No. 18-9563 (and other cases listed inside cover) IN THE ... · No. 18-9563 (and other cases listed inside cover) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT . S

No. 18-9563 (and other cases listed inside cover) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

SPRINT CORPORATION, Petitioner,

CITY OF NEW YORK, Intervenor - Petitioner,

v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents,

CITY OF BOWIE, MARYLAND, et al., Intervenors - Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission

RESPONDENTS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO TRANSFER

Makan Delrahim Assistant Attorney General

Robert B. Nicholson Adam D. Chandler

Attorneys U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20530

Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. General Counsel

David M. Gossett Deputy General Counsel

Jacob M. Lewis Associate General Counsel

Scott M. Noveck Counsel

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 (202) 418-1740 [email protected]

Appellate Case: 18-9563 Document: 010110099054 Date Filed: 12/17/2018 Page: 1

[Caption Continued from Front Cover]

No. 18-9566

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Petitioner,

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents, THE CITY OF SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Intervenors - Respondents.

No. 18-9567

PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., Petitioner,


v.


Respondents, THE CITY OF SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, et al.,



[Caption Continued from Previous Page]

No. 18-9568

THE CITY OF SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, et al., Petitioners,


v.


Respondents, CTIA—THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, et al.,


No. 18-9571

CITY OF SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, et al., Petitioners,

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA, et al., Intervenors - Petitioners,

v.


Respondents.


[Caption Continued from Previous Page]

No. 18-9572

CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, Petitioner,

THE CITY OF SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, et al., Intervenors - Petitioners,

v.


Respondents.


- 1 -

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission)

and the United States of America respectfully oppose the San Jose

Petitioners’ motion to transfer these cases, which seek review of the

FCC’s Declaratory Ruling and Third Report & Order, Accelerating

Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure

Investment, --- FCC Rcd. ---, FCC 18-133 (rel. Sept. 27, 2018) (September

Order).

Under the judicial lottery procedures of 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a), the

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation designated this Court as the

forum to decide any petitions for review of the September Order. San

Jose misreads federal law as requiring transfer to the Ninth Circuit after

the Judicial Panel randomly assigned all six qualifying petitions, filed in

four different circuits, to this Circuit. San Jose insists that these cases

must be transferred to the Ninth Circuit because it contends that the

September Order is “the same order” as the FCC’s August Order,1 which

has been challenged in the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits. That premise

1 Third Report & Order and Declaratory Ruling, Accelerating Wireline

Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, 33 FCC Rcd. 7705 (rel. Aug. 3, 2018) (August Order), pets. for review pending, City of Portland v. FCC, No. 18-72689 (9th Cir. filed Oct. 2, 2018), and Am. Elec. Power Servs. Corp. v. FCC, No. 18-14408 (11th Cir. filed Oct. 18, 2018).


- 2 -

is incorrect: The August Order and the September Order are separate

standalone orders that were adopted by separate votes on separate

documents at separate times based on differing records (with over 700

additional record submissions for the September Order), and the two

orders each address separate and discrete subjects. San Jose also has

not shown that transfer is necessary for the convenience of the parties or

in the interest of justice. To the contrary, while San Jose and Seattle

filed petitions for review in the Ninth Circuit, municipalities located in

eleven of twelve regional circuits filed separate petitions in the Fourth,

Eighth, and D.C. Circuits, belying any argument that the Ninth Circuit

is uniquely situated to hear this case. In short, there is no reason why

this Court, which often hears cases involving the Communications Act,

should transfer the consolidated petitions. The motion to transfer should

be denied.

1. The September Order was released on September 27, 2018, and

a summary was published in the Federal Register on October 15, 2018.

See 83 Fed. Reg. 51867. Any party aggrieved by an FCC order may file a

petition for review in the federal courts of appeals. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2342(1),

2344; 47 U.S.C. § 402(a). Separate petitions for review of the September


- 3 -

Order have been filed in the First, Second, Fourth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth,

and D.C. Circuits. See Addendum A (listing petitions).

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a), when petitions for review of an FCC

order are filed in multiple circuits and date-stamped copies are served on

the agency within ten days after issuance of the order, the Judicial Panel

on Multidistrict Litigation conducts a judicial lottery to designate one

court of appeals, from among those receiving qualifying petitions, in

which the record is to be filed. 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a)(1)–(3). All petitions

for review challenging that order must then be transferred to the court

in which the record is filed. Id. § 2112(a)(5).

Petitions qualifying for the judicial lottery were filed in the First,

Second, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits, and the Judicial Panel randomly

selected this Circuit as the court in which the record is to be filed. See

Consolidation Order, In re FCC, MCP No. 155 (J.P.M.L. Nov. 2, 2018).

Because the Tenth Circuit has been designated as the court in which the

record is to be filed, “[a]ll courts in which proceedings are instituted with

respect to the same order”—here, the September Order—“shall transfer

those proceedings to” this Court, and this Court thereafter can transfer

the petitions to another circuit only “[f]or the convenience of the parties

in the interest of justice.” 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a)(5).


- 4 -

Given the Judicial Panel’s designation of this Court to review all

challenges to the September Order, the First, Second, and Ninth Circuits

transferred the petitions initially filed in those circuits to this Court.

Separately, other petitions for review of the September Order (that were

filed after or did not qualify for the judicial lottery) have been filed in the

Fourth,2 Eighth,3 Ninth,4 and D.C. Circuits.5 The FCC has filed

unopposed motions to transfer the petitions filed in the Fourth and D.C.

Circuits to this Court, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a)(5), and will soon

be moving to transfer the petitions recently filed in the Eighth and Ninth

Circuits (which were just received this morning). The Fourth Circuit has

already granted the FCC’s motion and ordered its case transferred to this

Circuit.

2 Montgomery County v. FCC, No. 18-2448 (4th Cir. filed Dec. 5, 2018)

(order granting transfer to Tenth Circuit issued December 13, 2018). 3 City of N. Little Rock v. FCC, No. 18-3678 (8th Cir. filed Dec. 14, 2018). 4 City & Cnty. of S.F. v. United States, No. 18-73376 (9th Cir. filed Dec.

14, 2018). 5 AT&T Servs., Inc. v. FCC, No. 18-1294 (D.C. Cir. filed Oct. 25, 2018);

Am. Pub. Power Ass’n v. FCC, No. 18-1305 (D.C. Cir. filed Nov. 15, 2018); City of Austin v. FCC, No. 18-1326 (D.C. Cir. filed Dec. 11, 2018); City of Eugene v. FCC, No. 18-1330 (D.C. Cir. filed Dec. 12, 2018).


- 5 -

2. a. San Jose is incorrect that these cases should be transferred to

the Ninth Circuit because the September Order “can be treated as the

same order” (Mot. 5) as the August Order. Nothing in the orders supports

that claim. The two orders are separate, standalone documents. The

orders were considered and adopted at separate times—indeed, nearly

eight weeks apart—with the Commissioners casting separate (and

differing) votes on each order. Separate documents that are adopted at

separate times by separate action are presumed not to be the same order.

See, e.g., Far East Conference v. Fed. Mar. Comm’n, 337 F.2d 146, 148 n.1

(D.C. Cir. 1964) (maritime orders adopted at different times and directed

to different trade routes and commodities “cannot be considered the

‘same order’ within the meaning of” 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a) even if the orders

are substantially identical); Midwest Video Corp. v. United States, 362

F.2d 259, 260–61 (8th Cir. 1966) (per curiam).

The August Order and the September Order likewise do not

constitute “the same order” because they each address separate and

discrete subjects. The August Order addresses federal pole attachment

rules under 47 U.S.C. § 224, August Order ¶¶ 13–139, and state and local

moratoria on new wireline and wireless infrastructure through explicit

or de facto refusals to allow deployment, id. ¶¶ 140–168. The September


- 6 -

Order, by contrast, does not relate to either state or local moratoria or

pole attachment rules, nor does it apply to wireline facilities. Rather, it

addresses three discrete subjects in the specific context of small wireless

facilities: fees and charges assessed by state and local governments,

September Order ¶¶ 43–80; aesthetic requirements and similar issues,

id. ¶¶ 81–91; and timelines for state and local authorizations, id. ¶¶ 103–

147. The fact that the September Order addresses different subjects from

the August Order further supports the conclusion that it is not “the same

order” under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a)(5). See Mobil Oil Expl. Co. v. FERC,

814 F.2d 1001, 1003 (5th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (denying motion to

transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 2112 where orders were “issued by the same

regulatory body under the same statutory authority” but addressed

different subjects); Midwest, 362 F.2d at 260–61 (denying motion to

transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 2112 because “[i]t is apparent that the second

order presents issues not raised by the first order” and that “jurisdiction

to review the first order does not carry with it jurisdiction to review the

second order”).

