Upload
joella-may
View
216
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OVERVIEW OF AB 484
CALIFORNIA MEASUREMENT OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND PROGRESS (CALMAPP)
Assessment and Testing
CTA State Council, October 2013
Vernon G. Gettone, Staff Consultant Report
TABLE THINK, TABLE TALK! At your table, pick a
partner and introduce yourself.
Tell one another something you already know about AB 484.
Then share a question you have about the new law.
OVERVIEW OF ASSEMBLY BILL 484 (BONILLA)
Governor signed AB 484 into law October 2, 2013. The intent of the legislation to provide a system with the primary purpose of:Assisting teachers, administrators, pupils
and their parentsImproving teaching and learningPromoting high-quality teaching and
learning using a variety of assessment approaches and item types
OVERVIEW OF AB 484
Establishes the California Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress (CalMAPP) assessment system
CalMAPP system replaces the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program
Provisions of AB 484 take effect January 1, 2014
OVERVIEW OF AB 484
Prohibits the use of the 2013–14 field test results for accountability purposes
Prohibits the comparison of results from the consortium summative assessments and California Standards Tests (CSTs)
OVERVIEW OF AB 484
Provides the State Superintendent, with the approval of the SBE, the authority to determine if API scores would be a valid measure of school and district performance in the 2013–14 and 2014–15 school years only
OVERVIEW OF AB 484 Provides alternatives for schools and
districts that do not receive an API to meet legislative requirements in one of the following ways:Use the most recent APIUse an average of the three most recent annual
API calculationsUse alternative measures that show increases in
pupil academic achievement school-wide and for all student groups
OVERVIEW OF AB 484
AYP for Elementary and Middle Schools: In addition to double-testing flexibility,
the U.S. Department of Education (ED) is also providing states with determination flexibility
IMPACT OF AB 484 ON ACCOUNTABILITY
AYP for Elementary and Middle Schools: Determination flexibility allows the 2014
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) reports to reflect the 2013 AYP results. Schools currently in Program Improvement (PI) will maintain their current status and will not be required to implement any new PI activities. (New schools will not be identified for PI.)
IMPACT OF AB 484 ON ACCOUNTABILITY (CONT)
API for Elementary and Middle Schools:The State Superintendent will take a
recommendation to the SBE regarding whether or not to suspend elementary and middle school API reports in spring 2014
IMPACT OF AB 484 ON ACCOUNTABILITY (CONT)
API High Schools: Since the California High School Exit
Examination (CAHSEE) will be administered during 2013–14, the CDE could produce API reports for high schools. The API could be based on:
Grade 10 CAHSEE and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics
Grade 10 CST, CMA, and CAPA Life Science
IMPACT OF AB 484 ON ACCOUNTABILITY (CONT)
The change to the calculation methodology of the high school API is pending a recommendation by the State Superintendent and approval by the SBE
HIGH SCHOOL 2014 AYP AND PI REPORTS
2014 AYP determinations will be made for high schools based on the 2014 CAHSEE and CAPA ELA and mathematics results
High schools may be identified or advanced in PI based on 2014 AYP results
2013–14 BUDGET BILL
The Budget Bill (AB 97) amended Education Code Section 52052, which makes the following changes to the API: Reduces the numerically-significant
student group threshold to 30 students
2013–14 BUDGET BILL (CONT)
Adds foster youth as a new student group to the API, with a student group size of 30
Requires districts to receive and meet API Growth targets
SUBJECTS AND GRADES ASSESSED IN CALMAPP
2013-14 SCHOOL YEAR
(Smarter Balanced Field Test) – English Language Arts & Mathematics, grades 3-8 & 11.
Grade-level science assessments – CSTs (California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA), California Modified Assessment (CMA), grades 5, 8 and 10.
CAPA for ELA & Mathematics, grades 2-11 Voluntary grade 11 – Early Assessment
Program (EAP), ELA & Mathematics
CALMAPP RESULTS COMPARED TO STAR RESULTS
AB 484 prohibits comparison of CALMAPP assessment results with STAR assessment results
SMARTER BALANCED FIELD TEST
Purpose: Ensure assessment items are available to
all students Produce results that are valid, reliable, and
fair Test performance of over 20,000 newly
developed test items Populate the test item bank Place on accurate scale to determine final
achievement levels (cut-scores)
SMARTER BALANCED SPRING 2013 PILOT TEST INFLUENCE THE FT
Pilot Test informed the development of the FTOverall test designEstimated student testing timeTest and item directions Item specificationsDisplay of test items, including associated
pictures, graphs or other materialsScoring rubrics
SMARTER BALANCED SPRING 2014 FIELD TEST
• Will take place March 18–June 6, 2014. Shorter windows within this time frame will be assigned to schools by the CDE and ETS.
• Will assess students in grades 3 through 11.
– Grades 3–8: All students are expected to participate.– Grades 9 and 10: Only students selected for the
scientific sample are expected to participate.– Grade 11:* Students selected for the scientific sample
are expected to participate; all others may participate.
* All grade 11 students may participate in the Early Assessment Program.
BENEFITS OF SPRING 2014 FIELD TEST
Students, teachers & administrators will receive valuable exposure to and experience with the future assessment system
Students will gain hands-on experience with the: functionality of innovative technology-enhanced
itemsnewly designed performance tasks with related
classroom activities
BENEFITS OF SPRING 2014 FIELD TEST
Teachers and administrators will gain valuable experience with administrators logistics
LEAs will benefit from learning where their technology gaps may be
California will benefit by having the diversity of its student population included in the analysis of test item quality and development of achievement level scores and descriptors
FIELD TEST SCHEDULE
The FT will be conducted across Smarter Balanced member states between March 18 and June 6, 2014.
WHO WILL TAKE THE FIELD TEST?
Students across Smarter Balanced member will be selected to participate in the scientific sample of the FT
Students will take the FT either in mathematics or English Language Arts
California students will make up approximately 36% of the overall scientific sample
CDE and ETS will select 681,000 students in grades 3 through 11 for the FT
MORE ON THE FIELD TEST The only students who will not be sampled
for the FT are those who take the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA)
Smarter Balanced Usability, Accessibility and Accommodations Guidelines provides a list of available tools, supports and accommodations
LEAs cannot volunteer to be included in the scientific sample of the FT. The sample will be determined by the CDE and ETS
THERE IS MORE ON THE FIELD TEST
Item Types Included in the Field Test Multiple-choice Matching Fill-in tables Drag and drop Graphing Short text and long essay Each FT will include a performance task
AGAIN, THERE IS MORE ON FIELD TEST
Schools will not be able to select the content area(s). They will be assigned to field test either ELA or mathematics
Schools have the options of paying for their students to take both subject areas during FT
The FT will not be adaptive Students will encounter the same mix of
content, item types and cognitive complexity that will be presented on the 2015 operational test
AND MORE FIELD TEST There will be no paper-and-pencil version of
the FT The FT is strictly a computer-based modality During the operational assessments that
begin in the 2014-15 school year, a paper-and-pencil version will be available for up to three years
AND MORE ON FIELD TEST
How long will the FT take to administer? It will take approximately 3.5 hours per
grade, per content This is approximately the same length as
the operational assessments The FT is intended to be administered over
multiple sessions of about 45 minutes each FT may be administered in shorter or longer
sessions as appropriate for the students and the school
AND MORE ON THE FIELD TEST…
Minimum Technology Requirements for FT Design to operate within the technology
infrastructures in most schools Windows XP and Mac OS X 10.4.4 Smarter Balanced Technology Strategy
Framework and System Requirements Specifications: Technology page on the Smarter Balanced Web site
WAIT! THERE IS MORE ON FIELD TEST
An individual student, school or district score report will not be generated from the FT
A field test is not designed to be a valid and reliable measure of student achievement
FT is designed to help developers evaluate whether the tests, individual test items and the technology platform work as intended before the first operational administration
AB 484 prohibits the production of individual student scores from the FT
FT play no role in meeting state and/or federal accountability requirements