27
UGPTI 2019-2021 - Road Needs Assessment: NDDOT State Needs Study and Local Roads & Bridge Needs Study WDEA Annual Meeting October 31, 2019 Tim Horner – Program Director Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute

NDDOT State Needs Study and Local Roads & Bridge Needs Study · 2020. 12. 1. · AASHTO-93 SAS Algorithms ... Local Roads Needs Study Operation Prairie Dog. OPD Provision for Local

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • UGPTI 2019-2021 - Road Needs Assessment:

    NDDOT State Needs Study

    and

    Local Roads & Bridge Needs Study

    WDEA Annual Meeting

    October 31, 2019

    Tim Horner – Program Director

    Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute

  • Today’s Presentation

    • Who is NDSU-UGPTI

    • Infrastructure Needs Studies History

    • State Highway Needs Study Effort

    • Current County, Township, Tribal Road

    and Bridge Needs for HB 1066 - OPD

    pg. 2

  • • Who is NDSU-UGPTI

    • Upper Great Plains Transportation

    Institute -NDSU-UGPTI

    • MISSION:

    • Providing innovative transportation

    research, education, and outreach

    that promote the safe and efficient

    movement of people and goods.

    pg. 3

  • • Who is NDSU-UGPTI

    • CORE VALUES:• UGPTI staff and students are dedicated to:• Service — Providing QUALITY SERVICE to our stakeholders• Excellence — Achieving EXCELLENCE in our research, education and

    outreach efforts

    • Reputation — Maintaining a level of TRUST and an exceptional REPUTATION

    • Value — Adding VALUE and KNOWLEDGE to the transportation community

    • Integrity — Demonstrating INTEGRITY and RELIABILITY in our efforts and interactions

    • Creativity / Innovation — Encouraging CREATIVITY and INNOVATON• Education — Advancing LEARNING opportunities by promoting

    continuing education

    pg. 4

  • • Who is NDSU-UGPTI

    History:

    UGPTI was created in 1967 by the ND

    Legislature to study the unique

    transportation challenges facing

    agricultural producers and processors in

    the region.

    pg. 5

  • • Who is NDSU-UGPTI

    Legislation

    • NDCC 54-53-01. Upper great plains

    transportation institute - Establishment.There is hereby established an upper great plains transportation

    institute. Such institute must be administered by and in

    conjunction with the North Dakota state university of agriculture

    and applied science. The president and administration of the

    North Dakota state university of agriculture and applied

    science are responsible for the selection of personnel for and

    the administration of the institute.

    pg. 6

  • ND chamber of commerce.

    ND public service commission

    ND farmers union.

    ND grain growers association.

    ND wheat commission.

    ND department of commerce.

    ND grain dealers association.

    ND motor carriers association.

    ND aeronautics commission.

    ND department of

    transportation.

    ND department of agriculture.

    ND associated general

    contractors

    ND railway industry, appointed

    ND manufacturing sector

    ND association of counties.

    The North Dakota league of

    cities.

    Lignite energy council.

    member of the dakota transit

    association.

    ND corn council.

    pg. 7

    NDSU-UGPTI Advisory council

  • • Advanced Traffic Analysis Center (ATAC)

    • Agriculture & Freight Center• Center for Surface Mobility

    Applications & Real-time Simulation environments (SMARTSeSM)

    • DOT Support Center (DOTSC)• The Mountain-Plains Consortium

    (MPC)

    • North Dakota Local Technical Assistance Program (NDLTAP)

    • Small Urban and Rural Transit Center (SURTC)

    • Transportation Learning Network (TLN)

    • Transportation Safety Systems Center (TSSC)

    • Road and Bridge Infrastructure (RBI)

    pg. 8

    NDSU-UGPTI Primary Programs

  • Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute• Infrastructure Needs Studies History

    – 2007: NDDOT

    – 2009: NDDOT Level of Service Study

    – 2010: ND Association of Oil and Gas Producing

    Counties/ND Commerce Department – Agriculture

    Producer Groups

    – 2011-13: North Dakota Legislature

    – 2013-15: North Dakota Legislature

    – 2013-15: NDDOT Cities

    – 2015-16: North Dakota Legislature

    – 2019-20: NDDOT Statewide Needs

    – 2019-20: North Dakota Legislature

    pg. 9

    http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAcQjRw&url=http://www.ndplannedparenthoodadvocate.org/2014/12/&ei=uzuUVfHLIc31yATNmLegDA&bvm=bv.96952980,d.cGU&psig=AFQjCNE-AnuJk97fhlFhaHs87--f-offhw&ust=1435864374272319

  • Trends Impacting Roadways in ND

    • Oil production

    • Changing crop mix

    • Highway funding levels and sources

    • Population changes

    • Construction Inflation and aggregate

    resource depletion

    • Changing road maintenance practices

  • State Needs Study 2019-20

    • Components of Study

    – Updated Traffic Forecasts for State Routes

    – FHWA-HERS-ST Needs Analysis for Pavement

    and Capacity – Rural and Urban

    – Parallel Rural Pavement Analysis with

    AASHTO-93 SAS Algorithms

    – Bridge Analysis

    – Bikeway Ped Analysis as per ND MOVES

    – Freight Plan System Bottlenecks

  • Freight Constraints – State System

  • Local Roads Needs Study

    Operation Prairie Dog

  • OPD Provision for Local Road Study

    HB 1066 section 4:

    the state treasurer shall distribute the

    remaining money in the fund to non - oil-

    producing counties based on the most

    recent data compiled by the upper great

    plains transportation institute regarding

    North Dakota's county, township, and

    tribal road and bridge infrastructure

    needs.

    pg. 15

  • OPD Provision for Local Road Study

    HB 1066 section 4:

    The total estimated road and bridge

    investment needs for each county is the

    twenty-year estimate for unpaved and

    paved road and bridge needs as

    identified by the upper great plains

    transportation institute.

    pg. 16

  • OPD Provision for Local Road Study

    HB 1066 section 4:

    If the data compiled by the upper great

    plains transportation institute includes

    more than one twenty-year estimate for

    the total needs of each county, the state

    treasurer shall use an average of the

    twenty-year estimates for each county

    pg. 17

  • Data Collected for 2019-20 Study

    • 1,000+ vehicle counts and classifications by

    NDDOT & UGPTI (students and consultants)

    • 6000 miles of pavement video image and ride

    data via 3 smartphone applications

    • Gravel costing surveys for 53 counties

    • NBIS data on about 2,300 local bridges

    pg. 18

  • Created for the 2019-20 Study

    • A statewide TransCAD truck flow model

    – Updated Oil & Gas Data from ND Mineral Resources• Inbound fresh water

    • Outbound crude oil

    • Outbound produced water

    – Updated Agricultural Forecasts• Yield and crop mix

    • An AASHTO-93 Pavement Deterioration Model

    to predict pavement needs and remaining life

    pg. 19

  • 2019-20: Gravel Cost and Practices Surveys

    • Survey of both counties and townships

    • 2019-20 study

    – County survey advisory group

    – Surveys went out mid-October

    – Webinar held to provide instructions and field

    questions

    – 53 Counties and about 1600 organized TWPs

    • Responses reflective of actual improvement and

    maintenance activities is critical

    • Cost vary by county

    – Cost of materials and haul

    – Overlay frequencies

    – Dust and stabilization practices

    pg. 20

  • Gravel Cost and Practices Surveys• Aggregate (gravel) cost at pit

    • Placement cost

    • Transportation cost from pit to roads

    • Dust suppressant usage/cost

    • Stabilization usage/cost

    • Intermediate practices

    – Double chip seal/armor coat

    – Note: Gravel Mtce. Costs

    – Vary a great deal

    pg. 21

  • 2019-20 Pavement Data Collection

    • Condition data collection– Collected data with NDSU Students using smartphones

    – Approx. 6,000 miles of paved county roads

    – Ride data collected with Pavvet, RoadBump, and

    Roadroid

    – Video images collected with RIC

    • Scoring and reporting of data– NDSU students will do some manual scoring for validation

    – NDDOT and MnRoad Sections will be used for calibration

    – Data will be referenced to roadways to provide on-line

    mapping

    – All data will be integrated into AASHTO 93 model

    pg. 22

  • Pavement Condition Status - 2019

  • 2019 Traffic Data Collection

    • Data collection– 1/3 collected by NDSU students and 1/3 by contractor

    – NDDOT normal count schedule for remaining 1/3.

    – 450 counts added to the NDDOT current and past counts.

    – Most counts included truck classification

    • Traffic data processing– Use ATR’s from around state to factor the data

    – Use classification data to factor the volume counts

    – Input all traffic data into travel demand model

    • Traffic data reporting– Specific count location data will be made available with an

    interactive map on the Web.

    pg. 24

  • 2019-20 Other Data• Geographic Roadway Inventory Tool

    – Purpose: Provide Counties easy on-line tool to enter data

    – Pavement type and pavement age

    – Strength data – pavement and base thickness and type

    – Collected in 2014– Shoulder width information etc...

    – Previous FWD will be used to supplement for sub-grade strength

    pg. 25

  • Created for the 2019-20 Study

    • A bridge deterioration and improvement

    model.

    – A study of bridges located on minimum maintenance

    roads – approximately 400 bridges excluded from the analysis – this work was done in 2014

    pg. 26

  • NDSU-UGPTI Study Team

    • Denver Tolliver – UGPTI Director

    • Alan Dybing – Associate Research Fellow– Traffic Modeling/HERS-ST Modeling, Gravel Road Survey

    • Tim Horner – Program Director– Pavement/Bridge Costing, Project Coordination

    • Brad Wentz – Program Director– Pavement Condition, Traffic Data, County Scenarios, GRIT

    • Satpal Wadhwa – Traffic Network, Ag Modeling

    • Dale Heglund– LTAP Program Director – County TWP Coordination and

    Communication

    pg. 27