This case thus presents the opposite situation from American

Electric Power Services Corp. v. FCC, No. 18-14408 (11th Cir.) (AEP), in

which the FCC has moved to transfer a challenge to the August Order


- 7 -

that was filed in the Eleventh Circuit to be consolidated with an earlier

challenge to the August Order that was filed in the Ninth Circuit.6 (The

Eleventh Circuit has not yet acted on that motion as of this filing.) In

that case, the petitions for review in the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits

challenged literally “the same order”: Each challenged aspects of a single

document adopted at a single time by a single vote of the Commission.

Here, by contrast, San Jose’s petition challenges a different order that

was adopted at a separate time in a separate vote on a separate

standalone document.

b. San Jose insists that these two separate orders must be treated

as “the same order” because they “are associated with the same dockets

[and] arise out of the same administrative record” (Mot. 5). But San Jose

then concedes in a footnote (Mot. 5 n.2) that the administrative records

are not in fact the same, because the record before the Commission when

it adopted the August Order necessarily closed upon that order’s adoption

in early August, whereas the record underlying the September Order did

6 The challenges to the August Order were not filed within the ten-day

window for a judicial lottery, so challenges to the August Order must be transferred to the circuit in which the first petition for review was filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a)(1), (5).


- 8 -

not close until late September. See Bar MK Ranches v. Yuetter, 994 F.2d

735, 739 (10th Cir. 1993) (judicial review of an agency decision is “based

on the full administrative record that was before [the agency] at the time

of the decision”).

Contrary to San Jose’s representation that the two orders “arise out

of the same administrative record” (Mot. 5), in the nearly eight weeks

between the adoption of the August Order and the adoption of the

September Order, interested parties made more than 700 additional

submissions to the FCC. See Addendum B (list of additional record

submissions). And, indeed, the September Order discusses and relies on

numerous letters and other submissions that were submitted to the

agency after the release of the August Order, and thus are not part of the

record that will be filed with the court reviewing the August Order. See,

e.g., September Order nn.246–247, 253, 296.

Nor do these two separate orders become “the same order” simply

because they were cross-filed in the same agency dockets (Mot. 5)—an

omnibus docket for wireline infrastructure issues and an omnibus docket

for wireless infrastructure issues. While the two orders were cross-filed

in the same two agency dockets, the lead docket for each order is


- 9 -

different, reflecting their different subjects.7 In any event, the FCC

routinely issues multiple separate orders under a given agency docket,

and those separate orders are often reviewed by separate circuits. Here,

for example, an earlier order in the same wireless infrastructure docket

as the September Order was adopted in March and is currently under

review by the D.C. Circuit. See Second Report & Order, Accelerating

Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure

Investment, --- FCC Rcd. ---, FCC 18-30 (rel. Mar. 30, 2018) (March

Order), pets. for review pending, United Keetowah Band of Cherokee

Indians in Okla. v. FCC, Nos. 18-1129 et al. (D.C. Cir. filed May 9, 2018).

If San Jose were correct that separate orders associated with the same

agency docket must be treated as “the same order,” then it should be

seeking transfer to the D.C. Circuit, not the Ninth Circuit—but no party

takes that position.

7 The August Order addresses subjects that are of similar significance

to both traditional wireline and wireless service alike, so the lead docket listed on that order is the wireline docket (WC Docket No. 17-84). The September Order focuses principally on obstacles to wireless infrastructure deployment, so the lead docket listed on that order is the wireless docket (WT Docket No. 17-79). This is also why the two orders each contain sections labeled “Third Report and Order”: The August Order is the Third Report and Order in the wireline docket, whereas the September Order is the Third Report and Order in the wireless docket.


- 10 -

San Jose’s claim that the August Order and the September Order

are the same order rests (Mot. 4–5) primarily on an unpublished and

inapposite D.C. Circuit order concerning challenges to two FCC orders

that were adopted on the same day as part of “a single agency

undertaking.” Bell Atl. Tel. Cos. v. FCC, 1996 WL 734326, at *1 (D.C.

Cir. Nov. 25, 1996). In deciding to treat those orders as “the same order,”

the D.C. Circuit addressed the unusual situation where two closely

related orders were considered and adopted together based on an

identical agency record. That unusual situation is not present here,

because the separate orders at issue were considered and adopted

separately at separate times and because the record relied on by the

September Order contains hundreds of submissions that are not part of

the record underlying the August Order.8

8 For similar reasons, San Jose errs (Mot. 5) in citing American Civil

Liberties Union v. FCC, 486 F.2d 411 (D.C. Cir. 1973) (ACLU). In that case, the court found that challenges to several orders that “represent the staggered implementation of a single, multi-faceted agency undertaking” in a “prolonged and complex proceeding” should be consolidated because separate review would “result[] in the action of the agency being subjected to fragmentary review by different courts.” Id. at 414. There is no prospect of “fragmentary review” here, because the two orders address different subjects, nor can the two separate wireless and wireline dockets be characterized as part of a single “prolonged and complex proceeding.”


- 11 -

3. San Jose also briefly argues (Mot. 6–8) for a discretionary

transfer “for the convenience of the parties in the interests of justice”

under the second sentence of 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a)(5), but it has not shown

any compelling reason for transfer here. Notably, the array of petitioners

challenging the September Order do not even take a uniform view that

the Judicial Panel’s selection of this Court is inconvenient for the parties;

indeed, several petitioners oppose transfer.

“The only significant convenience factor which affects petitioners

seeking review of rulemaking on an agency record is the convenience of

counsel who will brief and argue the petitions,” because “[r]eview is

confined to the agency record” and the parties themselves need not

appear in court. United Steelworkers of Am. v. Marshall, 592 F.2d 693,

697 (3d Cir. 1979). While the San Jose Petitioners are located in the

Ninth Circuit, their counsel is based in the District of Columbia. Even

more notably, while the Seattle Petitioners are located in the Ninth

Circuit, their lead counsel is based in Denver. And the same Denver-

based counsel is also lead counsel for a group of intervenors that includes

the Colorado Communications and Utility Alliance, an association of 57


- 12 -

local government entities throughout Colorado.9 To the extent San Jose

contends that the Ninth Circuit would be more convenient simply

because some petitioners are located in that circuit, granting its request

would needlessly inconvenience the parties and their counsel who are

located in this Circuit.

Other parties and their counsel are located throughout the country,

including other petitioners who sought review in this Court or other

circuits. San Jose does not contend that transfer to the Ninth Circuit

would appreciably advance the convenience of these other parties, and it

may even inconvenience them; indeed, several of these petitioners oppose

transfer to the Ninth Circuit. And though San Jose contends that “states

and their subdivisions’ interests are far more affected by this Order than

are the interests of other petitioners” (Mot. 8), courts have “made clear

that ‘it is inappropriate to compare the relative aggrievement’” of parties

challenging the order when considering a transfer motion. Oil, Chem. &

Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. NLRB, 694 F.2d 1289, 1300

9 See City of Bakersfield et al. Motion for Leave to Intervene at 2 n.1,

City of Seattle v. FCC, No. 18-9571 (10th Cir. filed Nov. 23, 2018) (describing the Colorado Communications and Utility Alliance and its members).


- 13 -

(D.C. Cir. 1982) (quoting Liquor Salesmen’s Union Local 2 v. NLRB, 664

F.2d 1200, 1206 (D.C. Cir. 1981)). San Jose’s preference to challenge the

September Order in the Ninth Circuit does not override the operation of

the judicial lottery mechanism or deprive other aggrieved parties of their

right to seek review in another forum.

None of the issues addressed in the September Order are in any way

specific to the Ninth Circuit. The September Order established nationwide

rules governing the deployment of small wireless facilities across the

country. While San Jose and Seattle filed their petitions for review in

the Ninth Circuit, other municipalities filed similar petitions in the

Fourth, Eighth, and D.C. Circuits—including a joint petition in the D.C.

Circuit filed by municipalities located in eleven of the twelve regional

circuits. See City of Austin v. FCC, No. 18-1326 (D.C. Cir. filed Dec. 11,

2018) (filed on behalf of municipalities in the First, Second, Third,

Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Eleventh, and D.C.

Circuits).

Nor is there any merit to San Jose’s claim (Mot. 6-7) that the

interest of justice requires that the two orders be heard by the same court

to ensure consistent outcomes. Although both orders involve, among

other issues, the Commission’s interpretation of the “effective


- 14 -

prohibition” language in Sections 253 and 332(c)(7) of the

Communications Act, they apply that interpretation in wholly distinct

contexts. Cf. Mobil Oil, 814 F.2d at 1003 (holding that “[t]hese

similarities are not such * * * as to advise or compel a transfer” where

two orders used the same statutory authority to address different issues).

And while the September Order contains a handful of citations to the

August Order, it does not rely on the August Order for any of its legal

conclusions. Most of these citations appear in string cites as but one of

several authorities for a well-established legal proposition; some simply

describe actions that the Commission has taken in the past to provide

historical background; and yet others distinguish matters addressed in

the August Order.

That the September Order does not rely on the August Order is

underscored by footnotes 79 and 103 of the September Order, in which

the Commission acknowledged that several parties have petitioned for

agency reconsideration of the August Order and explained that the

determinations in the September Order did not require the Commission

to resolve the petitions for reconsideration (which remain pending). The

Commission thus made clear that the September Order stands on its own,

and will continue to stand even if the petitions for reconsideration lead it


- 15 -

to modify or rescind the August Order. And just as the September Order

would stand if the Commission were to reconsider or rescind the August

Order, so too the September Order would stand even if a court were to

vacate the August Order. There is thus no reason to expect the Ninth

Circuit’s disposition of challenges to the August Order to require any

particular outcome on review of the September Order—or vice versa,

should this Court decide the challenges to the September Order before

the Ninth Circuit acts10—and thus no inconsistency in allowing the two

different orders to be reviewed by two different courts.

Finally, San Jose suggests (Mot. 7) that this case should be in the

Ninth Circuit because it wishes to rely on a prior Ninth Circuit case

addressing 47 U.S.C. §§ 253 and 332(c)(7). But it neglects to mention

that this Court has also issued a series of decisions interpreting those

same statutory provisions. See, e.g., T-Mobile Cent., LLC v. Unified Gov’t

of Wyandotte Cnty., 546 F.3d 1299 (10th Cir. 2008); Qwest Corp. v. City

of Santa Fe, 380 F.3d 1258 (10th Cir. 2004); RT Commc’ns, Inc. v. FCC,

10 The Commission has moved to hold the Ninth Circuit’s review of the

August Order in abeyance until the agency rules on the petitions for reconsideration of that order. If the Ninth Circuit grants that motion, that would only further diminish any argument for transfer.


- 16 -

201 F.3d 1264 (10th Cir. 2000). There is thus no reason to think the

Ninth Circuit has any greater facility with those statutory provisions

than this Court—assuming that were even a relevant consideration. Cf.

Am. Pub. Gas Ass’n v. Fed. Power Comm’n, 555 F.2d 852, 857–58 & n.3

(D.C. Cir. 1976) (per curiam) (rejecting similar argument because

“[i]mplicit in the argument is a concept of specialized circuits and panels

for certain types of cases, a suggestion we have previously rejected”). It

would hardly be in the interests of justice to saddle the Ninth Circuit

with a sprawling and potentially unmanageable case involving separate

Commission decisions relating to pole attachments, infrastructure

deployment moratoria, state and local fees, aesthetic requirements, and

timelines for state and local authorizations.


- 17 -

CONCLUSION

The motions to transfer should be denied.11

Dated: December 17, 2018 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Scott M. Noveck

Makan Delrahim Assistant Attorney General

Robert B. Nicholson Adam D. Chandler

Attorneys U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 950 PENNSYLVANIA Ave. NW Washington, DC 20530 Counsel for Respondent

United States of America

Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. General Counsel

David M. Gossett Deputy General Counsel

Jacob M. Lewis Associate General Counsel

Scott M. Noveck Counsel

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 (202) 418-1740 [email protected] Counsel for Respondent Federal

Communications Commission

11 The Court has also asked the FCC to “address whether transfer is

permissible before the agency record is filed.” 11/30/18 Order at 4. In the FCC’s view, once the Judicial Panel has issued a consolidation order designating the court in which the record is to be filed, there is no good reason to postpone the disposition of any transfer motions until the record is officially filed.


- 18 -

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH TYPE-VOLUME LIMIT

Certificate of Compliance With Type-Volume Limitation, Typeface Requirements and Type Style Requirements

1. This document complies with the type-volume limit of Fed. R. App. P. 27(d)(2)(A) because, excluding the parts of the document exempted by Fed. R. App. P. 32(f):

☒ this document contains 3,574 words, or

☐ this document uses a monospaced typeface and contains lines of text.

2. This document complies with the typeface requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(5) and the type style requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(6) because:

☒ this document has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using Microsoft Word 2016 in 14-point Century Schoolbook, or

☐ this document has been prepared in a monospaced spaced typeface using with .

/s/ Scott M. Noveck Scott M. Noveck Counsel for Respondents


- 19 -

CERTIFICATE OF DIGITAL SUBMISSION

I hereby certify that with respect to the foregoing document:

1. All required privacy redactions have been made per Tenth

Circuit Rule 25.5.

2. If required to file additional hard copies, the ECF submission is

an exact copy of those documents.

3. The digital submissions have been scanned for viruses with the

most recent version of a commercial virus scanning program, Cylance

PROTECT Version 2.0.1500.18 (current as of December 17, 2018), and

according to the program are free of viruses.



- 20 -

CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 17, 2018, I caused the foregoing

Opposition to Motion to Transfer to be filed with the Clerk of Court for

the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit using the

electronic CM/ECF system. I further certify that all participants in the

case, listed below, are registered CM/ECF users and will be served

electronically by the CM/ECF system.


Service List:

Christopher J. Wright Elizabeth Austin Bonner HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS 1919 M Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner/Intervenor

Sprint Corporation

Henry Weissmann MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON 350 South Grand Avenue 50th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner/Intervenor

Verizon Communications, Inc.


[Service List Continued from Previous Page]

- 21 -

Jonathan Meltzer MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON 1155 F Street, NW, 7th Floor Washington, DC 20004 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner/Intervenor

Verizon Communications, Inc.

Megan L. Brown Jeremy J. Broggi WILEY REIN 1776 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner Puerto Rico

Telephone Company, Inc.

Joseph Leonard Van Eaton BEST BEST & KRIEGER 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 5300 Washington, DC 20006 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners/Intervenors

The City of San Jose, California, et al.

Gail A Karish BEST BEST & KRIEGER 300 South Grand Avenue 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners/Intervenors

The City of San Jose, California, et al.

Kenneth S. Fellman KISSINGER & FELLMAN 3773 Cherry Creek North Drive Ptarmigan Place, Suite 900 Denver, CO 80209 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners City of

Seattle, Washington, et al. and Intervenors City of Coconut Creek, Florida, et al.

Robert Carroll May III TELECOM LAW FIRM 3570 Camino del Rio North Suite 102 San Diego, CA 92108 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners

League of Oregon Cities et al. and Intervenors City of Bakersfield, California, et al.



- 22 -

Michael J. Vigliotta Scott Franklin Field OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street, P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner

City of Huntington Beach

Tillman L Lay Jeffrey Michael Bayne SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID 1875 Eye St., NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Intervenors

City of Eugene, Oregon, et al.

MacKenzie Fillow NEW YORK CITY LAW DEPARTMENT 100 Church Street, Room 6-200 New York, NY 10007 [email protected] Counsel for Intervenor

City of New York

Joshua Scott Turner Sara Baxenberg WILEY REIN 1776 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Intervenor

CTIA—The Wireless Association

Jennifer P. Bagg Susannah J. Larson HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS 1919 M Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Intervenor

Competitive Carriers Association

Thomas Scott Thompson DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE 1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20006-3401 [email protected] Counsel for Intervenor Wireless

Infrastructure Association



- 23 -

Robert Nicholson Adam D. Chandler U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Respondent United

States of America


Add. 1

ADDENDUM A

Petitions for Review of the September Order

Tenth Circuit:

• Sprint Corp. v. FCC, No. 18-9563 (10th Cir. filed Oct. 25, 2018)

• Verizon Communications, Inc. v. FCC, No. 18-9566 (10th Cir. docketed Nov. 2, 2018) (originally filed Oct. 25, 2018)

• Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. FCC, No. 18-9567 (10th Cir. docketed Nov. 5, 2018) (originally filed Oct. 25, 2018)

• City of San Jose v. FCC, No. 18-9568 (10th Cir. docketed Nov. 7, 2018) (originally filed Oct. 24, 2018)

• City of Seattle v. FCC, No. 18-9571 (10th Cir. docketed Nov. 7, 2018) (originally filed Oct. 24, 2018)

• City of Huntington Beach v. FCC, No. 18-9572 (10th Cir. docketed Nov. 7, 2018) (originally filed Oct. 24, 2018)

Fourth Circuit:

• Montgomery County v. FCC, No. 18-2448 (4th Cir. filed Dec. 5, 2018) (order granting transfer to the Tenth Circuit issued December 13, 2018)

Eighth Circuit:

• City of North Little Rock v. FCC, No. 18-3678 (8th Cir. filed Dec. 14, 2018) (motion to transfer to the Tenth Circuit to be filed)

Ninth Circuit:

