Upload
julien-grollier
View
376
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Fostering Equity and Accountability in the Trading System (FEATS)
Angela Mulenga, Centre Coordinator,CUTS Africa Resource Centre, Lusaka
6 April 2009
Economic background
Explanation of Malawi trade policy◦ Trade policy process◦ Key government institutions◦ Consultative mechanisms
Stakeholder views ◦ MOIT, other government institutions, private sector, CSOs
Inclusive Trade Policy Making (ITPM) index
◦ Landlocked, sparsely populated, 2006, 82% of total population lived in rural areas
◦ GDP per capita increased slightly in nominal terms since 1995
◦ Real GDP growth rate stood at -0.4% during the same period.
◦ Recent years have seen more robust real GDP growth rates, estimated at 7.9% (2006), 6.8% (2007) and 5.1% (2008).
◦ 54% of the population under the national poverty line in 2004
◦ In 2004-2005, 73.9% of population living below $1.25 US dollars per day and 94% below $2.00 US dollars per day
◦ Agriculture provides bulk of the employment opportunities, although its prominence is decreasing In 2003, 73.6% of those employed in Malawi were employed in
informal sector
Nearly even balance of payments in 1999◦ Substantial deficit has developed
In 2007 imports were valued at 41% of GDP, almost double exports, valued at 23% of total GDP
Recent Developments ◦ Improved macroeconomic stability: positive impact on current
account deficit which has stabilized since 2007 ◦ Progress in diversifying exports away from the traditional
products (rice, coffee, pulses)◦ Still struggling to compete in international markets in apparel◦ Imports : industrial inputs (petroleum, fertilizer, consumer
goods and transportation equipment) and significant amount of food
Trade Shares in regional agreements◦ 2007, 21.1% and 35.7% of total exports to COMESA and SADC member countries respectively◦ 2007, 10.2% and 53.9% of total imports from COMESA and SADC member countries respectively
Import Source
% Share in
Total Imports
Export destination % Share in
Total ExportsSouth Africa 34.9 South Africa 12.4India 8.2 Germany 12Zambia 7.8 Egypt 9.4Tanzania 5.9 Zimbabwe 8.3United States
5.9 United States 7.5
• Malawi`s major trading partners are its neighbours: South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
• Indicates the importance of a trade policy that maximizes potential for regional trade.
• Policy prioritizes multilateral integration and participation in trade systems
• Malawi has not signed an EPA with the EU
• Benefits from AGOA, EBA, Cotonou, WTO, Special access as per WTO Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration, GSPs, SADC FTA, COMESA FTA and bilateral agreements
After independence, policy is based on Policy Framework Papers, no official trade policy ◦ Government ownership, influence and control characterized the economy. ◦ Centered on import substitution and other interventionist measures ◦ Efforts to reconcile balance of payment deficits and inflation
1980, Malawi implemented Structural Adjustment Policies (SAPs)
1990s onward, liberal reforms, including trade liberalization World Bank TTRI data shows increasing openness of Malawi
trade regime ◦ TTRI rating for MFN applied tariffs decreased over 2005-2007 to 2008
from 25.4 to 20.5◦ Overall TTRI rating declined over 2005-2007 to 2008 from 22.4 to 13.4
Malawi participation in IF processes◦ IF participation began in 2001, has helped to include trade policy into
overall development strategies of the country◦ DTIS was approved in 2004 and findings have been incorporated into
National Growth Strategy of 2003, PRSP, and MGDS◦ Zambia currently preparing a 5 yr. Implementaion plan for the EIF
Government’s vision is “transforming Malawi from a predominantly importing and consuming country to a predominantly producing and exporting country”
Works to: ◦ diversify exports ◦ enable a more stable, conducive environment for trade ◦ open Malawi to exports, imports and foreign direct investment◦ improve standards of living◦ create employment ◦ strengthen balance of payments
• Although Malawi strives to maintain an open economy, barriers to exports and imports still exist and affect trade (tariffs, international standards applied, privatization is occurring although state owned firms still exist) Anti-dumping, countervailing and safeguard measures are being established, environmental, health, safety and security standards
“Demand-driven” process Policies set up by means of legislation, Hierarchy: Constitution, followed by Acts
of Parliament and "subsidiary instruments" (e.g. government regulations, orders, and guidelines)
Presidential Directives Changes emanate from the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Private Sector
Development inter-agency meetings , NWGTP The recommendations from inter-agency meetings are submitted to the
Minister of Industry and Trade through the Director of Trade and Principal Secretary
Cabinet Papers are then created Cabinet Approves: incorporates into policy or pushes into the law making
process Attorney-General's Office drafts the related bill with input from relevant
minister Adopted by the Cabinet Bill is published in the Government Gazette, generally for at least 21 days. Introduced in the Parliament If passed, with Presidential assent becomes law
INTER-AGENCY MEETINGS make recommendations
-Ministry of Trade and Industry -Stakeholders
QUARTERLY MEETINGS make recommendations
-chaired by private sector -co-chaired by Ministry of Trade
and Industry -civil society -academia -media -government sectoral ministries -cooperating partners -trade unions
MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND TRADE reviews
CABINET APPROVES -President -Sectoral Ministers -Vice President
LAWS Drafted by Ministry of Industry and Trade and Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs
POLICIES Approved and Instituted
PRESIDENT signs
MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND TRADE implements and reviews policies and
laws.
CABINET PAPERS Processed and drafted from
recommendations.
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY votes
TRADE POLICY MAKING PROCESS IN MALAWI
Ministry of Industry and Trade : manages and implements trade policy with support from technical institutions ◦ activities include: trade development, research, policy, advocacy and finance,
negotiations of multilateral, bilateral and regional trade agreements, development of a conducive trading environment, and increasing participation of Malawians in trading activities.
Other Government Bodies: ◦ Consulted during trade policy diagnostic planning and implementation◦ Invited to stakeholder consultation meetings◦ Can initiate comments and viewpoints◦ Key Actors: Reserve Bank, the Ministries of Finance and Economic Planning, and
Trade, National Economic Council, Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, Malawi Revenue Authority, Reserve Bank of Malawi, Malawi Bureau of Standards, Malawi Investment Promotion Agency, and Malawi Export Promotion Council (MEPC).
Inter-Ministerial Conferences: ministries provide input comment on relevant issues related to trade policy discussions on specific issues can be initiated as well
Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) : Started operating in Malawi from 1994 Economic and social issues took off around 2000. Vibrant CSO scene with many active organizations, although not
too many are working on trade issues MEJN and CISANET have projects in rural areas, yet rural reach of
CSOs must be strengthened given that most are based in urban areas
No formal representatives of informal sector in CSOs, yet CSO efforts to improve trade policy impact various disadvantaged groups in the policy process, including the informal sector
Private Sector: a number of private sector and business umbrella organizations Umbrella Organizations and sector-specific private sector
organizations participate in the trade policy making process individuals employed in the informal sector are not formally
represented by private business sector umbrella organizations, yet are indirectly included through efforts of these organizations to advance the interests of the sector as a whole
Both are most active in NWGTP and NAG
NWGTP - National Working Group on Trade Policy◦ advises the Government on all legislative and policy issues relating to trade◦ monitors implementation of trade arrangements and ensures conformity with
rules. ◦ consultation and cooperation among private sector, public sector , academia, civil
society and donors◦ chaired by a private-sector representative and co-chaired by MOIT◦ privately funded
NAG - The National Action Group ◦ works to deepen engagement between private and public sectors ◦ Includes: key economic ministers, key public sector institutions, CEOs of leading
investors and private sector representatives, heads of development partners and CSO partners
◦ sectoral working groups ◦ initiates ad hoc groups and dialogues ◦ works with government and donor processes to better integrate private sector
groups with International Organizations ◦ capacity-building activities
MNDTFP – Malawi National Development and Trade Policy Forum ◦ coordinates with the Malawian negotiators for the EPA with the
EU.
NEC – National Economic Council ◦ Publicly funded ◦ Reports to the President◦ Operationally linked with the Ministry of Finance and Economic
Planning◦ Advises the government and public on economic and
development policies◦ Aids in establishing national development goals and plans◦ Monitors implementation◦ Participatory approval ◦ Process: Technical Working Groups, comprising Council staff and
technical officers from line ministries, provide an interface between stakeholders to formulate and review policies
President National Economic Council (linked with MoFEP and Other Ministries)Cabinet
MOITIMC
NAG
NWGTP
MWGTPF
Other Line MinistriesMIPAMEPCMoA
Policy Direction
Policy Formulation
Policy Implementation
MOIT endeavors to consult as broadly as possible and uses the IMCs and the NWGTP for this purpose
According to some CSOs, lack of people participation in previous policies has resulted in policy failures◦ alliance of technocrats and donors determined national policies and invited CSOs
for endorsement ◦ Recently, some interest in removing these tendencies
External influences align the government away from CSOs and more toward multilateral institutions
Challenges:◦ Quickly evolving international trade scene requires timely and adequate
adjustments in the trade policy◦ Changes in government often lead to changes in policies mid way through
implementation◦ Limited human, technical and financial capacity to deal with a vast number of
issues and actors.
Two key suggestions:◦ Strengthen consultative fora (NWGTP and PPD) to ensure interests of stakeholders
considered◦ Institutional capacities of stakeholders should be enhanced
Example - Ministry of Agriculture Challenges:
◦ Pressure on limited technical, time and monetary resources◦ Little opportunity to build up a relationship of trust and a lack of sense of
ownership exists (consultants used)◦ Donor driven technical assistances tends to concentrate on donor
priorities◦ Inadequate coordination between government institutions◦ Lack of timely feedback on comments by the MOIT and COMESA/SADC
secretariats. Suggestions:
◦ Ministry of Economic Planning and Development (MoEPD) should take the lead role
◦ Technical assistance should be designed to transfer skills and knowledge and not to under-capacitate
◦ Strengthen government coordination via an independent coordinating government institution
◦ Build capacity: increase human resources, utilize available human resources and adequate financial resources
The private sector has been more active on policies related to international agreements and less on regional and domestic trade issues◦ Suggestions:
Addressing their own capacity constraints Providing less tight timelines Improving opportunities for participation for less
powerful private sector organizations, for example, Malawi Union for the Informal Sector, Indigenous Business Association, etc.
Good progress in terms of CSOs and government partnership
Government observes that some CSOs do not attend consultations despite being invited
Challenges: ◦ Generally more interest in multilateral trade issues ◦ Lack of adequate information on trade issues (especially
domestic)◦ Lack of analytical skills and competencies (technical
nature of trade policy)◦ Lack of resources for sustained engagement on trade
policy issues◦ Ideological differences between the private sector and
CSOs◦ Interests of citizens that are more focused on micro level
rather than larger issues
Recommendations:◦ Collection and use of evidence by CSOs for meaningful
participation◦ Undertaking and presenting analysis of trade policy
from poverty reduction perspectives◦ More CSO space in actual policy formulation ◦ Enacting legislation for CSO access to trade information◦ Dissemination of trade policy information to citizens◦ Strengthening CSO networking on trade◦ Prioritize citizen participation and action on trade
policies◦ Strengthening of trade weather stations and other
community based networks◦ Develop capacity of MOIT for more and better
consultations with all stakeholders.
The NWGTP is only for discussions and is not a decision-making forum
Several stakeholders are not currently represented in the process
The present process is producer-oriented and there is need for balancing producer and consumer interests
The role of parliament and parliamentarians should be strengthened
Relevant government agencies can improve the dissemination of information by simplifying the presentation and improving access
participation of CSOs and other relevant government ministries in the trade policy making process should be strengthened to include not only participation in discussions, but also in decision-making processes
No one-size-fits-all policy Economists generally agree that open trade policy is
good for development features of good policy include:
Coherence with national development policy Supportive of and be supported by other government
policies Balance the interests of all key stakeholders Conform with the commitments of the country under the
WTO and other regional and bilateral agreements Accompanied by an appropriate implementation plan
Determines whether the key features of good policy are attained which in turn determines the contents of policy.
May not result in best policy but context and country specific But widest possible buy-in and support from all key
stakeholders Support and ownership ensure policy’s relevance and
proper implementation. Outlining the key elements of the process also leads to
the identification of the relevant stakeholders. Important assumption: key stakeholders are an active
part of the process with opportunities for equal participation and proportionate influence.
Features of a Good Trade Policy Key Elements of Good Trade Policy Making Process
Relevant Stakeholders
Based on national development policy Clear guidance/directions from national development policy makers
National development policy makers (e.g., Ministry for Planning and Development, President’s Office, parliament, etc)
Linked with other governmental policies Inputs and feedback from other government ministries/departments
Other relevant government ministries/departments (e.g., those dealing with agriculture, employment and labour, finance, competition and consumer protection, education and health, etc.)
Linked with international commitments (to implement the commitments as well as to guide the positions regarding future possible commitments)
Inputs and feedback from relevant ministries and negotiators
Relevant ministries (e.g., Ministry of Foreign Affairs, etc.) and negotiators (e.g., dealing with the WTO agreements and negotiations)
Balancing the interests of all key stakeholders Inputs and feedback from key non-state stakeholders
Key non-state actors (e.g., representatives of the private sector, farmers, consumers, and the civil society)
Clear implementation plan with adequate resources
Commitment of required resources Relevant government ministries (e.g., Ministry of Finance) and donors (multilateral and bilateral)
• all the key stakeholders have been identified• they have equal opportunity to participate in the process• none of them is allowed to disproportionately influence the
process nor the outcome in favor of its own interests.– Seven action variables, applied in two different groups – Variables 1-4 require action of primary government ministry
in trade policy – Variables 5-7 require action of all other stakeholders– Three distinct indices are calculated for other relevant government
agencies, private sector, and CSO categories of stakeholders respectively
– maximum value of 1 (when the appropriate action has been taken by the concerned actor)
– intermediate value of .5 (when some action has been taken by the actor concerned but such is not sufficient).
– minimum value of zero (when the action has not been taken at all by the concerned actor)
– Overall ITPM rating out of 13, index includes 4 distinct parts
Increase awareness of political economy aspects of trade policy making in Malawi
Assess the inclusiveness of the trade policy making process in terms of capacities, actions, and participation of key stakeholder groups
Illustrate where further efforts must be made to improve stakeholder capacity and participation in trade policy process
Facilitate the development of a more inclusive trade policy making process to create local buy-in of that policy within Malawi Only such buy-in can ensure successful implementation of trade
policy and the subsequent realization of larger development goals of the country
Action Variable Action by Action ValueA. Identification of all key stakeholders
MOIT Some identified = .5
B. Creating awareness about the need for trade policy
MOIT Yes = 1.0
C. Establishment and functioning of formal consultative mechanisms
MOIT Several created and functioning = 1.0
D. Regular information flow to the stakeholders including on the content of trade policy
MOIT Ad hoc and/or irregular = 0.5
Part I Score MOIT 3.0/4.0E. Regular participation in the process and feedback to the relevant authorities
Other relevant government ministries/agencies
Yes = 1.0
F. Faithful representation of and regular feedback to the represented constituencies
Other relevant government ministries/agencies
Yes = 1.0
G. Acquiring relevant knowledge and expertise
Other relevant government ministries/agencies
Some knowledge and expertise = 0.5
Part II Score Other relevant government ministries/agencies
2.5/3.0
Action Variable Action By Action Value
H. Regular participation in the process and feedback to the relevant authorities
Private sector and business umbrella organizations
Yes = 1
I. Faithful representation of and regular feedback to the represented constituencies
Private sector and business umbrella organizations
Yes = 1
J. Acquiring relevant knowledge and expertise
Private sector and business umbrella organizations
Some knowledge and expertise = 0.5
Part III Score Private sector and business umbrella organizations
2.5/3.0
K. Regular participation in the process and feedback to the relevant authorities
Civil society organizations Irregular = 0.5
L. Faithful representation of and regular feedback to the represented constituencies
Civil society organizations Occasional representation and/or irregular feedback = 0.5
M. Acquiring relevant knowledge and expertise
Civil society organizations Some knowledge and expertise = 0.5
Part IV Score Civil society organizations 1.5/3.0
ITPM Index Score All stakeholders 9.5/13.0