National Capital Planning Commission Project Narrative

Page 1 of 4

National Capital Planning Commission Project Narrative P110 Replace Condemned Coatings Laboratory,

NSWC Carderock, Bethesda, Maryland February 1, 2012

The sponsoring agency for this project is the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Washington District, NWSC Carderock (Carderock) acting for the project proponent. P.O.C.’s for these organizations are as follows:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Washington District 1314 Harwood St. SE Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5018 Katherine Klepper: 202-685-8437, NAVFAC Liaison to NCPC This Project Report has been prepared for the P110 Replace Condemned Coatings Laboratory project at NSWC Carderock, Bethesda, Maryland. This report has been prepared for submission to the National Capital Planning Commission for their review and approval.

Page 2 of 4

Project Description: The proposed project will construct a 6,000 SF pre-engineering structure which will replace Building 125, an abandoned Quonset hut. It will be constructed in an area currently occupied by several other Quonset hut type structures and another pre-engineered building (Building 129) that was recently completed. P-110 will be a one-story facility with an overhead door, passage door and two secure windows. It will be clad in an off-white metal panel and will have a blue accent on the canopies covering doors. This is in conformance with the Base Appearance Plan. One wall, the south wall, will be covered with a solar wall (labeled “Trombe wall”). This is a solar air heating system composed of a sandwich of a perforated exterior skin which allows air to pass through it, an air space and an interior metal panel. Air is heated, rises, and is captured to preheat incoming air in the cold months. The heated air is vented during the summer months keeping the south wall cool. The solar wall is attached to the exterior wall. The total dimensions of the proposed building are approximately 80 feet in length by 75 feet in width that will house an interior crane. Site features provided for the project include a site access road, site and building lighting, and ADA compliant pedestrian sidewalks. Two new parking spaces will be constructed to provide ADA accessible parking near the new building. Total Area of Building Site and Allocation of Land to Proposed Uses: The proposed project will construct a 6,000 SF pre-engineering structure. The total dimensions of the proposed building are approximately 80 feet in length by 75 feet in width that will house an interior crane. The replacement Coatings Lab will be constructed on an adjacent open site about 120 feet southwest, currently covered by brush. Stands of mature trees in the new site vicinity will not be impacted by construction. Existing Assigned Employment and Projected Assigned Employment over a 20-Year Period, in 5-Year Increments: No new employees will be added as a result of this project. Description of the Relationship of the Project to the Agency’s Master Plan, Where Applicable, Including Rationale for any Deviations: This project is included as part of the draft Carderock Master Plan. Carderock is the Navy's center of excellence for ships and ship systems. Carderock specializes in Ship Design & Integration; Environmental Quality Systems; Hull Forms & Propulsors; Structures and Materials; Signatures, Silencing Systems, and Susceptibility; Machinery Systems; and Vulnerability and Survivability Systems. The location of the new laboratory will be in an un-utilized portion of the installation, directly east of Building 125. The former coatings lab will be demolished.

Page 3 of 4

Status of Coordination with Affected Local and State Governments: Carderock has consulted with the National Park Service, C&O Canal National Historic Park as well as the George Washington Memorial Parkway Headquarters in reference to this project.

Status of Community Participation, including Summary of Community Views: No coordination was needed for this project as it only affects Carderock.

Schedule for Construction and Occupancy: Installation will begin after government approvals are received. Executive Order 13514 and EISA, Section 438: Sustainable design will be integrated into the design development and construction in accordance with Executive Order 13514, as required by all Navy Projects. Additionally, this project will comply with Executive Order 12123 (Greening the Government Through Efficient Energy management), the Energy Policy Act, and the Silver Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) criteria. Compliance with the Energy Policy Act 2005 will be integrated into design and construction through the use of items such as increased “R” values of wall and roof, and specified energy-star HVAC equipment.

Total Estimated Cost of Project and Funding Status: The P110 Coatings Lab is expected to cost approximately $4,000,000 and is fully funded. Transportation Management Program: This project does not increase employment at Carderock; therefore, a Transportation Management Plan is not applicable. Environmental Documentation: This action qualifies for a categorical exclusion (CATEX) under the National Environmental Policy Act, Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 1500-1508), and OPNAVIST 5090.1C. A copy of the CATEX is included as Appendix A. Historic Preservation Documentation: Concurrence from the Maryland State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was received in January 2013. A copy of the Concurrence is included as Appendix B. .

In accordance with the normal requirements of the DoD and the MDE Stormwater Management Guidelines for State and Federal Projects, any new development is required to provide both quality (treatment) and quantity (detention) controls for the areas disturbed by the development. The design of these controls should be in accordance with the 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual (with the 2009 Updates for Environmental Site Design) and the UFC-3-210-10: Low Impact Development.

Low Impact Design methods will be used to meet the UFC 3-210-10 and MDE requirements to capture and treat all runoff from the design rainfall event. The MDE methods actually exceed the UFC requirements, and work to effectively reduce post-development land conditions to pre-development levels through the use of small quality and quantity control measures. Results of geotechnical testing show that site soils have no capacity for infiltration. Therefore, micro-biofiltration measures, with subdrainage systems, will be provided to meet L.I.D. design goals. Runoff from the new building roof and surrounding walks and driveway will be directed to the stormwater management measures. The micro biofiltration basins are designed to overflow to grade across gravel overflow weirs, to slow and spread discharge to non-erosive velocity. The required subdrainage systems will be discharged onto grade below the project site, at a gravel-surfaced outlet, also designed to slow and spread the trickle discharge."

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Page 1 of 1RSIMS 3 - Map

12/6/2012https://rsims.navfac.navy.mil/RSIMS_Viewer/PrintOutput.aspx?MAP=MapFramework526...

wendy.markos

Callout

General Location of P110 Building

wendy.markos

Text Box

2

wendy.markos

Text Box

Enclosure (1)

Project Number: P110Project Title: Replace Condemned Coatings Laboratory

FY:2010

Date: 12-AUG-10

UIC: N61150

Location: BETHESDA, MARYLAND

Prepared By:

Cover Sheet/Team List for:

NSA NORTH POTOMAC

Completed: Working: XA. Team Check List:

B. Team Meeting:

On-Site:

Date:

VTC: Conference Call:

Name Position Command Phone NumberC. Team Members:

RIchard Klein Activity CO (Meets Military Requirements) 12-AUG-10Signature Position DateF. Endorsements:

Please note the following security regulations that

apply to the technical information and data

contained in this 1391:

Distribution Statement D: Distribution authorized

to DOD and DOD Contractors Only; critical technology

(11 June 2010). Other requests shall be referred to

PEO/IWS5A or higher authority. No distribution of

this report shall be made to DTIC.

Warning - This document contains technical data

whose export is restricted by the Arms Export

Control Act (Title 22, U.S.C., Sec. 2751, et. Seq.)

or Executive Order 12470. Violations of these export

laws are subject to severe criminal penalties.

Disseminate per the provisions of OPNAVINST

5510.161.

Destruction Notice - For classified documents,

follow the procedures in DOD 5220.22-M, Industrial

Security Manual, Section II-19, or OPNAVINST

5510.1H, Chapter 17. For unclassified, limited

distribution documents, destroy by any method that

will prevent disclosure of contents or

reconstruction of the document. DOD and DOD

Contractors Only.

MILCON CHECKLIST

Economic Analysis

Site Plan

Facility Planning Document(s)/P-80

Calculations

R19 (Bachelor Housing Survey)

Notice of Violation (NOV)

Other

PHOTOGRAPHS

P-110 Floor Plan

P-110 Basic Facility Requirement

(BFR)

P-110 Cost Estimate

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

E. Required Attachments:D. Remarks:

Comments: None

4420

Project Cost ($000)

3. Installation(SA) and Location/UIC:

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. Date

4. Project Title

5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project Number

1. Component

Page No. 1DDForm

1 Dec 761391

8. Project Cost ($000)

12 AUG 2010

4,42032010

Replace Condemned Coatings Laboratory

NAVY2010FY

N61150(CR)NSA NORTH POTOMAC

BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)

Level: INSTL/PWD_FINAL Draft: Initial Draft 15-FEB-11

Project Details ID: 74326

COATINGS LABORATORY 4,560.03 552.76

m2

552.76

m2

1.0000 4,560.03

Cat

Code

OSD

Guid.

Guid.

Cost

Guid.

Size

Project

Scope

Size

Fctr

Area

Cost

Fctr Unit Cost

Guidance Unit Cost Analysis

9. COST ESTIMATES

Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Cost($000)

REPLACE CONDEMNED COATINGS LABORATORY (5,950

SF)

COATINGS LABORATORY (5,950 SF)

ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION (INSIDE)

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT

SPECIAL COSTS

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE SUPP INFO (OMSI)

LEED AND EPACT 2005 COMPLIANCE (INSIDE)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES

SITE PREPARATIONS

PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS

ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION

ELECTRICAL UTILITIES

MECHANICAL UTILITIES

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION

DEMOLITION

LEED AND EPA ACT 2005 COMPLIANCE

SUBTOTAL

CONTINGENCY (5%)

TOTAL CONTRACT COST

SIOH (5.7%)

SUBTOTAL

DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST (4%)

TOTAL REQUEST ROUNDED

TOTAL REQUEST

EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS (NON ADD)

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

552.76

552.76 4,560.03

2,770

(2,520)

(30)

(60)

(40)

(40)

(80)

1,080

(130)

(130)

(240)

(100)

(110)

(150)

(100)

(120)

3,850

190

4,040

230

4,270

150

4,420

4,420

(115)

Cost Estimate was developed by an Architect/Engineer consultant, Samaha Associates, through

a concept study completed in September 2008. Since the estimate was developed for a

specific facility in the West Bethesda, MD area, both the size factor and area cost factor

have been kept at 1.0. Sahama Associates used the "SUCCESS" program to develop project

cost. The cost estimate developed by Samaha escalated/de-escalated costs from 2008 to 2010.

1.000 1.000000000

Esc. Factor

Room

Size

Fctr

32010

Facility



4. Project Title


1. Component

Page No. 2DDForm

1 Dec 761391C


12 AUG 2010

4,42032010


NAVY2010FY


BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)



Constructs a pre-engineered building with concrete slab on grade and insulated metal roof,

high bay area, overhead roll-up door, HVAC system with dust control, plumbing, fire

protection systems, and information systems. Built-in equipment includes 5-ton bridge

crane rails and lockers. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features will be incorporated as

per Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 4-010-01, Department of Defense Minimum Anti-

Terrorism Standards for Buildings.

Sustainable design will be integrated into the design development and construction in

accordance with Executive Order 13123 (Greening the Government Through Efficient Energy

management), the Energy Policy Act 2005, and the Silver Leadership in Energy and

Environmental Design (LEED) criteria. Compliance with the Energy Policy Act 2005 will be

integrated into design and construction through use of items such as increased "R" values

of wall and roof, and specified energy-star HVAC equipment.

Supporting Facilities include electrical and mechanical utilities, exterior lighting, site

utility connections (water, telephone, electrical, gas, sanitary and storm sewers, local

area network), and demolition of building 125 (#200116, 390.18 m2/4,200 SF). Paving and

Site Improvements include vehicle parking area and roadways, driveway/connector to Atlanta

Rd., semi-trailer truck turn-around area, sidewalks, landscaping, and grading. Site

Preparations include earthwork removal and site clearing. Environmental mitigation

includes removal and disposal of hazardous materials from building 125 prior to

demolition. Supporting Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection features include electronic lift-

gate access and bollards and planters.

10. Description of Proposed Construction:

FACILITY PLANNING DATA: Category Code Requirement UM Adequate Substandard Inadequate

Deficit/

Surplus32010 553 m2 0 0 390 -163UNDERWATER EQUIPMENT

LABORATORY

The project scope was developed using the industrial engineering and architectural methods

to evaluate optimum layout based on work flow, equipment sizing, and circulation/access

space required for workers to perform mission functions. Detailed space surveys of

existing facilities were completed for category code 320-10, Underwater Equipment

Laboratory. Space criteria found in Carderock instruction 5910.1 (Space Allocation

Process) and NAVFAC P-80 were used where applicable.

A concept study completed by Samaha Associates (architectural and engineering) and Bopaya

NOTES:

SCOPE:

11. Requirement: 553 m2 0 m2 0 m2Adequate: Substandard:



4. Project Title


1. Component

Page No. 3DDForm

1 Dec 761391C


12 AUG 2010

4,42032010


NAVY2010FY


BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)



An adequately sized and configured Coatings Laboratory facility is required to restore

research, development, fabrication, test and evaluation capabilities which have been lost

due to building 125 being condemned after incurring significant structural damage during

heavy snows this past winter. Loss of this facility has resulted in a capability gap that

severely impacts Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division's (NSWCCD) Acoustic

Signature Technology Mission to perform research, development, design, testing,

acquisition support, fleet guidance and in-service engineering to mitigate acoustic

signatures on ships and ship systems for all current and future Navy ships.

When full functional, the Coatings Laboratory supported this mission through:

- Studies based on the physics of acoustic and physical phenomena to determine the

characteristics of signature control material and development of measurement technologies

for the characterization of acoustic and vibration control properties.

- Investigations of the effectiveness of decoupling, anechoic, and damping materials as

applied to a particular design through analytic and scale modeling, as well as full-scale

implementations.

- The development of required signature control materials.

- The development of application techniques, equipment, and installation technologies for

acoustic signature control materials and completion of performance effectiveness tests of

those materials.

- Evaluation of designs by supporting fabrication efforts relating to both Advanced

Development Models (ADM) and Engineering Development Models (EDM) to support transition of

technologies to the fleet.

- Supporting the development of procurement specifications and qualification of system

components for fleet acquisition programs and in-service engineering.

REQUIREMENT:

Bidanda & Associatiates (industrial engineering) in September 2008 was used to validate

basic facility requirements (BFR) and develop preliminary floor layouts.

PROJECT:

(Current Mission)

This project constructs a new Coatings Laboratory to accommodate research, development,

test and evaluation (RDT&E) and fleet support for acoustic signature technology. The

proposed facility repaces the existing Coatings Laboratory that suffered severe structural

damage from heavy snowfalls in the National Capital Region from DEC 2009 - FEB 2010.



4. Project Title


1. Component

Page No. 4DDForm

1 Dec 761391C


12 AUG 2010

4,42032010


NAVY2010FY


BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)



Loss of these mission capabilities impacts current and future Navy ship programs,

including Virginia Class, Ohio Replacement, and Advanced Submarine Combat Systems. Near-

term and long-term workload generated by these programs will either be significantly

delayed or unable to be completed by the Navy, impacting delivery schedules and other

critical program milestones.

The capabilities provided by the Coatings Laboratory will be required to support design

and ship construction of the VIRGINIA Class Block IV procurement. This lab must be

available in FY-12 to support VIRGINIA Class Block IV design studies which are scheduled

to run from FY-12 to FY-14. Prototype hull treatment configurations will be required to

be fabricated in the facility in FY-13 to support associated large scale model testing for

Block IV during FY-14 to FY-15. The Coatings Laboratory will also be required to support

future Virginia Class Block procurements beyond FY-14.

The Coatings Laboratory will also play a critical role in Ohio Replacement Technology

Development initiated in FY-10 to provide insertion of technologies at the TRL-6

(Technology Readiness Level) by FY-14. NSWCCD has been assigned the lead for concept and

system development of signature materials associated with the platform from FY-10 to FY-

13, workload that cannot be successfully performed without a functional Coatings

Laboratory. The Coatings Laboratory will also be needed to support testing necessary for

the development of preliminary specifications by FY13 and final system specifications

required by FY15. The system components fabricated and tested in the Coatings Laboratory

will be required to support component validation tests, mockup validation, and full-scale

patch fabrication and installation efforts planned for FY14 - FY15. Similar mission

workload in support of the Ohio Replacement Program is anticipated to continue through at

least FY-24.

NSWCCD has been tasked by PEO IWS (Integrated Warfare Systems) to be the lead on the Flank

Array Design IPT (Inegrated Product Team) in support of the Advanced Submarine Combat

Systems development program. An operational Coatings Laboratory will be required between

FY-11 to FY-15 to support development of scalable conformal array concepts for current and

future Navy Platforms. NSWCCD will be responsible for the fabrication of prototype

component test pieces in the Coatings Laboratory and will support the fabrication of a

full-scale test article for application on a current Navy platform (possibly SSGN). Also

under the Advanced Submarine Combat Systems development program NSWCCD is responsible to

support technology development efforts associated with the development of a bow conformal

array from FY-11 to FY-15 for future submarine platforms. An operational Coatings

Laboratory is required to support the fabrication of prototypes for scale model testing

and system development. Similar mission workload in support of dvanced Submarine Combat

Systems development is anticipated to continue through at least FY-22.

NSWCCD is funded at over $5,000K annually to support these missions. Program Office

sponsors for these efforts include PMS 450 (VIRGINIA Class Program Office), PMS 397 (OHIO



4. Project Title


1. Component

Page No. 5DDForm

1 Dec 761391C


12 AUG 2010

4,42032010


NAVY2010FY


BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)



Until recently Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division (NSWCCD) performed Coatings

Laboratory operations in support of its acoustic signature technology mission in building

125, located at NSWCCD's West Bethesda, MD base. The lab was specially configured and

equipped to support the processing of polymer materials utilizing both batch processing

and modular polymer processor technologies, which required strict environmental controls.

Samples prepared at the lab ranged from small samples to support qualification testing to

large prototypes utilized as Engineering Development Models (EDM) and Advanced Development

Models (ADM) on full-scale platforms.

Building 125 is a 390.19 m2/4,200 SF quonset hut constructed as a temporary structure

adjacent to the base fence line in 1946. Several conex containers augment the facility by

providing an additional 92.9 m2/1,000 SF of heated and non-heated space required to store

chemicals, molds, tanks, and other supplies used during Coatings Laboratory operations.

During the winter of 2009/10 the West Bethesda, MD area experienced record breaking

snowfalls. The heavy wet snows and winds associated with these storms caused a near-by

quonset hut, building 127, to collapse, and also caused visible damage to building 125's

structural system. Concerned that building 125 was also in danger of collapsing, NSWCCD

Replacement Program Office), PEO IWS (Integrated Warfare Systems), ONR (Office of Naval

Research), SEA 073R (Advanced Submarine Systems Development), and also several Work for

Private Parties with Industry.

Mission Dependency Index (MDI) rating for Building 125 is SIGNIFICANT (70) due to the

critical role this facility plays in supporting NSWCCD core mission. The proposed

replacement facility will also have an MDI rating of 70.

The Coatings Laboratory must comply with the latest Department of Defense anti-

terrorism/force protection minimum construction standards. In accordance with CNIC and

NAVFAC construction guidance, sustainable design features must be integrated into the

project by meeting the U.S. Green Building Council's Silver LEED (Leadership in Energy and

Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System standard and adhering to Energy Policy

Act 2005 criteria.

Siting for the proposed MILCON must adhere to anti-terrorism/force protection stand-offs

from the controlled perimeter/fence line, and existing roadways, parking, and facilities.

Additional siting considerations at NSWCCD's West Bethesda base that must be accounted for

include explosive safety quantity distance (ESQD) arcs, wetlands, and tree planting areas.

Facility siting should also take into consideration direction in the base master plan to

consolidate industrial facilities within an industrial complex in the vicinity of existing

Building 9.

CURRENT SITUATION:



4. Project Title


1. Component

Page No. 6DDForm

1 Dec 761391C


12 AUG 2010

4,42032010


NAVY2010FY


BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)



brought in Woods Peacock Engineering Consultants in February 2010 to evaluate the damage

to the facility's infrastructure and determine whether it could still safely support

Coatings Lab operations. Woods Peacock observed severe structural damage including

lateral displacement of facility walls, cracking of drywall, displacement of walls at the

building's base, and twisting of exposed arches. Woods Peacock determined that building

125 had suffered similar damage to its infrastructure as building 127, and was at great

risk of a similar catastrophic collapse. Woods Peacock deemed the facility unfit for

occupation. In March 2010 NSWCCD sought a second opinion from Faisant Associates, who

concurred with Woods Peacock's determination that the building was unsafe and should be

considered condemned.

The configuration and siting of the Coatings Laboratory/Building 125 hindered operational

efficiency and security of the personnel, equipment, and work performed within the

facility. The 64 year old quonset hut was originally built as a temporary facility and

was not functionally designed to support the industrial operations and RDT&E mission it

has accommodated in recent years. At 390.19 m2/4,200 SF, building 125 provides

significantly less space than the Coatings Lab's validated BFR requirement of 557.4

m2/6,000 SF. This has been somewhat mitigated by the use of conex containers to provide

an additional 92.9 m2/1,000 SF of heated and unheated space used to store chemicals,

equipment, and other supplies required during Coatings Lab operations.

Building 125 was constructed in 1946, prior to the implementation of current anti-

terrorism/force protection (AT/FP), security, and environmental regulations. The Coatings

Lab is classified as an INHABITED FACILITY and as such should be sited a minimum of 79'

from the controlled perimeter/fence line and 33' from parking and roadways. Building 125

is currently sited adjacent to the fence line and does not meet AT/FP security criteria.

The extensive damage suffered by building 125 has left the 64 year old temporary facility

beyond repair and no longer physically capable of supporting the Coatings Lab mission. In

order to minimize the impact on major Navy initiatives such as the Ohio Replacement,

Virginia Class Submarine, and Advanced Combat Systems Development programs, NSWCCD

requires a permanent facility solution as soon as possible to replace the Acoustic

Signature Technology RDT&E capabilities lost with building 125. NSWCCD has worked with

NAVFAC WASHINGTON (NFW) to explore potential replacement solutions using existing or

leased facilities, but nothing suitable has been located at or near NSWCCD's West Bethesda

site that meets necessary security, anti-terrorism/force protection (AT/FP),

environmental, and high bay requirements. Additionally, use of off-site leased facilities

presents undesirable logistic and economic impacts since the employees who use the

Coatings Laboratory have offices located at NSWCCD's West Bethesda base and must be

available to perform other work duties at this site.

The only viable permanent solution to replace the condemned Coatings Laboratory is new

construction. Since the damage to building 125 was created by natural causes, funding of



4. Project Title


1. Component

Page No. 7DDForm

1 Dec 761391C


12 AUG 2010

4,42032010


NAVY2010FY


BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)



the proposed replacement facility qualifies under the Major Restoration or Replacement of

Damaged Facilities Project Authority, as described in section 4.4.3 of the Navy's Facility

Project Instruction (OPNAVINST 11010.20G) and authorized under 10 U.S.C. Section 2854.

FY-10 funding under this authority would provide the most expeditious path to replacing

building 125, minimizing the impact to the major Navy program milestones supported by

NSWCCD's acoustic signature technology mission. Additional benefits to new construction

would be a properly sized facility that meets validated BFR requirements, eliminating the

need for unsightly conex containers and providing a functional laboratory layout that will

improve efficiency and safety of industrial operations performed within the facility. New

construction would also allow the coatings lab to be sited in a more secure location that

meets current AT/FP criteria. A final benefit would be the opportunity to site the new

facility near building 9, NSWCCD's major industrial facility. The base master plan calls

for consolidation of industrial operations near each other, allowing shared use of labor

and equipment and the potential to reduce industrial costs.

Planned mission workload that was to be completed by Naval Surface Warfare Center

Carderock Division (NSWCCD) utilizing the capabilities provided by the Coatings Laboratory

will be significantly delayed or not completed at all, severely impacting the Navy's

ability to perform Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) of current acoustic

signature mitigation technologies and provide acquisition and in-service engineering

support.

Failure to complete this work in support of program office sponsors will result in the

delay of critical milestones associated with current and future submarine and warfare

system design programs as well as limit NSWCCD's ability to provide timely in-service

engineering support to the fleet.

The Navy will incur a significantly higher risk to current submarine design and

construction programs, including Virginia Class Block IV, Ohio Replacement, and Advanced

Submarine Combat Systems. The lack of adequate facilities will impact schedules related

to technology development and will delay system design and specification development.

These delays will add cost to platform procurement. A non-operational coatings lab will

limit the ability of the Navy to timely assess the changes to ship systems that inherently

occur during the lifespan of a ship, impacting platform maintenance schedules and

availabilities.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:

ADDITIONAL: Economic Alternatives Considered:

The existing Coatings Laboratory is located in building 125, which was severely damaged by

heavy snowfalls from DEC 2009 - FEB 2010. Two separate engineering consultants surveyed

the structural damage and declared the facility unfit for occupancy. This is not a viable

solution.

A. Status Quo:



4. Project Title


1. Component

Page No. 8DDForm

1 Dec 761391C


12 AUG 2010

4,42032010


NAVY2010FY


BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)



Per NAVFAC Washington, leased space is not available within close vicinity to NSWCCD's

West Bethesda site that meets necessary anti-terrorism/force protection, security,

environmental, high-bay, and other requirements necessary to support Coatings Laboratory

operations. Additionally, use of off-site leased facilities presents undesirable logistic

and economic impacts since the employees who use the Coatings Laboratory have offices

located at NSWCCD's West Bethesda base and must be available to perform other work duties

at this site. Although not really viable, the net present value of the Off-Site Lease

option is $30,426,936 over a 32 year period of analysis beginning in FY-11.

C. Lease:

The only viable permanent solution to replace the condemned Coatings Laboratory is new

F. Analysis Results:

A new 557.4 m2/6,000 SF Coatings Laboratory Facility could be constructed for

approximately $5M at NSWCCD's West Bethesda base. The proposed sizing would meet current

validated BFR requirements and eliminate need for conex containers currently used to

provide 92.9 m2/1,000 SF of heated and unheated storage. Siting that meets anti-

terrorism/force protection, explosive safety quantity distance, and environmental criteria

is available near existing building 9. An additional benefit to this site would be

consolidation of industrial operations near each other, consistent with the base master

plan, leading to shared use of resources and reduced costs. The New Construction

alternative has a net present value of $5,170,789 over a 32 year period of analysis

beginning in FY-11. Payback period is 4.6 yrs, Savings to Investment Ratio (SIR) = 4.5,

and Return On Investment (ROI) = 350%.

New construction is the best economic solution for the Navy, and also the only truly

viable alternative to meet mission requirements. Therefore New Construction is the

preferred solution.

D. New Construction:

Building 125 is a 64 year old quonset hut constructed as a temporary facility in 1946.

The building's structural system has been severely damaged and cannot be feasibly

repaired. There are no other facilities available on site that could realistically be

renovated/modernized to provide long-term high bay, anti-terrorism/force protection,

security, environmental, and other criteria required to accommodate Coatings Laboratory

operations. Although not really viable, the net present value of Renovation/Modernization

is $20,040,208 over a 32 year period of analysis beginning in FY-11.

B. Renovation/Modernization:

N/A

E. Other Alternatives:



4. Project Title


1. Component

Page No. 9DDForm

1 Dec 761391C


12 AUG 2010

4,42032010


NAVY2010FY


BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)



construction, at a cost of $4.42M. Since the damage to building 125 was created by

natural causes, funding of the proposed replacment facility qualifies under the Major

Restoration or Replacement of Damaged Facilities Project Authority, as described in

section 4.4.3 of the Navy's Facility Project Instruction (OPNAVINST 11010.20G) and

authorized under 10 U.S.C. Section 2854. Use of this construction authority provides the

opportunity to fund via FY-10 appropriation. Funding in FY-10 would be the most

expeditious path to replacing building 125, minimizing the impact to the major Navy

program milestones supported by NSWCCD's acoustic signature technology mission.

Issues (If yes, please provide discussion under issue):

Yes No

DDESB, AICUZ, Airfield, EMR, or wetlands

Endangered species/sensitive habitat

Air quality

Cultural/archeological resources

Clearing of trees

Known contamination at selected site

Operational problems

Traffic patterns impact

Existing utilities upgrade

Ordnance sweep required prior to Construction

Required

Approval Date:

Expected Date:

Not Required

Level of NEPA:

NEPA Documentation:

Host Nation Approval:

Planning (If no, please provide an explanation):

12. Supplemental Data:

Yes, obtained date:X 09/2010No, expected date:

Site Approval:

N/A

National Capital Region Approval:

Working with installation/region to obtain site approval.

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Yes No

X

Consistent w/ Master Plan or Base/Regional Dev.

Yes No

X Complete

Yes No



4. Project Title


1. Component

Page No. 10DDForm

1 Dec 761391C


12 AUG 2010

4,42032010


NAVY2010FY


BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)



Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

5 -Ton Crane Rail

Workbenches

m

EA

11.15

8.00

2,270.00

3,200.00

25,311

25,600

BUILT-IN EQUIPMENT LS 57,443

BUDGET ESTIMATE SUMMARY SHEET:

Mitigation Issues:

Project Issues:

Shielding

SCIF

Fencing

IDS

Other Type:

X

X

X

X

Categorical Exclusion

Environmental Assessment(EA)

Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)

Memorandum of Negative Decision

Yes No

X

X

X

X

Wetlands replacement/enhancement

Hazardous waste

Contaminated soil/water

Other

Environmental Cleanup: N/A

Yes No

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

System safety

Soils - foundation and seismic conditions

Construction/operational permits

Local air quality/wastewater permits

Complies with Final Governing Standard (Environmental standard for Spain, Italy &

Greece)

Land Acquisition (i.e. location, quantity)

Technical Operating Manuals

Feasibility/Constructibility in FY

Historical Preservation

Does the facility have an overhead crane requirement?

Navy Crane Center contacted to assist with dev. of crane estimate (lifting

capacity < 10-tons)?

Navy Crane Center contacted to coord. procurement and timelines (lifting capacity

>= 10-tons)?

Yes No

X Physical Security:



4. Project Title


1. Component

Page No. 11DDForm

1 Dec 761391C


12 AUG 2010

4,42032010


NAVY2010FY


BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)



A. Estimated Design Data:

1. Status:

Special Construction Features:

Utilities and Site Improvements:

SITE PREPARATIONS

Site Earthwork

Site Clearing

PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS

Roadways

Walks, Steps, Ramps, & Terraces

Landscaping

Site Development

ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION

Security Gate Assembly

Security Gate Control Systems

Bollards and Planters

ELECTRICAL UTILITIES

Exterior Lighting

Site Communications Distribution

Site Electrical Distribution

MECHANICAL UTILITIES

Water Supply & Distribution System

Sanitary Sewer Systems

Storm Sewer Systems

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION

HAZMAT Removal Bldg. 125

DEMOLITION

Demolition Bldg. 125 (#200116)

LEED AND EPA ACT 2005 COMPLIANCE

Low Impact Development (LID)

LS

m3

AC

LS

m2

m2

m2

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

LS

m

m

m

LS

m2

LS

m2

LS

EA

638.4

.7

221.57

119.57

232.25

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

149.35

97.54

73.15

390.18

390.18

.032

190.90

15,507.30

84.77

57.37

95.04

85,398.00

178,047.00

36,378.00

30,000.00

22,747.00

22,218.00

52,956.00

204.04

439.28

483.92

373.14

260.71

3,688,000.00

132,726

121,871

10,855

133,113

18,782

6,860

22,073

85,398

244,425

178,047

36,378

30,000

97,921

22,747

22,218

52,956

108,719

30,473

42,847

35,399

145,592

145,592

101,724

101,724

118,016

118,016

ANTI-TERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION (Inside)

SPECIAL COSTS

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE SUPP INFO (OMSI)

LEED AND EPACT 2005 COMPLIANCE (Inside)

LS

LS

LS

LS

26,540

37,628

40,209

76,000

AT/FP

PCAS

OMSI

LEED AND EPACT 2005 COMPLIANCE

EA

EA

EA

LS

.01

.01

.015

1

2,654,045.08

3,762,821.55

2,680,585.53

76,000.00

26,540

37,628

40,209

76,000

Item UM Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

Lockers EA 10.00 653.24 6,532

(A) Date design or Parametric Cost Estimate started

(B) Date 35% Design or Parametric Cost Estimate complete



4. Project Title


1. Component

Page No. 12DDForm

1 Dec 761391C


12 AUG 2010

4,42032010


NAVY2010FY


BETHESDA, MARYLAND

P110

(NSWC CARDEROCK)



2. Basis:

(C) Date design completed

(D) Percent completed as of

(E) Percent completed as of

(F) Type of design contract

(G) Parametric Estimate used to develop cost

(H) Energy Study/Life Cycle Analysis performed

(A) Standard or Definitive Design

(B) Where design was previously used

(A) Production of plans and specifications

(B) All other design costs

3. Total cost (C) = (A) + (B) = (D) + (E):

(C) Total

(D) Contract

(E) In-house

$0

5. Construction start:

4. Contract award:

6. Construction complete:

September 2008

January 2009

JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:

The (CERTIFYING OFFICIAL) certifies that this project has been considered for joint use

potential. (TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDED) is recommended. (UNILATERAL STATEMENT, if

Unilateral Construction is selected)

Major Equipment

Fund

Year

Funding

Source

Installation

Start-End

Mo/Yr

Shakedown

Start-End

Mo/Yr

IOC

Date

Mo/Yr Cost5-TON BRIDGE CRANE

MODULAR FURNITURE

OPN

OPN

2012

2012

75,000

40,000

B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from other

appropriations:

P-110 Economic Analysis

P-110 Site Plan

P-110 Facility Planning Document (FPD)

P-110 Supporting Photographs

P-110 Location Plan

P-110 Floor Plan

P-110 Basic Facility Requirement (BFR)

P-110 Cost Estimate

Attachments:

Richard S. Klein 215-897-7774Activity POC: Phone No:

Enclosure 2

Enclosure 2

Documents

National Capital Planning Commission Project Narrative