21
OFFICE OF SCIENCE Review Committee (CD-1) for the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) Project at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory October 30-November 1, 2012 Daniel R. Lehman Review Committee Chair Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

OFFICE OF SCIENCE Review Committee (CD-1) for the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) Project at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory October 30-November

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE

Review Committee (CD-1)for the

Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment(LBNE) Project

at

Fermi National Accelerator LaboratoryOctober 30-November 1, 2012

Daniel R. LehmanReview Committee Chair

Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energyhttp://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

2

DOE Review of LBNE

DOE EXECUTIVE SESSION AGENDA

Tuesday, October 30, 2012—Comitium

08:00 a.m. DOE Executive Session D. Lehman08:15 a.m. HEP Perspective M. Procario/T. Lavine08:25 a.m. FSO Perspective P. Carolan08:35 a.m. Questions08:45 a.m. Adjourn

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE

LBNE website:https://sharepoint.fnal.gov/project/lbne/reviews/CD1-DOE-Review-Oct-2012/SitePages/Home.aspx

username: review password:rev2pass

DOE Organization Chart

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE

3

Office of the SecretaryDr. Steven Chu, Secretary

Deputy Secretary* Daniel B. Poneman

Associate Deputy SecretaryMelvin G. Williams, Jr.

Office of the Under Secretary

for Nuclear Security

Thomas P. D’AgostinoUnder Secretary

For Nuclear Security

*The Deputy Secretary also serves as the Chief Operating Officer.

25 Jul 12

U.S. Energy InformationAdministration

Bonneville PowerAdministration

Southwestern PowerAdministration

Southeastern PowerAdministration

Western Area PowerAdministration

Intelligence andCounterintelligence

Assistant Secretary forPolicy and International

Affairs

Assistant Secretary forCongressional and

Intergovernmental Affairs

General Counsel

Chief FinancialOfficer

Chief Human CapitalOfficer

Chief InformationOfficer

Public Affairs

Economic ImpactAnd Diversity

Deputy Administratorfor Defense Programs

Deputy Under Secretaryfor Counter-terrorism

Associate Administratorfor Emergency

Operations

Associate Administratorfor Acquisition &

Project Management

Deputy Administratorfor Defense Nuclear

Nonproliferation

Deputy Administratorfor Naval Reactors

Associate Administratorfor Defense Nuclear

Security

Office of the Under Secretary

for Science

VacantUnder Secretary

for Science

Office of Science

Advanced ScientificComputing Research

Basic Energy Sciences

Biological andEnvironmental Research

Fusion Energy Science

High Energy Physics

Nuclear Physics

Office of the Under Secretary

VacantUnder Secretary

Associate Administratorfor External Affairs

Workforce DevelopmentFor Teachers/Scientists

Management

Health Safety andSecurity

Hearings and Appeals

Advanced ResearchProjects Agency-Energy

Loans ProgramOffice

American Recovery &Reinvestment Act Office

Federal EnergyRegulatory Commission

Inspector General

Assistant Secretaryfor Environmental

Management

Assistant Secretaryfor

Fossil Energy

Legacy Management

Indian EnergyPolicy and Programs

Assistant Secretaryfor Energy Efficiency

and Renewable Energy

Assistant Secretaryfor Electrical Delivery and

Energy Reliability

Assistant Secretaryfor

Nuclear Energy

Associate Administratorfor Info. Management

& CIO

Associate Administratorfor Management &

Budget

Associate Administratorfor Safety & Health

Technology TransferCoordinator

Chief of Staff

National NuclearSecurity Administration

Office ofGeneral Counsel

4

OFFICE OF

SCIENCESC Organization Chart

Office of the Director (SC-1)William F. Brinkman

Advanced ScientificComp. Research (SC-21)

Daniel Hitchcock (A)

Workforce Development for Teachers/

Scientists (SC-27)

P. Dehmer (A)Basic Energy

Sciences (SC-22)Harriet Kung

Fusion EnergySciences (SC-24)

Edmund Synakowski

High EnergyPhysics (SC-25)James Siegrist

Biological & Environ. Research (SC-23)

Sharlene Weatherwax

Nuclear Physics(SC-26)

Timothy Hallman (A) Acting

7/2012

Deputy Directorfor Science Programs (SC-2)

Patricia Dehmer

Deputy Directorfor Resource Management (SC-4)

Jeffrey Salmon

Deputy Directorfor Field Operations (SC-3)

Joseph McBrearty

Office of Project

Assessment (SC-28)Daniel

Lehman

Office of Budget (SC-41)

Kathleen Klausing

Office of Scientific and Tech. Info. (SC-44)

Walt Warnick

Office of SC Program Direction (SC-46)

Daniel Division

Office of Grants/ Cont. Support (SC-43)Linda Shariati

Office of Business Policy

& Ops (SC-45)Vasilios

Kountouris

SC Communications & Public Affairs

(SC-4)Dolline Hatchett

Ames SOCynthia Baebler

Thomas Jeff. SOJoe Arango

Stanford SOPaul Golan

Pacific NWest SORoger Snyder

Princeton SOMaria Dikeakos

Oak Ridge SOJohnny Moore

Fermi SOMichael Weis

Brookhaven SOMichael Holland

Berkeley SOAundra Richards

Argonne SOJoanna Livengood

SCIntegratedSupportCenter

Office of Lab Policy & Evaluat.

