Upload
others
View
2
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Department of Social Services
Children's Division
Children's Services
Management Report
November 2015
Missouri Department of Social Services
Research & Data Analysis
221 W. High Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis Research and Data Analysis
State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement:
“To maintain or improve the quality of life for Missouri citizens." The Department of Social Services is an equal opportunity employer. Services provided by the Department of Social Services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis.
Children’s Services Management Report II Research and Data Analysis
Table of Contents
Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this publication is intended for monthly use only.
Although the information presented is the best available at the time of publication, because of delays in processing, data may be incomplete. Accordingly, data should NOT simply be summed from one month
to the next to obtain 3 month, 6 month or 12 month (etc.) values.
Figure 1. Map – Department of Social Services Regions ...............................................................V
Child Abuse and Neglect (CA/N)
Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During the Month Compared to Those
Reported for the Same Month Last Year ....................................................................... 2
Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During the Month ....................................................................................... 4
Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During the Month .................................................................. 6
Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month .................................. 8
Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ................................ 10
Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During the Month .......................................... 12
Figure 2. CA/N Reports for Four Years Through the Current Month ............................................ 14
Figure 3. CA/N Reports Comparing the Last Two Years.............................................................. 14
Figure 4. Percentage Change in CA/N Reports Made Twelve Months Apart ................................. 15
Figure 5. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 15
Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 16
Figure 7. Time Between Report and Child Contact for Investigations/Assessments
Completed in the Month ............................................................................................ 16
Figure 8. Percentage of Investigations/Assessments Completed Within Forty Five Days ............... 17
Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ............................................................... 18
Family-Centered Services (FCS)
Table 7. FCS Cases Open at the End of the Month by Reason for Opening ................................. 22
Table 8. FCS Cases Active During the Month by Reason for Opening ......................................... 24
Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During the Month ............................................... 26
Table 10. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 28
Children’s Services Management Report III Research and Data Analysis
Table 11. FCS Cases By Region Closed During the Month by Close Reason .................................. 30
Table 12. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had Court Involvement ...................... 32
Table 13. FCS Cases By Region Active During the Month Which Have Had No Court Involvement . 34
Figure 9. FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month Over the Previous Four Years .................. 36
Figure 10. Percentage Change in FCS Cases by Region Active as of the End of the Month,
Twelve Months Apart ................................................................................................ 36
Figure 11. FCS Cases by Region Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................... 37
Figure 12. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 37
Figure 13. FCS Cases by Region Closed During the Month by Reason for Closing .......................... 38
Figure 14. FCS Cases Active During the Month With Court Involvement By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 38
Figure 15. FCS Cases Active During the Month With No Court Involvement
By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 39
Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures .............................................................. 40
Out-of-Home Placement
Table 14. Children Entering Children’s Division Custody for the First Time During the Month
By Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ................................... 44
Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month by Case
Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ............................................... 46
Table 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Last Two Years ............... 48
Table 17. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by
Length of Stay and Region ........................................................................................ 49
Table 18. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month By Length of Stay and Case Manager County .............................................................. 50
Table 19. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Category ................................................................... 52
Table 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case
Manager County and Placement Type......................................................................... 54
Table 21. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by
Placement Category and Case Manager County........................................................... 64
Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System During the Month Grouped by Reason for Case Closing .......................................................................... 66
Children’s Services Management Report IV Research and Data Analysis
Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody ................................................................................ 68
Table 24. Currently Licensed Children’s Division Foster Homes by Vendor Type ........................... 70
Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Legal Status ................................................................. 72
Table 26. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped
By Case Manager County and Goal ............................................................................. 74
Table 27. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped
By Case Manager County and Number of Previous Placements..................................... 76
Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year .............................................................................. 78
Figure 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month ............................ 80
Figure 17. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month During
the Last Two Years ................................................................................................... 80
Figure 18. Children Closing from Alternative Care During the Month by Reason for Case Closing and Region ...................................................................................... 81
Figure 19. Adoptions Finalized During the Last Two Years ........................................................... 81
Figure 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last of the Month by Age and Placement Type ........................................................................................... 82
Figure 21. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last Day of the Month By Placement Category for Four Years ........................................................................ 82
Figure 22. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody by Quarter and
Subsequent Disposition ............................................................................................. 83
Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ............................................................... 84
Intensive In-Home Services (IIS)
Table 29. Families Referred to IIS During the Month Grouped by Referral County ........................ 90
Table 30. Families and Children Accepted in IIS During the Month Grouped by Household County ................................................................................................ 92
Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS During the Month .................................................... 94
Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ...................................................... 96
Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ................................................ 98
Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables ......................................................................... 100
Children’s Services Management Report V Research and Data Analysis
Figure 1. Department of Social Services Regions
Child Abuse and Neglect
Table 1.
Incidents and Children Reported During November 2015
Compared to Those Reported During November 2014
Current Incidents Current Children
Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change
Northwest Andrew 12 18 -33.33% 19 23 -17.39%
Atchison 2 3 -33.33% 2 4 -50.00%
Buchanan 123 106 16.04% 182 176 3.41%
Caldwell 7 12 -41.67% 10 18 -44.44%
Carroll 6 9 -33.33% 15 17 -11.77%
Cass 87 87 0.00% 104 113 -7.97%
Chariton 8 4 100.00% 14 6 133.33%
Clay 150 128 17.19% 197 190 3.68%
Clinton 15 23 -34.78% 22 35 -37.14%
Cooper 14 11 27.27% 16 20 -20.00%
Daviess 11 3 266.67% 20 3 566.67%
De Kalb 3 3 0.00% 4 5 -20.00%
Gentry 4 4 0.00% 4 6 -33.33%
Grundy 10 10 0.00% 16 16 0.00%
Harrison 9 7 28.57% 12 17 -29.41%
Holt 3 4 -25.00% 3 10 -70.00%
Johnson 40 25 60.00% 60 39 53.85%
Lafayette 30 29 3.45% 38 44 -13.64%
Linn 9 6 50.00% 15 7 114.29%
Livingston 10 11 -9.09% 16 18 -11.11%
Mercer 1 0 0.00% 1 0 0.00%
Nodaway 14 16 -12.50% 25 31 -19.36%
Pettis 42 60 -30.00% 54 88 -38.64%
Platte 46 43 6.98% 59 59 0.00%
Putnam 4 9 -55.56% 6 12 -50.00%
Ray 22 42 -47.62% 32 58 -44.83%
Saline 27 17 58.82% 34 23 47.83%
Sullivan 7 4 75.00% 10 6 66.67%
Worth 1 0 0.00% 1 0 0.00%
* Region Total * 717 694 3.31% 991 1,044 -5.08%
Northeast Adair 24 24 0.00% 38 32 18.75%
Audrain 46 31 48.39% 79 40 97.50%
Boone 147 123 19.51% 201 178 12.92%
Callaway 52 40 30.00% 78 61 27.87%
Clark 5 3 66.67% 8 3 166.67%
Cole 67 46 45.65% 85 62 37.10%
Franklin 110 87 26.44% 168 137 22.63%
Gasconade 11 10 10.00% 12 19 -36.84%
Howard 4 12 -66.67% 8 17 -52.94%
Jefferson 165 157 5.10% 232 229 1.31%
Knox 4 3 33.33% 4 4 0.00%
Lewis 8 11 -27.27% 15 13 15.39%
Lincoln 77 41 87.81% 124 66 87.88%
Macon 16 7 128.57% 22 8 175.00%
Marion 38 21 80.95% 54 31 74.19%
Monroe 5 3 66.67% 5 4 25.00%
Montgomery 18 8 125.00% 26 11 136.36%
Osage 4 10 -60.00% 6 13 -53.85%
Pike 24 9 166.67% 35 16 118.75%
Ralls 9 10 -10.00% 12 14 -14.29%
Randolph 30 29 3.45% 49 44 11.36%
Schuyler 5 6 -16.67% 6 11 -45.46%
Scotland 3 2 50.00% 4 3 33.33%
Shelby 5 5 0.00% 7 8 -12.50%
St Charles 208 213 -2.35% 279 303 -7.92%
Warren 45 27 66.67% 56 38 47.37%
* Region Total * 1,130 938 20.47% 1,613 1,365 18.17%
Southeast Bollinger 14 15 -6.67% 20 31 -35.48%
Butler 44 55 -20.00% 78 81 -3.70%
Cape Girardeau 75 50 50.00% 126 81 55.56%
Carter 9 1 800.00% 15 3 400.00%
Crawford 27 17 58.82% 41 25 64.00%
Dent 23 9 155.56% 32 14 128.57%
2Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 1.
Incidents and Children Reported During November 2015
Compared to Those Reported During November 2014
Current Incidents Current Children
Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change
Southeast Dunklin 44 30 46.67% 69 38 81.58%
Howell 67 46 45.65% 101 59 71.19%
Iron 12 7 71.43% 19 12 58.33%
Madison 17 11 54.55% 23 14 64.29%
Maries 8 5 60.00% 14 6 133.33%
Mississippi 12 9 33.33% 18 14 28.57%
New Madrid 17 19 -10.53% 24 29 -17.24%
Oregon 19 7 171.43% 32 10 220.00%
Pemiscot 27 29 -6.90% 47 43 9.30%
Perry 21 10 110.00% 35 15 133.33%
Phelps 44 31 41.94% 64 47 36.17%
Pulaski 38 41 -7.32% 47 52 -9.62%
Reynolds 5 9 -44.44% 8 11 -27.27%
Ripley 18 15 20.00% 29 26 11.54%
Scott 36 35 2.86% 57 46 23.91%
Shannon 17 6 183.33% 27 10 170.00%
St Francois 88 78 12.82% 129 114 13.16%
Ste Genevieve 17 18 -5.56% 26 29 -10.35%
Stoddard 31 30 3.33% 45 47 -4.26%
Texas 25 22 13.64% 35 34 2.94%
Washington 29 21 38.10% 38 35 8.57%
Wayne 10 21 -52.38% 19 29 -34.48%
* Region Total * 794 647 22.72% 1,218 955 27.54%
Southwest Barry 32 23 39.13% 45 37 21.62%
Barton 10 11 -9.09% 16 19 -15.79%
Bates 13 14 -7.14% 20 19 5.26%
Benton 19 16 18.75% 21 24 -12.50%
Camden 52 40 30.00% 70 64 9.38%
Cedar 19 14 35.71% 31 26 19.23%
Christian 67 83 -19.28% 90 118 -23.73%
Dade 6 12 -50.00% 9 21 -57.14%
Dallas 33 23 43.48% 45 39 15.39%
Douglas 13 15 -13.33% 21 17 23.53%
Greene 383 383 0.00% 543 523 3.82%
Henry 26 29 -10.35% 33 39 -15.39%
Hickory 9 10 -10.00% 11 16 -31.25%
Jasper 123 134 -8.21% 187 209 -10.53%
Laclede 40 62 -35.48% 62 108 -42.59%
Lawrence 54 41 31.71% 84 63 33.33%
Mcdonald 25 25 0.00% 41 32 28.13%
Miller 42 21 100.00% 64 27 137.04%
Moniteau 14 7 100.00% 20 8 150.00%
Morgan 17 21 -19.05% 20 33 -39.39%
Newton 52 49 6.12% 80 66 21.21%
Ozark 10 10 0.00% 14 12 16.67%
Polk 61 48 27.08% 93 67 38.81%
St Clair 9 9 0.00% 12 15 -20.00%
Stone 31 37 -16.22% 51 55 -7.27%
Taney 78 71 9.86% 108 105 2.86%
Vernon 24 26 -7.69% 32 42 -23.81%
Webster 45 47 -4.26% 69 73 -5.48%
Wright 30 29 3.45% 44 47 -6.38%
* Region Total * 1,337 1,310 2.06% 1,936 1,924 0.62%
Kansas City Jackson 684 585 16.92% 983 893 10.08%
* Region Total * 684 585 16.92% 983 893 10.08%
St. Louis St Louis City 324 273 18.68% 470 429 9.56%
St Louis County 586 507 15.58% 795 669 18.83%
* Region Total * 910 780 16.67% 1,265 1,098 15.21%
Other Area Office 1 0 0.00% 5 0 0.00%
Out Home Inv 241 196 22.96% 351 304 15.46%
Out Of State 9 2 350.00% 9 2 350.00%
* Region Total * 251 198 26.77% 365 306 19.28%
State Total 5,823 5,152 13.02% 8,371 7,585 10.36%
3Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 2.
Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During November 2015
Substan- Total
tiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per
tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Northwest Andrew 1 3 5 10 0 19 0.24 4.56
Atchison 0 0 1 3 0 4 0.00 3.38
Buchanan 7 14 85 172 1 279 0.33 13.31
Caldwell 0 2 1 1 0 4 0.00 1.66
Carroll 0 0 7 13 0 20 0.00 9.12
Cass 4 2 36 69 1 112 0.15 4.24
Chariton 0 0 3 9 0 12 0.00 6.78
Clay 10 13 81 129 2 235 0.17 4.10
Clinton 4 4 10 20 0 38 0.79 7.46
Cooper 3 0 2 3 0 8 0.75 2.01
Daviess 3 0 1 4 0 8 1.33 3.55
De Kalb 3 0 1 4 0 8 1.30 3.46
Gentry 0 1 4 3 0 8 0.00 4.84
Grundy 1 0 1 10 0 12 0.41 4.86
Harrison 3 0 1 12 0 16 1.35 7.20
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Johnson 0 4 27 53 0 84 0.00 6.98
Lafayette 4 3 13 13 0 33 0.49 4.03
Linn 5 7 5 1 0 18 1.58 5.70
Livingston 4 1 2 10 0 17 1.20 5.11
Mercer 0 0 2 6 0 8 0.00 8.31
Nodaway 1 1 5 14 0 21 0.23 4.93
Pettis 1 0 24 28 1 54 0.09 5.01
Platte 2 1 22 28 0 53 0.09 2.41
Putnam 3 1 0 3 1 8 2.59 6.90
Ray 0 2 10 6 0 18 0.00 3.07
Saline 0 5 14 19 1 39 0.00 7.23
Sullivan 0 1 3 4 0 8 0.00 4.92
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 59 65 366 647 7 1,144 0.27 5.28
Northeast Adair 14 5 21 37 1 78 2.82 15.69
Audrain 2 1 6 16 0 25 0.31 3.93
Boone 7 16 28 51 0 102 0.20 2.98
Callaway 10 5 22 49 0 86 1.00 8.60
Clark 0 3 0 5 2 10 0.00 5.82
Cole 5 10 21 54 2 92 0.28 5.13
Franklin 5 6 35 105 2 153 0.20 6.09
Gasconade 0 1 7 13 0 21 0.00 6.24
Howard 0 0 3 5 0 8 0.00 3.67
Jefferson 10 12 22 85 3 132 0.18 2.40
Knox 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00 1.94
Lewis 2 0 1 5 0 8 0.84 3.34
Lincoln 2 0 16 43 0 61 0.14 4.14
Macon 3 2 2 9 3 19 0.79 5.03
Marion 9 0 6 28 1 44 1.31 6.39
Monroe 0 0 0 6 0 6 0.00 2.91
Montgomery 0 0 4 4 0 8 0.00 2.80
Osage 2 1 7 6 0 16 0.58 4.66
Pike 1 0 3 9 1 14 0.24 3.41
Ralls 1 0 2 0 0 3 0.42 1.26
Randolph 2 1 4 19 0 26 0.34 4.42
Schuyler 0 0 0 4 0 4 0.00 3.51
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shelby 0 1 1 3 0 5 0.00 3.13
St Charles 11 2 30 96 2 141 0.12 1.52
Warren 2 6 14 62 1 85 0.25 10.46
* Region Total * 88 72 256 715 18 1,149 0.28 3.64
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Butler 8 11 23 39 4 85 0.80 8.52
Cape Girardeau 3 0 6 7 0 16 0.18 0.96
Carter 1 0 3 10 0 14 0.66 9.24
Crawford 1 0 4 3 0 8 0.17 1.33
Dent 0 5 8 9 3 25 0.00 6.85
4Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 2.
Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During November 2015
Substan- Total
tiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per
tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Southeast Dunklin 1 5 22 20 4 52 0.12 6.43
Howell 4 1 12 69 2 88 0.40 8.74
Iron 0 5 12 6 0 23 0.00 9.57
Madison 5 1 7 19 0 32 1.71 10.92
Maries 0 0 8 4 0 12 0.00 5.57
Mississippi 0 1 3 18 0 22 0.00 6.90
New Madrid 2 2 2 3 0 9 0.44 1.99
Oregon 4 0 12 7 1 24 1.65 9.89
Pemiscot 1 1 7 11 1 21 0.20 4.17
Perry 1 0 1 8 1 11 0.21 2.31
Phelps 1 8 7 20 0 36 0.10 3.68
Pulaski 5 3 11 25 1 45 0.40 3.59
Reynolds 0 0 2 3 0 5 0.00 3.26
Ripley 0 11 9 24 2 46 0.00 13.91
Scott 0 0 27 56 0 83 0.00 8.43
Shannon 0 0 6 6 0 12 0.00 6.09
St Francois 8 8 36 42 3 97 0.56 6.73
Ste Genevieve 0 1 5 5 0 11 0.00 2.61
Stoddard 1 3 7 20 0 31 0.15 4.54
Texas 11 8 10 21 0 50 1.92 8.74
Washington 2 0 8 17 0 27 0.33 4.45
Wayne 5 0 5 13 0 23 1.78 8.20
* Region Total * 64 74 263 485 22 908 0.39 5.49
Southwest Barry 2 5 11 30 0 48 0.23 5.56
Barton 2 0 9 17 1 29 0.62 9.02
Bates 0 0 2 8 0 10 0.00 2.35
Benton 0 0 3 5 0 8 0.00 2.33
Camden 1 0 27 43 0 71 0.12 8.46
Cedar 1 0 10 7 0 18 0.30 5.44
Christian 10 10 36 72 6 134 0.47 6.32
Dade 0 0 10 6 1 17 0.00 9.52
Dallas 5 9 4 25 0 43 1.20 10.31
Douglas 1 1 2 5 1 10 0.33 3.27
Greene 15 29 128 217 4 393 0.26 6.73
Henry 2 2 3 6 0 13 0.40 2.62
Hickory 3 0 6 7 1 17 1.80 10.21
Jasper 5 6 53 85 3 152 0.17 5.02
Laclede 6 6 19 32 0 63 0.67 7.07
Lawrence 3 5 20 26 1 55 0.29 5.41
Mcdonald 0 4 14 19 4 41 0.00 6.33
Miller 5 1 8 29 0 43 0.81 7.00
Moniteau 3 1 10 47 0 61 0.76 15.54
Morgan 5 6 8 24 2 45 1.10 9.93
Newton 1 4 18 47 2 72 0.07 4.88
Ozark 0 0 4 1 0 5 0.00 2.57
Polk 6 10 19 52 2 89 0.78 11.61
St Clair 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00 1.53
Stone 0 6 20 26 3 55 0.00 9.12
Taney 3 7 10 34 0 54 0.26 4.73
Vernon 0 0 13 37 1 51 0.00 9.69
Webster 6 2 16 57 5 86 0.60 8.57
Wright 2 2 6 21 2 33 0.41 6.77
* Region Total * 87 116 489 988 39 1,719 0.33 6.59
Kansas City Jackson 24 17 185 460 39 725 0.14 4.38
* Region Total * 24 17 185 460 39 725 0.14 4.38
St. Louis St Louis City 18 21 104 147 35 325 0.27 4.81
St Louis County 39 21 136 261 34 491 0.17 2.10
* Region Total * 57 42 240 408 69 816 0.19 2.70
Other Out Home Inv 10 0 331 0 24 365 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 10 0 331 0 24 365 0.00 0.00
State Total 389 386 2,130 3,703 218 6,826 0.27 4.79
5Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 3.
Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During November 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 2 18.18% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Buchanan 5 2.70% 8 4.32% 65 35.14% 106 57.30% 1 0.54% 185
Caldwell 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 33.33% 8 66.67% 0 0.00% 12
Cass 3 3.75% 1 1.25% 25 31.25% 50 62.50% 1 1.25% 80
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 7
Clay 10 5.78% 10 5.78% 53 30.64% 98 56.65% 2 1.16% 173
Clinton 2 7.41% 3 11.11% 9 33.33% 13 48.15% 0 0.00% 27
Cooper 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7
Daviess 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6
De Kalb 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6
Gentry 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Grundy 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 7
Harrison 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 8
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 4 7.02% 18 31.58% 35 61.40% 0 0.00% 57
Lafayette 4 18.18% 2 9.09% 9 40.91% 7 31.82% 0 0.00% 22
Linn 3 30.00% 2 20.00% 4 40.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10
Livingston 2 15.39% 1 7.69% 2 15.39% 8 61.54% 0 0.00% 13
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4
Nodaway 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 5 31.25% 9 56.25% 0 0.00% 16
Pettis 1 2.78% 0 0.00% 17 47.22% 17 47.22% 1 2.78% 36
Platte 2 5.00% 1 2.50% 16 40.00% 21 52.50% 0 0.00% 40
Putnam 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4
Ray 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 6 46.15% 6 46.15% 0 0.00% 13
Saline 0 0.00% 1 4.55% 10 45.46% 11 50.00% 0 0.00% 22
Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 42 5.39% 40 5.13% 261 33.46% 431 55.26% 6 0.77% 780
Northeast Adair 7 14.00% 4 8.00% 14 28.00% 25 50.00% 0 0.00% 50
Audrain 2 11.11% 1 5.56% 3 16.67% 12 66.67% 0 0.00% 18
Boone 6 8.45% 9 12.68% 22 30.99% 34 47.89% 0 0.00% 71
Callaway 8 16.67% 2 4.17% 10 20.83% 28 58.33% 0 0.00% 48
Clark 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 1 12.50% 8
Cole 4 5.80% 9 13.04% 13 18.84% 42 60.87% 1 1.45% 69
Franklin 4 4.21% 5 5.26% 23 24.21% 63 66.32% 0 0.00% 95
Gasconade 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 3 33.33% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6
Jefferson 6 6.59% 9 9.89% 14 15.39% 60 65.93% 2 2.20% 91
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lewis 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 7
Lincoln 2 4.55% 0 0.00% 12 27.27% 30 68.18% 0 0.00% 44
Macon 3 23.08% 1 7.69% 2 15.39% 6 46.15% 1 7.69% 13
Marion 4 15.39% 0 0.00% 5 19.23% 16 61.54% 1 3.85% 26
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5
Osage 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8
Pike 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 2 20.00% 7 70.00% 0 0.00% 10
Ralls 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Randolph 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 4 25.00% 10 62.50% 0 0.00% 16
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5
St Charles 8 7.02% 2 1.75% 27 23.68% 75 65.79% 2 1.75% 114
Warren 1 2.00% 3 6.00% 9 18.00% 36 72.00% 1 2.00% 50
* Region Total * 61 7.90% 50 6.48% 175 22.67% 477 61.79% 9 1.17% 772
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 5 9.26% 6 11.11% 14 25.93% 27 50.00% 2 3.70% 54
Cape Girardeau 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 3 27.27% 6 54.55% 0 0.00% 11
Carter 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6
Crawford 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6
Dent 0 0.00% 3 20.00% 4 26.67% 7 46.67% 1 6.67% 15
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated OtherFamily Assessment
6Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 3.
Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During November 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 1 3.57% 3 10.71% 10 35.71% 12 42.86% 2 7.14% 28
Howell 4 6.35% 1 1.59% 9 14.29% 47 74.60% 2 3.18% 63
Iron 0 0.00% 3 30.00% 5 50.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10
Madison 2 10.53% 1 5.26% 6 31.58% 10 52.63% 0 0.00% 19
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4
Mississippi 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 7 77.78% 0 0.00% 9
New Madrid 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6
Oregon 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 5 35.71% 6 42.86% 1 7.14% 14
Pemiscot 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 7 63.64% 1 9.09% 11
Perry 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 6
Phelps 1 4.76% 4 19.05% 4 19.05% 12 57.14% 0 0.00% 21
Pulaski 4 14.82% 2 7.41% 8 29.63% 13 48.15% 0 0.00% 27
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ripley 0 0.00% 4 14.82% 5 18.52% 16 59.26% 2 7.41% 27
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20 35.71% 36 64.29% 0 0.00% 56
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 55.56% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 9
St Francois 4 6.67% 5 8.33% 24 40.00% 26 43.33% 1 1.67% 60
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7
Stoddard 1 4.55% 3 13.64% 6 27.27% 12 54.55% 0 0.00% 22
Texas 6 20.00% 2 6.67% 7 23.33% 15 50.00% 0 0.00% 30
Washington 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 7 36.84% 11 57.90% 0 0.00% 19
Wayne 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 4 28.57% 9 64.29% 0 0.00% 14
* Region Total * 39 7.01% 40 7.19% 160 28.78% 303 54.50% 14 2.52% 556
Southwest Barry 1 3.03% 4 12.12% 8 24.24% 20 60.61% 0 0.00% 33
Barton 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 4 30.77% 7 53.85% 0 0.00% 13
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 7 87.50% 0 0.00% 8
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6
Camden 1 2.70% 0 0.00% 15 40.54% 21 56.76% 0 0.00% 37
Cedar 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 9 60.00% 5 33.33% 0 0.00% 15
Christian 7 7.53% 5 5.38% 27 29.03% 50 53.76% 4 4.30% 93
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 8
Dallas 4 14.29% 2 7.14% 3 10.71% 19 67.86% 0 0.00% 28
Douglas 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7
Greene 8 2.91% 17 6.18% 86 31.27% 161 58.55% 3 1.09% 275
Henry 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 2 20.00% 5 50.00% 0 0.00% 10
Hickory 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 2 20.00% 5 50.00% 1 10.00% 10
Jasper 5 4.90% 6 5.88% 29 28.43% 59 57.84% 3 2.94% 102
Laclede 3 7.14% 2 4.76% 14 33.33% 23 54.76% 0 0.00% 42
Lawrence 2 5.26% 2 5.26% 16 42.11% 18 47.37% 0 0.00% 38
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 4 16.00% 10 40.00% 10 40.00% 1 4.00% 25
Miller 2 6.06% 1 3.03% 8 24.24% 22 66.67% 0 0.00% 33
Moniteau 2 6.25% 1 3.13% 6 18.75% 23 71.88% 0 0.00% 32
Morgan 1 3.23% 3 9.68% 7 22.58% 19 61.29% 1 3.23% 31
Newton 1 2.04% 3 6.12% 15 30.61% 29 59.18% 1 2.04% 49
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Polk 1 1.75% 3 5.26% 15 26.32% 36 63.16% 2 3.51% 57
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Stone 0 0.00% 3 9.38% 11 34.38% 17 53.13% 1 3.13% 32
Taney 3 7.90% 5 13.16% 8 21.05% 22 57.90% 0 0.00% 38
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10 30.30% 22 66.67% 1 3.03% 33
Webster 5 9.43% 1 1.89% 12 22.64% 32 60.38% 3 5.66% 53
Wright 2 11.11% 2 11.11% 3 16.67% 9 50.00% 2 11.11% 18
* Region Total * 56 4.95% 66 5.83% 332 29.33% 655 57.86% 23 2.03% 1,132
Kansas City Jackson 22 4.22% 12 2.30% 135 25.86% 328 62.84% 25 4.79% 522
* Region Total * 22 4.22% 12 2.30% 135 25.86% 328 62.84% 25 4.79% 522
St. Louis St Louis City 16 7.14% 13 5.80% 67 29.91% 105 46.88% 23 10.27% 224
St Louis County 30 8.20% 15 4.10% 96 26.23% 204 55.74% 21 5.74% 366
* Region Total * 46 7.80% 28 4.75% 163 27.63% 309 52.37% 44 7.46% 590
Other Out Home Inv 7 2.71% 0 0.00% 232 89.92% 0 0.00% 19 7.36% 258
* Region Total * 7 2.71% 0 0.00% 232 89.92% 0 0.00% 19 7.36% 258
State Total 273 5.92% 236 5.12% 1,458 31.63% 2,503 54.30% 140 3.04% 4,610
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated Family Assessment Other
7Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 4.
Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During November 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11
Atchison 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Buchanan 160 87.91% 22 12.09% 0 0.00% 182
Caldwell 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Carroll 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12
Cass 72 94.74% 4 5.26% 0 0.00% 76
Chariton 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
Clay 160 99.38% 1 0.62% 0 0.00% 161
Clinton 23 88.46% 3 11.54% 0 0.00% 26
Cooper 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Daviess 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6
De Kalb 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Gentry 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Grundy 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Harrison 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 51 96.23% 2 3.77% 0 0.00% 53
Lafayette 20 90.91% 2 9.09% 0 0.00% 22
Linn 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Livingston 11 84.62% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 13
Mercer 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Nodaway 15 93.75% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 16
Pettis 32 91.43% 3 8.57% 0 0.00% 35
Platte 40 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 40
Putnam 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Ray 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13
Saline 20 95.24% 1 4.76% 0 0.00% 21
Sullivan 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 703 93.73% 47 6.27% 0 0.00% 750
Northeast Adair 44 89.80% 5 10.20% 0 0.00% 49
Audrain 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15
Boone 61 89.71% 7 10.29% 0 0.00% 68
Callaway 42 89.36% 5 10.64% 0 0.00% 47
Clark 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Cole 62 93.94% 4 6.06% 0 0.00% 66
Franklin 84 91.30% 8 8.70% 0 0.00% 92
Gasconade 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Howard 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Jefferson 78 89.66% 9 10.35% 0 0.00% 87
Knox 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lewis 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Lincoln 37 88.10% 5 11.91% 0 0.00% 42
Macon 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12
Marion 23 92.00% 2 8.00% 0 0.00% 25
Monroe 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Montgomery 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Osage 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Pike 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Ralls 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Randolph 15 93.75% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 16
Schuyler 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
St Charles 99 91.67% 9 8.33% 0 0.00% 108
Warren 41 91.11% 4 8.89% 0 0.00% 45
* Region Total * 673 91.32% 64 8.68% 0 0.00% 737
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 48 94.12% 3 5.88% 0 0.00% 51
Cape Girardeau 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10
Carter 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Crawford 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Dent 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact
8Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 4.
Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During November 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 26 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 26
Howell 51 92.73% 4 7.27% 0 0.00% 55
Iron 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10
Madison 18 94.74% 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 19
Maries 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Mississippi 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
New Madrid 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6
Oregon 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13
Pemiscot 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10
Perry 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Phelps 16 80.00% 4 20.00% 0 0.00% 20
Pulaski 26 96.30% 1 3.70% 0 0.00% 27
Reynolds 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ripley 22 91.67% 2 8.33% 0 0.00% 24
Scott 46 85.19% 8 14.82% 0 0.00% 54
Shannon 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
St Francois 54 94.74% 3 5.26% 0 0.00% 57
Ste Genevieve 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Stoddard 19 86.36% 3 13.64% 0 0.00% 22
Texas 29 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 29
Washington 15 83.33% 3 16.67% 0 0.00% 18
Wayne 9 64.29% 5 35.71% 0 0.00% 14
* Region Total * 481 91.45% 45 8.56% 0 0.00% 526
Southwest Barry 31 96.88% 1 3.13% 0 0.00% 32
Barton 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13
Bates 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Benton 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Camden 33 97.06% 1 2.94% 0 0.00% 34
Cedar 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15
Christian 81 92.05% 7 7.96% 0 0.00% 88
Dade 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Dallas 25 92.59% 2 7.41% 0 0.00% 27
Douglas 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
Greene 226 85.61% 38 14.39% 0 0.00% 264
Henry 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9
Hickory 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Jasper 94 94.95% 5 5.05% 0 0.00% 99
Laclede 38 92.68% 3 7.32% 0 0.00% 41
Lawrence 30 88.24% 4 11.77% 0 0.00% 34
Mcdonald 22 91.67% 2 8.33% 0 0.00% 24
Miller 30 93.75% 2 6.25% 0 0.00% 32
Moniteau 31 96.88% 1 3.13% 0 0.00% 32
Morgan 28 96.55% 1 3.45% 0 0.00% 29
Newton 44 93.62% 3 6.38% 0 0.00% 47
Ozark 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Polk 48 90.57% 5 9.43% 0 0.00% 53
St Clair 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Stone 28 93.33% 2 6.67% 0 0.00% 30
Taney 37 97.37% 1 2.63% 0 0.00% 38
Vernon 29 90.63% 3 9.38% 0 0.00% 32
Webster 44 89.80% 5 10.20% 0 0.00% 49
Wright 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16
* Region Total * 989 91.49% 92 8.51% 0 0.00% 1,081
Kansas City Jackson 443 90.41% 47 9.59% 0 0.00% 490
* Region Total * 443 90.41% 47 9.59% 0 0.00% 490
St. Louis St Louis City 159 83.68% 31 16.32% 0 0.00% 190
St Louis County 277 86.29% 44 13.71% 0 0.00% 321
* Region Total * 436 85.32% 75 14.68% 0 0.00% 511
Other Out Home Inv 258 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 258
* Region Total * 258 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 258
State Total 3,983 91.50% 370 8.50% 0 0.00% 4,353
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact
9Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During November 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 8 72.73% 3 27.27% 11
Atchison 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Buchanan 120 64.87% 65 35.14% 185
Caldwell 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Carroll 5 41.67% 7 58.33% 12
Cass 40 50.00% 40 50.00% 80
Chariton 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 7
Clay 163 94.22% 10 5.78% 173
Clinton 22 81.48% 5 18.52% 27
Cooper 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7
Daviess 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 6
De Kalb 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6
Gentry 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Grundy 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7
Harrison 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 8
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 21 36.84% 36 63.16% 57
Lafayette 14 63.64% 8 36.36% 22
Linn 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 10
Livingston 3 23.08% 10 76.92% 13
Mercer 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Nodaway 15 93.75% 1 6.25% 16
Pettis 20 55.56% 16 44.44% 36
Platte 36 90.00% 4 10.00% 40
Putnam 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Ray 1 7.69% 12 92.31% 13
Saline 20 90.91% 2 9.09% 22
Sullivan 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 545 69.87% 235 30.13% 780
Northeast Adair 30 60.00% 20 40.00% 50
Audrain 12 66.67% 6 33.33% 18
Boone 32 45.07% 39 54.93% 71
Callaway 26 54.17% 22 45.83% 48
Clark 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 8
Cole 59 85.51% 10 14.49% 69
Franklin 78 82.11% 17 17.90% 95
Gasconade 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9
Howard 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6
Jefferson 52 57.14% 39 42.86% 91
Knox 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Lewis 1 14.29% 6 85.71% 7
Lincoln 29 65.91% 15 34.09% 44
Macon 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 13
Marion 24 92.31% 2 7.69% 26
Monroe 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Montgomery 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5
Osage 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8
Pike 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 10
Ralls 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Randolph 2 12.50% 14 87.50% 16
Schuyler 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5
St Charles 78 68.42% 36 31.58% 114
Warren 20 40.00% 30 60.00% 50
* Region Total * 510 66.06% 262 33.94% 772
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 19 35.19% 35 64.82% 54
Cape Girardeau 2 18.18% 9 81.82% 11
Carter 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6
Crawford 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6
Dent 8 53.33% 7 46.67% 15
0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days
10Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During November 2015
Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 28 100.00% 0 0.00% 28
Howell 61 96.83% 2 3.18% 63
Iron 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 10
Madison 7 36.84% 12 63.16% 19
Maries 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Mississippi 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 9
New Madrid 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 6
Oregon 13 92.86% 1 7.14% 14
Pemiscot 2 18.18% 9 81.82% 11
Perry 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 6
Phelps 12 57.14% 9 42.86% 21
Pulaski 22 81.48% 5 18.52% 27
Reynolds 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Ripley 15 55.56% 12 44.44% 27
Scott 49 87.50% 7 12.50% 56
Shannon 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9
St Francois 29 48.33% 31 51.67% 60
Ste Genevieve 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 7
Stoddard 18 81.82% 4 18.18% 22
Texas 10 33.33% 20 66.67% 30
Washington 11 57.90% 8 42.11% 19
Wayne 6 42.86% 8 57.14% 14
* Region Total * 354 63.67% 202 36.33% 556
Southwest Barry 19 57.58% 14 42.42% 33
Barton 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 13
Bates 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 8
Benton 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6
Camden 30 81.08% 7 18.92% 37
Cedar 11 73.33% 4 26.67% 15
Christian 90 96.77% 3 3.23% 93
Dade 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8
Dallas 28 100.00% 0 0.00% 28
Douglas 0 0.00% 7 100.00% 7
Greene 114 41.46% 161 58.55% 275
Henry 3 30.00% 7 70.00% 10
Hickory 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 10
Jasper 94 92.16% 8 7.84% 102
Laclede 35 83.33% 7 16.67% 42
Lawrence 23 60.53% 15 39.47% 38
Mcdonald 24 96.00% 1 4.00% 25
Miller 26 78.79% 7 21.21% 33
Moniteau 26 81.25% 6 18.75% 32
Morgan 25 80.65% 6 19.36% 31
Newton 48 97.96% 1 2.04% 49
Ozark 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Polk 57 100.00% 0 0.00% 57
St Clair 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Stone 16 50.00% 16 50.00% 32
Taney 32 84.21% 6 15.79% 38
Vernon 24 72.73% 9 27.27% 33
Webster 43 81.13% 10 18.87% 53
Wright 8 44.44% 10 55.56% 18
* Region Total * 819 72.35% 313 27.65% 1,132
Kansas City Jackson 374 71.65% 148 28.35% 522
* Region Total * 374 71.65% 148 28.35% 522
St. Louis St Louis City 155 69.20% 69 30.80% 224
St Louis County 280 76.50% 86 23.50% 366
* Region Total * 435 73.73% 155 26.27% 590
Other Out Home Inv 253 98.06% 5 1.94% 258
* Region Total * 253 98.06% 5 1.94% 258
State Total 3,290 71.37% 1,320 28.63% 4,610
0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days
11Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 6.
CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During November 2015
Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N
CA/N Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Reports Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total
Northwest Andrew 12 0 3 0 0 15
Atchison 2 0 0 0 0 2
Buchanan 123 3 18 9 0 153
Caldwell 7 2 0 0 0 9
Carroll 6 0 0 0 0 6
Cass 87 3 7 5 0 102
Chariton 8 0 1 1 0 10
Clay 150 17 32 3 0 202
Clinton 15 0 0 1 0 16
Cooper 14 1 2 0 0 17
Daviess 11 0 0 3 0 14
De Kalb 3 0 2 0 0 5
Gentry 4 0 0 0 0 4
Grundy 10 1 0 2 0 13
Harrison 9 0 0 0 0 9
Holt 3 0 2 0 0 5
Johnson 40 2 8 0 0 50
Lafayette 30 2 1 0 0 33
Linn 9 3 0 1 0 13
Livingston 10 1 1 4 0 16
Mercer 1 1 0 0 0 2
Nodaway 14 1 1 1 0 17
Pettis 42 3 4 1 0 50
Platte 46 2 4 2 0 54
Putnam 4 0 0 2 0 6
Ray 22 2 0 2 0 26
Saline 27 1 6 5 0 39
Sullivan 7 0 0 1 0 8
Worth 1 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 717 45 92 43 0 897
Northeast Adair 24 0 3 3 0 30
Audrain 46 2 6 5 0 59
Boone 147 6 15 11 0 179
Callaway 52 3 3 4 0 62
Clark 5 0 0 1 0 6
Cole 67 8 6 7 0 88
Franklin 110 13 5 7 0 135
Gasconade 11 0 1 1 0 13
Howard 4 0 1 1 0 6
Jefferson 165 17 19 17 0 218
Knox 4 0 0 0 0 4
Lewis 8 1 0 1 0 10
Lincoln 77 0 13 2 0 92
Macon 16 0 0 1 0 17
Marion 38 2 0 0 0 40
Monroe 5 0 0 0 0 5
Montgomery 18 2 2 1 0 23
Osage 4 0 0 0 0 4
Pike 24 0 1 1 0 26
Ralls 9 0 2 0 0 11
Randolph 30 0 4 4 0 38
Schuyler 5 0 0 0 0 5
Scotland 3 0 0 1 0 4
Shelby 5 0 2 0 0 7
St Charles 208 1 35 16 0 260
Warren 45 1 4 1 0 51
* Region Total * 1,130 56 122 85 0 1,393
Southeast Bollinger 14 0 1 0 0 15
Butler 44 1 4 0 0 49
Cape Girardeau 75 2 9 7 0 93
Carter 9 0 0 1 0 10
Crawford 27 2 3 4 0 36
Dent 23 0 0 1 0 24
12Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 6.
CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During November 2015
Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N
CA/N Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Reports Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total
Southeast Dunklin 44 0 1 1 0 46
Howell 67 2 9 8 0 86
Iron 12 0 1 1 0 14
Madison 17 1 2 0 0 20
Maries 8 0 2 0 0 10
Mississippi 12 1 2 1 0 16
New Madrid 17 0 2 5 0 24
Oregon 19 0 0 0 0 19
Pemiscot 27 2 3 3 0 35
Perry 21 0 3 2 0 26
Phelps 44 3 7 5 0 59
Pulaski 38 3 3 0 0 44
Reynolds 5 0 0 1 0 6
Ripley 18 1 4 1 0 24
Scott 36 1 2 3 0 42
Shannon 17 0 0 0 0 17
St Francois 88 4 7 1 0 100
Ste Genevieve 17 0 1 1 0 19
Stoddard 31 0 5 5 0 41
Texas 25 1 4 3 0 33
Washington 29 0 0 3 0 32
Wayne 10 0 0 0 0 10
* Region Total * 794 24 75 57 0 950
Southwest Barry 32 2 1 4 0 39
Barton 10 0 0 4 0 14
Bates 13 1 3 1 0 18
Benton 19 3 5 0 0 27
Camden 52 3 9 4 0 68
Cedar 19 2 1 1 0 23
Christian 67 1 14 5 0 87
Dade 6 1 1 1 0 9
Dallas 33 2 3 2 0 40
Douglas 13 0 2 2 0 17
Greene 383 26 65 37 0 511
Henry 26 2 1 2 0 31
Hickory 9 0 0 1 0 10
Jasper 123 4 17 16 0 160
Laclede 40 2 4 5 0 51
Lawrence 54 1 6 6 0 67
Mcdonald 25 4 4 1 0 34
Miller 42 1 1 3 0 47
Moniteau 14 1 0 0 0 15
Morgan 17 2 5 1 0 25
Newton 52 2 2 8 0 64
Ozark 10 0 1 1 0 12
Polk 61 5 10 5 0 81
St Clair 9 0 1 1 0 11
Stone 31 6 7 3 0 47
Taney 78 5 11 8 0 102
Vernon 24 2 2 2 0 30
Webster 45 2 4 0 0 51
Wright 30 0 4 5 0 39
* Region Total * 1,337 80 184 129 0 1,730
Kansas City Jackson 684 73 96 40 0 893
* Region Total * 684 73 96 40 0 893
St. Louis St Louis City 324 37 47 25 0 433
St Louis County 586 29 81 32 0 728
* Region Total * 910 66 128 57 0 1,161
Other Out Home Inv 241 0 0 0 0 241
Out Of State 9 0 0 0 0 9
Stat Unit 0 0 0 0 71 71
Area Office 1 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 251 0 0 0 71 322
State Total 5,823 344 697 411 71 7,346
13Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500N
ov-
11
Feb
-12
May
-12
Au
g-1
2
No
v-1
2
Feb
-13
May
-13
Au
g-1
3
No
v-1
3
Feb
-14
May
-14
Au
g-1
4
No
v-1
4
Feb
-15
May
-15
Au
g-1
5
No
v-1
5
Figure 2.
Child Abuse & Neglect Reports
For 4 Years Through November 2015
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
De
c
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May Jun
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
Figure 3.
Child Abuse & Neglect Reports
From December 2013 Through November 2015
2013-2014 2014-2015
14Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 4.
Percentage Change in CA/N Reports
Made Twelve Months Apart November 2014 and November 2015
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 5.
CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During November 2015 by Conclusion
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstianted Family Assessment Other
15Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
Substantiated 6%
Unsubstantiated P S I 5%
Unsubstantiated 28% Family Assessment
58%
Other 3%
Figure 6.
CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During November 2015 by Conclusion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 7.
Time Between Report and Child Contact
For Investigations/Assessments Completed in November 2015
Within 24 Hours After 24 Hours No Contact
16Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 8.
Percentage of Investigations/Assessments
Completed Within 45 Days During November 2015
Within 45 Days More Than 45 Days
17Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 18 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures
Table 1.
• Based upon incidents and children reported during the month.
• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents during any
given month).
Table 2.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents during any
given month).
• Conclusions are as follows:
Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated
Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated
Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe
Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined
Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School
Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
• Population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census
Bureau, www.census.gov.
Table 3.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence
Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated
Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not
Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days
Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home
Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School
Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
Table 4.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include information
on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was
educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report or H- Located out of state.
Children’s Services Management Report 19 Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
• Based upon incidents concluded during the month.
Table 6.
• Based upon incidents and referrals reported during the month.
Figure 2. and Figure 3.
• Based upon incidents reported during the month.
Figure 4.
• Based upon incidents reported during the month compared to incidents reported during the same month of the previous year.
Figure 5. and Figure 6.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence
Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated
Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not
Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days
Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home
Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School
Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
• Figures do not include Out-of-Home Investigation, STAT Unit, or Out of State categories.
Figure 7.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include information
on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report or H- Located out of state.
Figure 8.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
Family-Centered Services
Table 7.
Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of November 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 5 6
Atchison 0 0 0 0 4 4
Buchanan 13 11 1 8 50 83
Caldwell 2 3 0 2 2 9
Carroll 3 1 0 0 0 4
Cass 6 19 15 1 91 132
Chariton 2 2 5 0 11 20
Clay 9 11 14 15 70 119
Clinton 6 7 0 1 14 28
Cooper 3 3 2 2 6 16
Daviess 1 3 0 0 6 10
De Kalb 1 1 0 1 11 14
Gentry 6 0 0 1 6 13
Grundy 5 4 0 3 11 23
Harrison 2 1 0 0 5 8
Holt 0 1 0 0 4 5
Johnson 0 15 11 2 38 66
Lafayette 9 7 1 1 19 37
Linn 1 7 12 2 21 43
Livingston 0 4 0 2 13 19
Mercer 1 0 0 0 2 3
Nodaway 4 0 0 1 22 27
Pettis 6 7 2 2 16 33
Platte 1 9 1 1 15 27
Putnam 3 4 3 0 1 11
Ray 3 4 0 2 3 12
Saline 3 8 1 4 16 32
Sullivan 2 0 0 2 11 15
Worth 0 0 0 0 1 1
* Region Total * 92 132 68 54 474 820
Northeast Adair 3 8 1 1 37 50
Audrain 3 11 0 2 39 55
Boone 15 20 20 5 176 236
Callaway 18 11 2 3 62 96
Clark 2 3 2 0 16 23
Cole 7 22 7 8 114 158
Franklin 28 35 0 10 116 189
Gasconade 3 3 0 0 22 28
Howard 1 3 1 0 13 18
Jefferson 63 28 13 19 329 452
Knox 1 0 1 0 5 7
Lewis 1 4 1 0 15 21
Lincoln 2 3 6 2 49 62
Macon 6 4 0 1 22 33
Marion 29 5 6 1 29 70
Monroe 2 4 1 0 7 14
Montgomery 3 3 0 2 11 19
Osage 2 2 0 0 8 12
Pike 9 5 0 1 13 28
Ralls 5 0 0 0 4 9
Randolph 8 10 1 2 81 102
Schuyler 0 1 1 0 6 8
Scotland 0 0 1 0 7 8
Shelby 1 3 0 0 8 12
St Charles 13 17 4 10 147 191
Warren 2 11 0 3 29 45
* Region Total * 227 216 68 70 1,365 1,946
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 2 11 13
Butler 7 12 1 11 58 89
Cape Girardeau 9 14 2 22 118 165
Carter 1 0 0 1 1 3
Crawford 3 10 0 3 7 23
Dent 3 9 1 2 18 33
22Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 7.
Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of November 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 2 5 3 2 38 50
Howell 6 12 0 6 53 77
Iron 0 2 0 1 9 12
Madison 3 0 0 1 16 20
Maries 1 0 1 2 13 17
Mississippi 0 2 1 6 17 26
New Madrid 1 6 1 6 59 73
Oregon 2 1 0 1 8 12
Pemiscot 1 10 0 4 44 59
Perry 0 1 0 1 16 18
Phelps 1 15 2 2 104 124
Pulaski 4 9 0 2 79 94
Reynolds 0 3 1 1 6 11
Ripley 5 6 0 4 12 27
Scott 2 4 2 6 61 75
Shannon 2 1 0 3 4 10
St Francois 17 11 3 4 51 86
Ste Genevieve 2 3 0 0 9 14
Stoddard 2 2 5 4 85 98
Texas 4 3 1 4 44 56
Washington 7 7 0 3 28 45
Wayne 3 3 0 2 18 26
* Region Total * 88 151 24 106 987 1,356
Southwest Barry 3 9 2 2 98 114
Barton 1 0 0 1 19 21
Bates 1 1 2 8 19 31
Benton 5 1 1 1 8 16
Camden 3 4 2 4 42 55
Cedar 0 2 1 2 19 24
Christian 1 17 3 4 48 73
Dade 0 2 0 1 10 13
Dallas 1 1 0 0 27 29
Douglas 1 1 0 0 9 11
Greene 6 20 2 8 378 414
Henry 0 5 3 5 43 56
Hickory 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jasper 3 45 53 25 295 421
Laclede 12 4 3 0 80 99
Lawrence 1 16 1 7 67 92
Mcdonald 0 3 3 0 46 52
Miller 0 9 0 0 51 60
Moniteau 4 6 0 1 10 21
Morgan 6 6 0 1 22 35
Newton 0 11 9 3 103 126
Ozark 1 0 0 0 9 10
Polk 1 5 3 2 51 62
St Clair 0 4 0 3 20 27
Stone 1 17 0 2 49 69
Taney 7 11 7 10 121 156
Vernon 0 1 0 4 18 23
Webster 7 4 0 0 16 27
Wright 3 10 1 1 51 66
* Region Total * 68 215 96 95 1,734 2,208
Kansas City Jackson 84 69 64 40 905 1,162
* Region Total * 84 69 64 40 905 1,162
St. Louis St Louis City 41 37 5 19 288 390
St Louis County 225 167 31 90 419 932
* Region Total * 266 204 36 109 707 1,322
State Total 825 987 356 474 6,172 8,814
23Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 8.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During November 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 5 6
Atchison 0 0 0 0 4 4
Buchanan 17 16 1 8 55 97
Caldwell 2 3 0 2 4 11
Carroll 3 1 0 0 0 4
Cass 6 21 16 1 92 136
Chariton 2 2 5 0 12 21
Clay 9 12 14 17 74 126
Clinton 6 7 0 1 14 28
Cooper 3 3 2 2 6 16
Daviess 1 4 0 0 7 12
De Kalb 1 1 0 1 11 14
Gentry 7 0 0 1 6 14
Grundy 5 4 0 3 13 25
Harrison 2 2 0 0 5 9
Holt 0 1 0 0 4 5
Johnson 0 17 12 4 40 73
Lafayette 10 8 1 1 22 42
Linn 1 7 12 2 21 43
Livingston 0 6 0 2 14 22
Mercer 1 0 0 0 3 4
Nodaway 4 0 0 1 23 28
Pettis 6 8 2 2 17 35
Platte 1 10 1 1 17 30
Putnam 3 4 3 0 1 11
Ray 3 4 0 2 3 12
Saline 3 9 1 4 19 36
Sullivan 3 0 1 2 14 20
Worth 0 0 0 0 1 1
* Region Total * 99 150 71 58 507 885
Northeast Adair 3 9 2 1 40 55
Audrain 4 12 0 2 44 62
Boone 17 25 21 5 181 249
Callaway 21 12 2 3 66 104
Clark 2 3 2 0 17 24
Cole 7 23 7 9 118 164
Franklin 29 35 0 10 119 193
Gasconade 3 3 0 1 23 30
Howard 2 3 1 0 13 19
Jefferson 67 31 13 20 342 473
Knox 1 0 1 0 5 7
Lewis 1 5 1 0 17 24
Lincoln 2 3 6 3 57 71
Macon 7 5 0 1 25 38
Marion 30 10 6 1 31 78
Monroe 2 4 1 0 10 17
Montgomery 4 3 0 2 13 22
Osage 2 2 0 0 9 13
Pike 9 6 0 1 14 30
Ralls 5 0 0 0 6 11
Randolph 9 10 1 2 81 103
Schuyler 0 1 1 0 6 8
Scotland 0 0 1 0 7 8
Shelby 1 3 0 0 11 15
St Charles 13 18 4 11 159 205
Warren 3 12 0 3 32 50
* Region Total * 244 238 70 75 1,446 2,073
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 2 11 13
Butler 8 12 1 11 66 98
Cape Girardeau 9 15 3 23 127 177
Carter 1 0 2 1 1 5
Crawford 4 13 0 3 9 29
Dent 3 9 1 2 19 34
24Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 8.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During November 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 3 5 3 2 44 57
Howell 7 12 0 6 57 82
Iron 1 7 0 1 11 20
Madison 3 0 0 1 16 20
Maries 1 0 1 2 14 18
Mississippi 0 3 1 6 18 28
New Madrid 1 7 1 6 60 75
Oregon 2 1 0 1 9 13
Pemiscot 1 10 0 4 48 63
Perry 0 1 0 1 19 21
Phelps 1 16 2 2 110 131
Pulaski 4 9 0 2 83 98
Reynolds 0 3 1 1 13 18
Ripley 6 7 0 4 13 30
Scott 2 4 2 7 69 84
Shannon 2 1 0 3 4 10
St Francois 17 11 3 4 52 87
Ste Genevieve 2 3 0 0 9 14
Stoddard 3 2 6 5 99 115
Texas 4 3 2 4 46 59
Washington 7 7 0 3 28 45
Wayne 3 4 0 2 20 29
* Region Total * 95 165 29 109 1,075 1,473
Southwest Barry 3 11 2 2 101 119
Barton 1 0 0 1 22 24
Bates 1 1 2 9 21 34
Benton 5 3 1 1 9 19
Camden 3 5 2 4 44 58
Cedar 0 2 1 2 19 24
Christian 2 19 3 5 54 83
Dade 0 2 0 1 11 14
Dallas 1 1 0 1 28 31
Douglas 1 3 0 1 12 17
Greene 7 24 2 9 402 444
Henry 0 6 3 5 49 63
Hickory 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jasper 3 46 53 26 313 441
Laclede 12 6 3 0 86 107
Lawrence 1 17 1 7 72 98
Mcdonald 1 6 3 0 55 65
Miller 0 9 0 0 55 64
Moniteau 4 6 0 1 10 21
Morgan 6 6 0 2 22 36
Newton 0 13 9 3 117 142
Ozark 1 0 0 0 10 11
Polk 1 5 3 2 52 63
St Clair 0 5 0 3 21 29
Stone 1 19 0 2 53 75
Taney 7 12 7 10 125 161
Vernon 0 2 0 4 21 27
Webster 9 5 0 0 19 33
Wright 5 10 1 1 55 72
* Region Total * 75 244 96 102 1,863 2,380
Kansas City Jackson 95 71 67 44 955 1,232
* Region Total * 95 71 67 44 955 1,232
St. Louis St Louis City 43 38 5 21 304 411
St Louis County 233 180 35 93 444 985
* Region Total * 276 218 40 114 748 1,396
State Total 884 1,086 373 502 6,594 9,439
25Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 9.
Persons in Family-Centered Services During November 2015
Child Total Persons with
Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Northwest Andrew 14 17 0 31 7
Atchison 6 6 0 12 3
Buchanan 252 216 0 468 93
Caldwell 21 27 0 48 12
Carroll 7 11 0 18 4
Cass 256 279 1 536 206
Chariton 53 50 0 103 27
Clay 323 261 0 584 171
Clinton 54 58 0 112 28
Cooper 26 38 0 64 17
Daviess 23 32 0 55 12
De Kalb 30 32 0 62 28
Gentry 23 23 0 46 19
Grundy 48 58 0 106 41
Harrison 16 25 0 41 10
Holt 9 14 0 23 13
Johnson 139 146 1 286 106
Lafayette 101 85 0 186 45
Linn 87 89 0 176 63
Livingston 44 50 0 94 28
Mercer 8 11 0 19 6
Nodaway 49 48 0 97 42
Pettis 68 78 0 146 59
Platte 64 63 0 127 32
Putnam 20 24 0 44 13
Ray 28 30 2 60 22
Saline 60 79 0 139 53
Sullivan 53 53 0 106 32
Worth 1 1 0 2 1
* Region Total * 1,883 1,904 4 3,791 1,193
Northeast Adair 108 110 0 218 70
Audrain 150 142 4 296 73
Boone 480 502 3 985 340
Callaway 233 231 1 465 159
Clark 41 46 0 87 41
Cole 359 334 0 693 200
Franklin 417 410 1 828 270
Gasconade 65 73 0 138 38
Howard 46 46 0 92 33
Jefferson 1,059 909 6 1,974 695
Knox 12 18 0 30 9
Lewis 44 53 0 97 29
Lincoln 159 176 3 338 90
Macon 63 71 0 134 49
Marion 137 171 1 309 109
Monroe 31 34 0 65 22
Montgomery 48 47 0 95 28
Osage 26 34 0 60 19
Pike 59 67 0 126 53
Ralls 16 25 0 41 10
Randolph 203 215 0 418 133
Schuyler 11 15 0 26 11
Scotland 19 16 1 36 12
Shelby 23 27 0 50 14
St Charles 444 422 0 866 274
Warren 115 118 1 234 64
* Region Total * 4,368 4,312 21 8,701 2,845
Southeast Bollinger 38 34 0 72 30
Butler 194 225 0 419 99
Cape Girardeau 340 410 0 750 229
Carter 7 7 0 14 2
Crawford 59 70 0 129 37
Dent 89 81 0 170 47
26Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 9.
Persons in Family-Centered Services During November 2015
Child Total Persons with
Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Southeast Dunklin 93 137 2 232 97
Howell 162 186 0 348 56
Iron 51 48 0 99 28
Madison 45 40 0 85 25
Maries 38 36 1 75 22
Mississippi 59 62 0 121 38
New Madrid 144 169 0 313 74
Oregon 28 37 0 65 9
Pemiscot 100 139 0 239 53
Perry 38 46 0 84 36
Phelps 250 263 3 516 150
Pulaski 206 207 2 415 129
Reynolds 31 29 0 60 13
Ripley 68 70 0 138 29
Scott 175 170 0 345 146
Shannon 25 23 1 49 5
St Francois 198 184 1 383 130
Ste Genevieve 28 30 0 58 21
Stoddard 211 243 0 454 148
Texas 128 133 3 264 76
Washington 87 90 0 177 69
Wayne 54 74 0 128 45
* Region Total * 2,946 3,243 13 6,202 1,843
Southwest Barry 229 255 0 484 182
Barton 54 42 0 96 29
Bates 68 65 0 133 35
Benton 38 43 0 81 20
Camden 119 128 0 247 78
Cedar 39 55 0 94 30
Christian 195 169 0 364 107
Dade 33 29 0 62 17
Dallas 66 73 0 139 42
Douglas 38 39 0 77 24
Greene 977 873 4 1,854 616
Henry 121 134 2 257 77
Hickory 10 15 0 25 7
Jasper 847 922 5 1,774 651
Laclede 214 255 0 469 159
Lawrence 202 225 0 427 142
Mcdonald 106 132 1 239 109
Miller 123 125 0 248 49
Moniteau 47 41 0 88 13
Morgan 76 89 0 165 32
Newton 251 291 1 543 244
Ozark 21 22 0 43 17
Polk 133 121 0 254 84
St Clair 60 58 1 119 36
Stone 142 175 0 317 112
Taney 314 328 3 645 218
Vernon 46 67 1 114 41
Webster 71 76 0 147 43
Wright 150 164 0 314 105
* Region Total * 4,790 5,011 18 9,819 3,319
Kansas City Jackson 2,352 2,642 15 5,009 2,076
* Region Total * 2,352 2,642 15 5,009 2,076
St. Louis St Louis City 764 1,089 12 1,865 676
St Louis County 1,847 2,092 18 3,957 1,113
* Region Total * 2,611 3,181 30 5,822 1,789
State Total 18,950 20,293 101 39,344 13,065
27Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 10.
Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During November 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 2 3
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 1 0 1 4 6
Caldwell 0 0 0 1 0 1
Carroll 0 1 0 0 0 1
Cass 0 2 0 0 4 6
Chariton 0 0 0 0 1 1
Clay 0 1 1 2 1 5
Clinton 1 1 0 0 3 5
Cooper 0 0 0 0 1 1
Daviess 0 0 0 0 1 1
De Kalb 1 0 0 0 0 1
Gentry 0 0 0 0 1 1
Grundy 0 0 0 0 1 1
Harrison 0 0 0 0 2 2
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 1 1 0 2 4
Lafayette 0 1 0 0 3 4
Linn 0 0 0 0 2 2
Livingston 0 1 0 0 1 2
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 4 4
Pettis 0 0 0 0 2 2
Platte 0 1 0 0 0 1
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 1 0 0 0 1
Saline 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 2 2
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 2 11 2 5 39 59
Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 4 5
Audrain 0 1 0 0 4 5
Boone 1 1 0 0 15 17
Callaway 0 0 0 0 9 9
Clark 0 1 0 0 0 1
Cole 1 2 1 1 10 15
Franklin 2 4 0 0 5 11
Gasconade 0 1 0 0 2 3
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 0 1 1 1 24 27
Knox 1 0 0 0 1 2
Lewis 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lincoln 0 1 1 0 7 9
Macon 0 1 0 0 2 3
Marion 2 0 0 0 2 4
Monroe 0 2 0 0 0 2
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 2 2
Osage 1 0 0 0 0 1
Pike 0 0 0 0 4 4
Ralls 1 0 0 0 0 1
Randolph 1 0 0 0 7 8
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 1 1
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 1 0 0 0 1
St Charles 1 3 0 0 15 19
Warren 0 1 0 0 7 8
* Region Total * 11 21 3 2 122 159
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 2 2 0 1 6 11
Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 13 13
Carter 0 0 2 1 0 3
Crawford 0 0 0 0 1 1
Dent 0 1 1 0 3 5
28Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 10.
Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During November 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 0 0 0 0 3 3
Howell 0 1 0 2 13 16
Iron 0 1 0 0 2 3
Madison 0 0 0 1 1 2
Maries 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mississippi 0 0 0 1 2 3
New Madrid 0 0 1 0 4 5
Oregon 0 0 0 0 2 2
Pemiscot 0 0 0 1 1 2
Perry 0 1 0 0 0 1
Phelps 0 0 0 0 5 5
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 5 5
Reynolds 0 1 0 0 0 1
Ripley 0 2 0 0 0 2
Scott 0 2 0 0 6 8
Shannon 0 0 0 1 0 1
St Francois 0 1 1 0 4 6
Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 0 3 4
Stoddard 0 0 1 0 16 17
Texas 0 1 0 0 2 3
Washington 0 1 0 0 1 2
Wayne 0 1 0 0 4 5
* Region Total * 2 16 6 8 98 130
Southwest Barry 0 1 0 0 8 9
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 1 0 0 2 3
Benton 0 0 0 0 1 1
Camden 0 1 0 0 3 4
Cedar 0 0 0 0 1 1
Christian 0 2 0 0 4 6
Dade 0 0 0 0 1 1
Dallas 0 0 0 0 3 3
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 0 2 0 1 33 36
Henry 0 0 0 1 2 3
Hickory 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jasper 0 3 1 2 18 24
Laclede 0 0 1 0 6 7
Lawrence 0 3 0 0 7 10
Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 2 2
Miller 0 0 0 0 5 5
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 6 6
Morgan 0 3 0 0 8 11
Newton 0 1 1 0 8 10
Ozark 0 0 0 0 1 1
Polk 0 1 0 0 5 6
St Clair 0 1 0 1 1 3
Stone 0 3 0 1 6 10
Taney 0 1 1 1 5 8
Vernon 0 0 0 1 0 1
Webster 3 0 0 0 8 11
Wright 0 0 0 0 1 1
* Region Total * 3 23 4 8 146 184
Kansas City Jackson 1 1 0 3 42 47
* Region Total * 1 1 0 3 42 47
St. Louis St Louis City 0 2 1 1 24 28
St Louis County 15 10 3 6 37 71
* Region Total * 15 12 4 7 61 99
State Total 34 84 19 33 508 678
29Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 11.
Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During November 2015
by Close Reason
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 6 42.86% 8 57.14% 14
Caldwell 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Chariton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clay 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 8
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Grundy 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Harrison 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 7
Lafayette 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Mercer 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Nodaway 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pettis 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Platte 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Sullivan 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 43 65.15% 23 34.85% 66
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 5
Audrain 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 7
Boone 8 61.54% 5 38.46% 13
Callaway 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 8
Clark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Cole 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6
Franklin 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Gasconade 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Howard 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Jefferson 12 57.14% 9 42.86% 21
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Lincoln 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 9
Macon 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5
Marion 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 8
Monroe 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Montgomery 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Osage 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Pike 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Ralls 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Randolph 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
St Charles 10 71.43% 4 28.57% 14
Warren 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5
* Region Total * 73 57.48% 54 42.52% 127
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 4 44.44% 5 55.56% 9
Cape Girardeau 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 12
Carter 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Crawford 1 14.29% 6 85.71% 7
Dent 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Goal Achieved Other
30Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 11.
Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During November 2015
by Close Reason
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed
Southeast Dunklin 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 7
Howell 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5
Iron 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 8
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Mississippi 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
New Madrid 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Oregon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pemiscot 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Perry 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Phelps 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 7
Pulaski 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Reynolds 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7
Ripley 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Scott 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 9
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 14 82.35% 3 17.65% 17
Texas 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
* Region Total * 80 67.80% 38 32.20% 118
Southwest Barry 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5
Barton 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Bates 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Benton 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Camden 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 10
Dade 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Dallas 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Douglas 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 6
Greene 19 63.33% 11 36.67% 30
Henry 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 7
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 18 90.00% 2 10.00% 20
Laclede 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8
Lawrence 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 6
Mcdonald 10 76.92% 3 23.08% 13
Miller 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Newton 10 62.50% 6 37.50% 16
Ozark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Polk 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
St Clair 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Stone 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6
Taney 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5
Vernon 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Webster 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 6
Wright 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6
* Region Total * 110 63.95% 62 36.05% 172
Kansas City Jackson 55 78.57% 15 21.43% 70
* Region Total * 55 78.57% 15 21.43% 70
St. Louis St Louis City 15 71.43% 6 28.57% 21
St Louis County 26 49.06% 27 50.94% 53
* Region Total * 41 55.41% 33 44.60% 74
State Total 402 64.12% 225 35.89% 627
Goal Achieved Other
31Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 12.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During November 2015
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Buchanan 18 34.62% 9 17.31% 7 13.46% 18 34.62% 52
Caldwell 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 5
Carroll 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3
Cass 14 11.77% 15 12.61% 13 10.92% 77 64.71% 119
Chariton 2 13.33% 1 6.67% 4 26.67% 8 53.33% 15
Clay 19 18.81% 17 16.83% 9 8.91% 56 55.45% 101
Clinton 5 31.25% 2 12.50% 1 6.25% 8 50.00% 16
Cooper 2 18.18% 2 18.18% 1 9.09% 6 54.55% 11
Daviess 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 6
De Kalb 5 35.71% 4 28.57% 2 14.29% 3 21.43% 14
Gentry 5 38.46% 5 38.46% 0 0.00% 3 23.08% 13
Grundy 6 30.00% 2 10.00% 2 10.00% 10 50.00% 20
Harrison 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 5
Holt 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 5
Johnson 7 10.45% 17 25.37% 11 16.42% 32 47.76% 67
Lafayette 3 11.11% 4 14.82% 3 11.11% 17 62.96% 27
Linn 5 13.89% 4 11.11% 8 22.22% 19 52.78% 36
Livingston 4 30.77% 4 30.77% 3 23.08% 2 15.39% 13
Mercer 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3
Nodaway 14 53.85% 5 19.23% 4 15.39% 3 11.54% 26
Pettis 7 22.58% 6 19.36% 6 19.36% 12 38.71% 31
Platte 1 5.88% 2 11.77% 5 29.41% 9 52.94% 17
Putnam 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 7
Ray 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 2 18.18% 7 63.64% 11
Saline 4 14.82% 6 22.22% 4 14.82% 13 48.15% 27
Sullivan 3 21.43% 0 0.00% 2 14.29% 9 64.29% 14
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
* Region Total * 133 19.88% 117 17.49% 90 13.45% 329 49.18% 669
Northeast Adair 10 22.73% 13 29.55% 7 15.91% 14 31.82% 44
Audrain 10 22.73% 5 11.36% 8 18.18% 21 47.73% 44
Boone 33 16.50% 34 17.00% 26 13.00% 107 53.50% 200
Callaway 23 28.05% 15 18.29% 12 14.63% 32 39.02% 82
Clark 2 9.52% 4 19.05% 3 14.29% 12 57.14% 21
Cole 29 26.36% 22 20.00% 16 14.55% 43 39.09% 110
Franklin 22 16.67% 26 19.70% 13 9.85% 71 53.79% 132
Gasconade 3 16.67% 4 22.22% 1 5.56% 10 55.56% 18
Howard 3 20.00% 3 20.00% 0 0.00% 9 60.00% 15
Jefferson 73 18.20% 77 19.20% 62 15.46% 189 47.13% 401
Knox 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5
Lewis 7 38.89% 2 11.11% 2 11.11% 7 38.89% 18
Lincoln 18 39.13% 13 28.26% 4 8.70% 11 23.91% 46
Macon 12 40.00% 9 30.00% 5 16.67% 4 13.33% 30
Marion 15 26.32% 7 12.28% 6 10.53% 29 50.88% 57
Monroe 2 13.33% 2 13.33% 1 6.67% 10 66.67% 15
Montgomery 4 30.77% 1 7.69% 4 30.77% 4 30.77% 13
Osage 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 5 71.43% 7
Pike 9 33.33% 5 18.52% 4 14.82% 9 33.33% 27
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 5 83.33% 6
Randolph 15 18.29% 19 23.17% 10 12.20% 38 46.34% 82
Schuyler 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 4 57.14% 7
Scotland 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 6
Shelby 3 37.50% 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 8
St Charles 36 23.38% 25 16.23% 22 14.29% 71 46.10% 154
Warren 8 22.86% 4 11.43% 13 37.14% 10 28.57% 35
* Region Total * 342 21.61% 296 18.70% 223 14.09% 722 45.61% 1,583
Southeast Bollinger 3 25.00% 5 41.67% 2 16.67% 2 16.67% 12
Butler 20 42.55% 7 14.89% 10 21.28% 10 21.28% 47
Cape Girardeau 30 26.79% 26 23.21% 18 16.07% 38 33.93% 112
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Crawford 5 35.71% 4 28.57% 0 0.00% 5 35.71% 14
Dent 7 30.44% 5 21.74% 2 8.70% 9 39.13% 23
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months
32Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 12.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During November 2015
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 14 30.44% 15 32.61% 5 10.87% 12 26.09% 46
Howell 9 30.00% 4 13.33% 3 10.00% 14 46.67% 30
Iron 4 26.67% 3 20.00% 2 13.33% 6 40.00% 15
Madison 5 31.25% 5 31.25% 1 6.25% 5 31.25% 16
Maries 1 7.69% 1 7.69% 4 30.77% 7 53.85% 13
Mississippi 5 26.32% 1 5.26% 6 31.58% 7 36.84% 19
New Madrid 7 21.88% 5 15.63% 3 9.38% 17 53.13% 32
Oregon 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4
Pemiscot 8 26.67% 11 36.67% 2 6.67% 9 30.00% 30
Perry 6 33.33% 3 16.67% 3 16.67% 6 33.33% 18
Phelps 21 21.88% 25 26.04% 18 18.75% 32 33.33% 96
Pulaski 13 20.00% 13 20.00% 10 15.39% 29 44.62% 65
Reynolds 3 25.00% 2 16.67% 2 16.67% 5 41.67% 12
Ripley 5 33.33% 4 26.67% 3 20.00% 3 20.00% 15
Scott 24 32.88% 21 28.77% 11 15.07% 17 23.29% 73
Shannon 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3
St Francois 16 22.22% 14 19.44% 6 8.33% 36 50.00% 72
Ste Genevieve 4 36.36% 3 27.27% 1 9.09% 3 27.27% 11
Stoddard 34 43.59% 17 21.80% 13 16.67% 14 17.95% 78
Texas 7 19.44% 5 13.89% 7 19.44% 17 47.22% 36
Washington 8 21.62% 4 10.81% 6 16.22% 19 51.35% 37
Wayne 9 45.00% 1 5.00% 2 10.00% 8 40.00% 20
* Region Total * 270 28.42% 206 21.68% 142 14.95% 332 34.95% 950
Southwest Barry 26 25.24% 23 22.33% 18 17.48% 36 34.95% 103
Barton 1 5.88% 2 11.77% 3 17.65% 11 64.71% 17
Bates 5 23.81% 4 19.05% 5 23.81% 7 33.33% 21
Benton 3 21.43% 2 14.29% 5 35.71% 4 28.57% 14
Camden 8 18.61% 6 13.95% 2 4.65% 27 62.79% 43
Cedar 4 22.22% 4 22.22% 4 22.22% 6 33.33% 18
Christian 12 19.36% 15 24.19% 16 25.81% 19 30.65% 62
Dade 2 18.18% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 7 63.64% 11
Dallas 3 15.00% 3 15.00% 4 20.00% 10 50.00% 20
Douglas 1 7.69% 3 23.08% 2 15.39% 7 53.85% 13
Greene 77 22.25% 45 13.01% 43 12.43% 181 52.31% 346
Henry 10 21.74% 7 15.22% 5 10.87% 24 52.17% 46
Hickory 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 4
Jasper 62 17.82% 61 17.53% 48 13.79% 177 50.86% 348
Laclede 10 13.33% 18 24.00% 14 18.67% 33 44.00% 75
Lawrence 17 23.29% 8 10.96% 11 15.07% 37 50.69% 73
Mcdonald 9 14.75% 11 18.03% 8 13.12% 33 54.10% 61
Miller 4 11.11% 12 33.33% 3 8.33% 17 47.22% 36
Moniteau 3 30.00% 2 20.00% 2 20.00% 3 30.00% 10
Morgan 7 43.75% 3 18.75% 4 25.00% 2 12.50% 16
Newton 28 21.88% 27 21.09% 18 14.06% 55 42.97% 128
Ozark 2 20.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 5 50.00% 10
Polk 9 16.67% 8 14.82% 8 14.82% 29 53.70% 54
St Clair 6 27.27% 5 22.73% 3 13.64% 8 36.36% 22
Stone 18 33.96% 8 15.09% 12 22.64% 15 28.30% 53
Taney 25 19.84% 23 18.25% 14 11.11% 64 50.79% 126
Vernon 5 27.78% 2 11.11% 4 22.22% 7 38.89% 18
Webster 9 40.91% 5 22.73% 0 0.00% 8 36.36% 22
Wright 6 11.11% 9 16.67% 11 20.37% 28 51.85% 54
* Region Total * 374 20.50% 320 17.54% 268 14.69% 862 47.26% 1,824
Kansas City Jackson 140 13.11% 180 16.85% 148 13.86% 600 56.18% 1,068
* Region Total * 140 13.11% 180 16.85% 148 13.86% 600 56.18% 1,068
St. Louis St Louis City 65 20.00% 53 16.31% 41 12.62% 166 51.08% 325
St Louis County 130 19.17% 101 14.90% 101 14.90% 346 51.03% 678
* Region Total * 195 19.44% 154 15.35% 142 14.16% 512 51.05% 1,003
State Total 1,454 20.49% 1,273 17.94% 1,013 14.27% 3,357 47.30% 7,097
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months
33Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 13.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During November 2015
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Atchison 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Buchanan 23 51.11% 16 35.56% 4 8.89% 2 4.44% 45
Caldwell 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Carroll 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cass 12 70.59% 3 17.65% 1 5.88% 1 5.88% 17
Chariton 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Clay 15 60.00% 9 36.00% 1 4.00% 0 0.00% 25
Clinton 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12
Cooper 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Daviess 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Grundy 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Harrison 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6
Lafayette 10 66.67% 3 20.00% 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 15
Linn 2 28.57% 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7
Livingston 5 55.56% 2 22.22% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 9
Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Nodaway 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pettis 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Platte 7 53.85% 5 38.46% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13
Putnam 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Ray 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Saline 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Sullivan 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 133 61.57% 63 29.17% 12 5.56% 8 3.70% 216
Northeast Adair 8 72.73% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Audrain 7 38.89% 8 44.44% 3 16.67% 0 0.00% 18
Boone 30 61.22% 6 12.25% 8 16.33% 5 10.20% 49
Callaway 12 54.55% 4 18.18% 6 27.27% 0 0.00% 22
Clark 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cole 29 53.70% 11 20.37% 12 22.22% 2 3.70% 54
Franklin 37 60.66% 18 29.51% 5 8.20% 1 1.64% 61
Gasconade 6 50.00% 2 16.67% 2 16.67% 2 16.67% 12
Howard 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Jefferson 33 45.83% 22 30.56% 8 11.11% 9 12.50% 72
Knox 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lewis 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Lincoln 16 64.00% 7 28.00% 0 0.00% 2 8.00% 25
Macon 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Marion 18 85.71% 3 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21
Monroe 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Montgomery 7 77.78% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 9
Osage 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Pike 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Ralls 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Randolph 18 85.71% 2 9.52% 0 0.00% 1 4.76% 21
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Shelby 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
St Charles 37 72.55% 12 23.53% 0 0.00% 2 3.92% 51
Warren 11 73.33% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 15
* Region Total * 306 62.45% 112 22.86% 45 9.18% 27 5.51% 490
Southeast Bollinger 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Butler 29 56.86% 13 25.49% 7 13.73% 2 3.92% 51
Cape Girardeau 29 44.62% 23 35.39% 9 13.85% 4 6.15% 65
Carter 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Crawford 6 40.00% 6 40.00% 1 6.67% 2 13.33% 15
Dent 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months
34Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 13.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During November 2015
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 6 54.55% 3 27.27% 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 11
Howell 24 46.15% 16 30.77% 8 15.39% 4 7.69% 52
Iron 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Madison 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Maries 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Mississippi 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
New Madrid 17 39.54% 13 30.23% 6 13.95% 7 16.28% 43
Oregon 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Pemiscot 11 33.33% 12 36.36% 3 9.09% 7 21.21% 33
Perry 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Phelps 27 77.14% 7 20.00% 1 2.86% 0 0.00% 35
Pulaski 15 45.46% 17 51.52% 1 3.03% 0 0.00% 33
Reynolds 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Ripley 9 60.00% 5 33.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15
Scott 9 81.82% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Shannon 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
St Francois 10 66.67% 1 6.67% 3 20.00% 1 6.67% 15
Ste Genevieve 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Stoddard 22 59.46% 10 27.03% 4 10.81% 1 2.70% 37
Texas 11 47.83% 10 43.48% 0 0.00% 2 8.70% 23
Washington 5 62.50% 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Wayne 6 66.67% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 9
* Region Total * 286 54.69% 156 29.83% 49 9.37% 32 6.12% 523
Southwest Barry 11 68.75% 2 12.50% 2 12.50% 1 6.25% 16
Barton 4 57.14% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 7
Bates 6 46.15% 5 38.46% 0 0.00% 2 15.39% 13
Benton 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Camden 9 60.00% 5 33.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15
Cedar 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6
Christian 17 80.95% 3 14.29% 1 4.76% 0 0.00% 21
Dade 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3
Dallas 8 72.73% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Douglas 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Greene 60 61.22% 26 26.53% 7 7.14% 5 5.10% 98
Henry 7 41.18% 6 35.29% 2 11.77% 2 11.77% 17
Hickory 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Jasper 59 63.44% 20 21.51% 10 10.75% 4 4.30% 93
Laclede 26 81.25% 5 15.63% 1 3.13% 0 0.00% 32
Lawrence 18 72.00% 3 12.00% 4 16.00% 0 0.00% 25
Mcdonald 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Miller 16 57.14% 10 35.71% 1 3.57% 1 3.57% 28
Moniteau 9 81.82% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Morgan 15 75.00% 5 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20
Newton 9 64.29% 4 28.57% 0 0.00% 1 7.14% 14
Ozark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Polk 5 55.56% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
St Clair 5 71.43% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
Stone 12 54.55% 7 31.82% 2 9.09% 1 4.55% 22
Taney 21 60.00% 12 34.29% 1 2.86% 1 2.86% 35
Vernon 3 33.33% 5 55.56% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9
Webster 9 81.82% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Wright 10 55.56% 4 22.22% 3 16.67% 1 5.56% 18
* Region Total * 349 62.77% 144 25.90% 42 7.55% 21 3.78% 556
Kansas City Jackson 96 58.54% 37 22.56% 12 7.32% 19 11.59% 164
* Region Total * 96 58.54% 37 22.56% 12 7.32% 19 11.59% 164
St. Louis St Louis City 51 59.30% 26 30.23% 3 3.49% 6 6.98% 86
St Louis County 130 42.35% 85 27.69% 39 12.70% 53 17.26% 307
* Region Total * 181 46.06% 111 28.24% 42 10.69% 59 15.01% 393
State Total 1,351 57.69% 623 26.60% 202 8.63% 166 7.09% 2,342
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months
35Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,000
10,500
11,000
11,500
Nov-1
1
Jan-1
2
Mar-
12
May-1
2
Jul-12
Sep-1
2
Nov-1
2
Jan-1
3
Mar-
13
May-1
3
Jul-13
Sep-1
3
Nov-1
3
Jan-1
4
Mar-
14
May-1
4
Jul-14
Sep-1
4
Nov-1
4
Jan-1
5
Mar-
15
May-1
5
Jul-15
Sep-1
5
Nov-1
5
Figure 9.
FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month
Over the Previous Four Years
-20.00%
-10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 10.
Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active
as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months Apart November 1, 2014 and November 1, 2015
36Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St Louis
Figure 11.
FCS Cases Opened During November 2015
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance of Evidence Preventive Services Court Ordered Other
Court Ordered 3% Preponderance of
Evidence 5%
Other 80%
Preventive Services 12%
Figure 12.
FCS Cases Opened During November 2015
by Reason for Opening
37Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 13.
FCS Cases Closed During November 2015
by Reason for Closing
Goal Achieved Other Reason
0 to 4 Months 21%
4 to 8 Months 18%
8 to 12 Months 14%
12+ Months 47%
Figure 14.
FCS Cases Active During November 2015
With Court Involvement by the Number of Months Open
38Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0 to 4 Months 58% 4 to 8 Months
26%
8 to 12 Months 9%
12+ Months 7%
Figure 15.
FCS Cases Active During November 2015
With No Court Involvement by the Number of Months Open
39Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 40 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures
Table 9.
Counts of persons are unduplicated.
Child caretakers are persons under legal age who are also parents.
Table 11.
Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;
function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist; all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced;
case goals have been achieved; services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and
family can/will access such resources;
no child under age 18 is still in the home;
Close reason of "Other" includes;
client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;
client moved-unable to locate;
client moved-other state notified; referred to other appropriate resource;
other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;
family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;
progress no longer being made;
resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Table 12.
All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Figure 11. and Figure 12.
Other includes Newborn Crisis Assessment and Family Assessment.
Children’s Services Management Report 41 Research and Data Analysis
Figure 13.
Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;
function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;
all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;
services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and
family can/will access such resources; no child under age 18 is still in the home;
Close reason of "Other" includes;
client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention; client moved-unable to locate;
client moved-other state notified;
referred to other appropriate resource; other;
family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan; family moved out of state;
family requests that the case be closed;
progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Figure 14.
All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Out-of-Home Placement
Table 14.
Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During November 2015
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.24 10.00
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Buchanan 0 1 1 1 0 3 0.14 10.00
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cass 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.08 9.00
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clay 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.03 0.00
Clinton 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.59 5.33
Cooper 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.50 6.00
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Grundy 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.41 12.00
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Johnson 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.17 11.50
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Linn 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.95 6.33
Livingston 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.60 8.00
Mercer 0 0 0 0 1 1 1.04 14.00
Nodaway 0 1 3 0 0 4 0.94 7.25
Pettis 0 0 4 2 0 6 0.56 6.33
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Putnam 0 2 0 0 0 2 1.72 5.50
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Saline 0 1 2 0 0 3 0.56 0.67
Sullivan 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.62 1.00
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 13 17 3 5 38 0.18 6.61
Northeast Adair 0 0 3 1 0 4 0.80 7.75
Audrain 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.63 7.00
Boone 0 0 5 0 0 5 0.15 5.00
Callaway 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.30 2.67
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cole 0 1 3 0 1 5 0.28 1.60
Franklin 0 6 2 0 0 8 0.32 4.88
Gasconade 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.59 1.50
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jefferson 0 7 15 0 1 23 0.42 8.39
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lewis 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.84 14.00
Lincoln 0 8 3 0 2 13 0.88 6.23
Macon 0 2 4 1 0 7 1.85 6.43
Marion 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.15 8.00
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Montgomery 0 0 4 0 0 4 1.40 9.00
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pike 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.97 10.00
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Schuyler 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.88 16.00
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Charles 0 3 18 0 0 21 0.23 7.05
Warren 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.12 3.00
* Region Total * 0 27 74 3 4 108 0.34 6.85
Southeast Bollinger 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.34 0.00
Butler 0 1 2 0 0 3 0.30 7.67
Cape Girardeau 0 0 15 0 0 15 0.90 5.60
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
44Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 14.
Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During November 2015
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dent 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.82 6.00
Dunklin 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.25 11.50
Howell 0 3 1 1 0 5 0.50 6.00
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Madison 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.34 1.00
Maries 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.93 9.50
Mississippi 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.94 7.00
New Madrid 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.22 5.00
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pemiscot 0 1 5 0 0 6 1.19 9.67
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Phelps 0 3 3 0 0 6 0.61 7.83
Pulaski 0 3 1 1 0 5 0.40 7.00
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ripley 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.30 0.00
Scott 0 5 6 0 0 11 1.12 6.73
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Francois 0 3 5 0 0 8 0.56 3.38
Ste Genevieve 0 4 0 0 0 4 0.95 9.25
Stoddard 0 5 0 2 0 7 1.02 7.71
Texas 0 3 2 0 0 5 0.87 3.60
Washington 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.16 5.00
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 36 50 4 0 90 0.54 6.43
Southwest Barry 0 1 2 0 0 3 0.35 4.00
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Bates 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.47 1.00
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cedar 0 0 4 0 0 4 1.21 7.75
Christian 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.09 12.50
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dallas 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.48 13.00
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Greene 0 7 3 2 0 12 0.21 6.67
Henry 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.20 14.00
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jasper 0 3 7 3 2 15 0.50 7.27
Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lawrence 0 3 4 1 0 8 0.79 6.75
Mcdonald 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.62 8.75
Miller 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.16 9.00
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Newton 0 5 6 0 0 11 0.75 9.00
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Polk 0 1 2 2 0 5 0.65 8.80
St Clair 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.51 16.00
Stone 0 9 2 2 1 14 2.32 8.43
Taney 0 2 3 1 2 8 0.70 6.50
Vernon 0 1 0 3 0 4 0.76 15.25
Webster 0 3 0 1 0 4 0.40 7.50
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 40 40 16 5 101 0.39 8.09
Kansas City Jackson 0 5 22 16 1 44 0.27 6.05
* Region Total * 0 5 22 16 1 44 0.27 6.05
St. Louis St Louis City 0 3 7 1 0 11 0.16 5.82
St Louis County 0 21 15 4 3 43 0.18 5.91
* Region Total * 0 24 22 5 3 54 0.18 5.89
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
State Total 0 145 225 47 18 435 0.31 6.83
45Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 15.
Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During November 2015
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Buchanan 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.05 4.00
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cass 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.04 9.00
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Johnson 0 1 0 3 0 4 0.33 13.75
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Nodaway 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.23 11.00
Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 2 2 3 0 7 0.03 11.29
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Boone 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.03 18.00
Callaway 0 4 1 0 0 5 0.50 7.20
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Franklin 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.08 13.50
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jefferson 0 0 2 0 1 3 0.05 11.00
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lincoln 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.20 11.33
Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Marion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pike 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.49 15.00
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Charles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 8 5 1 2 16 0.05 11.13
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cape Girardeau 0 0 5 0 0 5 0.30 8.00
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
46Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 15.
Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During November 2015
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category
Group Home/ Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Phelps 0 1 0 1 0 2 0.20 15.00
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Stoddard 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.44 10.33
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 3 6 1 0 10 0.06 10.10
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Benton 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.29 8.00
Camden 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.12 16.00
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Christian 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.05 13.00
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Greene 0 4 1 0 0 5 0.09 7.20
Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jasper 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.03 1.00
Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lawrence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mcdonald 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.31 11.00
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Newton 0 3 1 0 0 4 0.27 4.25
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Polk 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.39 9.33
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Stone 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.33 11.50
Taney 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.09 12.00
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 10 9 1 1 21 0.08 8.38
Kansas City Jackson 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.01 8.00
* Region Total * 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.01 8.00
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.03 13.50
St Louis County 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.01 12.00
* Region Total * 0 2 2 1 0 5 0.02 12.60
State Total 0 26 25 7 3 61 0.04 10.05
47Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 16.
Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
From November 2013 Through October 2015
Total
Month/Year Entries Reentries (Re)Entries
Nov-2013 471 79 550
Dec-2013 397 69 466
Jan-2014 475 76 551
Feb-2014 438 77 515
Mar-2014 461 100 561
Apr-2014 680 96 776
May-2014 475 109 584
Jun-2014 524 84 608
Jul-2014 521 100 621
Aug-2014 554 100 654
Sep-2014 597 83 680
Oct-2014 577 104 681
Nov-2014 410 82 492
Dec-2014 463 73 536
Jan-2015 506 84 590
Feb-2015 437 90 527
Mar-2015 481 96 577
Apr-2015 545 80 625
May-2015 478 92 570
Jun-2015 486 85 571
Jul-2015 459 92 551
Aug-2015 566 91 657
Sep-2015 537 86 623
Oct-2015 598 71 669
Total 12,136 2,099 14,235
48Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 17.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During November 2015
by Length of Stay and Region
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Northwest 25 41.67% 24 40.00% 11 18.33% 60 18.38 7.83
Northeast 42 41.18% 24 23.53% 36 35.29% 102 21.50 9.26
Southeast 27 32.14% 33 39.29% 24 28.57% 84 20.00 8.74
Southwest 40 29.20% 49 35.77% 48 35.04% 137 23.75 10.01
Kansas City 12 20.00% 14 23.33% 34 56.67% 60 25.22 8.88
St. Louis 7 22.58% 10 32.26% 14 45.16% 31 40.35 10.68
State Total 153 32.28% 154 32.49% 167 35.23% 474 23.19 9.25
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
49Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 18.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Northwest Andrew 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2 44.50 15.00
Atchison 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7 24.71 5.00
Buchanan 40 54.05% 18 24.32% 16 21.62% 74 15.45 7.82
Caldwell 3 18.75% 5 31.25% 8 50.00% 16 23.81 7.94
Carroll 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 6 12.83 2.50
Cass 61 28.37% 67 31.16% 87 40.47% 215 24.32 10.31
Chariton 19 61.29% 2 6.45% 10 32.26% 31 17.00 8.71
Clay 64 36.16% 58 32.77% 55 31.07% 177 20.73 7.49
Clinton 23 41.07% 18 32.14% 15 26.79% 56 22.59 9.21
Cooper 5 26.32% 8 42.11% 6 31.58% 19 19.63 11.00
Daviess 6 25.00% 10 41.67% 8 33.33% 24 26.63 8.79
De Kalb 13 38.24% 14 41.18% 7 20.59% 34 16.47 7.29
Gentry 14 70.00% 4 20.00% 2 10.00% 20 16.25 6.10
Grundy 23 44.23% 16 30.77% 13 25.00% 52 17.40 7.77
Harrison 9 40.91% 5 22.73% 8 36.36% 22 23.45 10.32
Holt 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8 8.00 12.00
Johnson 47 51.65% 24 26.37% 20 21.98% 91 20.66 10.20
Lafayette 11 22.92% 25 52.08% 12 25.00% 48 21.67 7.77
Linn 26 45.61% 17 29.83% 14 24.56% 57 16.58 9.42
Livingston 25 45.46% 22 40.00% 8 14.55% 55 19.75 8.73
Mercer 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 4.75 9.00
Nodaway 27 58.70% 6 13.04% 13 28.26% 46 19.98 7.70
Pettis 30 41.67% 29 40.28% 13 18.06% 72 20.31 9.38
Platte 14 41.18% 10 29.41% 10 29.41% 34 24.53 9.97
Putnam 10 40.00% 5 20.00% 10 40.00% 25 20.80 9.08
Ray 7 36.84% 4 21.05% 8 42.11% 19 20.74 7.00
Saline 20 46.51% 11 25.58% 12 27.91% 43 15.33 7.26
Sullivan 5 26.32% 6 31.58% 8 42.11% 19 22.37 7.21
Worth 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 19.00 1.00
* Region Total * 515 40.33% 394 30.85% 368 28.82% 1,277 20.47 8.74
Northeast Adair 50 64.10% 12 15.39% 16 20.51% 78 13.54 8.42
Audrain 42 48.84% 20 23.26% 24 27.91% 86 22.23 9.44
Boone 155 47.99% 77 23.84% 91 28.17% 323 20.93 9.67
Callaway 64 48.49% 36 27.27% 32 24.24% 132 18.64 7.66
Clark 13 26.00% 19 38.00% 18 36.00% 50 22.18 10.36
Cole 91 50.56% 50 27.78% 39 21.67% 180 20.73 7.79
Franklin 117 38.49% 69 22.70% 118 38.82% 304 22.36 8.66
Gasconade 21 56.76% 4 10.81% 12 32.43% 37 17.30 7.46
Howard 12 48.00% 1 4.00% 12 48.00% 25 20.60 7.60
Jefferson 284 45.37% 214 34.19% 128 20.45% 626 16.81 8.13
Knox 6 60.00% 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 10 14.80 8.10
Lewis 14 46.67% 9 30.00% 7 23.33% 30 21.10 13.93
Lincoln 37 52.86% 11 15.71% 22 31.43% 70 20.14 7.54
Macon 42 72.41% 5 8.62% 11 18.97% 58 11.64 8.26
Marion 58 44.28% 29 22.14% 44 33.59% 131 19.26 9.60
Monroe 7 31.82% 10 45.46% 5 22.73% 22 17.68 5.86
Montgomery 16 44.44% 9 25.00% 11 30.56% 36 25.58 9.78
Osage 3 21.43% 9 64.29% 2 14.29% 14 13.57 7.79
Pike 29 53.70% 13 24.07% 12 22.22% 54 15.65 8.06
Ralls 2 11.11% 6 33.33% 10 55.56% 18 35.33 11.06
Randolph 46 40.35% 49 42.98% 19 16.67% 114 18.07 10.25
Schuyler 3 27.27% 4 36.36% 4 36.36% 11 17.73 12.36
Scotland 6 66.67% 1 11.11% 2 22.22% 9 23.67 9.44
Shelby 13 76.47% 4 23.53% 0 0.00% 17 8.76 11.35
St Charles 124 41.75% 88 29.63% 85 28.62% 297 21.08 8.99
Warren 26 49.06% 17 32.08% 10 18.87% 53 19.57 8.66
* Region Total * 1,281 46.00% 769 27.61% 735 26.39% 2,785 19.31 8.76
Southeast Bollinger 29 70.73% 7 17.07% 5 12.20% 41 13.22 7.71
Butler 68 30.49% 99 44.40% 56 25.11% 223 18.90 8.40
Cape Girardeau 158 59.62% 75 28.30% 32 12.08% 265 13.58 7.50
Carter 2 25.00% 2 25.00% 4 50.00% 8 33.75 12.38
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
50Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 18.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Southeast Crawford 23 34.85% 30 45.46% 13 19.70% 66 17.18 9.14
Dent 23 44.23% 20 38.46% 9 17.31% 52 21.46 8.87
Dunklin 63 52.50% 45 37.50% 12 10.00% 120 15.08 8.24
Howell 29 42.03% 27 39.13% 13 18.84% 69 20.07 9.68
Iron 11 40.74% 11 40.74% 5 18.52% 27 15.44 9.96
Madison 14 31.11% 14 31.11% 17 37.78% 45 23.11 6.87
Maries 8 36.36% 8 36.36% 6 27.27% 22 20.95 8.86
Mississippi 27 62.79% 12 27.91% 4 9.30% 43 11.26 7.42
New Madrid 32 45.71% 15 21.43% 23 32.86% 70 18.40 7.83
Oregon 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 8 49.00 9.50
Pemiscot 39 42.39% 20 21.74% 33 35.87% 92 20.43 7.78
Perry 22 57.90% 11 28.95% 5 13.16% 38 13.58 8.11
Phelps 69 41.07% 61 36.31% 38 22.62% 168 16.64 8.35
Pulaski 55 44.36% 47 37.90% 22 17.74% 124 17.21 7.18
Reynolds 8 34.78% 11 47.83% 4 17.39% 23 22.39 9.26
Ripley 20 37.74% 16 30.19% 17 32.08% 53 25.53 9.30
Scott 100 75.19% 24 18.05% 9 6.77% 133 9.92 6.93
Shannon 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 5 53.40 11.00
St Francois 58 31.87% 58 31.87% 66 36.26% 182 24.48 8.73
Ste Genevieve 9 45.00% 7 35.00% 4 20.00% 20 15.00 9.75
Stoddard 86 64.66% 30 22.56% 17 12.78% 133 12.62 8.60
Texas 41 46.07% 28 31.46% 20 22.47% 89 15.61 7.30
Washington 44 39.64% 33 29.73% 34 30.63% 111 21.63 7.50
Wayne 20 37.04% 11 20.37% 23 42.59% 54 23.91 8.78
* Region Total * 1,063 46.54% 722 31.61% 499 21.85% 2,284 17.71 8.14
Southwest Barry 93 49.73% 59 31.55% 35 18.72% 187 16.70 8.14
Barton 7 30.44% 9 39.13% 7 30.44% 23 20.57 9.57
Bates 18 58.07% 7 22.58% 6 19.36% 31 15.39 7.23
Benton 8 34.78% 9 39.13% 6 26.09% 23 17.83 13.65
Camden 22 26.51% 29 34.94% 32 38.55% 83 22.49 8.49
Cedar 25 86.21% 3 10.35% 1 3.45% 29 6.93 8.97
Christian 54 40.91% 54 40.91% 24 18.18% 132 19.24 8.81
Dade 7 46.67% 8 53.33% 0 0.00% 15 11.00 8.87
Dallas 15 33.33% 18 40.00% 12 26.67% 45 23.09 9.13
Douglas 10 34.48% 15 51.72% 4 13.79% 29 17.10 10.59
Greene 255 32.32% 259 32.83% 275 34.85% 789 24.00 8.40
Henry 29 34.12% 20 23.53% 36 42.35% 85 27.25 10.42
Hickory 4 50.00% 1 12.50% 3 37.50% 8 26.75 10.38
Jasper 243 42.26% 177 30.78% 155 26.96% 575 19.05 8.98
Laclede 74 50.00% 29 19.60% 45 30.41% 148 19.29 8.45
Lawrence 72 39.34% 67 36.61% 44 24.04% 183 19.79 10.07
Mcdonald 46 44.23% 39 37.50% 19 18.27% 104 18.54 11.13
Miller 16 33.33% 10 20.83% 22 45.83% 48 27.21 9.40
Moniteau 7 53.85% 3 23.08% 3 23.08% 13 17.46 9.31
Morgan 19 55.88% 10 29.41% 5 14.71% 34 16.18 9.79
Newton 102 49.76% 73 35.61% 30 14.63% 205 15.40 8.46
Ozark 10 34.48% 7 24.14% 12 41.38% 29 20.76 6.76
Polk 39 45.35% 25 29.07% 22 25.58% 86 17.86 8.55
St Clair 17 44.74% 16 42.11% 5 13.16% 38 13.74 11.08
Stone 56 56.57% 17 17.17% 26 26.26% 99 16.41 9.27
Taney 108 42.52% 54 21.26% 92 36.22% 254 22.58 8.15
Vernon 22 47.83% 10 21.74% 14 30.44% 46 23.37 8.35
Webster 21 46.67% 12 26.67% 12 26.67% 45 20.38 9.22
Wright 48 41.74% 44 38.26% 23 20.00% 115 17.37 9.08
* Region Total * 1,447 41.33% 1,084 30.96% 970 27.71% 3,501 20.24 8.88
Kansas City Jackson 633 35.56% 520 29.21% 627 35.23% 1,780 22.63 8.66
* Region Total * 633 35.56% 520 29.21% 627 35.23% 1,780 22.63 8.66
St. Louis St Louis City 234 35.14% 161 24.17% 271 40.69% 666 31.42 9.26
St Louis County 404 43.12% 274 29.24% 259 27.64% 937 21.49 8.14
* Region Total * 638 39.80% 435 27.14% 530 33.06% 1,603 26 8.61
Other Icama 6 54.55% 0 0.00% 5 45.46% 11 14.64 9.00
* Region Total * 6 54.55% 0 0.00% 5 45.46% 11 14.64 9.00
State Total 5,583 42.16% 3,924 29.64% 3,734 28.20% 13,241 20.60 8.65
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
51Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 19.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Category
Group Home/ Children
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.48 15.00
Atchison 0 3 4 0 0 7 5.92 5.00
Buchanan 0 33 31 8 2 74 3.53 7.82
Caldwell 0 7 9 0 0 16 6.66 7.94
Carroll 0 2 4 0 0 6 2.74 2.50
Cass 1 54 99 51 10 215 8.15 10.31
Chariton 0 17 6 6 2 31 17.52 8.71
Clay 0 81 67 19 10 177 3.09 7.49
Clinton 0 30 19 7 0 56 10.99 9.21
Cooper 0 4 3 10 2 19 4.78 11.00
Daviess 0 8 12 1 3 24 10.66 8.79
De Kalb 0 21 8 4 1 34 14.72 7.29
Gentry 0 3 16 0 1 20 12.09 6.10
Grundy 0 24 23 4 1 52 21.08 7.77
Harrison 0 7 12 1 2 22 9.91 10.32
Holt 0 2 4 2 0 8 8.24 12.00
Johnson 0 29 34 19 9 91 7.56 10.20
Lafayette 0 12 28 8 0 48 5.86 7.77
Linn 0 21 29 5 2 57 18.06 9.42
Livingston 0 14 31 7 3 55 16.52 8.73
Mercer 0 2 0 1 1 4 4.15 9.00
Nodaway 0 8 34 1 3 46 10.79 7.70
Pettis 0 32 22 13 5 72 6.68 9.38
Platte 0 20 7 4 3 34 1.55 9.97
Putnam 0 13 9 1 2 25 21.55 9.08
Ray 0 13 4 1 1 19 3.24 7.00
Saline 0 10 27 6 0 43 7.97 7.26
Sullivan 0 10 6 2 1 19 11.69 7.21
Worth 0 0 1 0 0 1 2.25 1.00
* Region Total * 1 481 549 181 65 1,277 5.90 8.74
Northeast Adair 0 23 41 8 6 78 15.69 8.42
Audrain 2 20 46 12 6 86 13.50 9.44
Boone 0 79 153 70 21 323 9.43 9.67
Callaway 0 33 63 33 3 132 13.20 7.66
Clark 0 17 26 5 2 50 29.12 10.36
Cole 0 69 77 18 16 180 10.04 7.79
Franklin 0 128 130 10 36 304 12.11 8.66
Gasconade 0 19 13 3 2 37 11.00 7.46
Howard 0 8 13 4 0 25 11.48 7.60
Jefferson 5 180 380 35 26 626 11.38 8.13
Knox 0 0 9 0 1 10 9.69 8.10
Lewis 0 11 8 7 4 30 12.53 13.93
Lincoln 0 41 17 7 5 70 4.75 7.54
Macon 0 17 32 5 4 58 15.35 8.26
Marion 0 63 47 17 4 131 19.02 9.60
Monroe 0 7 14 1 0 22 10.67 5.86
Montgomery 0 5 21 2 8 36 12.62 9.78
Osage 0 3 11 0 0 14 4.08 7.79
Pike 0 25 27 1 1 54 13.15 8.06
Ralls 0 14 2 2 0 18 7.57 11.06
Randolph 0 44 49 17 4 114 19.39 10.25
Schuyler 0 3 4 3 1 11 9.65 12.36
Scotland 0 2 3 3 1 9 6.61 9.44
Shelby 0 1 13 3 0 17 10.65 11.35
St Charles 3 122 135 21 16 297 3.20 8.99
Warren 0 12 30 5 6 53 6.52 8.66
* Region Total * 10 946 1,364 292 173 2,785 8.83 8.76
Southeast Bollinger 0 7 29 3 2 41 14.06 7.71
Butler 0 67 115 30 11 223 22.36 8.40
Cape Girardeau 0 85 151 20 9 265 15.96 7.50
Carter 0 2 4 0 2 8 5.28 12.38
52Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis Unit
Table 19.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Category
Group Home/ Children
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 20 26 16 4 66 11.00 9.14
Dent 0 16 17 16 3 52 14.24 8.87
Dunklin 0 29 66 17 8 120 14.84 8.24
Howell 0 30 23 12 4 69 6.86 9.68
Iron 0 1 16 9 1 27 11.24 9.96
Madison 1 14 24 5 1 45 15.35 6.87
Maries 0 6 14 2 0 22 10.21 8.86
Mississippi 0 12 29 2 0 43 13.49 7.42
New Madrid 2 17 46 5 0 70 15.51 7.83
Oregon 0 3 2 0 3 8 3.30 9.50
Pemiscot 0 28 48 12 4 92 18.28 7.78
Perry 1 17 12 7 1 38 7.98 8.11
Phelps 0 43 93 29 3 168 17.16 8.35
Pulaski 0 43 57 19 5 124 9.89 7.18
Reynolds 0 3 14 6 0 23 15.01 9.26
Ripley 0 8 29 10 6 53 16.03 9.30
Scott 1 29 96 3 4 133 13.50 6.93
Shannon 0 2 0 3 0 5 2.54 11.00
St Francois 5 78 56 32 11 182 12.63 8.73
Ste Genevieve 0 12 1 5 2 20 4.74 9.75
Stoddard 0 40 53 37 3 133 19.47 8.60
Texas 0 25 53 7 4 89 15.56 7.30
Washington 0 52 44 15 0 111 18.31 7.50
Wayne 0 19 23 11 1 54 19.24 8.78
* Region Total * 10 708 1,141 333 92 2,284 13.82 8.14
Southwest Barry 0 60 82 36 9 187 21.64 8.14
Barton 0 10 7 5 1 23 7.16 9.57
Bates 0 8 19 1 3 31 7.29 7.23
Benton 0 9 4 10 0 23 6.69 13.65
Camden 0 41 29 6 7 83 9.89 8.49
Cedar 0 7 16 4 2 29 8.77 8.97
Christian 0 54 55 10 13 132 6.23 8.81
Dade 0 6 6 3 0 15 8.40 8.87
Dallas 0 20 15 6 4 45 10.79 9.13
Douglas 0 9 9 8 3 29 9.47 10.59
Greene 12 339 260 124 54 789 13.52 8.40
Henry 0 39 25 12 9 85 17.15 10.42
Hickory 0 3 3 0 2 8 4.80 10.38
Jasper 6 204 261 74 30 575 18.99 8.98
Laclede 0 52 74 18 4 148 16.62 8.45
Lawrence 1 43 86 43 10 183 17.99 10.07
Mcdonald 0 26 60 13 5 104 16.06 11.13
Miller 0 18 18 9 3 48 7.81 9.40
Moniteau 0 3 6 3 1 13 3.31 9.31
Morgan 0 15 12 3 4 34 7.50 9.79
Newton 0 84 85 29 7 205 13.89 8.46
Ozark 0 11 17 1 0 29 14.88 6.76
Polk 0 32 34 14 6 86 11.22 8.55
St Clair 0 9 23 5 1 38 19.39 11.08
Stone 0 47 26 17 9 99 16.41 9.27
Taney 0 122 84 33 15 254 22.23 8.15
Vernon 0 24 14 7 1 46 8.74 8.35
Webster 0 21 16 6 2 45 4.48 9.22
Wright 0 39 56 17 3 115 23.60 9.08
* Region Total * 19 1,355 1,402 517 208 3,501 13.42 8.88
Kansas City Jackson 14 647 736 234 149 1,780 10.75 8.66
* Region Total * 14 647 736 234 149 1,780 10.75 8.66
St. Louis St Louis City 2 273 251 84 56 666 9.86 9.26
St Louis County 10 358 404 102 63 937 4.00 8.14
* Region Total * 12 631 655 186 119 1,603 5.31 8.61
Other Icama 1 3 4 3 0 11 0.00 9.00
* Region Total * 1 3 4 3 0 11 0.00 9.00
State Total 67 4,771 5,851 1,746 806 13,241 9.29 8.65
53Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis Unit
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 2
Chariton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0
Clinton 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1
Harrison 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Pettis 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Platte 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 1 0 0 42 6 0 0 0 5
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0
Audrain 0 0 0 4 1 0 2 0 0
Boone 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0
Callaway 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0
Clark 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
Franklin 0 0 0 6 10 2 0 0 0
Gasconade 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 1 3 1 16 0 2 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 3 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 4 3 1 83 13 9 2 0 0
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
54Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Madison 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perry 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scott 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 2 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 7 1 0 7 4 4 2 0 11
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3
Cedar 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 0 0 5 4 1 0 0 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 9 0 3 30 1 0 0 0 0
Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 2 1 0 33 4 0 3 0 0
Laclede 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Lawrence 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Mcdonald 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3
Newton 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Taney 0 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 0
Vernon 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 12 1 3 104 14 1 3 0 6
Kansas City Jackson 11 0 3 97 6 4 0 1 3
* Region Total * 11 0 3 97 6 4 0 1 3
St. Louis St Louis City 1 1 0 35 4 1 0 0 0
St Louis County 1 3 3 41 0 0 3 0 0
* Region Total * 2 4 3 76 4 1 3 0 0
Other Icama 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 37 9 11 409 47 19 10 1 25
55Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 4 2 2 21 0 0 2
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Cass 0 3 0 1 36 1 0 0
Chariton 0 1 0 0 15 0 0 0
Clay 0 5 0 2 67 0 0 0
Clinton 0 1 0 0 27 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Daviess 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 3 2 15 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 1 3 17 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Johnson 0 1 0 1 25 1 0 0
Lafayette 0 2 0 0 9 0 0 0
Linn 0 1 3 2 12 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 3 0 0 4 2 0 3
Pettis 0 3 0 0 28 0 0 0
Platte 0 1 0 0 18 2 0 0
Putnam 0 4 2 0 6 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 30 14 15 375 8 0 5
Northeast Adair 0 4 1 0 16 1 0 0
Audrain 0 3 0 0 13 1 0 0
Boone 0 6 1 2 63 6 0 0
Callaway 0 3 1 2 22 0 0 0
Clark 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 0
Cole 0 4 0 3 60 2 0 0
Franklin 0 3 8 3 108 6 0 1
Gasconade 0 0 0 1 17 1 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Jefferson 0 24 2 5 133 7 0 1
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 8 2 0 0
Lincoln 0 1 3 2 34 1 0 0
Macon 0 1 0 0 16 2 0 0
Marion 0 2 1 3 53 1 0 1
Monroe 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Pike 0 2 3 0 20 0 0 0
Ralls 0 3 0 0 11 0 0 0
Randolph 0 2 0 1 35 1 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
St Charles 0 12 1 1 88 2 0 0
Warren 0 0 1 0 11 3 0 0
* Region Total * 0 71 22 27 743 38 0 3
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0
Butler 0 1 0 2 62 0 0 1
Cape Girardeau 0 1 4 9 59 0 0 0
Carter 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
56Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB
Southeast Crawford 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 0
Dent 0 0 2 0 14 1 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0
Howell 0 0 0 3 27 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Madison 0 1 1 1 11 0 0 0
Maries 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 1 0 1 14 0 0 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 1 0 1 26 2 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 0
Phelps 0 0 0 3 40 0 0 0
Pulaski 0 3 1 2 37 1 0 2
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1
Ripley 0 1 0 1 6 1 0 0
Scott 0 0 0 1 28 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
St Francois 0 0 14 2 62 3 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 4 0 8 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 2 2 36 1 0 0
Texas 0 1 0 1 23 0 0 0
Washington 0 0 3 2 45 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 3 15 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 12 31 36 611 10 0 4
Southwest Barry 0 2 3 2 52 1 0 0
Barton 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0
Benton 0 1 0 1 7 0 0 0
Camden 0 1 0 2 32 1 0 0
Cedar 0 1 0 0 6 1 0 0
Christian 0 1 1 5 42 2 0 1
Dade 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0
Dallas 0 1 0 0 18 1 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0
Greene 0 23 0 16 270 16 0 1
Henry 0 5 3 0 31 2 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0
Jasper 0 12 0 5 154 2 0 0
Laclede 0 1 0 1 48 1 0 0
Lawrence 0 1 0 1 38 1 0 0
Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 22 1 0 0
Miller 0 0 0 2 13 1 0 0
Moniteau 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 9 2 0 0
Newton 0 6 0 2 74 3 0 0
Ozark 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 0 1 31 2 0 0
St Clair 0 0 1 0 8 1 0 0
Stone 0 1 8 3 32 0 0 0
Taney 0 12 0 8 93 2 0 0
Vernon 0 0 0 1 22 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 0 3 17 1 0 0
Wright 0 2 0 6 31 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 71 18 64 1,092 43 0 2
Kansas City Jackson 0 76 25 30 415 35 0 3
* Region Total * 0 76 25 30 415 35 0 3
St. Louis St Louis City 0 44 15 11 168 8 0 1
St Louis County 0 34 26 22 235 15 0 0
* Region Total * 0 78 41 33 403 23 0 1
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
State Total 0 338 151 205 3,642 157 0 18
57Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
KHM KHO KHU LGS MMD MMH RFA RFP RF2
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 4 1 0 0 1 7 0 0
Caldwell 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 11 8 0 1 6 35 0 0
Chariton 0 2 3 0 0 2 4 0 0
Clay 0 0 7 0 1 8 17 0 0
Clinton 0 6 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
Cooper 0 0 1 0 2 0 7 0 0
Daviess 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Gentry 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Grundy 0 8 5 0 0 1 2 0 0
Harrison 0 3 4 0 0 1 1 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Johnson 0 3 3 0 0 7 17 0 0
Lafayette 0 8 2 0 0 0 5 0 0
Linn 0 10 1 0 0 2 4 0 0
Livingston 0 1 1 0 0 3 5 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 6 3 0 0 1 1 0 0
Pettis 0 1 3 0 0 4 9 0 1
Platte 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0
Ray 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Saline 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 0 0
Sullivan 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 77 48 0 4 44 134 0 1
Northeast Adair 0 14 1 0 0 3 5 0 0
Audrain 0 5 7 0 1 2 2 0 0
Boone 0 28 31 0 1 9 33 0 1
Callaway 0 2 4 0 0 2 21 0 0
Clark 1 10 2 0 0 2 2 0 0
Cole 0 13 15 0 1 10 14 0 0
Franklin 0 26 10 0 0 17 5 0 0
Gasconade 1 2 3 0 0 0 1 0 0
Howard 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Jefferson 0 52 37 0 3 12 22 1 2
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lewis 0 2 1 0 0 1 5 0 0
Lincoln 1 2 1 0 0 3 1 0 0
Macon 0 7 9 0 0 2 3 0 0
Marion 0 8 3 0 0 2 8 0 0
Monroe 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Montgomery 0 1 1 0 0 6 1 0 0
Osage 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0
Ralls 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Randolph 0 11 1 0 0 3 12 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0
Scotland 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
Shelby 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 0 0
St Charles 0 18 11 0 0 10 11 0 1
Warren 0 5 1 0 0 2 2 0 0
* Region Total * 4 218 152 0 6 90 158 1 4
Southeast Bollinger 0 5 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
Butler 1 36 11 0 1 7 27 0 0
Cape Girardeau 0 23 12 0 2 2 16 0 0
Carter 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0
58Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
KHM KHO KHU LGS MMD MMH RFA RFP RF2
Southeast Crawford 0 6 1 0 0 3 8 0 0
Dent 0 5 3 0 1 1 11 0 0
Dunklin 0 13 1 0 1 7 17 0 0
Howell 0 8 3 0 0 3 7 0 0
Iron 0 3 1 0 0 1 7 0 0
Madison 0 6 0 5 0 1 4 0 0
Maries 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0
Mississippi 0 1 6 0 0 0 2 0 0
New Madrid 0 6 3 0 0 0 3 0 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 7 8 0 1 1 11 0 0
Perry 0 0 3 0 0 1 3 0 0
Phelps 1 17 3 0 0 3 19 1 0
Pulaski 2 8 3 0 0 4 17 1 0
Reynolds 0 1 2 0 0 0 6 0 0
Ripley 1 7 2 0 0 3 5 0 0
Scott 1 13 9 0 0 0 3 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
St Francois 0 9 2 5 0 5 27 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0
Stoddard 0 4 18 2 0 2 32 0 0
Texas 0 4 1 0 0 4 5 0 0
Washington 0 2 5 0 0 0 14 0 0
Wayne 0 5 4 0 1 0 10 0 0
* Region Total * 6 191 104 12 7 55 263 2 0
Southwest Barry 0 14 0 0 0 7 25 0 0
Barton 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0
Bates 0 3 1 0 0 2 1 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
Camden 2 0 1 0 0 2 4 0 0
Cedar 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Christian 0 8 3 0 0 5 6 0 0
Dade 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Dallas 0 3 0 0 0 2 5 0 0
Douglas 0 1 1 0 0 2 6 0 0
Greene 3 53 10 0 1 27 82 0 2
Henry 0 0 5 0 0 3 6 0 0
Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 4 63 27 0 3 14 59 1 0
Laclede 0 22 6 0 0 3 16 0 0
Lawrence 1 17 3 0 0 7 30 0 0
Mcdonald 0 9 17 0 0 3 12 0 0
Miller 1 9 0 0 0 2 5 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Morgan 0 5 2 0 0 1 3 0 0
Newton 0 18 7 0 1 3 27 0 0
Ozark 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 2 2 0 0 2 9 0 0
St Clair 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
Stone 0 6 0 0 0 6 12 0 1
Taney 0 20 6 0 0 4 21 2 1
Vernon 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 0
Webster 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Wright 0 11 4 0 0 3 6 0 0
* Region Total * 11 279 96 0 5 101 359 3 4
Kansas City Jackson 3 59 70 0 4 48 173 1 0
* Region Total * 3 59 70 0 4 48 173 1 0
St. Louis St Louis City 1 25 27 0 6 11 61 0 4
St Louis County 1 71 37 0 5 17 49 0 5
* Region Total * 2 96 64 0 11 28 110 0 9
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
State Total 26 920 534 12 37 366 1,200 7 18
59Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB RHM
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 4 0 9 0 0 0 0 1
Chariton 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pettis 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Platte 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 7 23 0 9 0 0 0 1 2
Northeast Adair 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Audrain 4 1 0 3 0 0 0 3 2
Boone 9 15 0 7 0 0 2 0 2
Callaway 2 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 1
Clark 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Franklin 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gasconade 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 3 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 5 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1
Schuyler 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Warren 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
* Region Total * 36 49 0 23 0 0 4 3 15
Southeast Bollinger 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Cape Girardeau 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
60Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB RHM
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0
Dent 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howell 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Madison 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perry 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Phelps 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Pulaski 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
Wayne 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 4 26 0 20 0 0 1 4 8
Southwest Barry 0 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cedar 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 1 10 7 16 0 0 1 7 2
Henry 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 1 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 4
Laclede 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lawrence 0 4 6 3 0 0 0 0 1
Mcdonald 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ozark 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
Polk 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taney 0 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
Vernon 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wright 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 6 59 20 38 0 0 1 8 9
Kansas City Jackson 1 11 0 30 0 0 2 4 0
* Region Total * 1 11 0 30 0 0 2 4 0
St. Louis St Louis City 3 6 2 3 0 0 0 12 0
St Louis County 15 14 3 9 0 0 0 0 3
* Region Total * 18 20 5 12 0 0 0 12 3
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 72 188 25 132 0 0 8 32 37
61Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Atchison 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 7
Buchanan 19 4 1 0 0 0 0 74
Caldwell 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
Carroll 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 6
Cass 49 30 1 0 0 3 1 215
Chariton 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
Clay 37 23 0 0 0 2 0 177
Clinton 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 56
Cooper 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 19
Daviess 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 24
De Kalb 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 34
Gentry 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 20
Grundy 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 52
Harrison 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 22
Holt 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 8
Johnson 24 4 0 0 0 1 0 91
Lafayette 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 48
Linn 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 57
Livingston 18 11 0 0 0 0 0 55
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Nodaway 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 46
Pettis 11 7 0 0 0 0 0 72
Platte 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 34
Putnam 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
Ray 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 19
Saline 21 3 0 0 0 1 0 43
Sullivan 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 19
Worth 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 287 129 2 0 0 7 1 1,277
Northeast Adair 14 12 0 0 0 0 0 78
Audrain 20 9 0 1 0 2 0 86
Boone 46 46 2 0 0 3 2 323
Callaway 33 23 0 0 0 1 0 132
Clark 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 50
Cole 31 15 1 0 0 2 1 180
Franklin 67 26 0 0 0 3 1 304
Gasconade 5 2 0 0 0 0 1 37
Howard 4 4 0 0 0 1 0 25
Jefferson 175 114 0 0 0 1 2 626
Knox 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
Lewis 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 30
Lincoln 7 6 0 0 0 0 1 70
Macon 7 9 0 0 0 0 0 58
Marion 20 15 0 0 0 0 0 131
Monroe 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 22
Montgomery 10 9 0 0 0 1 0 36
Osage 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 14
Pike 11 10 0 0 0 1 0 54
Ralls 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
Randolph 26 10 0 0 0 1 0 114
Schuyler 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 11
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
Shelby 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
St Charles 50 55 3 0 0 1 1 297
Warren 19 2 1 0 0 0 0 53
* Region Total * 588 381 7 1 0 17 9 2,785
Southeast Bollinger 16 8 0 0 0 0 0 41
Butler 57 8 0 0 0 1 2 223
Cape Girardeau 70 45 1 0 1 1 3 265
Carter 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
62Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL
Southeast Crawford 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 66
Dent 3 6 0 0 0 2 0 52
Dunklin 27 25 0 0 0 0 0 120
Howell 11 1 0 0 0 2 1 69
Iron 9 3 0 0 0 1 0 27
Madison 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 45
Maries 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 22
Mississippi 12 10 0 0 0 0 0 43
New Madrid 25 11 0 0 0 1 0 70
Oregon 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Pemiscot 22 11 0 0 0 0 0 92
Perry 3 4 0 0 0 2 0 38
Phelps 58 12 0 0 0 2 0 168
Pulaski 23 19 0 0 0 0 0 124
Reynolds 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 23
Ripley 11 6 0 0 0 1 2 53
Scott 33 40 0 0 1 0 0 133
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5
St Francois 35 5 0 0 0 1 1 182
Ste Genevieve 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
Stoddard 14 15 0 0 0 0 0 133
Texas 37 11 0 0 0 2 0 89
Washington 23 11 0 0 0 0 0 111
Wayne 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 54
* Region Total * 541 271 1 0 2 17 9 2,284
Southwest Barry 61 7 0 0 0 0 1 187
Barton 5 1 0 0 0 2 0 23
Bates 12 3 0 0 0 0 1 31
Benton 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 23
Camden 23 3 0 0 2 0 2 83
Cedar 5 8 0 0 0 0 0 29
Christian 34 8 0 0 0 2 1 132
Dade 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 15
Dallas 12 0 0 0 0 1 1 45
Douglas 5 2 0 0 0 0 1 29
Greene 136 48 1 0 0 5 8 789
Henry 15 5 0 0 0 1 4 85
Hickory 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Jasper 132 31 2 0 0 3 5 575
Laclede 37 9 0 0 0 0 0 148
Lawrence 47 17 0 0 2 0 0 183
Mcdonald 28 6 0 0 0 0 1 104
Miller 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 48
Moniteau 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 13
Morgan 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 34
Newton 47 13 0 0 0 0 0 205
Ozark 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 29
Polk 25 5 0 0 0 1 2 86
St Clair 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 38
Stone 12 8 1 0 2 0 0 99
Taney 46 12 2 0 0 1 3 254
Vernon 7 5 0 0 0 3 0 46
Webster 9 3 0 0 1 2 0 45
Wright 33 8 0 0 0 4 0 115
* Region Total * 782 215 7 0 7 27 30 3,501
Kansas City Jackson 324 273 29 0 0 16 23 1,780
* Region Total * 324 273 29 0 0 16 23 1,780
St. Louis St Louis City 130 55 12 1 0 5 13 666
St Louis County 190 102 10 0 0 7 16 937
* Region Total * 320 157 22 1 0 12 29 1,603
Other Icama 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 11
* Region Total * 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 11
State Total 2,844 1,428 68 2 9 96 101 13,241
63Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 21.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit
Group Home/
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other Exits
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 4 0 0 0 4
Caldwell 0 0 2 0 0 2
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 0 2 0 1 3
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 2 3 0 2 7
Clinton 0 0 3 0 0 3
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 1 0 1
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 2 0 2
Harrison 0 0 0 1 0 1
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 1 3 0 0 4
Lafayette 0 0 4 0 0 4
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 1 0 0 1
Nodaway 0 1 2 0 0 3
Pettis 0 2 4 0 2 8
Platte 0 0 1 0 0 1
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 9 0 0 9
Sullivan 0 3 4 0 0 7
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 13 38 4 5 60
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 1 0 1
Audrain 0 1 3 0 1 5
Boone 0 1 4 1 1 7
Callaway 0 0 1 0 0 1
Clark 0 1 4 0 0 5
Cole 0 0 3 0 0 3
Franklin 0 2 3 0 3 8
Gasconade 0 1 0 0 0 1
Howard 0 2 1 0 0 3
Jefferson 0 6 22 1 0 29
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 3 3 0 3 9
Macon 0 1 2 0 1 4
Marion 0 3 1 0 0 4
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 1 1 0 0 2
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 5 2 1 8
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 1 0 0 1
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 0 6 1 0 0 7
Warren 0 0 4 0 0 4
* Region Total * 0 28 59 5 10 102
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 3 0 0 3
Butler 0 4 6 1 0 11
Cape Girardeau 0 2 4 0 0 6
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
64Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 21.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During November 2015
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit
Group Home/
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other Exits
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 1 0 1
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 3 11 0 0 14
Howell 0 2 0 0 1 3
Iron 0 2 0 0 0 2
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 0 1 0 0 1
Oregon 0 4 0 0 0 4
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 2 2 1 0 5
Pulaski 0 1 0 1 0 2
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ripley 1 2 1 1 0 5
Scott 0 2 5 0 0 7
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 0 2 1 0 3
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 3 7 1 0 11
Texas 0 3 0 0 0 3
Washington 0 0 2 0 0 2
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 1 30 44 7 2 84
Southwest Barry 0 6 0 1 0 7
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 4 0 1 0 5
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 0 1 0 1
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 0 5 0 1 6
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 1 0 0 1
Douglas 0 2 1 0 0 3
Greene 17 5 11 3 3 39
Henry 0 0 3 1 0 4
Hickory 0 0 1 0 0 1
Jasper 0 2 9 3 3 17
Laclede 0 4 2 1 2 9
Lawrence 0 0 4 4 0 8
Mcdonald 0 4 2 0 1 7
Miller 0 0 0 0 1 1
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 1 0 0 0 1
Newton 0 1 3 1 0 5
Ozark 0 1 0 0 0 1
Polk 0 0 0 0 1 1
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 5 0 0 5
Taney 0 0 1 2 1 4
Vernon 0 1 0 2 0 3
Webster 0 6 0 0 0 6
Wright 0 0 2 0 0 2
* Region Total * 17 37 50 20 13 137
Kansas City Jackson 6 17 26 4 7 60
* Region Total * 6 17 26 4 7 60
St. Louis St Louis City 0 4 3 0 2 9
St Louis County 0 5 10 3 4 22
* Region Total * 0 9 13 3 6 31
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 24 134 230 43 43 474
65Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 22.
Children Closed from Alternative Care During November 2015
by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing
Returned Other Living with Achieved Total
Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 4 0 0 0 0 4
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 2 2
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 2 0 0 1 0 3
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 4 0 0 2 3 9
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 1 0 0 0 0 1
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 2 0 0 0 0 2
Grundy 2 0 0 0 0 2
Harrison 0 0 0 1 0 1
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 3 0 0 0 0 3
Lafayette 3 0 0 0 0 3
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 1 0 0 0 0 1
Nodaway 5 0 0 0 0 5
Pettis 7 0 0 0 0 7
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 5 0 0 0 0 5
Sullivan 7 0 0 0 0 7
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 46 0 0 4 5 55
Northeast Adair 1 0 1 0 0 2
Audrain 0 0 0 1 0 1
Boone 7 0 0 0 1 8
Callaway 1 0 0 0 0 1
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 0 0 0 3 3
Franklin 6 0 0 0 1 7
Gasconade 1 0 0 0 0 1
Howard 2 0 0 0 0 2
Jefferson 9 0 0 0 3 12
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 6 0 1 2 0 9
Macon 2 0 0 1 1 4
Marion 4 0 0 0 0 4
Monroe 0 0 0 0 2 2
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 2 0 0 0 0 2
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 8 0 0 0 0 8
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 4 0 0 0 3 7
Warren 2 0 0 1 0 3
* Region Total * 55 0 2 5 14 76
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 5 0 0 0 0 5
Cape Girardeau 4 0 0 0 0 4
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 1 0 0 0 0 1
66Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 22.
Children Closed from Alternative Care During November 2015
by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing
Returned Other Living with Achieved Total
Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Southeast Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 14 0 0 0 0 14
Howell 2 0 0 1 0 3
Iron 2 0 0 0 0 2
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 1 0 0 0 0 1
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perry 3 0 0 0 1 4
Phelps 3 0 0 0 0 3
Pulaski 1 0 0 0 0 1
Reynolds 0 0 0 1 0 1
Ripley 3 0 0 0 0 3
Scott 6 0 0 0 0 6
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 9 0 0 0 2 11
Texas 3 0 0 0 0 3
Washington 2 0 0 0 0 2
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 59 0 0 2 3 64
Southwest Barry 7 0 0 0 0 7
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 4 0 1 0 0 5
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 0 1 0 1
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 5 0 0 1 0 6
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 1 1
Douglas 3 0 0 0 0 3
Greene 12 0 0 4 4 20
Henry 1 0 1 0 0 2
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 7 1 0 2 1 11
Laclede 5 0 1 1 1 8
Lawrence 7 0 0 0 0 7
Mcdonald 5 1 0 1 0 7
Miller 0 0 0 1 0 1
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 1 0 0 0 0 1
Newton 2 0 0 0 0 2
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 1 0 0 0 1 2
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taney 4 0 0 0 1 5
Vernon 0 0 1 0 0 1
Webster 4 0 0 0 1 5
Wright 1 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 69 2 4 11 10 96
Kansas City Jackson 23 0 1 1 9 34
* Region Total * 23 0 1 1 9 34
St. Louis St Louis City 3 0 2 2 3 10
St Louis County 17 0 0 5 10 32
* Region Total * 20 0 2 7 13 42
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 9 9
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 9 9
State Total 272 2 9 30 63 376
67Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 23.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of November 2015
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody
Temporary Adoptions
In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total
TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 6 0 0 0 6
Buchanan 5 2 0 0 7
Caldwell 4 0 0 0 4
Carroll 1 0 0 0 1
Cass 22 13 0 0 35
Chariton 2 3 0 0 5
Clay 10 3 0 1 14
Clinton 6 1 0 0 7
Cooper 3 1 0 0 4
Daviess 6 0 0 0 6
De Kalb 6 4 0 0 10
Gentry 0 2 0 0 2
Grundy 1 4 0 0 5
Harrison 2 1 0 0 3
Holt 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 11 0 0 0 11
Lafayette 1 0 0 1 2
Linn 6 0 0 0 6
Livingston 8 0 0 0 8
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 3 5 0 2 10
Pettis 13 3 0 0 16
Platte 2 0 0 0 2
Putnam 4 0 0 0 4
Ray 3 0 0 0 3
Saline 9 0 0 0 9
Sullivan 6 0 0 0 6
Worth 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 140 42 0 4 186
Northeast Adair 14 4 0 0 18
Audrain 22 0 0 1 23
Boone 9 10 0 0 19
Callaway 5 3 0 0 8
Clark 7 1 0 5 13
Cole 23 2 0 0 25
Franklin 35 2 0 2 39
Gasconade 1 0 0 0 1
Howard 8 0 6 0 14
Jefferson 69 28 0 6 103
Knox 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 6 7 0 0 13
Macon 7 0 0 0 7
Marion 20 2 0 0 22
Monroe 5 3 0 0 8
Montgomery 1 0 0 0 1
Osage 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 4 7 0 0 11
Ralls 3 0 0 0 3
Randolph 10 0 0 0 10
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 2 0 1 3
Shelby 1 0 0 0 1
St Charles 36 9 0 3 48
Warren 2 1 0 0 3
* Region Total * 288 81 6 18 393
Southeast Bollinger 3 0 0 0 3
Butler 50 21 0 4 75
Cape Girardeau 11 10 1 1 23
Carter 1 0 0 0 1
Crawford 7 10 0 0 17
68Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 23.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of November 2015
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody
Temporary Adoptions
In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total
TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children
Southeast Dent 6 0 0 0 6
Dunklin 6 3 0 0 9
Howell 2 0 0 0 2
Iron 4 3 0 0 7
Madison 5 10 0 0 15
Maries 8 1 0 0 9
Mississippi 2 0 0 0 2
New Madrid 10 4 0 0 14
Oregon 0 1 0 0 1
Pemiscot 10 2 0 0 12
Perry 2 2 0 0 4
Phelps 35 3 0 0 38
Pulaski 25 0 0 1 26
Reynolds 2 2 0 0 4
Ripley 6 1 0 2 9
Scott 8 2 1 0 11
Shannon 1 0 0 0 1
St Francois 8 9 0 0 17
Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 0 1
Stoddard 7 3 0 0 10
Texas 28 2 0 0 30
Washington 4 7 0 0 11
Wayne 12 2 0 0 14
* Region Total * 263 99 2 8 372
Southwest Barry 24 1 0 0 25
Barton 0 1 0 0 1
Bates 5 4 0 0 9
Benton 1 2 0 0 3
Camden 6 0 0 0 6
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 15 6 0 0 21
Dade 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 8 0 0 1 9
Douglas 0 1 0 0 1
Greene 165 126 1 21 313
Henry 17 3 0 0 20
Hickory 1 0 0 1 2
Jasper 118 12 24 3 157
Laclede 4 4 0 0 8
Lawrence 31 1 0 1 33
Mcdonald 26 5 0 0 31
Miller 3 1 0 0 4
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 36 7 0 3 46
Ozark 3 5 0 1 9
Polk 14 1 0 0 15
St Clair 2 0 0 0 2
Stone 9 3 0 2 14
Taney 52 18 0 0 70
Vernon 2 2 0 1 5
Webster 6 1 0 2 9
Wright 21 0 0 0 21
* Region Total * 569 204 25 36 834
Kansas City Jackson 452 69 4 18 543
* Region Total * 452 69 4 18 543
St. Louis St Louis City 74 17 0 0 91
St Louis County 105 23 1 6 135
* Region Total * 179 40 1 6 226
Other Icama 0 0 33 0 33
* Region Total * 0 0 33 0 33
State Total 1,891 535 71 90 2,587
69Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of November 2015
by Vendor Type and County
Current Licensed
Career Foster Foster Relative/ Newly Number of Vendors
Foster Adoptive Group Foster Kinship Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage
Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 3 5 0 5 8 4 100.00
Atchison 0 0 0 1 3 0 3 4 2 100.00
Buchanan 7 0 0 21 13 0 24 34 32 6.25
Caldwell 0 0 0 4 7 0 7 11 9 22.22
Carroll 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 4 1 300.00
Cass 3 0 1 34 44 1 52 72 82 -12.20
Chariton 0 0 0 4 5 0 6 9 6 50.00
Clay 3 0 0 79 52 7 87 126 112 12.50
Clinton 0 0 0 12 12 0 14 23 19 21.05
Cooper 2 0 0 7 5 0 7 10 6 66.67
Daviess 0 0 0 4 2 0 6 6 14 -57.14
De Kalb 0 0 0 4 6 0 6 9 6 50.00
Gentry 0 0 0 3 3 0 5 6 4 50.00
Grundy 0 0 0 3 8 2 6 11 10 10.00
Harrison 0 0 0 5 4 0 6 8 10 -20.00
Holt 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 3 4 -25.00
Johnson 2 0 0 23 16 2 28 38 38 0.00
Lafayette 1 0 0 12 11 0 12 23 22 4.55
Linn 1 0 0 5 13 0 12 18 15 20.00
Livingston 0 0 0 7 9 0 10 15 5 200.00
Mercer 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 5 -60.00
Nodaway 0 0 0 6 12 2 8 18 11 63.64
Pettis 0 0 0 15 10 0 16 22 26 -15.39
Platte 3 0 0 28 16 1 27 43 43 0.00
Putnam 0 0 0 4 3 1 6 6 5 20.00
Ray 1 0 0 9 14 1 15 22 10 120.00
Saline 0 0 0 0 10 2 6 10 7 42.86
Sullivan 0 0 0 3 7 0 4 9 6 50.00
Worth 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 3 -33.33
* Region Total * 24 0 2 302 295 19 385 572 517 10.64
Northeast Adair 2 0 0 14 13 1 17 25 28 -10.71
Audrain 1 0 0 13 26 3 24 37 20 85.00
Boone 6 0 0 42 45 0 49 85 86 -1.16
Callaway 1 0 0 12 9 1 15 21 32 -34.38
Clark 0 0 0 6 9 2 8 14 4 250.00
Cole 2 0 0 38 25 1 45 61 57 7.02
Franklin 2 0 1 51 35 3 64 85 109 -22.02
Gasconade 0 0 0 5 7 0 6 11 9 22.22
Howard 0 0 0 3 5 0 4 8 4 100.00
Jefferson 4 0 0 49 97 4 88 141 141 0.00
Knox 1 0 0 5 4 0 7 9 11 -18.18
Lewis 0 0 0 4 7 1 4 8 7 14.29
Lincoln 1 0 0 18 14 0 25 32 34 -5.88
Macon 0 0 0 8 15 0 9 21 18 16.67
Marion 3 0 0 37 22 0 30 56 60 -6.67
Monroe 0 0 0 7 10 0 9 16 19 -15.79
Montgomery 0 0 0 2 10 0 10 12 8 50.00
Osage 1 0 0 6 2 0 7 8 10 -20.00
Pike 0 0 0 9 8 0 17 17 17 0.00
Ralls 0 0 0 9 7 1 13 15 14 7.14
Randolph 4 0 0 16 26 0 23 40 35 14.29
Schuyler 0 0 0 3 3 1 3 5 7 -28.57
Scotland 0 0 0 2 5 0 4 6 9 -33.33
Shelby 0 0 0 4 9 1 5 13 11 18.18
St Charles 8 0 0 51 52 4 74 100 105 -4.76
Warren 0 0 0 12 28 1 20 38 26 46.15
* Region Total * 36 0 1 426 493 24 580 884 881 0.34
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 8 11 1 10 18 12 50.00
Butler 1 0 0 15 52 1 36 65 76 -14.47
Cape Girardeau 1 0 1 39 56 3 63 92 76 21.05
Carter 1 0 0 4 3 0 6 7 6 16.67
70Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of November 2015
by Vendor Type and County
Current Licensed
Career Foster Foster Relative/ Newly Number of Vendors
Foster Adoptive Group Foster Kinship Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage
Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Southeast Crawford 1 0 0 10 17 0 17 26 17 52.94
Dent 1 0 0 4 7 0 8 11 14 -21.43
Dunklin 0 0 0 13 22 4 27 35 30 16.67
Howell 0 0 0 22 21 2 29 39 35 11.43
Iron 0 0 0 5 6 0 9 11 17 -35.29
Madison 0 0 0 9 13 0 14 21 18 16.67
Maries 0 0 0 2 5 0 2 7 6 16.67
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 5 6 -16.67
New Madrid 0 0 0 10 18 1 16 27 29 -6.90
Oregon 0 0 0 5 2 0 4 7 8 -12.50
Pemiscot 1 0 0 15 20 0 18 34 31 9.68
Perry 0 0 0 8 10 1 16 18 15 20.00
Phelps 1 0 0 26 30 1 37 53 49 8.16
Pulaski 1 1 0 17 22 0 28 40 39 2.56
Reynolds 0 0 0 3 2 0 5 5 16 -68.75
Ripley 0 0 0 17 21 2 23 36 38 -5.26
Scott 1 0 0 16 29 2 33 44 39 12.82
Shannon 1 0 0 5 1 0 3 6 9 -33.33
St Francois 0 1 0 31 32 2 35 61 53 15.09
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 4 3 0 6 7 4 75.00
Stoddard 0 0 0 21 22 3 27 42 34 23.53
Texas 0 0 0 16 11 1 20 27 29 -6.90
Washington 0 0 0 13 19 2 29 32 27 18.52
Wayne 0 0 0 4 7 0 7 11 13 -15.39
* Region Total * 10 2 1 342 467 26 532 787 746 5.50
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 16 33 3 28 46 41 12.20