• City & County of San Francisco v. United States, No. 18-73376 (9th Cir. filed Dec. 14, 2018) (motion to transfer to the Tenth Circuit to be filed)


Add. 2

D.C. Circuit:

• AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, No. 18-1294 (D.C. Cir. filed Oct. 25, 2018) (unopposed motion to transfer to the Tenth Circuit filed November 13, 2018)

• American Public Power Ass’n v. FCC, No. 18-1305 (D.C. Cir. filed Nov. 15, 2018) (consolidated with No. 18-1294 and subject to pending motion to transfer to the Tenth Circuit)

• City of Austin v. FCC, No. 18-1326 (D.C. Cir. filed Dec. 11, 2018) (consolidated with No. 18-1294 and subject to pending motion to transfer to the Tenth Circuit)

• City of Eugene v. FCC, No. 18-1330 (D.C. Cir. filed Dec. 12, 2018) (consolidated with No. 18-1294 and subject to pending motion to transfer to the Tenth Circuit)


Add. 3

ADDENDUM B

List of Additional Record Submissions

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 8/3/2018 Alexis Pipkins https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108031036606166

8/3/2018 Anthony Trapchak https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803205926787

8/3/2018 Braden Pace https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080365199517

8/3/2018 brett marsh https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080334825948

8/3/2018 Cara Pace https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803931011736

8/3/2018 Charles Hannah https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803157116635

8/3/2018 Chris O'Shea https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803438107784

8/3/2018 Christopher Beattie https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108031983508576

8/3/2018 Christopher Seal https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108031099505919

8/3/2018 Daniel Akins https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108031824607095

8/3/2018 Dean Robitaille https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108031264211605

8/3/2018 Doris Hudson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803018822823

8/3/2018 Doug Tanner https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803022857856

8/3/2018 Dwayne Williams https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803922418089

8/3/2018 Eric Henry https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080391233659

8/3/2018 Esther bishop https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803148419547

8/3/2018 Grant Welch https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108032027809202

8/3/2018 Ian Brown https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803277919958

8/3/2018 James DANIELS https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803258618968

8/3/2018 Jasok Guillotte https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803878018364

8/3/2018 Jason McGrath https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803084401035

8/3/2018 JEROME WESTER https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803087045073

8/3/2018 Jessica Baldwin https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803251910284

8/3/2018 Joseph Ward https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080381549267


https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108031036606166
























Add. 4

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 8/3/2018 Keith Hunter https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803019182391

8/3/2018 Lawrence Smith https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108032405906177

8/3/2018 Mao Mooney https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803900405208

8/3/2018 Mary Johnson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080348921101

8/3/2018 Mike Koenig https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080386719609

8/3/2018 Mitchell Henderson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080345657016

8/3/2018 Oscar Cardenas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803112045619

8/3/2018 paul merrill https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080383582972

8/3/2018 Robby Pace https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803515229126

8/3/2018 Robert Lamoureux https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803628107336

8/3/2018 Robert Pollock https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803738312982

8/3/2018 Samuel Choc https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080393027033

8/3/2018 Tamar Hernandez https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080342234626

8/3/2018 Terry Dugan https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080346606351

8/3/2018 Tim Childres https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803289421517

8/3/2018 Tom Kounnas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080303812056

8/3/2018 Venson Smith https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108032283004118

8/3/2018 Virginia Massey https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803529017452

8/3/2018 Wade Kilgore https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803109806023

8/3/2018 William White https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10803134647297

8/6/2018 AT&T Services, Inc. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10806085432193

8/6/2018 Ben King https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080471508038

8/6/2018 Carolyn A. Prince https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10806464901215

8/6/2018 David Roetman https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108061356213194

8/6/2018 Paul Grohman https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080469937753

8/6/2018 Timothy Leslie https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10805064135720

8/7/2018 City of Austin https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10807670805455

8/7/2018 Terry Alexander https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108071369724733






























Add. 5

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 8/8/2018 Association of American Railroads https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10808116114407

8/8/2018 Girard Moore https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108080700704484

8/8/2018 Jonathan Daniels https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1080802329749

8/8/2018 Shannon Palmer https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108082890812211

8/9/2018 Lawana Mayfield https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10810152514196

8/9/2018 Public Knowledge https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10809269611247

8/10/2018 American Tower Corporation https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1081010935734

8/10/2018 Angela Fox https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108102593520654


8/10/2018 Crown Castle https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10810312521593

8/10/2018 CTIA and Wireless Infrastructure Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10810298508690

8/10/2018 Public Knowledge https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10810250879708

8/10/2018 Verizon https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10810285875669


8/13/2018 Commissioner Sal Pace https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1081323736598

8/13/2018 Karon Gubbrud https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10812212018992

8/13/2018 NCTA - The Internet & Television Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1081301353921

8/13/2018 Senator Duane Ankney https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10813638017316

8/13/2018 Sprint https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108130888126150

8/13/2018 Stratus Networks https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1082282509043

8/17/2018 INCOMPAS https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1081710079256

8/17/2018 Office of General Counsel https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/081718591571

8/17/2018 tester https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108171783901988

8/20/2018 Benjamin L. Yousef https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108200039605529

8/20/2018 City of Palo Alto, California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108200187221825

8/20/2018 NCTA - The Internet & Television Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108202002411328

8/20/2018 Northern Dakota County Cable Communications Commission https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10820019832278





























Add. 6

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 8/21/2018 City of Mukilteo https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1082161533759

8/21/2018 Diamond Communications LLC https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10821216037970

8/21/2018 Frank Scammell https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108212969027478

8/21/2018 Southwest Suburban Cable Commission https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10821943716239

8/22/2018 City of Portland, Oregon https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10822136229600

8/22/2018 City of San Jose, California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108221650207848

8/22/2018 Jeff Bohm https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10822015184963

8/22/2018 Uniti Fiber https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108222913714761

8/23/2018 City of Bloomington, Minnesota https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1082333657951

8/23/2018 Mayor and Council of Rockville https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1082300946978


8/24/2018 Andrew Thompson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1082492178054

8/24/2018 Douglas County, Colorado https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1082416288870

8/27/2018 John King https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108270595820025

8/27/2018 Prysmian Group https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10825634717632

8/27/2018 Wireless Internet Service Providers Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10827118627616

8/28/2018 Jason Kaiman https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10828142445623

8/28/2018 Vermeer Corporation https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10829248354634

8/29/2018 Cheryl Weisheit https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1082926310151

8/29/2018 Corning Incorporated https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10829149623610

8/30/2018 City of Lincoln, Nebraska https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1083065780631

8/30/2018 City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10830111857503

8/30/2018 CTIA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10831104660066

8/30/2018 Kimberly Dudik,Jody Thomas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1083025005914

8/30/2018 Mark Gorman https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108302206313216



8/30/2018 Michael C. Taylor https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10830132734077






























Add. 7

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 8/30/2018 Nokia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10830228301910

8/30/2018 Skyway Towers https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108301086805673

8/30/2018 Wireless Infrastructure Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108300290817489

8/31/2018 Brian Hill https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1083114849253

8/31/2018 National Coalition on Black Civic Participation https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/108312889422413

9/4/2018 American Council of the blind https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109041635307239

9/4/2018 City of San Jose, Calfornia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1090486618420

9/4/2018 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/0904173198781



9/4/2018 david roetman; https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10904518300320

9/4/2018 Marin Telecommunications Agency https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10906253119752

9/4/2018 Michael C. Levine https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1090447719071

9/4/2018 National Caucus and Center on Black Aging https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10904097802078

9/4/2018 Niraj Antani https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1090414176472

9/4/2018 Smart Communities,Special Districts Coalition https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10904323720005

9/4/2018 The City of New York - DoITT https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10904196886754

9/5/2018 Corning Incorporated https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10905352013311

9/5/2018 LGBT Technology Partnership https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10905072215911

9/5/2018 Marcella Gadson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1090687144517

9/5/2018 National Hispanic Council on Aging https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10905899708505

9/5/2018 United Spinal Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10905130766650

9/5/2018 Verticom https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109053070717503

9/5/2018 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-353962A1.pdf

9/6/2018 Candace Waterman, Women Impacting Public Policy https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10906146386745

9/6/2018 City of Lake Forest https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10906122815390



























Add. 8

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/6/2018 CTIA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1090610768719

9/6/2018 Jean Rasch https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1090667360935

9/6/2018 NTCA-The Rural Broadband Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1090618571908

9/6/2018 Smart Communities and Special Districts Coalition https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10906119432986

9/6/2018

Smart Communities Coalition,National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors,National League of Cities,U.S. Conference of Mayors https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10906149012775



9/7/2018 The Village of Greendale, WI https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109072339701081


9/10/2018 Dan Shaul https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10910035431765

9/10/2018 LOIS HANSEN https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10910560125092


9/10/2018 NCTA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109102404924504

9/10/2018 Scottsville Magisterial District of Albemarle County https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109100508625895


9/10/2018 Wallowa County Board of Commissioners https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109102299418558


9/10/2018 Wireless Internet Service Providers Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109100680518364

9/10/2018 Wireline Competition Bureau https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/0910235611003


9/11/2018 Fred. A Lamphere, Butte County Sheriff https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10911976528715

9/11/2018 Massachusetts Municipal Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10911732627893
























Add. 9

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/11/2018 Wireless Internet Service Providers Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091159287620

9/12/2018 City of College Park,Mayor Patrick Wojahn https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109121797010716

9/12/2018 Elaine Unger,John Unger https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913026262618

9/12/2018 H davis https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091370882185

9/12/2018 H davis https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913034198758


9/12/2018 Kristi Lentz https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109132355309239

9/12/2018 Lonnie Gilbert https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091391748532

9/12/2018 Mike Posey,City of Huntington Beach https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091224380285

9/12/2018 Mobilitie, LLC https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10912394120932

9/12/2018 Noah A. Simon https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10912565921335

9/12/2018 Noah A. Simon https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10912443205763


9/12/2018 Robert Brunson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091211518071

9/12/2018 Steven,Wade https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091266384982

9/12/2018 Town of Culpeper, Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091263539922


9/13/2018 Charles Martin https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109131147510232

9/13/2018 Cindy Sage, MA, Sage Associates https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913417829818

9/13/2018 City Attorney's Office, Casper, Wyoming https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109130321721302

9/13/2018 City of Coshocton https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091328495462

9/13/2018 city of north port https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913068970864

9/13/2018 City of Wickliffe, Ohio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913108759087

9/13/2018 Condux International, Inc. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913052283969

9/13/2018 County of Prince George, Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913181280369

9/13/2018 Dave Molidor https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109130143207895

9/13/2018 Genna Biddix https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109132680024793

9/13/2018 Jeanice Barcelo https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10914046724667






























Add. 10

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/13/2018 Julie Conrad https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091398910618

9/13/2018 Keith Mays https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091388006311

9/13/2018 Kiel Mangus, City of Manhattan https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913776904233

9/13/2018 Kirstin Beatty https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109132083118760



9/13/2018 Marilynne Martin https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091306834579

9/13/2018 Mark Graham https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091356675313


9/13/2018 North Royalton Ward 3 City Councilman Dan Langshaw https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109132922823558

9/13/2018 Richard A. Edwards, Mayor https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913949116785

9/13/2018 Richard K. Mavis, Mayor https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913393015823

9/13/2018 Susan Nine https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913074430733

9/13/2018 Tony Tollner https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091358142474

9/13/2018 Village of Bremen, Ohio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10913306959215

9/13/2018 Village of New Concord, Ohio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091383797707

9/14/2018 Alison Fox Mazzola https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10914229595112

9/14/2018 City of McAllen, Texas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10914587204491

9/14/2018 City of Virginia Beach, Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091401886241

9/14/2018 Collins L. Owens, Jr. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109142692017503

9/14/2018 David Meyer https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109142247815877

9/14/2018 Illinois Municipal League https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109141386713461

9/14/2018 Jean R Rasch https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10914671816071


9/14/2018 Kentucky League of Cities https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091406763815

9/14/2018 Lynn Stull, Lead Organizer for Oconomwoc for Safe Technology, UA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109141704015320




























Add. 11

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/14/2018 Mark Farina https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10914175157705

9/14/2018 Mark Wahl https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10914452717939

9/14/2018 Mary Burton https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10914712721430

9/14/2018 Mayor Mary Ann Lefker https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109142540700335

9/14/2018 Mayor Pauline Russo Cutter, City of San Leandro https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109142791916008

9/14/2018 Paul laura https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10914216702289

9/14/2018 Paul R Albrecht https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109142585810129

9/14/2018 Rep. Jason Saine https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109141963801467

9/14/2018 Richard J. Schuettler, Executive Director, PA Municipal League https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10914085228943

9/14/2018 Soula Culver https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091481564246

9/14/2018 Stephanie Austin https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109140834613444

9/14/2018 The Honorable Joe McComb https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091499825036

9/14/2018 Town of Ashland, VA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091423580569

9/14/2018 Town of Culpeper, VA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10914537421004

9/14/2018 TracFone Wireless, Inc. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109140137818978

9/14/2018 Village of Mariemont https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10914012406784

9/14/2018 William Murdock, Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109140369829775


9/17/2018 17-84 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091701455247

9/17/2018 17-84 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109170240324244

9/17/2018 Adam T. Van Dyke https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091713416466

9/17/2018 Adam T. Van Dyke https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091783040228

9/17/2018 Alan Jones https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918051420367

9/17/2018 Alan Jones https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918803118305

9/17/2018 Alan/Joanne Herren https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10916220186074

9/17/2018 Alan/Joanne Herren https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091619729043




























Add. 12

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/17/2018 Ann H Mallek https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180816704803

9/17/2018 Apex Towers https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917403725583

9/17/2018 April Blake https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091798651375

9/17/2018 Arlene F. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917240143591

9/17/2018 Barry Lerner https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109181092725471

9/17/2018 Bart Balmer https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918885324951

9/17/2018 Battista Adamo https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917035259230

9/17/2018 Battista Adamo https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917292326794

9/17/2018 Bert J. Goodrich https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917273653088

9/17/2018 Bonnie E MCMURRY https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917284967112



9/17/2018 Bonnie e McMurry https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917073664463



9/17/2018 Brett Bucher https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917974016176

9/17/2018 Brian Riblet https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917038597024

9/17/2018 BRIAN V JARVIS https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109160096718963

9/17/2018 Bridey Matheney https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917511226469

9/17/2018 C.L. Carlile https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109171302123883

9/17/2018 C.L. Carlile https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091704394075

9/17/2018 Carol Caywood https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10916158966914

9/17/2018 Carol Kuzdenyi,Tony Keppelman https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10916501023550

9/17/2018 Cate Leger https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109172272919826

9/17/2018 Cecile Leneman https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091707889929

9/17/2018 Chris C. Foulke https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091765460021

9/17/2018 Cincinnati Bell Inc. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109170897007271

9/17/2018 City of Clayton https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109170857803427






























Add. 13

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/17/2018 City of Dublin, Ohio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091720491755

9/17/2018 City of Everett WA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109150513901262

9/17/2018 Constance Anderson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918020123466

9/17/2018 Constance Anderson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180088429317

9/17/2018 Corinne Ashley Mayock Van Dyke https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109181702919287

9/17/2018 Corinne Ashley Mayock Van Dyke https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109182420808693

9/17/2018 Cynthia Price https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091629399558

9/17/2018 Damon Connolly, President, Marin County (CA) Board of Supervisors https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109170053526020

9/17/2018 Damon Connolly, President, Marin County (CA) Board of Supervisors https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091755359161

9/17/2018 Dan Newell https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109170510423676

9/17/2018 David Adams https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917058769061

9/17/2018 David Scheffler, Mayor https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917633729061

9/17/2018 Debra Albus https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091702158379

9/17/2018 Debra Albus https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109171578316289

9/17/2018 Debra DeKam https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091714838406

9/17/2018 Delegate Kathy Byron https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917610706528

9/17/2018 Deloitte Consulting LLP https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917691803972

9/17/2018 Donna DeSanto Ott https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918180014576

9/17/2018 Dr. Mary Jane Ingui https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917137340217

9/17/2018 Dr. Sandra Ross https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918846609669

9/17/2018 DUANE PETERSON https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091800507684

9/17/2018 E. Sandra Nixon https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917272609327

9/17/2018 E. Sandra Nixon https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917687525395

9/17/2018 Eleanor Lyman https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091636415936

9/17/2018 Ethan Pollack https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917792914577

9/17/2018 Ford Greene https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091759576296




























Add. 14

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/17/2018 Ford Greene https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917074179912

9/17/2018 Frank Gonzales Jr. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091707798403

9/17/2018 Garril Page https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10915212701124

9/17/2018 Georgia Municipal Association, Inc. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917182210085

9/17/2018 Harrison Township https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917945803380

9/17/2018 Heather Dauler https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917130618864

9/17/2018 Helene Robertson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917757013434

9/17/2018 Helene Robertson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109170631006968

9/17/2018 Jan Flanzer https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917295609245

9/17/2018 Jeanine Deal https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917742709970

9/17/2018 Jeffrey Palm https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917145011304

9/17/2018 Jeffrey R. Palm https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917194922117

9/17/2018 jessica bucher https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109172331017034

9/17/2018 jessica bucher https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091790330546

9/17/2018 Jessica Lerner https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091826135852

9/17/2018 Joan Capozzoli https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091753064320

9/17/2018 Joan Kaul https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091824648827

9/17/2018 Joan Kaul https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109181168215987

9/17/2018 Joe Jensen https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109171907903523

9/17/2018 Johanna Finney https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091701133738

9/17/2018 Johnson County, Iowa Planning, Development, and Sustainability Department https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917580712774

9/17/2018 Judy Aizuss https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091896729463

9/17/2018 Judy Aizuss https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918193008622

9/17/2018 Julie Van Balen https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917945425267

9/17/2018 Kate Kheel for Maryland Smart Meter Awareness https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918245556709

9/17/2018 Kathleen M. Sundmark,R. Paul Sundmark https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917507509335




























Add. 15

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/17/2018 Ken Albert https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091775538535

9/17/2018 Kiah Bosy https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918079426494

9/17/2018 kim Burggraf,Paul Harris https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180281016261

9/17/2018 Kim Hahn https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917382521921

9/17/2018 Kim Hahn https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917616728399

9/17/2018 Kip J. Hudson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091665765801

9/17/2018 Kristen Byrne https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109170503519883

9/17/2018 Kristin Dotterrer,Daniel Dotterrer https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10916054753407

9/17/2018 League of California Cities https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917531330502

9/17/2018 Leah Spitzer https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109172198013084

9/17/2018 Leslie Rosenfeld https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10916988520688

9/17/2018 Lisa Mayock https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918304552746

9/17/2018 m thurman https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917285216619

9/17/2018 Margaret Hall https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109162246827092

9/17/2018 Marin Lipowitz https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109172116212781



9/17/2018 Mark Schwieterman,Donald Patterson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091771794321

9/17/2018 McKinley County New Mexico https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091782076806

9/17/2018 Mike Mayock https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180330003224

9/17/2018 Ms. Anahaar https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917292703072

9/17/2018 Nancy Scheidt https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091537392109

9/17/2018 National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917465316626

9/17/2018 New Networks Institute,Irregulators https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918690818478

9/17/2018 Nicholas Ciappetta, Huntington Town Attorney https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109170457210303

9/17/2018 Nina Beety https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091787835748

9/17/2018 Nina Beety https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109171162407331





























Add. 16

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/17/2018 Nina Beety https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109170784130750

9/17/2018 Olemara Peters https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180369715910

9/17/2018 Olemara Peters https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918651007672

9/17/2018 Paige Clarke https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091798615583

9/17/2018 Pamela A Ruth https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109170044430323

9/17/2018 Pamela Menke https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091732573833

9/17/2018 Patricia Lesavoy, Ed.D. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180173307617

9/17/2018 Patricia Lesavoy, Ed.D. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918197977855

9/17/2018 Patricia R. Venza https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091693648414

9/17/2018 Pennsylvanians for Safe Technology https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917277109407

9/17/2018 Peter Donovan https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091896056969

9/17/2018 Phyllis Kirson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917230520171



9/17/2018 Rachel Gaunt https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109171292906938

9/17/2018 Rachel Gaunt https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109172855802986

9/17/2018 Ray Meyers https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917289137824

9/17/2018 Reinette Senum https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091781695611

9/17/2018 Richard Cristdahl https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917193401400

9/17/2018 Rick Gordon https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091677313498

9/17/2018 Robert Ernst https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109170568223127

9/17/2018 Robert Ernst https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091728313154

9/17/2018 Roberta Anthes https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918628314543

9/17/2018 Roberta Anthes https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091858665295

9/17/2018 S. Gregory https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109172975926753

9/17/2018 S.B. Straus https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918984018003

9/17/2018 Samuel Case https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091873442538





























Add. 17

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission

9/17/2018 Sarah Aminoff, California Alliance for Safer Technology https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091715005886

9/17/2018 sharon Hamilton https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10916198894841

9/17/2018 Stephanie Falcone https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918029722777

9/17/2018 Stephanie Falcone https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109181508521273

9/17/2018 Stephanie K Thomas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917197729578

9/17/2018 Stephanie K. Thomas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917122607629

9/17/2018 Stephen Phillip Romine https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917761210920

9/17/2018 Steven L. Schainker https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917212012369

9/17/2018 Steven Wasserman https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109172655905959

9/17/2018 Steven Wasserman https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917234355057

9/17/2018 Susan Gage https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917211799932

9/17/2018 Susan Nine https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10915161218259

9/17/2018 Taras Lumiere https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917843124369

9/17/2018 thomas schnaidt https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917885330165

9/17/2018 Tina Chow https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091719326762

9/17/2018 Toby Stover https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917597424848

9/17/2018 Vicki Gold https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10917282746499

9/17/2018 Victoria Sievers https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091616804532

9/17/2018 Wyoming Association of Municipalities https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091705276336

9/17/2018 you https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109182007102799

9/17/2018 you https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091870110858

9/17/2018 Zack Pelzel https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091856690205

9/18/2018 1 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091876557848

9/18/2018 Andrew Stone,Steve Patterson,City of Athens, OH https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918302337549

9/18/2018 Andy Leon Harney https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918743004128

9/18/2018 Arlington County Virginia government https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109181189029671




























Add. 18

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/18/2018 Board of Stevens County Commissioners https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918290000607

9/18/2018 Bonnie Michael https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180598309279

9/18/2018 Bonnie Michael https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091871068085

9/18/2018 Brad J. Townsend https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091891740389

9/18/2018 Brian Humphress, on behalf of the Miami Valley Communications Council https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918717300261

9/18/2018 Brian Lazor, City of Mason https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091841047969

9/18/2018 Cheriel Jensen https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918383317370

9/18/2018 Chevy Chase Village https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918323604670

9/18/2018 Chris Vitolins https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918154205120

9/18/2018 Chris Vitolins https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091831222665

9/18/2018 Cindy Jones Mills https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091829401090

9/18/2018 City of Akron https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091811886255

9/18/2018 City of Beachwood https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918787922599

9/18/2018 City of Beavercreek, Ohio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918899010606

9/18/2018 City of Braidwood https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091849462795

9/18/2018 City of Brookville https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192059811909

9/18/2018 City of Chardon https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918573230336

9/18/2018 City of Culver City https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180955611864

9/18/2018 City of Danville, Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091807939762

9/18/2018 City of Delaware https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918279388213

9/18/2018 City of Gaithersburg https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091880906436

9/18/2018 City of Hilliard, Ohio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918732919802

9/18/2018 City of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091875578853

9/18/2018 City of Kent, Ohio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091810619242

9/18/2018 City of Lorain Ohio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091893395461

9/18/2018 City of Mukilteo,City of Bremerton,City of Mountlake Terrace,City of Kirkland,City of https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109183078308187




























Add. 19


Redmond,City of Issaquah,City of Lake Stevens,City of Richland

9/18/2018 City of Newport, Minnesota https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091860405146

9/18/2018 City of Oberlin https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091804758676

9/18/2018 City Of Pendleton, Oregon https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10926088539553

9/18/2018 City of Piedmont https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918097503031

9/18/2018 City of Pismo Beach, California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091896919825

9/18/2018 City of Rochester New York https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918434917028

9/18/2018 City of San Jose https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918161513154

9/18/2018 Clark County, NV https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091826561770

9/18/2018 Coalition of Local Internet Choice https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091888884850

9/18/2018 Colorado Communications and Utility Alliance (CCUA) https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091806715499

9/18/2018 Communications Workers of America https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091924138490

9/18/2018 Consumers for Safe Cell Phones https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091888567788

9/18/2018 County of Louisa, Virginia,Jeffrey Ferrel,Christian Goodwin https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091872800549

9/18/2018 County of Yolo, California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091857979484


9/18/2018 Debra March https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091912829733

9/18/2018 Denise Capobianco https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918476614018

9/18/2018 Denise Capobianco https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091812390104

9/18/2018 Diane Barber https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918144943421

9/18/2018 EMF Safety Network https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918052322900

9/18/2018 Eric Holmes, City Manager, City of Vancouver, WA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091830079966

9/18/2018 Government of Stafford County Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918378924797

9/18/2018 IRREGULATORS,New Networks Institute https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091879852059

























Add. 20

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/18/2018 IRREGULATORS,New Networks Institute https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180323113314

9/18/2018 James M. Benster https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091873823526

9/18/2018 James M. Brown,Town of Poolesville https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091872773979

9/18/2018 janet FitzGerald https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091895090054

9/18/2018 Janet FitzGerald https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091878003458

9/18/2018 Janine McNamara https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109181765819703

9/18/2018 Jeffrey Arndt https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919960423410

9/18/2018 Jeffrey Arndt https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091944823061

9/18/2018 Jennifer Perez https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091964862387

9/18/2018 Jill Boudreau https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918140119228

9/18/2018 John Duffy https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918575527878

