Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Great Lakes Affiliate of College and University Residence Halls
No Frills 2014 Minutes
Saginaw Valley State University
Presiding Officer: Jenna Decker, GLACURH Director
Minutes Taken and Prepared by: Jacob Crosetto, GLACURH Associate Director
for Finance and Administration
Schools Represented Ball State University Central Michigan University DePaul University Eastern Illinois University Ferris State University Grand Valley State University Illinois Wesleyan University Indiana State University Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Marquette University Michigan State University North Central College Northern Illinois University Oakland University Purdue University Purdue University Calumet Saginaw Valley State University Southern Illinois University Carbondale University of St. Francis University of Evansville University of Guelph University of Illinois Chicago University of Illinois Springfield University of Illinois Urbana Champaign University of Michigan University of Windsor UW- Eau Claire UW- Green Bay UW- La Crosse UW- Milwaukee UW- Oshkosh UW- Platteville UW- River Falls UW- Stevens Point UW- Stout UW- Whitewater Western Illinois University Western Michigan University
Regional Board of Directors and Special Guests Jenna Decker, GLACURH Director Jacob Crosetto, GLACURH ADFA Andrew Haugen, GLACURH AD-NRHH Karlee Keiper, MI-RCC Becky Wintringer, WI-RCC Kevin Catlin, IL-RCC Lindsey Spencer, IN-RCC Sammi Stelzl, Parliamentarian Abbas Hill, Regional Advisor Michele Gunkelman, ART Coordinator Ashley Richey, NACURH NAA Chrissy Francisco, NSRO Director Jenny Kwon, NIC AD of Affiliations Sal DeSanto, NSRO AD-NRHH Fiona Erickson, CAACURH AD-NRHH Stephanie Harris, SWACURH AD-NRHH Stephanie Martinez, OCM 2014-2014 Elected Board Members and Conference Host Sites Andrew Haugen, Director, UW-Green Bay Jacob Crosetto, ADFA, UIS Matt Dela Cruz, AD-NRHH, UIC Christina Knowlton, WI-RCC, UW Stevens Point Ashley Stegall, IL-RCC, SIU-C Elliott Hendrick, IN-RCC, IUPUI Justin Schuch, ART Coordinator, SIU-C Indiana State University, GLACURH 2014 Host AAFN Inductees Jacob Crosetto, University of Illinois Springfield Jenna Decker, Western Illinois University Lindsey Spencer, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Becky Wintringer, University of Wisconsin Whitewater
Call to Order at 7:10 p.m. by Director Decker
Announcements
Roll Call
Parliamentary Procedure Presentation
Director Elections
Andrew Haugen
o Q&A
o CMU: If you are confident in Parli Pro ability?
Yes, I was RHAA President and ran all meetings with PP
o Windsor: Techniques for ON?
WhatsApp communication to Canadian Affiliates and have email and
text messaging. Been to Windsor and Guelph. Work with both school to
use them as an example and resource
o IUPUI: Time managing?
Bidding for CA position, but no longer applying. Feel very confident
with timeline and RA/Director position. Utilize past experience to jump
into goals with limited transition period
o Guelph: Yield to redundancy
o WIU: Presidents boardroom?
Work with other regional models for subregional president chats and see
if GLACURH would like to follow the idea.
o Purdue: Yield
o Whitewater: Skype chat encouragement?
Dialogue and Skype, showing personality and skyping in to see each
other. Always encourage the resource, it would be an advantage
o Carbondale: Yield to redundancy
o U of Michigan: This time next year?
Updating guides, RHA skype-ins, international affiliates not just with
Canada, reach out to IRHA, IRHO, etc.
o WIU: Greatest accomplishment thus far?
o TIME
o IUPUI moves to exhaust list
IUPUI seconds
o WIU: Greatest accomplishment:
I have been able to connect everyone on the board and make sure that
everyone feels included and heard. United the board, bring goal to
region.
Andrew Haugen
Melissa Jones
o Q&A
o MSU: What is your time commitment looking like?
Peer Advisor and Academic Advisor. 15/week commitment
o Carbondale: as director, how would you work with subregions?
Keep communication open, whether its constant emails or office hours,
anything that needs done
o Platteville: non-member school ideas?
Invite them to GLACURH Conference, give them opportunity to see what
it’s about
o U of Mich: How would GLACURH next year?
By this time next year, want to have a lot of communication and make them
feel comfortable and feel close. Believe that a happy RBD=Happy region,
bonding and closeness
o Guelph: International affiliates in GL?
Work with RBD and make Canada know what that would get into
o Purdue: PP?
Working knowledge
o Carbondale: End Q&A
Second by Purdue
Melissa Jones
Pro Con
Knowledge of parliamentary procedure Bid
Presentation Presentation
“work with a team toward a common goal” Experience
“transparency” Answers
Communication Goals
“you are the ones who fuel this fire” Time commitment
Pro Con
Skype Ins Bid
President’s Guide Presentation
Experience Experience
“Stronger GLACURH Committees” Greatest Accomplishment
Knowledge of subregions
Letters of recommendation Time commitments
Encourage international affiliates
Recognition of strengths in subregions Answers
“Unite you as a region”
“No transition period”
“MOWII Monday Videos”
“change things for the betterment of the organization”
Conference Attendance
Recognition “umm”
“office hours on Skype” “I don’t know”
Response time “national”
“Passion” “getting stuff done”
“getting stuff done”
Time commitments
Geoffrey Koester
o Q&A
o CMU: how are you currently in Parli Pro?
Competent enough to run boardroom and educate
o IUPUI: shoe size and leadership?
10.5, use footsteps to relate
o Milwaukee: modernize social media?
Sparse currently, needs to be more active
o Platteville: how much of social media will you do?
Most myself, but delegate
o Whitewater: buddy school communication?
Pair up schools in different regions, make sure to connect the subregional
directors as well
o CMU: plan on recruitment?
In bid under NACURH goals, survey current schools, lots of emails and
follow ups, develop policy changes
o UIS: shyness improvement?
Mostly shy when I don’t know someone and meet them, once I get to know
them, just one time, it becomes an issue. Working on it.
o Windsor: how to bring Canada?
