48
1 New lager brewery strains obtained by crossing techniques using cachaça 1 (Brazilian spirit) yeasts 2 3 Bruna Inez Carvalho Figueiredo 1, & , Margarete Alice Fontes Saraiva 1, & , Paloma Patrick de 4 Souza Pimenta 1 , Miriam Conceição de Souza Testasicca 2 , Geraldo Magela Santos 5 Sampaio 1 , Aureliano Claret da Cunha 1 , Luis Carlos Crocco Afonso 2 , Marisa Vieira de 6 Queiroz 3 , Ieso de Miranda Castro 1 , Rogelio Lopes Brandão 1# 7 8 1 Laboratório de Biologia Celular e Molecular, 2 Laboratório de Imunoparasitologia, Núcleo 9 de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, 10 Minas Gerais, Brazil, 3 Laboratório de Genética de Microrganismos, Departamento de 11 Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 12 13 & These authors contributed equally to this work. 14 15 # Correspondence should be addressed to Rogelio Lopes Brandão at Laboratório de 16 Biologia Celular e Molecular, Núcleo de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas, Universidade 17 Federal de Ouro Preto, Campus do Morro do Cruzeiro - 35.400-000. Ouro Preto, MG, 18 Brazil. Email: [email protected]. Tel: +55 31 3559 1680. 19 20 Running title: Lager brewery yeasts obtained by crossing techniques 21 22 AEM Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 4 August 2017 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.01582-17 Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. on February 1, 2019 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

New lager brewery strains obtained by crossing techniques using cachaça ...aem.asm.org/content/early/2017/07/31/AEM.01582-17.full.pdf · 8 143 M ATERIALS AND METHODS 144 Strains

  • Upload
    vannhu

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

New lager brewery strains obtained by crossing techniques using cachaça 1

(Brazilian spirit) yeasts 2

3

Bruna Inez Carvalho Figueiredo1, &

, Margarete Alice Fontes Saraiva1, &

, Paloma Patrick de 4

Souza Pimenta1, Miriam Conceição de Souza Testasicca

2, Geraldo Magela Santos 5

Sampaio1, Aureliano Claret da Cunha

1, Luis Carlos Crocco Afonso

2, Marisa Vieira de 6

Queiroz3, Ieso de Miranda Castro

1, Rogelio Lopes Brandão

1# 7

8

1Laboratório de Biologia Celular e Molecular,

2Laboratório de Imunoparasitologia, Núcleo 9

de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, 10

Minas Gerais, Brazil, 3Laboratório de Genética de Microrganismos, Departamento de 11

Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 12

13

&These authors contributed equally to this work. 14

15

#Correspondence should be addressed to Rogelio Lopes Brandão at Laboratório de 16

Biologia Celular e Molecular, Núcleo de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas, Universidade 17

Federal de Ouro Preto, Campus do Morro do Cruzeiro - 35.400-000. Ouro Preto, MG, 18

Brazil. Email: [email protected]. Tel: +55 31 3559 1680. 19

20

Running title: Lager brewery yeasts obtained by crossing techniques 21

22

AEM Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 4 August 2017Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.01582-17Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

2

ABSTRACT 23

The development of hybrids has been an effective approach to generate novel yeast strains 24

with optimal technological profile for use in beer production. This study describes the 25

generation of a new yeast strain for lager beer production by direct mating between two S. 26

cerevisiae strains isolated from cachaça distilleries: one strongly flocculent and other with 27

higher production of acetate esters. The first step toward this procedure was to analyze the 28

sporulation ability and reproductive cycle of the strains belonging to a specific collection of 29

yeasts isolated from cachaça fermentation vats. Most strains showed high rate of 30

sporulation, spore viability, and homothallic behavior. In order to get new yeast strains with 31

desirable properties useful for lager beer production, we compare haploid-to-haploid and 32

diploid-to-diploid mating procedures. Moreover, assessment of parental phenotype traits 33

showed that the segregant diploid C2-1d generated from diploid-to-diploid mating 34

experiment showed good fermentation performance at low temperature, high flocculation 35

capacity and desirable production of acetate esters that was significantly better than one 36

type lager strain. Thereby, the strain C2-1d might be an important candidate for the 37

production of lager beer with distinct fruit trace, originated from a non-GMO approach. 38

39

Keywords: Aroma volatile compounds; Beer; Flocculation; Hybrid; Mating type. 40

41

42

43

44

45

46

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

3

IMPORTANCE 47

48

Recent work has suggested the utilization of hybridization techniques for generation of 49

novel non-genetically modified brewing yeast strains with combined properties, not 50

commonly found in a unique yeast strain. We have observed remarkable traits, especially 51

low temperature tolerance, maltotriose utilization, flocculation ability and production of 52

volatile aroma compounds, among a collection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated 53

from cachaça distilleries, which allow their utilization in the production of beer. The 54

significance of our research is in the use of breeding/hybridization techniques to generate 55

yeast strains that would be appropriate to produce new lager beers by exploring the capacity 56

of cachaça yeast strains to flocculate and to ferment maltose at low temperature with the 57

concomitant production of flavoring compounds. 58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

4

INTRODUCTION 69

Alcoholic fermentation is a crucial step in the production of different beverages, 70

including beer, wine and spirits; in all these examples, it is carried out mainly by yeast. 71

There is quite a large variety of different yeast species that are able to ferment sugar into 72

ethanol; among them, those belonging to the genera Saccharomyces are used for bioethanol 73

production and dominate also wine, spirits and beer industry (46). 74

In general, to produce a high-quality beer, yeast must be effective in fermenting the 75

sugars from the wort (maltose, maltotriose and glucose); be able to tolerate high ethanol 76

levels and to produce desired aroma compounds (5). Moreover, two main beer styles can be 77

distinguished according to the species of yeast used: ale and lager beers. Ale beers are 78

produced by strains of S. cerevisiae, but lager beers are traditionally obtained by yeast 79

species that result from hybridization events between S. cerevisiae and non-cerevisiae that 80

were selected in conditions of low-temperature fermentations for beer production (23). 81

Beyond that, lager yeast also presents another interesting feature: the ability to flocculate 82

that leads cells to the setting at the bottom of the fermentation tank, enabling easy removal 83

and re-inoculation; in contrast, ale yeast rises to the surface (46). 84

An additional and important difference between lager and ale strains is related to the 85

capacity to produce different types and levels of flavoring compounds. Ale yeasts produce 86

higher concentrations of esters and higher alcohols, while lager yeasts are acknowledged by 87

their “clean flavor profile”, i.e. lack of ester-derived fruity or floral aroma (21). However, 88

there are two distinct genotypes of lager yeasts, designed Saaz and Frohberg (24). Saaz-89

type strains produce lower concentrations of aroma compounds like ethyl acetate, 3-90

methylbutanol and 3-methylbutyl acetate than the more aroma-rich Frohberg yeasts (14). 91

This phenotypic difference resulted in the diversified and differentiated aroma of lager 92

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

5

beers in the market and also would explain the preference for Frohberg type lager yeasts 93

over Saaz-type lager yeasts in beer industry (26). 94

Volatile acetate esters, such as 3-methylbutyl acetate and ethyl acetate, are 95

considered one of the most important groups of aroma-active yeast metabolites because 96

they are responsible for the highly desired fruity, candy and floral character of beverages 97

(41). They are produced by an enzyme-catalyzed condensation reaction between acyl-98

coenzyme A (CoA) and a higher alcohol (38), and small changes in the concentration of 99

these secondary metabolites can have large effects on the sensorial quality of beer (34). 100

Moreover, higher alcohols, like 3-methylbutanol, also contribute to the final quality of 101

different beverages, including beers. Higher alcohols are formed by anabolism or 102

catabolism (Ehrlich pathway) of amino acids (31). As esters are synthesized through higher 103

alcohols and acyl-CoA, the ratio of levels of higher alcohols/esters may affect the beer 104

quality (22). 105

Interestingly, in our previous studies, we have been able to demonstrate a 106

remarkable large phenotypic diversity among a collection of S. cerevisiae strains isolated 107

from fermentation vats during the production of cachaça (the Brazilian spirit that is usually 108

obtained from the distillation of fermented sugarcane juice). Our culture collection was 109

phenotyped on different properties for bioethanol production, including the ability to 110

tolerate ethanol, methanol, aluminum, zinc, different pH values, 5-HMF stress as well as 111

foam production (8). Additionally, different flocculation traits have been observed in yeast 112

strains isolated from fermentation vats during the production of cachaça. Among these 113

strains, we have found some that present a higher flocculation rate and cellular growth at 114

low temperature (1) and other strains that present distinct properties that allow their 115

utilization in the production of beer (M.T. de Souza and T.M. Araújo, unpublished data). 116

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

6

Taking into account all these data, we have decided to use our yeast collection to try 117

to generate yeast strains that would be appropriate to produce lager beers by exploring the 118

capacity of some yeast cachaça strains to flocculate and to be able to ferment maltose at 119

low temperatures with the concomitant production of flavoring compounds. To accomplish 120

this goal, there are different strategies and the choice among them is based on the genetic 121

nature of traits (monogenic or polygenic), the knowledge of the genes involved and 122

phenotypic trait requirement (4, 16). Moreover, because of the complex legislation and 123

consequently the lack of acceptance for the use of recombinant yeast (genetically modified 124

organism - GMO) for food production, only classical techniques such as selection of 125

variants, random mutation, and mating/hybridization are used to produce food-grade starter 126

cultures (33, 37). 127

In our case, the generation of new lager yeasts would require the combination in one 128

single yeast strain the capacity to produce volatile aroma compounds and the flocculation 129

ability. In the present study, we described the use of mating techniques to generate yeast 130

hybrid from a strongly flocculent S. cerevisiae strain and other S. cerevisiae with high 131

acetate esters production. The hybrids were tested for their flocculation ability, maltose 132

fermentation, and production of flavoring compounds in conditions of wort fermentation 133

performed at lower temperatures that are typical for lager yeasts. Therefore, the aims of this 134

work were: (a) to classify the strains of our culture collection regarding their reproductive 135

cycle (hetero or homothallism), as well as their sporulation rates; (b) to use this data as tool 136

to select strains/segregants for further phenotypic improvement using hybridization 137

strategies (direct mating); (c) to compare two mating hybridization techniques using a 138

flocculent strain unable to ferment maltose with another able to ferment maltose and to 139

produce higher concentrations of flavoring compounds strains by using haploid-to-haploid 140

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

7

mating and diploid-to-diploid mating; (d) to test the resulting hybrids for production of beer 141

by comparing the results obtained with classical reference brewery strains. 142

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

8

MATERIALS AND METHODS 143

Strains and growth conditions 144

The yeast strains used in this study were previously isolated from cachaça 145

distilleries according the methodology described before (2, 9, 30, 43). They are stored in 146

YP broth (1% (wt/vol) yeast extract, 2% (wt/vol) meat peptone) added of 30% (vol/vol) 147

glycerol at -80 ºC. All strains are available in the culture collection of the Federal 148

University of Ouro Preto ([email protected]). The commercial strain Saccharomyces 149

pastorianus var. Weihenstephan 34/70 (tetraploid) (Fermentis, Germany) and the laboratory 150

strains Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4743 (MATa/α, diploid) and BY4742 (MATα, 151

haploid) (both purchased from EUROSCARF, Germany) were used as controls. 152

Yeast cells were grown in YPD broth containing 1% (wt/vol) yeast extract, 2% 153

(wt/vol) meat peptone, 2% (wt/vol) glucose and incubated at 30 ºC with 200 rpm in orbital 154

incubator New Brunswick Model G200 (New Brunswick Scientific, New Jersey, USA). 155

156

General molecular biology techniques 157

Yeast genomic DNA was extracted as previously described (25). PCRs were 158

performed using thermal cycle equipment T100TM

(Bio-Rad Laboratories, California, USA) 159

and for diagnostic purposes was used GoTaq® DNA polymerase (Promega, Wisconsin, 160

USA) according to manufacturer’s protocols. PCR products were visualized using an Alpha 161

Imager Mini System (Alpha Innotech Corporation, San Leandro, USA) after electrophoretic 162

separation at 6 V.cm-1

in a 1.2% (wt/vol) agarose gel stained with GelRedTM

Nucleic Acid 163

(Biotium Inc, Fremont, USA). The primers were synthesized by Integrated DNA 164

Technologies (IDT Corporation, Newark, USA). Yeast strains were transformed using the 165

lithium acetate/polyethylene glycol method (15). 166

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

9

To perform the molecular identification of the species used in this work, internal 167

transcribed spacer (ITS) regions (ITS1/5, 8S/ITS2) were amplified, and the amplicon (880 168

pb) was analyzed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) using HhaI, HaeIII, 169

and HinfI and then compared with a control correspondent sequence originating from S. 170

cerevisiae BY4741 (EUROSCARF, Germany). ITS PCR products were purified and 171

sequenced by capillary electrophoresis (Sanger method) using the ABI3130 platform Life 172

Technologies (Myleus Biotechnology, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil). Sequences 173

were analyzed using the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. 174

175

Sporulation, tetrad dissection and spore viability 176

Yeast cells (128 isolates) pre-grown in YPD broth for 24 h at 30 ºC, 200 rpm, were 177

centrifuged at 1000 x g, 5 min, 4 ºC (AllegraTM

X-12R centrifuge, SX4750/SX4750A 178

rotors, Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, California, USA); the pellets were washed twice 179

with cold sterile water. Cells were then spot-inoculated on sporulation medium containing 180

1% (wt/vol) potassium acetate, 0.05% (wt/vol) potassium bicarbonate, 1.5% (wt/vol) agar, 181

pH 6.0 and incubated at 23 ºC for 5-10 days until asci were visible microscopically. The 182

ascus wall was digested with 5 µl of the lyticase solution (5000 U mL-1

lyticase, 1 M 183

sorbitol, 0.1 M Na3-citrate, 0.06 M EDTA and 0.14 M β-mercaptoethanol) and incubated 184

for 5 min at room temperature. Approximately, forty single-spore cultures from ten tetrads 185

were dissected using a micromanipulator MSM System 400 (Singer Instruments, 186

Roadwater, United Kingdom), on YPD-agar (1% (wt/vol) yeast extract, 2% (wt/vol) meat 187

peptone, 2% (wt/vol) glucose, 1.5% agar) and incubated at 30 ºC for 3-5 days. The spores 188

that formed visible colonies were designed viable. Spore viability was determined as the 189

number of viable spores divided by the total number of spores seeded. 190

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

10

The sporulation frequency and efficiency were evaluated by microscopic 191

observation and quantified according to the methodology already described (11). The 192

sporulation frequency was calculated after counting the number of asci (dyads, triads, and 193

tetrads) in a total cell population of at least 300 (total asci divided by sum of cells and asci 194

counted). The sporulation efficiency was calculated as the sum of tetrads divided by the 195

total number of asci. 196

197

Mating type characterization 198

The heterothallic and homothallic nature of the yeast strains was determined by 199

mating type assaying of all clones of cells produced by viable spores originated from four 200

different tetrads. Mating type was analyzed by PCR as previously demonstrated (17). PCR 201

was carried out directly from colonies of yeast using combinations of three specific primers 202

to MATlocus, MATa and MATα listed in Table 1, under the following conditions: 4 min at 203

94 °C; followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 2 min at 58 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C; with a 204

final 10 min at 72 °C. 205

206

Determination of ploidy by flow cytometry 207

The ploidy of each parental and hybrid strain was determined fluorescently labeling the cell 208

nucleic acid and analyzing the fluorescence by flow cytometry as described (21) with some 209

modifications. Cells were grown for eight hours in YPD broth centrifuged (3269 x g, 10 210

min, 4 ºC) and washed with PBS buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 211

mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4) and resuspended in 250 mM EDTA diluted in the PBS buffer. A 212

sample of 2 x 107 cells were fixed with 70% (v/v) cold ethanol and maintained overnight at 213

4 °C. Cells were centrifuged, resuspended in Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 15 mM 214

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

11

MgCl2, pH 7.7), RNase (0.5 mg mL-1

, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) and incubated 215

overnight at 37 °C. Cells were treated with papain and proteinase K (1 mg mL-1

, Sigma-216

Aldrich, Missouri, USA) for 1 h at 37 °C and 2 h at 50 °C, centrifuged and ressupended in 217

PBS buffer. One hour before analysis, cells samples were stained with 2 µM SYTOX®

218

Green (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). Cells were analyzed using a BD 219

LSR Fortessa™ cell analyzer (Becton Dickinson Bioscience, New York, USA) and 220

detected at 488 nm (FITC-A). DNA content relative was estimated based on the 221

fluorescence intensity compared with the yeast reference strains (S. pastorianus var. 222

Weihenstephan 34/70 – tetraploid; S. cerevisiae BY4743 - MATa/α, diploid; and BY4742 - 223

MATα, haploid) and plotted to exponential scale. 224

225

Electrophoretic karyotype analysis 226

Chromosomal DNA was prepared as described before (42), with minor 227

modifications. Yeast strains were grown on YPD broth at 30 °C to stationary phase. 228

Approximately 4 x 108 cells mL

-1 were washed with 50 mM EDTA pH 8.0, resuspended in 229

lyticase buffer (5000 U mL-1

lyticase, 1 M sorbitol, 0.1 M Na3-citrate, 0.06 M EDTA and 230

0.14 M β-mercaptoethanol) and incubated at 37 °C for 3 hours. An aliquot of this 231

suspension was mixed with an equal volume of 1% (wt/vol) Certified™ low melting 232

agarose (Bio-Rad Laboratories, California, USA) in the buffer (0.01 M EDTA, 0.05 M 233

Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) and distributed into wells of plugs to solidification. The plugs were 234

transferred to 1 mL of a solution containing 1 mg mL-1

proteinase K, 0.45 M EDTA, pH 8.0 235

and 1% (wt/vol) SDS, incubated overnight at 50 °C, washed with 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0 and 236

stored at 4 °C in this last solution. Before use, agarose plugs prepared were washed two 237

times for 30 min at 50 °C in TE buffer (0.01 M Tris-HCl, 0.001 M EDTA, pH 8.0), two 238

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

12

times for 30 min at room temperature in the same buffer and inserted in the wells of a 1% 239

(wt/vol) agarose gel. Electrophoresis was performed using CHEF DR-III pulsed field 240

system (Bio-Rad instruments, California, USA) under 0.5 X TBE (45 mM Tris, 45 mM 241

boric acid, 1.0 mM EDTA, pH 8.3) recirculated, and cooled at 10 °C in the following 242

conditions: 18 h with a switching time of 60 s, 6 h with a switching time of 35 s and a 243

constant current at 150 mA. 244

245

ho deletion mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae LBCM92 246

The expression of the HO gene results in a MAT locus change (MATa to MATα or 247

the other way around) due to the activity of a specific endonuclease Ho. The HO gene was 248

deleted in LBCM92 strain using separately two cassettes conferring resistance to geneticin 249

and to hygromycin in order to delete two copies of the same gene. The deletion cassettes 250

were PCR-amplified from pJET1,2-attB-KanMX-attP and pJET1,2-attB-hph-attP (provided 251

by Laboratory of Molecular Cell Biology, University of Leuven, Belgium) with the 252

corresponding pdel fw and pdel rv primers (Table 1) using a Phusion® High-Fidelity DNA 253

Polymerase (New England BioLabs Inc., Massachusetts, USA). The primers contain 254

sequences of 20 bp that flaking the cassettes and sequences with homology to HO gene 255

(Table 1). 256

PCR were performed in 50 µL and contained 10 ng of template plasmids, 2.5 mM of 257

each dNTP, 50 pmol of each primer, and 2.0 units of Phusion DNA Polymerase and buffer 258

according to the manufacturer’s instructions for use. The PCR thermal cycle program 259

included an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 5 cycles, with a 260

denaturation step at 94 °C for 1 min, an annealing step of 1 min at 62 °C, an elongation step 261

at 72 °C for 2 min, and 30 cycles, with a denaturation step at 94 °C for 1 min, an annealing 262

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

13

step of 30 sec at 71,5 °C and extension step during 2 min at 72 °C. Final extension was 263

performed at 72 °C for 5 min. The desired band after PCR amplification was cut from the 264

gel and purified with NucleoSpin® PCR clean up and Gel extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel, 265

Duren, Germany). Subsequently, 50 µL of PCR product was used for transformation of the 266

strain LBCM92. After heat shock (42 °C), the cells were centrifuged 1500 x g, 2 min 267

(5415D centrifuge, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), recovered in YPD medium for 4 hours 268

(30 °C, 200 rpm) and plated on YPD-agar containing either 400 µg mL-1

of geneticin 269

(Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) or 600 µg mL-1

of hygromycin (Invitrogen, Thermo 270

Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). The first transformation was performed using 271

geneticin cassette, and a selected transformant was used in the second transformation with 272

hygromycin cassette. 273

274

Mating type switching in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae LBCM78 and LBCM92 strains 275

To obtain yeast diploid strains (MATa/a or MATα/α) the mating type was switched 276

using a CEN plasmid (pFL39GAL1HOKanMX) containing a functional HO open reading 277

frame (ORF) controlled by GAL1 promoter (7). Yeast strains were transformed with 1 µg of 278

plasmid and after heat shock (42 °C), the cells were centrifuged (2 min, 1500 x g), 279

recovered in YPD medium for 4 hours (30 °C, 200 rpm) and plated on YPD-agar with 400 280

µg mL-1

of geneticin. Yeast cells transformed were grown in YPD broth with geneticin 281

(400 µg mL-1

) overnight at 30 °C. The cells were centrifuged and resuspended in YP broth 282

supplemented with 2% (wt/vol) galactose, geneticin (400 µg mL-1

) and incubated at 30 °C. 283

After 1 hour of growth was added 2% (wt/vol) glucose. Cell samples were collected each 284

hour during a period of 12 hours of incubation and plated in YPD-agar to obtain single 285

colonies. Mating type of each single colony was verified by PCR according described 286

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

14

above. Yeast cells presenting mating type a/a (originated from LBCM92 strain) and α/α 287

(obtained from LBCM78 strain) were selected and cultivated in YPD broth without 288

geneticin for 48 h to induce plasmid curing. 289

290

Direct mating 291

The diploid strains resulting from the mating type switching of the parental strains 292

(LBCM92 MATa/a and LBCM78 MATα/α) as well as the haploid segregants of both 293

original parental strains (LBCM92 and LBCM78) presenting opposite mating types were 294

streaked on YPD-agar. One colony of each strain of opposite mating type was mixed over 295

the surface of YPD-agar plate with ten microliter of sterile water. The plate was dried and 296

incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. A small sample of the spots was serially diluted and plated in 297

YPD-agar. After 48 h of incubation, a few colonies resulting from the crossing were 298

analyzed by mating type PCR and flow cytometry to confirm the poidy. Furthermore, in 299

order to obtain segregant diploids, the tetraploids strains were inoculated on solid 300

sporulation medium as described before. 301

302

Evaluation of cachaça yeast strains for beer production 303

To evaluate the selected cachaça yeast strains for their use in beer production, we 304

tested them for maltose/maltotriose fermentation, cold tolerance, production of phenolic 305

compounds and flocculation capacity. 306

Maltose fermentation was carried out in tubes with YP broth added of 2% (wt/vol) 307

maltose containing inverted Durham vials in order to detect gas production. Maltotriose 308

fermentation by the yeast strains was assayed by growing them in YP both-2% maltotriose 309

in the absence or presence of antimycin A (2 mg L-1

, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) at 30 310

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

15

°C for 72 h (47). Cold tolerance was evaluated by yeast grown on YPD broth at 12 ºC. 311

Yeast growth was monitored following A600nm in a SpectraMax 340PC384 microplate 312

Reader using a Soft Max® Pro software (Molecular Devices, California, USA). The growth 313

rate for each strain at the exponential growth phase was determined by linear regression of 314

the plot ln A600nm versus time (h). 315

Phenolic compound (4VP) was analyzed using the protocol described before (40) 316

with modifications. The yeast strains (initial O.D600 of approx. 0.1) were grown in Yeast 317

Nitrogen Base Broth (Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) 2% (wt/vol) glucose supplemented 318

with 1 mM ferulic acid at 25 ºC for 5 days. One milliliter of supernatant sample was 319

collected and diluted with an equal volume of methanol. Sample was filtered through 0.25 320

µm pore membrane (Millipore, Massachusetts, USA) and 30 µL was injected into HPLC 321

N02104 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a degasser (DGU-20A5), a binary pump 322

(LC-20AT) and Shimp-pack CLC-ODS column (particle diam. 5 µm, 25 cm x 4.6 mm). 323

The fingerprint was recorded at a wavelength of 260 nm by using a diode array detector 324

(SPD-M20A). A linear gradient of the solvent A, 0.5% (vol/vol) acetic acid in water, and 325

solvent B (100% acetonitrile) was used in the following manner at a flow rate of 1 mL min-

326

1 at 40 ºC: 15 min, 5-20%; 15-40 min, 20-40%; 40-50 min, 40-5%. 327

Flocculation was evaluated by formation of settling cell flocs after growth of yeast 328

in YPD broth at 30 °C for 48 h. Flocculation was quantified using a modified Helm’s assay 329

as described before (1). Yeast strains were grown in YPD broth for 48 h (30 °C, 200 rpm) 330

and washed twice with sterile water. The flocculation test was carried out with 331

approximately 108

cells (1 mL of cell samples at D.O600 of approx. 0.4) washed with CaSO4 332

solution (0.51 g L-1

). Cells in test tubes were harvested by centrifugation and stirred 333

vigorously in vortex, for 30 s, in the solution containing CaSO4 (0.51 g L-1

) sodium acetate 334

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

16

(6.8 g L-1

), acetic acid (4.05 g L-1

) and 4% (vol/vol) ethanol, pH 4.5. Yeast cells in control 335

tubes were resuspended in 0.5 M EDTA (pH 7). After a sedimentation period of 15 min, 336

samples were taken from just below the meniscus and diluted 10X, then the absorption at 337

600 nm was measured. Six replicates were performed for each sample of test tubes, and the 338

extent of flocculation was expressed as the mean percentage using the following formula: 339

Flocculation (%) = 100 × [A600 (control) - A600 (sample)] /A600 (control) 340

341

Screening of haploid segregants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae LBCM78 strain for 342

volatile aroma compounds 343

Yeast pre-grown in 3 mL of YPD broth at 30 ºC overnight was used to inoculate 50 344

mL of YP 250 broth (0.27% (wt/vol) yeast extract, 0.54% (wt/vol) meat peptone, pH 4.5) 345

with 5% (wt/vol) glucose. This pre culture was used for inoculation on YP 250 broth with 346

10% (wt/vol) glucose on fermentation tubes. Batch fermentations were started at 347

approximately 5 x 106 cells mL

-1 and incubated statically at 30 °C for 4 days. The 348

headspace of fermentation samples was taken immediately after the end of batch to prevent 349

evaporation of volatiles. 350

The quantification of volatile aroma compounds was analyzed by gas 351

chromatography coupled with flame ionization detection (CP-3380, Varian) standardized 352

for volatile acetate esters and higher alcohols; n-pentanol was used as internal standard. The 353

GC was equipped with a DB - WAX polietilenoglicol column (60m x 0,25mm x 0,50µm) 354

(J&W, Albany, New York) and the gas used were N2 (gas make up): 29 mL min-1

, H2: 30 355

mL min-1

e Ar: 300 mL min-1

. Samples of 5 mL were collected in glass tubes with 2% (v/v) 356

n-pentanol each. After heating for 30 min at 60 °C, 5 mL of headspace fraction was 357

collected with syringe gastight e injected in the splitless mode (2 min) at 225 ºC. The 358

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

17

temperature program was 50 ºC/min, then 50 °C to 100 ºC, 5 ºC/min to 100 ºC for 3 min, 359

100 °C to 250 ºC at 30 ºC/min and 250 ºC for 3 min and detected at 280 ºC. Compound was 360

quantified by the ratio between the peak area of each sample and the peak area of internal 361

standard using a standard curve. 362

363

Laboratory-scale lager-like fermentations 364

Hybrid and parental strains were tested in mimicked lager fermentations, performed 365

in wort-like medium consisted of dry malt extract (Brewferm® 8 EBC, Belgium) 16% 366

(wt/vol) - 13.2º Brix. The yeasts were pre-cultivated in 3 mL of YPD medium at 30 °C for 367

16 h. Next, a second pre-cultivation was executed consisting of the inoculation of 1 mL of 368

the first pre-culture also in 50 mL of YPD, but now presenting 5% (wt/vol) glucose and 369

incubation at 30 °C for 48 h. These cultures were used for inoculation of the laboratory-370

scale fermentation at an OD600 of 5.0, approximately 5 x 107 cells mL

-1 on tubes (5.5 x 14 371

cm, handmade at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium) without shaking (to simulate an 372

anaerobic condition) at 12 °C for 11 days. All fermentations were performed in triplicates. 373

Weight loss was measured to verify fermentation progress and the quantification of 374

volatiles compounds produced was analyzed as described above. 375

376

Statistical analysis 377

Data from fermentation trials and production of volatile aroma compounds were 378

analyzed using the D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test followed by one-way 379

ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s test. The statistical level of significance was set at P < 380

0.05. 381

382

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

18

RESULTS 383

Sporulation, spore viability and identification of the reproductive cycle 384

In order to develop a strategy for yeast breeding, we initially studied the sporulation 385

rate, spore viability and sexual cycle of yeast strains belonging to a collection obtained 386

from cachaça distilleries. Figure 1 shows the percentage of frequency and efficiency of 387

sporulation as well as the viability of the spores obtained from yeast strains isolated from 388

cachaça distilleries. In general, the major part of the isolates (ninety-six strains) displayed 389

percentage of sporulation above 50% (Fig. 1A). However, fourteen of the analyzed strains 390

were unable to sporulate in the media tested. All strains that presented sporulation were 391

able to form asci with four spores, although in some cases, the number of asci with two 392

spores (dyads) was relatively high resulting in low efficiency of the sporulation (Fig. 1B). 393

Twenty-four yeast strains showed between 90 and 100% of viability, while seven strains 394

presented non-viable spores (Fig. 1C). For these yeast strains and the strains that presented 395

low spores viability, it was necessary to dissect a large number of tetrads and keep spores 396

growing during 5-8 days in order to obtain viable samples. 397

All strains that sporulate were examined through tetrad analysis in order to verify 398

the sexual life cycle. The four spores of one tetrad were selected from each strain and the 399

mating type was determined by PCR. A single band showed that the spores were haploid 400

(MATa, generating a 544 bp product, or MATα, generating a 404 bp product) and two 401

bands illustrated that the spores were diploid (MATa/α) and homothallic yeast (Fig. 2A). 402

Only three strains (LBCM73, LBCM78 and LBCM115) demonstrated a clear heterothallic 403

pattern (two segregants MATa and two segregants MATα) (Fig. 2A, lines 2-16). All other 404

yeast strains examined are homothallic; as one example we have strain LBCM92 (Fig. 2A, 405

lines 17-21). 406

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

19

Selection of yeast strains to mating procedures 407

As stated before, our intention was to generate new yeast strains with characteristics 408

of lager yeasts that require the combination in one single strain the capacity to ferment at 409

low temperatures, to present a constitutive flocculation and with production of flavoring 410

compounds. 411

The first strain chosen for crossing was LBCM78, because this strain has already 412

been identified as a good producer of flavoring compounds as demonstrated in a recent 413

work (2). Besides, it is able to ferment maltose, with a high frequency of sporulation 414

capacity, reasonable spore viability and with a typical heterothallic life cycle (Fig. 1 and 415

Fig. 2A, lines 7-11). After sporulation and tetrad analysis, 23 segregants were screened to 416

identify those that showed higher production of flavoring compounds. From these 417

segregants, eight were randomly phenotyped in small-scale fermentation, with subsequently 418

volatile compounds analysis, and one segregant (78-2b) produced a concentration of 3-419

methylbutyl acetate and the ratio between 3-methylbutyl acetate and 3-methylbutanol 420

similar to its parental strain (LBCM78) (Fig. 3). The mating type of the 78-2b strain was 421

identified as “α” (Fig. 2A, line 9). 422

Among all flocculent strains in the yeast cachaça that we have selected, LBCM92 423

was the strain that presented the highest level of flocculation, confirming data obtained 424

before (1). Nevertheless, this strain presents a sporulation frequency of 10% and it is unable 425

to ferment maltose. In addition, strain LBCM92 is homothallic, generating haploid 426

segregants with unstable mating types, with four spores of all analyzed tetrads by PCR 427

showing two bands, MATa/α (Fig. 2A, lines 17-21). Therefore, as our aim was to compare 428

two mating hybridization techniques, we constructed the LBCM92 strain with deletion of 429

two copies of HO gene. By this way, six transformants were obtained (data not shown). 430

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

20

One of these transformants, identified as 92hoΔ-IIaD, was selected and after sporulation, 431

tetrads were dissected and the stability of all haploid segregants was confirmed. Figure 2A, 432

lines 23-26 shows mating type analysis of four spores of one of these tetrads dissected. In 433

total, 49 segregants were obtained. From these, 17 segregants showing mating type “a” 434

were subsequently evaluated for their flocculation ability. Among these segregants eight 435

(92hoΔ-2b, 92hoΔ-2f, 92hoΔ-9f, 92hoΔ-11c, 92hoΔ-11e, 92hoΔ-16f, 92hoΔ-17d and 436

92hoΔ18c) showed intermediate flocculation ability, or cells fully flocculent compared to 437

the parental LBCM92 (Table S1). The segregant 92hoΔ-16f was selected for crossing 438

because it showed the highest flocculation rate (99%) (Table 2). 439

The taxonomical identity of LBCM78 and LBCM92 strains were previously 440

confirmed by amplification and sequencing of both ITS region. The obtained sequences 441

presented in both cases up to 95% identity to the corresponding region from S. cerevisiae 442

KDLYS9-5 (GenBank: JN599148.1) (data not shown). These results indicate that both 443

strains are S. cerevisiae. 444

445

Hybrid strains by haploid-to-haploid mating 446

Based on these results, and after confirming the ploidy (Fig. 4), we have crossed the 447

haploids 78-2b (MATα) and 92hoΔ-16f (MATa) to obtain the diploid hybrids. All 448

seventeen hybrids obtained were able to ferment maltose, but only four of them (B16, B22, 449

C28 and C33) presented flocculation ability similar to 92hoΔ-16f (Table S1). The 450

confirmation of the mating type of these hybrids is shown in Figure 2B, lines 6-9. Hybrid 451

B22 was chosen for further studies because it presented a flocculation rate of 70%, although 452

with an inferior value observed in the original 92hoΔ-16f haploid strain (approximately of 453

98%) (Table 2). 454

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

21

Hybrid strains by diploid-to-diploid mating 455

In order to carry out the cross between the diploid S. cerevisiae LBCM78 and 456

LBCM92 (both MATa/α), a procedure that force mating type change in diploid cells was 457

used by which LBCM78 and LBCM92 yeast strains were transformed with 458

pFL39GAL1HOKanMX and grown in medium containing galactose to induce the HO gene 459

expression. Ninety-seven colonies (55 from LBCM78 strain and 42 from LBCM92 strain) 460

were analyzed; and mating type homozygotes was observed in two colonies from LBCM92 461

strain (identified as 92 IX MATa/a and 92 C MATα/α) and four colonies from LBCM78 462

strain (identified as 78 a32 MATa/a, 78 a69 MATa/a, 78 a21 MATα/α, 78 a34 MATα/α) 463

(data not shown). After plasmid curing procedure, it was observed that 78 a34 MATα/α 464

(15) and 92 IX MATa/a (7) strains lost the ability to grow in YPD with 400 µg mL-1

of 465

geneticin. 466

Thus, yeast strains 92 IX (7) MATa/a and 78 a34 (15) MATα/α (Fig. 2C, lines 3 and 467

4) were subsequently chosen for hybridization using the cell-to-cell mating procedure. A 468

total of 33 hybrids from this crossing were isolated and thirty-one were able to ferment 469

maltose (Table S2). Interestingly, none of these hybrids shown to possess the ability of 470

flocculation; even so, eight hybrids (B15, C1, C2, C3, C4, C13, C14 and C16 - Fig. 2C, 471

lines 6-13) were randomly chosen to be sporulated and to generate new diploid segregants. 472

Among the 495 segregants obtained and analyzed, twenty-five recovered flocculation 473

ability, where twelve presented cells fully flocculent (Table S2). However, three segregants 474

(C2-1d, C3-7b and C4-1g) presented a flocculation ratio (around 91-95%) compared to the 475

parental strain – LBCM92 (Table 2). Figure 2C, lines 14-16 shows mating type profile of 476

these three segregants (C2-1d and C4-1g: MATα; C3-7b: MATa). 477

478

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

22

Confirmation of ploidy and hybrid conditions 479

Considering their promising characteristics, yeast strains C2-1d, C3-7b, C4-1g, B22 480

and parental were submitted to ploidy analysis by using Sytox Green staining and flow 481

cytometry to measure the DNA content. All yeast strains generated dual peaks of 482

fluorescence, with the second peak attributed to cells undergoing DNA synthesis (G2/M). 483

Haploid, diploid and tetraploid yeast strains are used as controls being easily 484

distinguishable each other, with cells displaying second peaks respectively of 485

approximately double and quadruple fluorescent levels of the haploid control strain (Fig. 486

4A to 4D). Parental yeast strains (LBCM78 and LBCM92) were confirmed as diploid (Fig. 487

4G and 4L), and their segregants 78-2b and 92hoΔ-16f as haploids as well (Fig. 4F and 488

4K). Hybrid strain B22 originated from the crossing between these two haploid strains gave 489

fluorescent peaks equivalent to diploid genome content (Fig. 4N). Hybrid strains (C2, C3 490

and C4) generated from diploid-to-diploid mating (LBCM78 X LBCM92) displayed a 491

similar profile to that exhibited by the tetraploid control (Fig. 4H, 4I and 4M). Moreover, 492

their segregants (C2-1d, C3-7b and C4-1g) were confirmed as diploids (Fig. 4E, 4J and 493

4O). Furthermore, hybrid status was confirmed by karyotyping and the gel banding patterns 494

are shown in the supplementary material, Fig. S2. The tetraploid hybrid strains C2, C3 and 495

C4 (derivative of diploid-to-diploid mating) presented band of chromosomes from both 496

parental strains and their segregants have maintained several bands of LBCM78 and 497

LBCM92. Although less pronounced, the hybrid character was also shown by strain B22 498

(derivate of haploid-to-haploid mating) that presented bands from parental strains, 78-2b 499

and 92hoΔ-16f as indicated by arrows (Fig. S2). 500

501

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

23

Production of flavoring compounds during fermentation 502

Next, we assessed the potential of the new yeast strains generate in this work to 503

produce aromatic lager beer. The diploid hybrid strain (B22), its ancestral segregant 504

haploids (78-2b and 92hoΔ-16f) and the segregants obtained from tetraploids (C4-1g and 505

C2-1d), as well as the original wild type strains (LBCM78 and LBCM92) were tested in 506

laboratory-scale fermentation mimicking lager style (see Materials and Methods for 507

details). One Frohberg-type lager strain S. pastorianus W34/70 was included as reference 508

strain. 509

Since the fermentation of lager beers takes place at low temperatures, we verified 510

the growth of the new strains in such conditions. Both parental, the hybrid B22, the 511

segregants C2-1d and C4-1g were able to grow on YPD broth at the temperature of 12 °C 512

with a rate of growth of approximately 0.05 h-1

as lager strain W34/70 (Table S3). On the 513

other hand, the segregant strain C3-7b grew poorly on these conditions and its fermentation 514

performance was not evaluated. In addition, the parental (LBCM78, LBCM92, 78-2b, and 515

92hoΔ-16f), hybrid (B22) and segregant (C2-1d and C4-1g) strains did not fermented 516

maltotriose (Table S3). All yeast strains have not shown growth in presence of antimycin A 517

(inhibitor of cell respiration), except the lager strain S. pastorianus W34/70 (Table S3). All 518

yeast strains converted ferulic acid into the phenolic compound (2-methoxy-4-vinilphenol, 519

4VP), and only the strains, C3-7b, B22, C4-1g that produced below of limit detection in the 520

tested conditions (Table S4). 521

Fermentation efficiency was monitored by weight loss generated by CO2 production 522

and the results are shown in Figure 5. The results show that the C2-1d displayed the best 523

performance since it reached the same ethanol production level after 6 days as well as the 524

reference lager strain W34/70 and higher levels than the parental strain LBCM78 (Fig. 5). 525

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

24

On the other hand, hybrid strains C4-1g and B22 showed an inferior performance when 526

compared to their parental strains, LBCM78 and 78-2b, respectively. However, at the end 527

of fermentation, all hybrid strains showed similar ethanol levels but below to the lager 528

strain (Fig. 5). As expected, the strains LBCM92 and its segregant 92hoΔ-16f displayed 529

poor ethanol production due to deficiency in maltose fermentation (Fig. 5). 530

Analysis of the aroma production of the hybrid strains revealed that breeding 531

generated changes in aroma production (even in the segregants originated by tetraploid 532

hybrid strains). Concentration of aroma compounds in the fermented malt extract is shown 533

in Figure 6. Some hybrids, such as B22 and C2-1d, showed 3-methylbutyl acetate 534

concentrations exceeding the levels of the parental strain LBCM78, but similar at segregant 535

78-2b (Fig. 6B). Production of 3-methylbutanol was also increased although to a lesser 536

extent (Fig. 6A). All hybrid strains showed ethyl acetate concentration higher than the 537

parental strain LBCM78, but similar to the lager strain W34/70 (Fig. 6C). Among the three 538

tested hybrid strains, C2-1d produced higher ratio 3-methylbutyl acetate/3-methylbutanol 539

when compared to all other strains including the lager strain W34/70 (Fig. 6D). Given that 540

the strain C2-1d showed good fermentation performance, it might be an important 541

candidate for the production of lager beer with distinct sensorial characteristics. 542

543

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

25

DISCUSSION 544

The demand for yeast strains with optimal and heterogeneous technological profiles 545

for use in beer production has increased. In this study, we demonstrated that it is possible to 546

breed yeast strains isolated from cachaça distilleries to develop novel lager brewery strains 547

with desired traits. 548

First, we tried to understand the characteristics of 128 cachaça yeast strains 549

regarding their sporulation ability; spore viability and life cycle. Tetrad analysis revealed 550

levels of sporulation varying from high to very low and the frequency of sporulation 551

(proportion of four spores for asci among total asci) was also variable. We used optimal 552

conditions for sporulation (medium containing acetate and incubation temperature 553

approximately 6 ºC lower than the optimal temperature for growth as suggest before (10); 554

however, our results showed fourteen yeast strains unable to sporulate, even when the 555

incubation time was increased to 30 days. These results are consistent with those obtained 556

for S. cerevisiae strains isolated from wine fermentation (11, 18, 27). Moreover, as low 557

frequency of sporulation is usually associate to aneuploidy and other types of unbalance in 558

the genome, the fact that the majority of cachaça yeast strains are diploids (data not 559

shown), suggest that still unknown mechanisms must be involved in the control of the 560

sporulation. 561

The yeast spore viability assay is generally performed to check the percentage of 562

viable spores obtained among spores resulting from the sporulation process after 2-5 days 563

of dissection and incubation at temperature of 30 ºC (11, 18). In our study, spore viability 564

was also quite variable among the isolates; while only 37 strains presented spore viability 565

above 80%, seven strains presented non-viable spores. Another interesting characteristic 566

was that some strains presented spore colonies visible only after long time of incubation. In 567

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

26

general, there was no relationship among the parameters frequency and efficiency of 568

sporulation as well as the viability of the spores, because several strains presented a low 569

percentage of sporulation, but had high spore efficiency (i.e. LBCM50) or high percentage 570

of sporulation and low or no viability of spores (i.e. LBCM94). 571

Regarding the sexual life cycle, and considering the sporulating strains, the majority 572

of the cachaça yeast strains analyzed seem to be homothallic (98%) and only three strains 573

heterothallic. Interestingly, different data have shown that several heterothallic S. cerevisiae 574

strains have been isolated from wine and natural sites (11, 19). However, the majority of 575

natural isolates of S. cerevisiae are considered able to undergo mating-type switching and 576

therefore be homothallic (6, 28). If this is indeed the case, then the HO endonuclease should 577

be predominantly functional in S. cerevisiae strain in nature, and homothallism represents 578

the most common life cycle similar to results shown here. Among the homothallic yeast 579

strains of our study, 12 strains presented at least one inactive copy of HO gene (date not 580

shown). The mutations found in the HO sequences of S. cerevisiae strains are strong 581

indicators of full or partial loss of endonuclease Ho function and yeast cells are unable to 582

switch mating type and to occur crossing between neighboring “sister” cells (self-583

diploidization) (19). 584

On the other hand, due to its complex sexual life cycle, homothallic yeast can 585

eliminate cells with deleterious recessive mutations from the population, while generating 586

homozygous diploid cells in which these mutations are not present (28, 39, 45). This would 587

be important in the cachaça fermenting conditions due to existence of different stressing 588

conditions, that together with lack of nutrients lead to sporulation of yeast cells for survival 589

(32); nevertheless, and because the presence of an active HO gene, some of the descendants 590

of these haploid spores will do self-diploidization. Therefore, homothallism can be 591

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

27

important to select cachaça yeast strains resistant to different types of stress (28, 32). 592

Nevertheless, and from a breeding perspective, the use of spores that display homothallic 593

behavior is not appropriate forcing the deletion of the HO gene and at same time generating 594

a genetic modified yeast cells (35, 36). 595

Based on these results, we identified yeast strains suitable for use in sexual 596

hybridization techniques, with good sporulation rate and viable spores. The development of 597

hybrids has proven to be a powerful approach to generate novel yeast variants with 598

enhanced characteristics for lager beer (21, 26, 36). This is very important for the brewing 599

industry because, as recently demonstrated (13), the available commercial strains have been 600

cultivated over the years suffering an intense domestication process that lead to a strong 601

industry-specific selection for many important traits (stress tolerance; sugar utilization; 602

flavor production; etc). Nevertheless, it was also associated with loss of the sexual cycle 603

and decay of survival in nature. Consequently, the genome of brewing yeast strains has 604

become aneuploidy or polyploidy, with reduction of the capacity of sporulation and with 605

the generation of spores with low viability. This situation is still more serious for lager 606

strains because they are originated from a natural hybridization between S. cerevisiae and S. 607

eubayanus (29) and the resulting hybrid S. pastorianus is a tetraploid strain that cannot be 608

used for breeding practices. Therefore, we believe that our strategy can contribute to 609

overcome all these natural difficulties creating possibilities of generation of new interesting 610

lager yeast strains for brewery industry. 611

Thus, we used two cachaça S. cerevisiae strains LBCM92 and LBCM78 that 612

present a higher flocculation rate and higher levels of flavoring compounds, respectively. In 613

order to get new yeast strains with desirable properties useful for lager beer production, we 614

compare two hybridization methods: haploid-to-haploid and diploid-to-diploid mating 615

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

28

procedures. In spite of the fact that the haploid-to-haploid mating increases the possibility 616

of yielding a superior hybrid (21, 26, 38), in our case the selected superior segregant 617

haploid from LBCM92 MATa/α HO::KanMX/HO::hph (LBCM92hoΔ) should be 618

considered a genetically modified organism, and the use of GM yeasts in food fermentation 619

processes is still controversial (39). 620

Putative hybrids from haploid-to-haploid mating events were confirmed using PCR 621

mating type analysis. However, an assessment of parental phenotype traits showed that only 622

one hybrid called B22 inherited high flocculation capacity, although with a rate below the 623

value of haploid parent strain. Several authors consider that the biggest advantage of the 624

haploid-to-haploid mating is the phenotyping of the haploid segregants before to the mating 625

(in our case the capacity to ferment maltose and higher production of flavoring compound – 626

78-2b, and high capacity to flocculate – 92hoΔ-16f); since parental traits can be transferred 627

to diploid hybrid increasing the chances to obtain strains with the desired characteristics 628

(38). However, the results shown that this technique was not a promising approach because 629

we did not have any hybrids with a flocculation rate similar to or higher than that of the 630

parent strain. This also suggests that high flocculation ability may be a polygenic and 631

multifactorial trait (1), and that most probably the ancestral 78-2b (originated from the 632

parental strain LBCM78) must carry out negative regulators of the flocculation. 633

In addition, none of the yeast strains originated from diploid-to-diploid mating 634

showed flocculation ability. In this case, as flow cytometry analysis further revealed, DNA 635

content of these hybrids was equivalent to tetraploid genome (Fig. 4), we initially wondered 636

that this loss of phenotype should be regulated by ploidy (12). Interestingly, our results 637

have shown that the flocculation phenotype was recovered in several segregants obtained 638

from dissection of tetraploid hybrids (Table S1), with three segregants (C2-1d, C3-7b and 639

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

29

C4-1g) displaying stronger flocculation ability. However, the situation seems to be more 640

complex since the diploids resulting from the crossing between the haploids 78-2b and 641

92hoΔ-16f presented a variable flocculation rate reinforcing the idea that flocculation 642

would be a polygenic and multifactorial trait (1), and that in the genetic background of the 643

parental wild strain LBCM78 there would be strong negative regulators of the flocculation. 644

Interestingly, the segregation of such diploids generated from the approach haploid-to-645

haploid breeding also lead to a recovery of a high rate of flocculation (compared to the 646

parental wild strain LBCM92 – data not shown), but it was observed a high level of loss of 647

spore viability, a trait inherited from both parental strains that present spore viability 648

ranging between 51 and 60% (strain LBCM78) and 21 and 30% (strain LBCM92). Beyond 649

that, the presence of the genetic markers originated from the deletion of HO gene in the 650

parental wild strain LBCM92 present an obstacle to the use of such strains in the brewery 651

industry. 652

In contrast, triploid and tetraploid hybrids obtained by crossing between S. 653

cerevisiae and S. eubayanus showed a much higher flocculation ability when compared to 654

the correspondent segregant diploid hybrids (20). Some phenotypic traits were also affected 655

by the ploidy level in other interspecific Saccharomyces hybrids, where triploid and 656

tetraploid hybrids were able to produce more ethanol and 3-methylbutyl acetate than their 657

parental strains and diploid hybrids (26). Therefore, it seems that the influence of ploidy is 658

rather circumstantial and that most probably the presence of dominant negative regulators 659

of flocculation is the main reason for the decrease of the flocculation rate in the different 660

hybrids obtained in this work. 661

Additionally, lager beers are traditionally fermented at lower temperatures using 662

bottom-fermenting yeast strains. The cold adaptation of lager yeast seems have been 663

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

30

inherited from S. eubayanus part of the genome (3, 14, 44, 46). However, we found 664

intraspecific hybrid strains (S. cerevisiae) able to ferment malt extract at 12 °C and which 665

produced more ethanol than their corresponding parental strains. Indeed, the hybrid C2-1d 666

also showed interesting fermentation performance in laboratory-scale lager beer 667

fermentation comparable to lager strain S. pastorianus W34/70 (Figure 5). In fact this is not 668

a surprising finding since it has been demonstrated that ale brewing S. cerevisiae strains can 669

tolerate low temperatures (13). 670

However, not all of the hybrids developed were able to outperform their respective 671

parental strains in laboratory-scale lager beer fermentation. This was particularly true in the 672

case of the haploid-to-haploid mating technique, yielding the so-called crippled strains, 673

which show improvement for some selected traits, but a worse performance for other 674

industrially important phenotypes (in our case, reduced flocculation rate) (38). 675

Three of the most important aroma compounds in beer are 3-methylbutyl acetate (a 676

banana-like aroma), ethyl acetate (an alcoholic, fruity, but also solvent-like aroma) (38) and 677

3-methylbutanol (fruity, sweet) (35). In general, the production of 3-methylbutyl acetate 678

and ethyl acetate was found to be significantly higher in the hybrids than parental strains 679

(Figure 6). In addition, production of 3-methylbutyl acetate was accompanied by increase 680

in ethyl acetate, since these compounds share part of their metabolic pathway (31). Despite 681

the fact that ethyl acetate often contributes positively to the aroma, it can sometimes be 682

perceived negatively because it can emanate a solvent-like aroma when it is present in high 683

concentrations (34). However, in our results, ethyl acetate production of the hybrids did not 684

reach high levels; the maximal concentration detected was 18 mg L-1

in the strains C4-1g, 685

while the odor threshold in lager beer should be approximately 30 mg L-1

(34, 41). The 3-686

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

31

methylbutyl acetate concentration obtained with hybrid strain C2-1d was markedly high, 687

reached concentrations around its report threshold level in beer (1.2 mg L-1

) (34). 688

In conclusion, our study showed the improvement of yeast strains S. cerevisiae 689

isolated from cachaça distilleries for production of lager style beer by using haploid-to-690

haploid and diploid-to-diploid mating experiments. The best hybrid generated showed good 691

fermentation performance at low temperature, high flocculation capacity and desirable 692

production of acetate esters that was significantly better than one commercial lager strain. 693

Nevertheless, and considering that other non-typical characteristics were found in the new 694

hybrid strain, i.e. incapacity to ferment maltotriose and production of phenolic off-flavors 695

compounds, additional work still using classical breeding and/or mutagenesis procedures 696

must be done to improve the characteristics of such new hybrid. In any case, our work 697

demonstrates that alternative techniques can be used to found new and interesting strains to 698

be used in beer production. 699

700

Acknowledgments 701

We thank Rodrigo Dian O. A. Soares for technical assistance in the cytometer 702

analysis. This work was supported by grants from Fundação de Capacitação de Pessoal de 703

Nível Superior from the Ministry of Education – CAPES/Brazil (PCF-PVE 021/2012; 704

Edital 76/2014) and from Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Fundação de Amparo à 705

Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais - FAPEMIG (Process APQ-00263-10) and a research 706

fellowship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq 707

(Brazil) Process 304815/2012. 708

709

710

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

32

Conflicts of interest 711

Authors wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with 712

this publication and there has not been significant financial support for this work that could 713

have influenced its outcome. 714

715

References 716

717

1. Alvarez, F., L. F. da Mata Correa, T. Macedo Araújo, B. E. Fernandes Mota, 718

L. E. F. Ribeiro da Conceição, I. de Miranda Castro, and R. Lopes Brandão. 719

2014. Variable flocculation profiles of yeast strains isolated from cachaça 720

distilleries. Int J Food Microbiol 190:97-104. 721

2. Barbosa, E. A., M. T. Souza, R. H. S. Diniz, F. Godoy-Santos, F. Faria-Oliveira, 722

L. F. M. Correa, F. Alvarez, M. X. Coutrim, R. J. d. C. F. Afonso, and I. M. 723

Castro. 2016. Quality improvement and geographical indication of cachaça 724

(Brazilian spirit) by using locally selected yeast strains. J App Microbiol 121:1038-725

1051. 726

3. Bing, J., P.-J. Han, W.-Q. Liu, Q.-M. Wang, and F.-Y. Bai. 2014. Evidence for a 727

Far East Asian origin of lager beer yeast. Curr Biology 24:R380-R381. 728

4. Bizaj, E., A. G. Cordente, J. R. Bellon, P. Raspor, C. D. Curtin, and I. S. 729

Pretorius. 2012. A breeding strategy to harness flavor diversity of Saccharomyces 730

interspecific hybrids and minimize hydrogen sulfide production. FEMS Yeast Res 731

12:456-465. 732

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

33

5. Bokulich, N. A., and C. W. Bamforth. 2013. The microbiology of malting and 733

brewing. Microbiol Mol Biol R 77:157-172. 734

6. Butler, G., C. Kenny, A. Fagan, C. Kurischko, C. Gaillardin, and K. H. Wolfe. 735

2004. Evolution of the MAT locus and its Ho endonuclease in yeast species. Proc 736

Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:1632-7. 737

7. Connolly, B., C. I. White, and J. E. Haber. 1988. Physical monitoring of mating 738

type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 8:2342-2349. 739

8. da Conceição, L., M. Saraiva, R. Diniz, J. Oliveira, G. Barbosa, F. Alvarez, L. 740

da Mata Correa, H. Mezadri, M. Coutrim, R. d. Afonso, C. Lucas, I. Castro, 741

and R. Brandão. 2015. Biotechnological potential of yeast isolates from cachaça: 742

the Brazilian spirit. J Ind Microbiology Biot 42:237-246. 743

9. de Souza, A. P., M. e. A. Vicente, R. C. Klein, L. G. Fietto, M. X. Coutrim, R. J. 744

de Cássia Franco Afonso, L. D. Araújo, P. H. da Silva, L. E. Bouillet, I. M. 745

Castro, and R. L. Brandão. 2012. Strategies to select yeast starters cultures for 746

production of flavor compounds in cachaça fermentations. Antonie Van 747

Leeuwenhoek 101:379-92. 748

10. Elrod, S. L., S. M. Chen, K. Schwartz, and E. O. Shuster. 2009. Optimizing 749

Sporulation Conditions for Different Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain Backgrounds, 750

p. 21-26. In S. Keeney (ed.), Mol Gen Method, vol. 1. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. 751

11. Fernández-González, M., J. Úbeda, and A. Briones. 2015. Study of 752

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Wine Strains for Breeding Through Fermentation 753

Efficiency and Tetrad Analysis. Curr Microbiol 70:441-449. 754

12. Galitski, T., A. J. Saldanha, C. A. Styles, E. S. Lander, and G. R. Fink. 1999. 755

Ploidy regulation of gene expression. Science 285:251-254. 756

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

34

13. Gallone, B., J. Steensels, T. Prahl, L. Soriaga, V. Saels, B. Herrera-Malaver, A. 757

Merlevede, M. Roncoroni, K. Voordeckers, and L. Miraglia. 2016. 758

Domestication and divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae beer yeasts. Cell 759

166:1397-1410. e16. 760

14. Gibson, B. R., E. Storgårds, K. Krogerus, and V. Vidgren. 2013. Comparative 761

physiology and fermentation performance of Saaz and Frohberg lager yeast strains 762

and the parental species Saccharomyces eubayanus. Yeast 30:255-266. 763

15. Gietz, R. D., R. H. Schiestl, A. R. Willems, and R. A. Woods. 1995. Studies on 764

the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure. Yeast 765

11:355-60. 766

16. Giudici, P., L. Solieri, A. M. Pulvirenti, and S. Cassanelli. 2005. Strategies and 767

perspectives for genetic improvement of wine yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 768

66:622-8. 769

17. Huxley, C., E. D. Green, and I. Dunbam. 1999. Rapid assessment of 770

Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating type by PCR. Trends Genet 6:236. 771

18. Johnston, J. R., C. Baccari, and R. K. Mortimer. 2000. Genotypic 772

characterization of strains of commercial wine yeasts by tetrad analysis. Res 773

Microbiol 151:583-590. 774

19. Katz Ezov, T., S.-L. Chang, Z. E. Frenkel, A. V. Segrè, M. Bahalul, A. W. 775

Murray, J.-Y. Leu, A. Korol, and Y. Kashi. 2010. Heterothallism in 776

Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates from nature: effect of HO locus on the mode of 777

reproduction. Mol Ecol 19:121-131. 778

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

35

20. Krogerus, K., M. Arvas, M. De Chiara, F. Magalhães, L. Mattinen, M. Oja, V. 779

Vidgren, J.-X. Yue, G. Liti, and B. Gibson. 2016. Ploidy influences the functional 780

attributes of de novo lager yeast hybrids. App Microbiol Biot 100:7203-7222. 781

21. Krogerus, K., F. Magalhães, V. Vidgren, and B. Gibson. 2015. New lager yeast 782

strains generated by interspecific hybridization. J Ind Microbiol Biot 42:769-778. 783

22. Landaud, S., E. Latrille, and G. Corrieu. 2001. Top Pressure and Temperature 784

Control the Fusel Alcohol/Ester Ratio through Yeast Growth in Beer Fermentation. 785

J I Brewing 107:107-117. 786

23. Libkind, D., C. Hittinger, E. Valerio, C. Goncalves, and J. Dover. 2011. 787

Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-788

brewing yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:14539. 789

24. Liti, G., D. M. Carter, A. M. Moses, J. Warringer, L. Parts, S. A. James, R. P. 790

Davey, I. N. Roberts, A. Burt, V. Koufopanou, I. J. Tsai, C. M. Bergman, D. 791

Bensasson, M. J. T. O'Kelly, A. van Oudenaarden, D. B. H. Barton, E. Bailes, 792

A. N. Nguyen Ba, M. Jones, M. A. Quail, I. Goodhead, S. Sims, F. Smith, A. 793

Blomberg, R. Durbin, and E. J. Louis. 2009. Population genomics of domestic 794

and wild yeasts. Nature 458:337-341. 795

25. López, V., A. Querol, D. Ramón, and M. T. Fernández-Espinar. 2001. A 796

simplified procedure to analyse mitochondrial DNA from industrial yeasts. Int J 797

Food Microbiol 68:75-81. 798

26. Mertens, S., J. Steensels, V. Saels, G. De Rouck, G. Aerts, and K. J. Verstrepen. 799

2015. A Large Set of Newly Created Interspecific Saccharomyces Hybrids Increases 800

Aromatic Diversity in Lager Beers. App Environ Microbiol 81:8202-8214. 801

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

36

27. Mortimer, R., and M. Polsinelli. 1999. On the origins of wine yeast. Res. 802

Microbiol. 150:199. 803

28. Mortimer, R. K. 2000. Evolution and variation of the yeast (Saccharomyces) 804

genome. Genome Res 10:403-409. 805

29. Nguyen, H. V., J. L. Legras, C. Neuveglise, and C. Gaillardin. 2011. 806

Deciphering the hybridisation history leading to the Lager lineage based on the 807

mosaic genomes of Saccharomyces bayanus strains NBRC1948 and CBS380. PLoS 808

One 6:e25821:1-19. 809

30. Oliveira, V. A., M. A. Vicente, L. G. Fietto, I. M. Castro, M. X. Coutrim, D. 810

Schüller, H. Alves, M. Casal, J. O. Santos, L. D. Araújo, P. H. da Silva, and R. 811

L. Brandão. 2008. Biochemical and molecular characterization of Saccharomyces 812

cerevisiae strains obtained from sugar-cane juice fermentations and their impact in 813

cachaça production. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:693-701. 814

31. Pires, E. J., J. A. Teixeira, T. Brányik, and A. A. Vicente. 2014. Yeast: the soul 815

of beer’s aroma—a review of flavour-active esters and higher alcohols produced by 816

the brewing yeast. App Microbiol Biot 98:1937-1949. 817

32. Plech, M., J. A. G. M. de Visser, and R. Korona. 2013. Heterosis Is Prevalent 818

Among Domesticated but not Wild Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3: 819

Genes|Genomes|Genetics 4:315-323. 820

33. Pretorius, I. 2000. Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches 821

to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16:675. 822

34. Saerens, S. M. G., F. R. Delvaux, K. J. Verstrepen, and J. M. Thevelein. 2010. 823

Production and biological function of volatile esters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 824

Microbial Biot 3:165-177. 825

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

37

35. Saerens, S. M. G., P. J. Verbelen, N. Vanbeneden, J. M. Thevelein, and F. R. 826

Delvaux. 2008. Monitoring the influence of high-gravity brewing and fermentation 827

temperature on flavour formation by analysis of gene expression levels in brewing 828

yeast. Appl Microbiol Biot 80:1039-1051. 829

36. Sanchez, R. G., N. Solodovnikova, and J. Wendland. 2012. Breeding of lager 830

yeast with Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves stress resistance and fermentation 831

performance. Yeast 29:343-355. 832

37. Schilter, B., and A. Constable. 2002. Regulatory control of genetically modified 833

(GM) foods: likely developments. Toxicol Lett 127:341-349. 834

38. Steensels, J., E. Meersman, T. Snoek, V. Saels, and K. J. Verstrepen. 2014. 835

Large-scale selection and breeding to generate industrial yeasts with superior aroma 836

production. App Environ Microbiol 80:6965-6975. 837

39. Steensels, J., T. Snoek, E. Meersman, M. P. Nicolino, K. Voordeckers, and K. J. 838

Verstrepen. 2014. Improving industrial yeast strains: exploiting natural and 839

artificial diversity. Fems Microbiol Rev 38:947-995. 840

40. Tanruean, K., and N. Rakariyatham. 2016. Efficient Synthesis of 4-Vinyl 841

Guaiacol via Bioconversion of Ferulic Acid by Volvariella volvacea. Chiang Mai J. 842

Sci 43:158 - 168. 843

41. Verstrepen, K. J., G. Derdelinckx, J.-P. Dufour, J. Winderickx, J. M. 844

Thevelein, I. S. Pretorius, and F. R. Delvaux. 2003. Flavor-active esters: Adding 845

fruitiness to beer. J Biosci Bioeng 96:110-118. 846

42. Vezinhet, F., B. Blondin, and J.-N. Hallet. 1990. Chromosomal DNA patterns and 847

mitochondrial DNA polymorphism as tools for identification of enological strains of 848

Saccharomyces cerevisiae. App Microbiol Biot 32:568-571. 849

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

38

43. Vicente, M. A., L. G. Fietto, I. M. Castro, A. N. dos Santos, M. X. Coutrim, and 850

R. L. Brandão. 2006. Isolation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains producing 851

higher levels of flavoring compounds for production of "cachaça" the Brazilian 852

sugarcane spirit. Int J Food Microbiol 108:51-9. 853

44. Walther, A., A. Hesselbart, and J. Wendland. 2014. Genome sequence of 854

Saccharomyces carlsbergensis, the world's first pure culture lager yeast. G3: Genes| 855

Genomes| Genetics 4:783-793. 856

45. Wang, C., and Y. Liu. 2013. Dynamic study of yeast species and Saccharomyces 857

cerevisiae strains during the spontaneous fermentations of Muscat blanc in 858

Jingyang, China. Food Microbiol 33:172. 859

46. Wendland, J. 2014. Lager yeast comes of age. Eukaryot Cell 13:1256-1265. 860

47. Zastrow, C. R., C. Hollatz, P. S. de Araujo, and B. U. Stambuk. 2001. 861

Maltotriose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 862

27:34-8. 863

864

865

866

867

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

39

Figures legends 868

869

FIG 1 Sporulation analysis of yeast strains isolated from cachaça distilleries. A, 870

sporulation frequency; B, Sporulation efficiency; C, Spore viability. Numbers 871

corresponding to each yeast strain of the collection LBCM is placed inside bars. 872

873

FIG 2 Determination of yeast strain mating type by PCR. Colony-PCR using three primers 874

to amplify either a MATa (544bp) or MATα (404bp) specific band. M, Promega™ 100bp 875

DNA Ladder. (A) S. cerevisiae LBCM73, LBCM78, LBCM115, LBCM92 and their 876

segregants denoted with a number and one small letter. (B) Yeast strains B16, B22, C28, 877

C33 are hybrids originated from the crossing between segregants 78-2b and 92hoΔ-16f, and 878

control strains S. cerevisiae BY4742 MATα and BY4743 MATa/α. (C) Yeast strains 92 IX 879

(7) diploid MATa/a, 78 a34 (15) diploid MATα/α; Strains C1, C2, C3, C4, B15, C13, C14 880

and C16 are tetraploid hybrids; Strains C2-1d, C4-1g and C3-7b are diploid segregants. 881

882

FIG 3 Concentration of aroma compounds produced by parental strain S. cerevisiae 883

LBCM78 and its meiotic segregants at the end of fermentation in YP 250 broth with 10% 884

(wt/vol) glucose. Results are the mean and standard deviation of two independent 885

experiments. Means with the same letter are not significantly different from each other 886

(Tukey’s test, P < 0.05). 887

888

FIG 4 DNA content analysis of yeast strains by fluorescence flow cytometry. Cells were 889

processed through the staining protocol with SYTOX® Green (see Material and Methods). 890

SYTOX® Green fluorescence was analyzed using Flowjo® software. Fluorescence 891

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

40

histograms present cell peaks at the G0/G1 and G2/M border. A, B, C control strains; F, K 892

haploid segregants; N, strain originated from haploid-to-haploid mating; G, L, parental 893

strains; H, I, M tetraploid strains originated from diploid-to-diploid mating; E, J, O 894

segregants originated from dissection of tetraploid strains. 895

896

FIG 5 Fermentation kinetics (depicted as cumulative weight loss) of parental strains S. 897

cerevisiae LBCM78, LBCM92, 78-2b and 92hoΔ-16f, hybrid strains B22, C4-1g, C2-1d 898

and S. pastorianus var. Weihenstephan 34/70. Results are the mean and standard deviation 899

of two independent experiments. 900

901

FIG 6 The concentrations of aroma compounds in the malt extract fermented by parental 902

strains S. cerevisiae LBCM78, LBCM92, 78-2b and 92hoΔ-16f, hybrid strains B22, C4-1g, 903

C2-1d and S. pastorianus var. Weihenstephan 34/70. Results are the mean and standard 904

deviation of two independent experiments. Means with the same letters are not significantly 905

different from each other (Tukey’s test, P < 0.05). 906

907

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

41

Table 1 PCR primers employed in this study

Primer Sequence (5’- 3’)

MATLocus AGTCACATCAAGATCGTTTATGG

MATa ACTCCACTTCAAGTAAGAGTTTG

MATα GCACGGAATATGGGACTACTTCG

pdelfw TAGCAGATGCGCGCACCTGCGTTGTTACCACAACTCTTATGAGGCCC

GCGGAGTGGTCGGCTGGAGATCGG

pdelrv ATGCTTTCTGAAAACACGACTATTCTGATGGCTAACGGTGAAATTAA

AGACATCGAGCCGTTATGGCGGGCATC

Primer set: MATLocus/MATa/MATα (the DNA sequence present at the MATLocus); pdelfw/pdelrv

(deletion cassettes amplification).

908

909

910

911

912

913

914

915

916

917

918

919

920

921

922

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

42

Table 2 Flocculation ability of different yeast strains 923

Strain Description Flocculation percentage (SD)*

LBCM92 Parental diploid strain MATa/α 92.9 (1.0) j,i

LBCM78 Parental diploid strain MATa/α 43.7 (3.9) b

78-2B Segregant haploid from LBCM78 MATα 55.4 (1.0) c,d

92-11c Segregant haploid from LBCM92 MATa 90.4 (0.7) j

92-17d Segregant haploid from LBCM92 MATa 91.4 (1.4) j,i

92-16f Segregant haploid from LBCM92 MATa 99.0 (0.4) i

B16 Hybrid diploid MATa/α a 63.8 (0.2) e,f,g

B22 Hybrid diploid MATa/α a 70.1 (0.4) g,h,i

C28 Hybrid diploid MATa/α a 55.5 (0.3) c,d,e

C33 Hybrid diploid MATa/α a 44.6 (1.9) b

92 IX (7) Parental diploid strain MATa/a 93.8 (1.1) j,i

78 a34 (15) Parental diploid strain MATα/α 41.9 (2.4) b

C2 Hybrid tetraploid MATa/α b 28.3 (2.1) a

C3 Hybrid tetraploid MATa/α b 28.9 (2.1) a

C4 Hybrid tetraploid MATa/α b 45.2 (3.7) b

C1-2a Segregant diploid from C1 MATα b 65.3 (0.7) f,g,h

C1-8c Segregant diploid from C1 MATa/α b 68.7 (6.7) f,g,h,i

C2-1d Segregant diploid from C2 MATα b 91.4 (0.4) j,i

C2-8h Segregant diploid from C2 MATa/α b 73.3 (0.0) h,i

C3-7b Segregant diploid from C3 MATa b 90.8 (5.0) j,i

C4-1g Segregant diploid from C4 MATα b 95.4 (2.9) j,i

B15-1d Segregant diploid from B15 MATa/α b 75.2 (0.3) i

B15-7c Segregant diploid from B15 MATa/α b 56.5 (0.5) c,d,e

C13-4h Segregant diploid from C13 MATa/α b 61.5 (0.3) d,e,f

C13-4f Segregant diploid from C13 MATα b 67.6 (0.1) f,g,h,i

C14-2c Segregant diploid from C14 MATa/α b 62.6 (0.2) d,e,f,g

C16-6a Segregant diploid from C16 MATα b 50.3 (0.4) b,c

*Values are the mean and standard deviation of two independent experiments. Means followed by different 924 letters are significantly different by the Tukey’s test, P < 0.05; aHybrid originated from haploid-to-haploid 925 mating; bHybrid originated from diploid-to-diploid mating. 926

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

on February 1, 2019 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from