Barton 0 0 0 10 11 1 13 20 10 100.00
Bates 1 0 0 12 9 1 11 21 20 5.00
Benton 1 0 0 17 5 1 11 20 28 -28.57
Camden 2 0 1 18 19 0 22 32 34 -5.88
Cedar 0 0 0 9 9 0 12 17 13 30.77
Christian 4 0 0 85 30 4 74 108 105 2.86
Dade 0 0 0 4 3 0 4 7 7 0.00
Dallas 1 0 0 15 8 0 16 23 17 35.29
Douglas 0 0 0 13 10 0 14 20 14 42.86
Greene 6 0 0 228 96 4 172 301 265 13.59
Henry 1 0 0 25 21 1 31 44 36 22.22
Hickory 0 0 0 7 9 1 7 14 12 16.67
Jasper 7 0 0 112 93 6 121 191 203 -5.91
Laclede 3 0 0 22 21 1 28 40 42 -4.76
Lawrence 0 0 0 23 52 4 47 73 61 19.67
Mcdonald 1 0 0 14 24 0 26 35 29 20.69
Miller 0 0 0 5 13 0 13 18 19 -5.26
Moniteau 2 0 0 11 4 0 9 14 14 0.00
Morgan 0 0 0 7 10 0 9 17 15 13.33
Newton 3 0 0 38 48 4 57 83 90 -7.78
Ozark 0 0 0 4 8 0 9 12 9 33.33
Polk 3 0 0 34 21 0 41 52 43 20.93
St Clair 0 0 0 4 7 1 7 10 5 100.00
Stone 2 0 0 26 12 1 24 35 33 6.06
Taney 3 0 0 35 33 1 45 66 72 -8.33
Vernon 0 0 0 2 6 1 6 7 8 -12.50
Webster 0 0 0 28 17 3 24 44 45 -2.22
Wright 1 0 0 16 23 1 26 34 28 21.43
* Region Total * 41 0 1 840 655 39 907 1,404 1,318 6.53
Kansas City Jackson 53 1 1 321 255 19 358 548 523 4.78
* Region Total * 53 1 1 321 255 19 358 548 523 4.78
St. Louis St Louis City 16 0 0 74 81 3 104 149 152 -1.97
St Louis County 27 5 0 155 169 2 201 309 299 3.34
* Region Total * 43 5 0 229 250 5 305 458 451 1.55
State Total 207 8 6 2,460 2,415 132 3,067 4,653 4,436 4.89
71Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 25.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Legal Status
Total
LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 6 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Northwest Andrew 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Atchison 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 11
Buchanan 74 0 0 2 105 0 0 1 41 0 223
Caldwell 16 0 0 0 218 0 0 0 119 0 353
Carroll 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8
Cass 215 0 0 6 237 0 1 1 54 0 514
Chariton 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 32
Clay 177 0 0 14 503 0 0 0 75 0 769
Clinton 56 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 12 0 75
Cooper 19 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 10 0 37
Daviess 24 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 30
De Kalb 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 35
Gentry 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 24
Grundy 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52
Harrison 22 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 24
Holt 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 20
Johnson 91 0 0 1 133 0 0 0 35 0 260
Lafayette 48 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 52
Linn 57 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 58
Livingston 55 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 62
Mercer 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Nodaway 46 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 12 0 106
Pettis 72 0 0 1 122 0 0 0 40 0 235
Platte 34 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 17 0 69
Putnam 25 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
Ray 19 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 28
Saline 43 0 0 0 154 0 1 0 36 0 234
Sullivan 19 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20
Worth 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 1,277 0 0 30 1,582 0 3 4 468 0 3,364
Northeast Adair 78 0 0 0 60 0 1 0 40 0 179
Audrain 86 0 0 3 11 0 1 0 4 0 105
Boone 323 0 0 0 323 0 0 0 191 0 837
Callaway 132 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 141
Clark 50 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 13 0 71
Cole 180 0 0 10 180 0 0 1 85 0 456
Franklin 304 0 0 0 271 0 0 0 128 0 703
Gasconade 37 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 9 0 56
Howard 25 6 0 0 23 0 0 0 15 0 69
Jefferson 626 0 0 4 539 0 0 0 446 0 1,615
Knox 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
Lewis 30 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 42
Lincoln 70 0 0 1 111 0 0 0 68 0 250
Macon 58 0 0 0 44 0 1 0 41 0 144
Marion 131 0 0 1 94 0 0 0 54 0 280
Monroe 22 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 7 0 38
Montgomery 36 0 0 2 51 0 1 0 27 0 117
Osage 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 16
Pike 54 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 8 0 74
Ralls 18 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 26
Randolph 114 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 54 0 230
Schuyler 11 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 4 0 22
Scotland 9 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 11 0 30
Shelby 17 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 2 0 34
St Charles 297 0 0 9 385 0 0 0 176 0 867
Warren 53 0 0 0 77 0 2 0 33 0 165
* Region Total * 2,785 6 0 34 2,314 0 7 1 1,430 0 6,577
Southeast Bollinger 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 49
Butler 223 0 0 3 86 0 1 0 65 0 378
Cape Girardeau 265 1 0 1 168 0 0 0 112 0 547
Carter 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9
Crawford 66 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 8 0 80
72Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 25.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Legal Status
Total
LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 6 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Southeast Dent 52 0 0 0 164 0 0 1 85 0 302
Dunklin 120 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 66 0 236
Howell 69 0 0 3 4 0 0 1 0 0 77
Iron 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27
Madison 45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 46
Maries 22 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 29
Mississippi 43 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 21 0 67
New Madrid 70 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 3 0 77
Oregon 8 0 0 7 85 0 0 0 52 0 152
Pemiscot 92 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 76 0 232
Perry 38 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 42
Phelps 168 0 0 0 26 0 0 2 8 0 204
Pulaski 124 0 0 4 256 0 0 2 88 0 474
Reynolds 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
Ripley 53 0 0 0 98 0 0 2 48 0 201
Scott 133 1 0 0 71 0 0 0 84 0 289
Shannon 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
St Francois 182 0 0 2 361 0 0 2 96 0 643
Ste Genevieve 20 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 22
Stoddard 133 0 0 0 131 0 0 4 152 0 420
Texas 89 0 0 3 13 0 0 1 11 0 117
Washington 111 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 113
Wayne 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
* Region Total * 2,284 2 0 27 1,594 0 1 20 987 0 4,915
Southwest Barry 187 0 0 5 247 0 0 0 65 0 504
Barton 23 0 0 0 88 0 0 0 7 0 118
Bates 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
Benton 23 0 0 2 33 0 0 0 14 0 72
Camden 83 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 88
Cedar 29 0 0 3 43 0 1 0 4 0 80
Christian 132 0 0 3 282 0 0 0 20 0 437
Dade 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
Dallas 45 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 8 0 85
Douglas 29 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 1 0 52
Greene 789 1 0 11 1,025 0 1 46 171 0 2,044
Henry 85 0 0 4 133 0 0 0 45 0 267
Hickory 8 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 41
Jasper 575 24 0 0 721 0 3 0 127 0 1,450
Laclede 148 0 0 6 356 0 0 0 56 0 566
Lawrence 183 0 0 0 190 0 0 0 27 0 400
Mcdonald 104 0 0 0 106 0 0 0 17 0 227
Miller 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 62
Moniteau 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 19
Morgan 34 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 44
Newton 205 0 0 8 330 0 0 0 53 0 596
Ozark 29 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 36
Polk 86 0 0 0 170 0 0 0 35 0 291
St Clair 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38
Stone 99 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 105
Taney 254 0 0 0 129 0 4 0 57 0 444
Vernon 46 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 3 0 59
Webster 45 0 0 2 41 0 0 0 16 0 104
Wright 115 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 86 0 264
* Region Total * 3,501 25 0 47 4,062 0 9 46 848 1 8,539
Kansas City Jackson 1,780 4 18 14 2,351 0 16 34 373 0 4,590
* Region Total * 1,780 4 18 14 2,351 0 16 34 373 0 4,590
St. Louis St Louis City 666 0 0 5 1,248 0 10 4 465 0 2,398
St Louis County 937 1 1 22 1,196 0 9 24 434 0 2,624
* Region Total * 1,603 1 1 27 2,444 0 19 28 899 0 5,022
Other Icama 11 33 0 19 1,886 0 0 0 15 0 1,964
* Region Total * 11 33 0 19 1,886 0 0 0 15 0 1,964
State Total 13,241 71 19 198 16,233 0 55 133 5,020 1 34,971
73Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 26.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Goal
Total
01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
Atchison 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 7
Buchanan 46 7 0 3 14 0 4 74
Caldwell 8 4 0 0 4 0 0 16
Carroll 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
Cass 120 35 0 31 22 4 3 215
Chariton 18 5 0 2 1 0 5 31
Clay 133 13 0 13 16 1 1 177
Clinton 31 7 0 8 5 0 5 56
Cooper 5 4 0 7 1 0 2 19
Daviess 11 6 0 3 4 0 0 24
De Kalb 20 10 0 1 1 0 2 34
Gentry 15 2 0 1 2 0 0 20
Grundy 40 5 0 1 1 0 5 52
Harrison 16 3 0 2 1 0 0 22
Holt 3 0 0 1 0 0 4 8
Johnson 57 11 0 13 5 0 5 91
Lafayette 35 1 0 4 7 0 1 48
Linn 39 6 0 4 3 0 5 57
Livingston 32 8 0 6 5 0 4 55
Mercer 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Nodaway 24 8 0 3 7 0 4 46
Pettis 28 16 0 7 10 0 11 72
Platte 27 2 0 5 0 0 0 34
Putnam 12 4 0 1 5 0 3 25
Ray 10 3 0 1 4 1 0 19
Saline 24 9 0 3 4 0 3 43
Sullivan 11 6 0 1 0 0 1 19
Worth 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 776 182 0 122 122 6 69 1,277
Northeast Adair 46 18 0 5 3 0 6 78
Audrain 35 22 0 13 10 1 5 86
Boone 233 19 0 28 25 3 15 323
Callaway 104 8 0 9 5 0 6 132
Clark 36 8 0 5 1 0 0 50
Cole 110 25 0 24 11 0 10 180
Franklin 186 37 0 46 25 0 10 304
Gasconade 32 1 0 2 0 0 2 37
Howard 8 8 0 3 1 1 4 25
Jefferson 341 97 0 41 116 3 28 626
Knox 6 0 0 1 3 0 0 10
Lewis 18 0 0 9 2 0 1 30
Lincoln 34 13 0 9 4 2 8 70
Macon 37 7 0 7 2 0 5 58
Marion 60 22 0 20 23 2 4 131
Monroe 13 8 0 0 1 0 0 22
Montgomery 21 1 0 11 0 0 3 36
Osage 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
Pike 32 11 0 5 3 1 2 54
Ralls 5 3 0 3 7 0 0 18
Randolph 73 10 0 15 11 1 4 114
Schuyler 6 0 0 1 4 0 0 11
Scotland 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 9
Shelby 13 1 0 1 0 2 0 17
St Charles 182 45 0 40 7 1 22 297
Warren 28 3 0 8 14 0 0 53
* Region Total * 1,680 369 0 306 278 17 135 2,785
Southeast Bollinger 26 3 0 5 5 0 2 41
Butler 82 71 0 31 35 2 2 223
Cape Girardeau 174 21 0 21 26 0 23 265
Carter 5 1 0 2 0 0 0 8
74Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 26.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and Goal
Total
01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Southeast Crawford 35 17 0 3 9 1 1 66
Dent 32 6 0 7 1 0 6 52
Dunklin 75 9 0 11 18 2 5 120
Howell 44 2 0 13 5 2 3 69
Iron 15 7 0 2 3 0 0 27
Madison 17 15 0 1 8 0 4 45
Maries 6 9 0 1 4 0 2 22
Mississippi 26 2 0 1 13 0 1 43
New Madrid 43 14 0 3 10 0 0 70
Oregon 5 1 0 2 0 0 0 8
Pemiscot 47 12 0 6 19 7 1 92
Perry 30 4 0 4 0 0 0 38
Phelps 88 38 0 11 19 2 10 168
Pulaski 73 25 0 11 9 4 2 124
Reynolds 14 4 0 1 2 1 1 23
Ripley 22 7 0 18 6 0 0 53
Scott 101 10 0 3 13 0 6 133
Shannon 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 5
St Francois 122 17 0 19 9 0 15 182
Ste Genevieve 10 1 0 3 0 0 6 20
Stoddard 90 10 0 13 14 1 5 133
Texas 45 30 0 8 6 0 0 89
Washington 89 11 0 3 6 0 2 111
Wayne 30 14 0 5 5 0 0 54
* Region Total * 1,349 362 0 209 245 22 97 2,284
Southwest Barry 136 25 0 14 10 0 2 187
Barton 19 1 0 3 0 0 0 23
Bates 18 9 0 2 2 0 0 31
Benton 14 3 0 3 2 1 0 23
Camden 68 6 0 7 2 0 0 83
Cedar 20 0 0 2 1 1 5 29
Christian 73 21 0 15 19 1 3 132
Dade 10 0 0 1 0 3 1 15
Dallas 29 8 0 7 0 1 0 45
Douglas 20 1 0 5 3 0 0 29
Greene 334 291 0 99 42 3 20 789
Henry 33 20 0 19 9 0 4 85
Hickory 3 1 0 2 2 0 0 8
Jasper 331 130 0 50 24 7 33 575
Laclede 122 8 0 9 8 1 0 148
Lawrence 95 32 0 20 23 0 13 183
Mcdonald 45 31 0 11 11 0 6 104
Miller 34 4 0 7 2 0 1 48
Moniteau 9 0 0 2 2 0 0 13
Morgan 28 0 0 3 3 0 0 34
Newton 132 43 0 11 10 1 8 205
Ozark 9 8 0 3 9 0 0 29
Polk 49 15 0 9 3 1 9 86
St Clair 33 2 0 2 1 0 0 38
Stone 65 12 0 10 3 0 9 99
Taney 124 70 0 28 17 1 14 254
Vernon 28 4 0 9 0 0 5 46
Webster 25 7 0 5 7 0 1 45
Wright 69 21 0 14 11 0 0 115
* Region Total * 1,975 773 0 372 226 21 134 3,501
Kansas City Jackson 854 521 0 177 121 13 94 1,780
* Region Total * 854 521 0 177 121 13 94 1,780
St. Louis St Louis City 357 91 0 105 67 27 19 666
St Louis County 522 128 0 113 66 16 92 937
* Region Total * 879 219 0 218 133 43 111 1,603
Other Icama 3 0 0 2 2 1 3 11
* Region Total * 3 0 0 2 2 1 3 11
State Total 7,516 2,426 0 1,406 1,127 123 643 13,241
75Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 27.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous
Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell
Number of Placements Average
Total Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements
Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2.50
Atchison 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 1.29
Buchanan 21 25 6 6 8 7 0 1 74 2.97
Caldwell 6 2 4 0 2 2 0 0 16 2.75
Carroll 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1.00
Cass 72 55 20 12 18 30 3 5 215 3.63
Chariton 6 7 7 6 1 3 1 0 31 3.23
Clay 76 36 22 10 10 18 4 1 177 2.83
Clinton 17 12 14 3 4 4 2 0 56 3.11
Cooper 3 4 2 1 1 3 2 1 19 5.47
Daviess 4 7 6 4 1 1 1 0 24 3.17
De Kalb 12 13 2 1 0 5 0 1 34 3.06
Gentry 9 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 20 1.65
Grundy 24 16 3 3 2 3 0 1 52 2.58
Harrison 7 9 2 1 0 2 1 0 22 2.82
Holt 3 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 2.00
Johnson 44 17 11 6 6 5 0 0 91 2.15
Lafayette 25 2 6 3 6 3 2 1 48 3.23
Linn 22 14 5 9 3 4 0 0 57 2.60
Livingston 23 17 4 5 2 2 1 1 55 3.02
Mercer 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 2.00
Nodaway 21 12 2 3 2 5 1 0 46 2.70
Pettis 29 7 9 6 8 7 4 2 72 4.32
Platte 11 9 2 2 4 5 1 0 34 3.18
Putnam 8 9 2 4 2 0 0 0 25 2.32
Ray 3 8 3 2 1 2 0 0 19 2.89
Saline 26 3 7 0 2 4 1 0 43 2.42
Sullivan 4 11 0 2 2 0 0 0 19 2.32
Worth 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.00
* Region Total * 493 309 140 91 87 115 24 14 1,277 3.01
Northeast Adair 35 22 6 3 2 7 2 1 78 2.72
Audrain 29 17 4 5 8 14 6 3 86 4.26
Boone 94 88 31 27 12 48 17 5 323 3.75
Callaway 45 29 16 7 15 13 4 3 132 3.65
Clark 13 10 10 6 0 7 3 1 50 4.02
Cole 74 47 21 10 4 15 3 5 180 3.02
Franklin 114 83 31 13 15 29 14 3 304 3.04
Gasconade 11 12 4 7 0 3 0 0 37 2.73
Howard 12 3 1 3 1 1 4 0 25 3.84
Jefferson 235 175 80 51 24 35 13 9 626 2.86
Knox 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 2.10
Lewis 9 8 2 1 3 4 1 2 30 4.50
Lincoln 35 10 3 5 5 10 1 0 70 2.71
Macon 22 18 12 3 1 2 0 0 58 2.24
Marion 40 34 19 7 6 17 6 2 131 3.37
Monroe 13 1 3 3 1 1 0 0 22 2.14
Montgomery 15 11 2 1 1 5 0 1 36 2.97
Osage 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1.00
Pike 26 6 7 1 8 4 2 0 54 2.93
Ralls 6 4 4 0 2 2 0 0 18 2.67
Randolph 41 24 15 14 6 11 1 2 114 3.05
Schuyler 2 3 1 1 1 2 0 1 11 4.45
Scotland 2 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 9 4.44
Shelby 6 3 2 4 0 2 0 0 17 3.12
St Charles 116 80 34 19 7 27 7 7 297 3.11
Warren 17 7 12 1 6 7 0 3 53 4.40
* Region Total * 1,035 696 323 193 128 267 85 49 2,785 3.18
Southeast Bollinger 20 12 5 1 0 0 1 2 41 2.93
Butler 75 67 29 15 16 15 3 3 223 2.88
Cape Girardeau 113 69 27 29 8 14 2 1 265 2.39
Carter 2 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 8 4.00
76Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 27.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of November 2015
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous
Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell
Number of Placements Average
Total Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements
Southeast Crawford 24 8 12 8 4 8 0 1 66 3.12
Dent 21 10 5 3 4 7 0 2 52 3.96
Dunklin 47 34 19 7 4 6 0 3 120 2.83
Howell 22 23 3 9 6 1 2 3 69 3.46
Iron 12 8 1 0 3 1 1 1 27 3.04
Madison 18 10 7 4 1 3 1 1 45 2.93
Maries 10 6 5 0 0 0 1 0 22 2.32
Mississippi 24 12 3 2 0 2 0 0 43 1.81
New Madrid 40 8 8 2 4 5 2 1 70 2.61
Oregon 1 2 0 1 0 1 2 1 8 8.00
Pemiscot 30 23 11 7 7 8 4 2 92 3.54
Perry 17 10 4 2 2 2 0 1 38 2.71
Phelps 72 40 28 10 6 10 1 1 168 2.41
Pulaski 40 35 18 11 5 12 2 1 124 3.02
Reynolds 14 1 3 0 1 2 2 0 23 2.91
Ripley 16 22 6 1 2 5 0 1 53 2.79
Scott 81 30 8 6 4 4 0 0 133 1.80
Shannon 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 6.60
St Francois 63 45 16 19 19 12 5 3 182 3.27
Ste Genevieve 7 3 6 1 0 1 1 1 20 3.80
Stoddard 39 38 23 11 7 12 1 1 133 2.90
Texas 48 16 10 1 3 7 1 1 89 2.33
Washington 37 31 18 8 7 7 1 2 111 2.85
Wayne 25 14 2 4 3 5 0 1 54 2.72
* Region Total * 921 578 277 165 118 151 33 35 2,284 2.82
Southwest Barry 62 41 38 17 11 12 2 3 187 3.03
Barton 8 2 1 3 1 6 2 0 23 4.43
Bates 14 8 3 3 2 1 0 0 31 2.19
Benton 3 7 2 4 3 3 1 0 23 3.70
Camden 22 25 19 4 3 7 1 2 83 3.19
Cedar 10 6 8 3 2 0 0 0 29 2.34
Christian 44 48 15 6 2 11 2 3 132 2.83
Dade 7 2 4 0 2 0 0 0 15 2.20
Dallas 15 12 8 4 0 6 0 0 45 2.82
Douglas 9 4 5 6 1 4 0 0 29 3.07
Greene 235 172 115 74 34 101 30 24 789 3.89
Henry 21 22 13 9 2 6 7 5 85 5.11
Hickory 2 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 8 5.38
Jasper 181 133 91 52 25 60 18 12 575 3.52
Laclede 42 47 26 16 7 5 0 5 148 3.15
Lawrence 60 28 25 21 13 22 11 3 183 3.89
Mcdonald 42 17 15 9 4 11 4 2 104 3.55
Miller 12 11 8 5 4 4 2 2 48 4.60
Moniteau 7 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 13 2.23
Morgan 14 12 1 1 2 1 2 1 34 3.09
Newton 51 48 30 33 10 24 7 2 205 3.53
Ozark 20 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 29 1.52
Polk 33 31 9 2 2 7 2 0 86 2.57
St Clair 17 13 4 1 2 1 0 0 38 1.97
Stone 41 21 9 8 4 11 3 1 99 2.99
Taney 124 43 24 17 16 18 5 7 254 3.11
Vernon 21 17 1 1 0 2 1 3 46 3.65
Webster 25 6 8 2 0 3 0 1 45 2.42
Wright 43 17 20 11 3 18 1 2 115 3.37
* Region Total * 1,185 801 507 314 157 347 101 79 3,501 3.45
Kansas City Jackson 595 413 244 141 110 196 56 16 1,780 3.24
* Region Total * 595 413 244 141 110 196 56 16 1,780 3.24
St. Louis St Louis City 160 169 81 66 44 78 27 41 666 4.64
St Louis County 283 265 125 77 48 79 28 27 937 3.54
* Region Total * 443 434 206 143 92 157 55 68 1,603 4.00
Other Icama 8 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 11 2.91
* Region Total * 8 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 11 2.91
State Total 4,680 3,231 1,697 1,048 692 1,234 355 261 13,241 3.28
77Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County
(FY 2016 Adoptions are Year to Date November 2015)
Total
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Adoptions
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 3 0 0 3
Buchanan 9 2 2 9 5 2 29
Caldwell 16 15 22 11 16 0 80
Carroll 0 0 1 0 0 2 3
Cass 26 18 22 8 14 7 95
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 33 41 55 45 53 13 240
Clinton 0 0 1 0 3 0 4
Cooper 1 3 1 1 0 0 6
Daviess 0 1 2 0 0 0 3
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 3 1 0 0 0 0 4
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Holt 0 0 5 0 0 0 5
Johnson 7 14 19 12 13 7 72
Lafayette 1 0 1 0 0 1 3
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 5 0 4 2 2 3 16
Pettis 13 13 15 7 8 0 56
Platte 2 0 4 0 0 1 7
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 1 1 1 1 0 0 4
Saline 14 11 8 18 20 2 73
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 131 121 164 117 134 40 707
Northeast Adair 10 1 5 3 9 0 28
Audrain 1 0 0 0 7 3 11
Boone 40 20 18 38 35 4 155
Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 5 5
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 5 5
Cole 7 10 21 12 12 14 76
Franklin 18 15 25 25 31 9 123
Gasconade 0 1 0 2 2 0 5
Howard 1 1 3 0 0 0 5
Jefferson 53 44 43 45 46 23 254
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 4 0 0 4
Lincoln 7 4 8 15 11 4 49
Macon 1 0 2 3 5 0 11
Marion 4 9 4 6 15 5 43
Monroe 3 1 0 1 2 0 7
Montgomery 3 4 4 4 1 0 16
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 4 1 0 1 0 6
Ralls 0 0 0 2 2 0 4
Randolph 6 6 4 10 2 2 30
Schuyler 1 0 0 1 0 0 2
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Shelby 1 5 1 0 2 0 9
St Charles 29 28 24 14 32 16 143
Warren 1 4 4 5 7 3 24
* Region Total * 186 157 167 190 222 94 1,016
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 8 4 10 1 12 8 43
Cape Girardeau 19 8 10 11 10 6 64
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
78Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County
(FY 2016 Adoptions are Year to Date November 2015)
Total
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Adoptions
Southeast Dent 7 15 17 13 2 1 55
Dunklin 6 1 2 12 1 1 23
Howell 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Madison 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Maries 2 1 0 0 0 2 5
Mississippi 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
New Madrid 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
Oregon 12 7 8 12 7 0 46
Pemiscot 2 9 4 11 0 1 27
Perry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Phelps 2 1 1 3 11 5 23
Pulaski 32 22 20 20 10 10 114
Reynolds 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Ripley 6 1 8 9 16 14 54
Scott 2 2 5 4 8 0 21
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 32 33 48 37 36 13 199
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stoddard 12 11 13 15 18 2 71
Texas 0 1 2 3 7 2 15
Washington 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 145 117 152 153 145 65 777
Southwest Barry 32 8 27 24 15 3 109
Barton 6 7 7 8 11 1 40
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 5 2 3 6 9 3 28
Camden 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
Cedar 1 8 6 2 5 0 22
Christian 21 48 19 34 25 9 156
Dade 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Dallas 5 5 3 4 2 1 20
Douglas 2 3 0 1 9 1 16
Greene 85 113 119 126 92 68 603
Henry 5 16 12 14 14 5 66
Hickory 3 3 1 2 6 2 17
Jasper 43 54 72 92 70 23 354
Laclede 35 40 39 24 42 10 190
Lawrence 12 12 6 16 20 11 77
Mcdonald 8 11 8 13 11 5 56
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 41 36 23 22 32 14 168
Ozark 0 0 0 0 1 4 5
Polk 13 27 18 9 7 2 76
St Clair 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Stone 0 1 0 0 0 2 3
Taney 8 12 6 18 21 7 72
Vernon 0 0 1 0 6 1 8
Webster 3 7 2 14 3 7 36
Wright 2 2 7 7 3 5 26
* Region Total * 331 416 379 436 404 187 2,153
Kansas City Jackson 214 196 223 218 250 105 1,206
* Region Total * 214 196 223 218 250 105 1,206
St. Louis St Louis City 71 58 63 66 76 15 349
St Louis County 86 82 72 67 76 21 404
* Region Total * 157 140 135 133 152 36 753
Other Icama 2 2 3 5 5 0 17
* Region Total * 2 2 3 5 5 0 17
State Total 1,166 1,149 1,223 1,252 1,312 527 6,629
79Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 16.
Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
Total Entries Total Re Entries
9,0009,2009,4009,6009,800
10,00010,20010,40010,60010,80011,00011,20011,40011,60011,80012,00012,20012,40012,60012,80013,00013,20013,40013,600
No
v-1
3
De
c-1
3
Jan
-14
Feb
-14
Mar
-14
Ap
r-1
4
May
-14
Jun
-14
Jul-
14
Au
g-1
4
Sep
-14
Oct
-14
No
v-1
4
De
c-1
4
Jan
-15
Feb
-15
Mar
-15
Ap
r-1
5
May
-15
Jun
-15
Jul-
15
Au
g-1
5
Sep
-15
Oct
-15
No
v-1
5
Figure 17.
Children Active in Children's Division Custody on the Last day of the Month
November 2013 - November 2015
80Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 18.
Children Closing from Alternative Care During
November 2015 by Reason for Case Closing and Region
Returned Home Other
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
No
v-1
3
De
c-1
3
Jan
-14
Feb
-14
Mar
-14
Ap
r-1
4
May
-14
Jun
-14
Jul-
14
Au
g-1
4
Sep
-14
Oct
-14
No
v-1
4
De
c-1
4
Jan
-15
Feb
-15
Mar
-15
Ap
r-1
5
May
-15
Jun
-15
Jul-
15
Au
g-1
5
Sep
-15
Oct
-15
No
v-1
5
Figure 19.
Adoptions Finalized by Month
November 2013 - November 2015
81Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 11 12 - 15 16 +
Figure 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody as of
November 2015 by Age and Placement Category
Foster Home Other Relative Home Group Home/Res. Care Adoptive Home
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
No
v-1
1
Jan
-12
Mar
-12
May
-12
Jul-
12
Sep
-12
No
v-1
2
Jan
-13
Mar
-13
May
-13
Jul-
13
Sep
-13
No
v-1
3
Jan
-14
Mar
-14
May
-14
Jul-
14
Sep
-14
No
v-1
4
Jan
-15
Mar
-15
May
-15
Jul-
15
Sep
-15
No
v-1
5
Figure 21. Children in Children's Division Custody as of the Last Day of the
Month November 2011 - November 2015 by Placement Category
Foster Home Other Relative Home Group Home Adoptive Home
82Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
20
11
-1
20
11
-2
20
11
-3
20
11
-4
20
12
-1
20
12
-2
20
12
-3
20
12
-4
20
13
-1
20
13
-2
20
13
-3
20
13
-4
20
14
-1
20
14
-2
20
14
-3
20
14
-4
20
15
-1
20
15
-2
20
15
-3
20
15
-4
Exit
s p
er
10
0 C
hild
ren
in
Fost
er
Car
e P
op
ula
tio
n
Figure 22.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody
by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition 1st Quarter 2011 Through 4th Quarter 2015
Adoption Child Independence Other Legal Status Relative Home Other Closing Return Home
83Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 84 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures
Table 14.
• This table includes children entering Legal Status 1 for the first time. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other • Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19,
2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov. • Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 15.
• This table includes children re-entering Legal Status 1 who have had prior Out-of-Home
Placements. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other • Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19,
2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov. • Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 16.
• This data includes children (re)entering (entering and/or re-entering) Legal Status 1.
Table 17. and Table 18.
• Length of Stay is computed for the last continuous period in Legal Status 1 during the month.
Table values, for the length of stay, indicate the average number of months in custody.
Children’s Services Management Report 85 Research and Data Analysis
Table 19.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19,
2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.
• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 20.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only. • Placement Types are: ADF Adoption (by foster parent) ADO Adoption (by other) ADR Adoption (by relative) CFP Career Foster Parent CTO Non-Licensed/Court Ordered Placement DET Detention FAH Foster Adoptive Home FG B Behavioral Foster Family Group Home FG H Foster Family Group Home FG M Medical Foster Family Group Home FHB Behavioral Foster Home FHE Emergency Foster Home FHM Medical Foster Home FHO Foster Home ILA Independent Living Arrangement JHO Juvenile Court Home KHB Kinship Behavioral Home KHM Kinship Medical Home KHO Licensed Kinship Home KHU Unlicensed Kinship Home LGS Legal Guardianship Subsidy MMD Medical Facility MMH Mental Health Facility RFA Residential Treatment Facility RFP Residential Treatment Facility- Initial Placement - No Level RF2 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 2 RF3 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 3 RF4 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 4 RFE Residential Treatment Facility- Emergency
Children’s Services Management Report 86 Research and Data Analysis
Table 20 (contd). RFH Residential Foster Home RFI Residential Treatment Facility- Infant
RFM Residential Treatment Facility-Maternity RFT Residential Treatment Facility-Transitional/Aftercare RHB Behavioral Relative Home
RHM Medical Relative Home RHO Relative Home RHU Unlicensed Relative Home RUN Runaway SCH School TLA Transitional Living Arrangement TLG Transitional Living Group TLS Transitional Living Scattered Site
Table 21.
• This table includes children exiting Legal Status 1 only. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Table 22.
Table includes children closing from all legal status categories.
• Closing categories include the following closing reasons: Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s), CYAC child, Returned Child to
sending state) Achieved Independence - Goal Achieved (Child Independence) Living with Other Relatives – Goal Achieved (Placement with a fit and willing relative) Other Agency - Care and Custody with other Agency Other - Married, Runaway, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Guardianship
and Other
Table 23.
• Legal Status 1, TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) Incomplete includes children with a Goal
of 'AD' and no completed TPR (TPR is not completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father).
• Legal Status 1, TPR Complete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and TPR has been
completed (TPR is completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father). • Temporary Adoptive Custody includes Legal Status 2 children.
Children’s Services Management Report 87 Research and Data Analysis
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Table 24.
• This table includes vendor types of – CF, FA, FG, FH, LA, RH, and KH. • Existing vendor types RH and KH were added to this table in October 2015 and are shown
under the heading Relative/Kinship Home. • Newly Licensed Vendors includes vendors which are licensed during the month and have either
no previous license or one which ended more than five years ago. • The categories “Current # of Licensed Vendors” and “Licensed Vendors Twelve Months Ago”
represent unduplicated vendor counts.
Table 25.
• Legal Status Definitions: LS 1 - Care and custody with Children’s Division (includes temporary custody) LS 2 - Temporary custody with adoptive parents LS 3 - Supervision only by Children’s Division LS 4 - Care and custody with juvenile court/other agency LS 5 - Final custody awarded to adoptive parents LS 6 – Children’s Division relieved of legal responsibility LS 7 - CYAC Child (Children of Youth in Alternative Care) LS 8 - Chafee Independent Living Program LS 9 - Subsidized Guardianship LS V – Voluntary Placement Agreement
Table 26.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Goals are:
01 - Return child to parent(s)/caretaker(s) AD - Adoption 05 - CYAC Child 06 - Child Independence/Independent Living 07 - Guardianship 08 - Live with Other Relatives 09 - Case Plan Goal Not Yet Established / Missing
Table 27.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only. • Table values are children active at the end of the month categorized by the number of
placements experienced in their most recent stay in Legal Status 1.
Children’s Services Management Report 88 Research and Data Analysis
• The number of placements represents the movement of children among distinct vendors. • Short term temporary settings are not counted when the child returns to the previous vendor.
Table 28.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are
counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Figure 18.
• Closing categories includes the following closing reasons:
Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s) Other - Achieved Independence, Living with other Relatives, Other Agency , Married, Runaway, Returned Child to Sending State, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Children of Youth in Alternative Care (CYAC) Child and Other.
Figure 19.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are
counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Figure 20.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
• Age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Figure 21.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Intensive In-Home Services
Table 29.
Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During November 2015
Grouped by Referral County
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 100.00% 9
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Gentry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Lafayette 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pettis 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 11 40.74% 16 59.26% 27
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 7
Audrain 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Boone 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Callaway 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 0 0.00% 4 40.00% 6 60.00% 10
Knox 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 6 85.71% 7
Macon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Marion 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Osage 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Randolph 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Warren 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 26 49.06% 27 50.94% 53
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
for Screening
Referrals Accepted
Accepted
Referrals
Accepted
Referrals Not
90
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 29.
Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During November 2015
Grouped by Referral County
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Dent 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Dunklin 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Phelps 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 5
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Stoddard 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Texas 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Washington 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
* Region Total * 1 2.44% 23 56.10% 17 41.46% 41
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3
Barton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 0 0.00% 6 60.00% 4 40.00% 10
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 3 37.50% 8
Laclede 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Lawrence 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 6 85.71% 7
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Miller 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Moniteau 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Newton 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Taney 0 0.00% 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 6
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Wright 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
* Region Total * 1 1.54% 33 50.77% 31 47.69% 65
Kansas City Jackson 2 22.22% 5 55.56% 2 22.22% 9
* Region Total * 2 22.22% 5 55.56% 2 22.22% 9
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 11
St Louis County 0 0.00% 19 59.38% 13 40.63% 32
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 29 67.44% 14 32.56% 43
State Total 4 1.68% 127 53.36% 107 44.96% 238
Referrals Accepted Referrals Referrals Not
for Screening Accepted Accepted
91
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 30.
Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During November 2015
Grouped by Household County
Families Children Average # At-Risk Average # At-Risk
Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Atchison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Buchanan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Caldwell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cass 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Chariton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Clay 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Clinton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cooper 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
De Kalb 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Gentry 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Grundy 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Harrison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Holt 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Johnson 2 6 3.00 6 3.00
Lafayette 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Linn 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Livingston 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Mercer 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Nodaway 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Pettis 1 4 4.00 1 1.00
Platte 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Putnam 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ray 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Saline 2 4 2.00 4 2.00
Sullivan 1 8 8.00 7 7.00
Worth 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
* Region Total * 11 33 3.00 29 2.64
Northeast Adair 3 7 2.33 7 2.33
Audrain 3 7 2.33 7 2.33
Boone 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Callaway 1 4 4.00 4 4.00
Clark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cole 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Franklin 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Gasconade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Howard 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Jefferson 4 11 2.75 11 2.75
Knox 1 5 5.00 5 5.00
Lewis 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Lincoln 1 8 8.00 1 1.00
Macon 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Marion 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Monroe 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Montgomery 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Osage 2 4 2.00 3 1.50
Pike 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ralls 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Randolph 3 7 2.33 6 2.00
Schuyler 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Scotland 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
St Charles 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Warren 2 7 3.50 3 1.50
* Region Total * 24 66 2.75 53 2.21
Southeast Bollinger 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Butler 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cape Girardeau 2 5 2.50 2 1.00
Carter 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
92
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 30.
Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During November 2015
Grouped by Household County
Families Children Average # of At-Risk Average # of At-Risk
Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dent 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Dunklin 1 5 5.00 5 5.00
Howell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Iron 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Madison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Maries 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Mississippi 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
New Madrid 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Oregon 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Pemiscot 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Perry 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Phelps 2 6 3.00 6 3.00
Pulaski 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Reynolds 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ripley 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Scott 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Shannon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
St Francois 4 22 5.50 8 2.00
Ste Genevieve 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Stoddard 3 6 2.00 6 2.00
Texas 2 5 2.50 4 2.00
Washington 2 3 1.50 2 1.00
Wayne 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
* Region Total * 22 63 2.86 43 1.95
Southwest Barry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Barton 1 3 3.00 2 2.00
Bates 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Benton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Camden 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Cedar 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Christian 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dallas 1 4 4.00 4 4.00
Douglas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Greene 6 8 1.33 7 1.17
Henry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Hickory 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Jasper 3 11 3.67 11 3.67
Laclede 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Lawrence 1 4 4.00 4 4.00
Mcdonald 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Miller 1 3 3.00 2 2.00
Moniteau 2 4 2.00 4 2.00
Morgan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Newton 3 6 2.00 5 1.67
Ozark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Polk 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
St Clair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Stone 1 5 5.00 5 5.00
Taney 3 8 2.67 8 2.67
Vernon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Webster 2 5 2.50 5 2.50
Wright 3 5 1.67 4 1.33
* Region Total * 30 72 2.40 66 2.20
Kansas City Jackson 8 16 2.00 16 2.00
* Region Total * 8 16 2.00 16 2.00
St. Louis St Louis City 10 30 3.00 24 2.40
St Louis County 18 38 2.11 30 1.67
* Region Total * 28 68 2.43 54 1.93
State Total 123 318 2.59 261 2.12
93
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 31.
Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During November 2015
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lafayette 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Platte 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 11 91.67% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 12
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Boone 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Callaway 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Franklin 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Gasconade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Howard 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Jefferson 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lincoln 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Warren 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
* Region Total * 20 74.07% 7 25.93% 0 0.00% 27
Southeast Bollinger 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Butler 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Family Intact Family Not Intact Other
94Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 31.
Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During November 2015
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pulaski 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Francois 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ste Genevieve 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Wayne 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 10 66.67% 5 33.33% 0 0.00% 15
Southwest Barry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Henry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Laclede 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Taney 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Wright 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
* Region Total * 25 86.21% 4 13.79% 0 0.00% 29
Kansas City Jackson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St. Louis St Louis City 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10
St Louis County 19 90.48% 2 9.52% 0 0.00% 21
* Region Total * 28 90.32% 3 9.68% 0 0.00% 31
State Total 95 82.61% 20 17.39% 0 0.00% 115
Family Not Intact Family Intact Other
95Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 32.
Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During May 2015
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Buchanan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lafayette 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Boone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Callaway 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Franklin 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Macon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Marion 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Warren 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 11 64.71% 6 35.29% 0 0.00% 17
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
96Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 32.
Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During May 2015
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Ste Genevieve 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Dade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Laclede 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10
Kansas City Jackson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St. Louis St Louis City 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
St Louis County 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
* Region Total * 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
State Total 36 75.00% 12 25.00% 0 0.00% 48
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
97Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 33.
Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During November 2014
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Franklin 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Gasconade 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Macon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shelby 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Warren 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
* Region Total * 9 75.00% 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 12
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
98Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 33.
Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During November 2014
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Laclede 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Louis County 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
State Total 14 77.78% 4 22.22% 0 0.00% 18
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
99Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 100 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Intensive In-Home Services Tables
Table 31., Table 32., and Table 33.
• Tables include only those families with an exit date during the month in question
and an exit status which is not missing.
• Exit status includes the following status codes:
Family Intact 10 Family Intact
Family Not Intact 12 Child Ran Away
13 Child Moved out of Home (not placed) 14 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (not Court Ordered)
15 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Court Ordered)
16 In Foster Home or Group Home 17 In Residential
18 With DYS (Division of Youth Services) 19 In Juvenile Justice
20 In In-Patient Psychiatric
Other
11 Can't Locate Family 21 Information Not Available
99 Other