33
November 10, 2012 November 10, 2012 Houston Investor Association Presented by: Richard Robert, EVP & CFO 5847 San Felipe, Suite 3000 Houston, Texas 77057 FAX: 832-327-2260 Mobile: 281-831-9680 Email: [email protected] NYSE: VNR

November 10, 2012

  • Upload
    tamera

  • View
    27

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

November 10, 2012. Houston Investor Association Presented by: Richard Robert, EVP & CFO 5847 San Felipe, Suite 3000 Houston, Texas 77057 FAX: 832-327-2260 Mobile: 281-831-9680 Email: [email protected]. NYSE: VNR. Forward-Looking Statements. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: November 10, 2012

November 10, 2012November 10, 2012

Houston Investor Association

Presented by:Richard Robert, EVP & CFO5847 San Felipe, Suite 3000

Houston, Texas 77057FAX: 832-327-2260

Mobile: 281-831-9680Email: [email protected]

NYSE: VNR

Page 2: November 10, 2012

2

Forward-Looking StatementsForward-Looking StatementsStatements made by representatives of Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC during the course of this presentation that are not historical facts are forward looking statements, including (but not limited to) statements about the acquisition (including its benefits, results and effects), the related financing plans, whether and when the acquisition will be consummated, the operating results of Encore Energy Partners LP following the acquisition and statements with respect to future distributions. These statements are based on certain assumptions and expectations made by the Company which reflect management’s experience, estimates and perception of historical trends, current conditions, anticipated future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those implied or anticipated in the forward looking statements. These include risks relating to the satisfaction of the conditions to closing of the acquisition, uncertainties as to timing, financial performance and results, our indebtedness under our revolving credit facility, availability of sufficient cash to pay our distributions and execute our business plan, prices and demand for oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids, our ability to replace reserves and efficiently develop our reserves, our ability to make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward looking statements. See “Risk Factors” in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and Item 1A. of Part II “Risk Factors” in our subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and any other public filings and press releases. Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events.

This presentation has been prepared as of November 8, 2012.

Page 3: November 10, 2012

Key MLP Investor BenefitsKey MLP Investor Benefits

4 Specific Investor Benefits

High Current Income

6.2% average current yield for the AMZ MLP Index(1)

Growth Potential

398.3% total return for the AMZ MLP Index since 2002 (2)

Tax Advantaged Distributions

Largely a Return of Capital

Inflation Protection

Distribution Growth historically exceeds CPI/PPI

Source: Alerian MLP Index database. Market data as of 11/08/2012. (1) Represents the weighted average yield of the Alerian MLP Index (AMZ). (2) Represents Alerian MLP Total Return Index (AMZX) from 10/30/2002 to 11/02/2012.

3

Page 4: November 10, 2012

Where Are MLPs Today?Where Are MLPs Today?

MLPs remain attractive for three key reasons

1) Attractive valuations

Still within historical average yields and yield spreads

Still within historical averages EV/EBITDA and Price/DCF multiples

Attractive to other yield alternatives: REITs, Utilities and Corporate Bonds

2) Earnings Strength / Stability

MLP earnings are largely derived from fixed fee contracts or have the ability to hedge away a large portion of commodity risk

3) High and Growing Dividends (Defense and Offense)

High dividends provide protection in an uncertain market

Growing dividends encourage upside pricing movement while providing a powerful inflation hedge

4

Page 5: November 10, 2012

Relative Performance Since 1/01/2001Relative Performance Since 1/01/2001

+202.3%

+103.8%

+23.5%

+36.1%

+4.3%

-23.9%

+138.9%

-18.2%

(1)

Source: Bloomberg database. Market data as of 11/08/2012. (1) MSCI World Index excludes the United States.

-100%

-75%

-50%

-25%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

125%

150%

175%

200%

225%

J an-01 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Nov-06 Nov-07 Nov-08 Nov-09 Nov-10 Nov-11 Oct-12

BAML HY Index Alerian MLP S&P 500 Utilities

S&P Small Cap 600 Dow J ones-UBS Commodity Index MSCI World Index

S&P 500 MSCI US REIT Index

(1)

5

Page 6: November 10, 2012

AMZ MLP Index Spread to MSCI REIT Index

(400)

(300)

(200)

(100)

0

100

200

300

400

500

J an-01 May-03 Sep-05 J an-08 May-10 Sep-12

(Spr

ead

in B

asis

Poi

nts)

Historical Average: 146bps

(200)

(100)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Jan-01 May-03 Sep-05 Jan-08 May-10 Sep-12

(Spr

ead

in B

asis

Poi

nts)

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

J an-01 May-03 Sep-05 J an-08 May-10 Sep-12

(Spr

ead

in B

asis

Poi

nts)

AMZ MLP Index Spread Over 10-Year Treasury

MLPs currently at 127bps

above historical average

AMZ MLP Index Spread to BBB Bond Index (1)

Source: Alerian MLP Index and FactSet databases. Market data as of 11/01/2012.(1) Bank of America / Merrill Lynch BBB Bond Index.

Historical Average: 326bps

Historical Average: 126bps

Current Spread 290bps

Current Spread 357bps

MLP Yield Spreads Still at Attractive LevelsMLP Yield Spreads Still at Attractive Levels

6

Page 7: November 10, 2012

2.9%

4.0%3.7%

4.8%

6.0%

7.4%7.1%

7.0%

9.6%10.0%

11.0%11.3%

12.6%13.3%

0.0%

3.0%

6.0%

9.0%

12.0%

15.0%

Public GP Entities

(1)

Small-cap

Midstream /

Pipeline (2)

Large-cap

Midstream /

Pipeline (3)

Upstream (4) Propane (5) Gas Storage (6) Coal (7)

4.1%

7.1%

9.1%

12.2%

7.5%

6.3%

10.0%

Source: FactSet, as of 11/08/2012.(1) Includes: AHGP, XTXI, ETE, KMI, NSH, TRGP.(2) Includes: AMID, APL, BKEP, CQP, CHKM, CPNO, CMLP, XTEX, EROC, GEL, GLP, HEP, NRGM, MWE, MMLP, OILT, RGP, RRMS, SXL, NGLS, TLLP, TCLP, TLP, WES.(3) Includes: BWP, BPL, EPB, EEP, ETP, EPD, KMP, MMP, NS, OKS, PAA, SEP, WPZ.(4) Includes: ARP, BBEP, EVEP, LGCY, LRE, LINE, MEMP, MCEP, PSE, VNR, QRE.(5) Includes: NKA, PNG.(6) Includes: ARLP, NRP, PVR, OXF, RNO.(7) Includes: APU, FGP, NRGY, NGL, SPH.

Current Yields

Current Yields Across MLP SegmentsCurrent Yields Across MLP Segments

7

Page 8: November 10, 2012

Advantages of Vanguard’s LLC StructureAdvantages of Vanguard’s LLC Structure

Characteristics VNR TypicalMLP

TypicalCorporation

Non-Taxable Entity No

Tax Shields on Distributions/Dividends Distribution Distribution

TaxableDividend

Tax Reporting Schedule K-1

Schedule K-1

Form 1099

General Partner No No

Incentive Distribution Rights (IDRs)

NoUp to 50%

No

Attractive Estate Planning Tool No

8

Page 9: November 10, 2012

9

Our Successful Execution of the E&P MLP StrategyOur Successful Execution of the E&P MLP Strategy

High Quality, Low Risk Asset Portfolio

Geographically diverse portfolio of long life assets, well positioned in most of the mature US Basins

136.2 MMBoe total proved reserves, 72% proved developed and 15 year Proved R/PBalanced commodity portfolio – transitioned portfolio from 100% gas at IPO to approximately 46% liquids

Low capital requirements to maintain cash flow going forward

$47 million capital expenditure program for 2012 which is approximately 20% of 2012E Adjusted EBITDA

Disciplined Acquisition

Strategy

15 strategic acquisitions since the IPO, including the recent acquisition of ENP and the Woodford/Fayetteville acquisition

Average acquisition price of ~$10.45/Boe and captured margins of ~$47.70/Boe

Acquisitions have supported 41% distribution growth since 2008 while improving overall coverage and credit position

We review between 125-150 and evaluate approximately 50 acquisition candidates each year

Active Hedging Program

Approximately 85% of expected oil production hedged through 2014 at FLOOR PRICE of $91.50 per barrel

Approximately 85% of expected natural gas production hedged through 1H 2017 at $5.11 per MMBtu

Acquisition strategy incorporates active hedging component to “lock in” anticipated margins

Strong Credit Profile

Well capitalized balance sheet with sufficient liquidity and spending coverage

VNR is not outspending cash flow like many resource play focused peers

Management commitment to maintaining long-term leverage of less than 3.0x Debt / EBITDA

No General Partner or incentive distribution rights (IDRs)

Proven Management Team

with Extensive Experience

Extensive experience in acquisition integration, development and operation of oil and gas assets – demonstrated at Vanguard and previous companies

Continuing to build team and infrastructure to support VNR’s growing company and platform

Page 10: November 10, 2012

10

Overview of Vanguard Natural Overview of Vanguard Natural ResourcesResources

Upstream oil & gas LLC, headquartered in Houston, TexasInitial Public Offering – “VNR” – October 2007 (Total Enterprise Value of ~$240mm)Fifteen strategic acquisitions totaling ~$2.1bn expanded geographic profile and commodity diversity (including merger with Encore Energy Partners LP and Arkoma Basin acquisition)

Instituted a monthly distribution beginning with the July 2012 distributionMonthly distribution of $0.20 per unit ($2.40 annualized) yields approximately 8.6% at current price; Increased distributions ~41% since IPO

Diverse portfolio of mature, long life oil and gas properties, combined with a multi-year hedging program provide stable cash flow and support distribution growth

No General Partner or incentive distribution rights (IDRs)Reduces cost of capital

* Proved reserves as of 6/30/2012 based on internal reserve report.(1) Market data as of 11/8/2012 includes 420,000 Class B units.(2) Debt figure as adjusted for September 2012 VNR equity follow-on.

~136 MMBoe total proved reservesPre-Arkoma Q2 2012 Production: ~12.3 MBoe/dCurrent Daily Production: 24.6 MBoe/d2012E Production: 18.8 MBoe/d2013E Production: 23.2 MBoe/d~72% proved developed ~15 year Proved R/P

~46% liquids / 54% gas

($ in millions)

Company Profile VNR

UNITS OUTSTANDING (1) 59.083

EQUITY MARKET CAP (1) $1,653.1

TOTAL DEBT (2) 901.7

ENTERPRISE VALUE $2,554.8

Page 11: November 10, 2012

Recent Investor Friendly Events Recent Investor Friendly Events

Initiated monthly distribution policy

Commenced with July 2012 distribution and paid on September 14, 2012

Previously paid quarterly distributions

Established a Direct Reinvestment Plan (DRIP)

Established Direct Common Unit Purchase Plan (PLAN)

The Plan is administered through American Stock Transfer (AST)

Online registration is available at www.amstock.com or 866-673-8052

11

Page 12: November 10, 2012

The Power of the DRIPThe Power of the DRIPThe below example looks at two identical investments over a 20 year period….one

with a DRIP and the other not

Initial Unit Price $28.50Units Bought 1,000 Initial Monthly Distribution $0.20Yield 8.4%Distribution Annual Increase 5.0%Unit Price Annual Increase 5.0%

Beginning Investment $28,500.00Cumulative Distributions (Reinvested) $232,275.35Ending Investment $385,771.69Total Return 1,253.6%

$200

$2,688

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

First Monthly Distribution Last Monthly Distribution

$200$505

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

First Monthly Distribution Last Monthly Distribution

1,244%

153%

12

Initial Unit Price $28.50Units Bought 1,000 Initial Monthly Distribution $0.20Yield 8.4%Distribution Annual Increase 5.0%Unit Price Annual Increase 5.0%

Beginning Investment $28,500.00Cumulative Distributions $79,358.29Ending Investment $151,376.37Total Return 431.1%

Page 13: November 10, 2012

13

Note: Proved reserves as of 6/30/2012 based on internal reserve report. Production represents 2011 average daily net production. Pro forma for exchange of Appalachian assets and recent Arkoma Basin acquisition. Percent operated statistics are computed based on cash flow.(1) Includes ~12.7 Mboe/d of current production from the Woodford/Fayetteville Shale acquisition.

Geographically Diversified Reserve BaseGeographically Diversified Reserve Base

PERMIAN BASIN

WILLISTON BASIN

BIG HORN BASIN

VNR Major Producing Fields

Core Areas

Permian Basin• Proved Reserves: 28.5

MMBoe• 51% oil and 85% Proved

Developed• 5.1 MBoe/d net production• 85% operated

Mississippi – Parker Creek• Proved Reserves: 2.7

MMBoe • 95% oil and 76% Proved

Developed• 0.6 MBoe/d net production• 90% operated

South Texas Proved Reserves: 7.6 MMBoe

• 59% gas and 63% Proved Developed

• 1.1 MBoe/d net production• 0% operated

Big Horn Basin• Proved Reserves: 24.0 MMBoe• 85% oil and 96% Proved

Developed• 3.9 MBoe/d net production• 93% operated

Williston Basin• Proved Reserves: 5.8 MMBoe• 93% oil and 95% Proved

Developed• 0.9 MBoe/d net production• 70% operated

Proved Reserves by Area

136 MMBoe

• 136.2 MMBoe proved reserves• 54% gas and 72% proved developed • Proved R/P of ~15 years• Operate ~75% of cash flow

Overview

MISSISSIPPI

Arkoma Basin• Proved Reserves: 67.6

MMBoe• 82% gas and 57% Proved

Developed• 13.0 MBoe/d net production

(1)• 43% operated

SOUTH TEXAS

ARKOMA BASIN

Arkoma50%

Permian 21%

Big Horn18%

S. Texas5%Williston

4%Mississippi

2%

Page 14: November 10, 2012

14

$396

$654

$389

$235 $225 $225 $202 $212

$1,148

$541

$1,396

$707$620

$34$76 $72 $84

$550$639

$545

$0

$400

$800

$1,200

$1,600

BRY SFY SD LPI OAS VNR BBEP LGCY EVEP LINE

How We Spend CapitalHow We Spend CapitalDisciplined approach to capital spending – focus on maintaining cash flow from mature, long lived fields

By contrast, resource players invest in growth to support equity valuation

The nature of our capital program is inherently less risky due to the lengthy production histories in the fields we operate

We grow production primarily through accretive acquisitions of low-risk producing properties, rather than through the drillbit

Our capital spending as a percent of 2011A EBITDA is best-in-class

2012E capital budget of $47 million – approximately 20% of 2012E Adjusted EBITDA

2011 Adjusted EBITDA 2011 Capex(2)

VNR 15%E&P MLPs(1) 49%Resource Players 172%

EBITDA / Capex 1.0x 0.7x 0.5x 0.6x 0.4x 6.6x 3.0x 2.8x 2.5x 1.8x

Capital Spending vs. Cash FlowResource Players E&P MLPs

Source: Company filings.Note: VNR adjusted EBITDA includes the non-controlling interest of ENP.(1) Excludes VNR.(2) Represents development and exploration expenses, excluding acquisitions.

Page 15: November 10, 2012

15

Our Acquisition StrategyOur Acquisition Strategy

The U.S. has a large inventory of mature oil and natural gas basins which provide significant opportunity for future growth and consolidation

Current E&P opportunity set is comprised of an estimated $1.5 trillion of mature properties, which is substantially more than the U.S. midstream sector

Approximately $40 billion of E&P assets transacted each year since 2007

Vanguard’s Acquisition Strategy is to:

Acquire mature oil and gas properties with the following characteristics:

Stable, long life production with a shallow decline

High percentage of proved developed producing reserves

Long reserve life

Step-out development opportunities for additional growth

Efficiently manage the oil and gas assets with focus on maintaining cash flow levels

Reduce commodity price and interest rate risk through hedging

Return cash flow through distribution payments to unitholders

Page 16: November 10, 2012

Our Successful Acquisition Track RecordOur Successful Acquisition Track Record

16

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012*

$126.8$105.8

$494.3

$1020.5

$782.5

* 2012 includes the recently announced natural gas and liquids acquisitions in Colorado in Wyoming for $335 million with an anticipated close date on or before December 31, 2012.

Page 17: November 10, 2012

17

AcquisitionEffective Date

Region

Adj. Purchase Price ($ mm)

Proved Reserves/PDP(1) Key Features

Apache Jan 2008 Permian $73.4 4.4 MMBoe / 90% PDP 83% oil

Dos Hermanos Jul 2008 South Texas $53.4 20 Bcfe / 65% PDP 98% natural gas

SUN TSH Jul 2009 South Texas $50.8 27 Bcfe / 74% PDP 55% natural gas

Ward County Oct 2009 Permian $55.0 3.2 MMBoe / 65% PDP 83% oil

Parker Creek May 2010 Mississippi,TX & NM

$114.3 4.7 MMBoe / 61% PDP 96% oil

Encore ― Acquisition

*Encore ― Merger

Dec 2010

*Dec 2011

Permian, Williston, Arkoma & Big Horn

Basins

$380.0

*$814.0additional

43.4 MMBoe / 91% PDP 67% oil & NGLs

Miscellaneous Q1 2011 Permian $13.0 0.67 MMBoe / 100% PDP 100% oil

Permian May 2011 Permian $81.4 5.5 MMBoe / 100% PDP 70% oil & NGLs

Permian May 2011 Permian $14.8 1.3 MMBoe / 51% PDP 87% oil & NGLs

Wyoming June 2011 Big Horn $27.7 25 Bcfe / 90% PDP 65% natural gas

TX, LA Aug 2011 Gulf Coast $47.6 2.1 MMBoe / 100% PDP 83% oil & NGLs

Montana, N. Dakota Sept 2011 Williston $7.6 0.53 MMBoe / 100% PDP 97% oil

Parker Creek Dec 2011 Mississippi $14.4 0.46 MMBoe / 85% PDP 100% oil

Wyoming Mar 2012 Big Horn $13.5 0.848 MMBoe / 91% PDP 100% oil

Oklahoma April 2012 Arkoma Basin $434 402 Bcfe / 57% PDP 82% natural gas

Colorado and Wyoming(2) Oct 2012 Piceance, Powder River & Wind River Basins

$335 300.4 Bcfe / 80% PDP 86% natural gas

Our Successful Acquisition Track RecordOur Successful Acquisition Track Record

* Purchase price adjusted downward for distributions received on ENP units and includes debt as of 11/30/2011.(1) Proved reserves and proved developed producing (PDP) numbers are calculated as of the acquisition closing date based on internal estimates.(2) Colorado and Wyoming recently announced acquisition is anticipated to close on or before December 31, 2012.

We review between 125-150 and evaluate approximately 50 acquisition candidates each year

Page 18: November 10, 2012

18

Barrett Acquisition in Colorado and WyomingBarrett Acquisition in Colorado and Wyoming

Assets located in the Piceance Basin in Colorado and the Powder River and Wind River Basins in Wyoming

Total proved reserves of ~300 Bcfe (80% PDP)

Current net production of ~65 MMcfe/d

Reserve to production ratio of 13 years

~184,000 net acres in the Wind River Basin (12% held by production); ~67,000 net acres in the Powder River Basin (93% held by production); and ~15,000 net acres in the Piceance Basin (95% held by production);

Vanguard intends to significantly hedge the expected natural gas and oil production through 2016 and the expected natural gas liquids production in 2013

Immediately accretive to cash flow

Wind River & Powder River, WY Piceance Basin, CO

Page 19: November 10, 2012

19

Arkoma Basin AcquisitionArkoma Basin Acquisition

Assets located in the Woodford Shale and Fayetteville Shale plays

Total proved reserves of ~402 Bcfe (57% PDP)

Current net production of ~71 MMcfe/d (includes ~650 Bbl/d of NGLs)

Reserve to production ratio of 15 years

~71,300 net acres (89% held by production)

~180 drilling locations with an average 22.5% working interest (modeled with ~$22 million in capital expenditures per year)

Restructured acquired hedges to cover ~100% of expected proved production for the next five years at $5.04/MMBtu beginning in August 2012

Immediately accretive to cash flow

Operated AcreageNon-operated Acreage

Fayetteville Shale

Woodford Shale

Page 20: November 10, 2012

20

Total Proved Reserves of ~136.2 MMBoe (~817 Bcfe)

PDP reserves of ~95 MMBoe (~570 Bcfe) is ~69% of total Proved Reserves

Pro Forma Reserve SummaryPro Forma Reserve Summary

By Reserve Mix

Note: Proved reserves as of 6/30/2012 based on internal reserve report. Sum of categories may not add to total due to rounding.

By Commodity MixStandalone Pro Forma for Arkoma Standalone Pro Forma for Arkoma

Oil62%

Gas27%

NGLs11%

Oil32%

Gas54%

NGLs14%

PDP69%

PDNP3%

PUD28%

Oil NGL Gas Total(MMBl) (MMBl) (Bcf) (MMBoe)

PDP 37 9 291 95 PDNP 2 0 11 4 PUD 5 10 138 38

Total Proved 43 20 439 136

PDP82%

PDNP5%

PUD13%

Page 21: November 10, 2012

21

Experienced Management TeamExperienced Management TeamName Title Prior Affiliations

Years of Experience

Scott W. Smith President and CEO• Ensource Energy• The Wiser Oil Company• San Juan Partners

>32

Richard A. Robert EVP and CFO• Enbridge USA• Midcoast Energy Resources• Various energy-related entrepreneurial ventures

>20

Britt PenceSenior Vice Presidentof Operations

• Anadarko Petroleum• Greenhill Petroleum• Mobil

>28

Mark Carnes Director of Acquisitions• Synergy Oil & Gas• Petromark• Torch Energy Advisors

>35

Chris Raper Land Manager• Synergy Oil & Gas• Amoco Production

>33

Rod Banks Marketing Manager

• Apache Corporation• Mariner Energy• Producers Energy Marketing• Coastal Gas Marketing• ORYX Energy Company

>32

Page 22: November 10, 2012

Financial OverviewFinancial Overview

Page 23: November 10, 2012

23

(1) Proved reserves as of 6/30/2012 based on internal reserve report. (2) Amounts illustrated reflect ENP and VNR proved reserves and production on a consolidated basis. Pro forma for exchange of Appalachian assets.(3) Pro forma for the recent Arkoma Basin acquisition.(4) Based on updated 2012E and 2013E guidance announced on 8/2/2012.(5) Adjusted EBITDA pro forma for ENP acquisition but does not reflect adjustments for Arkoma acquisition.(6) Annualized quarterly distribution.

Summary Operating PerformanceSummary Operating Performance

$30$49 $56

$80

$225$245

$278

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012E2013E

11 18 24

69 73

136

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Proved Reserves (MMBoe)

1,9352,701 3,335

4,721

11,946

18,767

23,242

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012E2013E

Average Annual Production (Boe/d)

Adjusted EBITDA ($mm)

$1.70$1.89 $2.03 $2.19

$2.31 $2.39

$0.00

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Distribution Growth ($ / unit)

1,136% Growth

1,101% Growth

41% Increase

(1)

(2)

(6)(5)

827% Growth

(2)(3) (4)

(4)

(4)

(4)

$2.40

Page 24: November 10, 2012

24

Disciplined Financial StrategyDisciplined Financial Strategy

Maintain conservative capital structure and sufficient liquidity

Availability under Revolver as of 10/8/2012 of ~$580 million, pro forma for September follow-on

offering and October senior notes add-on offering

Target Debt / EBITDA of less than 3.0x

Active management of debt levels by periodic access to the equity markets as needed

Utilize excess cash flow to reduce revolving debt levels

Prudent management of commodity price risk through multi-year hedging program

Approximately 85% of expected oil production hedged through 2014 at a FLOOR PRICE of $91.50 per

barrel

Approximately 85% of expected natural gas production hedged through the 1H 2017 at $5.11 per

MMBtu

Acquisition strategy incorporates active hedging component to “lock-in” anticipated margins

Prudently seek acquisitions utilizing our low cost of capital

Accretive acquisitions of long life oil and gas assets

Maintain a prudent coverage ratio to provide distribution stability and “comfortable” growth

Maintain strong relationships with a diversified bank syndicate

Currently have 21 banks in the Revolver

Page 25: November 10, 2012

25

$127 $106

$494

$882

$448

$0

$150

$300

$450

$600

$750

$900

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

(1) Encore merger purchase price adjusted downward for distributions received on ENP units and includes debt as of 11/30/2011.

Acquisition Financing StrategyAcquisition Financing StrategyVanguard’s long-term strategy is to fund its acquisition program with approximately 60% equity and 40% debt, de-levering the company over time via equity issuances and utilizing excess cash flow to pay down debt

To date, Vanguard has issued ~49mm units for a total of approximately $1.2bn in net proceeds, including ~$487mm for the second step of the Encore merger

~58% of the total acquisition value for transactions has been financed with equity (including $182.4 million in equity raised in September 2012)

(1)

Cum.: $21 $117 $391 $879 $1,201Cum.: $127 $233 $727 $1,609 $2,057

$21

$96

$274

$488

$322

$0

$150

$300

$450

$600

$750

$900

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Total of ~$2.1bn

Total of ~$1.2bn

Page 26: November 10, 2012

26

Hedging PhilosophyHedging Philosophy

Hedge commodity prices on estimated production from acquisitions for three to five years upon signing the Purchase and Sale Agreement to protect rate of return from price fluctuations

Opportunistic hedging program to extend hedge positions as existing hedges roll off

Reduce cash flow volatility and protect distribution levels

Primary use of swaps and costless collars, with the addition of three-way collars to provide higher floor pricing

Interest rate risk also mitigated through hedging

Page 27: November 10, 2012

27

$60.42 $60.48

$56.12

$80.28

$92.82

$67.41

$78.85

$84.87

$51.62

$81.72

$92.27 $93.42

$98.49

$35.14

$16.68 $16.02

$11.29

$17.19

$24.32

$18.75 $14.85 $14.37

$6.63

$22.67

$14.34

$31.21

$15.92

$5.09

$43.74 $44.46 $44.83

$63.10

$68.50

$48.66 $63.99 $70.50

$44.99

$59.05 $77.93

$62.21 $82.57

$30.05

$0.00

$10.00

$20.00

$30.00

$40.00

$50.00

$60.00

$70.00

$80.00

$90.00

$100.00

Apache(12/21/07)

DosHermanos(7/21/08)

SUN TSH(7/21/09)

WardCounty

(11/30/09)

ParkerCreek

(5/3/10)

Encore(11/17/10)

Permian(6/22/11)

Permian(8/15/11)

Wyoming(9/1/11)

Gulf coast(8/31/11)

Montana /N. Dakota(12/1/11)

Mississippi(12/22/11)

Wyoming(3/31/12)

Arkoma(6/29/12) *

NYMEX 5 Year WAVG Forward Strip Price on a Boe Basis Acquisiton Cost per Boe

Locking in Margins Provides StabilityLocking in Margins Provides StabilityThrough the use of hedging, Vanguard is able to lock in significant acquisition margins for the foreseeable future, helping to insure distribution stability

* Arkoma Basin acquisition adjusted for value of the hedges acquired.

Page 28: November 10, 2012

28

More than 85% of expected crude oil proved production hedged thru 2014 at a weighted average FLOOR price of $91.50 per barrel

Use a combination of swaps, collars and three-way collars

Hedges Mitigate Commodity Price RiskHedges Mitigate Commodity Price Risk

Note: Hedge prices reflect a weighted average of swap prices, floor prices on collars and puts and long put prices on three way collars. Excludes NGL production. In 2013, Vanguard sold puts on 378,400 Bbls at a weighted average price of $60.47. In addition, Encore sold puts on 250 bbl/d for 2012-2013 at $65.00. Weighted average floor price includes a $3.00 / Bbl premium on a 1,000 Bbl/day in 2013-2014 only if the monthly oil price settles between $70.00 - $110.00.

52%58% 53%

7%

14% 3%

29% 30%

19%

10%

5% 9%28%

83%

$89.50 $92.45 $92.81 $100.00

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

2012 2013 2014 2015

MB

bls

Swaps Collars Three Way Collars Put Spreads Unhedged

Page 29: November 10, 2012

29

Approximately 85% of expected natural gas proved production hedged thru the first half of 2017 at a weighted average floor price of $5.11 per MMBtu

Primarily use NYMEX and basis swaps

Hedges Mitigate Commodity Price RiskHedges Mitigate Commodity Price Risk

Note: Hedge prices reflect a weighted average of swap prices, floor prices on collars and puts and long put prices on three way collars. Excludes production associated with the exchanged Appalachia properties. Excludes NGL production.

86%

100%

86% 76% 75%

77%

2%

12%

14%24%

25%

23%

$5.34

$5.09

$5.07 $5.04

$5.04

$5.04

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 1H 2017

MM

cfe

Swaps Puts Unhedged

Page 30: November 10, 2012

-$150

-$100

-$50

$0

$50

$100

$150

FY '07 FY '08 FY'09 FY '10

($ in

Mill

ions

)

Net Income/(Loss) Non-Cash Items Adjusted EBITDA

-$150

-$100

-$50

$0

$50

$100

$150

FY '07 FY '08 FY'09 FY '10

($ in

Mill

ions

)

Net Income/(Loss) Non-Cash Items Adjusted EBITDA

Non-Cash Items Distort IncomeNon-Cash Items Distort Income

Due to large non-cash items such as impairments and unrealized hedge gains and losses due to fluctuations in commodity prices, Vanguard often experiences large swings in Net Income/(Loss) that distort it’s “ability” to pay distributions

Adjusted EBITDA eliminates these items to arrive at “true” cash flow

*Non-Cash Items include depletion, depreciation and amortization, impairment, (gain) / loss

on acquisitions, unrealized (gain) loss on commodity and interest rate derivatives and unit-based

compensation expense.

$30.4$48.8 $56.2

$80.4

-$150

-$100

-$50

$0

$50

$100

$150

FY '07 FY '08 FY'09 FY '10

($ in

Mill

ions

)

Net Income/(Loss) Non-Cash Items Adjusted EBITDA

30

Page 31: November 10, 2012

374.2%

173.4%

90.8%

124.7%

52.5%

(11.9%)

-100%

0%

100%

200%

300%

400%

500%

J an-09 Oct-09 J ul-10 Apr-11 J an-12 Nov-12

Pric

e Pe

rfor

man

ce (

%)

VNR E&P MLP WTI AMZ S&P 500 Royalty Trusts

Price Performance Since 2009Price Performance Since 2009

Note: Market data as of 11/08/2012.(1) E&P MLP Index includes: BBEP, EVEP, LGCY, LINE, PSE, QRE, MCEP, MEMP, PSE, ARP, LRE.(2) US Royalty Trust Index includes: CRT, HGT, MTR, PBT, SBR and SJT.

(1) (2)

The results have been great. VNR has outperformed US Royalty Trusts, C-Corps and other E&P MLPs. The strategy works.

31

Page 32: November 10, 2012

Vanguard has the highest distribution growth rate since its IPO in October 2007

However, Vanguard is still trading at a higher yield than many of its peers

Vanguard’s Value PropositionVanguard’s Value Proposition

41%

28%24%

18%15% 15%

4%

8.6%

4.8%9.0%

10.8%9.9% 7.3%

8.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

VNR EVEP LGCY QRE BBEP LINE PSE

Note: Does not include recent IPOs of MCEP, LRE and MEMP. Market Data based on November 8, 2012 pricing.(1)2011 distribution coverage taken from company press releases and market research.

Typically, MLPs with a track record of

distribution growth are valued at a

premium….not currently?

Current Yields in Yellow

2011 Coverage:(1) 1.4x 1.1x 1.1x 1.2x 1.3x 1.2x 1.4x

32

Page 33: November 10, 2012

33

Key Investment HighlightsKey Investment Highlights

High quality, long-lived reserve base with low production decline rates and low

capital reinvestment requirements

Geographically diverse asset base comprised predominantly of oil properties

Active hedging program which has locked in attractive margins through 2014 for

crude oil and 1H 2017 for natural gas

Significant inventory of low-risk development opportunities

Well-capitalized balance sheet with sufficient liquidity and financial flexibility

Experienced management team with a track record of successful operations,

acquisitions, and integrations