62
On the Road to Developing Nemeth Braille Code Competencies for Beginning TVIs: Findings of a Two-Part Study L. Penny Rosenblum, Ph.D. University of Arizona Derrick Smith, Ed.D. University of Alabama at Huntsville

On the Road to Developing Nemeth Braille Code Competencies for Beginning TVIs: Findings of a Two-Part Study L. Penny Rosenblum, Ph.D. University of Arizona

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • On the Road to Developing Nemeth Braille Code Competencies for Beginning TVIs: Findings of a Two-Part Study L. Penny Rosenblum, Ph.D. University of Arizona Derrick Smith, Ed.D. University of Alabama at Huntsville
  • Slide 2
  • Development of Literary Braille Competencies AER Personnel Preparation Division formed a group to investigate the development of standards for literary braille. Sandy Lewis, Frances Mary DAndrea and L. Penny Rosenblum conducted a Delphi Study (JVIB, 2012). Next logical step was to conduct a Delphi Study to investigate the development of standards for Nemeth code.
  • Slide 3
  • Nemeth Delphi Committee Members Paul Ajuwon Sheila Amato Donna Brostek Lee Tina Herzberg Sunggye Hong Cheryl Kamei-Hannan Beth Harris Patricia Myers L. Penny Rosenblum Derrick Smith Sandy Smith Adam Wilton Kim Zebehazy
  • Slide 4
  • Committee Procedure Questionnaire developed to collect demographic data A list of Nemeth code skills was developed A list of skills in other codes (foreign language, music, computer), abacus, and tactile graphics was developed
  • Slide 5
  • Purpose of the Demographic Study To gather information on how university programs prepare future teachers of students with visual impairments in the areas of the Nemeth braille, foreign language braille, computer braille, music braille codes, the abacus, and tactile graphics.
  • Slide 6
  • Study Procedure 39-item questionnaire using online survey software Open to university programs in the United States and Canada for six weeks in fall 2011 22 individuals representing 26 universities participated
  • Slide 7
  • Delivery of Course Content Content Face-to Face On-LineHybrid Literary Braille 7711 Nemeth Braille 799 Foreign Language Braille 886 Music Braille 676 Computer Braille 867 Abacus 798 Tactile Graphics 7513
  • Slide 8
  • How Content is Delivered Content PrimaryEmbeddedCorrespondN/A Literary Braille 25100 Nemeth Braille 24110 Foreign Language Braille 31805 Music Braille 21617 Computer Braille 31805 Abacus 101330 Tactile Graphics 42101
  • Slide 9
  • Tools Used to Produce Braille Content PerkinsS&SBrl Em.Brl. Tran.Elec. Literary Braille 26 221614 Nemeth Braille 2611844 Foreign Language Braille 140811 Music Braille 90900 Computer Braille 1001144 Abacus -- Tactile Graphics --
  • Slide 10
  • All University Programs Required Students to Demonstrate Mastery Numerals Numeral indicator Punctuation indicator English letter indicator Fraction indicator Fractions Operations Comparison Decimals Problems in Linear Format
  • Slide 11
  • Most University Programs Required Students to Demonstrate Skills SkillMastery Basic Knowledge None Problems in Spatial Format 251-- Level Indicator 251-- Groupings 251-- Radical Indicator 215-- Multipurpose Indicator 215-- Radicals 1051
  • Slide 12
  • Algebra and Geometry Had More Variability SkillMastery Basic Knowledge None Absolute Value 1772 Shapes 179-- Arrows 1511-- Angles 1511-- Lines 12131 Arcs 9107
  • Slide 13
  • Advanced Math Had Even More Variability SkillMastery Basic Knowledge None Functions 8126 Logarithms 4913 Advanced Math 6137 Matrices 21014
  • Slide 14
  • Nemeth Resources Resource RequiredRec.ShownNoUnsure An Introduction to Braille Mathematics 143352 The Nemeth Braille Code for Mathematics and Science Notation 912311 Mathematics Made Easy for Children with Visual Impairment 221203 Braille Codes and Calculations 526113
  • Slide 15
  • Nemeth Resources Resource RequiredRecom.ShownNoUnsure Learning Nemeth Braille Code 134360 Strategies for Developing Mathematics Skills in Students Who Use Braille 74861 Chapter on Nemeth code in New Programmed Instruction in Braille 1131102 Braille Code of Chemical Notation 108161
  • Slide 16
  • Resources Shared with Students TSBVI web site (n=10) APH web site and/or reference sheet (n=9) National Braille Press web site or books (n=5) BANA web site or books (n=5) Project Math Access web site or materials (n=4)
  • Slide 17
  • How Students Demonstrate Competence Homework or weekly tests (n=23) Final exam (n=18) Midterm exam (n=5) Less frequently mentioned: Lesson plans Postings on discussion boards Adapting materials
  • Slide 18
  • Procedures 13 programs allowed students to resubmit homework. 7 programs did not allow students to resubmit homework. 1 program required students to write out what rules were not followed. Few programs allowed students to remediate final or midterm exams.
  • Slide 19
  • Foreign Language Braille Code Foreign language braille was at the exposure level. Few programs required a homework assignment. BANA web site was shared as a resource.
  • Slide 20
  • Foreign Language, Computer and Tactile Graphics Resources Content RequiredRecom.ShownNoUnsure Interim Manual for Foreign Language 145141 The Computer Braille Code Made Easy 118121 Computer Braille Code 66671 Tactile Graphics 0410111
  • Slide 21
  • Computer Braille Code Almost all programs gave a brief introduction to computer braille code. 2 programs indicated that computer braille code was integrated into an assistive technology course.
  • Slide 22
  • Music Braille Code Dancing Dots and Library of Congress were web sites shared with students. Few programs required students to complete a braille music homework.
  • Slide 23
  • Music Resources Content RequiredRecom.ShownNoUnsure Who is Afraid of Braille Music 115163 How to Read Braille Music 0210113 Music Braille Code 37892
  • Slide 24
  • Abacus Five programs required students to complete an abacus course from Hadley School for the Blind. Thirteen programs had students on an exam compute using an abacus. Three programs had students do homework assignments with an abacus. Three programs had students teach a child to compute with an abacus. Eight programs allowed students to redo abacus assignments and ten did not.
  • Slide 25
  • Abacus Resources Resource RequiredRecom.ShownNoUnsure Use of the Cranmer Abacus 102843 The Abacus Made Easy 531073 Abacus Basic Competency: A Counting Method 321183
  • Slide 26
  • Tactile Graphics Five programs shared BANA guidelines. Ten programs shared APH guidelines and materials (e.g., Draftsman, models). Nineteen programs had specific assignments and activities. Twenty-three programs required students to prepare tactile graphics. Three programs had exam questions about tactile graphics.
  • Slide 27
  • Rosenblum, L. P. & Smith, D. (2012). Instruction in Specialized Braille Codes, Abacus, and Tactile Graphics at Universities in the United States and Canada. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(6), 339-350.
  • Slide 28
  • NEMETH DELPHI
  • Slide 29
  • Development of the Delphi Instrument 13-member focus group developed 29 statements that could be competencies. Panelists rated each statement for reading and writing. For each statement panelists rated the level of importance and the type of references to be used (none, code reference, book). Agreement level was set at 85%.
  • Slide 30
  • Criteria to Join the Nemeth Delphi Panel In the last three years taught at least one course on how to read and write Nemeth code Taught the Nemeth code for at least three semesters / quarters Taught the Nemeth code for at least three or more years Taught in the United States or Canada Taught skills for students to read and write Nemeth code
  • Slide 31
  • Read/Write in Context Linear Problems Reading Importance: Extremely Important (100%, n = 20) References: No References (94%, n = 17) Writing Importance: Extremely Important (95%, n = 19) References: No References (94%, n = 17)
  • Slide 32
  • Read/Write Punctuation Signs, Symbols used in Nemeth Reading Importance: Extremely Important (100%, n = 20) References: No References (94%, n = 17) Writing Importance: Extremely Important (100%, n = 20) References: No Agreement
  • Slide 33
  • Read/Write Simple Fractions/Mixed Numbers Reading Importance: Extremely Important (100%, n = 20) References: No References (94%, n = 19) Writing Importance: Extremely Important (100%, n = 20) References: No Agreement
  • Slide 34
  • Read/Write Computation in Spatial Format Reading Importance: Extremely Important (100%, n = 20) References: No References (94%, n = 17) Writing Importance: Extremely Important (100%, n = 20) References: No References (94%, n = 17)
  • Slide 35
  • Read/Write Expressions w/Grouping Symbols, Including Parentheses Reading Importance: Extremely Important (100%, n = 20) References: No References (94%, n = 17) Writing Importance: Extremely Important (95%, n = 19) References: No Agreement
  • Slide 36
  • Read/Write Expressions w/Decimals, Percentages, Negative Numbers Reading Importance: Extremely Important (85%, n = 17) References: No References (94%, n = 16) Writing Importance: Extremely Important (100%, n = 20) References: No Agreement
  • Slide 37
  • Read/Write Expressions w/More Advanced Signs of Comparison Reading Importance: Extremely Important (94%, n = 17) References: Code Reference (89%, n = 16) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Code Reference (94%, n = 17)
  • Slide 38
  • Read/Write Expressions with Superscripts Reading Importance: Extremely Important (94%, n = 16) References: Code Reference (89%, n = 16) Writing Importance: Extremely Important (85%, n = 17) References: No Agreement
  • Slide 39
  • Read/Write Expressions with Subscripts Reading Importance: Extremely Important (89%, n = 16) References: No Agreement Writing Importance: No Agreement References: No Agreement
  • Slide 40
  • Read/Write Expressions with Radicals Reading Importance: Extremely Important (94%, n = 17) References: Code Reference (89%, n = 16) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: No Agreement
  • Slide 41
  • Read/Write Expressions with Complex Numbers Reading Importance: No Agreement References: No Agreement Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (89%, n = 16)
  • Slide 42
  • Read/Write Letters Representing Measurement Units Reading Importance: Extremely Important (94%, n = 17) References: No References (89%, n = 16) Writing Importance: Extremely Important (94%, n = 16) References: Code Reference (89%, n = 16)
  • Slide 43
  • Read/Write Nemeth Code Signs of Comparison Reading Importance: Extremely Important (89%, n = 16) References: Code Reference (89%, n = 16) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Code Reference (89%, n = 16)
  • Slide 44
  • Read/Write Nemeth Code Signs for Rates and Derived Measurements Reading Importance: Extremely Important (89%, n = 16) References: No Agreement Writing Importance: No Agreement References: No Agreement
  • Slide 45
  • Read/Write Formulae for Area/Volume of Geometric Figures Reading Importance: No Agreement References: No Agreement Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (90%, n = 18)
  • Slide 46
  • Read/Write Letters Used to Symbolize Variables Reading Importance: Extremely Important (94%, n = 17) References: No References (94%, n = 17) Writing Importance: Extremely Important (94%, n = 17) References: No Agreement
  • Slide 47
  • Read/Write Algebraic Equations w/Polynomials, Rational Numbers Reading Importance: Extremely Important (89%, n = 16) References: Code Reference (89%, n = 16) Writing Importance: Extremely Important (89%, n = 16) References: No Agreement
  • Slide 48
  • Read/Write Algebraic Equations w/Logarithmic Numbers Reading Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (94%, n = 17) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (95%, n = 18)
  • Slide 49
  • Read/Write Algebraic Equations using Periodic Functions Reading Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (94%, n = 17) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (85%, n = 17)
  • Slide 50
  • Read/Write Algebraic Equations using Inequalities Reading Importance: Extremely Important (89%, n = 16) References: Code Reference (89%, n = 16) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: No Agreement
  • Slide 51
  • Read/Write Statements Using Shape Indicators Reading Importance: Extremely Important (94%, n = 17) References: No Agreement Writing Importance: Extremely Important (94%, n = 17) References: Reference Book (89%, n = 16)
  • Slide 52
  • Read/Write Compass Directions Using Arrow Indicators Reading Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (89%, n = 16) Writing Importance: Somewhat Important (89%, n = 16) References: Reference Book (85%, n = 17)
  • Slide 53
  • Read/Write Symbols for Congruence, Similar, Parallel, Perpendicular Reading Importance: Important (89%, n = 16) References: No Agreement Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (89%, n = 16)
  • Slide 54
  • Read/Write Coordinate Indicators Reading Importance: Extremely Important (89%, n = 16) References: No References (94%, n = 17) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: No Agreement
  • Slide 55
  • Read/Write Indicators for Angles, Lengths, Arcs, Perimeters, Areas, Volume Reading Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (94%, n = 17) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (85%, n = 17)
  • Slide 56
  • Read/Write Trigonometric Indicators for Length and Angle Measurements Reading Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (95%, n = 18) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (94%, n = 17)
  • Slide 57
  • Read/Write Cartesian Coordinates, Navigational, Polar, Spherical Reading Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (89%, n = 17) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (95%, n = 19)
  • Slide 58
  • Read/Write Indicators for Plane, Vectors, Function Notation, Matrices Reading Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (95%, n = 18) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (100%, n = 20)
  • Slide 59
  • Read/Write Various Indicators/Equations for Statistical Data Reading Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (95%, n = 18) Writing Importance: No Agreement References: Reference Book (100%, n = 19)
  • Slide 60
  • Final Thoughts University programs place a greater emphasis on literary & Nemeth braille codes than other braille codes. There is variability in the competencies students must demonstrate in Nemeth code when it comes to more advanced (middle school and up) math. Abacus computation is taught at most universities though the level of proficiency students must demonstrate varies.
  • Slide 61
  • Final Thoughts The Delphi panel agreed on the following: The level of importance for 20 reading statements The level of importance for 12 writing statements The level of references for 22 reading statements The level of importance for 17 writing statements
  • Slide 62
  • Whats Next? Publication of a second article in JVIB in 2013 (Smith & Rosenblum) Possible follow-up study to find out more about what students at various age levels are reading and writing in Nemeth code Discussion with the Personnel Preparation Division about the adoption of Nemeth code competencies by university programs