(SC-32)J. LaBarge

(A)

Office of Safety,

Security & Infra.(SC-31)

M. Jones

Human Resources & Admin.(SC-45.3)

Cynthia Mays

Small BusinessInnovationResearch(SC-29)

Manny Oliver

Oak Ridge Office

Larry C. Kelly

Chicago Office

Roxanne Purucker

5

OFFICE OF

SCIENCEReview Committee Participants

Daniel R. Lehman, Chairman

SC1 SC2 SC3Beamline Detectors Conventional

* Tom Roser, BNL * Bill Wisniewski, SLAC * Marty Fallier, BNLKevin Jones, ORNL Richard Loveless, U of Wisconsin Brad Bull, MSU/FRIBPhil Pile, BNL David Nygren, LBNL Bob Law, SLAC

SC4 SC5 SC6Environment, Safety and Health Cost and Schedule Management

* Ian Evans, SLAC * Barbara Thibadeau, ORNL/SNS * Aesook Byon, BNLFrank Kornegay Rick Blaisdell, DOE/APM Thomas Glasmacher, MSU/FRIB

Kin Chao, DOE/SC Evelyn Landini, DOE/BHSOKurt Fisher, DOE/SC Ron Lutha, DOE/ASOBrian Huizenga, DOE/APM Steve Meador, DOE/SC

LEGEND

Jim Siegrist, DOE/SC Mike Weis, DOE/FSO SC SubcommitteeMike Procario, DOE/SC Jerry Kao, DOE/ASO * ChairpersonTed Lavine, DOE/SC Hemant Patel, DOE/BSO [ ] Part-time Subcommittee MemberJohn Kogut, DOE/SC Glenn Kubiak, LBNLAlan Stone, DOE/SC COUNT: 22 (excluding observers)Pepin Carolan, DOE/FSOSteve Webster, DOE/FSO

Observers

6

Charge Questions

1. Does the conceptual design provide increased research capabilities envisioned in the mission need? Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements recently recommended by the LBNE reconfiguration steering committee?

2. Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration?

3. Does the proposed project team and staffing plan offer adequate management experience, technical expertise, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline required for CD-2?

4. Are ES&H aspects being properly addressed and are future plans sufficient given the project's current stage of development?

5. Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval?

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE

7

Agenda

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE

Tuesday, October 30, 2012—Comitium, WH2SE 8:00 am DOE Executive Session D. Lehman 9:00 am Welcome/Plenary Sessions – One West (WH1W) P. Oddone

9:10 am Project Overview J. Strait 9:40 am Project Design Cost and Schedule E. McClusky10:10 am Break10:25 am Conventional Facilities Overview T. Lundin10:50 am SURF Working w/LBNE M. Headley11:00 am Beamline Overview V. Papadimitriou11:25 am Far Detector Overview J. Stewart 11:50 am Near Detector Complex Overview C. Mauger12:00 pm Lunch 1:00 pm Parallel Subcommittee Breakout Sessions (see attached schedule) 4:30 pm Subcommittee Executive Sessions – in Parallel Breakout Session Rooms 5:00 pm DOE Executive Session D. Lehman 6:30 pm Adjourn

8

Agenda

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE

Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:00 am Parallel Subcommittee Breakout Sessions 9:30 am Break—Outside Comitium 9:45 am Subcommittee Breakout Sessions12:00 pm Subcommittee Executive Sessions – Working Lunch—WH2XO 1:00 pm Response to Day 1 reviewer questions/questions from morning

breakout—Comitium 2:00 pm Subcommittee Working Session—Comitium 2:45 pm Break—Outside Comitium 3:00 pm DOE Full Committee Executive Session D. Lehman

Thursday, November 1, 2012 8:00 am Subcommittee Working Session—Comitium10:00 am Break—Outside Comitium10:15 am DOE Committee Executive Session Dry Run D. Lehman 12:00 pm Working Lunch 1:00 pm DOE Summary and Closeout—One West D. Lehman 2:00 pm Adjourn

9

Report Outline/ Writing Assignments

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE

Executive SummaryMeador

1. IntroductionProcario

2. Technical Systems – Instruments (Charge Questions 1, 2, 3, 5) 2.1 BeamlineRoser*/SC1

2.1.1 Findings2.1.2 Comments2.1.3 Recommendations

2.2 DetectorsWisnieski*/SC2

3. Conventional Facilities (Charge Questions 1, 2, 3, 5) Fallier*/SC3

4. Environment, Safety and Health (Charge Questions 4, 5) Evans*/SC4

5. Cost and Schedule (Charge Questions 2, 3, 5) Thibadeau*/SC5

6. Management (Charge Questions 3, 5) Byon*/SC6

10

Closeout Presentation

and Final Report

Procedures

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE

11

Format:Closeout Presentation

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE

(PowerPoint; No Smaller than 18 pt Font)

2.1 Use Section Number/Title corresponding to writing assignment list.

List Review Subcommittee Members

List Assigned Charge Questions and Review Committee Answers

2.1.1 Findings

• In bullet form, include an assessment of technical, cost, schedule, and management.

2.1.2 Comments

• In bullet form, list descriptive material assessing the findings and the conclusions based on the findings. This is narrative material and is often omitted as a separate heading and the narrative included either under Findings or Recommendations as appropriate. This heading carries more emphasis than the Findings, but does not require an action as do the Recommendations. Do not number your comments.

2.1.3 Recommendations

1. Begin with action verb and identify a due date.

2.

12

Format:Final Report

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE

(MSWord; 12 pt Font)

2.1 Use Section Number/Title corresponding to writing assignment list.

2.1.1 Findings

Include an assessment of technical, cost, schedule, and management. Within the text of the Findings Section, include the answers to the review questions.

2.1.2 Comments

Descriptive material assessing the findings and the conclusions based on the findings. This is narrative material and is often omitted as a separate heading and the narrative included either under Findings or Recommendations as appropriate. This heading carries more emphasis than the Findings, but does not require an action as do the Recommendations. Do not number your comments.

2.1.3 Recommendations

1. Begin with action verb and identify a due date.

2.

3.

13

Present closeout reports in PowerPoint.

Forward your sections for each review report (in MSWord format) to Casey Clark, [email protected],

by November 5, 8:00 a.m. (EST).

OFFICE OF

SCIENCEExpectations

Closeout Report on the Review Committee (CD-1)

for the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment

(LBNE) Projectat

Fermi National Accelerator LaboratoryOctober 30-November 1, 2012

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE

Daniel R. LehmanReview Committee Chair

Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energyhttp://www.science.doe.gov/opa/

15

1. Does the conceptual design provide increased research capabilities envisioned in the mission need? Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements recently recommended by the LBNE reconfiguration steering committee?

2. Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration?

3. Does the proposed project team and staffing plan offer adequate management experience, technical expertise, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline required for CD-2?

5. Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval?

Findings Comments Recommendations

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE2.1 BeamlineRoser, BNL*/SC1

16

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE2.2 DetectorsWisnieski, SLAC*/SC2

1. Does the conceptual design provide increased research capabilities envisioned in the mission need? Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements recently recommended by the LBNE reconfiguration steering committee?

2. Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration?

3. Does the proposed project team and staffing plan offer adequate management experience, technical expertise, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline required for CD-2?

5. Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval?

Findings Comments Recommendations

17

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE3. Conventional FacilitiesFallier, BNL*/SC3

1. Does the conceptual design provide increased research capabilities envisioned in the mission need? Does the conceptual design satisfy the performance requirements recently recommended by the LBNE reconfiguration steering committee?

2. Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration?

3. Does the proposed project team and staffing plan offer adequate management experience, technical expertise, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline required for CD-2?

5. Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval?

Findings Comments Recommendations

18

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE4. Environment, Safety and HealthEvans, SLAC*/SC4

4. Are ES&H aspects being properly addressed and are future plans sufficient given the project's current stage of development?

5. Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval?

Findings Comments Recommendations

19

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE5. Cost and ScheduleThibadeau, ORNL*/SC5

2. Do the conceptual design report and supporting documentation adequately justify the stated cost range and project duration?

3. Does the proposed project team and staffing plan offer adequate management experience, technical expertise, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline required for CD-2?

5. Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval?

Findings Comments Recommendations

20

OFFICE OF

SCIENCEProject Status ChartThibadeau, ORNL*/SC5

PROJECT STATUSProject Type MIE / Line Item / Cooperative Agreement

CD-1 Planned: Actual:

CD-2 Planned: Actual:

CD-3 Planned: Actual:

CD-4 Planned: Actual:

TPC Percent Complete Planned: _____% Actual: _____%

TPC Cost to Date      

TPC Committed to Date  

TPC  

TEC  Contingency Cost (w/Mgmt Reserve) $ _____% to goContingency Schedule on CD-4b ______months _____%

CPI Cumulative     SPI Cumulative  

21

OFFICE OF

SCIENCE6. ManagementByon, BNL*/SC6

3. Does the proposed project team and staffing plan offer adequate management experience, technical expertise, and Laboratory support to produce a credible technical, cost and schedule baseline required for CD-2?

5. Have all prerequisite requirements for CD-1 approval been satisfied? Is the project ready for CD-1 approval?

Findings Comments Recommendations