First plan is to find ON-RCC and reach out to fill position. Strong
communication between all schools
o Western Michigan: Pillar incorporation?
Blog, programming, showcase and work with AD-NRHH
o Calumet: goals for RCCs?
Subregional, school, and RBD communication. Get them more involved.
Not sure of current roles
o UW-GB: move to exhaust
Ferris State seconds
o NIU: yield
o GVSU: yield
o Carbondale: subregional chair speaking rights?
Thinking of limits on when they will have speaking rights. Work with board,
need input without sway
o Ball State: Over focusing on issue?
Tend to focus on minute details instead of big picture.
o UWGB: Yield to redundancy
o Platteville: Skill suit in delegating and managing?
Current NCC, do delegate tasks to delegates attending conference and make
them join committees.
o Speakers list exhausted
Geoffrey Koester
Pro Con
Timeline “shyness”
Admitting to weaknesses “can be slow to react”
“focus on four pillars of NRHH” Experience at GLACURH
“find an Ontario RCC” “I’m not sure what their exact role is”
Presentation Bid
Answers “competent enough”
“best fit my skills”
Program input
Bid “low self-esteem”
“communication at all levels”
Social media initiatives
Increase affiliation
Discussion
o Carbondale: feels that they need to commend everyone, wanted to go in with an
open mind, we have decided to vote for Geoffrey
o Platteville: feels Andrew is best candidate, MI RCC may be a position for Melissa
o WIU: Feels that Geoffrey has the best timeline and goals, western is also big on
subregional conferences. Geoffrey focuses on NRHH. Board will be able to support
Geoffrey
o Guelph: Andrew’s experience helps further Canada with his experience and drive. He
acknowledges need for Guelph and Canada
o Oshkosh: feels like Geoffrey is best candidate. Feels that someone new would help
experience
o Milwaukee: torn between Andrew and Geoffrey. Melissa has no concrete plan.
Andrew has very large and expansive knowledge of subregions
o Western Michigan: feels that Geoffrey would be best candidate in this position
o MSU: commends all three candidates: torn between all three because they all did
wonderful, MSU wants to point out that if someone doesn’t know answer, they can
find the answer
o Calumet: loves Melissa’s energy, but lacks goals. Feels Geoffrey lacks knowledge, not
for director. Supports Andrew with current knowledge. Feels he is best candidate
o Purdue: commends all and supports Andrew, best person to bring GLACURH
forward
o Whitewater: while Geoffrey had great goals, Andrew has a better feel for the board
and conference experience
o BSU: both Andrew and Geoffrey could be director
o Eau Claire: Andrew has most experience with GLACURH, International Schools
and sub regions. Best plan for Canadian schools
o Ferris State: Calls question
River Falls objection
Has something to say
o CMU: commends all and feels that Andrew’s experience as RCC and AD-NRHH
makes him the best candidate for director
o UIS: supports Geoffrey, feels he is most prepared
o River Falls: experience and understanding are most important, Andrew has both.
Support Andrew
o University of Michigan: leans towards Andrew, Geoffrey and Melissa are good
o TIME
IUPUI exhaust
Ferris State Second
Calumet Objects
No new information
o Ferris retracts
o IUPUI retracts
Ferris State moves to extend discussion by 5 minutes
Second by Platteville
o DePaul: Calls the question
No objections
o Vote : Andrew Haugen Elected
Break for 5 minutes
Call to order at 9:19
Q & A: ADFA
o WIU
What has been your greatest accomplishment on the board this year
Being proactive to lower the regional debt this year. Lowered debt
significantly. Also updating the website
o Oakland
Something you would like to improve upon?
We don’t do well with finances and sponsorship. We need to begin
gaining alumni donations to support us financially. Another year
would also give him me more experience with non-profit finances.
o Indiana State
How do you plan to balance to position with ADFA and grad school?
Currently serves in many positions and is able to balance time
adequately. Would thrive and be able
o Illinois Wesleyan
What are some of the ideas you have with reaching the goal of regional
stability
Manuals and guides (transition guides). Also financial guides for
member schools. Trying to increase donations on the NACURH
level, but there may be better ways to utilize this funding.
o Western Illinois University
Are you staying at UIS for your masters?
Yes
o UW-Oshkosh
Will you be living on campus?
Yes. Hopefully in the same apartment so he doesn’t have to move.
Jacob Crosetto
Pro Con
Continuity Presentation
Experience Workload
“I feel 100% able to take on this position”
Bid
Alumni
Discussion:
o DePaul University
Has never seen more enthusiasm from ADFA candidates. We have 100%
confidence that he will excel in another term.
o MSU
Michigan State University would like to echo DePaul. We also thank him for
his timely response in emails and his financial updates.
o Illinois Wesleyan
Calls the question
Vote: Jacob Crosetto Elected
AD-NRHH Election
o Tyler Bradley
o Q&A:
Platteville: Raising awareness of trophy and diversifying committee?
Updates through newsletters
Whitewater: New time commitments?
Diversity and Culture board, Valley Vanguard as staff writer,
transitioning Editor-In-Chief, as well as RHA and NRHH
Guelph: how to encourage international affiliates for NRHH?
Using examples of how and why other schools joined
Ferris: yield
Ball State: yield
How to work with subregional NRHH groups?
Not entirely sure how this occurs, but willing to learn
U of Mich: how would you help someone who is struggling with own
NRHH?
Engagement between directorship and chapter to ensure everyone
has something to get out of it?
Purdue: how you plan to establish NRHH?
Online Chats, through reading of constitutions
CMU: plan to increase diversity on committee?
Approaching individuals
TIME
Ferris State moves to exhaust
Whitewater seconds
CMU answer continued: have background to get certain individuals
involved
SIU-C: How can we be sure that you won’t be overwhelmed?
To-do list, timeline, assess and reassess goals
Indiana State: experience leading a boardroom?
Always learning more and more, expect people to help guide him and
teach
IUPUI yields
NIU yields
WIU: plan to incorporate other pillars?
Promote service projects
Stout: turnaround time on emails?
24 hours, hopefully faster
Indiana State yields
Tyler Bradley
Pro Con
“recognition element” “umm”
Diamond days newsletter Pillars
“big fan of calendars and to-do lists” “representeded”
Diversify OTM committee “what was the other one”
Pie Charts Presentation
Bid “I didn’t know that existed until today”
“celebrate 50th anniversary of NRHH” Answers
Shorter interactive guides Time commitment
On campus leadership “feel fairly confident”
Less outside involvement next year “hopefully”
“communication with AD-NRHHs from other regions”
“favorite thing about NRHH”
Knowledge of parli pro
Matt Dela Cruz
Q&A
o Whitewater: time commitments?
Full time student with commitments in attending weekly RHA and NRHH
Meetings
o Purdue: plans for supporting subregional NRHH orgs?
As unique as subregions are to GLACURH, would love to work with moving
away from, but still willing to work with them
o U of Mich: How would you assist NRHH chapters?
Skype in, call upon prominent NRHH chapters in the region
o WIU: plan for incorporating pillars?
Service: RCC of philanthropy, Recognition: quality OTMs and newsletters,
Scholastics: would want to put academic tips and testimonials, Leadership:
creation of NRHH chapters
o Ball State: plan to initiate outreach to chapters?
See who has been affiliated in the past and personally reach out to schools
o CMU: Are you aware MARHH is dissolving and plans to help them?
Not aware
TIME
o Ferris State moves to exhaust
Marquette seconds
Continued: not aware, but since Michigan is a subregion of GLACURH,
work to strengthen
o MSU yields
o NIU yields
o Stout: plan to reach out to Canadian school?
Use of current network and reaching out to students?
o UWGB: define stronger chapters vs. ones that need improvement
Leave it to discretion of chapter to decide if they are a strong resource
o Oshkosh yields
o Guelph yields
o Stout: TAT for emails?
2 hours
Matt Dela Cruz
Pro Con
Presentation Presentation
Previous experiences Bid
Newsletters Answers
Initiative Subregional support
Pillars “umm probably”
“we’re all in this together”
“I want to be a resource” “that’s a great questions”
Support for ON schools
“talk to current NAN”
“big brother/big sister program”
Discussion
o MSU: does not have an NRHH, found it interesting about what NRHH does, in
strong support of Matt, has a lot of passion, made MSU aware of what NRHH
means, had a better outline
o UWGB: commends recognition and newsletter
o Ball State: Matt’s directory is imperative to NRHH
o CMU: in full support of Matt
o Platteville: Matt has potential, but supports Tyler based on goals
o Guelph: Matt can provide most resource to ON
o Purdue: Tyler focusing on bringing new chapters and Matt is focused on existing,
would like to see more regional support and feels that Matt would assist more
o NIU: Matt’s goals and initiatives make him the best candidate
o Ferris State calls question
Vote: Matt Dela Cruz
Move to Grove for 5 minutes
o Second by Platteville
Called to order: 11:00
Presentations
Call to order at 8:00 a.m. 3/8/14
Roll Call
UIC moves to bring MML to the floor
o Second by Platteville
Proponent speech
o La Crosse moves to waive
Ferris State seconds
o Q&A:
o CMU moves to end
River Falls seconds
No objections
o Discussion:
o Green Bay calls question
Vote: 37-0-0
IUPUI brings MMP to floor
o NIU Seconds
o MSU moves to waive the readings
2nd by CMU
o Proponent speech by Jacob Crosetto
o Q&A
WIU: Where is it coming from? Which year?
FY15, I’ll order it April 1. The money comes from our tech savings
fund.
Indiana State: How long has the current laptop been in use?
4 years.
IUPUI: Are these the only programs you will need?
Yes, the rest of what we do is through Google Drive. With Adobe
Acrobat, it’s needed for finance files.
Whitewater: Were there any thoughts of buying insurance?
Typically we get the AppleCare for the year. If it’s something you
would like to see, then that’s something we can do. It’s never really
needed since we stick to the 4 year cycle and it can be pretty pricey.
DePaul moves to end Q&A
2nd by Marquette
Withdrawn
UW Oshkosh: Is Microsoft Office the permanent or four year one?
Permanent.
UW Oshkosh: Will transfer to the next laptop as well?
We typically just repurchase Office, since after four years there have
been substantial updates requiring us to do so.
IUPUI: Will this be Microsoft 2013?
Yes we will also be looking at Microsoft 360.
MSU moves to end Q&A
2nd by Ball State
o Discussion
IUPUI calls the question
No Objection
Vote: 37-0-0
o Grand Valley moves MMR to floor
Eau Claire seconded
o Proponent
o Oakland moves to waive
Green Bay seconds
o Q&A:
o WIU: is your bid penalized or DQ’d?
No, just for the archiving
o Marquette: will current bids change?
No, this just makes it easier to correctly file the archive bid
o Indiana State yield
o Carbondale: side or slide?
Side
o U of Mich: moves to end
Windsor second
o Discussion:
o Indiana State feels that this could possibly throw out bid
o WIU: cannot support since it could DQ bid, believes it needs more clarification
o Milwaukee: extremely helpful to bid writers, just clarifies how to save things;
promotes real word experience
o UIC echoes WIU, feels that it needs to be more clear, if a bid would be DQ’d
because of the title, we would like that in there
o Calumet: this piece is necessary and that when creating bids, it doesn’t take that
much effort
o IUPUI: moves to recognize amendment
Evansville seconds
Milwaukee objects
Retracts
Proponent speech: real world experience and we need to have things are
correct, great exercise for us. Having the correct file name will assist us
Q&A:
Oakland: effective next year?
Not needed, we should already be practicing this.
Milwaukee: love the idea of real world experience, but would you consider
RBD feedback time?
Redundant
ISU moves to end
BSU seconds
Discussion:
Marquette: not in favor, should not be DQ based on, this regulation makes it
harder for schools to bid
Platteville: not in favor, why specify?
WMU: we are in favor, this real world experience is practical and will
improve filing
NIU: it isn’t a hard thing to change file, but not sure if bid should be DQ’d
ISU: echoes NIU, with it being in gov docs, it is picky
Guelph yield
CMU: motion to end discussion
Second by Green Bay
Calumet objects
o Would like to add
o CMU retracts
o Green Bay retracts
Eau Claire: while this will help streamline, it shouldn’t disqualify you because
of the work
Oakland yield
Evansville: RBD can interpret constitution
UIC: would like to remind everyone that there is a piece a legislation that
clears up constitutionality and it would not automatically DQ
Stevens Point: too harsh
DePaul: is it possible to wait until MMO is brought to floor?
After amendment
MSU: feels that if we submit bid and then get warning, you should be able to
change it
Calumet: further clarifies, but is restricting
Carbondale: yield
WMU: point out that if there is no penalty, then why are we going this
WIU calls question
No objections
Vote on amendment: motion fails
o MSU moves to table this piece of legislation until after MMO
Second by Guelph
No objections
Tabled
MMS
o DePaul moves to bring MMS to floor
GVSU seconds
o ISU moves to waive the reading
2nd by UW Stout
o Proponent Speech
o Q&A
Milwaukee moves to end Q&A
2nd by Western Michigan
Withdrawn
UW Oshkosh: What if your term if office at your institution is not in line
with this timeline? Would my position not count for this?
It means your content being a CC would be from when you started
until No Frills. We’re open to an amendment to make it NACURH
to NACURH. We did it for No Frills though because you wouldn’t
be serving until NACURH typically and couldn’t include content
from there.
Marquette: Is it the current CC or can you bid on the previous CC, say the
person we are taking over for?
You can bid for the CC you are taking over for. But you could also
be put up as a nominee. The way it was worded before it sounded
like the past two CCs, not including you, instead of including you and
your predecessor.
MSU moves to end Q&A
2nd by Oakland
Withdrawn
Platteville: Since some of us having incomings now, that includes some prior
CC information, would that include NCC info No Frills to NACURH 2014
for this year?
You could not include that information.
WIU: For NACURH, could we bid for the CC who served up until No
Frills?
Yes
CMU: Would the only regional part you would put on your bid be the
GLACURH conference? Because you don’t have No Frills or NACURH
meetings?
You could put on other involvement, such as committees and things
you’ve done in NACURH that aren’t necessarily business meetings.
They can also put anticipated attendance at No Frills.
UMichigan moves to end Q&A
2nd by UW Green Bay
Withdrawn
Guelph: How would it work if we had it as No Frills to No Frills?
Terms usually end at NACURH, so it includes most terms.
Oshkosh: Do you bid for it at GLACURH or No Frills?
Here.
o Oshkosh: If the point is to take this to NACURH, then you
can’t go for NACURH things?
You are able to adjust your bid between now and the
NACURH deadline. And it will still fit in your term.
If your constitution has a NACURH to NACURH
term, then you’re fine.
MSU moves to end Q&A
2nd by UIC
No Objections
o Discussion
Marquette: We are not in favor. We should be recognizing past CCs for the
hard work they did over the past year. You cannot include NACURH
preparation in the bid and that is not fair.
Indiana State moves to recognize the amendment to add to section 5a,
“Terms of office for award purposes shall be from the close of business at
the previous No Frills
2nd by Guelph
Proponent Speech
Q&A
o IUPUI: Is there a reason why you put the close of business at No
Frills?
I did it because that’s how it was previously worded.
o MSU moves to end Q&A
2nd by UW Stevens Point
No objections
Discussion
o Guelph: We fully support this. We believe this in inclusive to all
terms.
o Platteville moves to amend the amendment to read “to the start
of business at the previous No Frills conference”
2nd by Guelph
Proponent Speech
Q&A
Purdue-Calumet moves to end Q&A
o 2nd by IUPUI
Discussion
Purdue calls the question
o No objections
Vote: 37-0-0
Discussion on the amendment continued
o Indiana State calls the question
No objections
Vote: 34-3-0
o Discussion on MMS continued
Milwaukee: We are in full support of this legislation. It’s evident by only 2
bids having been submitted in the past few years that something was wrong.
It’s easier to write a bid about someone you know.
Illinois Wesleyan calls the question
No objections
o Vote: 34-3-0
MMT to the floor by Green Bay
o Second by BSU
o No objections
Proponent speech
DePaul moves to waive reading
Second by Ferris State
o Q&A
o Calumet: how long is transfer status?
First year on campus, after they move off the transfer floor
o GVSU: Wouldn’t the requirements take up page limit?
Cover page doesn’t count, table of contents can be condensed, feel that 2
other paged would be fine
o IWU: move to end
Second by Ferris State
Marquette objects
Withdrawn
o Marquette: did previous transfer year count?
Could be clarified
o ISU: move to end
River Falls second
o Discussion
o Calumet: likes piece, but worried about restricted bids with page number
o Stevens Point: likes content, worried about page number, suggests 6
o ISU: friendly amendment to first year
Retracts
o Purdue: yield
o Platteville yield
o Wesleyan: question called
Oshkosh retracts
o CMU: amendment
Second by DePaul
No objections
o Q&A:
o U of Mich moves to end
Ferris State seconds
o Discussion: Guelph yields
o River Falls calls question
Oshkosh objects
o Oshkosh: point out that new amendment does not match NACURH level, would
like to keep this simple and show you can move on
o UIC: would like to point out that we have our own governing documents for a
reason, this is not necessary
o DePaul: calls the question
ISU: object
o ISU: point out from amendment goes from 4 to 6
o Stevens Point: feels it is easier to increase to 6 pages
o Western Michigan: in favor, you can still add more for NACURH level
o Green Bay yield
o Carbondale: calls question
No objections
o Vote: 35-1-1
o Discussion:
o Calumet: feels that keeping it at 8 would be best, we need to make it 8, gives option
while allowing
o U of Michigan:
No objections
o Vote: 31-5-1
o Recess for 10 minutes
UIC
NIU seconds
o Call to order at 10:15
o GLACURH 2014 Host
o Indiana State
o Presentation
o Q&A
o Stout: plan to incorporate polar plunge?
Right before banquet, then will have time to change
o Oakland: delegation cap?
10 people, including advisors
o Whitewater:
Also include CCs?
Yes
o UIS: Yield
o NIU: Date?
Hulman center, banquet, and dance
o Marquette: Alternates?
Yes
o Windsor: access to Wi-Fi?
Access and free
o Oshkosh: Working at sound for opening?
Elevated seating and curtains to block sound
o Stevens Point: Dietary needs?
Registration forms, gluten free, allergies
o IUPUI: Delegate fee?
6200 sponsorship, 8 dollars less than bid, 118
o WIU: ADA accessible?
Completely, ramp, sidewalks, elevators
o Milwaukee: 1st to 26th registration?
Will have until the 26th
But, will have if needed
o Calumet: Plan on using guidebook?
Yes, complete descriptions, schedule, programming
Program ratings?
No
o Stout: Paper copies?
Yes, printing sponsorship
o Is 118/delegate advisors?
No
o IUPUI: Advisors forced to have single?
No
o Carbondale: yields
o Platteville: boardroom close to delegation?
Different floors, in college of business, separate and blocked off
o Inclusive housing?
Gender inclusive, most comfortable
o UIC: working with CCs on registration?
As soon as possible
o Oshkosh yield
o Carbondale moves to end Q&A
Second by Ferris State
Indiana State
Purdue Presentation
Q&A
Pro Con
Number of programming sessions Delegate Cap
Philanthropy Registration
Answers Date
Presentation “wear costumes to boardroom”
Polar plunge
“wear costumes to boardroom” Polar Plunge
Theme Hotel distance
Inclusive housing Different hotels
“CC survey before registration process”
Guidebook Program registration
Experience
Boardroom
Ability to register alternates
MSU: reconsider registration date?
o This could be extended from Oct 10
Marquette: secure the 20,000?
o Yes, feeling more like 30,000
Stevens Point: Dietary concerns?
o Vegan, allergies, and vegetarian
UIC: cap include advisors and CCs?
o No
Carbondale: cap on first come first serve?
o 10 delegates/school
Ferris State: alternate?
o Ghost registration, yes
Windsor: blood donation, how do you intend to allow?
o All going to American Red Cross, water could be donated to relief and firefighters.
Eau Claire: Monetary donations?
o Yes
La Crosse: Gender inclusive?
o Yes
Stout: registration dates?
o September 29
Green Bay: plan for sick after donating blood?
o Encourage them to steer philanthropy towards water, get special help
CMU: vacant staff position?
o All filled, awesome team
Windsor: accommodate Canadians?
o All hotels have Wi-Fi and Purdue
NIU: housing is in 2 of 3 hotels?
o Capacity is in demand, holds are placed, but contracts are not signed. We have 3
options
Calumet: transportation for ADA?
o Of course, will address
o Also having guided tours
UIUC: Guidebook and paper copies?
o Yes and yes
CMU: religious preference meals?
o Should be able to, needs to check
St. Francis: 10,000 dollars lower by what?
o Lowered to 130
DePaul: 4,000 for keynote?
o Verify to know better, estimated it high
NIU: Confused on delegate cap?
o 10 delegates, ghost registration
Ferris state moves to extend by 5 minutes
o Whitewater
NIU continued:
o Need to figure out schools with less than ten, hopefully 2-3
Stout: late registration fee:
o Per delegate
ISU: delegate cap CCs and Delegates?
o 2 advisors, 2 CCs
Guelph: almost certain for sponsorship, but back up plan?
o Have pitched high on prices, but looking at small projections, but no way to make
sure
Platteville: location for monster ball?
o Ross
UIUC: cost for breakfast?
o Difference in cost of hotels made up for price, so breakfast is included
Whitewater: potential speakers?
o Going into “hyper drive” to get them
Stout: started speaking to sponsors?
o Yes
Oshkosh: moves to extend by 5 minutes
o Second by CMU
Oshkosh: ghost gender? And male and female together?
o Accommodate for gender neutral, surveying
Carbondale: Keynote speaker back up?
o Purdue has 24 astronauts to contact
Ferris State moves to end
o Marquette seconds
Pro Con
“Halloween Zumba” Answers
Credit card payments Inconsistency between bid/presentation
“passing the leadership torch” Registration timeline
Keynote speakers Budget
Programming sessions Presentation
“display on a stick” Inclusivity
Fourth-ranked food Keynote speakers
Philanthropy Philanthropy
Advisor programs Date
Closing ceremonies Cost
Delegation cap Dietary accommodations
Accommodations for those who fly Delegation cap
Tunnels Alternate policy
Entertainment “state breakout”
CC programs Sponsorships
Collaboration with organizations Distance
Guidebook Number of programs
Inclusivity Beacon display
Multiple hotels
Virtual banner Two-fold theme
Two-fold theme Virtual banner
Dressing up “American Red Cross”
“you can donate water” Bid
Security
Opening ceremonies
Monetary donations
Discussion of both:
DePaul: commend both schools, in full support of ISU, this is exactly what our school needs
for GLACURH. We would be penalized if Purdue is selected
SVSU: Indiana state is stronger option
Ferris State: yield
WMU: point out Purdue many questions that we did not ask ISU, feels that we need to ask
Indiana State
CMU: commend both teams, Indiana State is the better candidate
CMU: echoes CMU NRHH, philanthropy is less problematic, in full support
BSU: at this point ISU is much more prepared through low cost and programming options
NCC: Indiana state offers best due to cost, philanthropy
Guelph Yields
MSU: both did fabulous, ISU did best. MSU would like to point out, as a host, that the hotel
is not a huge situation
WIU: ISU is better candidate, confident in answers and was very though out. Purdue’s
answers did not make sense
U of Mich: call the question
o Windsor objects
Windsor: more consideration to ISU
o NIU: calls question
Vote: ISU selected
NACURH 2014 Presentation
Lunch
Subregional Breakout
Call to order at 2:48
Roll Call
Presentations
No Frills 2014 Presentation
o Q&A
o Green Bay: is the date negotiable?
We understand and that just happens to fall, in order to maximize the
number, it was the date that worked
o IUPUI: estimated sponsorship?
Goal was to get cost around 80 dollars per delegate
o Guelph yields
o UIS: Clickers?
Yes, most up to date with technology and monitors. Charging stations, TVs,
monitors
o CMU: is date set in stone?
Yield to CC
IWU: set in stone from my understanding. If huge issue, we can try
to work it out, but pretty set in stone
o Whitewater: gender inclusive housing?
Most definitely
o Eau Claire yields
o WMU: transportation costs?
No
o NIU yields
o Stout: Accessibility?
Ramps and elevators all over including the hotel and campus
o NIU: is there another option for philanthropy?
Would like to look into it, update at GLACURH
o Marquette: gluten free?
Chefs that make the food and will definitely accommodate
o CMU Yields
o Windsor yields
o Ferris State: registration format?
Online, through survey that will be forwarded to email regardless of who is
in charge and will work to answer questions
o Oshkosh: why do you need to specify gender?
The way the form is set up
o ISU: moves to end
Second by Oakland
No Objections
IWU
Pro Con
Cost of delegation Dates
Answers Theme
Budget Attendance
Shuttles “set in stone”
Facilities
Sponsorships
Bid
Discussion:
Oakland: cannot support due to dates
Whitewater: no frills during OPE forces people to choose between position and future
Oshkosh: cannot travel outside the state without an advisor
Ferris State: liked costs of conference, in full support
Platteville: would like to hear incoming board’s responses as to if they are going to OPE?
o Carbondale: plans on going
o Christina Knowlton is going
o Andrew Haugen: planning on attending
Ferris state moves to extend discussion
o Second by Marquette
DePaul moves to extend by 10 minutes
o Stout seconds
Discussion
o Platteville yields
o Carbondale: point of information, can date change after selection?
They don’t have to change the date
o EIU yields
o SVSU: yields
o MSU: yields
o Marquette: moves to caucus with Advisor for 5 minutes
Calumet seconds
UIC objects
UIC retracts
o EIU: Point of Information
How many schools can an advisor proxy for?
No set, usually 1
o WMU: feels that we are not in support and Oshkosh will not be supported.
o Stout: looking at incoming CCs, not current, may not be affected
o U of Michigan: yield
o Guelph: support bid based on strong preparedness, would benefit if this was voted
no and dates were assessed
o Stevens Point: regarding dates and is repetitive
o WIU: calls the question
No objections
o Vote: No Confidence
o WMU moves to recess for 5 minutes
Second by Ferris State
Call to order: 4:47
ART Coordinator Elections
o Bill Lenarz
Q&A
IUPUI: adding resources to make assist advisors, what specifically?
o Christina Aichele, plethora of resources to assist in growth
and would really like to bring all of this together into one
spot
MSU: move to end Q&A
o Second by Ferris
o Carbondale objects
o Retracts
Carbondale: biggest challenge next year
o Bringing new ART curriculum to website and bringing it to
GLACURH
Carbondale: Why from cop to advisor?
o RA for three years at Iowa State, went to grad school,
decided to be a cop, got tired of carrying a gun, looked back
and became a hall director and had an opportunity to advise
RHA and NRHH and work with 18, 19, 20 year olds. Very
fortunate to advise at River Falls
Ferris: Move to end
o Oakland second
Bill Lenarz
Pro Con
Serving student leaders
Goals
“supplement regional board” GLACURH experience
Knowledge of new ART program Presentation
Presentation Master ART Experience
Real, real world experience
Personal mentor
Professional experience Bid
Tracking system
“fiercely loyal”
“helping 18, 19, 20 year olds figure out life” Professional experience
Networking
Online initiative
“develop different training opportunities”
Justin Schuch
o Q&A
Carbondale: biggest challenge?
Realistic in amount of work, making sure records are kept up to date,
needed to focus on new curriculum.
Carbondale: average email time?
Very quickly, usually within minutes
Oakland: biggest area of improvement
Relying on email and working through Gold
CMU: comfortable in front of big groups?
Very comfortable, want to convey information
BSU: how to help advisors help us?
Committee has done great job. Currently position doesn’t reach out,
but would love to
Carbondale: timeline in bid, elaborate goals?
Make sure goals compliment themselves, education is very important
and advisors need to receive communication post-NACURH and
pre-NACURH
Ferris State moves to end
SVSU seconds
Justin Schuch
Pro Con
Presentation
GLACUHO Experience ART Experience
Answers Bid
Knowledge of constitution
Timeline
Bid
ART Coordinator Election Continued
o Discussion
IUPUI: feels that both are qualified, but Justin is the best candidate. He had
GLACURH experience and that is important
Platteville: Move to caucus for 3 minutes
Second by NIU
No objections
U of Mich: Justin’s experience makes him the best candidate (page 4)
WMU: commend both, fully support Bill and his efforts are support of student,
lack of experience shows ability to produce
Windsor: Calls question
Grand Valley objects
ISU: both are qualified, regional experience is useful
GVSU: Bill will bring experience from outside, Bill can bring in valuable
information
BSU: Justin is best for the position
SVSU: experience isn’t always necessary, but supports Justin
IWU: calls question
No objection
o Vote: Justin Schuch Selected
FY 15 Budget Presentation
o Proponent Speech
o Q&A
MSU moves to end Q&A
2nd UW Green Bay
Withdrawn
IUPUI: On the second sheet of the budget…
It’s not correct. That’s why I added the CAD column on the first sheet.
Ferris State moves to end Q&A
2nd by UI Springfield
No objections
o Discussion
DePaul calls the question
No objections
o Vote: 38-0-0
IUPUI moves to recess until after dinner
o 2nd by Ferris State
o No objections
Call to Order at 7:19 PM EST
o Strategic Plan
o Legislation
UIC moves to bring MMM to floor
o GVSU Seconds
Proponent Speech
La Crosse moves to waive reading
o Purdue seconds
Q&A
o Purdue: in addition to publishing is this going on the site?
Yes
o CMU: yields
o UIC: Yield
o Marquette: clarify records?
Records in hard drive
o ISU: moves to end
Oakland seconds
Discussion
o Oshkosh moves to end
o Guelph seconds
CONSENT
Platteville moves to bring MMO to the floor
o BSU Seconds
o IUPUI moves to waive the readings
2nd by Stevens Point
o Proponent Speech
o Q&A
Indiana State: Does the 48 hours include the time it takes for the RBD to get
back to the bid submitter? How long will that take? Will that affect the 48 hours?
It says no less than 48 hours so we would probably do the policy check
Wednesday through Friday, with the revised bids due on the Tuesday.
This is according to the typical Wednesday deadline.
Marquette: What does the “publish to the region” mean?
It’s saying at this time, so the TIME will published, not the bid.
Ferris State moves to end Q&A
2nd by Purdue University
No objections
o Discussion
GVSU moves to end discussion
2nd by SVSU
No objections
o Vote: 38-0-0
Guelph moves to bring MMV to the floor
o 2nd by Stout
o UW Green Bay moves to waive the reading
2nd by Eastern Illinois
o Proponent Speech
o Q&A
Indiana State moves to end Q&A
2nd by Oakland
o Discussion
GVSU moves to end discussion
2nd by WMU
o Vote: 37-1-0
Oakland moves to bring MMX to the floor
o 2nd by Eastern Illinois
o MSU moves to waive the reading
2nd by UW Eau Claire
o Proponent Speech
o Q&A
Windsor: Is the authorization happening by the ADFA or is the ADFA
authorized to rent a car?
Authorization by the ADFA.
SIU: For Illinois you have to be 25, how will that affect the process?
I checked into it mainly with Enterprise and they said it’s now 21 in
Illinois.
CA ADNRHH: Frequently Avis & Enterprise have contracts, which
allow students to use rentals as low as 18 if it’s for university business.
UW Green Bay: Why not university vehicles?
In certain states there are trainings that have to be done. Most
universities require you to be staff. They’re generally a lot more expensive
than rental cars. It’s more feasible to do rentals.
IUPUI: Where does this come out of the budget and how much would you want
to spend on average?
I wouldn’t know on average. It would come out of travel and only if it
needed to be done.
Ferris State moves to end Q&A
2nd by Evansville
o Discussion
North Central College moves to end discussion
2nd by UW River Falls
o Vote: 36-2-0
Guelph moves to bring MMR to the floor
o 2nd by Green By
o moves to waive the readings
2nd by
Discussion on MMR
o UIC feels that with passing MMO, this allows for time to be considered by the bid
writer. This should be plenty of time
o Calumet: moves to end
Evansville second
Vote 33-4-1
Springfield moves to bring MMQ to the floor
o Marquette seconds
Windsor moves to waive reading
o NIU seconds
Proponent
Q&A
o Windsor: what happens if not?
Institutions are responsible
o Western Michigan moves to end
Second by Purdue
o CONSENT
Vote: 38-0-0
o SVSU moves to bring MMU to the floor
Second by Whitewater
o Move to waive the reading by La Crosse
Second by Carbondale
o Proponent
o Q&A
BSU: portrait or landscape?
Up to the interpretation of RBD.
Ferris State: move to end
Eau Claire seconds
Purdue objects
Withdrawn
Elaborate on print?
Not just a blank page
How do you see this as a hindrance?
Never seen it
POI CMU: easy to change
Purdue: this applies to all bids?
Yes
Guelph moves to end Q&A
Green Bay seconds
o Discussion
Purdue calls questions
No objections
o Vote: 33-5-0
Western Michigan moves to bring MMW
o UIUC seconds
Carbondale moves to waive reading
o Second by Stout
Proponent
Q&A
o DePaul: moves to end
UIC seconds
Marquette objects
Withdrawn
o Marquette: are putting these as required, putting both of future?
As long as you have potential, it should be fine
o River Falls: moves to end
EIU seconds
Windsor objects
Withdrawn
o Windsor: areas of improvement or weaknesses
Both
o Oshkosh: academic standing?
Already in requirements
o CMU: would this be required in bid and presentation?
Bid
o Platteville: moves to end
Second by GVSU
o Discussion
o WIU: doesn’t support this piece, this should be covered in the presentation. This is a
common question, but should be up to bid writer
o GVSU: yield
o UIC: yield
o U of Mich: calls the question
ISU objects
o ISU: is in support, but for future reference it may be beneficial to look into increasing
page numbers in future
o Calumet: yield
o BSU: in support, requires people to give you what you ask for and gives more time to
ask better relevant questions
o Ferris: calls questions
Objection by Oshkosh
o Osh Kosh: good idea to have clear example prior to being on the spot
o Oakland yields
o IUPUI calls the question
Vote: 31-7-0
o NIU moves to grove for 5 minutes
Second by Ferris
o Call to order at 8:40
o AAFN
Jenna Decker by DePaul
Jenna is has been an asset to the organization. She started off as a CC.
Sub-region president. Prepared her to be the NCC she is today. Taken
the beliefs and integrated them into the region
Beck Wintringer – Whitewater
Met Becky as a delegate. She brought the energy to the conference. She
became a CC and won NCC of the Year. We should admire this
accomplishment. She has been a huge resource for our school and the
region.
Tyler Noragon (IUPUI)
Known Tyler for 3 years and he is very enthusiastic and personable. He
wanted to get his university to come to support their first NRHH
induction. We really support him
Kate Tessier (CMU)
She is from CMU and is passionate and energetic. She has been on RHA
for quite some time and served in many roles. She has received the 4-year
service pin. She pushed for more OTMs and won the travel trophy for
’13. She is the reason why he ran for his position.
Jacob Crosetto (River Falls)
Elected for a second term for ADFA and takes excellent minutes. His
abilities have really impressed him at the past two conferences. Has not
doubt that he will do even greater.
Karlee Keiper (GVSU)
Since she was a freshman she has been very involved in RHA. She has
served in two roles there. She has made herself available to us. She was
the one that served as a proxy and transitioned the current NCC into his
role. She was there to help and encourage the rest of the RHA to attend
GLACURH. She has love for the region
Andrew Haugen (Stevens Point)
He was WI RCC, and AD-NRHH, NCC, and now Director-elect. He
should be given this award, as he has a lot of dedication to the
organization. He has been there for all of us. He also ran NRHH board
room efficiently.
Lindsey Spencer (ISU)
She has served as RCC and served as NCC. She remained helpful
throughout both positions. She was a great resource and is a true friend
of NACURH.
Discussion:
Purdue Calumet
o PC loves everyone. Wants to remind everyone that everyone on
the list is close to someone’s heart.
WIU
o Three people stick out. Jenna Decker received an award after
being an NCC for a year and now serves on the regional and
national level. Lindsey is deserving because she displays passion.
Andrew has a very quick response time and is very supportive.
He takes the time to say hi and converse when passing.
IUPUI
o Lindsey is the best on the list. She helped start the NRHH
chapter at IUPUI. She is the current IN RCC and she is an
incredible leader. She is there for you to answer questions. She
has been a personal mentor to me and never discouraged him.
Lindsey is a great leader and hopefully moving on to be a RA
next year.
IUPUI NRHH
o Echoes IUPUI. She has started the philanthropy challenge and
started the president’s chat.
Green Bay NRHH
o I believe Andrew is a good leader. He is extremely dedicated at
conferences. He has been extremely helpful to NRHH in general
University of Michigan
o I have had the privileged of working with Kate for quite some
time. On the state level she became a chair. In NACURH she is
very active with NRHH. She can make people laugh.
Indiana State
o Tyler was NCC at the same time Lindsey was. He was extremely
helpful to CCs and NRHH CCs. He has been involved for at
least 3 years and is a friend of NACURH.
Western Michigan
o Supports Kate. She was very representative at the winter business
meeting and we would like to see him receive this honor.
Central MI
o All of these candidates are extremely passionate. Kate stands out.
She is very involved on campus. She is a RA. She is constantly
networking. She is compassionate and ‘
Whitewater NRHH
o Becky has done well as a RCC. She has done with WURHA as
well. She created the CC tips for conferences – which were
extremely helpful. Becky is one of the best candidates for this
honor.
Purdue
o When I think about GLACURH and NACURH I think of Tyler.
I look forward to seeing him when I come to conferences.
Grand Valley State
o Jenna, Kate, and Karlee. Kate embodies the principles of the
organization. Jenna has been really encouraging. Karlee has been
extremely helpful on campus. She has been very energetic and
cares about the organization a lot.
UIC
o While it is great to hear a lot on everyone, but UIC feels that
Jenna, Becky, Andrew, and Jacob are very deserving of this
award.
DePaul
o Jacob was the NF Chair for 2012. That was a great responsibility
for someone to take on themselves and wants to commend him
on that effort.
Saginaw Valley
o As a conference chair, he has been an extremely helpful resource.
He sat down with the conference staff to help them through the
finance chair resignation. He has done great things for the
organization and really deserves this honor.
Saginaw Valley NRHH
o We have a lot of great candidates, but would like to highlight
Andrew Haugen. Made him feel that GLACURH was his home
and has remained helpful and willing to lend an ear. He really
cares about this organization.
River Falls
o Becky, Jacob, and Andrew. Becky has been the one I have gone
to for answers to questions. She has remained helpful and
friendly. Jacob has got it together pretty much. For Andrew, we
yield to redundancy.
Evansville
o Echo what Purdue said about Tyler. Met him last night and can
see his passion clearly.
Ball State
o Tyler has a huge passion for GLACURH. He has been a huge
help in getting me into this position and helping with transition.
As NRHH president he has remained passionate.
Whitewater RHA
o Jacob and Andrew have a distinct advantage of being represented
on next year’s RBD. Please keep in mind that other candidates do
not have that luxury.
Carbondale NRHH
o Moved to narrow the list to top five
o University of Illinois Chicago Seconded
o Purdue Calumet objected
o Illinois Chicago did not retract their second
Vote 24-13-1to narrow
Top Five
Jenna Decker
Becky Wintringer
Andrew Haugen
Jacob Crosetto
Lindsey Spencer
Discussion:
o UIC NRHH
Being the ADFA he deals with the financial side of
GLACURH. His services to NACURH are much
underrated. His standards were set high for himself and
for future leaders.
o Marquette
Becky and Andrew have gone above and beyond their
duties. Becky has helped with bidding for all positions.
Andrew has been there as a resource. Though we realize
that Andrew will return next year, we still feel that he
should be inducted now.
o Indiana State
Jacob and Andrew will be able to become inducted next
year. The other three candidates are highly qualified so
that should be taken into consideration.
o University of Michigan
Jacob has a very strong commitment to GLACURH.
Grad school, the MBA program, is very difficult. This
shows that he is extremely committed.
o Oshkosh
Feels that Jacob and Lindsey are equal in their
accomplishments. From the WURHA breakout, we may
not have had the same outcome without Lindsey’s insight
and leadership. She facilitated a great discussion.
o Purdue NRHH
Feels that Jenna, Becky and Lindsey have been dedicated
to GLACURH for 4 years. They represent 3 out of five
sub-regions in GLACURH
o Purdue Calumet
We really hope that the fifth person left out will be
nominated by their host affiliation and dues paid. Lindsey
embodies the spirit, love, and passion. It inspires us to
follow in their footsteps (Becky and Lindsey)
o WIU
In favor of Jenna, Becky, and Lindsey.
o DePaul
In favor of Jacob, Becky, Andrew, Jenna.
o Platteville
Jenna, Becky, Jacob, and Lindsey. Jenna is a great director
and has gone above and beyond. Becky goes the extra
mile because she cares. Jacob is deserving because of his
outstanding financial work. Lindsey led the WURHA
boardroom very well. Andrew is great, but has more
room to grow and can be honored next year.
o NIU
Echo’s previous comments. Lindsey has a lot of
enthusiasm and cares about the organization.
o Windsor
Jenna, Jacob and Andrew were very supportive in the
Ontario breakout
o Indiana State
Moved to select to the top four
UIUC seconded.
Oshkosh objected.
Should vote on who to eliminate
UIUC retracted
Indiana State did not retract their motion
CMU seconded
Oshkosh withdrew their objection
o Top Four and AAFN Selections:
Jacob Crosetto
Becky Wintringer
Jenna Decker
Lindsey Spencer
o Website Update
Jacob, Kevin, and Abbas
o Approval of GLACURH 2013 Minutes
Motion by Whitewater
Seconded by NIU
No Objections
o Motion to adjourn by Saginaw Valley State University at 10:46 p.m.
Second by Eau Claire
