39
BABASAHEB GAWDE INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES SEMESTER IV SUBMITTED TO: PROF. GANACHRI MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM

New Final MCS Ppt_1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: New Final MCS Ppt_1

BABASAHEB GAWDE INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES

SEMESTER IV

SUBMITTED TO:PROF. GANACHRI

MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM

Page 2: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Group member

Nitin manke- 47

Forum parmar-50

Prkash thakkar- 59

Alok avasthi- 61

Ritesh shirsat- 102

Page 3: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Q1. What are transfer pricing and its objectives? When market based transfer prices are most appropriate?

Definition: Transfer PricingA transfer price is the internal price charged by a selling

department, division, or subsidiary of a company for a raw material, component, or finished good or service which is supplied to a buying department, division, or subsidiary of the same company.

Transfer pricing refers to the setting, analysis, documentation, and adjustment of charges made between related companies for goods, services, or use of property including intangible property.

The concept of transfer pricing is fundamentally aimed at stimulating external market conditions within the organization so that the managers of individual business units are motivated to perform well.

Page 4: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Objective of Transfer Pricing:

It should provide unit with the relevant information it needs to determine the optimum trade-off between company cost and revenues.

It should bring goal correspondence decision i.e., the system should be designed so that decision that improve business unit profit will also improve company profits.

It should help to measure the economic performance of the individual business units.

The system should be simple to understand and easy to administer.

Thus, from the objective, it is understandable that the Transfer price is mainly transferring of goods and services from one unit to another where much important is not given to accounting basis but also to all other effect.

Page 5: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Methods of Transfer Pricing

Market-based Transfer PricingWhen the outside market for the good is well-defined, competitive,

and stable, firms often use the market price as an upper bound for the transfer price. 

When the outside market is neither competitive nor stable, internal decision making may be distorted by dependence on market-based transfer prices.

Negotiated Transfer Pricing The firm does not specify rules for the determination of transfer

prices. Divisional managers are encouraged to negotiate a mutually agreeable transfer price.

Cost-based Transfer PricingIn the absence of an established market price many companies base

the transfer price on the production cost of the supplying division.

Page 6: New Final MCS Ppt_1

When market based transfer price are more appropriate?

Microeconomic theory shows that when divisional managers attempt to maximize divisional profits, a market-based transfer price supports their incentives with owners’ incentives of maximizing overall corporate profits.

Market based transfer price appropriate, if the selling profit center can sell

all of its product to either insider or outsider and if the buying center can obtain all of its requirement from either outsider or insider.

The market price represent the opportunity cost to the seller of selling the product inside. This is because if the product were not sold inside ,it would be sell outside .

From company point of view , the relevant cost of the product is the market price because that is the amount of cash that has been forgone by selling inside .

Page 7: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Other situation market based transfer price are more appropriate :-

Competent people:-

Manager should be interested in long-run as well as the short-run performance of their

responsibility center.

Good Atmosphere:-

Manager must regard profitability, as measure in their income statement , as an important

goal and a significant consideration in the judgment of their performance.

Freedom to source:-

Alternative source should exist, and manager should be permitted to choose the alternative

that is in their own best interests. The buying manger should be free to buy from outside, and

selling manager should be free to sell outside. In this circumstance, the transfer price policy

simply gives the manager of each profit center the right to deal with either insider or outsider.

The market thus establishes the transfer price.

Full information:-

Manager must know about available alternatives and relevant cost and revenues of each.

Negotiation:-

There should smoothly working mechanism for negotiating contract between business units.

Page 8: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Q2. What do you understand by investment centre? Explain 2 different methods by which the performance of this canters are measured. Also discuss their advantages and disadvantages

Page 9: New Final MCS Ppt_1

It is a classification used for business units within an enterprise.

The essential element of an investment center is that it is treated as a unit which is measured against its use of capital.

Mantra to govern investment centre is

“Profitable the case then invest else disinvest.”

Investment centre

Page 10: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Objective:

To make sound investment decisionCovers responsibilities of all the other responsibility centersIt is concerned with the profit earned against the assets employedIt is interested in earning profit and using the assets at its disposal

in most effective manner

Page 11: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Task - Effective utilization of factor

Investment centre

Profit centre

Revenue centre Cost centre

Task- Earn Profit

Task- Generate sales Task- control costs

Investment centre relation with other centre:

Page 12: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Formal relationship possible-

Inputs (Money invested in carrying

out the task)

Task/Work

Outputs (Money Profits earned)

Profits earned are related to Capital employed

EXAMPLE

Page 13: New Final MCS Ppt_1

To successful implement an investment centre controller must deliberate on following

considerations/issues

Decision rights need to be granted to centre manager about –Input mix – Labour, material, suppliesProduct mix Selling priceCapital investment

Performance measure to be used –Actual ROIActual Residual income i.e. EVAActual ROI and RI in comparison with budgeted ROI

Typically used when –Responsibility centre manager has knowledge about correct price/quantityResponsibility centre manager has knowledge to select optimal product mix

Page 14: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Performance measures for Investment Centre

It is the profitability ratio which relates the profits to the investment.

Investment in turn represents the assets based utility by the unit to earn the profit.

It emphasizes the net present value concept in performance evaluation over accounting standards.

It looks mare to long tern then short term decisions.

ROI EVA

Page 15: New Final MCS Ppt_1

3. What do you understand by non-profit organization? How do these organizations price their products? What criteria are used to measure their performance?

Page 16: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Non profit organization (NPO) is refers to an organization that uses surplus revenues to achieve its goals rather than to distribute them as profit or dividends.

A non-profit company is like any other Company. There is only one important difference. It is not supposed to make profits. In other words, it does not exist for commercial gain.

While Non-profit organizations are permitted to generate surplus revenues they must be retained by the organization for its self-preservation, expansion, or plans.

Page 17: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Characteristics of Not-for-profit organizations (NPOs)

The objective of such organizations is not to make profit but to provide service to its members .

The main source of income is admissions fees, subscriptions, donations, grant-in-aid, etc.

They also prepare their accounts following the same accounting principles and systems that are followed by business for profit organizations that are run with an objective to earn profits.

Page 18: New Final MCS Ppt_1

PRODUCT PRICING

A full cost price is sum of direct cost, indirect cost and perhaps a small allowance for increasing the organization equity. This principle is applies to services that are directly related to the organization objective. Pricing for peripheral activity should be market based. Thus a NP hospital should price its health care services at full cost.

Page 19: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Measurement of NPO Performance

The best indicators of the performance of a NPO are generally not measurable in rupee (currency) terms, though rupee is the language of financial reporting. It, thus, follows that it is more difficult to measure performance in a Not-For-Profit Organization than in a for-profit organization.

Indeed the research shows that most NPOs are attempting results measurement of some type, but all are struggling with developing quantitative measures to track their work’s impact on their mission.

Page 20: New Final MCS Ppt_1

4. Explain the element of control and how each element is helping the management control, with diagram.

Page 21: New Final MCS Ppt_1

An organization must also be controlled; that is, devices must be in the place to ensure that is strategic intentions are achieved. But controlling the organization is much more complicated than controlling a car.

Page 22: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Element of control system:

Every control system has at least four elements:

1. Detector- information about what is happening

2. Assessor- comparison with standard

3. Effectors- behavior alteration, if needed

Control device

Entity being controlled

Page 23: New Final MCS Ppt_1

A detector or sensor- a device that measures what is actually happening in the process being controlled.

An assessor- the device that determine the significance of what is actually happening by comparing it with standard or expectation of what should happen.

An effector – a device (often called feedback) that alter the behavior if the assessor indicates the need to do so.

A communication network- device that transmit information between the detector and assessor and between the assessor and the effector.

Page 24: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Steps in control system

Page 25: New Final MCS Ppt_1

• Balance scorecard

• Interactive control

• Internal control

Short Note:

Page 26: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Balance scorecard

Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a performance management tool Comprehensive view

Implementing a Balanced Scorecard

We can summarize the implantation of a balanced scorecard in four general steps; 1. Define strategy. 2. Define measure of strategy. 3. Integrate measures into the management system. 4. Review measures and result frequently. Each of these steps is iterative, requiring the participation of senior executive and employees throughout the organization

Page 27: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Difficulties in implementing Balanced Scorecard

The following problems unless suitably dealt with, could limit the usefulness of the balanced scorecard approach:

Poor correlation between nonfinancial measures and result. Fixation on financial result. No mechanism for improvement. Measures overload.

Page 28: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Interactive control

Page 29: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Internal Control

Internal control is the process designed to ensure reliable financial reporting, effective and efficient operations, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

internal control objectives relate to the reliability of financial reporting, timely feedback on the achievement of operational or strategic goals, and compliance with laws and regulations.

Roles and responsibilities in Internal Control

Management

Board of Directors

Auditors Limitations

Page 30: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Case Study

North Country Auto

Page 31: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Background

Five Departments i.e. the new cars sales and used cars sales, service, parts, body shop and oil change ― operated as part of one business.

New leader assumed that the existing compensation system not enough for motivating the employees.

He developed a system for so that each department will be treated as decentralized profit centers to track the departmental performance effectively.

Page 32: New Final MCS Ppt_1

This new system requires that cost be broken down per department. Also, the bonuses per each department head will be based on departmental gross profits.

Earlier the Department Managers were paid salaries and a year-end bonus from Company profits.

Issues of setting of transfer prices and allocation of costs and profits between departments, as well as intercompany transactions, the divisional structure (use of profit or cost center), and the proper allocation of company profits.

Background

Page 33: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Issues

Problem The different departments of North Country Auto, must

choose between three pricing systems: base on market price, full retail better than others, and based on book value.

Also, the company must decide whether they should continue treating each department independently in order to gain huge profits considering that the manager’s incentives are determined upon the department’s earnings.

Page 34: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Executive Summary

North Country Auto Inc. was restructured by George Liddy so that each department will operate as an independent profit center.

However, a recent new car purchase sparked friction and disagreements among division heads on setting of transfer prices and allocation of costs and profits.

Issues that needed to be resolved include setting of transfer prices between departments, formalizing intercompany transactions, the divisional structure (use of profit or cost center), and the proper allocation of company profits among departments.

Page 35: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Solution

Return On Sales:A ratio widely used to evaluate a company's operational

efficiency. ROS is also known as a firm's "operating profit margin". It is calculated using this formula:

= Net income before interest and tax / sales

Page 36: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Return On Sales

This measure is helpful to management, providing insight into how much profit is being produced per dollar of sales.

As with many ratios, it is best to compare a company's ROS over time to look for trends, and compare it to other companies in the industry.

An increasing ROS indicates the company is growing more efficient, while a decreasing ROS could signal looming financial troubles.

In some instances, a low return on sales can be offset by increased sales.

Page 37: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Hybrid Transfer Pricing

A hybrid transfer-pricing system would be the best system to implement.

Since the departments rely on each other to maximize efficiency, it seems unfair to charge full retail price within your own organization.

Furthermore, some of the departments (service) have a higher standard profit margin, on average, then some of the other departments (sales).

Page 38: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Incentives should be based on company profits.A better system should be established such that managers of the

two departments are given incentives based not on the gross profits of their respective departments but on the profits of the company as a whole.

This would help ensure that conflicts of the two departments will be lessened and that the two departments will no longer compete but will work together to enrich the value of the firm.

Here we can use return on sales ratio to determine the effectiveness of respective departments. This will be enough for Mr. Liddys’ expectations and it will solve any inter-departmental conflict too.

Recommendation

Page 39: New Final MCS Ppt_1

Thank you