Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
. :.^;
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
In Re State of Ohio,Shawn Collins, Jr.P.O. Box 7881150 North Main Street
Mansfield, Ohio 44901
Case No.
Petitioner,
vs.
Terry A. Tibbals, WardenMansfield Correctional Institution1150 North Main StreetMansfield, Ohio 44901-
,i^ ^/"; :1 '•, Ii-<:
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEASCORPUS I'LrRSIJAN"I' T'tI OnIoREVISED CODE 2725. ET SEQ.
ComplaintHearing Requested
Respondent.
ORIGINAi, PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
FOR PETITIONER
Email: [email protected]
RESPONDENT
Terry A. Tibbles, WardenMansfield Correctional Institution1150 Nnrtli_% 7Yt cA^ ^
Sam I'hoanas, lYl, Esq., (0067848)21403 Chagrin Boulevard, #295Beachwood, Ohio 44122(216) 357-3300 Office(216) 357-3700 Fax(216) 229-1521 DirectE-mail: [email protected]
r'•',`y 5.f ^tie^,,t^. T ^ ^ ^^S: .1
..:^^
AUG 22 ?,,uf^'
CLERK OF COiIR°l°LR.EMECO^(^T OF OHIO
. ...^.i:..
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
In Re State of Ohio,Shawn Collins, Jr.P O.13ox 7881150 North Main Street
Mansfield, Ohio 44901
Case No.
Petitioner,
vs.
Terry A. Tibbals, WardenIt'Iansfield, Correctional Institution1150 North Main StreetMansfield, Ohio 44901
PF,TI'i'YON F®R. WRIT OF ^^ABEASCORPUS PURSUANT TO OHIOREVISED CODE 2725. ET SEQ.
ComplaintHearing Requested
Respondent.
ORIGINAL PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
FOR PETITIONER
Email: samic^st3attorn.ey.com
RESFONDENT
Terry A. Tibbles, WardenMansfield Correctional Institution.1150 North Main StreetMansfield, Ohio 44901
REEMo
^>-,^^.^^^^ n ^-^ _^ ,
^^^
CLERK OF COURT^EMF. COURT OF OHiO
Table Of Contents
Page
Jurisdiction ... ................... ......;............. ..................................................................... 1
Cause of Action . . . ... ......... .....................>................................................................... 2
Law and Argument . . . ............ ..............:........................................................................ 4
Conclusion ... ................................................................................ .............................. 5
APPENDIX:
Exhibit "A" Indictments (5 Pages)
Exhibit "B" Sentencing Entry (1 Page)
Exhibit "C" Journal Entry w/SherifPs Return (I :Page)
Exhibit "D" Sentencing Transcripts (6 Pages)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
In Re State of Ohio,Shawn Collins, Jr.P.O. Box 7881150 North Main Street
Man sfield, Ohio 44901
Case No.
Petitioner,
vs.
Terry A. Tibbals, WardenMansfield Correctional Institution1150 North Main StreetMansfield, Ohio 44901
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEASCORPUS PURSUANT TO OHIOREVISED CODE 2725. ET SEQ.
ComplaintHearing Requested
Respondent.
ORIGINAL PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Now comes Shawn Collins, Jr., Petitioner, by and through undersigned counsel, and moves this
Honorable Court, pursuant to Ohio Revised Code §2725 et. seq., for a Writ of Habeas Corpus as set
forth herein below.
JURISDICTION
1. Petitioner has no other remedy at law to raise his claims of: (1) ineffective assistance of trial
counsel; (2) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel; and, (3) that trial court imposed a void
sentence.
2. This Honorable Court has jurisdiction to grant the petition for writ of HABEAS CORPUS
according to Ohio Const. Art. IV, Sec. 2 and R.C. §2725.02, in accordance with State v.
Yarbough, 104 Ohio St.3d 1, 2004 Ohio 6087, 817 N.E.2d 845 and State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio
St.3d 153, 2010 Ohio 6314.
CAUSE OF ACTION
3. Petitioner, a juvenile, was charged with aggravated robbery and felonious assault in
connection with an incident allegedly involving Gerald Henderson and Anthony
Henderson. Following a hearing pursuant to R.D. 2152.12, the matter was
subsequently transferred to the General Division of the Court of Common Pleas,
Defendant was subsequently indicted for three counts of aggravated robbery with one
and three-year firearm specifications and one count of felonious assault with one and
three-year firearm speatcations. Defendant pled not guilty, and the matter proceeded
to a jury trial on January 29, 2007.
