Upload
lenguyet
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Seite 1
Implementado por Implementado por
27.03.2014
Implementedo por
MRV of the Mexico building NAMA
Sustainable housing NAMA
Yuriana González Ulloa
GIZ, México
Berlin – Germany, 27 March, 2014
Seite 2
Implementado por
The Mexican-German Programme for NAMAs -
ProNAMA N
ew
re
sid
en
tia
l
bu
ild
ing
s (
CO
NA
VI)
Exis
tin
g r
esid
en
tial
bu
ild
ing
s (
CO
NA
VI)
Ro
ad
fre
igh
t
Tra
ns
po
rt (S
CT
)
En
erg
y E
ffic
ien
cy
in S
ME
(S
EN
ER
)
Cross-cutting: Establishment of a Mexican NAMA-Office (SEMARNAT)
Mexican – German
NAMA Program
2011 – 2015, German contribution: 7 Mio. Euro
Objective: Mexican NAMAs for residential buildings (new and existing), SMEs
and road freight transport are prepared for large scale implementation and
international co-financing, are partially implemented and a coordinating Mexican
NAMA-Office is established.
2
Seite 3
Implementado por
Principal objectives:
Larger penetration of basic efficiency standards (similar level a Hipoteca verde) to all new housing market for low-income families
Scale efficiency standards to more ambitious levels
NAMA program integrated to the National Housing Strategy.
1. Technical Design
2. MRV System
3. Financial mechanism
4. Pilot testing
5. Initial implementation
Housing NAMA
Seite 4
Implementado por
Technical Design
• Change focus: from independent technologies to a whole house approach
• Consider the primary energy demand (electricity, gas and water
consumption)
• Calculation of the total energy consumption for the three different types of
buildings (detached, row housing and vertical) in four bioclimatic zones
Aislada
Detached
Adosada row
housing
Vertical
Seite 5
Implementado por
Sampling cathegories
• Makes use of different prototypes (standards) on energy efficiency
performance:
• Eco-house 1, Eco-house 2 y Eco house Max
Consider differences in performance by:
• Bioclimatic zones in the country
• hot&dry, hot&humid, temperate, semi-cold
• Housing type
• Aislada, adosada y vertical (detached, row housing,
and vertical)
5
Seite 6
Implementado por
MRV System Overview
Ex – ante
• Simulation models according to the type of house, bioclimatic zone and standards on
energy efficiency (Eco-house 1, Eco-house 2 y Eco house Max)
Ex – post
• Sampling approach for each group of comparable houses
• Annual measurements of gas, electricity and water of NAMA houses
• Annual measurements of gas, electricity an water of reference houses
Calculation:
• Difference between the
results of NAMA houses and
reference houses:
ERy = BEy – PEy
Seite 7
Implementado por
Housing NAMA MRV System
7
Eco casa 1
Eco casa 2
Eco max
Simulation RUV registry
CUV audit
(verification)
NAMA registry
Compliance report
Simple (GEI) MRV system
Comprehensive MRV system
Feedback
Annual report
Sustainable housing project
1) Initial Phase 2) Monitoring Phase
• Electricity
• Gas
• Water
• Occupancy
• Indoor / outdoor temperature
• Inner wall temperature
• Indoor / outdoor humidity
• Air conditioning
• Lightning
• Appliances
• Sprinkler
• Kitchen faucets
• Tightness
• CO2 levels
• Cobenefits
• The simple (GHG) MRV system will monitor a representative
sample of homes, and estimate within a 90% level of
confidence the emissions performance of these houses by
tracking two + two key parameters
• The comprehensive MRV system will be installed in 3% of
monitored houses and collect data which can be used to: • calibrate GHG models • track non-GHG benefits, • measure “overall house performance” • Can be used to inform policy choices and technology
design.
Seite 8
Implementado por
Monitoring Protocol
Approval guidelines:
• Monitoring Features
• Parameters
• System Architecture
• Technical Specifications
• Installation of equipment
• Operation during monitoring campaign
• Data Validation
• Recommendations
• Reporting formats
<- Use of international guidance on
energy efficiency
Seite 9
Implementado por
Co-benefits selection – Selection analysis
27/03/2014
Stakeholders involved:
• Ministry of Land Use &
Planning
• National Development Bank
• Housing Commission
• Builder Associations
• Climate consultant
International Donors
• Cooperation Agencies
Seite 10
Implementado por
Co-benefits
27/03/2014 10
Source: GIZ/Thomson Reuters/Mesa Transversal. 2012
Type of co-benefict Parameter Indicator
Economic
·Economic savings for households reflected in
electricity, gas and water bills MXN
·Reduction on energy subsidy costs MXN
·Increase in number of green jobs Numbers of jobs created
Environment ·Air quality tones of CO; NO2; SO2; PM10
·Land use CONAVI location score
Social
·Improved comfort thermal confort - survey
·Access to clean energy services % houses with energy efficiency
measures
·Human and institutional capacity building # trainings, courses, talks
·Improved Health of living spaces survey
Seite 11
Implementado por
Scope Challenges Solutions
Institutional
Different initiatives (e.g. Ecocasa,
INFONAVIT) aiming to develop NAMA
packages Adopting a obligatory monitoring protocol
Need for one responsible institution
overseeing the MRV system and operating
the data base. Establish a NAMA coordinator - CONAVI
Lack of coordination of different NAMA
developers Steering committee sessions and MRV
working group
New Government administration and new
Ministry of Urban, Territorial and Agricultural
Development (SEDATU)
Capacity building – enroll. Cooperation
agencies – key role
27/03/2014
What were some of the challenges you were facing
and how did you overcome them? (1/2)
Seite 12
Implementado por
Scope Challenges Solutions
Financial
Monitoring costs Each NAMA implementor
responsible of monitoring costs.
Market uncertainties – affect housing
developers New financial mechanisms –
capacity building
Behavioural
Lack of access to houses: For meter reading
(or if surveys are undertaken), the houses
have to be accessed or the owner be
interviewed.
Contracts with householders and
provide owner with some
incentives, so that owner wants to
participate in the interviews.
Technology
availability Gas consumption from GLP cilinders - difficult
to measure.
Authorized gas technicians had
been contracted to install the gas
meters accurately.
27/03/2014
What were some of the challenges you were facing
and how did you overcome them? (2/2)
Seite 13
Implementado por
27/03/2014 13
Yuriana González Ulloa
Asesora Alianza Mexicana Alemana contra el
Cambio Climático
Componente Mitigación
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale
Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Odontología No. 1, piso 3
Col. Copilco, 01900, México, D.F
T + 52 (55) 6363 4291
I www.giz.de
¡Thank you for your attention!
http://www.conavi.gob.mx/viviendasustentable
Seite 15
Implementado por
Emission Reductions
• ERy = BEy – PEy
• Electric: Electricity consumption x Grid emission factor for electricity
generation (consumo electrico por el factor de emision de la red)
• Thermal: Fuel consumption x CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel type
(consumo de combustible por factor de emision por tipo de combustible fosil)
• Water: electricity from pumping (electricidad para bombeo)
27/03/2014 15
Seite 16
Implementado por
CONAVI Steering
Committee
Implementing entity
Monitoreo GEI
Monitoreo detallado
RUV
Monitoring
Protocols
Datos monitoreo
Develo_ pers
Users Financial institution
Identification
data
House
registration
data
Awareness House
selection
Coordination
Co
ord
ina
tio
n
Supervision Operation
NAMA Office
National
engagement
(Biennial
reports
UNFCCC)
Institutional structure
Seite 17
Implementado por
What do you do to maintain existing capacities for
the monitoring of NAMA impacts?
• National Housing Commission: creation of steering committee and
host database in existing system (create application programming
interfaces (API) to communicate with other institutions)
• Housing registry: adopting energy savings simulator built on existing
system; staff training for verification of measures.
• Housing developers: capacity building 1) energy savings and emission
reduction simulator and 2) on-site monitoring.
• Housing development banks: financial mechanism linked with minimum
energy performance standards.
27/03/2014 17