Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
National
Assessment of
Educational
Progress (NAEP)
Trial Urban District Assessment - Mathematics 2017
General Information
Mathematics2
What is NAEP?
The only assessment that measures what U.S. students know and can do in various subjects across the nation, states, and 27 urban districts.
NAEP results are released as “The Nation’s Report Card”
www.nationsreportcard.gov
3
What does NAEP measure?
Overall student performance for key demographic groups
Change over time
Differences between the nation, states, and urban districts
4
Trial Urban District Assessment5
NAEP School and Student Selection
1. Identify all eligible schools
2. Sample schools 3. Sample students
6
Sample Sizes (National Public)
Based on representative samples
7
Schools Students Schools Students
Grade 4 7,440 144,000 7,440 143,400
Grade 8 6,150 140,200 6,150 137,200
Mathematics Reading
NOTE: Student sample sizes rounded to the nearest hundred. School sample sizes rounded to the nearest
ten.
NAEP Administration
Six week period
Each student assessed in one subject
Students take a small portion of the assessment
Accommodations provided as necessary for
students with disabilities
English language learners
8
How is Student Mathematics
Performance Reported?
Scale Scores: Student performance is reported as an average score based on the NAEP scale, which ranges from 0 to 500.
Achievement Levels:
Basic – denotes partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at each grade
Proficient – represents solid academic performance
Advanced – represents superior performance
9
Mathematics Grade 4 – Overall
Change in Average Scale Score: 2015-2017C
leve
lan
d
Det
roit
Dal
las
Ch
arlo
tte
Ho
ust
on
Ph
ilad
elp
hia
Au
stin
Larg
e C
ity
Jeff
erso
n C
ou
nty
(K
Y)
Bo
sto
n
New
Yo
rk C
ity
DC
PS
Los
An
gele
s
Alb
uq
uer
qu
e
Nat
ion
al P
ub
lic
Ch
icag
o
Bal
tim
ore
Cit
y
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
(FL
)
Mia
mi-
Dad
e
Atl
anta
Fres
no Sa
n D
iego
Du
val C
ou
nty
(FL
)
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Ch
ange
in A
vera
ge S
cale
Sco
re
Darker shaded bars indicate significant change
Mathematics Grade 8 –Overall
Change in Average Scale Score: 2015-2017P
hila
del
ph
ia
Ho
ust
on
Dal
las
Fres
no
Atl
anta
Bo
sto
n
Alb
uq
uer
qu
e
Mia
mi-
Dad
e
Jeff
erso
n C
ou
nty
(K
Y)
Au
stin
New
Yo
rk C
ity
Bal
tim
ore
Cit
y
Larg
e C
ity
Nat
ion
al P
ub
lic
Ch
icag
o
Du
val C
ou
nty
(FL
)
Ch
arlo
tte
Det
roit
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
(FL
)
San
Die
go
Cle
vela
nd
Los
An
gele
s
DC
PS
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Ch
ange
in A
vera
ge S
cale
Sco
re
Darker shaded bars indicate significant change
Fresno Unified Trends in Mathematics
219 218 220 218221
258 256260
257 255
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Grade 4
Grade 8
12
Mathematics Grade 4 – Overall
2017 Average Scale Score for TUDAsD
etro
it
Ph
ilad
elp
hia
Cle
vela
nd
Bal
tim
ore
Cit
y
Milw
auke
e
Fres
no
Los
An
gele
s
Shel
by
Co
un
ty (
TN)
Den
ver
New
Yo
rk C
ity
Alb
uq
uer
qu
e
Cla
rk C
ou
nty
(N
V)
Fort
Wo
rth
DC
PS
Atl
anta
Larg
e C
ity
Ch
icag
o
Jeff
erso
n C
ou
nty
(K
Y)
Bo
sto
n
Dal
las
Ho
ust
on
San
Die
go
Nat
ion
al P
ub
lic
Gu
ilfo
rd C
ou
nty
(N
C)
Au
stin
Ch
arlo
tte
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
(FL
)
Mia
mi-
Dad
e
Du
val C
ou
nty
(FL
)
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
250
255
260
Ave
rage
Sca
le S
core
Mathematics Grade 8 - Overall
2017 Average Scale Score for TUDAsD
etro
it
Milw
auke
e
Fres
no
Bal
tim
ore
Cit
y
Shel
by
Co
un
ty (
TN)
Cle
vela
nd
Ph
ilad
elp
hia
DC
PS Atl
anta
Los
An
gele
s
Dal
las
Fort
Wo
rth
Alb
uq
uer
qu
e
Jeff
erso
n C
ou
nty
(K
Y)
Den
ver
Cla
rk C
ou
nty
(N
V)
Ho
ust
on
Mia
mi-
Dad
e
Larg
e C
ity
New
Yo
rk C
ity
Du
val C
ou
nty
(FL
)
Ch
icag
o
Gu
ilfo
rd C
ou
nty
(N
C)
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
(FL
)
Bo
sto
n
Nat
ion
al P
ub
lic
San
Die
go
Au
stin C
har
lott
e
235
240
245
250
255
260
265
270
275
280
285
290
295
300
Ave
rage
Sca
le S
core
Mathematics Grade 4 – Overall
Percent At or Above Basic: 2017D
etro
it
Ph
ilad
elp
hia
Cle
vela
nd
Milw
auke
e
Bal
tim
ore
Cit
y
Fres
no
Los
An
gele
s
Shel
by
Co
un
ty (
TN)
Den
ver
Dis
tric
t o
f C
olu
mb
ia (
DC
PS)
Atl
anta
Alb
uq
uer
qu
e
New
Yo
rk C
ity
Larg
e ci
ty
Jeff
erso
n C
ou
nty
(K
Y)
Cla
rk C
ou
nty
(N
V)
Fort
Wo
rth
(TX
)
Ch
icag
o
Bo
sto
n
San
Die
go
Ho
ust
on
Dal
las
Nat
ion
al p
ub
lic
Gu
ilfo
rd C
ou
nty
(N
C)
Au
stin
Ch
arlo
tte
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
(FL
)
Du
val C
ou
nty
(FL
)
Mia
mi-
Dad
e
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Per
cen
t
Mathematics Grade 4 – Overall
Percent At or Above Proficient: 2017D
etro
it Cle
vela
nd
Bal
tim
ore
Cit
y
Milw
auke
e
Ph
ilad
elp
hia
Fres
no
Shel
by
Co
un
ty (
TN)
Los
An
gele
s
Fort
Wo
rth
(TX
)
New
Yo
rk C
ity
Den
ver
Cla
rk C
ou
nty
(N
V)
Alb
uq
uer
qu
e
Ch
icag
o
Atl
anta
Bo
sto
n
Larg
e ci
ty
Dal
las
Dis
tric
t o
f C
olu
mb
ia (
DC
PS)
Ho
ust
on
Jeff
erso
n C
ou
nty
(K
Y)
San
Die
go
Nat
ion
al p
ub
lic
Gu
ilfo
rd C
ou
nty
(N
C)
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
(FL
)
Au
stin
Mia
mi-
Dad
e
Ch
arlo
tte
Du
val C
ou
nty
(FL
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Per
cen
t
Mathematics Grade 8 – Overall
Percent At or Above Basic: 2017D
etro
it
Bal
tim
ore
Cit
y
Milw
auke
e
Fres
no
Shel
by
Co
un
ty (
TN)
Cle
vela
nd
Ph
ilad
elp
hia
Dis
tric
t o
f C
olu
mb
ia (
DC
PS)
Atl
anta
Los
An
gele
s
Dal
las
Fort
Wo
rth
(TX
)
Alb
uq
uer
qu
e
Jeff
erso
n C
ou
nty
(K
Y)
Den
ver
Cla
rk C
ou
nty
(N
V)
Ho
ust
on
New
Yo
rk C
ity
Larg
e ci
ty
Gu
ilfo
rd C
ou
nty
(N
C)
Mia
mi-
Dad
e
Ch
icag
o
Du
val C
ou
nty
(FL
)
Bo
sto
n
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
(FL
)
San
Die
go
Au
stin
Nat
ion
al p
ub
lic
Ch
arlo
tte
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Per
cen
t
Mathematics Grade 8 – Overall
Percent At or Above Proficient: 2017D
etro
it Fres
no
Bal
tim
ore
Cit
y
Cle
vela
nd
Milw
auke
e
Shel
by
Co
un
ty (
TN)
Ph
ilad
elp
hia
Fort
Wo
rth
(TX
)
Atl
anta
Dal
las
Dis
tric
t o
f C
olu
mb
ia (
DC
PS)
Los
An
gele
s
Alb
uq
uer
qu
e
Ho
ust
on
Mia
mi-
Dad
e
Du
val C
ou
nty
(FL
)
Jeff
erso
n C
ou
nty
(K
Y)
Cla
rk C
ou
nty
(N
V)
Den
ver
Ch
icag
o
Larg
e ci
ty
New
Yo
rk C
ity
Hill
sbo
rou
gh C
ou
nty
(FL
)
Gu
ilfo
rd C
ou
nty
(N
C)
Bo
sto
n
Nat
ion
al p
ub
lic
San
Die
go
Au
stin
Ch
arlo
tte
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Per
cen
t
Mathematics 2017 - Average
Scale Scores by Student Group
238
215
219 225
205
192
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
Grade 4
White Black Hispanic
Asian ELL SWD278
242 251
268
219
219
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
Grade 8
White Black Hispanic
Asian ELL SWD
19
Grade 4
Mathematics 20
Mathematics Grade 4 – Average
Scale Score for California TUDAs21
219 2
22
236 2
39
218
223
239
240
220
228
241
241
218
224
232
238
221 223
237 239
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
Fresno Los Angeles San Diego National Public
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
Trends in Mathematics Nationwide –
Grade 422
224
228230
231233
235
230232
234
237239 239 240 241
238 239
219218
220218
221
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Large City
National
Public
Fresno
Mathematics Grade 4 – Percent At or
Above Basic for California TUDAS23
58 61
77 8
1
72
56
63
80 82
74
59
69
81 82
75
55
64
73
81
75
60 61
76 79
71
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Fresno Los Angeles San Diego National
Public
Large Cities
Pe
rce
nt 2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
NAEP Trend by Student Group in
Mathematics - Grade 424
23
7
213
216
22
0
207
190
238
214
214
222
202
186
241
211
217
221
205
187
235
213
214 226
202
189
238
215
219
225
205
192
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
White Black Hispanic Asian EL SWD
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
Mathematics Grade 4 – White-Black Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009-201725
213 214211 213 215
237 238241
235238
24 24 30 22 23
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
Black White
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
Mathematics Grade - White-Hispanic Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009-201726
216 214217
214219
237 238241
235238
21 2424
2119
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
Hispanic White
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
Mathematics Grade 4 – NSLP Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009 - 201727
216 215 217 215219
244
252
246251
242
2837 29 36 23
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
NSLP Eligible NSLP Not Eligible
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
Mathematics Grade 4 – SWD Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009-201728
190186 187 189
192
221 221 223220
224
31 35 36 3132
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
SD Not SD
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
Mathematics Grade 4 – ELL Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009 - 201729
207202
205202
205
224 224 225 224227
17 22 20 2222
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
ELL Not ELL
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.
Mathematics Grade 4 – Gender Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009 - 201730
218 217 219 219222
220 218 220216
221-2 -1 -1 3
1
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
Male Female
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
Grade 8
Mathematics31
Mathematics Grade 8 –Average Scale
Score for California TUDAs32
25
8
25
8
280
282
271
256 2
61
278 2
83
274
260 264
27
7
284
276
257
264
281
281
274
255
267
283
282
274
240
245
250
255
260
265
270
275
280
285
290
Fresno Los Angeles San Diego National
Public
Large Cities
2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Trends in Mathematics Nationwide –
Grade 8
276 278 280 282 283 284281 282
262265
269271
274 276 274 274
258 256 260257 255
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
National Public Large City Fresno
33
Mathematics Grade 8 – Percent At or
Above Basic for California TUDAS34
46
46
68 71
60
43 4
9
66 7
2
63
48 5
4
65
73
65
44
52
70
70
62
41
53
68 69
61
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Fresno Los Angeles San Diego National
Public
Large Cities
Pe
rce
nt
2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
NAEP Trend by Student Group in
Mathematics - Grade 835
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
White Black Hispanic Asian EL SWD
2009
2011
2013
Mathematics Grade 8 – White-Black Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009-201736
246243
247242 242
282 281 279 281278
36 38 32 39 36
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
Black White
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.
Mathematics Grade 8 – White-Hispanic Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009-201737
253 251256
252 251
282 281 279 281278
29 30 23 29 27
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
Hispanic White
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.
Mathematics Grade 8 – NSLP Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009-201738
253 251
257
251 251
293289
280 282
27240
38 23 3121
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
NSLP Eligible NSLP Not Eligible
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.
Mathematics Grade 8 – SWD Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009-201739
222 221
262 260263 261
258
4048
4247 39
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
NAEP Mathematics Grade 8 ─ Students with DisabilitiesGap - Average Scale Score: 2003-2017
SD Not SD
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.
Mathematics Grade 8 – EL Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009-201740
234
228 229 227
265 263 265 263260
3135 36 36
41
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
NAEP Mathematics Grade 8 ─ English Language LearnersGap - Average Scale Score: 2003-2017
ELL Not ELL
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.
Mathematics Grade 8 – Gender Gap
Average Scale Score: 2009-201741
261256
262
256 254
255 256 257 258 256
6 05 -2 -2
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
Scal
e Sc
ore
Male Female
NOTE: The NAEP Mathematics scale ranges from 0 to 500. Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant.
