47
Nathaniel Whitaker Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Nathaniel WhitakerNathaniel Whitaker

Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis

University of Massachusetts

Amherst

Page 2: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Modeling of Tumor Induced Modeling of Tumor Induced AngiogenesisAngiogenesis

Collaborators: P. Kevrekidis, D.Good, G.Herring, H.Harrington, M. Maier, L. Naidoo , Rong Shao

Page 3: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 4: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

5 Species Diagram5 Species Diagram

Page 5: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Good et alGood et alPNASPNAS

Page 6: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Anderson and Chaplain(1998)Kevrekidis, Whitaker, Good(2004)Kevrekidis, Whitaker, Good, Herring(2006)Stokes and Lauffenburger(1991)Levine et al (2002)Anderson (2005)

Page 7: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 8: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

After Discretization We Get…After Discretization We Get…

C(n, k+1) = PrC(n-1, k) + PsC(n,k) + PlC(n+1, k)

F(n, k+1) = F(n,k)*(1 – Δt k2 P(n,k) )

P(n, k+1) = P(n, k) (1 – Δt k6 – Δt k3 I(n,k)

+ T(n,k) (Δt k4 C (n,k) + Δt k5)

I(n, k+1) = I(n,k) (1 – Δt k3 P(n,k) )

T = e-(x – L)²/ε (constant)

Page 9: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Parameters of TermsParameters of Terms

DC=.00035, DP=1, k2=k3=k4=.1K5=.2, fF=a1*c, fT=a4*c, fI=a2*c/(1+a3*T)Epsilon=.45Relevant length scale=2mmRelevant time scale 1.5 days

Page 10: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

1-D without Inhibitor1-D without Inhibitor

Page 11: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

1-D with Inhibitor1-D with Inhibitor

Page 12: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 13: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

After Discretization (2 Dimensions)…

C(n, m, k+1) = Pr C(n-1, m, k) + Pl C(n+1, m, k) + Ps C(n, m, k) + Pu C(n, m-1, k) + Pd C(n, m+1, k)

F(n, m, k+1) = F(n, m, k)*(1 – Δt k2 P(n, m, k) )

P(n, m, k+1) = P(n, m, k) (1 – Δt k6 – Δt k3 I(n, m, k) + T(n, m, k) (Δt k4 C (n, m, k) + Δt k5)

I(n, m, k+1) = I(n, m, k) (1 – Δt k3 P(n, m, k) )

T = e-[(x – L)² + (y-L) ²]/ε (constant)

Page 14: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

2-D without inhibitor2-D without inhibitor

Page 15: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

2-D Statistics without Inhibitor2-D Statistics without Inhibitor

25 Runs using same initial conditionsAverage arrival time of 6.6Standard deviation 1.6186Average length 3.25 mm(Grid size 10 m m)

Page 16: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

2-D with Inhibitor in between2-D with Inhibitor in between

Page 17: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

2-D Statistics with Spot 2-D Statistics with Spot InhibitorInhibitor

10 Runs using same initial conditionsAverage arrival time of 33.08Standard deviation 3.2291Average length 9.38 mm(Grid size 10 m m) Fits Arc of circle of radius .49

centered at (.5, .25).

Page 18: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

2-D Inhibitor Ring2-D Inhibitor Ring

Page 19: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

2-D Statistics with Inhibitor 2-D Statistics with Inhibitor RingRing

10 Runs using same initial conditionsAverage arrival time of 35.08Standard deviation .8550Average length 8.84 mm(Grid size 10 m m)Inhibitor= sech(100*(r-.1)) where r

is the distance from tumor.

Page 20: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Time =0Time =0

Page 21: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Time=10Time=10

Page 22: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Time=20Time=20

Page 23: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Time=35Time=35

Page 24: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Angiogenesis in the CorneaAngiogenesis in the CorneaBiological TerminologyBiological Terminology

Angiogenesis: The process of formation of capillary sprouts in response to external chemical stimuli which leads to the formation of blood vessels.

