Upload
yelena
View
25
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
News and Miscellaneous UPO Apr 05 2013 Didier Contardo , Jeff Spalding. Test Beams 2014 CMS Week (next week) Phase 1 Scrutiny Document to RRB Cost Exercise for Phase 2 HL-LHC PU DESY week agenda ECFA working groups. Test Beams at CERN. From Laza [email protected] - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
News and MiscellaneousUPO Apr 05 2013Didier Contardo, Jeff Spalding
o Test Beams 2014o CMS Week (next week)o Phase 1 Scrutinyo Document to RRB Cost Exercise for Phase 2o HL-LHC PUo DESY week agendao ECFA working groups
2Test Beams at CERN
From Laza [email protected]
o There are no CERN test (or any other) beams in 2013
o In 2014 PS physics will start in mid-August and SPS in mid-October
More information, such as where outside CERN can you get some test beam time in 2013, can be found in CMS Test Beam Web page: http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/testbeam/www/Welcome.html
3Upgrade Meetings during CMS Week
– CMS plenary Monday afternoon• Phase 1 Upgrades J. Mans • Ideas, plans and needs for Phase 2 F. Chlebana
– Upgrade plenary Wednesday afternoon
– WG/TF meetings
4Phase 1 Scrutiny
o CERN is setting up a Scrutiny Group for the Phase 1 Upgrades. This will be a separate group from the existing M&O-B Scrutiny Group
o The group reports to the RRB. First report will probably be in Sep (for Oct RRB). Scrutiny could be in July
o As for M&O-B, Andrzej will establish an internal scrutiny process
Need to establish internal and external reporting tables for cost and milestones.
o Initial cost exercise was very instructive (DRAFT document NOT submitted)
o Informing the RRB this meeting of our process: scope evaluation describe full upgrade program with cost estimate in TP(2014), then each project in TDR(~2016)
We need to develop a framework for the cost exercise– FA’s are already asking for the cost scale. It is very likely that we will be asked to present
cost information before the TP, perhaps by September– We need a framework for including cost into the scope deliberations: now through
summer 2014
Phase 2 Cost Exercise
5Phase 2 Cost Framework
Needed by September
o A working cost matrix for estimating costs allowing inter-related choices of scope– Need to internally scrutinize cost estimates– We need a working version by June. How do we get there? – Process cannot be “public” until we have made some assessment of the upgrade scope
and decided how to present
o And a way of summarizing for public domain
Needed by early 2014
o A funding matrix (hopefully not the same as the Phase 1 MM)– Understand better the relationship between projects and common items– Build it from the projects first, then from voluntary pledges?
Proposed a new subgroup of the FB to discuss both
6HL-LHC PU
o Ongoing discussions between UC in CMS and Atlas, plus Mike Hildreth (CMS) and Beate Heinemann (Atlas), Mike Lamont (LHC)
o Atlas has been quoting and using 140 for <PU> at HL-LHC for 5E34 … this seems high– They use inelastic cross-section 85 mb (which is ~1s high in projections to 14 TeV), and
then round up to 140 from 134
o We estimate a central value of 126 (which is 25 at 1E34)– Central value is a little under 79.3 mb (+/-5)
o Bunch-to-bunch variation may make the average ~5% higher for some crossings and lower for others (to be quantified from 2012 data)
o The choice of leveling value is up to the experiments. 5E34 is the “nominal” and we must simulate it. We should also study a higher value: 7 or 8E34?
o While the text should explain the central value, studies can use higher values
o More discussion to follow, with a specific proposal
7DESY Week
Monday-Friday June 3-7
DESY, Hamburg
Block timetable & travel information are on the web site. More details to follow.
http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=236161
o Will include an Upgrade MB and a CB
o Will have a poster session, CINCO link bellow
https://cms-mgt-conferences.web.cern.ch/cms-mgt-conferences/conferences/conf_display.aspx?cid=
1160
Registration is open since Mar. 1
8
Monday and Tuesday
Monday
o The HI-LHC physics program
o Benchmark channels for guiding scope choices
o What guidance can we get from gen. level & simulation of [aging] Phase 1 detector?
Tuesday
o Parallel
Emphasis is on Phase 2 Scope
reports and some working meetings for Phase 1
9Wednesday
Detector Longevity
o What detectors/systems MUST be replaced when?
o Including electronics, DAQ…
o And TC considerations
o Answers to specific questions
10
Thursday and
Friday
o Complete system survey w/Trigger
o Straw man concepts for next round of studies
HL-LHC ECFA workshop Oct. 1-3 201311
o Goal of the workshop– Develop a common approach to the HL-LHC program, find synergies and coordinate efforts
in areas of common interest for the four experiments in the following areas:• Physics goals and reach – detector requirements and performance• Tracking devices and associated electronics and readout• Calorimetry and associated electronics and readout• Muon systems and associated electronics and readout• Trigger/DAQ/Offline/Computing• Accelerator and Experiment interfaces, LS constraints and radiation levels
o For each area, working groups with few representatives of all experiments and from CERN theory and accelerator divisions when relevant are being formed to prepare the workshop sessions
o The CMS contributions will be based on the current detector R&D work and the follow-up of the simulation studies to define the scope of phase 2 (as discussed at the DESY upgrade week). A major goal is to present first physics reach results with few physics benchmarks.