Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nanomagnetic Studies on Thin Films and Multilayers with Spin Polarized Scanning
Tunneling Microscopy
Herman van Kempen
IMMRadboud University Nijmegen
Madrid, February 1, 2005
A.L. Vazquez de Parga
M.M.J. BischoffT.K.Yamada T. Mizoguchi
Colleagues
We are especially grateful to D.T. Piercefor supplying the Fe whiskers and to G.M.M. Heijnen,
R. Robles, E. Martinez, and A. Vega for computer calculations
Spin electronic devices
10 nm bit size:>5 T bit / inch2
In 2010
We need an instrument to study nm-scale
magnetism
Spin-polarized scanning tunneling spectroscopy (SP-STS)
allows study of magnetism on sub-nanometer scale.
Scientific interest
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
STM magnetic imaging
magnetic tip
magnetic sample
Fe-coated W tip
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
(R. Wiesendanger et al. Solid State Com. 119 (2001) 431)
SampleDOS
DOS
DOS
(dI/dV)/T = Spin-resolved sample DOS
EF
EF
EF
Mechanism of Spin Polarized-STM
Fe-coated W tip
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
Toyo Yamada
Maarten Bischoff
Sample : Mn/Fe(001)
Fe(001)
Mn(001) Different sample DOS
? The same DOS
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
SEMPA measurements suggested antiferromagnetic coupling. J.MMM. 222 (2000) 13D.T. Pierce et al.:
Fe(001)-whisker
Mn(001) films
0.14 nm
0.16 nm
Fe(001)
1st Mn
5th Mn
Sample : Mn/Fe(001)
Surf.Sci. 516 (2002) 179T.K. Yamada et al.:
BCT:Body-centered tetragonal
IMM, Radboud University of Nijmegen
Mn grown at 370 K (<4x10-10mbar)
Results with non-magnetic tips (W tips)
7
6
8
8
89
9
97
6
8
8
89
9
9
dI/dV map at +0.2 V
150 nm x 150 nm( -0.5 V, 0.5 nA )
7.2 ML Mn/Fe(001)Topographic image
Sample voltage [V]-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
dI/d
V[n
A/V
]
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5 6789
IMM, University of Nijmegen
89
10
9.5 ML Mn/Fe(001)
100 nm x 100 nm( -0.5 V, 0.5 nA )
10
11
11
12
Results with ferromagnetic tips (Fe on W tips)
Sample voltage [V]-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
dI/d
V[n
A/V
]
0.5
1.5
2.589
1011
dI/dV map at +0.2 V
89
1011
11
10
9
3 nm
Ferromagnetic Mn layers coupled anti-ferromagneticallyT.K. Yamada et al. PRL 90, (2003) 056803
T.K. Yamada et al. APL 82, (2003) 1437
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
Topographic image
89
10
9.5 ML Mn/Fe(001)
100 nm x 100 nm( -0.5 V, 0.5 nA )
10
11
11
12
Results with ferromagnetic tips (Fe on W tips)
Sample voltage [V]-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
dI/d
V[n
A/V
]
0.5
1.5
2.589
1011
dI/dV map at +0.2 V
89
1011
11
10
9
3 nm
Ferromagnetic Mn layers coupled anti-ferromagneticallyT.K. Yamada et al. PRL 90, (2003) 056803
T.K. Yamada et al. APL 82, (2003) 1437
Topographic image
10 nmM
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
Magnetic resolution (Fe-coated W tips)
Hidden Fe step0.02 nm step height
dI/dV map at +0.2 V
70 nm x 70 nm
7
7
5
8
6
7.2 ML Mn/Fe(001)Topographic image
150 nm x 150 nm( -0.6 V, 0.5 nA )
7
6
8
5
6
7
Fe MnMnMnMn
Mn
Fe
(without topological effect)
a*Tanh[(x-xo)/w/2]+b
w = 0.4 nm
Minimum w < 0.5 nmT.K. Yamada et al. APL 82, (2003) 1437
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
2
1
0dI
/dV
[nA
/V]
3
-0.5-1.0 1.00.50.0
Positive voltagesetpoint
Sample voltage [V]
-0.5-1.0 1.00.50.0
0
-30
dI/d
VA
[%] 30
4
2
0
dI/d
V[n
A/V
]
-0.5-1.0 1.00.50.0
Sample voltage [V]
1
3Negative voltagesetpoint
odd layerseven layers
How to get sample polarization: Asymmetry of dI/dV
(dI/dV) – (dI/dV) (dI/dV) + (dI/dV)
= Ptip PsampleAdI/dV = ??
IMM, Radboud University of Nijmegen
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
To get ρ one needs T
Origin of the contrastNegative-voltage setpoint
Sample voltage [V]
dI/d
V[n
A/V
]
LDOS = dI/dV / T
T: tunneling probability(Ukraintsev, PRB 53 11176)
0
1
2
3
-2 -1 0 1 2 3Sample voltage [V]
(dI/d
V)/T
= L
DO
S
Peak 2 Peak 1
oddeven
Peak 1 :
two dz2 surface states in the “minority” band
Peak 2 :
dz2 surface state in the “majority” band
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
-2
-1
0
1
2
Ene
rgy
[eV
]
Peak 1
Peak 2
Γ Χ
Band structure
Band structure: G.M.M. Heijnen
△Negative voltage setpoint Positive voltage setpoint Different tip (setpoint –0.5 V)
Calculation (G.M.M. Heijnen)
-1 0 1 2Sample voltage [V]
A
[
%]
(dI/d
V)/T
-20
20100
-10
-2 3
A(dI/dV)/T: independent of Different set point voltage different tips
[(dI/dV) /T] – [(dI/dV)/T]
[(dI/dV) /T] + [(dI/dV)/T] = Ptip(EF) Psample(eV) for V>0
(= Ptip(eV) Psample(EF) for V<0)
A(dI/dV)/T =
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
Sub-nanometer resolution in magnetic contrast for technological interesting materials can be obtained.
Conclusions
Quantitative information on the sample polarization.
*
*
* Magnetic multilayers can also be studied with this method.
• Fe/Mn/Fe(100)
• AuMn/Mn/Fe(100)
•Screw dislocation Mn/Fe(100)
Studies of more complex magnetic structures with SP-STM
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
BCC
BCT
Mn impurities: 5-10 %
Mn
Fe1234567
Fe
Fe/Mn/Fe(001) multilayers
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
1.5ML Fe on Mn/Fe(100) grown at 300K (100nm X 85nm). (b) and (c) measured with two W/Fe tips with different magnetization Directions.
BCC
BCT
Ferro
Mn impurities: 5-10 %
Non-collinear A-F coupling
Mn
Fe1234567
Fe
Fe/Mn/Fe(001) multilayers: conclusions
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
Mn
Fe
AuMn/Mn/Fe(001) multilayers
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
AuMn
AuMn/Mn/Fe(001)
2.2ML Au deposited at RT.An ordered alloy is formed.
6.6nm x 6.6nm
Mn
Fe
AuMn/Mn/Fe(001) multilayers: Magnetic structure
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
AuMn
0.7 ML Au on Mn measured with Fe/W tip
Calculations:R. Robles, E. Martinez, A. Vega
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
Screw dislocation in Fe(100) covered by Mn layers
100nm x 100nm
dI/dV of Mn/Fe(100) measured with Fe/W-tip
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
Complicated magnetic structure around a screw dislocation
400nm x 333nm
Screw dislocation
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
IMM, Radboud University Nijmegen
Conclusions
• Sub-nanometer resolution in magnetic contrast for technological interesting materials and complicatedmultilayer structures can be obtained.
• Quantitative information on the sample polarization.
• Intermixing around interfaces can play an important role.