Tumor Angiogenic Factors (TAFs): Stimuli secreted by Tumors

Inhibitors: Prevent vessels from getting to tumor. They are given off by the body and can be injected to prevent capillary growth toward the tumor.

Anastomosis: The termination of vessel formation upon intersection with a pre-existing vessel.

Branching: The generation of new capillary sprouts from the tip of a pre-existing vessel.

Page 25: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Angiogenesis: Cornea(Tong Angiogenesis: Cornea(Tong &Yuan)&Yuan)

∂C/∂t = DΔC - k C – u L C – D = Diffusion Coefficient C = Tumor Angiogenic Factors (TAF)– k = rate constant of inactivation u = rate constant of uptake– L = total vessel length per unit area ΔC = ∂²C/∂x² + ∂²C/∂y²

f(C) =

– Ct = Threshold Concentration α = constant that controls shape of the curve

n = Smax f(C) Δl Δt– (probability for the formation of 1 sprout from a vessel segment)

– Smax = rate constant that determines max probability of sprout formation

0, 0 ≤ C ≤ Ct

1 – e-α(C – Ct), Ct ≤ C

Page 26: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 27: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Angiogenesis in the CorneaAngiogenesis in the CorneaMathematical ModelMathematical Model

∂C/∂t = DcΔC - d C – u L C – Dc = Diffusion Coefficient C = Tumor Angiogenic Factors (TAF)– d = rate constant of inactivation u = rate constant of uptake– L = total vessel length per unit area ΔC = ∂²C/∂x² + ∂²C/∂y²

f(C) =

– Ct = Threshold Concentration α = constant that controls shape of the curve

∂I/∂t = DIΔI - kI I C – DI = Diffusion Coefficient– C = Tumor Angiogenic Factors (TAF)– ΔI = ∂²I/∂x² + ∂²I/∂y²– kI = rate constant of Inhibitor depletion influenced by the TAF

f(I) =

– It = Threshold Concentration α = constant that controls shape of the curve

0, 0 ≤ C ≤ Ct

1 – e-α(C – Ct), Ct ≤ C

0, 0 ≤ I ≤ It

1 – e-α(I – It), It ≤ I

Page 28: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 29: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Probability of BranchingProbability of Branching

n = Smax f(C) Δl Δt Represents positive effect TAF has on branching.

m = - Smax f(I) Δl Δt Represents negative effect the Inhibitor has on branching.

– Smax = rate constant that determines max probability of sprout formation.

– Δl = the total vessel length

Combined Probability: max (n + m, 0)

Page 30: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Cornea without InhibitorCornea without Inhibitor

Page 31: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Cornea with Geometric Cornea with Geometric InhibitorInhibitor

Page 32: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Initial Inhibitor in CorneaInitial Inhibitor in Cornea

Page 33: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Initial Inhibitor around tumorInitial Inhibitor around tumor

Page 34: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

ShaoShaoet et alal

Page 35: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 36: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 37: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 38: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 39: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 40: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 41: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 42: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 43: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 44: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 45: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst
Page 46: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Present and Future WorkPresent and Future Work

Presented 2 models for Angiogenesis withInhibitors. Difficult to find coefficients.Dr Shao, at Baystate medical center, breast

cancer research(experimentalist).Approximate coefficients for models

experimentally, 2 species at a timeExperiment HMVEC and VEGF, Human

Microvascular endothelial cells and Vascular endothelial cell growth factor.

Page 47: Nathaniel Whitaker Modeling Tumor Induced Angiogenesis University of Massachusetts Amherst

Conclusions and Future WorkConclusions and Future Work

First model for angiogenesis incorporating inhibitors.

PDE is interpreted as biased random walkSecond model with cell motion derived at the

particle level.Experiments to validate the model and

determine correct coefficients.