21
North Carolina Economic Outlook Mark Vitner, Managing Director & Senior Economist January 03, 2018

North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

North Carolina Economic Outlook

Mark Vitner, Managing Director & Senior Economist

January 03, 2018

Page 2: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 2

The Economy Has Solid Momentum At The Start of the New Year

Economic Outlook

Fiscal Policy

Tax cuts have finally become a reality and will likely be more impactful than consensus estimates. We looking for consumer spending and business investment to kick up a notch. An infrastructure program is likely in 2018.

Monetary Policy

The post-financial crisis era is over and monetary policy is now focusing on normalizing interest rates and financial regulation. Inflation and interest rates may rise slightly more than currently expected in 2018.

Soft Data Strength

The persistent strength in various economic surveys reflects improving job prospects, a lightening regulatory burden and a reviving manufacturing sector. A broader economic recovery will lift more industries and regions.

North Carolina

North Carolina’s economic recovery gained considerable strength during the past couple of years, although gains have largely been limited to the Triangle and Charlotte. Growth is now broadening to include most metro areas.

Real GDP growth accelerated during the second and third quarters of 2017 and the improved pace of growth appears to be carrying over in 2018. Growth is not only stronger but much more broadly based.

Page 3: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 3

Economic Growth

Real GDP growth accelerated during the spring and summer.

The improvement reflects stronger global growth and a

lessening of burdensome regulations, which have helped

revive capital spending.

Real GDP growth has slowed during the first quarter of the

past few years. This year may be an exception, as strong holiday

season sales likely cleared inventories and bolstered company balance sheets.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

U.S. Real GDP Bars = CAGR Line = Yr/Yr Percent Change

GDP - CAGR: Q3 @ 3.2%

GDP - Yr/Yr Percent Change: Q3 @ 2.3%

Forecast

Page 4: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 4

Inflation

After making steady progress toward the Fed’s 2 percent

inflation objective, most broad inflation measures have

remained below 2 percent since the last recession ended.

The recent moderation in core inflation is unnerving some

members of the FOMC, suggesting the Fed may be even

more cautious about raising short-term rates.

There are likely a mix of structural and cyclical forces restraining inflation that may

prove to be long lasting.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18

PCE Deflator vs. Core PCE DeflatorYear-over-Year Percent Change

PCE Deflator: Oct @ 1.6%

"Core" PCE Deflator: Oct @ 1.4%

FOMC's 2.0% Inflation Target

Page 5: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 5

Metro Area GDP

Raleigh, and other tech-driven metros, remain the fastest

growing economies.

Years of sustained growth are creating challenges, however.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7%

San Jose, CA

San Francisco, CA

Raleigh, NC

Austin, TX

Seattle, WA

Tampa, FL

Sacramento, CA

Las Vegas, NV

Atlanta, GA

Charlotte, NC

Nashville, TN

Jacksonville, FL

San Antonio, TX

Salt Lake City, UT

Dallas-Fort Worth, TX

Metro Area GDP Growth: Top 15Year-over-Year Percent Change in Real GDP, 2016

Page 6: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 6

The Geographic Mix of Growth Has Shifted

Wake and Durham counties accounted for the bulk of job

gains earlier in the expansion, as residents and businesses moved

back toward the city center.

Job growth has since broadened and more growth is occurring in

outlying areas. Job growth in Wake County is moderating.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Thousands

Thousands

Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill CSA Job Gain by CountyYear-over-Year Level Change in Annual Averages, Thousands

WakeDurhamOrangeOther Counties in CSA

Forecast

Page 7: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 7

Income Polarization

While job growth has been solid, income gains have remained

elusive for many workers.

Job growth in Raleigh has been stronger at the high-end and

low-end of the wage spectrum.

The income divide is a national issue and has made economic

mobility more challenging.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Raleigh Occupational EmploymentChange in Jobs 2013-2016 in Ths., 2016 Average Hourly Wages

Change in Jobs 2013-2016 (Left Axis)Average Hourly Wages (Right Axis)

Page 8: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 8

Labor Market Tightness

The Triangle’s lower unemployment rate has pulled wage increases higher, which is

something that much of the country has not yet seen.

While the labor market has certainly tightened, the Triangle

has grown solidly for long periods of time with an even lower unemployment rate.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities

-6%

-3%

0%

3%

6%

9%

12%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18

Raleigh CSA Unemployment vs. Avg. Hourly Earnings

Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill CSA Unemployment: Oct @ 3.7%Average Hourly Earnings: Nov @ 4.7%

Non Seasonally Adjusted, 12-MMA Year-over-Year Percent Change

Page 9: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

'02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16

Triangle Population ChangeLevel Change Over Year, Thousands

Suburban: 2016 @ 2.3K

Primary City: 2016 @ 14.6K

Migration

The movement back into the center city bolstered growth in Raleigh and Durham earlier in

the cycle, setting off battles over redevelopment and

gentrification.

Rising housing costs and sluggish median income growth

have spurred an affordability migration to outlying areas,

raising a new set of challenges in regards to land use and zoning.

Source: CoreLogic and Wells Fargo Securities

Page 10: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 10

0

5

10

15

20

0

5

10

15

20

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18

Thousands

Thousands

Raleigh MSA Housing Permits

Single-Family: Nov @ 8,436Single-Family, 12-MMA: Nov @ 10,841Multifamily, 12-MMA: Nov @ 3,162

Single-Family Average (1998-2003): 10,453

Thousands of Permits, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate

Housing Permits

2017 was a strong year for homebuilding in Raleigh.

Single-family housing permits surpassed their long-run

average and are now roughly in line with population gains.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities

Page 11: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 11

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Raleigh-Durham CSA Housing PermitsAnnual Level

WakeDurhamOrangeOther Counties in CSA

Housing Permits

Wake and Durham Counties accounted for the bulk of

housing starts earlier in the recovery, led by a boom in

apartment building and redevelopment of single-family

homes in closer-in neighborhoods.

More recently, growth has been shifting to the suburbs and

outlying areas.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities

Page 12: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 12

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18

CoreLogic Home Price IndexIndex, 2000=100, Not Seasonally Adjusted

United States: Oct @ 195.4

North Carolina: Oct @ 153.0

Raleigh, NC: Oct @ 151.3

Durham, NC: Oct @ 160.9

Home Prices

Home price appreciation has not seen the roller coaster ride that some other parts of the country have. Prices did not fall as hard during the housing slump and

have rebounded less dramatically than they did

nationwide.

Home prices in Raleigh and Durham have risen past their

previous highs, and affordability has become a bigger issue.

Source: CoreLogic and Wells Fargo Securities

Page 13: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 13

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Median List PriceMonthly Zillow Data, in Thousands

Raleigh: Nov @ $319.9KDurham: Nov @ $244.4KUnited States: Nov @ $259.9K

Home Prices

Home prices in the Triangle are now higher relative to the

national average, making the region less of a bargain

compared to similar sized markets in the Sunbelt.

While homes are less expensive in some neighboring areas, the Triangle still has lower home prices relative to other major tech hubs such as San Jose, Austin, Denver and Boston.

Source: CoreLogic and Wells Fargo Securities

Page 14: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 14

-1.5%

-1.0%

-0.5%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

-3.0%

-2.0%

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Raleigh-Durham Apartment Effective RentQuarter-over-Quarter Percent Change

Effective Rent Growth: Q3 @ 0.8% (Right Axis)

Year-over-Year: Q3 @ 4.4% (Left Axis)

Apartment Rents

The Triangle has seen a deluge of apartments come to market in

recent years. Many of these units have been high-end urban

developments, resulting in much higher average rents.

Source: Zillow, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities

Page 15: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 15

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

2.50

2.75

3.00

3.25

3.50

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

Raleigh Price-to-Income RatioQuarterly

Price-to-Income: Q3 @ 3.3

Long-run Average: 3.08

Affordability

While home prices have risen modestly in Raleigh relative to other rapidly growing markets, affordability has still become a critical issue. This is true across the nation, as wage growth has

lagged and income mobility appears to have slowed.

Source: Zillow, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities

Page 16: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 16

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

Raleigh Price-to-Rent RatioCoreLogic HPI, CPI Owners Equivalent Rent South

Price-to-Rent: Oct @ 0.56

Long-run Average (1987-Present): 0.55

Homeownership Still Makes Economic Sense

If you can afford to buy a home, homeownership makes

economic sense.

With rents rising so rapidly, the ratio of home prices to rents

remains only slightly above its long-run average.

Source: Zillow, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities

Page 17: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 17

The Triangle Is Poised For Another Strong Year

Economic Outlook

Employment & Income Growth

Job growth is expected to be slightly stronger in 2018, with the metro area adding close to 25,000 net new jobs. Employment growth remains skewed toward the upper and lower end but income gains should be larger in 2018.

Interest Rates & Housing

The Federal Reserve will likely hike interest rates at least three times this year but mortgage rates will rise only modestly. We look for single-family construction to rise solidly in 2018 but apartment construction will cool.

Affordability Migration

Years of strong growth have pushed housing costs higher, particularly in areas close to city centers. Higher housing costs have set off an affordability migration to the suburbs, fueling numerous zoning battles.

Infrastructure

President Trump has hinted that his attention is to shift toward boosting infrastructure investment. There is no pot of money to fund infrastructure, however, and much of the responsibility will fall back to local governments.

The Triangle has been growing roughly twice as fast as the nation and will continue to do so this year. Tax reform is expected to meaningfully boost capital spending, which will provide an added boost to the tech sector.

Page 18: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 18

U.S. Economic Forecast

Wells Fargo U.S. Economic Forecastq 4 2 01 7

2017

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

Real Gross Domestic Product 1 1.2 3.1 3.2 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 1.5 2.3 2.7 2.6

Personal Consumption 1.9 3.3 2.2 3.0 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5 3.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6

Business Fixed Investment 7.2 6.7 4.7 5.4 4.8 4.1 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 2.3 -0.6 4.6 4.7 3.7

Equipment 4.4 8.8 10.8 7.6 5.4 4.3 4.2 3.7 3.7 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.5 -3.4 4.6 6.2 3.7

Intellectual Property Products 5.7 3.7 5.2 4.1 5.2 4.8 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 3.8 6.3 4.1 4.7 4.6

Structures 14.8 7.0 -7.0 1.0 3.0 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 -1.8 -4.1 5.3 1.3 2.4

Residential Construction 11.1 -7.3 -4.7 9.0 6.0 8.0 7.5 7.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 10.2 5.5 1.6 4.9 6.0

Government Purchases -0.6 -0.2 0.7 2.5 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.4 0.8 0.1 0.9 0.7

Net Exports 2 0.2 0.2 0.4 -0.5 -0.2 -0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 -0.7 -0.2 -0.2 -0.1 0.0

Inventories 2 -1.5 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.2 -0.4 -0.1 0.2 0.0

Nonfarm Payroll Change 3 166 187 128 212 170 165 160 155 150 150 145 145 226 187 173 163 148

Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.4 4.3 4.1 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7 5.3 4.9 4.4 4.0 3.8

Consumer Price Index 4 2.6 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.6 2.7 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 0.1 1.3 2.1 2.3 2.1

Quarter-End Interest Rates 5

Federal Funds Target Rate 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.75 2.75 0.27 0.52 1.25 2.06 2.63

Conventional Mortgage Rate 4.20 3.90 3.81 3.89 4.06 4.20 4.30 4.35 4.45 4.50 4.62 4.67 3.85 3.65 3.95 4.23 4.56

2 Year Note 1.27 1.38 1.47 1.80 2.00 2.25 2.45 2.60 2.70 2.80 2.93 3.00 0.69 0.83 1.48 2.33 2.86

10 Year Note 2.40 2.31 2.33 2.49 2.66 2.80 2.90 2.95 3.05 3.10 3.22 3.27 2.14 1.84 2.38 2.83 3.16

Forecast as of: December 21, 20171 Compound Annual Growth Rate Quarter-over-Quarter 2 Percentage Point Contribution to GDP 3 Average Monthly Change4 Year-over-Year Percentage Change 5 Annual Numbers Represent Averages

ForecastActual

2017 2018 2019

ForecastActual

Source: IHS Global Insight and Wells Fargo Securities

Page 19: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Appendix

Page 20: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook 20

Economic Outlook Group Publications

To view any of our past research please visit:

http://www.wellsfargo.com/economics

To join any of our research distribution lists please visit:http://www.wellsfargo.com/

economicsemail

A Sampling of Our Recent Special, Regional & Industry Commentary

Date Title Authors

U.S. MacroDecember-05 Are Millennials Moving Out and Settling Down? House & Vaisey

December-04 Understanding the Senate Tax Plan's Dynamic Score Brown, Pugliese & Kinnaman

December-04 Tax Package Next Steps: Reconciling Differences Brown, Pugliese & Kinnaman

November-27 Capitol Hill Update: Funding Deadline Looms Brown, Pugliese & Kinnaman

November-27 Five Potential Inflation Surprises for 2018 House & Vaisey

U.S. RegionalNovember-30 Western Economic Outlook: Fall 2017 Vitner & Feik

November-17 California Employment Conditions: October 2017 Vitner, Feik & Carmichael

November-17 Texas Payrolls Gain 71,500 Jobs in October Vitner, Feik & Carmichael

November-17 North Carolina Unemployment Still Stuck at 4.1 Percent Vitner, Feik & Carmichael

November-17 Florida Payrolls Rebound after Hurricane Irma Vitner, Feik & Carmichael

Global EconomyDecember-06 Australian Q3 GDP Results Just Shy of Expectations Quinlan & Seery

December-04 Brazilian Economy Back from the Brink Alemán, Nelson & Seery

December-01 Canadian Growth Slows, but Not as Much as Expected Quinlan

November-30 Swiss Economy Remains on Solid Footing in Q3 Bryson, Pugliese & Kinnaman

November-29 Swedish GDP Growth Moderates a Bit in Q3 Bryson & Pugliese

Interest Rates/Credit Market

December-06 Profits and Financing in the Nonfinancial Sector Silvia & Pershing

November-29 Mixed Credit Trends Among Businesses and Consumers Silvia & Seery

November-15 Continuity Doesn't Work When the Road is Changing Silvia

November-08 Monetary Policy Convergence: What About the ECB? Silvia & Kinnaman

November-07 Persistently Overshooting the Fed Funds Rate Silvia, Iqbal & Pershing

Real Estate & HousingDecember-06 The State of CRE: Q3 Chartbook Vitner, Carmichael & Vaisey

November-06 Return of the Affordability Migration Vitner & Carmichael

November-02 A Primer on the Architectural Billings Index Vitner & Vaisey

October-10 Housing Chartbook: October 2017 Vitner & Carmichael

September-12 A Primer on the NAHB Index Vitner & Carmichael

Recent Special Commentary

Page 21: North Carolina Economic Outlook · Seattle, WA Tampa, FL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Atlanta, GA Charlotte, NC Nashville, TN Jacksonville, FL San Antonio, TX Salt Lake City, UT Dallas-Fort

Economic Outlook

Wells Fargo Securities Economics Group

21

John E. Silvia [email protected]

Global Head of Research, Economics & Strategy

Diane Schumaker-Krieg ………………… ………[email protected]

Global Head of Research, Economics & Strategy

Chief Economist

Mark Vitner, Senior Economist [email protected]

Jay H. Bryson, Global Economist …[email protected]

Sam Bullard, Senior Economist [email protected]

Nick Bennenbroek, Currency Strategist [email protected]

Eugenio J. Alemán, Senior Economist [email protected]

Azhar Iqbal, Econometrician [email protected]

Tim Quinlan, Senior Economist [email protected]

Eric J. Viloria, Currency Strategist [email protected]

Senior Economists

Economists

Sarah House, Economist [email protected]

Michael A. Brown, Economist [email protected]

Jamie Feik, Economist [email protected]

Erik Nelson, Currency Strategist [email protected]

Economic Analysts

Administrative Assistants

Wells Fargo Securities Economics Group publications are produced by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, a U.S broker-dealer registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, theFinancial Industry Regulatory Authority, and the Securities Investor Protection Corp. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, distributes these publications directly and through subsidiaries including, butnot limited to, Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC, Wells Fargo Securities International Limited, Wells Fargo Securities Asia Limited and WellsFargo Securities (Japan) Co. Limited. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. ("WFS") is registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission as a futures commission merchant and is a memberin good standing of the National Futures Association. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("WFBNA") is registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission as a swap dealer and is a member ingood standing of the National Futures Association. WFS and WFBNA are generally engaged in the trading of futures and derivative products, any of which may be discussed within thispublication. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not compensate its research analysts based on specific investment banking transactions. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC’s research analysts receivecompensation that is based upon and impacted by the overall profitability and revenue of the firm which includes, but is not limited to investment banking revenue. The information andopinions herein are for general information use only. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not guarantee their accuracy or completeness, nor does Wells Fargo Securities, LLC assume any liabilityfor any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions. Such information and opinions are subject to change without notice, are for generalinformation only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sales of any security or as personalized investment advice. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC is aseparate legal entity and distinct from affiliated banks and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company © 2017 Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.

SECURITIES: NOT FDIC-INSURED/NOT BANK-GUARANTEED/MAY LOSE VALUE

Important Information for Non-U.S. Recipients

For recipients in the EEA, this report is distributed by Wells Fargo Securities International Limited ("WFSIL"). WFSIL is a U.K. incorporated investment firm authorized and regulated by theFinancial Conduct Authority. The content of this report has been approved by WFSIL a regulated person under the Act. For purposes of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority’s rules, this reportconstitutes impartial investment research. WFSIL does not deal with retail clients as defined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 2007. The FCA rules made under the FinancialServices and Markets Act 2000 for the protection of retail clients will therefore not apply, nor will the Financial Services Compensation Scheme be available. This report is not intended for, andshould not be relied upon by, retail clients. This document and any other materials accompanying this document (collectively, the "Materials") are provided for general informational purposesonly.

Donna LaFleur, Executive Assistant [email protected]

Dawne Howes, Administrative Assistant [email protected]

Michael Pugliese, Economic Analyst [email protected]

E. Harry Pershing, Economic Analyst [email protected]

Hank Carmichael, Economic Analyst [email protected]

Ariana Vaisey, Economic Analyst [email protected]

Abigail Kinnaman, Economic Analyst [email protected]

Shannon Seery, Economic Analyst [email protected]