34
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Nifty Home Products, Inc. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action #:_____________ Big Lots Stores, Inc. Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Nifty Home Products, Inc. (“Nifty”), for its Complaint against Defendant Big Lots Stores, Inc. (“Big Lots”), states and alleges as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Nifty is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business in Madison Lake, Minnesota. Nifty designs and sells a variety of kitchen accessories. 2. Defendant Big Lots, on information and belief, is an Ohio corporation having its corporate headquarters in Columbus, Ohio. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This is a claim of patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281-285. 4. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter over Nifty’s federal claims by virtue of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) and (b). 5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over defendant Big Lots, as Big Lots has engaged in acts of patent infringement in the United States and in the District of Minnesota. Defendant Big Lots regularly does business in the state of Minnesota by distributing its products in Big Lots stores operating in the United States, including Minnesota. Big Lots allows CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 1 of 7

Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

Citation preview

Page 1: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Nifty Home Products, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action #:_____________ Big Lots Stores, Inc.

Defendant.

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Nifty Home Products, Inc. (“Nifty”), for its Complaint against Defendant Big

Lots Stores, Inc. (“Big Lots”), states and alleges as follows:

PARTIES

1. Plaintiff Nifty is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business in

Madison Lake, Minnesota. Nifty designs and sells a variety of kitchen accessories.

2. Defendant Big Lots, on information and belief, is an Ohio corporation having its

corporate headquarters in Columbus, Ohio.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

3. This is a claim of patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281-285.

4. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter over Nifty’s federal claims by

virtue of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) and (b).

5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over defendant Big Lots, as Big Lots has

engaged in acts of patent infringement in the United States and in the District of Minnesota.

Defendant Big Lots regularly does business in the state of Minnesota by distributing its products

in Big Lots stores operating in the United States, including Minnesota. Big Lots allows

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 1 of 7

Page 2: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

2

Minnesota customers to purchase infringing products in Big Lots stores located in Minnesota.

Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) as defendant Big Lots has committed acts of

infringement in this District.

PATENTS-IN-SUIT

6. On or about February 20, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office

(“USPTO”) issued U.S. Design Patent D536,936 (“the ‘936 Patent”) for the “Single Cup

Beverage Container Holder” to Frank Tiemann based on an application filed on or about January

5, 2006. The ‘936 Patent was assigned to Nifty. A copy of the ‘936 Patent is attached to this

Complaint as Exhibit 1.

7. On or about February 9, 2010, the USPTO issued U.S. Design Patent D609,533

(“the ‘533 Patent”) for “Coffee Pod Carousel” to Frank Tiemann based on an application filed on

or about March 10, 2009. The ‘533 Patent is assigned to Nifty. A copy of the ‘533 Patent is

attached to this Complaint as Exhibit 2

8. On or about May 22, 2012, the USPTO issued U.S. Design Patent D660,088 (“the

‘088 Patent”) for a “Drawer For Holding Beverage Cartridges” to Frank Tiemann based on an

application filed on or about Feb 23, 2011. The ‘088 Patent is assigned to Nifty. A copy of the

‘088 Patent is attached as Exhibit 3.

9. On or about April 1, 2014, the USPTO issued U.S. Design Patent D701,733 (“the

‘733 Patent”) for a “Drawer for Holding Beverage Cartridges” to Frank Tiemann based on an

application filed on or about October 19, 2012. The ‘733 Patent is assigned to Nifty. A copy of

the ‘733 Patent is attached as Exhibit 4.

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 2 of 7

Page 3: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

3

BACKGROUND

10. Nifty has been selling its patented beverage cartridge carousels and drawers

directly to consumers, and wholesale to a variety of retailers, since at least 2006. Nifty’s

patented products have been marked with their individual patent numbers.

11. In late 2014, Nifty became aware that Big Lots was offering for sale and selling in

its retail stores a coffee pod carousel which infringes the ‘936 and ‘533 Patents. The infringing

coffee pod carousel is sold by Big Lots under the “GREAT GATHERINGS” trademark.

12. GREAT GATHERINGS is a registered trademark of Consolidated Property

Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation having its principal place of business at 330 East Warm

Springs Road, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119. According to a Notice of Opposition filed collectively

by Big Lots and Consolidated Property Holdings, Inc., Consolidated Property Holdings, Inc.

owns the intellectual property used by Big Lots.

13. Nifty purchased the GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee Pod Carousel from the Big

Lots store located at 10590 France Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431-3538. The

packaging for the GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee Pod Carousel indicates that Big Lots is the

distributor of the GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee Pod Carousel, and that the GREAT

GATHERINGS Coffee Pod Carousel is imported by Big Lots from China.

14. Nifty also discovered in late 2014 that Big Lots was offering for sale and selling

in its retail stores a coffee pod drawer under the GREAT GATHERINGS trademark which

infringes the ‘088 and ‘733 Patents.

15. Nifty purchased the GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee Pod Drawer from the

Bloomington, Minnesota Big Lots store. The packaging for the GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee

Pod Drawer indicates that Big Lots is the distributor of the GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee Pod

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 3 of 7

Page 4: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

4

Drawer and that the GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee Pod Drawer is imported by Big Lots from

China.

COUNT I (PATENT INFRINGEMENT – ‘936 PATENT)

16. The allegations of Paragraphs 1 to 15 of the Complaint are re-alleged and

incorporated herein by reference.

17. Big Lots has infringed and continues to infringe the ‘936 Patent by offering to sell

and selling in the United States, and importing into the United States, without Nifty’s

authorization, coffee pod carousels that are substantially the same as the design illustrated and

described in the ‘936 Patent. The resemblance between Nifty’s patented Single Cup Beverage

Container Holder and Big Lots’ unauthorized GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee Pod Carousel is

such as to permit an ordinary observer to purchase the unauthorized GREAT GATHERINGS

Coffee Pod Carousel supposing it to be the Nifty Single Cup Beverage Container Holder.

18. Big Lots’ actions have caused, and will continue to cause, irreparable harm to

Nifty unless enjoined.

19. Big Lots’ infringement of the ‘936 Patent has been willful and deliberate, and

undertaken despite knowledge of the ‘936 Patent.

COUNT II (PATENT INFRINGEMENT – ‘533 PATENT)

20. The allegations of Paragraphs 1 to 19 of the Complaint are re-alleged and

incorporated herein by reference.

21. Big Lots has infringed and continues to infringe the ‘533 Patent by offering to sell

and selling in the United States, and importing into the United States, without Nifty’s

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 4 of 7

Page 5: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

5

authorization, coffee pod carousels that are substantially the same as the design illustrated and

described in the ‘936 Patent. The resemblance between Nifty’s patented Coffee Pod Carousel

and Big Lots’ unauthorized GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee Pod Carousel is such as to permit an

ordinary observer to purchase the unauthorized GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee Pod Carousel

supposing it to be the Nifty Coffee Pod Carousel.

22. Big Lots’ actions have caused, and will continue to cause, irreparable harm to

Nifty unless enjoined.

23. Big Lots’ infringement of the ‘533 Patent has been willful and deliberate, and

undertaken despite knowledge of the ‘533 Patent.

COUNT III (PATENT INFRINGEMENT – ‘088 PATENT)

24. The allegations of Paragraphs 1 to 23 of the Complaint are re-alleged and

incorporated herein by reference.

25. Big Lots has infringed and continues to infringe the ‘088 Patent by offering to sell

and selling in the United States, and importing into the United States, without Nifty’s

authorization, coffee pod drawers that are substantially the same as the design illustrated and

described in the ‘088 Patent. The resemblance between Nifty’s patented Drawer For Holding

Beverage Cartridges and Big Lots’ unauthorized GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee Pod Drawer is

such as to permit an ordinary observer to purchase the unauthorized GREAT GATHERINGS

Coffee Pod Drawer supposing it to be the Nifty Drawer For Holding Beverage Cartridges.

26. Big Lots’ actions have caused, and will continue to cause, irreparable harm to

Nifty unless enjoined.

27. Big Lots’ infringement of the ‘088 Patent has been willful and deliberate, and

undertaken despite knowledge of the ‘088 Patent.

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 5 of 7

Page 6: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

6

COUNT IV (PATENT INFRINGEMENT – ‘733 PATENT)

28. The allegations of Paragraphs 1 to 27 of the Complaint are re-alleged and

incorporated herein by reference.

29. Big Lots has infringed and continues to infringe the ‘088 Patent by offering to sell

and selling in the United States, and importing into the United States, without Nifty’s

authorization, coffee pod drawers that are substantially the same as the design illustrated and

described in the ‘088 Patent. The resemblance between Nifty’s patented Drawer For Holding

Beverage Cartridges and Big Lots’ unauthorized GREAT GATHERINGS Coffee Pod Drawer is

such as to permit an ordinary observer to purchase the unauthorized GREAT GATHERINGS

Coffee Pod Drawer supposing it to be the Nifty Drawer For Holding Beverage Cartridges.

30. Big Lots’ actions have caused, and will continue to cause, irreparable harm to

Nifty unless enjoined.

31. Big Lots’ infringement of the ‘088 Patent has been willful and deliberate, and

undertaken despite knowledge of the ‘088 Patent.

DEMAND

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Nifty prays for judgment as follows:

(a) In favor of Nifty and against Big Lots on all counts of the Complaint.

(b) Preliminarily and permanently enjoining and restraining Big Lots, its officers, directors,

agents, servants, employees, attorneys, affiliated companies and all others acting under or

through them, from directly infringing or inducing others to infringe U.S. Design Patents

D536,936; D609,533; D660,088; and D701,733.

(c) Awarding Nifty damages under 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and 289, including Big Lots’ profits

and treble damages for willful infringement.

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 6 of 7

Page 7: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

7

(d) Awarding Nifty’s reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, and interest pursuant to 35

U.S.C. § 285 and other applicable law.

(e) Awarding Nifty such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

JURY DEMAND

Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of all issues so triable.

Date: December 12, 2014 s/Peter G. Nikolai/ Peter G. Nikolai (#322,052)

James T. Nikolai (#144,101) NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU, P.A 900 Second Avenue South, Suite 1550 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 339-7461 Facsimile: (612) 349-6556

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF NIFTY HOME PRODUCTS, INC.

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 7 of 7

Page 8: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

EXHIBIT 1

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 1 of 6

Page 9: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 2 of 6

Page 10: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 3 of 6

Page 11: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 4 of 6

Page 12: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 5 of 6

Page 13: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 6 of 6

Page 14: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

EXHIBIT 2

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-2 Filed 12/12/14 Page 1 of 6

Page 15: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-2 Filed 12/12/14 Page 2 of 6

Page 16: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-2 Filed 12/12/14 Page 3 of 6

Page 17: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-2 Filed 12/12/14 Page 4 of 6

Page 18: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-2 Filed 12/12/14 Page 5 of 6

Page 19: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-2 Filed 12/12/14 Page 6 of 6

Page 20: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

EXHIBIT 3

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-3 Filed 12/12/14 Page 1 of 6

Page 21: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-3 Filed 12/12/14 Page 2 of 6

Page 22: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-3 Filed 12/12/14 Page 3 of 6

Page 23: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-3 Filed 12/12/14 Page 4 of 6

Page 24: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-3 Filed 12/12/14 Page 5 of 6

Page 25: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-3 Filed 12/12/14 Page 6 of 6

Page 26: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

EXHIBIT 4

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-4 Filed 12/12/14 Page 1 of 7

Page 27: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-4 Filed 12/12/14 Page 2 of 7

Page 28: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-4 Filed 12/12/14 Page 3 of 7

Page 29: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-4 Filed 12/12/14 Page 4 of 7

Page 30: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-4 Filed 12/12/14 Page 5 of 7

Page 31: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-4 Filed 12/12/14 Page 6 of 7

Page 32: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-4 Filed 12/12/14 Page 7 of 7

Page 33: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

JS 44 (Rev. 12/12) CIVIL COVER SHEETThe JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except asprovided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for thepurpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS

(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff County of Residence of First Listed Defendant(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)

NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)

II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)

’ 1 U.S. Government ’ 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEFPlaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State ’ 1 ’ 1 Incorporated or Principal Place ’ 4 ’ 4

of Business In This State

’ 2 U.S. Government ’ 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State ’ 2 ’ 2 Incorporated and Principal Place ’ 5 ’ 5Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State

Citizen or Subject of a ’ 3 ’ 3 Foreign Nation ’ 6 ’ 6 Foreign Country

IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “X” in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES

’ 110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY ’ 625 Drug Related Seizure ’ 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 ’ 375 False Claims Act’ 120 Marine ’ 310 Airplane ’ 365 Personal Injury - of Property 21 USC 881 ’ 423 Withdrawal ’ 400 State Reapportionment’ 130 Miller Act ’ 315 Airplane Product Product Liability ’ 690 Other 28 USC 157 ’ 410 Antitrust’ 140 Negotiable Instrument Liability ’ 367 Health Care/ ’ 430 Banks and Banking’ 150 Recovery of Overpayment ’ 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS ’ 450 Commerce

& Enforcement of Judgment Slander Personal Injury ’ 820 Copyrights ’ 460 Deportation’ 151 Medicare Act ’ 330 Federal Employers’ Product Liability ’ 830 Patent ’ 470 Racketeer Influenced and’ 152 Recovery of Defaulted Liability ’ 368 Asbestos Personal ’ 840 Trademark Corrupt Organizations

Student Loans ’ 340 Marine Injury Product ’ 480 Consumer Credit (Excludes Veterans) ’ 345 Marine Product Liability LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY ’ 490 Cable/Sat TV

’ 153 Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY ’ 710 Fair Labor Standards ’ 861 HIA (1395ff) ’ 850 Securities/Commodities/ of Veteran’s Benefits ’ 350 Motor Vehicle ’ 370 Other Fraud Act ’ 862 Black Lung (923) Exchange

’ 160 Stockholders’ Suits ’ 355 Motor Vehicle ’ 371 Truth in Lending ’ 720 Labor/Management ’ 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) ’ 890 Other Statutory Actions’ 190 Other Contract Product Liability ’ 380 Other Personal Relations ’ 864 SSID Title XVI ’ 891 Agricultural Acts’ 195 Contract Product Liability ’ 360 Other Personal Property Damage ’ 740 Railway Labor Act ’ 865 RSI (405(g)) ’ 893 Environmental Matters’ 196 Franchise Injury ’ 385 Property Damage ’ 751 Family and Medical ’ 895 Freedom of Information

’ 362 Personal Injury - Product Liability Leave Act Act Medical Malpractice ’ 790 Other Labor Litigation ’ 896 Arbitration

REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS ’ 791 Employee Retirement FEDERAL TAX SUITS ’ 899 Administrative Procedure’ 210 Land Condemnation ’ 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: Income Security Act ’ 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff Act/Review or Appeal of ’ 220 Foreclosure ’ 441 Voting ’ 463 Alien Detainee or Defendant) Agency Decision’ 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment ’ 442 Employment ’ 510 Motions to Vacate ’ 871 IRS—Third Party ’ 950 Constitutionality of’ 240 Torts to Land ’ 443 Housing/ Sentence 26 USC 7609 State Statutes’ 245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations ’ 530 General’ 290 All Other Real Property ’ 445 Amer. w/Disabilities - ’ 535 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION

Employment Other: ’ 462 Naturalization Application’ 446 Amer. w/Disabilities - ’ 540 Mandamus & Other ’ 465 Other Immigration

Other ’ 550 Civil Rights Actions’ 448 Education ’ 555 Prison Condition

’ 560 Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement

V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only)

’ 1 OriginalProceeding

’ 2 Removed fromState Court

’ 3 Remanded fromAppellate Court

’ 4 Reinstated orReopened

’ 5 Transferred fromAnother District(specify)

’ 6 MultidistrictLitigation

VI. CAUSE OF ACTION

Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): Brief description of cause:

VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT:

’ CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTIONUNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P.

DEMAND $ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:JURY DEMAND: ’ Yes ’ No

VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY (See instructions):

JUDGE DOCKET NUMBERDATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-5 Filed 12/12/14 Page 1 of 2

Page 34: Nifty Home Products v. Big Lots - Complaint

JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 12/12)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44

Authority For Civil Cover Sheet

The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers asrequired by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, isrequired for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk ofCourt for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:

I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and then the official, giving both name and title.

(b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)

(c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, notingin this section "(see attachment)".

II. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X" in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity cases.)

III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark thissection for each principal party.

IV. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below, is sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more than one nature of suit, select the most definitive.

V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the six boxes.Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts.Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box.Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing date.Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date.Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or multidistrict litigation transfers.Multidistrict Litigation. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1407. When this box is checked, do not check (5) above.

VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service

VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.

VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.

Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.

CASE 0:14-cv-04985 Document 1-5 Filed 12/12/14 Page 2 of 2