4. On February 7, 2007, Petitioner was found guilty of Aggravated Robbery as charged in
Counts 1, 3, and 4 of the indictment, not guilty of Aggravated Robbery as charged in
Count 2 and guilty of Felonious Assault as charged in Count 5 of the indictment.
Subsequently the trial Court immediately proceeded to sentencing rather than ordering
a pre-sentence investigation to determine the appropriateness of an extremely long
prison term for a juvenile. The trial Court then sentenced the Petitioner to 23 years in
prison: (3 years on firearm specifications to be served prior to and consecutive to 5
years on each of Counts 1, 3, 4 and 5.) There was no objection by trial counsel for the
failure to hold a pre-sentence investigation and no objection to the imposition of
consecutive sentences on Counts 1, 3, and 4. (Tr. P, s 610 - 615. )
5. On March 7, 2007, Petitioner, by and through Appellate Counsel, appealed his
conviction. While the consecutive nature of Petitioner's sentence was raised on direct
appeal, the issue raised involved the trial court's failure to document that it considered
the sentencing factors of R.C. §2929.12 in Assignment of Error #9 and the Consecutive
nature of the Aggravated Robbery convictions and Felonious AssauEt convictions were
allied offenses of similar import. The matter that Petitioner's convictions for three
counts of Aggravated Robbery that occurred under the same animus were never
raised. Ohio Law mandates that crimes perpetrated under the same animus must be
merged for sentencing purposes. The judgment of the trial court was affirmed on March
3, 2008. (See: Exhibit 1- Judgment Entry of the Eighth District Court of Appeals dated
March 7, 2007.)
6. On October 26, 2007, Petitioner filed a Motion for Post-Conviction Relief. Again the
matter of the Aggravating Robbery sentences were never raised. This Motion was
again filed by and through counsel. This Motion was summarily denied without a
hearing. This Motion was never appealed.(See: Exhibit 2 - Journal Entry denying
Motion for Post-Conviction relief dated December 14, 2007.)
7. Petitioner requested leave to file an Appeal in the Supreme Court of Ohio. This
Honorable Court denied leave on August 1, 2008.(See: Exhibit 3 - Supreme Court of
Ohio denial of Motion for Leave to hear appeal."
8. Petitioner filed a Motion for Leave to file a Motion New Triai on February 4, 2009. This
Motion was denied on May 11, 2009. The issues to be raised in this Motion were never
visited by the Court as the Motion was untimely. (See: Exhibit 4- Journal Entry denying
Motion)
9. Petitioner then filed, pro se, a Motion to Set Aside Sentence on August 28, 2009. Once
again this motion was summarily denied without a hearing and without reaching the
issued raised as the Motion was untimely. (See. Exhibit 5-- Journal Entry dated
September 1, 2009.)
10. Petitioner then attempted, pro se, to reopen his direct appeal on March 28, 2011. This
appeal was dismissed as a duplicate appeal and the issues raised were never
addressed by the court. (See: Exhibit C- Journal Entry denying Motion to vacate or set
aside dated September 1, 2009.)
11. Petitioner now moves this Honorable Court to grant his Petition for a Writ of habeas
Corpus as his sentence is contrary to law and is void ab initio.
LAWAND AliGI1tVIE.NT
THE TRIAL COURT'VIOLATEI3 PETITIONER'S 5TH, 6, AND 14TH CONSTITUTIONALRIGHTS BY SENTENCING PETITIONER TO CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES FORCOUNTS 1, 3, & 4 WHEN THE OFFENSES WERE COMMITTED WITH THE SAMECOURS E(,1F CONDUCT AND ANIMUS AND WERE THEREFORE ALLIED OFFENSESOF SIMILAR IMPOt'''a7;,
12. In State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, ¶ 44, the Supreme Court
of Ohio held that, in determining whether two offenses are allied offenses of similar
import, "the conduct of the accused must be considered" The court must first
determine "whether it is possible to commit one offense and commit the other with the
same conduct, " and, if so, then "the court must determine whether the offenses were
committed by the same conduct, i.e. 'a single act, committed with a single state of
mind"' (Emphasis sic) Id. at ¶ 48, 49, quoting State v Brown, 119 Ohio St.3d
447, 2008-Ohio-4569, ¶ 50 (Lanzinger, J, concurring). If the same conduct constituted
both offenses, then they must be merged. Johnson at 150. Failure to merge allied
offenses of similar import constitutes plain error, and prejudice exists even where a
defendant's sentences are to run concurrently because "a defendant is prejudiced by
having more convictions than are authorized by law." State v. Underwood, 124 Ohio
St.3d 365, 2616-Ohio-1, ¶ 31.
13. Upon reviewing the transcript from the seE :'r.enf ro hearing, there is no indication that
the trial court considered Johnson and the issue of merger. See State V. Chisholm, 9th
Dist. No. 26007, 2012-Ohio-3932, ¶ 21. When the trial court pronounced Petitioner's
consecutive sentences of five years on the aggravated robbery convictions in Counts
1, 3, and 4,, he did not object to the trial court`s failure to merge these offenses.
However, Petitioner is not precluded from making this argument here, even though no
discussion proceeded below as to "whether the offenses can be and were committed
by the same conduct." See State v. Brautigam, 9th Dist. No. 26134, 2012-Ohio-2599,
¶ 8, citing Underwood at paragraph one of the syllabus, (holding that a defendant may
make an allied offense argument ...!), and Johnson at ¶ 49.
14.1IVhen considering the conduct of Petitioner, as must be done in this case, it is clear
that the offenses were committed in the same course of conduct, at the same time and
with the same animus.
15. R.C. 2941.25 reads as follows: "(A) Vlihere the same conduct by defendant can be
construed to constitute two or more allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or
information may contain counts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be
convicted of only one.
16. The failure of the trial court to follow the mandates of 2941:25 violates Petitioner's
Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth amendment rights to due process of law and equal
protection.
Conclusion
17. For the reasons set forth above, Petitioner avers that his sentence is illegal ab initio.
That the manner in which his sentences were ordered into execution is repugnant to
the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and
therefore violates Petitioner's Constitutional Rights. Ergo, Petitioner moves this
Honorable Court for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Respectfully Submitted,
Sam Thomas IIE, Esq. (0067848)21403 Chagrin Blvd. Suite 295Beachwood, Ohio 44122;216) 229-1521 Cell(216) 357-3300 Office
APPENDIX
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas EXhibit No:
THE STATE OF OHIO A TRUE BILL INDICTMENT FORvs.
SHAWN CAL#.INS
DATE
AGGRAVATED ROBBEFtY R.C. 2911.01 w/cts
THE TERM OF ( CASE NO. I COUNT
September 1, 2006 1 SEPTEMBER OF 2006 1 CR 488472 1 1
The State of Oiil®' CRO6488472-A 42335708
CUYAHOGA COUNTY SS. I Inili 11111111111 II(tl Hlu i^^!! Ilill I1l1111! N1The Jurors of the Grand Jury of the State of Ohio, within and for the body of the County aforesaid, on their oaths, IN THE
NAME AND BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF OHIO, Do find and present, that the above named Defendanttsl, an or
about the date of the offense set forth above, in the County of Cuyahoga, unlawfully
did, in attempting or committing a theft offense, as defined in Section 2913.01 of the
Revised Code, or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense upon Gerald
Henderson, have a.deadly weapon to-wit: gun/firearm, on or about his person or under his
control and either displayed the weapon, brandished it, indicated that he possessed it, or
used it
i`IREARM sPECIFICATI{}N - 1 YEAR (2941 .141 )
The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had a firearm on or
about his person or under his control while committing the offense.
FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 3 YEARS (2941.145)
The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had a firearm on or
about his person or under his control while committing the offense and displayed the
firearm, brandished the firearm, indicated that he possessed the firearm, or used it to
facilitate the offe'nse.
t^r°,I i/ ^U4U
... ... .. .. .'L:.:... ^
^^'.^ . -- . . . - .. . .. . .... .
contra to the form of th statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and djgnity of the State of Ohio<
'eK
Foreman of the Grand Jury Prosecuting Attorney
666
INDICTMENT - ORIGINAL
0 Cuyahoga County Common Pleas
THE STATE OF OHIOvs.
SHAWN COLLINS
DATE OF OFFENSE
A TRUE BILL INDICTMENT FOR
AGGRAVATED ROBBERY R.C. 2911.01
E TERM CASE NO.
September 1, 2006 1 SEPTEMBER OF 2006 1 CR 488472 1 2
The State of Ohio,CUYAHOGA COUNTY SS`
The Jurors of the Grand Jury of the State of Ohio, within and for the body of the County aforesaid, on their oaths, IN THENAME AND BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF OHtq, Do find and present, that the above named Defendant(s), on or
about the date of the offense set forth above, in the County of Cuyahoga, unlawfully
did, in attempting or committing a theft offense, as defined in Section 2913.01 of the
Revised Code, or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense upon Gerald Henderson
Anthony Henderson, inflict, or attempt to inflict serious physical harm on Gerald
Henderson
FIREARM SPECIFICATIt3N - 1 YEAR (2941.141)
The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had a firearm on or
about his person or under his control while committing the offense.
FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 3 YEARS (2941.145)
The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had a firearm on or
about his person or under his control while committing the offense and displayed the
firearm, brandished the firearm, indicated that he possessed the firearm, or used it to
facilitate the offense.
contrar o the form of the atute in sucnc case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Ohio,
Foreman of t e Grand Jury Prosecuting Attorney
568
1NDiCTMENT - ORIGINAL
DATE
* Cuyahoga County Common Pleas 0
THE STATE OF OHIOvs.
A TRUE BILL 4NDlCTMENT FOR
SHAWN COLLINS
THE TERM OF CASE CtO. COUNT
September 1, 2006 1 SEPTEMBER OF 2006 1 CR 488472 1 3
The State of ahio, ss.CUYAHOGA COUNTY
The Jurors of the Grand Jury of the State of Ohio, within and for the body of the County aforesaid, on their oaths, IN THENAME AND BY THE AUTHORiTY OF THE STATE OF OHIO, Do find and present, that the above named Defendant(s), on or
about the date of the offense set forth above, in the County of Cuyahoga, uniawfutly
did, in attempting or committing a theft offense, as defined in Section 2913.01 of the
Revised Code, or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense upon Anthony
Henderson, have a deadly weapon to-wit: gun/firearm, on or about his person or under his
control and either displayed the weapon, brandished it, indicated that he possessed it, or
used it
PIREAR4 SPECIF7CATa0N - 1 YEAR (2941.141)
The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had a firearm on or
about his person or under his control while committing the offense.
FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 3 YEARS (2941.145)
The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had a firearm on or
about his person or under his control while committing the offense and displayed the
firearm, brandished the firearm, indicated that he possessed the firearm, or used it to
facilitate the offense.
con to the form of th statute in fucft case made and provic{ed, and against the peace and dignity of the State oi Ohio.,
A%6@1ZForeman of the Grand Jury Prosecuting Attorney
068
AGGRAVATED ROBBERY R.C. 2911.01
lNDPCTMENT - ORiCaINAL
° 0 Cuyahoga Ccunty Common Pleas
THE STATE OF OHIO A TRUE BILL (NDIa;TMENT FORvs.
SHAWN COLLINS
OF OFFENSE
AGGRAVATEiJ ROBBERY R.C. 2911.01
THE TERM OF I CASE NO. I COUNT
September 1, 2006 1 SEPTEMBER OF 2006 ( CR 488472 I 4
The State of Ohio, ss.CUYAHOGA COUNTY
The Jurors of the Grand Jury of the State of Ohio, within and for the body of the County aforesaid, on their oaths, IN THENAME AND BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF OHIO, Do find and present, that the above named Defendant(s), on orabout the date of the offense set forth above, in the County of Cuyahoga, uniawfuily
did, in attempting or committing a theft offense, as defined in Section 2913,01 of the
Revised Code, or in fleeing immediately after the attempt or offense upon Anthony
Henderson, inflict, or attempt to inflict serious physical harm on Anthony Henderson
FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 1 YEAR (2941.141)
The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had a firearm on or
about his person or under his control while committing the offense.
FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 3 YEARS (2941.145)
The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had a firearm on or
about his person or under his control while committing the offense and displayed the
firearm, brandished the firearm, indicated that he possessed the firearm, or used it to
facilitate the offense.
>^o the form of the atute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and digniey of the State of Ohio.
Foreman of the Grand Jury Prosecuting Attorney
868
INDICTMENT - ORIGINAL
^ Cuyahoga County Common Pleas
THE STATE OF OHIO A TRUE BILL INDICTMENT FORvs.
SHAWN COLLINS FELONIOUS ASSAULT R.C. 2903.11
DATE OF OFFENSE ?HE iERM OF T--- CASE Np. COUNT
September 1, 2006 SEPTEMBER OF 2006 CR 488472 5
The State of Ohio, ssCUYAfI(?GA COUNTY
The Jurors of the Grand Jury of the State of Ohio, within and for the body of the County aforesaid, on their oaths, IN THENAME AND BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF OHlQ, Do find and present, that the above named Defendant(s), on orabout the date of the offense set forth above, in the County of Cuyahoga, unlawfully
and knowingly did cause or attempt to cause physical harm to Anthony Henderson by means of
a deadly weapon or dangerous ordnance, to-wit: gun/firearm, as defined in Section 2923.11
of the Revised Code
FIRF-ARM SPECIFICATION - 1 YEAR (2941 .141 )
The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had e:firearm on or
about his person or under his control while committing the offense.
FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 3 YEARS (2941.145)
The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had a firearm on or
about his person or under his control while committing the offense and displayed the
firearm, brandished the firearm, indicated that he possessed the firearm, or used it to
facilitate the offense,
contraty o the form of the s tute in such case made and provided, and galnst the peaee and dignity of the 5tate of ®hio.
/41Foreman of the Grand Jury Prosecuting Attorney
668
INaICTMENT - ORIGINAL
I Illlil Illli lllll IIIII f I(il 111111111! {IIII Illl 1111 1 IlII43653432
Exhibilt No:
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEASCUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
THE S"TATE OF OHIOPlaintiff
Case No: CR-06-488472-A
Judge: SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD
SHAWN COLLINSDefendant INDICT: 2911.01 AGGRAVATED ROBBERY /FRM i/FRM3
2911.01 AGGRAVATED ROBBERY /FRM 1 /FRM32911.01 AGGRAVATED ROBBERY lFRM 1/FRM3ADDITIONAL COUNTS.,,
JOTJRNAL ENTRY
DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH COUNSEL MARTIN BAKER. PROSECUTI1tiTG ATTORNEY MICHAEL P. GRA.HAIVIPRESENT.COURT REPORTER PRESENT.THE JURY RETURNS A VERDICT OF GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 2911.01 -F1. WITH FIREARMSPECIFICATION - t YEAR (2941.141), FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 3 YEARS (2941,145) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 3,4 OF THE 1NDICTMENT.THE JURY RBTURNS A VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 2911.01 - WITH FIREARMSPECIFICATION - I YEAR (2941.141), FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 3 YEARS (2941.145) AS CHARGED IN COL'NT(S) 2 OFTHE INDICTMENT,THE JURY RETURNS A VERDICT OF GUILTY OF FELONIOUS ASSAULT 2903.11 - F2 WITH FIREARM SPECIFICATION -1 YEAR (2941.141), FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 3 YEARS (2941.145) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 5 OF THEINDICTMENT.DEFENDANT ADDRESSES THE COURT.THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF THE LAW.THE COURT FINDS THAT PRISON IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSE OF R. C. 2929.11.THE COURT IMPOSES A PRISON SENTENCE AT THE LORAIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OF 23 YEAR(S),(3 YEARS ON FIREARM SPECIFICATIONS TO BE SERVED PRIOR TO AND CONSECUTIVE TO 5 YEARS ON EACH OFCOUNTS 1, 3, 4 AND 5. COUNT TO RUN CONSECUTIVE TO EACH OTHER FOR A TOTAL OF 23 YEARS).POST RELEASE CONTROI. IS PART OF THIS PRISON SENTENCE FOR 5 YEARS FOR THE ABOVE FELONY(S) L'NDERR.C.2967.28.THE DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO PAY A FINE IN THE SUM OF $ 1,000.00..(250,00 ON EACH OF COU'NTS 1, 3, 4 AND 5 FOR A TOTAL OF $1,000,00).DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS.DEFENDANT REMANDED.SHERIFF ORDERED TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT SHAWN COLLINS, DOB: 05/11/1990, GENDER: MALE, RACE:BLACK.
02/02/2007CPSAM 02
SENT02/02/200
CNE STATE OF ONEO ^ 1, THE CLERK OF T4L GOUR'C
Cu ^!^aqa Count SS. 0FCOMMON FLEAS WtTttiN
y' Y AtdD rOR' A'i COEI4TY,
HEREBYOEP.Ti¢YTHAT'fR'EA° V".AEnf^r:;N^!aTBli Y
Ai^ AhC CE3pl L^ rT0'• YkF. +^C ?' .^d,^^^.:,..... ......^
YV Otv FEi,E J3
WIl{^ES v '^A1^1i II5hi1 •.ik:Ml 0 r^i^j^l^T^^IJ-.-.
DAY OF^^'^u-'r0'^._. A 0 ]n ^
CtI.YAHOGA C:OtaNI"4 Y C;l.Ei?1C,qF COURTS
By
r....
{. rri77---Zk
^'" '-zA(. ^e ®
Judge Signature D ^
1-3 O r-C- r*1
;X)
.1^
, Deputy^ ^ .̂^t-t►.^..^ ^i.,- Gs^:.r^.."
^ Pagelofl
THE STATE OF OHIOPlaintiff
SHAWN COLLINSDefandant
Guyehoga County
JOURNAL ENTRY
09i28:45
THE STATE OF (TFf10 ^
^._
y}.^
..-1
DEFENDANT IN COURT WiTII COUIVSEI, MARTIN [3AKER, PROSECUTING A'I"1'OItNEY MICHAEI:, P. GRAHAMPRESENT.COURT REPORTER PRESENT.THE 3URY RETURNS A VERDICT OF GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 2911,01 - F I WITH FIREARMSPECIFICA"ITON - 1 YEAR (2941,141), FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 3 YEARS (2941.145) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 1, 3,4 OF THE INDICTMENT,Tl-TE JURY RETURNS A VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY OF AGGRAVATED ROBBERY 2911.01 - WITH FIREARMSPECIFICATION - I YEAR (2941.141), FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 3 YEARS (2941.145) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 2 OFTHE INDICTMENT.THE .I1.lRY RETURNS A VERDICT OF GUILTY OF FELONIOUS ASSAULT 2903.11 - F2 WITii FIREARM SPECIFICATION -I YEAR (2941.141), FIREARM SPECIFICATION - 3 YEARS (2941,145) AS CHARGED IN COUNT(S) 5 OF THFINDICTMENT.DEFENDANT' ADDRESSES THE COURT.THE COURT CONSIDERED ALL REQUIRED FACTORS OF TIiE LAW.THE COURT FINDS THA7' PRISON IS CONSISTENT V+'ITIi TfiE PURPOSE OF R. C. 2929.11,TI-IE COURT IMPOSES A PRISON S$NTENCE AT THE LORAIN COItRECTIONAL LNSTITUTION OF 23 YEAR(S).(3 YEARS ON FIREA:R.M SPECIFICATIONS TO BE SERVED PRIOR TO AND CONSECUTIVE TO 5 YEARS ON EACH OFCOUNTS 1, 3,4 AND 5. COUNT TO RUN CONSECU"fIVE TO EACH OTHER FOR A TOTAL OF 23 YEARS).POST RELEASE CONTROL IS PART OF THIS PRISON SENTENCE.FOR 5 YEARS FOR THE ABOVE FELONY(S) UNDERR<C:2967.28.THE DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO PAY A FIi IE IN THE SUM OF S 1,000.00.(250.00 ON EACH OF COUNTS 1, 3, 4 AND 5 FOR A TOTAL OF S 1,000.00).DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COURT COSTS.DEEEINDANT REMANDED.SHERIFF ORDERGD TO TRANSPORTDEFENLIANT SHAWN COLLINS, DOB: 05/11/1990, GENDER: MALE, RACE:
t`"BLA^iC.
