initiatives or projects

• Partnerships• Work with strategic partners on innovation, governance, and funding

• Pilots• In research and education• Cross-sector

Page 13: Open Collaboration Exchange

O.C.E. pointers

• eduGAIN www.edugain.org

• OpenConext www.openconext.org

• From Network Exchange to Collaboration Exchange - A guided tour https://tnc2012.terena.org/core/session/10

• MARIO https://tnc2013.terena.org/core/session/27

• Collaboration Exchange for Services and Identities https://blog.surfnet.nl/?p=2392