Upload
tranphuc
View
232
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
The B-2A Spirit: Kosovo and Beyond
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
Analysis Center
Northrop Grumman Analysis Center, (703) 875-0001/0055, [email protected] Feb 2000
2
Kosovo & BeyondNORTHROP GRUMMAN
Analysis Center
• A “User’s Assessment” of the B-2 in Operation Allied Force:“. . . the B-2 was a star performer. The B-2 with Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) was our only manned aircraft that could strike targets with precision in any weather . . . Furthermore, the B-2 and JDAM demonstrated their impressive flexibility when we devised a procedure to retarget them in flight.”
— General John Jumper, 26 October 1999
• With improvements, the B-2 can become far more capablethan it was in Allied Force:
Link 16, Center Instrument Display, In-Flight Mission Re-Planning, etc.
4,700-lb EGBU-28, Smart Bomb Racks for 500-lb JDAMs, Brilliant Anti-Tank (BAT) for moving vehicles, 30,000-lb Big BLU for very deep targets, etc.
Dynamic Mission Re-Planning as well as Low Observability (LO) Signature & Maintainability Upgrades
Connectivity:Connectivity:Connectivity:
Lethality: Lethality: Lethality:
Survivability:Survivability:Survivability:
16 Feb 2000
3
• Initial combat employment of the B-2A• 49 sorties launched from Whiteman AFB, 45 dropped
• Training enabled pilots to cope with 28-32 hour missions
• Only the B-2 employed GPS-aided, inertially guided, through-weather JDAMs
• Delivered an average of 14.6 weapons/sortie, including four 4,700-lb GBU-37s• Over 80% of B-2 targets were hit on the first pass
• The B-2’s GPS-Aided Targeting System (GATS) used the radar to achieve circular-error probables (CEPs) less than 1/2th those of unaided JDAM
• GATS also allowed through-weather, precision attacks onimprecisely located targets
• I.e, target-area “cursor adjustments” for inaccurate coordinates or air defense targets which had moved within the target area
• However, B-2 in-flight replanning/retargeting was limited
The B-2 in Allied ForceNORTHROP GRUMMAN
Analysis Center
16 Feb 2000
4
GPS-Aided TargetingGPS-Aided Targeting• Adverse
Weather
• Launchand Leave
• SeekerlessPrecision
• Adverse Weather
• Launchand Leave
• SeekerlessPrecision
B-2 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)B-2 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
Global-PositioningSystem (GPS)
Satellites
Global-PositioningSystem (GPS)
Satellites
2000-lb JDAM2000-lb JDAM
17 July 1999
5
Enable GATSMode & Com-mand Imaging
Select GPS Constellation
UpdatesWeapon(s)
Select AutomaticDelivery Mode
Compute SecondUpdate Parameters
Weapons Use GPS
1
WeaponsRelease
2 3
7
GPS-AidedTargeting System (GATS)
GPS-AidedTargeting System (GATS)
4
5
6
8
Automated Functions
Crew Functions
Designate Aim Points
Execute Second Update
2 Radar Looks Eliminate Target-Location Error2 Radar Looks Eliminate Target-Location Error17 July 1999
6
A B-2 Functional Effect
JDAM ImpactJDAM Impact JDAM ImpactJDAM Impact
JDAM ImpactJDAM ImpactJDAM ImpactJDAM Impact JDAM ImpactJDAM Impact
JDAM ImpactJDAM Impact
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
Analysis Center
17 July 199916 Feb 2000
“…estimated by battle damage assessment, B-2s damaged or destroyed a higher percentage of their targets than any other aircraft participating in combat operations.”
— DOT&E Report
Post-strike Obvra Base, Serbia,following 17 April 1999 B-2 StrikePost-strike Obvra Base, Serbia,
following 17 April 1999 B-2 Strike
7
Took on the Toughest TargetsPre-StrikePre-Strike
Novi Sad Railroad & Highway Bridge Over Danube, SerbiaNovi Sad Railroad & Highway Bridge Over Danube, Serbia
Post-Strike8 JDAMs from 1 B-2
Post-Strike8 JDAMs from 1 B-2
“...the B-2 did a magnificent job.…[I]n adverse weather…it was an absolutely critical ingredient of success.”
— General Wesley Clark*
* Testimony, Senate Armed Services Committee, 1 July 1999
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
Analysis Center
17 July 1999
8
Post-StrikePost-Strike
KRIVOVO SUPPORT BASE, SERBIA KRIVOVO SUPPORT BASE, SERBIA
DoD Briefing, 22 April 1999:MajGen Wald: This is the Krivovosupport base in Serbia . . . [I]f you look closely, there are 8 different holes on 8 different buildings. That was one B-2 that did that . . .Question: Did you say one B-2 today with the smart bombs can do the damage of 1,500 B-17s in World War II? . . .MajGen Wald: I would say they [B-2s] could probably do more than the damage of 1,500 [B-17s] because of the precision and the ability to target the right thing.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
Analysis CenterMultiple Aim-Points per Pass
17 July 1999
9
In Kosovo, Gen. Jumper Wanted “Flex Targeting”
Joint STARSJoint STARS
PredatorPredatorUAVUAV
CAOCCAOC(Combined(CombinedAir Air OpnsOpnsCenter)Center)
FF--16 Shooters16 Shooters
Mobile TargetMobile Target
ComSatComSatComSat
“. . . we need equipment that will provide real-time imagery and target location directly to our fighter and bomber crews….To make airpower as effective as possible against mobile targets, we must have complete integration between all available air and space sensors at our nation’s disposal . . . . Ultimately, our goal is to reduce the time from target identification to target destruction from hours and days to minutes.”
— Gen. John Jumper26 Oct 1999
16 Feb 2000
10
First Steps for FY01 NORTHROP GRUMMAN
Analysis Center
Connectivity & SurvivabilityConnectivity & SurvivabilityConnectivity & Survivability
• Link 16 / Center Instrument Display—secure link for real-time data on threats, friendly forces, & targets
• In-Flight Re-Planning—dynamic flight-path (“blue line”) and target/aim-point re-planning; stealth = low observables (LO) + tactics
• EHF Preliminary Design and Risk Reduction Study—LO antennas for broadband “pipe” (including target imagery)
• Smart Bomb Rack Assembly with 500 lb. JDAM (EMD)—5 times as many precision weapons / sortie
• EGBU-28—replaces GBU-37 with “standard” USAF penetrator
LethalityLethalityLethality
16 Feb 2000
11
Back-up Slides
12
Future of the US Bomber Force
B-52H
B-2A
Follow-onLong-Range
StrikePlatform
020406080
100120140160180200
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Follow-on Long-Range Platform• IOC: 2037• Production: 2034• New Acquisition Program: 2019• Concept Exploration: 2016• Mission Needs Statement: 2014• Mission Area Assessment: 2013
2037Minimum inventory (170) for
130 combat-coded bombers B-1B
USAF Bomber“Roadmap”
March 1999
“We think the balance of bomber, ISR support aircraft, and fighter aircraft with our lift and tanker capability, ratio-wise, is about right. . . . with our budget we think we've got it about right at this point.”
— LtGen Marv Esmond, USAF*
* Testimony, Military Procurement Subcommittee, House Armed Services Committee, 30 June 1999
US Fixed-WingModernization
$0 B$1 B$2 B$3 B$4 B$5 B$6 B$7 B$8 B$9 B
$10 B$11 B$12 B$13 B
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
F-22
F/A-18E/F
Navy JSF
USAF JSF
Bombers
F-14, AV-8BF/A-18C/DF/A-18E/FNavy JSFUSAF JSFF-22F16, F117, A10F-15EBombers
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
Analysis Center