^CPSA•1C^f^^ri^.
i ^ A L,t )
r r'
S^7
SFN'C02'02/2007
Case No: CR-06-488472-A
Judge: SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD
INI)1C:T: 2911.01 AGGRAVAl'ED RO86EitY IFRMI lFRMl2911.01 AGGRAVATED ROBBERY /FRh9I lFRFvt32911 .01 AGGRAVATED ROBBERY fFRMi /FRM3ADDITIONAL COUNTS...
1. THE CLERK OF Tr'*:f^(Qti[C,tJMMON , ^ i atuAND FOR SAIu GG
NEFiEBY CEfiTtlr r't $t 1 r AND FOF- C0!1^G 1S TRUL-K AhD CO(^^1 jG^$` ^^n'Gln ri !
N ON FILE IN lefY i.li?':v:F.VATNESS MY tIP h;7 At'i ':Ac. O"r c"s ,iD CQURT T ItISpAYOF wA D 2a^
GL)YAHOGA aUN1'Y CLERK OF COURTS
^Y..^ Deputy
'^ +d
^Datt'
'^
%_;:^^•c `^, UV^ t W
J*
D-OL", Gst-kz-PagelufI
I CERTIFY the above ':o be a true copy of the sA ' i ' dJrxdgre:arat iacl Senten,ce t33,vsn under my h rrd and ,seaa^.
^oiE said " L^c,̂ u.rt this ^ day of
UR^^7G^^RAi,D R. FUERST, C1:^'r?^f By13epu t
Pursuaint to.the withxn , order and sentence of the Couact, 2.,, did c8rkey thewithin raamed , to oii,, , a.Ot17
GERALD T. MCPAIIL, Sheriff, By Deputy: Sherif£
Exhibit No:Ifllfll!!IlIIII[Ililllllllll;llllillll^lll((I(III! IlIII -
43653432
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEASCUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
i• . : "" .
•
}
^
7
9
1 0
11
12
13
^ 14
15
-..__...._ .._._..:...__._......1.6.
17
18
^ 19
20t......... .
21
.22
23
24
25
Exhibit NO: ^.D-----^-.--___
611
in this case, we want to express our. appreciation.
THE BAILIFF: Thank you, Judge.
All rise, please.
(Thereupon, the jury'was excused.)
(Thereupon, the following proceedings were
had in open court out of the presence of the jury:)
THE BA.ILIFF:. Be seated.
Uo you want to approach the podium with your
"client?
MR. BAKER: I'm sorry, your Honor?
THE DEPUTY: Approach the podium.
MR. BAKER:. Oh, o kay .
THE COURT: Mr. Collins, the jury of your
peers, having,found you guilty, counaelor, is there
anything that you' d.like to say?
MR o BAKER: . Your Honor, -I know, beside-s the
jury, I know the Court was paying attention.
Obviously, we're disappointed in the verdict. We ° d
like the Court to remember that he is only 16 years
old. He's been punished for what
THE COURT: Wait a second. Before we even
start that, don't start about him being 16. But
before we.even impaneled this jury, I begged you to
talk to the prosecutor because of his delicate age
and try to work something out. They offered him
OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERSCUYAHUGA COUNTY, OHIO
612
id
7
8
9
10
i 11
12
E ;. 13
14
1.5
. - _._ 1.6.
17
18
19
20
21
-22
23
24
25
four years, and you and your client turned it down.
MR. BAKER: Your Honor, that's not correct..
I didn't turn it down. My client, in conjunction
with his mother, turned it down. I don't make the
decision for my clients. They make the decision.
We spent about an hour and a half sitting at'that
table going over all of his rights and rrty
reconmen.dation.
THE COURT: I know one thing. I made a
diligent effort, Iaecause he was 16 years of age,
because of all of the indications far what the facts
niay have been, I made a diligent effort to have.you
talk to the prosecutor. It wa.s a concerted effort
just to get you to talk to the,prosecutor.. Yau carne.
here on trial day and never even.talked to the
prosecutor< You got a 16-year-old charged with five
first degree felonies. You never even talked-to the
prosecutor abaut it. .
MR. BAKERa Your Honor, thates not correct.
THE COURT: Well, you never talked to him.
about any negotiations. So before you put on the
record that he's 16, he's delicate, you know, he's a
young age and all that, I want to be very, very
speca.fi.c. I asked you any number of times to please
talk to the prosecutor because there were
OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERSCUYAHOGA CoUNTY, OHIO
i^ -..i . 1
2
3
4
5
^
7
8
9
10
11
12
13^ ^ .
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
.22
23
24
25
613
indications of gang activity, there were- incl.ications
of guns, there were indications of all kinds of
things, and I told you to talk to the prosecutor.
MR. BAKER: Your Honor, if it makes any
difference, my rec -- they asked me my
recommendation. My recommendation was that`he take
the,p2ea bargain. He refused it. That's his
constitutional rigiat.
THE COURT: Oh, sure. That's-true. I'm not
saying that that's not true. You're absolutely
r.i ght .
MR. BAKER: And I want -- the only reason I
mentioned his age, obvio°asly, you're gonna' be
sentencing this man for a period of time. You know
his age. I just wanted to bring it up. I at least
want you to consider his age before you pronounce
your sentence.
THE COURT : Mr. Collins, is the,re arlyth.ihc}
that you'd like to say?
So you want him to be sentenced now?.
_ __..__ _...,..__.... .._. . _:-.:._ .- - _..: _ - ___ ...._._. ._......._ _... _:. _.__..__..:___.._ . ._.:__ ...:... .MR. B.AKER: Yes, your Honor.
THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Collins, is there
anything that you'd like to say? , .
THE DEFENDANT: Yes. I ain't do it.
THE COURT : I'm ---- a j ury of your peers has
OFFICIAI, COURT REPORTERSCUYAHOGA COt3].TTTY, OHIO
E'
Q
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14. . ^
15
.: . ._. ._ _..... _. .. . ..:. . ._: _ l 6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
614
just found you guilty, so we know you did it.
The aggravated robbery in Count No. 1 is a
felony of the first degree --
MR:. GR:AHAM: Yes, your Hanor.
THE COURT: -- or second degree? . '
MR. GRAHAM: First degree.
THE COURT: The felonious assault is a
felony 1 or 2?
MR. GRAHAM: Second degree, your Honor.
THE COURT: So he got convicted of two --
three -- no. One, two, three felony on:es and one
felony 2.
MR.. GRRHAM: That's correct, your Honor.
THE COURT: You know,.I --- anything fuxther
you want to say'3
MR.e._. BAKER-..-..- No,- your I-Ionor.. . .
THE COURTo On each of the felony on.es, the
sentence wi1.1, be the sam.e : 250 and costs, five
years at the Lorain Correctional Institu:tion_
They' ll be eonsecuta.ve.
On the felonious assaults, which is a felony'
of the second degree, the sentence of the Court-is
250 and costs, five years at the Lorain Correctional
Institution. It'll be consecutive, for 20 years.
THE BAILIFF: Judge, we have gun
OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERSCUYAHOGA COUNTY, ORIO
,• .
. ----_. 7
..
4
6
7
8
^
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20__ _..
21.
22
23
24
25f i
615
specifications on all of them.
THE COLSItT : That 'l1 be plus °three years for -
t,he gun specifications. So it will be 23 years.
THE BAILIFF: Thank you, Judge> -
(Proceedings concluded 3o10 p.m.) -
i i
E3FFICIAT, COURT REPORTERSCUYAHaGA COUNTY, OHIO
y
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
a. a.
12
13.
14
15
........... . _-.___ _...._>_....._.... 16
17
18
19
20
21
.22
23
24
25
C E R T I F I CA T E
I, Deborah L. Kracht, an Official Court
Reporter. for the Court of Common P1eas, Cuyahoga
County, Ohio, do hereby certify that I am employed
as az3. Official Court Reporter, and I took down in
stenotypy all of the proceedings had in'the
above-entitled cause; that I have transcribed my
said stenotype notes into typewritten form, as
appears in the foregoing Transcript of
Proceedings; that said transcript is a complete
record of the proceedings had in the said cause,
and constitutes a true and correct Transcript of
Proceedings had therein.
De ora L: KrachtOtticial. Court ReporterCuyahoga County, Ohio '
OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERSCUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO