Upload
chika
View
49
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Chiral-even and odd faces of transverse Sum Rule Trieste(+Dubna), November 24 2006. Oleg Teryaev JINR, Dubna. Outline. Even chirality of spin and angular momentum operators Comparing longitudinal and transverse sum rules: g_1 -> g_T - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Chiral-even and odd faces of transverse Sum Rule Trieste(+Dubna), November 24 2006
Oleg TeryaevJINR, Dubna
Outline Even chirality of spin and angular momentum operators
Comparing longitudinal and transverse sum rules: g_1 -> g_T Non-zero contribution of Gluon Spin to transverse SR Burkhatrdt-Cottingham sum rule: similarity of longitudinal and
transverse spin structure Chiral-odd BLT SR – test of dynamical picture of nucleon,
relations of even and odd – POSSIBLE! Belinfante invariance and equivalence principle – possible
violation in the case of transversity appearance in Spin Sun Rule
Relation to Sivers functions, Burkardt SR and Brodsky/Gardner conjecture
Free vs bounded particles – longitudinal case
Free vs bounded particles – transverse case Density matrix – 2 terms responsible for
1 2 transverse polarization - chiral odd twist
2 transversity (1) and chiral even twist –3 g_T SAME for free particles –
independent for quarks bounded in a nucleon
Field-tyheoretical origin of parton model sum rules
Momentum and Spin sum rules
How derive SR for longitudinal and transverse spin?
Different components of angular momentum tensor and Pauli-Lubanski vector do not commute – one needs yo specify projection onto space-like vector n, (nP)=0.
Different projections (T vs L)– lead to appearance of different parton distributions – but ALWAYS chiral-even
Quarks:
Various projections of axial current:
Related by EOM to quark-gluon correlations
Gluons No gluonic transversity for spin-1/2
BUT transverse twist 3 distribution analogous to quark case:
May contribute to jet double transverse asymmetries at RHIC
Transverse sum rule Similar to longitudinal
Twist 3 not suppressed in SR – no Q Spins same as L due to BC SR Orbital -?
Different L and T orbital momenta – natural from the point of view of Brodsky-
Gardner conjecture
Sivers function similar to (transverse) L and AMM
Small singlet Sivers -> Small singlet AMM -> EQUIPARTION of
momentum and TOTAL angular momentum + small gluon spin -> large (longitudinal) orbital momentum
Transversity and BLT sum rule Should imply some relation of even and odd
operators May test DYNAMICAL picture of nucleon
which ay be surprisingly simple Say, transversity may be quite well
understood kinematically(Efremov, OT, Zavada) relating even and odd terms – may justify (implicit) notion of free particles – explains larger values of transversity than helicity
Fractional sum rule for transversity (Pire, Soffer, OT)
First moment is not conserved, but
May be a candidate for models/NPQCD
Chiral-even transverse SR –supported by EQUIVALENCE principle
Belinfante invariance -> spin in (chiral-even) orbital form
Momentum+Angular momentum conservation -> JI SR
Equivalence principle
Newtonian – “Falling elevator” + Anomalous gravitomagnetic
moment iz ZERO or Classical and QUANTUM rotators
behave in the SAME way
Electromagnetism vs Gravity
Interaction – field vs metric deviation
Static limit
Mass as charge – equivalence principle
Gravitational formfactors
Conservation laws - zero Anomalous Gravitomagnetic Moment : (g=2)
Moments of GPD’s (X. Ji)- may be extracted from high-energy experiments/NPQCD calculations
Describe the partition of angular momentum between quarks and gluons
Valid for any spin projection! Appearance of chiral-odd term in angular momentum conservation may violate EP – unless it is related to chiral-even
Gravitomagnetism Gravitomagnetic field – action on spin –
½ from spin dragging twice smaller than EM Lorentz force – similar to EM case: factor
½ cancelled with 2 from Larmor frequency same as EM
Orbital and Spin momenta dragging – the same - Equivalence principle
Generalization of Equivalence principle
Various arguments: AGM 0 separately for quarks and gluons – most clear from the lattice (LHPC/SESAM)
Extended Equivalence Principle=Exact EquiPartition In pQCD – violated Reason – in the case of EEP- no
smooth transition for zero fermion mass limit (Milton, 73)
Conjecture (O.T., 2001 – prior to lattice data) – valid in NP QCD – zero quark mass limit is safe due to chiral symmetry breaking
Another arguments in favour of EEP J=1/2 -> J=1. QCD SR calculation of Rho’s AMM
gives g close to 2. Maybe because of similarity of moments. Gluons momentum fraction sizable. Direct calculation for AGM are desired!
“Valence” Parametrization of E (GPV) – remarakble relations between valence quantities - physical input – EQUIPARTITION
Relation: E -> Sivers; EP -> Burkardt SR; EEP -> Brodsky/Gardner conjecture
Conclusions
Standard derivation -> chiral-even transverse SR
Longitudinal and transverse quark and gluon spins – same if BCSR is valid
L and T Orbital momenta – related to Brodsky et al conjectures
Chiral-odd sum rules – may test dynamical picture of nucleon
Spin (L and T)sum rules – related to equivalence principle; independent chiral-odd terms may violate it