12
NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel

C. L. Lorenzen and H. HeymannDepartment of Food Science

University of Missouri - Columbia

Page 2: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Background

Follow up to NCBA’s in-home irradiated beef patty research.

Color differences were noticed by consumers in the raw state.

Page 3: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Objectives

Evaluate irradiated and non-irradiated beef patties of good and poor color using trained descriptive analysis and consumer panels.

Evaluate irradiated and non-irradiated beef patties with an added antioxidant, rosemary extract, using a trained descriptive analysis panel.

Page 4: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Materials and Methods

Non-irradiated placebo, non-irradiated control, irradiated w/ rosemaryNon-irradiated w/ rosemary, irradiated good color, irradiated poor color

Page 5: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Materials and Methods, cont.

Descriptive attribute panel (n = 10)

AppearanceBrown, gray, red, moist appearance, and connective tissue

FlavorMeaty, stale, eggy, herb, and liver

MouthfeelOily mouthcoating/fatty, chewy/fibrous, and moist mouthfeel

Page 6: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Materials and Methods, cont.

Consumer panel (n = 94)

Dislike Extremely Like Extremely

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Overall Like

Liking of Tenderness

Liking of Juiciness

Liking of Flavor

Page 7: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Descriptive Analysis – Good vs. Poor Color

Attribute Control Placebo Good Color Poor Color

Brown 4.7ab 4.2b 4.8a 4.7ab

Gray 3.5a 3.9a 2.8b 2.8b

Red 1.1bc .9c 1.4ab 1.6a

Moist Appearance

5.3a 5.1a 4.9a 4.4b

Moist Mouthfeel

5.2ab 5.1ab 5.5a 4.7b

Means within a row lacking a common superscript differ (P < .05)

Page 8: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Consumer Acceptance – Good vs. Poor Color

Attribute Control Good Color Poor Color

Overall Liking

6.0 6.2 6.1

Tenderness Liking

6.0 6.3 6.3

Juiciness Liking

5.4b 5.9a 5.7ab

Flavor Liking

5.8 5.9 5.9

Means within a row lacking a common superscript differ (P < .05)

Page 9: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Descriptive Analysis – Rosemary Extract

Attribute Non-irradiated Irradiated

Gray 2.1b 2.8a

Meaty 2.8b 3.5a

Means within a row lacking a common superscript differ (P < .05)

Page 10: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Summary

Irradiation of beef patties resulted in differences in cooked color and moisture.

Irradiated patties with good color had higher juiciness liking scores than controls.

Page 11: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Summary, cont.

Addition of an antioxidant reduced color differences between irradiated and non-irradiated control patties.

Page 12: NCBA Beef Patty Irradiation Panel C. L. Lorenzen and H. Heymann Department of Food Science University of Missouri - Columbia

Conclusion

When panelists, trained and consumer, were not allowed to view raw patties there were very few differences between irradiated and non-irradiated patties.