15
Negative Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: A pilot Study Antoine Riprêt Tom Tenenbaum Lesueur Monica Tye Andrea Vindiola Alexis Alfroy Baptiste Mulliez #ViralMarketingQuestions

Negative Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A pilot Study

  • Upload
    kale

  • View
    44

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Negative Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A pilot Study. Antoine Riprêt Tom Tenenbaum Lesueur Monica Tye Andrea Vindiola Alexis Alfroy Baptiste Mulliez. # ViralMarketingQuestions. What is Word of Mouth ?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

Negative Word-of-Mouth by Dissatisfied

Consumers: A pilot Study

Antoine RiprêtTom Tenenbaum Lesueur

Monica TyeAndrea Vindiola

Alexis AlfroyBaptiste Mulliez

#ViralMarketingQuestions

Page 2: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

What is Word of Mouth?

• In marketing, WOM is an unpaid form of promotion—oral or written—in which satisfied customers tell other people how much they like a business, product, service, or event.

• WOM is the passing of information from person to person by oral or written communication

• If customers are dissatisfied they can create negative WOM, telling others about their bad experiences with a company, product or service.

Page 3: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

5 principles of WOM

In the case of the WOM, the message has to be:• Credible• Repeatable• Social• Respectful • The impact must be measurable

• In the case of the NWOM, the rules are the same.• i.e. : broken bike chain

Page 4: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

Your point of view

Page 5: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

The dissatisfaction proccess

Hirschmann (1970) Various possibilities when a customer is dissatisfied

– Complain to the supplier (voice)• Loyal => Voice• Unloyal => exit

– Exit (to another supplier)• Exit costs • Customers loyalty works as a

barrier to exit – WOM (talk negatively to friends and

relatives) – Some people don’t do anything

Page 6: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

Example of Negative Word-of Mouth

• British Airways lost customer luggage

• He spent $1,000 for his tweets to be promoted

• The tweets could be seen by more than 300,000 followers of British Airways

Page 7: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

Findings in negative WOM• WOM and Problem Severity

As the severity of the problem associated with dissatisfaction increased, the tendency to engage in negative WOM increased.

• WOM and AttributionsWhen the greater the blame for dissatisfaction is placed on marketing institutions than on the consumer, there will be more WOM.

Page 8: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

Findings in negative WOM• WOM and Retailer ResponsivenessIndividuals who have low confidence in the effectiveness of making complaints are more likely to tell others about their dissatisfactions than those expecting remedy

The more negative a customer’s perceptions of retailer responsiveness to complaints, the more likely the individual is to engage in negative WOM.

Page 9: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study
Page 10: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

Issues of negative WOM• A customer would better want to express his dissatifaction

than his satisfaction.

• Words used and implication of the consumer might be stronger in negative WOM than in positive (strong feelings involved)

• Negative word of mouth has a bigger impact on the person that hears it than positive

• Fake WOM (Yelp, Trip Advisor, etc…)

Page 11: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

Influence of negative WOM on diffusion of innovation• NWOM of innovators and specialists influence followersAvoid NWOM especially at the begining

• NWOM would be less critical if done during the majority of difusion

Page 12: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

Antecedents to satisfaction with service recovery from W. Andreassen (1998)• Managment discovers the organization’s inability to satisfy customers via:

Exit customer stops buying Voice complaints

• Service recovery: When companies respond to dissatisfied customers’ complaints.

• Service failure triggers negative affect and emotions in the customer • Service recovery is needed to change these to positive ones

• FINDINGS: Low expectations encourage positive disconfirmation: POSITIVE AFFECT

AND EVEN WOM

High expectations encourage negative disconfirmation: NEGATIVE WOM, NO REPURCHASE

Page 13: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

Conclusions and ImplicationsIf minor dissatisfaction experienced• Consumer’s responses are minimal• Neither complain or spread negative WOM

If dissatisfaction is serious:• Consumers complain

If complaints are encouraged:

Retailer can remedy the situation

Win back a customer who may also make positive reports to others

Even if complaints are not completely settled, the customer is more likely to repurchase than if no complaint is made.

Page 14: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

Conclusions and ImplicationsIf complaints are discouraged: - Fewer consumers complain

– These may tell others of their unsatisfactory experience – May not repurchase in the future

There will be some deffects and dissatisfied customers, but the way management deals with these dissatisfactions can have important impacts on brand and store image.

NEGATIVE WOM

May avert WOM and may even create positive WOM

-Toll-free telephone numbers to receive complaints-Store signs-Positive employee attitudes

-Detailed warranty-Complaint procedures information on labels

Page 15: Negative  Word-of- Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers : A  pilot Study

Conclusions and ImplicationsConsumer perceptions of institutional responsiveness depended on which product was the source of dissatisfaction

• Perceived responsiveness for complaints about appliances was lower than for clothing items– More expensive to remedy a dissatisfaction concerning an

appliance– Retailers may be reluctanct to make these expenditures

and make complaint procedures difficult