14
National Value Engineering Award Pre-Construction Engineering less than $25 million Most Value Added Proposal Presented by the AASHTO Value Engineering Technical Committee August 4, 2015 Montana Department of Transportation Flathead River 3 Miles North West of Big Fork For Demonstrating Outstanding Value Engineering Achievements in Teamwork, Cost Savings, Enhanced Performance, or Expedited Project Delivery that Resulted in an Overall Improved Business Practice

National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

National Value Engineering Award

Pre-Construction

Engineering

less than $25 million

Most

Value Added

Proposal

Presented by the AASHTO Value Engineering Technical Committee

August 4, 2015

Montana Department of Transportation

Flathead River – 3 Miles North West of Big Fork

For Demonstrating Outstanding Value Engineering Achievements

in Teamwork, Cost Savings, Enhanced Performance, or Expedited Project Delivery

that Resulted in an Overall Improved Business Practice

Page 2: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

FLATHEAD RIVER BRIDGE 3 MILES NW BIGFORK

2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE

PRESENTATION

PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (<$25M)

Page 3: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

OVERVIEW • LOCATION:

– Northwestern Montana near the towns of Big Fork and Somers

• Located over the Flathead River

• Transition between flat terrain and rolling hills

• PURPOSE AND NEED:

– Improve safety and mobility by replacing the functionally obsolete structure and the bridge approaches

– The structure ranked high for seismic retrofit because of its fracture critical two-girder system

Page 4: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (
Page 5: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

OVERVIEW - continued

• PROPOSED SCOPE:

– New alignment

– Construct new 736 foot, 3 span bridge

– Complex 1.4 mile reconstruction project

• ORIGINAL PROJECT COST = $24.3M

Page 6: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

OVERVIEW - continued

• CONSTRAINTS: – 4(f) Fish Wildlife and Parks – fishing access site

– Environmental issues (wetlands, bull trout, etc.)

– High risk Right of Way acquisition

• CONSIDERATIONS: – New offset alignment

– Liquefaction may occur during a high seismic event at the end bents

– Deep Water Foundation constructability

– Flathead County Master Trail Plan

Page 7: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

VE/VA STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS

• 1A - New Alignment or Existing - Evaluate Bridge Foundation Types

• 1B - New Alignment – Evaluate Ground Improvements Beneath Approach Embankments

• 2A - Existing Alignment – With Detour Bridge During Construction

• 2B - Existing Alignment – With Road Closure During Construction

• 3A - Either Alignment – Eliminate Shared Use Path • 3B - Either Alignment – Design For Future Expansion

For Shared Use Path

Page 8: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

RECOMMENDATION #1A – New Alignment -

Evaluate Bridge Foundation Types

Other Options

• 3-72” Diameter Piles

• 2 Rows of 5-48” Diameter Piles for additional stiffness

• 2-96” Diameter Piles for accelerated construction

• Must meet “no rise” requirement

Page 9: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

RIVER BOTTOM CROSS-SECTION

Page 10: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

Recommendation #1B – New Alignment – Evaluate Ground Improvements Beneath Approach

Embankments

Improve Soil Properties Using Compaction Grouting Original Design: Stone columns used to mitigate potential for liquefaction and lateral spreading at both abutments. Proposed Change: Improve the soil properties at both abutments using compaction grouting. Justification: Compaction grouting improves soil density and increases soil strength. Anticipated reduced mobilization cost and less equipment, can limit treatment to target zone in soil profile, can stage grout pattern/ hole layout as needed. Decreased construction time. POTENTIAL COST SAVINGS = $0.7M

Page 11: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

Recommendation #3B – Either Alignment – Design For Future Expansion For Shared Use Path

• Build bridge foundation and superstructure to accommodate future Shared Use Path

• Construct Path when trail connection is constructed

• Potential Cost Savings = $0.91 M • Current design does not include a path along the length of the

project

Page 12: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

The Study Team applied the principals and practices of the Value Engineering Job Plan which resulted in cost reduction and performance benefits in the following areas:

• Cost & schedule savings as compared to original design

• Project improvements as compared to original design

• Improved constructability

Total potential cost savings of $9.73 million, a 40% reduction in the total project cost

Page 13: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (

SUMMARY • 30-35% reduction in the construction schedule is

anticipated • Innovative techniques to solving complex geotechnical

design • Maintained safety and traffic operations • Reduced Environmental, R/W and Fishing Access site

impacts • Reduced work zone impacts to users • Improved constructability of the bridge • 2 value added ideas:

– Add lighting or conduit to shared use path along the structure

– Extend the separated path along the length of the project to include the fishing access

Page 14: National Value Engineering Awardsp.design.transportation.org/Documents/TC Value... · 2015 AASHTO VE CONFERENCE PRESENTATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (