North Valley Military Institute - Board of Directors ...the board consider the sale of receivables to Charter School Capital. IX. ACTION – The Director of Operations requests the

North Valley Military Institute - Board of Directors Meeting Thursday, June 18, 2015 4:00 p.m. in the Parish Hall

16651A Rinaldi Street, Granada Hills, CA 91344

AGENDA

I. Call to Order II. Adoption of the Agenda III. Public Comment – Members of the public who wish to make comments on non-

agenda items are welcome to do so at this time. Speaker cards are available at the end of this agenda. Each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes

IV. ACTION – Approval of the April, 2015 minutes (see attached) V. ACTION – Approval of the Local Control Accountability Plan – since September, the

NVMI community has been updating its Local Control Accountability Plan. Extensive input from staff, parents, students, community members, and governing board members has resulted in a revision of the 2013-2014 plan. The plan being presented to the Governing Board at this meeting represents that extensive input from stakeholders. In accordance with state law, the LCAP and its annual updates must be adopted by the Governing Board by June 30 annually. The plan is posted at www.novamil.org on a link from the main page and attached to this agenda.

VI. ACTION – Retroactive approval of the Proposition 39 Agreement with the Los Angeles Unified School District – The Governing Board had previously empowered the Superintendent to negotiate with LAUSD and sign an agreement under Proposition 39 if said agreement met the minimum requirements for NVMI’s facilities needs for the 2015-2016 school year. Dr. Ryan, the NVMI Superintendent collaborated with LAUSD to arrive at an Alternative Agreement which included the necessary classrooms, office space, and shared use space that meets NVMI’s minimum needs for the 15-16 school year. As a result, Dr. Ryan signed the Alternative Agreement, and at this time requests the board retroactively approve said agreement. (Attached to this agenda)

VII. ACTION – Retroactive approval of Food Service Authority Agreement with the Los Angeles Unified School District – The board had previously discussed that NVMI planned to enter into an agreement with LAUSD to provide food service on the Sun Valley High School Campus for the 2015-2016 school year. The Superintendent has signed the Food Service Authority agreement with the LAUSD and requests retroactive board approval of that agreement. (available at the board meeting)

VIII. DISCUSSION AND ACTION – The Director of Operations and Superintendent request the board consider the sale of receivables to Charter School Capital.

IX. ACTION – The Director of Operations requests the board approve the allocation and disbursement of $1386 in Title 2 funds during the 2014-2015 school year for teacher professional development .

X. ACTION – The Director of Operations requests board approval to submit the NVMI Consolidated Application for federal categorical programs for the 2015-2016 school year.

XI. INFORMATION AND ACTION – Schoolsite Council – Though charter schools are not required by law to have a Schoolsite Council, the Superintendent formed such a council at the beginning of his tenure at NVMI which meets monthly during the school year and consists of parents, staff, and students. The Schoolsite Council (SSC) at NVMI has specific responsibility for the Local Control Accountability Plan, as well as reviewing and giving input on the school’s budget, federal and state categorical funding, English Learner plans and activities, and Special Education plans and activities. Charter schools are required to have the equivalent of District English Leader Advisory Committees (DELACs) and Community Advisory Committees for Special Education (CACs), and the NVMI SCC fulfills those statutory requirements. The Superintendent requests a board motion acknowledging that the NVMI Schoolsite Council is serving as the DELAC and CAC to fulfill statutory requirements.

XII. DISCUSSION AND ACTION – The Superintendent has waived his right to the conduct of his annual evaluation in closed session. The board will, in open session, discuss the performance of the Superintendent , provide feedback on his job performance, and establish performance goals for the 2015-2016 academic year.

XIII. DISCUSSION AND ACTION – The board opts not to go into closed session for a discussion of possible legal action. The board will discuss possible litigation between the Episcopal Church of Saint Andrew and Saint Charles and the North Valley Military Institute and the board will discuss the school’s response to communications from legal counsel for the church.

XIV. DISCUSSION AND ACTION - Dir of Operations asks that board discussion incorporation of Healthy Workplace Healthy Family Act of 2014 into NVMI's board approved HR policy: Jan. 1, 2015 California Sick Leave Compliance: California recently enacted a statewide paid sick leave mandate for California employers called the Healthy Workplace Healthy Family Act of 2014 (AB1522). An employee who, on or after July 1, 2015, works in California for 30 or more days within a year from the beginning of employment, is entitled to paid sick leave. Employees, including part-time and temporary employees, will earn at least one hour of paid leave for every 30 hours worked. Accrual begins on the first day of employment or July 1, 2015, whichever is later. An employer may limit the amount of paid sick leave an employee can use in one year to 24 hours or three days. Accrued paid sick leave may be carried over to the next year, but it may be capped at 48 hours or six days.

XV. ADJOURN

North Valley Military Institute - Board of Directors Meeting Thursday, April 23, 2015 4:00 p.m. in the Parish Hall

16651A Rinaldi Street, Granada Hills, CA 91344 And via teleconference with Board Member Cesley Frost

from 510-599-6226 held at 3877 Lusk Street, Oakland, CA

MINUTES

I. Call to Order was at 4:15 by President Lanny West; Present Lanny West, Cesley Frost (by teleconference), Emory Josephs, Kay Deitch; absent Kevin Baxter. Others present: Sharon Bradley, LAUSD Charter Schools Division, Aida Tottiasian, LAUSD Charter Schools Division, Kellie JAckson, JR Sarenana, Karla Uribe, Steve Diab, Gina Wilson, Diane French Mila Reeder, Mark Ryan

II. The agenda was adopted unanimously. III. Public Comment – Members of the public who wish to make comments on non-

agenda items are welcome to do so at this time. Speaker cards are available at the end of this agenda. Each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes – there were no public speakers.

IV. ACTION – The board unanimously approved the March, 2015 board minutes. V. INFORMATION – Members of the school’s administrative team made presentations to

the Board of Directors regarding their operational areas of responsibility. a. Academics – Dr. Mark Ryan presented data on Benchmark #3 to the board in

powerpoint format. There was some Q/A on the benchmark data, and the board engaged with the school leadership on reasons for low performance and the preparations underway for the Smarter Balanced Assessments in May. The school administration reviewed the basic format and content of the Smarter Balanced Assessments, and the efforts to align curriculum, instruction, and assessment at NVMI with those new assessments. The board also heard from Diane French regarding classroom observation data, attendance data, and schoolwide Grade Point Averages. Diane also handed out a paper with proposed contents for a schoolwide “data dashboard” which would be updated monthly and include current data on all four NVMI pillars – Academics, Leadership, Citizenship, and Athletics, as well as financial and other pertinent data for the board and public. The board proposed the addition of several data points to the proposed dashboard, which the school administration hopes to have operational in its nascent stages for the 2015-2016 school year.

b. Leadership – Captain Steve Diab presented information about the highly successful NVMI performances at the California Cadet Corps state drill competition and Individual Major Awards (Cadet of the Year) competition held last weekend at Los Alamitos Joint Forces Training Base. He also briefed the board on the schoolwide physical challenges which are successfully being implemented in their first year of existence. There are also several upcoming events in the Leadership domain, including several parades and NVMI entrance camp in addition to the California Cadet Corps summer camp. Captain Diab also

shared information about NVMI cadet participation in the Special Olympics this coming summer.

c. Citizenship – Gina Wilson presented citizenship information to the board. There were no suspensions of expulsions in the last month. The school is attempting to focus on positive reinforcement, especially through the school’s merit system. The board asked a variety of questions about the merit system, which were answered by Ms. Wilson, Captain Diab, and Dr. Ryan.

d. Athletics – JR Sarenana presented written and verbal information to the board about both the middle school and high school sports programs. We are nearing the end of all seasons, and this first year of associate membership in CIF has been successful, despite various facility challenges. JR has been scheduling games for the 2015-2016 school year, predicated on the belief that we will likely be on the Sun Valley HS campus. The school will be offering conditioning classes and clinics during the summer through the YPI ASSETS grant program. We are also ensuring that all students comply with the policies on physical examinations prior to any interscholastic sports activities, including practices and games. Several board members asked questions about the athletics program, including questions about facilities plans for Sun Valley and what we plan to do since Sun Valley was not built as a high school and does not have baseball, softball, football, swimming, etc facilities. JR and Mark responded that as we plan for the future, those considerations will affect both which sports we offer and whether we rent outside facilities to offer those sports where the SVHS facilities are not CIF compliant.

e. Special Education – Karla Uribe presented a summary of Special education enrollment and services and discussed the possibility of providing an Autism special day class or similar program for students next year at the middle school and/or high school levels.

f. Admissions and Enrollment – Dr. Ryan assured the board that NVMI is on track to retain in excess of 90% of its current 6th through 11th graders (which is dramatically higher than national military school averages), and is on track to enroll enough students to total an enrollment in excess of 530.

g. Facilities – The superintendent reminded the board that NVMI requested Dispute Resolution with the Los Angeles Unified School District as a result of the District’s final offer for Proposition 39 property at Sun Valley High School. NVMI is still waiting for a response from the district.

VI. INFORMATION, DISCUSSION, AND ACTION – The Superintendent and Director of Operations requested authorization to enter into a temporary employment agreement with Matthew Kus to serve as Project Manager for the close-out of the lease at the 16651A Rinaldi Site (including management of the portable removal, restoration of the site to its original condition, turn off of utilities, removal of technology equipment, disposal of surplus property, sale of surplus supplies and equipment, management of the various “move” functions within the context of NVMI summer school and summer camp and summer office operations, and packing necessary furnishings, fixtures, supplies ,and equipment) and move to the Sun Valley HS Campus (including establishment of utilities connections, unpacking, key management, establishment of technology connections, public address system,

telephones, furnishings, set up of technology, implementation of LAUSD as the Food Service Authority for NVMI, office set-up, Hawk Exchange and military supply set up, and interfacing with the Sun Valley and LAUSD staffs). The term of the employment agreement will be from May 1 to not longer than August 15, 2015 for a monthly fee not to exceed $7,500 (less applicable taxes, with no health benefits). The board discussed the matter briefly after an explanation by Kellie Jackson, and then unanimously approved a motion to authorize the execution of a personal service contract with the provisions outlined above.

VII. DISCUSSION AND ACTION – Financial Matters: a. The board discussed the current cash flow situation which will necessitate the sale

of receivables in the coming weeks and months in accordance with the provisions of the March board resolution. The combination of previous receivable sales, current enrollment numbers below original estimates by about 20 students, and the need to follow through on both payroll and accounts payable necessitates the sale of additional receivables to ensure timely payment of staff and creditors. The current amount in the bank is $131,082.82 with about $43,000 due to be deposited, but these amounts are not adequate to cover payroll and bills.

b. The board discussed a draft of the 2015-2016 budget and unanimously adopted a draft 2015-2016 budget predicated on an enrollment of 531 students, revenue of $5,050,452 and expenses of $5,049,741. The board discussed the fact that while this budget is balanced, it does not make up for the deficit budget from the 2014-2015 school year. The hope is to regain full financial footing after the 2016-2017 school year, considering the projections of both increased enrollment and additional LCFF dollars.

c. The board discussed the re-selection of an auditor for the 2014-2015 fiscal year. Three bids were received from qualified auditors, and Kellie Jackson recommended the selection of Vavrinek, Trine, Day and Company for a total cost of $5750, the lowest bidder. The board voted unanimously to secure the services of Vavrinek, Trine, Day and Company.

d. The board will review and initial the February and March check register. VIII. DISCUSSION AND ACTION – NVMI is in receipt of a legal notice from the Church of

Saint Andrew and Saint Charles regarding the actions demanded by the church to be taken prior to the end of our current lease on June 30, 2015. The board discussed the content of that notice and considered action to provide a formal response to the demands made in that notice. By unanimous vote, the board directed the Superintendent to send a letter to Church’s legal counsel saying that we intend to fully comply with the provisions of the lease which call for removal of the portables and restoration of the property to its original condition. Further NVMI does not intend to pay $40,000 for the sound deadening barriers in the Parish Hall because NVMI has vacated the Hall any time the church or another outside group needed the hall, and the parish has neither lost income nor use of the hall. There remains a chance that another school would take over the property, including the portable leases, and so the letter will include a deadline of May 15 for the Church or its lawyers to contact us to alert us to whether the portables must be removed. Should we not hear from the Church or its counsel by that deadline, we will proceed with the plan to remove the

portables and restore the property to its original condition pursuant to the provisions of the original lease.

IX. DISCUSSION – The presented the current NVMI Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) and NVMI progress on the LCAP measures. The Superintendent also presented information about the legal obligations of the board with regards to the LCAP. The Schoolsite Council, faculty, staff, Parent Council, and student leadership have all had multiple opportunities to give input to the draft LCAP and the LCAP has undergone various modifications as a result of that input. We anticipate approval of the final version of the LCAP at the May Governing Board meeting after May Schoolsite Council, Parent Advisory Council, school staff and faculty, and cadet leadership meetings during the month of Math.

X. EDUCATION PROTECTION ACCOUNT - The board voted unanimously to approve the following resolution.

RESOLUTION REGARDING THE EDUCATION PROTECTION ACCOUNT

WHEREAS, the voters approved Proposition 30 on November 6, 2012;

WHEREAS, Proposition 30 added Article XIII, Section 36 to the California

Constitution effective November 7, 2012;

WHEREAS, the provisions of Article XIII, Section 36(e) create in the state

General Fund an Education Protection Account to receive and disburse the revenues

derived from the incremental increases in taxes imposed by Article XIII, Section 36(f)

WHEREAS, before June 30th of each year, the Director of Finance shall estimate

the total amount of additional revenues, less refunds that will be derived from the

incremental increases in tax rates made pursuant to Article XIII, Section 36(f) that will be

available for transfer into the Education Protection Account during the next fiscal year;

WHEREAS, if the sum determined by the State Controller is positive, the State

Controller shall transfer the amount calculated into the Education Protection Account

within ten days preceding the end of the fiscal year;

WHEREAS, all monies m the Education Protection Account are hereby

continuously appropriated for the support of school districts, county offices of education,

charter schools and community college districts;

WHEREAS, monies deposited in the Education Protection Account shall not be

used to pay any costs incurred by the Legislature, the Governor or any agency of state

government;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED:

I. The monies received from the Education Protection Account shall be spent

as required by Article XIII, Section 36 and the spending determinations on how the

money will be spent shall be made in open session of a public meeting of the governing

board of North Valley Military Institute.

2. In compliance with Article X[[[, Section 36(e), with the California

Constitution, the governing board of the North Valley Military Institute has

determined to spend the monies received from the Education Protection Act as attached.

8

Expenditures through: June 30, 2015 For Fund 01, Resource 1400 Education Protection Account

Description Object Codes Object Codes Amount

AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR THIS FISCAL YEAR Adjusted Beginning Fund Balance 9791-9795 9791-9795 0.00 Revenue Limit Sources 8010-8099 8010-8099 298,483.00 TOTAL AVAILABLE 298,483.00

EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES

(Objects 1000-7999) SACS Object

SACS Function

Instruction 1100 1000-1999 298,483.00 Instruction-Related Services

Instructional Library, Media, and Technology 1200, 2200, 2900

2420 0.00

Other Instructional Resources (Including Parent Participation) 2900 2490-2495 0.00 Pupil Services

Guidance and Counseling Services 1200 3110 0.00 Psychological Services 1200 3120 0.00 Attendance and Social Work Services 2900 3130 0.00 Health Services 1200, 2200 3140 0.00 Speech Pathology and Audiology Services 1100 3150 0.00

Pupil Testing Services 1100, 1900, 2100 3160 0.00

Pupil Transportation 2200 3600 0.00 Food Services 2200, 2900 3700 0.00 Other Pupil Services 3900 0.00

Ancillary Services 4000-4999 0.00 Community Services 5000-5999 0.00 Plant Services 2200 8000-8999 0.00 Other Outgo 9000-9999 0.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 298,483.00

BALANCE (Total Available minus Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses) 0.00 Note: EPA estimate from CDE 14-15 1st qtr. Apportionment

9

XI. Adjournment was a 6:28 p.m.

Page 10 of 101

§ 15497. Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template.

Introduction:

LEA: North Valley Military Institute

Contact (Name, Title, Email, Phone Number): Dr. Mark Ryan, Superintendent, [email protected]

LCAP Year:14 ADOPTED BY THE NVMI GOVERNING BOARD AT THE JUNE 18, 2015 BOARD MEETING

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

The Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) and annual update template shall be used to provide details regarding local educational agencies’ (LEAs) actions and expenditures to support pupil outcomes and overall performance pursuant to Education Code sections 52060, 52066, 47605, 47605.5, and 47606.5.

For school districts, pursuant to Education Code section 52060, the LCAP must describe, for the school district and each school within the district, goals and specific actions to achieve those goals for all pupils and each subgroup of pupils identified in Education Code section 52052, including pupils with disabilities, for each of the state priorities and any locally identified priorities.

For county offices of education, pursuant to Education Code section 52066, the LCAP must describe, for each county office of education-operated school and program, goals and specific actions to achieve those goals for all pupils and each subgroup of pupils identified in Education Code section 52052, including pupils with disabilities, who are funded through the county office of education Local Control Funding Formula as identified in Education Code section 2574 (pupils attending juvenile court schools, on probation or parole, or mandatorily expelled) for each of the state priorities and any locally identified priorities. School districts and county offices of education may additionally coordinate and describe in their LCAPs services provided to pupils funded by a school district but attending county-operated schools and programs, including special education programs.

Charter schools, pursuant to Education Code sections 47605, 47605.5, and 47606.5, must describe goals and specific actions to achieve those goals for all pupils and each subgroup of pupils identified in Education Code section 52052, including pupils with disabilities, for each of the state priorities as applicable and any locally identified priorities. For charter schools, the inclusion and description of goals for state priorities in the LCAP may be modified to meet the grade levels served and the nature of the programs provided, including modifications to reflect only the statutory requirements explicitly applicable to charter schools in the Education Code.

Page 11 of 101

The LCAP is intended to be a comprehensive planning tool. LEAs may reference and describe actions and expenditures in other plans and funded by a variety of other fund sources when detailing goals, actions, and expenditures related to the state and local priorities. LCAPs must be consistent with school plans submitted pursuant to Education Code section 64001. The information contained in the LCAP, or annual update, may be supplemented by information contained in other plans (including the LEA plan pursuant to Section 1112 of Subpart 1 of Part A of Title I of Public Law 107-110) that are incorporated or referenced as relevant in this document.

For each section of the template, LEAs should comply with instructions and use the guiding questions as prompts (but not limits) for completing the information as required by statute. Guiding questions do not require separate narrative responses. Data referenced in the LCAP must be consistent with the school accountability report card where appropriate. LEAs may resize pages or attach additional pages as necessary to facilitate completion of the LCAP.

State Priorities

The state priorities listed in Education Code sections 52060 and 52066 can be categorized as specified below for planning purposes, however, school districts and county offices of education must address each of the state priorities in their LCAP. Charter schools must address the priorities in Education Code section 52060(d) that apply to the grade levels served, or the nature of the program operated, by the charter school.

A. Conditions of Learning:

Basic: degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned pursuant to Education Code section 44258.9, and fully credentialed in the subject areas and for the pupils they are teaching; pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials pursuant to Education Code section 60119; and school facilities are maintained in good repair pursuant to Education Code section 17002(d). (Priority 1)

Implementation of State Standards: implementation of academic content and performance standards adopted by the state board for all pupils, including English learners. (Priority 2)

Course access: pupil enrollment in a broad course of study that includes all of the subject areas described in Education Code section 51210 and subdivisions (a) to (i), inclusive, of Section 51220, as applicable. (Priority 7)

Page 12 of 101

Expelled pupils (for county offices of education only): coordination of instruction of expelled pupils pursuant to Education Code section 48926. (Priority 9)

Foster youth (for county offices of education only): coordination of services, including working with the county child welfare agency to share information, responding to the needs of the juvenile court system, and ensuring transfer of health and education records. (Priority 10)

B. Pupil Outcomes:

Pupil achievement: performance on standardized tests, score on Academic Performance Index, share of pupils that are college and career ready, share of English learners that become English proficient, English learner reclassification rate, share of pupils that pass Advanced Placement exams with 3 or higher, share of pupils determined prepared for college by the Early Assessment Program. (Priority 4)

Other pupil outcomes: pupil outcomes in the subject areas described in Education Code section 51210 and subdivisions (a) to (i), inclusive, of Education Code section 51220, as applicable. (Priority 8)

C. Engagement:

Parent involvement: efforts to seek parent input in decision making, promotion of parent participation in programs for unduplicated pupils and special need subgroups. (Priority 3)

Pupil engagement: school attendance rates, chronic absenteeism rates, middle school dropout rates, high school dropout rates, high school graduations rates. (Priority 5)

School climate: pupil suspension rates, pupil expulsion rates, other local measures including surveys of pupils, parents and teachers on the sense of safety and school connectedness. (Priority 6)

LOCAL PRIORITIES:

In addition to the above, NVMI has added a priority of ensuring that the school’s four pillars of academics, leadership, citizenship, and athletics are robust and meeting the needs of all students, (NVMI Priority 8) as well as a priority to ensure the school is fiscally sound and well governed. (NVMI Priority 9)

Page 13 of 101

Section 1: Stakeholder Engagement

Meaningful engagement of parents, pupils, and other stakeholders, including those representing the subgroups identified in Education Code section 52052, is critical to the LCAP and budget process. Education Code sections 52062 and 52063 specify the minimum requirements for school districts; Education Code sections 52068 and 52069 specify the minimum requirements for county offices of education, and Education Code section 47606.5 specifies the minimum requirements for charter schools. In addition, Education Code section 48985 specifies the requirements for translation of documents.

Instructions: Describe the process used to engage parents, pupils, and the community and how this engagement contributed to development of the LCAP or annual update. Note that the LEA’s goals related to the state priority of parental involvement are to be described separately in Section 2, and the related actions and expenditures are to be described in Section 3.

Guiding Questions:

1) How have parents, community members, pupils, local bargaining units, and other stakeholders (e.g., LEA personnel, county child welfare agencies, county office of education foster youth services programs, court-appointed special advocates, foster youth, foster parents, education rights holders and other foster youth stakeholders, English learner parents, community organizations representing English learners, and others as appropriate) been engaged and involved in developing, reviewing, and supporting implementation of the LCAP?

2) How have stakeholders been included in the LEA’s process in a timely manner to allow for engagement in the development of the LCAP? 3) What information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative data/metrics) was made available to stakeholders related to the state priorities and

used by the LEA to inform the LCAP goal setting process? 4) What changes, if any, were made in the LCAP prior to adoption as a result of written comments or other feedback received by the LEA

through any of the LEA’s engagement processes? 5) What specific actions were taken to meet statutory requirements for stakeholder engagement pursuant to Education Code sections

52062, 52068, and 47606.5, including engagement with representative parents of pupils identified in Education Code section 42238.01? 6) In the annual update, how has the involvement of these stakeholders supported improved outcomes for pupils related to the state

priorities?

Page 14 of 101

Involvement Process Impact on LCAP

2013-2014

STEP 1: The state’s priorities were reviewed by faculty and administration in several admin and faculty meetings and draft NVMI priorities were created, along with draft action steps to address the priorities along with prioritized budget plans to bring those action steps to reality. Data, including student achievement data, college going and college performance data, discipline and attendance data, and other data requested by stakeholders was reviewed extensively.

STEP 2: A draft LCAP was presented to the Governing Board for input and discussed in an open meeting.

STEP 3: The draft LCAP was presented at a community fair at which the entire school community of parents and students was present. The LCAP contents were made into large posters and students and parents were asked to provide comments and input on those large sheets. It was also made available on the NVMI website and at the school office. It was also sent in the weekly

This became the initial document that was shared with parents and students and further discussed by the staff.

The LCAP was further refined with board member input, including refinement of the priorities and action steps, along with budget considerations.

The LCAP was significantly revised to include the input from parents and students.

Page 15 of 101


parent bulletin.

STEP 4: A final version of the LCAP, incorporating all input from stakeholders was presented to the NVMI governing board and discussed in a public meeting.

The board made minor adjustments to the plan, discussed the budget implications extensively, and approved the LCAP along with the preliminary budget for the 2014-2015 school year.

2014-2015

The Schoolsite Council met and discussed the LCAP extensively at both its March, 2015 and April, 2015 meetings.

The “annual update” section was completed collaboratively, extensive discussions took place regarding the metrics and NVMI performance on those metrics. The “what will be different” sections were updated collaboratively as well. . Identified needs and metrics were adjusted based on SSC input.

The faculty at is March meeting discussed the LCAP extensively and the Curriculum Committee met in April to discuss LCAP.

Changes were made to the “annual update section, identified needs, and metrics sections based on faculty input.

Cadet battalion staff discussed LCAP at March and April meetings. Some changes were made to the annual update section and slight changes to the metrics section.

Page 16 of 101


The Governing Board went through the LCAP draft at both the March and April, 2015 board meetings after the SSC did its work. The Board asked questions about the various sections and gave input on both the goals and metrics to be used.

The Annual update section and “what will be different” sections were modified based no board input. Identified needs and metrics were adjusted based on board input.

At the May, 2015 SSC meeting, a final discussion took place regarding the LCAP and all members had a final opportunity to suggest any changes.

Slight modifications were made based on SSC input.

At the June, 2015 Board meeting, the board voted on the final version of the LCAP as drafted and modified by the SSC (and board) at the previous monthly meetings.

Final approval of LCAP for 2015-2016.

Page 17 of 101

Section 2: Goals and Progress Indicators

For school districts, Education Code sections 52060 and 52061, for county offices of education, Education Code sections 52066 and 52067, and for charter schools, Education Code section 47606.5 require(s) the LCAP to include a description of the annual goals, for all pupils and each subgroup of pupils, for each state priority and any local priorities and require the annual update to include a review of progress towards the goals and describe any changes to the goals.

Instructions: Describe annual goals and expected and actual progress toward meeting goals. This section must include specifics projected for the applicable term of the LCAP, and in each annual update year, a review of progress made in the past fiscal year based on an identified metric. Charter schools may adjust the chart below to align with the term of the charter school’s budget that is submitted to the school’s authorizer pursuant to Education Code section 47604.33. The metrics may be quantitative or qualitative, although LEAs must, at minimum, use the specific metrics that statute explicitly references as required elements for measuring progress within a particular state priority area. Goals must address each of the state priorities and any additional local priorities; however, one goal may address multiple priorities. The LEA may identify which school sites and subgroups have the same goals, and group and describe those goals together. The LEA may also indicate those goals that are not applicable to a specific subgroup or school site. The goals must reflect outcomes for all pupils and include specific goals for school sites and specific subgroups, including pupils with disabilities, both at the LEA level and, where applicable, at the school site level. To facilitate alignment between the LCAP and school plans, the LCAP shall identify and incorporate school-specific goals related to the state and local priorities from the school plans submitted pursuant to Education Code section 64001. Furthermore, the LCAP should be shared with, and input requested from, school site-level advisory groups (e.g., school site councils, English Learner Advisory Councils, pupil advisory groups, etc.) to facilitate alignment between school-site and district-level goals and actions. An LEA may incorporate or reference actions described in other plans that are being undertaken to meet the goal.

Guiding Questions:

1) What are the LEA’s goal(s) to address state priorities related to “Conditions of Learning”? 2) What are the LEA’s goal(s) to address state priorities related to “Pupil Outcomes”? 3) What are the LEA’s goal(s) to address state priorities related to “Engagement” (e.g., pupil and parent)? 4) What are the LEA’s goal(s) to address locally-identified priorities? 5) How have the unique needs of individual school sites been evaluated to inform the development of meaningful district and/or individual

school site goals (e.g., input from site level advisory groups, staff, parents, community, pupils; review of school level plans; in-depth school level data analysis, etc.)?

Page 18 of 101

6) What are the unique goals for subgroups as defined in Education Code sections 42238.01 and 52052 that are different from the LEA’s goals for all pupils?

7) What are the specific predicted outcomes/metrics/noticeable changes associated with each of the goals annually and over the term of the LCAP?

8) What information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative data/metrics) was considered/reviewed to develop goals to address each state or local priority and/or to review progress toward goals in the annual update?

9) What information was considered/reviewed for individual school sites? 10) What information was considered/reviewed for subgroups identified in Education Code section 52052? 11) In the annual update, what changes/progress have been realized and how do these compare to changes/progress predicted? What

modifications are being made to the LCAP as a result of this comparison?

Page 19 of 101

Identified Need and Metric

(What needs have been identified and

what metrics are used to measure

progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:

Analysis of Progress

What will be different/improved for students? (based on identified metric)

Related State and Local Priorities

(Identify specific state priority. For districts and COEs,

all priorities in statute must be

included and identified; each

goal may be linked to more than one

priority if appropriate.)

Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify

applicable subgroups (as defined in EC

52052) or indicate “all” for all pupils.)

School(s) Affected

(Indicate “all” if the goal

applies to all schools in the

LEA, or alternatively,

all high schools, for example.)

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: All teachers will have full credentials

METRIC: Same

All teachers have clear credentials

Affects all students

NVMI 14-15: 1 intern teacher, 6 have preliminary credentials; 13 clears Those on prelim are either in BTSA or have a plan to complete BTSA.

Any teachers who do not have clear credentials will have a signed plan to indicate how they will get them

Teachers will fully implement their plan; including participation in LAUSD BTSA; consider mentor program for teachers, especially new teachers to NVMI

All teachers will be fully credentialed with clear credentials or in the final stages of getting clear credentials

State priority 1

Page 20 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: No teachers assigned to teach a course for which they do not possess proper credential

METRIC: Same

100% of courses will be taught by teachers will proper credentials

Affects all students in all subgroups

NVMI 14-15: There are currently two teachers with short term staff permits, neither of which will require one next year

Any courses for which a teacher is not highly qualified will trigger a plan to ensure teacher works toward full credential

Ideally, what course(s) who do not have fully credentialed teachers will have a teacher in progress toward full credential

All courses will have a fully credentialed teacher

State Priority 1

Page 21 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: All students need CCSS aligned curricular materials

METRIC: Same

100% of A-G courses have CCSS aligned textbooks and instructional materials


NVMI 14-15: CPM Math books purchased; newsela.com purchased for informational text work

Math books purchased (hard copy and online-College Prep Math); newsela.com purchased but not used to full capacity because of technology troubles

Research NGSS materials and ELA/ and History/SS materials; research Study Island possibilities

Purchase NGSS and ELA materials; make decision for 17-18 about History/Social Science

State Priority 1

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

Page 22 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: School facility maintained in excellent condition; repairs ASAP

METRIC: Same

School facility maintained in excellent condition; repairs ASAP


NVMI Compliant with metric; moving to Sun Valley HS on Prop 39 offer for 15-16; in ongoing negotiations with LAUSD re: total number of available classrooms

No marginally unsafe conditions allowed to persist > 1 working day



State Priority 1

State Priority 6

Page 23 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Special Ed credentials needed for gen ed teachers so they are dually credentialed

METRIC: # of dually credentialed teachers

At least 50% of NVMI teachers are dually credentialed in Multiple Subjects/Single Subjects AND mild/moderate RSP WITH AUT certificate

Special Education students

NVMI Programs options investigated; no program implemented due to lack of budget funds and staff overload

Program options investigated; LMU program likely to be implemented next year (need to include AUT Certificate)

Program hopefully begins in fall 2015

Ideally 50% of gen ed staff are SPED credentialed by the end of the 16-17 school year

State Priority 1

State Priority 4

Page 24 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Curriculum maps needed for all courses aligned with CCSS

METRIC: # of courses mapped

CCSS Aligned curriculum maps created for all NVMI courses

All students in all subgroups

NVMI Maps for all courses developed in Jul, 2014; modified January 2015 and aligned to benchmarks

All levels ELA, all levels math through Pre-Cal, 5 science courses, 2 years of Spanish, and 6 History/Social Science courses have been successfully mapped with significant faculty input

Remainder of and all new courses are mapped

Any new courses mapped

State Priority State Priority 4

Page 25 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: PD For teachers on CCSS implementation

METRIC: Hours of PD and evaluations of those professional development events

Professional Development in Common Core Standards for all teachers specific to their disciplines (differentiated by teacher)


NVMI All math teachers provided 40 hours of CPM training; CPM Teachers report high level of satisfaction with PD; gather data on differentiated PD needs of all teachers and all new hires; Professional Development offered on Reading Apprenticeship

Minimum of 40 hours provided to all math teachers; follow up needed on Study Team Strategies and how to align with SBAC interim assessments; Reading Apprenticeship and English Learner Schoolwide Strategies PD (Sentence

Minimum of 60 hours provided to all teachers, including teacher self-identified PD of at least 40 hours; differentiated PD planning; Study Team Strategies; Skill and Will; AVID training; EL and Reading Apprenticeship Strategies; Writing Across

Minimum of 60 hours provided to all teachers, including teacher self-identified PD of at least 40 hours; differentiated PD planning

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

Page 26 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

and EL Schoolwide Strategies; more follow up needed

frame, THIEVES, word walls, academic vocab, etc)

the Curriculum

NEED: Implementation of technology based intervention and assessment tools

METRIC: Student achievement data

Students receive technology based pre-assessments, interventions, and post-assessments of performance in math and ELA/ELD


NVMI None; technology problems prevented this from happening; need to investigate options like NWEA Map (Study Island)

Sixth graders will be pre-assessed, receive computer based interventions, and post-assessed in Math and ELA

Sixth and seventh graders will be pre-assessed, receive computer based interventions, and post-assessed in Math and ELA

Sixth, seventh, and eighth graders will be pre-assessed, receive computer based interventions, and post-assessed in all core subjects

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

State Priority 6

Page 27 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: computer based resources to help identify student academic need

METRIC: Student achievement increased based on computer data

NVMI will implement computer based assessments of student achievement levels aligned with SBAC Assessments


NVMI Implemented STAR Renaissance and AR testing partially across English classes; due to tech problems; no others implemented; no SBAC interims available when needed

Implement iready; Pearson Essay Grader; STAR Renaissance assessment system for ELA/Math

Implement Accelerated Reader

Continue implementation and adjust as necessary

Continue implementation and adjust as necessary

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

Page 28 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Technology based observation tool

METRIC: implemented and data used to evaluate program and teacher effectiveness

NVMI will implement a technology based tool for classroom walk throughs and observations by admin/peers


NVMI Google survey implemented and data from that survey are being collected and analyzed; data shared with faculty at faculty meetings; curriculum committee discussed data from observations; data shared with board at board meetings; data used in teacher

Google survey as observation data collection instrument; perform preliminary data analysis

Decide whether the piloted app is appropriate to move forward or if another is preferable

Implement fully and use data for analysis

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

Page 29 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

evaluation process for self-eval and eval by Superintendent

NEED: English Learner strategies implemented schoolwide

METRIC: Classroom observation data shows strategies fully implementing in

Specific EL strategies will be implemented in all NVMI classrooms across all academic disciplines

English Learners primarily, but will also benefit all students

NVMI Pull out class for beginning EL students periods 1/2 with Mr. Adorable; Word walls in about 85% of classrooms, graphic organizers and visuals in about 25%, objectives and agendas in

Implementation of five strategies: 1) word walls, 2) graphic organizers and visuals, 3) THIEVES, 4) sentence frames, and 5) objectives/ agendas on board using

Implementation of five strategies from previous year PLUS at least two additional strategies

Implementation of seven strategies from previous two years plus three additional strategies to bring the total to ten

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

Page 30 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

all classrooms about 60% of rooms; sentence frames and THIEVES being implemented sporadically; conducted PD in August, need follow up PD for all teachers, including military staff

common whiteboard protocol

NEED: Greater parental involvement

100% of new parents participate in new parent orientation


NVMI 77% of parents participated in orientation

75% of parents schoolwide have participated in orientation

85% of new parents schoolwide have participated in

95% of new parents schoolwide have participated in

State Priority 3

State Priority 6

Page 31 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

METRIC: Numbers of parents at PAC meetings, SSC meetings, parent orientation, back to school night, student led conferences, and parent volunteer opportunities

100% of platoons are represented at PAC meetings

100% of parents attend Back to School Night and Student Led Conferences

100% of parents

About half of platoons represented at most PAC meetings

Attendance at Student Led Conference 1: 82%, SLC 2: 77%, SLC 3: 56%; Back to School Night: 84%.

SSC has about 20

75% of platoons represented at PAC meetings

75% of parents complete parent hours and participate in student led conferences and Back to School Night

orientation



orientation



Page 32 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

complete service hours

parents at each meeting

Parent leaders want more strictness on this

Need plans to improve parent attendance

NEED: Quarterly interim assessments in all classes

METRIC: Analysis of data from interim

70%> students in all subgroups proficient in all subjects and show statistically significant growth on internal interim


NVMI

Benchmarks 1-3 administered; data analyzed and became baseline data (available separately); no SBAC interim assessments available; need

Baseline data collected during this school year.

Ideally, statistically significant growth between blueprints A and

Minimum of 5% growth in proficiency levels of all students in all subgroups when compared to baseline of 2014-2015;

Minimum of 10% growth in proficiency levels of all students in all subgroups when compared to baseline of 2014-2015;

State Priority 4

Page 33 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

assessments assessments

this to gauge student proficiency; teacher and school level analysis of data; presentations to the board; discussions in Curriculum Committee, Fac meetings, dept, grade level meetings about results.

B and B and C; A and C; presentations to the board; discussions in Curriculum Committee, Faculty meetings, and department and grade level meetings about results.

presentations to the board; discussions in Curriculum Committee, Faculty meetings, and department and grade level meetings about results.

presentations to the board; discussions in Curriculum Committee, Faculty meetings, and department and grade level meetings about results.

Page 34 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Intensive Academic Support

METRIC: Number of students receiving support and their academic performance relative to the goals

All students requiring academic support will receive the necessary support to ensure proficiency in all subjects


NVMI Q1: Students with Fs at Progress Report 1A were assigned AS for Q2

Q2: Students with Fs from Q1 were assigned

Q3/4: Students with Fs from Sem 1 in zero period and Saturday Academy;

Attendance rates

100% of students requiring academic support receive it.

This year is baseline data to identify performance levels.

Parent education


Improvement of at least 5% over baseline performance levels in all subjects will be seen.


Improvement of at least 10% over baseline performance levels in all subjects will be seen.

State Priority 4

State Priority 6

Page 35 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

overall about 65%; Anecdotal evidence is that when students attend, they pass classes; the 35%

who do not attend, continue to fail

regarding the importance of attending and taking AS seriously

70% pass CAHSEE on 1st attempt

Need further and more effective parent education on importance of Academic Support

NEED: CAHSEE Passage

At least 80% of students pass both parts of CAHSEE on first

All students NVMI 78% Pass for 10th gr in ELA; 73% Pass for 10th gr in Math;

70% pass both parts on first attempt; 100% pass prior to



State Priority 4

Page 36 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

METRIC: At least 80% of students pass both parts of CAHSEE on first attempt; 100% before graduation

attempt; 100% before graduation

100% of c/o ‘15 passed both ELA and Math; Need CAHSEE boot camp

graduation graduation; Likely CAHSEE will not be administered per SBE?

graduation

NEED: Interim assessment and data warehousing system

METRIC: Use of an interim assessment system/data warehouse;

An interim assessment system and data warehouse will be purchased and implemented fully.

All students in all subgroups; the system will be able to help disaggregate the data.

NVMI OARS purchased and is currently being used for this

Need additional training AND to decide how to align this with the SBAC interim

See interim assessment data results noted above

70%> teachers report system is helpful in promoting student





State Priority 4

Page 37 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

extent to which teachers feel the system promotes student proficiency

assessment systems; need training on use of SBAC assessments

proficiency proficiency proficiency

NEED: College Courses on the NVMI campus

METRIC: Number of students successfully completing college courses on the NVMI campus

50%> Of seniors have taken and passed an AP exam or community college course

25% Of seniors have taken and passed two AP


NVMI Not met 10%> Of seniors have taken and passed an AP exam or community college course



5% Of seniors have taken and passed two AP exams or

State Priority 4

State Priority 6

Page 38 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

exams and/or community college courses

community college courses

NEED: SAT/ACT Prep Courses

METRIC: SAT and ACT scores and college acceptances to 2/4 year colleges

85%> students meet UC A-G requirements

85% of senior class accepted to 2/4 year colleges


NVMI 50% met UC A-G requirements

50% accepted to 2/4 year colleges

College counselor held SAT prep sessions



MEAN SAT:___



MEAN SAT:___



MEAN SAT:___

State Priority 4

State Priority 6

Page 39 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Full time academic counselor

METRIC: Presence of a full time academic counselor

Connected to goals as noted above for Priority 4


NVMI Ms. Tejada hired Connected to goals as noted above for Priority 4



State Priority 4

State Priority 6

NEED: Academic Support for SPED students

METRIC: Number of SPED students achieving

100% of SPED students needing academic support will receive it

SPED students

NVMI SPED Academic support is being offered separated from 3:35-4:30 daily in room 4; SPED push in services are being

25% of SPED students will achieve proficiency as noted on interim assessments across all



State Priority 4

State Priority 6

Page 40 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

proficiency and receiving academic support

Proficiency levels of SPED students will be equivalent to that of the schoolwide population

provided in all English at all grade levels and Math and most science and social studies in high school classrooms

subjects subjects subjects

NEED: College and Alumni outreach plan for the school

METRIC: Success

95% of students participate in EAP

50%> students


NOTE: Eventually

NVMI College counselor is working to establish the culture; outreach to universities;


10%> students ready and 25%





State Priority 4

Page 41 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

of college going and graduation.

ready and 75% “ready of conditionally ready” for college English and math as noted in EAP

the LCAP will include:

75% have completed a Bachelors degree w/in 6 years of grad

individual counseling with all seniors and their families to help with FAFSA, etc.

“ready of conditionally ready” for college English and math as noted in EAP



NEED: School library

METRIC: # of Lexile leveled books available in a searchable

A school library that meets California Department of Ed minimum recommended standards ; a minimum of


NVMI Library with about 2000 titles started in room 4

A minimum of 2000 books will be available for SSR activities; plus at least 250 non-fiction titles

A minimum of 3000 books will be available for SSR activities; plus at least 500 non-fiction titles; move to Sun Valley will

A minimum of 4000 books will be available for SSR activities; plus at least 750 non-fiction titles

State Priority 4

Page 42 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

online system with check in/out system

4000 books allow us to merge libraries

NEED: Accelerated Reader and STAR Renaissance Programs fully implemented

METRIC: AR points and average Lexile level growth during school years

100% of students will participate to minimum English-department established standard for AR program and all students will be reading at grade level

All student in all subgroups

NVMI AR and STAR Renaissance initially implemented

AR points advertised once in bulletin; not fully implemented due to tech issues

70% of students will participate to minimum English-department established standard for AR program and 50%> of students will be reading at grade level

80% of students will participate to minimum English-department established standard for AR program and 60% > of students will be reading at grade level

90% of students will participate to minimum English-department established standard for AR program and 70%> of students will be reading at grade level

State Priority 4

Page 43 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: School Technology Plan update

METRIC: Successful involvement of all stakeholders in refining an approved technology plan

NVMI will have an approved Technology plan that meets both State of California and e-rate requirements


NVMI Plan has been approved; needs more input from stakeholders for revision

NVMI will have an approved Technology plan that meets both State of California and e-rate requirements; plan redrafted based on stakeholder input

NVMI will have an approved Technology plan that meets both State of California and e-rate requirements; plan redrafted and submitted to state/feds for approval

NVMI will have an approved Technology plan that meets both State of California and e-rate requirements; plan implementation ongoing

State Priority 4

NEED: Excellent school attendance, low chronic absenteeism, no

95% of greater ADA

Less than 5 % of


NVMI Attendance Rate is 93.8%;

SART meetings taking place as

92% or greater ADA

Less than 15 %

93% or greater ADA

Less than 10 %

94% or greater ADA

Less than 5 % of

State Priority 5

Page 44 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

dropouts, and 100% graduation

METRIC: Identified in the need stated above

students with 3> unexcused absences in a semester

Zero dropouts

100% graduation rate

needed; Contact with LA DA Truancy unit for parents of students with excessive whole say absences; faculty want more proactive strategies

of students with 3> unexcused absences in a semester

Zero dropouts

80% graduation rate

of students with 3> unexcused absences in a semester

Zero dropouts

90% graduation rate

students with 3> unexcused absences in a semester

Zero dropouts


NEED: Attendance incentives

ADA of 95% or greater


NVMI Every three week, merits awarded, announced in Hawk Weekly

92% ADA 93% ADA; need plan to further reinforce attendance importance;

94% ADA State priority 5

Page 45 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

METRIC: Attendance rates

and at formation for ringing of company bells; quarterly assemblies held

categories of absences; responses to #s of absences

NEED: Effective SART/SARB protocols

ADA of 95% or greater


NVMI SARTs implemented with individual meetings with Dr. Ryan and parents/students

92% ADA 93% ADA 94% ADA State priority 5

NEED: Dropout prevention and recovery efforts along with graduation

Zero dropouts and 100% graduation rate


NVMI Academic and personal counselors working individually with

Zero dropouts

80% graduation

Zero dropouts

90% graduation

Zero dropouts

95% graduation

State Priority 5

Page 46 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

persistence efforts

METRIC: Dropout and graduation rates

students and families where a student is at risk of dropping out; currently only 1 senior in danger

rate rate rate

NEED: Full time personal counselor

METRIC: Presence of personal counselor

100% of students requiring support from a counselor receive that support


NVMI Ms. DeAvila hired

70% of students requiring support from a personal counselor receive that support

75% of students requiring support from a personal counselor receive that; Interns?

80% of students requiring support from a personal counselor receive that; Interns?

State Priority 5

State Priority 6

Page 47 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Personal Learning Plans for all students including parental involvement in the development and adoption of the plans

100% of students will have a PLP that their parents have signed off on


NVMI Ms. Tejada completing PLPs for all high school students in Spring, 2015; need status report

100% of students will have a PLP that their parents have signed off on; students deficient in credits will develop plans to remediate



State Priority 5

NEED: Academic Warning Alert system

METRIC: Number of students failing

Less than 5% of students will fail courses each semester and graduation rates will be 100%


NVMI Current fail rates for classes:

Course Fail Rate

Eng 6 22%

Eng 7 13%


Less than 10% of students will fail courses each semester and graduation rates will be 85%; need


State Priority 5

State Priority 6

Page 48 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

courses and not on track to graduate

Eng 8 41%

Eng 9 51%

Eng 10 29%

Eng 11 10%

Eng 12 11%

Math 6 25%

Math 7 54%

Math 8 49%

ALG1 55%

GEOM 40%

ALG2 25%

PRECAL 0%

Sci 6 17%

specific plan to address remedies for high failure rates

Page 49 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

Sci 7 29%

Sci 8 29%

BIO 33%

PHYS 3%

Hist 6 19%

Hist 7 22%

Hist 8 40%

GEOG 27%

US HIST 12%

GOV 0%

SPAN 1 37%

SPAN2 34%

JrSrSEM 4%

Page 50 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

THEATER 0%

LOC 6 14%

LOC 7 26%

LOC 8 18%

LOC 9 28%

LOC 10 4%

LOC 11 5%

LOC 12 0%

ADV LOC 6%

PT 6 6%

PT 7 6%

PT 8 15%

PT 9 15%

Page 51 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

PT 10 17%

PT 11 10%

PT 12 0%

NEED: All students identify an adult with whom they have a positive rapport

METRIC: Student ID of those adults

100% of students will have an adult with whom they have a positive rapport and can seek support


NVMI Implemented informally but needs to be formally “checked” in the 15-16 school year




State Priority 5

NEED: Vibrant Hawk Exchange

100% of students will report satisfaction


NVMI Hawk Exchange is operational, but there are significant

60% of students will report satisfaction with the Hawk



State Priority 5

Page 52 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

METRIC: Number of merits exchanged at the HX for supplies or services

with the Hawk Exchange and its inherent structure

challenges due to lack of space and staffing and minimal budget

Exchange and its inherent reward structure



NEED: Engaging after school enrichment program and outdoor education program

100% of students will have the opportunity to participate in after school and outdoor education


NVMI ASSETs program instituted; attendance rates well below 20,000 target (need actual end of year data from YPI)

30% of students will have the opportunity to participate in after school and outdoor education opportunities



State Priority 5

Page 53 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: College going culture

METRIC: College going and completion rates; student/ parent satisfaction rates

Same as noted above re: college going and completion


NVMI College exploration during Advisory; some colleges on campus; College visits; Class team names




State Priority 5

State Priority 8

NEED: Mentoring program for at risk students

METRIC: Parent and student satisfaction levels;

100% of students who need a mentoring program are able to participate


NVMI Counseling department provides individual supports; no formal mentoring program


20% of students who need a mentoring program are able to participate; consider peer mentoring


State Priority 5

State Priority 8

Page 54 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

student retention rates

implemented program

NEED: Enhanced entrance camp strategies to help students learn school culture

METRIC: Camp pass rates, student satisfaction rates, and student retention rates

80% or more of students who start NVMI as 6th graders will culminate in 8th grade

65% or more of students who start NVMI as 6th graders will culminate 12th grade at NVMI


NVMI Entrance Camp was successful, data is still needed about efficacy of the efforts; more formal system to evaluate camp effectiveness needs to be developed; retention rates appear to be about 80% total; need analysis







State Priority 6

Page 55 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

90% or more of students who start NVMI as 9th graders will graduate from 12th grade here




NEED: Alternatives to suspension and expulsion

METRIC: Suspension and

Suspension and expulsion rates will be lower than LAUSD


NVMI No expulsions yet during 14/15 SY; suspension rate is higher, but due to specific incidents; variety of alternatives

Exploration of alternatives; implementation of proposed strategies



State Priority 6

Page 56 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

expulsion rates being used

NEED: Master Facilities Plan

METRIC: Permanent School Site

Permanent School site to accommodate long term enrollment projections


NVMI Prop 39 alternative agreement signed in June for Sun Valley HS site

Temporary facilities

Sun Valley HS? Movement to permanent facilities?

State Priority 6

NVMI Priority 9

NEED: Revamped school emergency plan

Robust school emergency plan with necessary supports to implement


NVMI School emergency plan revamped; monthly drills conducted; large scale earthquake drill conducted very

Participation in hazard ID and mitigation, all hazards planning, and preliminary participation in drills and

Continued implementation and practice of the draft plan; send additional cadets and adults to CERT

Full implementation of the draft plan; ; send additional cadets and adults to CERT

State Priority 6

Page 57 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

successfully; Students and staff CERT trained and participated in the drill; additional revamp necessary based on feedback from drill

tabletops; Extensive earthquake drill conducted with tests of all major components of the plan, including student request/release, first aid, morgue, operations, supply and logistics

training training

Page 58 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Expanded course offerings (precalculus, calculus, chemistry, physics, advanced lab science, 3/4/5 Spanish, AP courses, band program, art, expanded PE program

METRIC: # of available courses that are A-G compliant; parent

All students are exposed to a robust academic program in all domains


NVMI Precalculus and physics offered; Calculus, Spanish 4AP, Chemistry and grades 6-10 Honors in the plan for 15-16 school year; All courses are A-G compliant and were approved in summer 2014 by UC/CSU Pathways program; plans in place to get remaining courses for 15-

Offer precalculus and physics

Offer calculus and chemistry in addition to previous courses

Consider Spanish 3 and 4; possibly music and band?

Offer Spanish 5, band program, art, and advanced lab, expand AP offerings, especially online

State Priority 7

State Priority 8

Page 59 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

and student satisfaction levels

16 approved by UC/CSU system during summer 2015; need to find other electives that are UC approved

NEED: Revamped LOC and PE Curricula

METRIC: Student learning in LOC and PE, CACC promotion test pass rates;

LOC and PE curricula will be revamped


NVMI Initial effort to revamp curriculum and align with curriculum maps and benchmarks; needs another round of professional development for

50% of students will complete the “one rank per semester” CACC expectation



State Priority 7

State Priority 8

Page 60 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

student satisfaction levels

military faculty; need promotion test data

NEED: Robust leadership development through the CACC

METRIC: AGI scores; Athletic participation rates and successes, parent/student satisfaction levels

Full implementation of the CACC model


NVMI AGI not conducted this year because of Excellent score last year; intramurals participation rate much better than last year, buts still room for improvement

CACC Annual General Inspection AGI score of Superior

AGI score of Superior

AGI score of Superior

NVMI Priority #8 (NVMI’s four pillars of academics, leadership, citizenship, and athletics will be strengthened and measured regularly)

Page 61 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Expanded intramurals and interscholastic athletics

METRIC: Number of intramural and interscholastic sports offered and participation rates; parent and student satisfaction levels

NVMIs interscholastic and intramurals athletics programs will be expansive and in line with similar military academies nationwide


NVMI Intramurals 7-week cycle implemented with moderate success; need more excitement and involvement. Offered HS Fall girls VB, co-ed X Country, Winter boys and girls BB and boys and girls Soccer, and Spring boys VB, softball, and baseball. For MS offered boys and

Participation in CIF as a supplemental league member

All students will participate in intramurals and 25% of eligible students will participate in an interscholastic sports team

Participation in CIF as a supplemental league member (year two of a two year process)

All students will participate in intramurals and 45% of eligible students will participate in an interscholastic

Participation in CIF as a full league member

All students will participate in intramurals and 65% of eligible students will participate in an interscholastic sports team

NVMI Priority 8 (NVMI’s four pillars of academics, leadership, citizenship, and athletics will be strengthened and measured regularly)

Page 62 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

girls soccer, BB, flag football, volleyball

sports team

NEED: Expanded school and community service opportunities

METRIC: Community service hour totals

100% of cadets will complete at least 20 hours of school service per year and 20 hours of community service per year


NVMI Unit Comm Svc about the same as last year; CACC Unit Comm Svc Award 1st place; added blood drive; need expanded offerings; better system to track service





Page 63 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Automation of citizenship tracking systems

METRIC: Successful operation of an automated system; parent and student satisfaction levels

By the 2016-2017 SY a fully integrated and automated citizenship tracking system for merits and demerits will be deployed


NVMI Automated system is far more successful than last year; daily emails re: demerits and merits; detention reporting is electronic; upload of M/D totals to PSchl

TBD TBD By the 2016-2017 SY a fully integrated and automated citizenship tracking system for merits and demerits will be deployed


Page 64 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Fitnessgram scores increase

METRIC: Fitnessgram scores

All students will be in the Healthy Fitness Zone in at least 5 or the 6 categories on the Fitnessgram test


NVMI Fitnessgram administered quarters 1, 2, 3 in prep for final administration in Q4; Still need end of year data

50% of students will be in the Healthy Fitness Zone in at least 5 or the 6 categories on the Fitnessgram test



NVMI Priority 8 (NVMI’s four will be strengthened and measured regularly)

NEED: Schoolwide Athletic Challenges

METRIC: % of students who successfully

All students will complete their annual fitness challenge; all new students with “catch up” to complete challenges offered prior to

Al students in all subgroups

NVMI Challenges defined

Mile cadence run offered: 308 successfully completed;

High ropes

Define all challenges with input from school community; offer all challenges at least once during the 14-

65% of students complete their appropriate challenges

75% of students complete their appropriate challenges

NVMI Priority 8 (NVMI’s four will be strengthened and measured regularly)

Page 65 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

complete challenges annually and end up with their names on the perpetual plaque

their enrollment

offered: 92 completed; 5K run offered: 81 completed; 35 mi bike ride not offered; other events not offered

15 SY

NEED: Fiscal soundness

METRIC: Balanced budgets, economic reserve, fund raising amounts, school

Balanced budget, economic reserve of at least $1,000,000 and full school enrollments


NVMI Major fiscal challenges due to increased enrollment without funding “catching up” as well as fluctuation in enrollment;

Balanced budget

Enrollment of 380

Economic reserve of $250,000

Enrollment of 480

Economic reserve of $500,000

Enrollment of 580

NVMI Priority 9 (NVMI will be fiscally sound and well governed)

Page 66 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

enrollment levels

currently below 350, which is far below 380 budget projections; results in $300K plus operating deficit which currently appears to be more than $600K

Page 67 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Revised board bylaws and enhanced board membership

METRIC: Board membership levels and approved revised bylaws

There will be 12 members on the board and revamped board bylaws by the end of the charter term


NVMI No progress 7 members on the board by the end of the SY

First draft of revised board bylaws

9 members on the board by the end of the SY

Fully revised board bylaws

12 members on the board by the end of the SY


Page 68 of 101




progress?)

Goals

Annual Update:









Description of Goal

Applicable Pupil

Subgroups (Identify



School(s) Affected





LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-2015

Year 2: 2015-2016

Year 3: 2016-2017

NEED: Revamped school website

METRIC: Revamped school website that parents, students, and outside visitors report as usable and meets needs

Revamped school website that is user friendly and contains all necessary information (Calendar, Schedule, Hawk Weekly, etc)


NVMI Website revamped; increasing weekly “hits”; more robust posting of front page photos and information; need teachers to update pages weekly (about two thirds accomplishing this currently)

Revamped school website that is user friendly and contains all necessary information

Surveys of school community and outside visitors to site; need PD on website creation and enhancement

TBD NVMI Priority 9 (NVMI will be fiscally sound and well governed)

Page 69 of 101

Section 3: Actions, Services, and Expenditures

Instructions: Identify annual actions to be performed to meet the goals described in Section 2, and describe expenditures to implement each action, and where these expenditures can be found in the LEA’s budget. Actions may describe a group of services that are implemented to achieve identified goals. The actions and expenditures must reflect details within a goal for the specific subgroups identified in Education Code section 52052, including pupils with disabilities, and for specific school sites as applicable. In describing the actions and expenditures that will serve low-income, English learner, and/or foster youth pupils as defined in Education Code section 42238.01, the LEA must identify whether supplemental and concentration funds are used in a districtwide, schoolwide, countywide, or charterwide manner. In the annual update, the LEA must describe any changes to actions as a result of a review of progress. The LEA must reference all fund sources used to support actions and services. Expenditures must be classified using the California School Accounting Manual as required by Education Code sections 52061, 52067, and 47606.5.

Guiding Questions:

1) What actions/services will be provided to all pupils, to subgroups of pupils identified pursuant to Education Code section 52052, to specific school sites, to English learners, to low-income pupils, and/or to foster youth to achieve goals identified in the LCAP?

2) How do these actions/services link to identified goals and performance indicators? 3) What expenditures support changes to actions/services as a result of the goal identified? Where can these expenditures be found in the

LEA’s budget? 4) In the annual update, how have the actions/services addressed the needs of all pupils and did the provisions of those services result in

the desired outcomes? 5) In the annual update, how have the actions/services addressed the needs of all subgroups of pupils identified pursuant to Education

Code section 52052, including, but not limited to, English learners, low-income pupils, and foster youth; and did the provision of those actions/services result in the desired outcomes?

6) In the annual update, how have the actions/services addressed the identified needs and goals of specific school sites and did the provision of those actions/services result in the desired outcomes?

7) In the annual update, what changes in actions, services, and expenditures have been made as a result of reviewing past progress and/or changes to goals?

Page 70 of 101

A. What annual actions, and the LEA may include any services that support these actions, are to be performed to meet the goals described in Section 2 for ALL pupils and the goals specifically for subgroups of pupils identified in Education Code section 52052 but not listed in Table 3B below (e.g., Ethnic subgroups and pupils with disabilities)? List and describe expenditures for each fiscal year implementing these actions, including where these expenditures can be found in the LEA’s budget.

Goal

(Include and identify all goals from Section 2)

Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)

Actions and Services

Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)

Annual Update: Review

of actions/

services

What actions are performed or services provided in each year (and are projected to be provided in

years 2 and 3)? What are the anticipated expenditures for each action (including funding

source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

All teachers have clear credentials

State priority 1

Credential analysis SCHOOL See annual progress noted in section 2 above

Credential analysis

Same Same

100% of courses will be taught by teachers will proper credentials

State Priority 1

Same as above SCHOOL See annual progress noted in section 2 above

Same as above Same Same

Page 71 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

100% of A-G courses will have CCSS aligned textbooks and instructional materials

State Priority 1

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

Purchase CPM texts

Purchase ELA/ELD materials

SCHOOL See annual progress noted in section 2 above

$80,000 for CPM texts

Newsela $5000

Newsela

Analysis and selection of books for Sci/SS and ELA

Science, Social Studies; ELA texts to be purchased

School facility maintained in excellent condition; repairs ASAP

State Priority 1

State Priority 6

Ongoing maintenance schedule SCHOOL See annual progress noted in section 2

$10,000 in operating budget;

LAUSD site; $50,000 budgeted

LAUSD site; $50,000 budgeted

At least 50% of NVMI teachers are dually credentialed in Multiple Subjects/Single Subjects AND mild/moderate RSP

State Priority 1

State Priority 4

SPED Credential program through university


None $50,000 plus a need to identify grant funding sources

TBD

Page 72 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

CCSS Aligned curriculum maps created for all NVMI courses

State Priority State Priority 4

Summer work by Curriculum Committee chair after faculty work in June 2014 post-school year PD


$15,000 in additional salary for Curriculum Committee chairperson

$5000 in add’l salary

$5000 in add’l salary

Professional Development in Common Core Standards for all teachers specific to their disciplines

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

Summer PD opportunities self-identified by teachers

August 2014 PD week including CCSS PD

2014-15 PD opportunities schoolwide and as requested by teachers


$10,000 budgeted for teacher identified PD opportunities

40 hrs/per T of PD $10K budgeted

40 hrs/per T of PD cost $10K budgeted

Students receive technology based pre-assessments, interventions, and post-assessments of performance in math and

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

State Priority

OARS purchased and PD for staff on creating assessments

iReady program purchased

Personal computing devices with internet access purchased


$4000 for OARS

$20,000 for iReady

Erate dollars for personal devices

$4000 for OARS

$20,000 for iReady or?

??? for personal devices with

$4000 for OARS

$20,000 for iReady or?

??? for personal

Page 73 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

ELA/ELD 6 with internet access

Sprint Grant

internet access

Sprint Grant

devices with internet access

Sprint Grant

NVMI will implement computer based assessments of student achievement levels aligned with SBAC Assessments

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

OARS purchased and PD for staff on creating assessments

iReady program purchased

Personal computing devices with internet access purchased


$4000 for OARS

$20,000 for iReady or?? for personal devices w/ internet access; Sprint Grant

Same? Same?

NVMI will implement a technology based tool for classroom walk throughs and observations by admin/peers

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

Review of available apps for Smartphones


0 – done for free with Google docs

Free Free

Page 74 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

Specific EL strategies will be implemented in all NVMI classrooms across all academic disciplines

State Priority 2

State Priority 4

PD on EL Strategies

Word wall supplies provided

Graphic organizer supplies provided


$500 for additional office supplies to implement EL strategies

$1000 for PD on CPM Study Team Strategies (Michele Sutorik)

TBD

Page 75 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

100% of new parents participate in new parent orientation

100% of platoons are represented at PAC meetings

100% of parents attend Back to School Night and Student Led Conferences

100% of parents complete service hours

State Priority 3

State Priority 6

New Parent Orientation Summer 2014

Returning Parent Orientation Summer 2014

PAC meetings monthly

SSC meetings monthly

Back to School Night in August

Parent Service Hour tracking system


$800 for parent orientation supplies

$1000 for supplies; need to continue to work with PAC on engagement strategies to promote maximum parental participation

$1000 for supplies

Page 76 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

Students in all subgroups proficient in all subjects and show significant growth on internal interim assessments

85% demonstrate CELDT growth

95% of students reclassified within 3 years at NVMI

State Priority 4

PD as noted above

Interim assessments as noted above

Targeted student support as noted below

CCSS aligned curricula as noted both above and below

Student academic and personal counseling supports as noted below


No additional expenditures as these items ate all duplicates of content from other action steps



Page 77 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

All students requiring academic support will receive the necessary support to ensure proficiency in all subjects

State Priority 4

State Priority 6

Academic support revamp structure

Saturday school revamp for students with missing assignments

Before School homework help

Learning Resource Center added to both SPED population and gen ed population with one teacher full time and one aide full time


Pay for Academic Support teachers (average of 4 per day X 2 hours X $40/hour = $320/day X 175 days = $56,000

Saturday school = 30 days @4 hours/day X $40 per hour = $4800

175 days X $60/day (1.5 hours) = $10,500

$70,000 for teacher including benefits

$40,000 for aid including

ASSETS and/or ASES grant? Same as previous year?

ASSETS and/or ASES grant? Same as previous year?

Page 78 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

benefits

Above part time stipends also include approx. $14500 in additional benefits

An interim assessment system and data warehouse will be purchased and implemented fully.

State Priority 4

OARS as noted above SCHOOL See annual progress noted in section 2 above

No additional expense



Page 79 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17


25% Of seniors have taken and passed two AP exams or community college courses

State Priority 4

State Priority 6

No specific activities in year 1; in year 2, anticipate addition of at least two Community College courses on the NVMI campus, which would cost approx. $15,000 plus the cost of books (estimated to be $2000)


No specific activities in year 1; in year 2, anticipate addition of at least two Community College courses on NVMI campus -cost approx. $15,000 plus the cost of books (estimated to be $2000)

TBD depending on budget; currently no plans to set aside $ for this; working with CA Comm Coll Board to pass legislation that would make the courses free to NVMI students

TBD



State Priority 4

State Priority 6

Academic counselor meetings with students and families


Addition of personal counselor = $80,000 inclusive of benefits

Academic counselor works individually with students to promote pass rates

Academic counselor continues to work individually with students

Page 80 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

100% of SPED students needing academic support will receive it

Proficiency levels of SPED students will be equivalent to that of the schoolwide population

State Priority 4

State Priority 6

After School academic support for SPED students

Learning Resource Center as noted above

Before school homework help in the LRC included in expenses noted above

iReady program will be used to assess and create student specific interventions


Approx $30,000 inclusive of stipends and benefits

No additional expense other than those noted above regarding LRC

Before school HW help expenses noted above

iReady expense as noted above

Additional SPED personnel =$250,000

Continued additional personnel (depending on enrollment and SPED needs)

Page 81 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17


50%> students ready and 75% “ready of conditionally ready” for college English and math as noted in EAP

75% have completed a Bachelors degree within six years of graduation

State Priority 4

No additional specific action steps other than those noted elsewhere to improve overall academic preparation of all NVMI students, including academic support, presence of the academic and personal counselors, interim assessment data to drive instruction and intervention, and SPED support, in addition to EL strategies implemented schoolwide


No additional specific action steps other than those noted elsewhere to improve overall academic preparation of all NVMI students



A minimum of 4000 books will be available for SSR activities

State Priority 4

Book purchase in year 1 = $20,000

L4U textbook tracking system = $5000

Personnel to input book info to L4U = $5000


Book purchase in year 1 = $20,000

L4U textbook tracking system = $5000

Personnel to input book info to L4U = $5000

Move to SVHS Campus changes this; specific action steps TBD

See year 2

Page 82 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

100% of students will participate to minimum English-department established standard for Accelerated Reader program and all students will be reading at grade level

State Priority 4

AR program purchase

AR PD

AR incentives


AR program purchase = $4000

AR PD = $500

AR incentives = $1500

Same as year 1 Same as year 1

NVMI will have an approved Technology plan that meets both State of California and e-rate requirements

State Priority 4

Existing tech plan was approved in June 2014; requires revamping in Curriculum Committee


No additional expense other than human capital to revamp

Need additional revisions to tech plan from schoolwide input

Need additional revisions to tech plan once again

A school library that meets CDE minimum recommended standards

State Priority 4

In year 1 of LCAP, no implementation; only research


No expense Campus move to SVHS; will use SVHS library

TBD

Page 83 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

95% or greater ADA

Less than 5 % of students with 3> unexcused absences in a semester

Zero dropouts


State Priority 5

Attendance incentives

Hiring two part time attendance clerks to better track attendance

SART/SARB process


Incentives = $2500

Part time attendance clerks with salary/benefits = $50,000

SART/SARB personnel hours expense = $15,000

One full time attendance clerk; continued reporting and identification of students with poor attendance

Same as year 2

100% of students requiring support from a personal counselor receive that support

State Priority 5

State Priority 6

Personal counselor SCHOOL See annual progress noted in section 2 above

Salary and benefits = $70,000 + Intern supervisor costs of $10,000

Continuation from year 1

Continuation from year 1

Page 84 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17


State Priority 5

Academic counselor to initiate PLPs and family meetings



Academic counselor creates PLPs and parents and students sign off

Academic counselor creates PLPs and parents and students sign off


State Priority 5

State Priority 6

Director of Instruction will analyze data

PD on ways to intervene



Need specific action steps based on high failure rates form 14-15

TBD


State Priority 5

Surveys of students

Intervention lists created with those who do not identify an adult by name


No additional expense; TAC teams and Admin team to take names of students unable to identify a caring adult on campus and split

Need survey; no expense

TBD

Page 85 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

the list to ensure all students are targeted and supported

100% of students will report satisfaction with the Hawk Exchange and its inherent structure

State Priority 5

HX supplies

Hiring part time HX manager


HX Supplies = $50,000

HX manager salary and benefits = $30,000

$100,,000 budgeted; need to explore grant opportunities; HX manager full time $70,000 with benefits

TBD

100% of students will have the opportunity to participate in after school and outdoor education

State Priority 5

After School program costs for enrichment and outdoor education activities, including CACC events, arts, technology, student empowerment activities, etc.


$65,000 in year one to fund those activities

$65,000 from general school operating; rest from ASSETs grant

Same as year 2

Page 86 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17


State Priority 5

State Priority 8

Limited in year 1; personal counselor to identify

CSUN interns to be utilized at no expense to school


Limited in year 1; personal counselor to identify

CSUN interns to be utilized at no expense to NVMI

Need mentoring program implemented

TBD




State Priority 6

Full time enrolment and admissions manager, 15% of salary and benefits to student retention efforts

Also, activities noted above directly and indirectly contribute to student retention and satisfaction


15% of Enrollment and Admissions Director position salary and benefits = $12,000

Need data; Admissions officer working on this issue

TBD

Page 87 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

Suspension and expulsion rates will be lower than LAUSD

State Priority 6

Explore alternatives to suspension and expulsion

Provide intensive supports through academic and personal counseling as noted elsewhere in the LCAP


No additional expenses other than costs of academic and personal counselors

Dean to publish data; SSC to discuss possible action steps; implementing on campus room for students with discipline issues

Based on data from 15-16, make adjustments in plan as appropriate

Permanent School site to accommodate long term enrollment projections

State Priority 6

NVMI Priority 9

Expenses unknown in year 1; partnership with ACRE Corporation may yield some potential donors to the facilities effort; master facility planning is a must for the board and school leadership


Costs unknown $540,000 budgeted for LAUSD SVHS Colocation agreement

Upward adjustment based on increased enrollment

Robust school emergency plan with necessary supports to implement

State Priority 6

Purchase of Rapid Responder program and creation of robust emergency response plan through their system

SCHOOL See annual progress noted in section 2

$3500 which may be offset by recruiting additional schools to participate in

Not to implement Rapid Responder; align with LAUSD plan

Align with LAUSD site emergency response plan

Page 88 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

Implementation of tabletop drills for all hazards and monthly drills and scenarios or exercises

above Rapid Responder program

moving forward

All students are exposed to a robust academic program in all domains

State Priority 7

State Priority 8

See notes throughout LCAP SCHOOL See annual progress noted in section 2 above

See notes throughout LCAP



LOC and PE curricula will be revamped

State Priority 7

State Priority 8

Summer 2014 effort to revamp curriculum maps and provide intensive PD to all milstaff

Will need additional PE equipment



Pursuing grant through Good Sports.com web based grant program

Need revamping and analysis of impact; no additional expense

Continued Goodsports.com grant

TBD

Page 89 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

Full implementation of the CACC model


Specific action steps to be developed in Summer 2014 PD with military staff


No additional expenses anticipated

Work with COL Morden to analyze best practices for full implementation of CACC Model; COL Morden on campus 3 days a week

Continue implementation of plan from COL Morden

NVMIs interscholastic and intramurals athletics programs will be expansive and in line with similar military academies nationwide

NVMI Priority 8 (NVMI’s four pillars of academics, leadership, citizenship, and athletics will be

CIF membership

Intramurals program plan

Interscholastic coaches, uniforms, transportation, referees, supplies, etc.


CIF membership = $2500

Intramurals program plan

Interscholastic coaches, uniforms,

Year 2 of associate membership; expand offerings; budget $55,000

First year of full regular membership – need $100,000 budget plus full time Athletic Director position for both MS and HS

Page 90 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

strengthened and measured regularly)

transportation, referees, supplies, etc. = $45,000

Participation in FIYA for MS athletics

athletics

Continue MS FIYA participation


NVMI Priority #8 (as noted above)

Community service planning assigned to a full time military staff member and Director of Admissions and Enrollment (Community Outreach)

Transportation costs will be based on plan proposed by milstaff member


Transportation costs estimated at $15,000; private funding sources to be sought for this

Need community service coordinator position from faculty/staff to help coordinate efforts

TBD

Page 91 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

By the 2016-2017 SY a fully integrated and automated citizenship tracking system for merits and demerits will be deployed


The LAUSD transition to MiSIS complicates this tremendously

The current plan was to integrate with PowerSchool but the unknowns of MiSIS migration make it an unknown expense and timeline


The LAUSD transition to MiSIS complicates this tremendously

The current plan was to integrate with PowerSchool but the unknowns of MiSIS migration make it an unknown expense and timeline

Continued implementation of Howard / Evalumetrics citizenship program managed by Ms. French

Consider options with MiSIS after full implementation by LAUSD

Page 92 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

All students will be in the Healthy Fitness Zone in at least 5 or the 6 categories on the Fitnessgram test


Focused PE instruction

See notes about PE equipment above


See notes about PE equipment above

Continued revamping of PE curriculum

All LOC teachers will have a PE credential by end of the school year

Fully credentialed PE teachers will implement fully standards-aligned lessons on each Tuesday and Thursday PE is offered

Balanced budget, economic reserve of at least $1,000,000 and full school enrollments


Budget planning involving the school community (begin with the LCAP process) and will be continued using the SSC

SCHOOL No progress made in 14/15; operating deficit of $300,000 plus

No specific budgetary expense

No progress anticipated but budget is projected to be balanced

Projection of $250,000 reserve

Page 93 of 101

Goal


Related State and

Local Priorities

(from Section 2)


Level of

Service

(Indicate if

school-wide or

LEA-wide)


of actions/

services



source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

There will be 12 members on the board and revamped board bylaws by the end of the charter term


Recruiting board members SCHOOL See annual progress noted in section 2 above

No expense No expense No expense

Revamped school website that is user friendly and contains all necessary information


Website consultant

School stakeholder meetings to discuss web site needs and ideals


Consultant fees = $7500

No expense No expense

Page 94 of 101

B. Identify additional annual actions, and the LEA may include any services that support these actions, above what is provided for all pupils that will serve low-income, English learner, and/or foster youth pupils as defined in Education Code section 42238.01 and pupils redesignated as fluent English proficient. The identified actions must include, but are not limited to, those actions that are to be performed to meet the targeted goals described in Section 2 for low-income pupils, English learners, foster youth and/or pupils redesignated as fluent English proficient (e.g., not listed in Table 3A above). List and describe expenditures for each fiscal year implementing these actions, including where those expenditures can be found in the LEA’s budget.

Goal

(Include and identify all goals from Section 2, if applicable)

Related State and Local

Priorities (from Section 2)


Level of Service

(Indicate if school-wide or LEA-wide)

Annual Update:

Review of actions/

services

What actions are performed or services provided in each year (and are projected to be

provided in years 2 and 3)? What are the anticipated expenditures for each action

(including funding source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

Since more than 85% of the NVMI community is low income, all goals relate to low income pupils

All For low income pupils:

Schoolwide See annual progress noted in section 2 above

See actions noted in above section

N/A N/A

Goals noted above relate to EL strategies as well as overall

All For English learners:


See actions noted in above section

N/A N/A

Page 95 of 101

Goal

(Include and identify all goals from Section 2, if applicable)

Related State and Local

Priorities (from Section 2)


Level of Service

(Indicate if school-wide or LEA-wide)

Annual Update:

Review of actions/

services

What actions are performed or services provided in each year (and are projected to be

provided in years 2 and 3)? What are the anticipated expenditures for each action

(including funding source)?

LCAP YEAR

Year 1: 2014-15 Year 2: 2015-16 Year 3: 2016-17

academic goals noted above

All of the above will apply to foster youth who attend NVMI

All For foster youth: Schoolwide See annual progress noted in section 2 above

See above for action steps and budget expenditures

N/A N/A

Redesignated pupils will be affected by all action steps and goals noted above

All For redesignated fluent English proficient pupils:


See above for action steps and budget expenditures

N/A N/A

Page 96 of 101

C. Describe the LEA’s increase in funds in the LCAP year calculated on the basis of the number and concentration of low income, foster youth, and English learner pupils as determined pursuant to 5 CCR 15496(a)(5). Describe how the LEA is expending these funds in the LCAP year. Include a description of, and justification for, the use of any funds in a districtwide, schoolwide, countywide, or charterwide manner as specified in 5 CCR 15496. For school districts with below 55 percent of enrollment of unduplicated pupils in the district or below 40 percent of enrollment of unduplicated pupils at a school site in the LCAP year, when using supplemental and concentration funds in a districtwide or schoolwide manner, the school district must additionally describe how the services provided are the most effective use of funds to meet the district’s goals for unduplicated pupils in the state priority areas. (See 5 CCR 15496(b) for guidance.)

The estimated increase in funds in the LCAP year calculated on the basis of the number and concentration of low income, foster youth, and English learner pupils as determined pursuant to 5 CCR 15496(a)(5) is approximately $1,400,000, which includes the additional income associated with an increase in student enrollment of approximately 150 students. The net increase WITHOUT the additional 150 students would be approximately $460,000. The expenditures noted in section 3 of the LCAP have been targeted to support all students, including: • Hiring an academic counselor and a personal counselor ($130,000 with salary and benefits) • Additional funding to support increased special education population and intensify support for special education students ($225,000) • Funding for before school homework help and a revamped Academic Support program ($75,000) • Funding for highly qualified TAC Teams that support all aspects of cadet development ($200,000 in salary and benefits) • Funding for an enhanced comprehensive athletic program and an enhanced outdoor education program ($85,000) • Funding for access to a before and after school enrichment program ($70,000) • Adoption of texts and materials for the CPM math curriculum ($65,000) • Funding for access to the newsela.com site for informational text aligned with lexile levels of student readers ($10000) • Funding for classroom libraries and the Accelerated Reader and STAR Renaissance assessment programs ($15,000) • Full implementation of interim assessments aligned with the Common Core ($15000 in stipends for assessment development) • Funding to pay teachers for development and implementation of curriculum maps for all courses aligned with the Common Core ($5000)

D. Consistent with the requirements of 5 CCR 15496, demonstrate how the services provided in the LCAP year for low income pupils, foster youth, and English learners provide for increased or improved services for these pupils in proportion to the increase in funding provided for such pupils in that year as calculated pursuant to 5 CCR 15496(a)(7). Identify the percentage by which services for unduplicated pupils must be increased or improved as compared to the services provided to all pupils in the LCAP year as calculated pursuant to 5 CCR 15496(a). An LEA shall describe how the proportionality percentage is met using a quantitative and/or qualitative description of the increased and/or improved services for unduplicated pupils as compared to the services provided to all pupils.

Page 97 of 101

NVMI has exceptionally large numbers of low income, EL, SPED, and Latino students. As such, the first year LCAP takes additional funds and prioritizes expenditures of those funds based on the input from stakeholders about what expenditures would have the greatest impact on achieving schoolwide goals. At the conclusion of the first year, the LCAP will be revisited and additional data will be available to make decisions about prioritizing courses of action and funding elements.

NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 42238.07 and 52064, Education Code. Reference: Sections 2574, 2575, 42238.01, 42238.02, 42238.03, 42238.07,

47605, 47605.5, 47606.5, 48926, 52052, 52060-52077, and 64001, Education Code; 20 U.S.C. Section 6312.

Page 98 of 101

Page 99 of 101

Page 100 of 101

Page 101 of 101

North Valley Military Institute College Preparatory Academy Governing Board

SPEAKER CARD

Date: _____________________ Name: _____________________________

I wish to address the NVMI Governing Board on the following subject:

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

Agenda Item Number: ___________________________________________

Check one:

¨ Parent

¨ Student

¨ Teacher

¨ School Staff

¨ Community Member

I understand that I am limited to three minutes. I also understand that on items that are not on the agenda, the Board may not take action pursuant to Board and State regulations.

Signed: __________________________________________________________

This information is a Public Record

Please state your full name and affiliation with NVMI when you begin your remarks in order that the official minutes record your appearance before the Governing Board.

Documents

North Valley Military Institute - Board of Directors ...the board consider the sale of receivables to Charter School Capital. IX. ACTION – The Director of Operations requests the