14
: . Ð - : , , , , 14 2009

Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

��������� ��: ������� �. ��������� ������������ ����� ����������������������� ����������� ���������� �������������� - ������ ��

��������: ��� �������� ��� ��� ����� �������������������� ������� ������������� ������, ������, ����������������, ��������, ���

����� 14 2009

Page 2: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

• Proposal & Objectives– Interstitial Floors– Facade Redesign– Mechanical Relocation

• Building Background– Quick facts– Systems– Features

• Proposed Interstitial Floor Solution– Common Solution– Staggered Truss Integration– Removable Panel Design

– Concept– Design– Specifications

• Mechanical Relocation– Sizing– Ductwork

• Facade Design• Construction Schedule• Conclusion• Acknowledgements

2Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

Page 3: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

• Develop the most effective interstitial floor design for the B3C

• Provide  structural insight to the design• Determine the effects of the new floor system on other systems of the building. 

• Discover how structural systems may improve the sustainable aspects of the B3C

3Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

Page 4: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

• Size– Building square footage ‐ 530,000 sqft

• 162,300 sqft of patient bed space• 45,900 sqft of mechanical space• 114,900 sqft of procedural space

– Building height ‐ 180 ft• 10 stories above grade• 4 stories below grade

• Steel System– Moment Frame

• Exterior  “Tube” structure

– Sizes• Spanning 30ft on average up to 42 ft• Story heights generally 15ft• Sizes ranging form W10 to w36

• Floor Systems– Composite Steel Decking

• Lateral force transferring diaphragm

– Precast Hollow core• Lower levels to allow access for crane

• Facade • Material types

4Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

Page 5: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

• Commonly in laboratories and hospitals• Lightweight concrete floors• Low floor to floor heights• Allows for maximum space flexibility

5

• Staggered truss design to reduce number of moment connections

• Hide the systems of the building

Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

Page 6: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

• Steel Frame• Rectangular HSS members• Tension members

• Floor Panels• Concore 2x2 panels

• Benefits • Ease of access to ceiling plenum

6Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

Page 7: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

• Panel Choices– All Steel– Concore

• Rack Design– Supports spaced at 6 feet– HSS vs T shape

7Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

• Support Choices– Beams vs HSS– HSS vs T Shape

• Tension Members– Steel Rod vs Cable– Cost and flexibility

Page 8: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

• Space to contain larger mechanical equipment• Isolation of air plenums

8Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

Page 9: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

• Looping maintained• Duct length decreased• Air quality increased• Still accessible through stairwell

9Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

Page 10: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

• Desired properties– Light emittance– Insulating properties

• Physical characteristics– Emphasized floors– Reference to surrounding buildings

10Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

Facade Material ComparisonSystem Square Footage Cost per Square foot ($) CostGlass Facade 160000 36.95 $  5,912,000.00 

Glass & Metal Panel 160000 $  3,965,760.00 Glass 96000 36.95 $  3,547,200.00 

Metal 64000 6.54 $      418,560.00 

Facade Type Total Square Footage Weight (lb/sqft) Total Weight (lbs)All Glass 1600001/4" 3.27 5232001/2" 6.54 1046400

Glass and Metal 160000 7251201/2" Glass 96000 6.54 627840

Metal 64000 1.52 97280

Page 11: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

• Concurrent trade work can be achieved • Time savings in the most time consuming portion of the schedule

• Time savings is equal to cost savings

11Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

Normal Schedule

One day Concurrent

Two days Concurrent

Three days Concurrent

60.7152.04

43.3734.69

Weeks to complete Mechanical and Interior Fitout

Weeks

Page 12: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

• Most effective interstitial floor system for the B3C project is the removable panel system

• Mechanical and facade systems were affected by integration of interstitials

• Structural changes can make a positive impact on the sustainability of a building

12Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

Page 13: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

Thanks go out to:Dr. Boothby NBBJ  especially Pam HolmesPenn State friends, AE colleagues, and 419 friendsKate Family for their support 

13Proposal & Objectives Building Background Interstitial Floor Solution Mechanical Relocation Facade Redesign Construction Schedule Conclusions Acknowledgements

Page 14: Objectives - Pennsylvania State University · – HSS vsT Shape • Tension Members – Steel Rod vs Cable – Costand flexibility • Space to contain larger mechanical equipment

14