3
Natural Resources of Rajasthan B ESIDES lack of irrigation, the other land problem in Rajas- than is that of uneconomic holdings Although agricultural holdings are sufficiently large in the desert areas and this is an unavoidable neces- sity there they become smaller and smaller as the fertile regions of Jaipur and Kotah divisions are reached, Fractionalisation of hold- ings is common in Kotah and Jaipur divisions. Even more serious than this is the problem of soil erosion which occurs throughout Rajasthan wind erosion in western Rajasthan, gully erosion around the banks of the Chambal, the Banas and other smaller rivers, and sheet erosion in the Udaipur, Kotah and Jaipur divisions. Erosion is aggravated by lack of forests, indiscriminate graz- ing by goats and cows and other wasteful methods of cultivation. It has become a very serious' prob- lem today. About ten years back, the Prime Minister of the then princely State of Mewar said: " If timely steps were not taken to pre- serve the forests, the fair fields of Udaipur would in course of the next generation be found deposited at the bottom of the Bay of Ben- gal." He was not exaggerating by any means. Besides, according to some of the agricultural experts, the soils of Rajasthan have also been gradually deteriorating for the last so many years and the use of heavy machinery is likely to im- poverish the already exhausted soils. Apart from the niggardliness of nature, among the other factors responsible for the stagnation of agriculture in Rajasthan must be counted the system of land tenure which has been prevalent in the past. About two-thirds of the land is non-khalsa, where there was no settlement and no fixed rent. It is only the khalsa lands which are settled. Now that the Jagir Abolition Act has been pass- ed, things are likely to change but the general trend of the land reform has been more in the direc- tion of the administrative improve- ments than that of fixation of fair rents, security of tenure and the general amelioration of the peasantry. Currently, when the for details regarding recent agra- rian legislation in Rajasthan, sec " Agra- rian Reforms in Rajasthan" by H. C. Saxena in the issue of February 16, 1952- J. M Joshi (Continued' from the previous issue) prices' of most agricultural produce are high, the incidence of land revenue may not appear to be so heavy for the peasantry. But most of the settlement officers in the princely States of Rajasthan had been apologetic in the past for fix- ing the assessment at a rate much higher than that prevailing in the then provinces of British India. The Darbars were not very particular about the problems of rural uplift and rural welfare with the result that man failed to use to his own advantage what little nature had given him. The most efficient agri- culturists in Rajasthan are the Jats who inhabit such a tract (the desert zone) that their skill could hardly avail against the whims of the rain- god. A great portion of land is held by Rajputs who are the worst agriculturists. In the division of Udaipur the Bhils who hold much land are no whit better than the aristocratic Rajputs in this respect. The Malis, Gujars, Bishnois, Meos, etc., are good agriculturists. But their , methods of cultivation are traditional, implements out-moded and the general agricultural equip- ment poor. The livestock is very healthy in western Rajasthan which is more due to climate than to the care and skill of the people to raise it. The defective system of market- ing of agricultural produce deprives the fanner of his legitimate gains. The co-operative movement is still very backward and covers only 3.25 per rent of the entire popula- tion of Rajasthan. The hold of the Mahajan in rural areas is un- disputed, though indebtedness varies, surprisingly enough, with the ferti- lity of the land in most places. Subsidiary occupations and urban arts and crafts are either decaying or are very badly organised. The Grow More Food campaign has not been very successful. The net result of this agricultural stagnation is, as already stated, that Rajasthan is deficient in staple food- grains to the extent of 50,000 tons a year. The population has been increasing by leaps and bounds since 1931 and was estimated at 1,52,97,979 souls at the 1951 Cen- sus. A peculiarity of the popula- tion growth of Rajasthan is that the rate has not been uniform from decade to decade. In 1881 the total population of Rajastan, exclusive of the 1,66,343 Bhils only enumerated by houses, was 1,01,02,049. Since then the popu- lation received a set-back in 1901 and again in 1921, with the result that in the period 1901-1941 the increase was only 7 per cent. As the Census Superintendent of 1931 observed: '' The variations from census to census resemble mighty swings of Nature's pendulum." While the great famine of 1899- 1900, popularly known as " Chap- pania Kal ", affected the Census of 1901, an epidemic of plague which broke out just before the Census of 1921 left its mark on the enumera- tion in the latter year. The net increase, however, since 1881 has still been 50 per cent. The den- sity works out at 117 persons per sq. mile which, as compared to most other parts of India, is very low. Rajasthan is, therefore, more of an under-developed than an over-populated State. Efforts should be directed, accordingly, to increas- ing the agricultural and industrial wealth of Rajasthan, though any further increase in the population should be discouraged by all means. If agriculturally Rajasthan is backward, industrially it is an infant State, Although the salt industry had developed on modern lines in the last quarter of the 19th cen- tury, and the cement factory at Lakheri started work early in the 20th century, the real industrial development of Rajasthan may be said to have commenced only dur- ing and after the Second World War. Rajasthan can now boast of a few organised industries, e.g., tex- tiles, sugar, cement, glass, match, minerals, oil-mills, small engineer- ing, marble and chemicals, etc., which can be greatly developed. Compilation of industrial statis- tics by the Department concerned is still not complete, nevertheless a brief review of the principal indus- tries may be attempted. At pre- sent we have 7 cotton textile mills equipped with about 70,000 spindles and 1,300 loorns. Unfortunately only 4 of them have been actually working for the last few years. In 1949-50 these mills consumed 43,300 bales of cotton and their annual production during the years 1947, 1948 and 1949 averaged about 15 million yards of cloth and 7 mil- lion yards of yarn. The production was far less than the requirements of the people. There are two sugar mills which produce more than 3,000 tons of 638

Natural Resources of Rajasthan - epw.in€¦ · Natural Resources of Rajasthan BESIDES lack of irrigation, the other land problem in Rajas-than is that of uneconomic holdings Although

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Natural Resources of Rajasthan - epw.in€¦ · Natural Resources of Rajasthan BESIDES lack of irrigation, the other land problem in Rajas-than is that of uneconomic holdings Although

N a t u r a l Resources of Rajasthan

BE S I D E S lack o f i r r i g a t i o n , the other l a n d p r o b l e m in Rajas-

t h a n is tha t of uneconomic holdings A l t h o u g h a g r i c u l t u r a l holdings are sufficiently large in the desert areas

a n d this is an unavoidable neces­sity there they become smaller a n d smaller as the fer t i le regions of J a ipu r a n d K o t a h divisions are reached, Frac t iona l i sa t ion of h o l d ­ings i s c o m m o n i n K o t a h a n d J a ipu r divisions.

Even more serious t h a n this is the p r o b l e m of soil erosion w h i c h occurs t h r o u g h o u t Rajas than w i n d erosion in western Rajas than, gu l ly erosion a r o u n d the banks of the C h a m b a l , the Banas a n d other smaller r ivers, a n d sheet erosion in the U d a i p u r , K o t a h a n d Ja ipur divisions. Erosion is aggravated by lack of forests, ind i sc r imina te graz­i n g by goats a n d cows a n d other wasteful methods of c u l t i v a t i o n . I t has become a very serious' p rob­l em today. A b o u t ten years back, the Pr ime M i n i s t e r of the then pr ince ly State o f M e w a r sa id : " I f t i m e l y steps were no t taken to pre­serve the forests, the fa i r fields of U d a i p u r w o u l d in course o f the next generat ion be f o u n d deposited a t the b o t t o m of the Bay of Ben­g a l . " He was no t exaggerat ing by any means. Besides, accord ing to some of the ag r i cu l tu ra l experts, the soils of Rajas than have also been gradua l ly de te r io ra t ing for the last so many years a n d the use of heavy mach ine ry is l ike ly to i m ­poverish the already exhausted soils.

A p a r t f r o m the niggardliness of na ture , among the other factors responsible for the stagnation of agr icu l tu re in Rajas than must be counted the system of l a n d tenure w h i c h has been prevalent i n the past. A b o u t two- th i rds o f the l a n d is non-khalsa, where there was no settlement a n d no f ixed rent . I t is on ly the khalsa lands w h i c h are settled. N o w tha t the Jagir A b o l i t i o n A c t has been pass­ed, things are l ike ly to change b u t the general t r end of the l a n d r e f o r m has been more in the direc­t i o n of the admin is t ra t ive improve ­ments than tha t of f ixat ion of fa i r rents, security of tenure a n d the general ame l io ra t ion of the peasantry. C u r r e n t l y , w h e n the

f o r details regarding recent agra­rian legislation in Rajasthan, sec " Agra­rian Reforms in Rajasthan" by H. C. Saxena in the issue of February 16, 1952-

J. M Joshi (Continued' from the previous issue)

prices' of most a g r i c u l t u r a l p roduce are h i g h , the incidence of l a n d revenue may no t appear to be so heavy for the peasantry. B u t most of the settlement officers in the pr ince ly States of Rajas than h a d been apologetic in the past for f i x ­i n g the assessment at a rate m u c h h igher t h a n tha t p r eva i l i ng i n the then provinces o f Br i t i sh I n d i a . T h e Darbars were no t very pa r t i cu l a r about the problems of r u r a l u p l i f t a n d r u r a l welfare w i t h the result tha t m a n fa i led to use to his o w n advantage w h a t l i t t l e na ture h a d given h i m . T h e most efficient a g r i ­cul turis ts in Rajas than are the Jats w h o inhab i t such a t rac t ( the desert zone) tha t the i r sk i l l c o u l d ha rd ly ava i l against the w h i m s of the r a i n -god. A great po r t i on of l a n d is he ld by Rajputs w h o are the wors t agr icul tur is ts . I n the d iv i s ion o f U d a i p u r the Bhils w h o h o l d m u c h l a n d are no w h i t better t han the aristocratic Rajputs in this respect. T h e M a l i s , Gujars , Bishnois, Meos , etc., are good agricul tur is ts . B u t the i r , methods of c u l t i v a t i o n are t r a d i t i o n a l , implements ou t -moded a n d the general ag r i cu l t u r a l equip­ment poor. T h e livestock is very heal thy in western Rajas than w h i c h is more due to c l imate t h a n to the care and sk i l l of the people to raise i t . T h e defective system of marke t ­i n g of ag r i cu l t u r a l produce deprives the fanner of his legi t imate gains. T h e co-operative movement is s t i l l very backward a n d covers on ly 3.25 per r en t of the ent ire popu la ­t i o n o f Rajas than. T h e h o l d o f the M a h a j a n in r u r a l areas is u n ­disputed, t hough indebtedness varies, surpr is ingly enough, w i t h the f e r t i ­l i t y of the l a n d in most places. Subsidiary occupations and u r b a n arts a n d crafts are e i ther decaying or are very badly organised. T h e G r o w M o r e F o o d campa ign has no t been very successful.

T h e net result of this a g r i c u l t u r a l s tagnation is, as already stated, t h a t Rajas than is deficient in staple f ood -grains to the extent of 50,000 tons a year. T h e popu la t i on has been increasing by leaps a n d bounds since 1931 a n d was estimated at 1,52,97,979 souls at the 1951 Cen­sus. A pecul ia r i ty of the popu la ­t i o n g r o w t h of Rajas than is t ha t the rate has no t been u n i f o r m f r o m decade to decade. In 1881 the t o t a l p o p u l a t i o n o f R a j a s t a n , exclusive of the 1,66,343 Bhi ls only enumera ted by houses, was

1,01,02,049. Since then the p o p u ­l a t i on received a set-back in 1901 and again in 1921, w i t h the result t ha t in the pe r iod 1901-1941 the increase was on ly 7 per cent. As the Census Super in tendent of 1931 observed: ' ' T h e var ia t ions f r o m census to census resemble m i g h t y swings of Nature ' s p e n d u l u m . " W h i l e the great famine of 1899-1900, p o p u l a r l y k n o w n as " Chap -pan ia Kal ", affected the Census of 1901, an epidemic o f plague w h i c h broke ou t jus t before the Census of 1921 left its m a r k on the enumera­t i o n in the la t ter year. T h e net increase, however , since 1881 has s t i l l been 50 per cent. T h e den­sity works ou t at 117 persons per sq. m i l e w h i c h , as compared to most other parts of I n d i a , is very low. Rajasthan is, therefore, more of an under-developed than an over-popula ted State. Efforts should be directed, accordingly , to increas-i n g the ag r i cu l tu ra l and indus t r i a l wea l th of Rajas than, t hough any fur ther increase in the p o p u l a t i o n should be discouraged by a l l means.

I f ag r i cu l tu ra l l y Rajas than i s backward , indus t r i a l ly i t i s an i n fan t State, A l t h o u g h the salt indus t ry h a d developed on m o d e r n lines in the last quar te r of the 19th cen­t u r y , and the cement fac tory a t L a k h e r i started w o r k early in the 20 th century, the real i ndus t r i a l development of Rajas than m a y be said to have commenced on ly dur ­i n g and after the Second W o r l d W a r . Rajas than can n o w boast of a few organised industries, e.g., tex­tiles, sugar, cement, glass, m a t c h , minerals , o i l -mi l l s , small engineer­i n g , marb le a n d chemicals, etc., w h i c h can be greatly developed.

C o m p i l a t i o n o f indus t r i a l statis­tics by the D e p a r t m e n t concerned is s t i l l not complete , nevertheless a b r ie f review of the p r i n c i p a l indus­tries may be a t tempted . At p re ­sent we have 7 co t ton tex t i le m i l l s equ ipped w i t h about 70,000 spindles a n d 1,300 loorns. U n f o r t u n a t e l y o n l y 4 of t h e m have been ac tua l ly w o r k i n g for the last f ew years. In 1949-50 these mi l l s consumed 43,300 bales of co t ton a n d the i r a n n u a l p r o d u c t i o n d u r i n g the years 1947, 1948 a n d 1949 averaged about 15 m i l l i o n yards of c l o t h a n d 7 m i l ­l i o n yards o f ya rn . T h e p r o d u c t i o n was far less t h a n the requirements of the people.

T h e r e are t w o sugar mi l l s w h i c h produce m o r e t h a n 3,000 tons of

638

Page 2: Natural Resources of Rajasthan - epw.in€¦ · Natural Resources of Rajasthan BESIDES lack of irrigation, the other land problem in Rajas-than is that of uneconomic holdings Although

sugar annual ly Besides, there are abou t 15 khandsar i sugar fac tor ies w h i c h also con t r i bu te t he i r quo ta to the t o ta l sugar p r o d u c t i o n o f Ra jas­t h a n .

T h e most famous indus t r i a l establ ishment of Ra jas than is the Associated Cemen t Company 's fac­to ry at L a k h e r i w h i c h is one of the largest i n the who le o f I n d i a . T h e fac to ry was star ted in 1915 a n d is p r o d u c i n g 2,50,000 tons of cement per a n n u m .

T h e sod ium sulph ide fac tory a t J o d h p u r is also an ou ts tand ing indus t r ia l u n i t o f Ra jas than .

Besides these, there are t w o glass factor ies, 3 m a t c h factor ies, 26 o i l m i l l s , one large pa in t and varn ish w o r k , 3 bone c rush ing mi l ls , 2 che­m ica l factor ies, and a n u m b e r of smal l engineer ing workshops a n d marb le works.

In fac t the large indus t r i a l estab­l ishments of Ra jas than can be coun ted on f ingers , a n d even these suffer f r o m ei ther lack of suff icient power , inadequate f inance or short ­age of raw mater ia ls .

Ra jas than is also w e l l - k n o w n fo r its cottage industr ies and u rban arts a n d crafts. Hand loom weav ing is its m a j o r cot tage indust ry w i t h some 64,000 hand looms. Others are got a and kinare m a k i n g , jewe l cu t t i ng ,

w o o l sp inn ing a n d weav ing , dar i a n d niwar m a k i n g , cal ico p r i n t i n g , ename l l i ng on me ta l , marb le w o r k , i vo ry w o r k , paper m a k i n g , leather w o r k , brass utensi ls m a n u f a c t u r i n g , stone ca rv ing and po l ish ing , soap m a k i n g , wooden toys, rope m a k i n g , khus a n d rose scent m a k i n g , etc., etc. M o s t o f t h e m suffer f r o m i n ­adequate f inance and the conse­quen t t y ranny o f the m idd le m a n , ou t -moded techn ique, lack o f r a w mater ia ls a n d defect ive ma rke t i ng .

I t is ra ther strange tha t the home­l a n d of Bir las, Da lm ias , Singhanias, Seksarias, Doogars a n d Rampur i as has been famish ing indus t r ia l l y fo r the last so many years. Perhaps, Ra jas than i cap i ta l prefers commer­c ia l e m p l o y m e n t ; i t lacks indus t r i a l s tamina. S t i l l i t is never too late to mend . Ra jas than abounds in some of the raw mater ia ls requ i red for large-scale industr ies. I f ade­quate and cheap supply of power is avai lable and if more interest is pa i d by the industr ia l is ts a n d b ig businessmen of Ra jas than in this d i rec t ion , progress in indus t ry should not be d i f f i cu l t . Fo r example , there is a great scope fo r the develop­ment o f w o o l indust ry . Ra jas than has near ly one- f i f th of Ind ia 's sheep w h i c h yields one - th i rd o f Ind ia ' s to ta l woo l p roduc t i on . A b o u t 67

per cent of the woo l p roduced is expor ted outside I n d i a . We shou ld make i t a po in t to use a l l the w o o l we expor t a n d thus step up o u r w o o l indust ry .

Besides, there is enough scope fo r the establ ishment of new indus t r ia l uni ts in co t ton text i les, sugar, cement , leather, glass, power alco­h o l , and pot tery and porce la in . T h e vast salt b i t terns at Sambhar , D i d w a n a and Pachbhadra, w h i c h possess h igh chemica l values, s t i l l awa i t scientif ic analysis and system­at ic u t i l i sa t ion . T h e Depar tmen t o f Industr ies and Commerce , Rajas­t h a n , is seriously consider ing this p rob lem.

There is no t m u c h to ta lk about indus t r ia l labour . A lmos t al l the i m p o r t a n t labour legislations have been recently passed by the Gove rn ­ment . We have st i l l to awai t the i r w o r k i n g . T r a d e un ion ism is very weak. T h e s t rength o f labour w i l l g row w i t h the deve lopment o f indus t ry and general en l igh tenment .

T h e other sectors of Ra jas than economy are also under-developed. Bank ing , w h i c h is an index of the indus t r i a l and commerc ia l develop­men t of a coun t ry , is very poor ly represented by f o u r local scheduled banks w h i c h were started only a few years ago and tha t , too, w i t h

June 28, 1952

Page 3: Natural Resources of Rajasthan - epw.in€¦ · Natural Resources of Rajasthan BESIDES lack of irrigation, the other land problem in Rajas-than is that of uneconomic holdings Although

G o v e r n m e n t help . T h e Co-opera­t ive M o v e m e n t is s t i l l in its embryo­nic stage and the vast credit needs of the masses are met by the vi l lage and t o w n money-lenders and indigenous bankers. T h e State has come i n t o the picture on ly recently i n the p rog ramme o f G M F campaign .

In matters of" transport, a n d com­munica t ions , we have a ne t -work of rai lways w i t h a mileage of 3,157 spread th roughou t Rajasthan, bar­r i n g Jaisalmer and some parts of the southern h i l l y tracts. Bu t , on the other hand , we have only 9,314 miles of roads of all. types. T h i s works out at a figure of 6.5 miles of road per h u n d r e d sq. miles of area for a l l types of roads, a n d if we take only the meta l led roads, the figure w o u l d go d o w n as l ow as 2.5 miles per h u n d r e d sq. miles, whereas in the o ther States in I n d i a (except M a d h y a Bhara t where roads per h u n d r e d sq. miles are on ly 9.2 miles) have got 20 to 40 miles of roads per h u n d r e d sq. miles. Schemes have been prepared for cons t ruc t ing about 1,500 miles of roads, mostly meta l led , besides a large number of drainage works , bridges a n d approach roads.

Great expectations were enter­ta ined by the people of Rajasthan in regard to the p repara t ion and execution of the Five Year Plan, I t was earnestly hoped that the Plan w o u l d raise Rajas than to the level of the more advanced States of I n d i a . On a superficial v iew, the Plan for Rajasthan appears impressive. T h e t o t a l expend i tu re ' of Rs 1,521.25 lakhs is d i s t r ibu ted a m o n g various heads as fo l lows :

(in Rs lakhs) Agriculture and Rural Deve­

lopment . . . . . 167.22 Irrigation and Power . . 494-30 Industry 38-50 Transport . . . . 291.00 Social Services .. . 530.20

t h u s i t i s on ly a repl ica in m i n i a t u r e o f the A l l - I n d i a Plan . In the Five. Yea r Plan , however, the expendi ture per capi ta in the different const i tuent States differs greatly. For example, the expendi ­tu re per capi ta in each of the Par t A and Part B States is as fo l lows :

T h e table d e a r l y shows tha t wh i l e the per head expendi ture in the States of Saurashtra, Mysore , Bombay a n d Madra s w i l l be Rs 5 1 , 40 33 and 24 respectively, the expendi ture per head in Rajasthan, viz:., Rs 10 is the lowest of a l l the States. How can the eco­nomic reconstruct ion of Rajasthan be possible if development expendi­ture remains so meagre? It is t rue tha t most other States are more prosperous and tha t is w h y they can spend more in i m p l e m e n t i n g the i r economic p l an . F r o m this

v i ewpo in t Rajasthan. has to face cer ta in handicaps. T h i s makes the responsibili ty of the. Cen t r a l G o v ­ernment a l l the greater. I t ough t to have given greater f inancial he lp to the economical ly backward States of I n d i a . I t is strange that the representatives of the Rajasthan Government d i d not focus the a t t en t ion of the Cen t r a l Govern ­ment on this v i t a l po in t . No wonder that the people of Rajas­than have voiced a compla in t tha t they have been treated step­mothe r ly by the Cen t r a l Gove rn ­men t !

Even this small-scale p l a n does not seem to have any b r igh t fu ture in Rajasthan. F i rs t ly , there is no well-organised machinery for the execution of the P lan . Secondly, unless there is a favourable a tmo­sphere for the smooth func t ion ing of the governmenta l machinery , p lanned economic development w i l l have l i t t le chance.

660

THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY