24
Municipal Leadership for Afterschool: Citywide Approaches Spreading Across the Country Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Municipal Leadership for Afterschool: Citywide Approaches Spreading Across the Country Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Municipal Leadership for Afterschool:Citywide Approaches Spreading Across the Country

Wednesday, October 12, 20112:00 p.m. Eastern Time

www.nlc.org

Joining the webinar/logistical information

Joining the webinarAudio: Dial 1-877-643-6951, passcode: 22406188#

Visual: http://lotuslive.readyshow.com, passcode: 22406188

Asking a questionType your question into the lower right hand section of your screen.

Our Q&A session will begin about halfway through the call.

2

www.nlc.org

Format for today’s call

• Background and Overview• Key findings• Robbyn Wahby, City of St. Louis• Lynn Heemstra, City of Grand Rapids• Q&A

3

www.nlc.org

Background

2001: NLC begins offering site-level assistance on OST with support from Charles Stewart Mott Foundation2003: The Wallace Foundation invests in 5 city OST systems (NYC, Boston, Chicago, Providence, Washington DC)2006: Afterschool Policy Advisors Network launched

First National City Afterschool Summit2009: 34 cities involved in NLC afterschool projects2010: RAND’s Hours of Opportunity report2010-11: P/PV Providence AfterZones reports2010-11: NLC surveys and interviews 27 cities

4

www.nlc.org

Overview – How were cities selected?

Selection criteria:

Based on NLC’s work with hundreds of cities over a decade and consultations with national expertsCities with populations above 100,000More than 50% of student population eligible for free and reduced price mealsSignificant mayoral leadershipCoordinating entity to manage the OST systemProgress on six system-building elements identified by The Wallace Foundation

5

www.nlc.org

The 27 Cities

Alexandria, Va. Fort Worth, Texas Philadelphia, Pa.

Atlanta, Ga. Grand Rapids, Mich. Portland, Ore.

Baltimore, Md. Jacksonville, Fla. Rochester, N.Y.

Boise, Idaho Louisville, Ky. San Francisco, Calif.

Bridgeport, Conn. Nashville, Tenn. Spokane, Wash.

Charlotte, N.C. New Orleans, La. St. Louis, Mo.

Charleston, S.C. Newark, N.J. St. Paul, Minn.

Cleveland, Ohio Oakland, Calif. Seattle, Wash.

Denver, Colo. Omaha, Neb. Tampa, Fla.

6

www.nlc.org

Overview – System-building elements

Six elements of a coordinated OST system identified by The Wallace Foundation:

1. Committed leadership2. A public or private coordinating entity3. Multi-year planning4. Reliable information5. Expanding participation6. A commitment to quality

7

www.nlc.org

Key Findings: Before, silos hampered quality and access

SilosCities Oversee

Individual Programs

Gaps in Participati

on

Impact Unknown

Lack of Coordination

Gaps in Access

Variation in

Quality

8

SilosCities Oversee

Individual Programs

Gaps in Participati

on

Impact Unknown

Lack of Coordination

Gaps in Access

Variation in

Quality

www.nlc.org

Key Findings: Coordination improves quality and access

9

www.nlc.org

Key Findings: Data-driven Analysis10

www.nlc.org

Key Findings: Cities make data-informed decisions

11

www.nlc.org

Key Findings: Quality Matters12

www.nlc.org

Key Findings: Growing sophistication of citywide efforts

As their efforts deepen and mature, cities have adopted more sophisticated strategies that address more complex or deep-rooted challenges.

Examples:Quality Rating and Improvement SystemsManagement Information Systems

13

www.nlc.org

Key Findings: Municipal Financial Investment

City Hall

Libraries

Schools

Transportation

CBOs

Foundations

Parks and Recreatio

n

14

www.nlc.org

Key Findings: Varied Funding Strategies15

www.nlc.org

Key Findings: Change in how cities do business

The transition to a citywide approach alters perspectives, deepens local partnerships, improves sustainability and generates momentum for continuous improvement.

16

www.nlc.org

Impact: Cities use systems to improve services to kids

Grand Rapids, Mich. - Program participants less likely to participate in risky or criminal behaviors. 25% drop in juvenile offenses from 2006-09 as afterschool programming expanded

Bridgeport, Conn. - Lighthouse program participants outperformed district average on standardized test scores

Louisville, Ky. - better school attendance, behavior, and academic performance for regular program attendees

Portland, Ore. - improvement in reading and math scoresSt. Louis, Mo. - Better attendance and behavior; 3,200 new program slots addedDenver, Colo. - better school attendance, lower dropout ratesSan Francisco, Calif. - slots available for 94% of youth in 2009-10

17

www.nlc.org

More Information

Contact: Kim Eisenreich(202) [email protected]

National League of Cities Institute for Youth, Education and Families

1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20004www.nlc.org/iyef

The Wallace Foundation5 Penn Plaza, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10001

www.wallacefoundation.org

18

www.nlc.org

System-building elements

Six elements of a coordinated OST system identified by The Wallace Foundation:

1. Committed leadership2. A public or private coordinating entity3. Multi-year planning4. Reliable information5. Expanding participation6. A commitment to quality

7

www.nlc.org

Grand Rapids, Michigan Population 188,000 Youth population 46,50

www.nlc.org

Evaluation Efforts

1. Mapping of programs which included both survey and Youth Audit2. Gap Analysis in service and public demand

• Findings: Agencies at 50% capacity• 43% of youth being served• 51% programs offered by faith

community• 80% were non-fee based

3. Local Funding Analysis 4. Pilot of three neighborhoods and juvenile

crime data5. Comprehensive city-wide Grand Rapids

Juvenile Crime Index Report

www.nlc.org

What is the current state of afterschool programs in the county?

What is the capacity of programs? Are there waiting lists?

What are the gaps in service delivery based on census data and program capacity?

What are the shared outcomes among current afterschool programs?

Does current funding meet the need for afterschool programming?

www.nlc.org

Quality Efforts

• Developed Standards• Evaluated Tools• Self-Assessments• FYI: YPQA Training,

Commitment to Self-Assessments & External Assessment

• Building a system of training to credentials

www.nlc.org

Quality Improvement Steps

Step 3:Self-

Assessment

Step 3:Self-

Assessment

Step 1:Kickoff

Step 1:Kickoff

Step 4:Improvement

Planning

Step 4:Improvement

Planning

Step 5:MethodsTraining

Step 5:MethodsTraining

Step 6:Quality

Coaching

Step 6:Quality

Coaching

Year 1 Year 2

Becomes annual process

Step 2:SA

Training

Step 2:SA

Training