Upload
yashnaudiyal
View
2.951
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Evaluating NAFTA
Citation preview
NORTH AMERICAN FREE
TRADE AGGREMENT
NAFTA
Introduction Administrative center ,Mexico City, Ottawa and Washington, D.CMembership Canada Mexico United States
Estd- 01 Jan 994• 1988 – Canada & US – Canada & US FTA• 1992 - Mastricht Treaty in Europe- Creation Of
EU• 1994 - CUFTA Incls Mexico – Birth Of NAFTA
Goal : Eliminate trade barriers amongst members• Immediate- Tariff eliminated on more than
1/2 of US imports to Mexico & 1/3 of Mexican Imports to US
• All US Mexico tarrifs to be eliminated within 10 yrs (Except Some Agri Exports)
• Mexico to remove all tariffs within next 15 Yrs • US Canada Trade was already duty free.• Seeks to eliminate non tariff barriers.
MECHANISM: Chapter 20 deals with dispute resolution amongst the member states.. Modeled after Ch – 18 of US Canada FTA (5 Part mechanism)• Chapter 19 on antidumping and countervailing duties• Chapter 20 on general disputes.• Chapter 11 on investment• NAAEC ( North Am Agreement On Environmental Co-Operation) Article 14-15 Citizen’s Submission on Environmental Enforcement.• NAAEC Part 5 Party-to-Party Disputes on Environmental Enforcement
NAFTA- Hopes Promote competition in free trade area International Environment Maastricht
Agreement & EU Huge disparities between US & MexicoMight reduce poverty in Mexico
NAFTA - Fears
• “Giant Sucking Sound” of Jobs & Investment– US workers loss- Mexican workers
gain
• US Trade Deficit
• Environmental problems
Impact of NAFTA
US JOBSTradeEffect on Mexico
Manufactured Goods Deficit didn’t Grow from 2000 to 2009
US JOBS
Only 8 % of US manufactured goods Trade deficit has been with NAFTA
92 % of the trade deficit was with ROW
Trade Deficit & US JOBS
Does Not Account for 5 mn Lost Jobs
76 % Of Mexican Trade is oriented towards USA
Trade Amongst NAFTA
1990 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
GDP Growth Rates NAFTA members
CANUSAMEX
%
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
World
World
Effect On GDP
Mexico’s 76 % Trade orientation towards US should have accounted for commensurate growth in Mexico
Macroeconomics - Mexico1994 2004*
Population (millions) 91 105
Nominal GDP ($US billions) 422 677
GDP, PPP** Basis ($US billions)
671 1,017
Per Capita GDP ($US) 4,617 6,450
Per Capita GDP in $PPPs 7,351 9,680
Total Merchandise Exports (US$ billions)
71 215
Exports as % of GDP 17% 32%
Total Merchandise Imports (US$billions)
91 216
Imports as % of GDP 22% 32%
Public Debt/GDP 32% 23%
Poverty levels
No Change in Poverty Levels/ South has remained untouched by NAFTA
Agriculture
Agriculture contributes 8 percent to Mexico’s gross domestic product (GDP) and employs about 22 percent of the labor force (about 8 million workers). For the United States, agriculture comprises only 2 percent of GDP and employs about 2.7 percent of the labor force (a bit under 4 million workers).
Tariffs removal for agricultural produce is Exempt under NAFTA. Yr 2000 US Corn Subsidies totaled $ 10.1 bn against $ 5 Bn Mexico’s total Agri Export to US
Maquiladoras Effect• Factories, Called Maquiladoras, are built on
Mexican border and workers are hired there to make goods at much lower wages than USA
• Min Wages – USA- $5.15/h- Mexico- $ 3.4 / Day( Global Compensation Watch, The NAFTA Index, 1998)
Most production is Assembly operation rather than independent production
• 3 Day Blinds • 20th Century Plastics • Acer Peripherals • Bali Company, Inc. • Bayer Corp./Medsep • BMW • Canon Business Machines • Casio Manufacturing • Chrysler • Daewoo • Eastman Kodak/Verbatim • Eberhard-Faber • Eli Lilly Corporation • Ericsson • Fisher Price • Ford • Foster Grant Corporation • General Electric Company • JVC • GM • Hasbro • Hewlett Packard • Hitachi Home Electronics
•Honda •Honeywell, Inc. •Hughes Aircraft •Hyundai Precision America •IBM •Matsushita •Mattel •Maxell Corporation •Mercedes Benz •Mitsubishi Electronics Corp. •Motorola •Nissan •Philips •Pioneer Speakers •Samsonite Corporation •Samsung •Sanyo North America •Sony Electronics •Tiffany •Toshiba •VW •Xerox •Zenith
Companies with
Overall Impact NAFTA so far has enhanced Mexico's ability to supply American manufacturing firms with low cost parts• Helped American firms get competitive. ( especially auto industry)• Not helped Mexico turn into independently productive economy.
Disappointing progress in reducing the poverty in Mexico.• Low tax base, Low education investment, High inequality, Compition with china
No “ Giant sucking sound” of jobs and investment. Till 2004 US Mfg in last 10 yrs was up 41% as compared to 34 % in the decade preceding 1994
Other Factors Besides NAFTA That Have Affected U.S. Trade with Mexico• A sudden decline in the value of the peso at the end of 1994 (reduced U.S. exports to
Mexico and increased U.S. imports from Mexico)• Mexican recession in 1995 (lowered Mexico's demand for exports, including those of US)• The long U.S. economic expansion that lasted through most of the 1990s (which increased
U.S. demand for imports from all countries)• Recessions in the US and Mexico 2000-2001 (Reduced Mexican and US demand)
NAFTA EFFECT ON CANADA Benefited the most. Averaged 3.3% growth rates as compared to US’s 2.7%. Canadian Manufacturing employment held stedy overall employment up to 15.7 mn in early 2000s from 14.9 mn pre NAFTA.