9/18/2018 John V. Cunard, Director https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091832677627

9/18/2018 John V. Cunard, Director https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918491321280

9/18/2018 Josh Cohn, Mayor https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091876394914

9/18/2018 Kate Kheel for Maryland Smart Meter Awareness https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918151883853

9/18/2018 Kate Reese Hurd https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109181266422922

9/18/2018 Katie McAuliffe https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091877950336

9/18/2018 Kristen Byrne https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180100715722

9/18/2018 Kristin Moriarty-Termunde https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180161422148

9/18/2018 Lamont G. McClure, Northampton County Executive https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918299947818

9/18/2018 Leon Towarnicki, City of Martinsville, VA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918163720332

9/18/2018 Linda Dance https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918172896723

9/18/2018 Linda Dance, Raymond Stalker https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918146570272

9/18/2018 Ling Wang https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918678413490

9/18/2018 Margo Warminski, Cincinnati Preservation Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918035367648



























Add. 21


9/18/2018 MARIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AGENCY (MTA) https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918964413670

9/18/2018 Mary Beth Brangan, EON https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918261393121

9/18/2018 Maryland Municipal League https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918268723794

9/18/2018 Max Ventura https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091842595075

9/18/2018 Max Ventura https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918177236910

9/18/2018 Mayor Allison Silberberg,City of Alexandria, Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918601603989

9/18/2018 Mayor Andrew J. Ginther https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918117640267

9/18/2018

Mayor Tom Barrett,Ashanti Hamilton,Robert Bauman,Michael Murphy,Jose Perez,Terry Witkowski https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109181161424056

9/18/2018 Montgomery County Chapter of the Maryland Municipal League https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091841909409

9/18/2018 Nan Whaley, Mayor of Dayton, Ohio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918397519290

9/18/2018

Nancy Joseph,John Joseph,brittany Joseph,alivia joseph,Nolan Joseph,Barb Bresson,Linda Kurz,Denise Pickett,Chantal Woods https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091875067115

9/18/2018 Natalie Ventrice https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918796510864

9/18/2018 Natalie Ventrice https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109182224103874

9/18/2018 Nevada League of Cities and Municipalities https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109182484001351

9/18/2018 New York State Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918351622225

9/18/2018 North Dakota Association of Counties https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091873501366

9/18/2018 North Metro Telecommunications Commission https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918339911030

9/18/2018 Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091808789180

9/18/2018 Norton City Council https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918967122464





















Add. 22


9/18/2018 NYC Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091989140436

9/18/2018 Ohio Municipal League https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091841732958

9/18/2018 paska gjonaj https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091885898022

9/18/2018 Paul Silver https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918295566037

9/18/2018 Peggy Heglund https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109181287004276

9/18/2018 Pennsylvanians Against Smart Meters https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091970274808

9/18/2018 Peter T Beaudry, II,Pierre Beaudry https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091805418396

9/18/2018 Peter Thomas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918135596811

9/18/2018 R Blake Crosby https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918006426994

9/18/2018 Rachael Arndt https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091892704315

9/18/2018 Rachael Arndt https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918065678546

9/18/2018 Rebecca Carol Smith https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918281421169

9/18/2018 Rebecca Carol Smith https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918028586050

9/18/2018 REBECCA CAROL SMITH https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918445124182

9/18/2018 Renville County https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918085330735

9/18/2018 Sarah Reilly https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918028917580

9/18/2018 Scott J Compton https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109190164425295

9/18/2018 Scott J Compton https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192855630795

9/18/2018 Sharon Schrader https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918806602953

9/18/2018 Sheila Hemphill https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091831496113

9/18/2018 Sheila Pomaranski https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109193012913542

9/18/2018 Sheila Pomaranski https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919241890431

9/18/2018 SmartWorks Partners,Angela Stacy https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091941692836

9/18/2018 Southeast Council of Governments https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918162642523

9/18/2018 St. Lucie County, Florida https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918008515510

9/18/2018 Steven V. Ponto, Mayor City of Brookfield https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918559509826

9/18/2018 Terrie Burns https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091896211794





























Add. 23


9/18/2018

The Ohio Mayors Alliance,Mayor John Cranley,Mayor Tim DeGeeter,Mayor Andrew Ginther,Mayor Don Patterson,Mayor Lydia Mihalik,Mayor Larry Mulligan Jr.,Mayor Nan Whaley https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918304953038

9/18/2018 Todd Levent https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109180673630106

9/18/2018 Town of Cortland Illinois https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918140248078

9/18/2018 Village of Elk Grove Village, IL https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091864270016

9/18/2018 Wendi Sue https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918206634206

9/18/2018 West Valley City, Utah https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919902707967

9/18/2018 Winifred Thomas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10918674117105

9/19/2018 5G Americas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919867226618

9/19/2018 5G Americas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919278553404


9/19/2018 Andrew P. Fox https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919250823413

9/19/2018 Ann Lindstrom https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919429524114

9/19/2018 Association County Commissioners of Georgia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109191360516070

9/19/2018 Association of Minnesota Counties https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919573013122


9/19/2018 Baker County,William Harvey,Mark Bennett,Burce Nichols https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919071767409

9/19/2018 Board of County Commissioners, Sublette County, Wyoming https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919058769514

9/19/2018 Board of Supervisors of Montgomery County Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091977464598

9/19/2018 Board of Supervisors of Montgomery County Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919236758421





















Add. 24


9/19/2018

Bob Kunau,Tim Darrington,Paul Christensen,Board of Cassia County Idaho Commissioners https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109190920603172

9/19/2018 Botetourt County, Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10920167715379

9/19/2018 Broward County, Florida https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919098025505

9/19/2018 Burnsville Mayor Elizabeth B. Kautz,City of Burnsville, Minn. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109191494020042

9/19/2018 Butte County Board of Supervisors https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10920234361299

9/19/2018 California Emerging Technology Fund https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092045808349

9/19/2018 Centre County Goverment (PA) https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091982359935

9/19/2018 Charles Glass https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091990144733

9/19/2018 Charles Iley https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109191771906246

9/19/2018 City of Anna https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109190885004928

9/19/2018 City of Brookville https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919042205711

9/19/2018 City of Chicago https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919756804686

9/19/2018 City of Chula Vista https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091934155301

9/19/2018 City of College Park, Georgia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092789854729

9/19/2018 City of Coon Rapids, Minnesota https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109191209423210

9/19/2018 City Of Cortland https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109191075614853

9/19/2018 City of Cuyahoga Falls https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109191486426676

9/19/2018 City of Eugene, Oregon https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919094010886

9/19/2018 City of Foster City https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192018521139

9/19/2018 City of Fredericksburg, Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091979890429

9/19/2018 City of Hayward, CA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919241404693

9/19/2018 City of Kent https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919086526015

9/19/2018 City of Las Vegas, NV https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919199282424


9/19/2018 City of Los Angeles, California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091933119375



























Add. 25

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/19/2018 City of McKinney, Texas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919175504165

9/19/2018 City of Medina, Ohio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192462330417

9/19/2018 City of Mount Vernon https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192835511651

9/19/2018 City of Olmos Park https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919409411372

9/19/2018 City of Overland Park, Kansas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109190549905790

9/19/2018 City of Palmdale https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092050227863

9/19/2018 City of Petaluma https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092052109816

9/19/2018 City of Rockville, Maryland https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109190999203047

9/19/2018 City of Roseville, California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109202537808947

9/19/2018 City of Santa Maria, California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092095095564

9/19/2018 City of South St. Paul, Minnesota https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919078028111

9/19/2018 City Of Virginia Beach https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109272103221094

9/19/2018 City of Yuma, Arizona https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091932758263

9/19/2018 Colorado Communications and Utility Alliance (CCUA) https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091966485794

9/19/2018

Commissioner Don Hodge,Judge Dan P. Joyce,Commissioner Larry Wilson,Malheur County https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919624310681

9/19/2018 Competitive Carriers Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10920265430210

9/19/2018 Cooke County, Texas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091967824895

9/19/2018 Councilman Bill Hollander https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919309631921

9/19/2018 County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919153585708

9/19/2018 County Legislator John Lightfoot https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091951915636

9/19/2018 County of Augusta, VA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919914706931

9/19/2018 County of Cumberland https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919167986612

9/19/2018 County of Fresno https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919691705898

9/19/2018 County of Imperial https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919908116253


























Add. 26

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/19/2018 County of Monterey, CA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919335500999

9/19/2018 County of Sacramento https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10920815418249

9/19/2018 County of San Diego https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919647103556

9/19/2018 County of Warren, Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919235846284

9/19/2018 Crown Castle https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109190528109841


9/19/2018 Cty of San Antonio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109202756204608

9/19/2018 Dan Langshaw https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10927202782725

9/19/2018 Dane County https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919111805711

9/19/2018 Dave Pine https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919135714229

9/19/2018 Diane J. Martinez https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919263913390

9/19/2018 Duchesne County https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919168094217

9/19/2018 Eric Maxwell https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109190565619987

9/19/2018 Erie County NY https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109191556806555

9/19/2018 Gloucester County, Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092058190290

9/19/2018 Granville County, North Carolina https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919160096176

9/19/2018 Greater Bexar County Council of Cities https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919417110800

9/19/2018 Harney County,Pete Runnels,Mark Owens,Patty Dorroh https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091979091600

9/19/2018 Hennepin County https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919060501161

9/19/2018 Howard County, Maryland https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091967496576

9/19/2018 Hubert Beck https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919399206165

9/19/2018 Humboldt County, CA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10920707125469

9/19/2018 INCOMPAS https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10920007086830

9/19/2018 James E. Baker, City Manager, City of Chesapeake https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919970615961

9/19/2018 Jo Daviess County https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091992148369

9/19/2018 Kaley Schultze https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919335902414




























Add. 27

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/19/2018 Kimball County Nebraska https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919671111048

9/19/2018 Kimball County Nebraska https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919562528387

9/19/2018 Kurt Triplett, City Manager, City of Kirkland https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109191802105422

9/19/2018 Latah County Planning Department https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919025549936

9/19/2018 Latinos in Information Sciemces and Technology Association, Jose Marquez https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919487317899

9/19/2018 Los Angeles County https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919246717985

9/19/2018 Loudoun County https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919931717650

9/19/2018 Martin J. Bilek https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919720616768

9/19/2018 Mary B. Bunting, City Manager, City of Hampton, VA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192639324006

9/19/2018 Maryland Association of Counties (MACo) https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919149008217

9/19/2018 Maureen Davey https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091958735124

9/19/2018 Mayor Greg Fischer,Louisville Metro Government https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919796409517

9/19/2018 Mayor Henry Wilson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919135208764

9/19/2018 Mayor John Cranley, City of Cincinnati https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919131524220

9/19/2018 Mayor Victoria Woodards https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919117530402

9/19/2018 Michael Dylan Brennan https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919486815220

9/19/2018 Monroe County, Florida https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919133249084

9/19/2018 Morgan County Commission https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109191063913927

9/19/2018 National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109193017613140

9/19/2018

National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors,National League of Cities,United States Conference of Mayors,National Association of Counties,National Association of Regional Councils https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919028495631






















Add. 28

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/19/2018 National Association of Towns and Townships https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192612023425

9/19/2018

National Rural Health Association,American Telemedicine Association,National Association of Rural Health Clinics https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919031725561


9/19/2018 Orange County, CA Board of Supervisors https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919390216999

9/19/2018 Patrick Bloomingdale https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919062311302

9/19/2018 Prince George County, VA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092731541703

9/19/2018 Prince William County, Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109202851108466

9/19/2018 Queen Anne's County Maryland Board of County Commissioners https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192501630598

9/19/2018 Ricardo Ramirez https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109190429901735

9/19/2018 Robert DeArmond,Scott Blain https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919151083814

9/19/2018 Robert L. Hosack https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109190276614653

9/19/2018 Rural County Representatives of California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919689409608

9/19/2018 San Francisco, City and County https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192605411402

9/19/2018 Sean Lanier, PE, CFM https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919081376496

9/19/2018 Seattle City Light,Seattle Department of Transportation,City of Seattle https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109191163507187


9/19/2018 South Washington County Telecommunications Commission https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919598922474

9/19/2018 Starry, Inc. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091939027342

9/19/2018 Steve Willis https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192607027779

9/19/2018 Steve Willis https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109190102107061

9/19/2018 The City of Philadelphia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091977459223

9/19/2018 The City of Philadelphia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192671202479
























Add. 29


9/19/2018

Thomas C. Lamar, Commission Chair,David McGraw, Commissioner,Richard Walser, Commissioner https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919233599955

9/19/2018 T-Mobile USA, Inc. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109201893527990

9/19/2018

Town of Danville, California,City of Dublin, California,City of Livermore, California,City of Pleasanton, California,City of San Ramon, California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092088469705

9/19/2018

Town of Danville, California,City of Dublin, California,City of Livermore, California,City of Pleasanton, California,City of San Ramon, California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092072849388

9/19/2018 Urban Counties of California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109192799617715


9/19/2018 Village of Hoffman Estates https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091999375214

9/19/2018 Village of Lake Success https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919477416988

9/19/2018 Washington Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisers (WATOA) https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1091967601406

9/19/2018 Washington Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919100452510

9/19/2018 Waukesha County https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919254752595


9/19/2018 XG Communities, LLC https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092030930452

9/19/2018 Yellowstone County,John Ostlund,Denis Pitman,Robyn Driscoll https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10919231529039

9/20/2018 AT&T https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109202453507383

9/20/2018 City of Lakewood, California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092009131472

9/20/2018 City of Whitehall https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109272219007399



















Add. 30


9/20/2018 Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10920245738967


9/20/2018 Deloitte Consulting LLP https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092061903608

9/20/2018 Karen Mitchoff https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092018453620

9/20/2018 Kentucky Association of Counties https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092058270600

9/20/2018 Kevin Watson https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10920173146463

9/20/2018 NCTA https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109201697409943

9/20/2018 RainbowPUSH https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10920388125556

9/20/2018 Stephen F. Owen https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092008425193

9/20/2018 Village of Gates Mills https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109200674326734

9/21/2018 City of Murrieta, California https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10921285507629

9/21/2018 Elizabeth Shapiro https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10921272058147

9/21/2018 Elizabeth Shapiro https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10921726312351

9/21/2018 Michael L. Beamish, Mayor, City of Troy, OH https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10921253100587

9/21/2018 Town of Middleburg, Virginia https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092166849166

9/24/2018 Cathy Murillo,City of Santa Barbara https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109241131921310

9/24/2018 City of Gahanna https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1002038924516

9/24/2018 Hope Water &Light https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109242216109904

9/24/2018 Paul Smith https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10924144282163

9/24/2018 Randal Barrett https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109240977414768


9/25/2018 Arkansas Municipal Power Association https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925292808657

9/25/2018 C Barnes https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925005615911

9/25/2018 caroline thrun https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092679432003

9/25/2018 Catherine E. Pugh, Mayor, City of Baltimore https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925290414482

9/25/2018 City of Bentonville, Arkansas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092506860249

9/25/2018 City of North Little Rock https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925006646956





























Add. 31

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/25/2018 City,Conway,Arkansas https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925671213298

9/25/2018 Clarksville Light & Water Company https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925665019722

9/25/2018 Cynthia Curtis https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925824917630

9/25/2018 Dan Schoenberg https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925029652014

9/25/2018 Dan Schoenberg https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925129212969

9/25/2018 Kim E Levinsohn and Marla Levinsohn https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10926086672342

9/25/2018 Mark & Lorene Newood https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925073153649

9/25/2018 Marla Levinsohn https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109261347516960

9/25/2018 National Governors Association,National Conference of State Legislatures https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925081485126

9/25/2018 Nicholas LiCalzi https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925715614502

9/25/2018 Sandra Betten https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10925260776430

9/25/2018

The Honorable Billy Long,The Honorable Fred Upton,The Honorable Susan W. Brooks,The Honorable Gregg Harper,The Honorable Lynn Jenkins, CPA,The Honorable Kevin Yoder,The Honorable Brian Babin,The Honorable Tim Walberg,The Honorable Ron Estes,The Honorable Bill Johnson,The Honorable Robert E. Latta,The Honorable John Ratcliffe,The Honorable Ryan Costello,The Honorable David B. McKinley,The Honorable John Curtis,The Honorable John Shimkus,The Honorable Brett Guthrie,The Honorable Adam Kinzinger,The Honorable Blaine Luetkemeyer,The Honorable Mark Walker,The Honorable Gus Bilirakis,The Honorable Larry Bucshon, M.D.,The Honorable Jeff Duncan,The Honorable Michael C. Burgess, M.D.,The Honorable Tom Emmer https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092585347000














Add. 32

Date Received Filer Name(s) Link to Submission 9/26/2018 City of Benton, AR https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109260394411399

9/26/2018 City of Hudson, Ohio https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109260289311995

9/26/2018 Laura Basso https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109270127326030

9/26/2018 Office of Media Relations https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/09261819619664

9/26/2018 Pamela Wallace https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10926091508108

9/26/2018 wim ney https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/109262905606086

9/27/2018 Town of Middleburg https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/100470957004

9/27/2018 Village of Glenwillow https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/10040070230463

9/27/2018 Wireline Competition Bureau https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/0927025585935











Documents

No. 18-9563 (and other cases listed inside cover) IN THE ... · No. 18-9563 (and other cases listed inside cover) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT . S