Upload
jean-powell
View
215
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MPPDA Research Committee
MPPDA Annual MeetingMPPDA Annual Meeting
Nashville 2013Nashville 2013
Why research for Med-Peds?
Insert plug to join the research committee Insert plug to join the research committee here.here.
Members
Michael Aronica MD, Chair, SUNY BuffaloMichael Aronica MD, Chair, SUNY Buffalo Bob Hopkins MD, U ArkansasBob Hopkins MD, U Arkansas Ronald Williams, Penn StateRonald Williams, Penn State Princess Dennar, TulanePrincess Dennar, Tulane Steve Strausbaugh, Case WesternSteve Strausbaugh, Case Western Depak Palaksheppa, MGHDepak Palaksheppa, MGH Patrice Thibodeau, MainePatrice Thibodeau, Maine Sharon Wretzel, BaystateSharon Wretzel, Baystate Anoop Agrawal, BaylorAnoop Agrawal, Baylor Jen Lindstrom, AlbanyJen Lindstrom, Albany
Review of Charges Developing a “gate-keeping” process such that all surveys and research Developing a “gate-keeping” process such that all surveys and research
data requests of the MPPDA membership are vetted by the committee.data requests of the MPPDA membership are vetted by the committee. Maintaining a database of publications authored by members of or about Maintaining a database of publications authored by members of or about
Med-Peds programsMed-Peds programs Updating the annual survey of Med-Peds Program Obtaining IRB approval Updating the annual survey of Med-Peds Program Obtaining IRB approval
with expectations of publishing data obtained in the annual program surveywith expectations of publishing data obtained in the annual program survey Submitting at least 1 (one) manuscript yearly for publicationSubmitting at least 1 (one) manuscript yearly for publication Creating an environment for Med-Peds collaborative research among Creating an environment for Med-Peds collaborative research among
programsprograms Keeping a list of active committee members for yearly submission to the Keeping a list of active committee members for yearly submission to the
Executive Committee for documentation of participationExecutive Committee for documentation of participation Preparing and presenting quarterly reports to the Executive Committee, Preparing and presenting quarterly reports to the Executive Committee,
including strategies for meeting objectives not currently met.including strategies for meeting objectives not currently met.
Deliverables for 2012-2013
Fourth Annual Med-Peds program Survey in Fourth Annual Med-Peds program Survey in Summer.Summer.
Format Med-Peds BibliographyFormat Med-Peds Bibliography Compile list of Med-Peds graduates from each Compile list of Med-Peds graduates from each
program and AAP program and AAP Med-Peds SectionMed-Peds Section
Long Term goals for the MPPDA research Committee Obtain annual MPPDA national survey data with Obtain annual MPPDA national survey data with
analysis and survey revision.analysis and survey revision. Support MPPDA in data collection for executive Support MPPDA in data collection for executive
committee initiativescommittee initiatives Improving research networking and development Improving research networking and development
of a National Med-Peds PBRN of a National Med-Peds PBRN Increase and support Med-Peds faculty publicationIncrease and support Med-Peds faculty publication
Annual Med-Peds Program Survey Program CharacteristicsProgram Characteristics RecruitmentRecruitment Program/Program Director SupportProgram/Program Director Support Ambulatory TrainingAmbulatory Training Board CertificationBoard Certification GraduatesGraduates Curriculum & Transitional committees Curriculum & Transitional committees MiscellaneousMiscellaneous
Annual Program Survey
Survey conducted during Summer 2012Survey conducted during Summer 2012 Contacts emails were found from MPPDA Contacts emails were found from MPPDA
& ACGME databases& ACGME databases SurveyMonkey survey method SurveyMonkey survey method 62 out of 77 programs responded (81% 62 out of 77 programs responded (81%
response rate)response rate)
Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Program Characteristics
ITEM Mean SD
Number of Residents/ Program
18.6’10/’11 = 18.1/18.6
+/- 8.3
Number of faculty FTE’s/Program
6.5’10/’11 = 6.9 /8.5
+/- 8.7 (Median=4)
Number of Core faculty FTE’s/Program
3.8
‘10/11 = 3.4/3.9
+/- 2.3
Year Program Started
1989 +/- 8.5 years
Mean number Resident/Faculty FTE = 2.9 (’10/’11 = 2.4/2.2)
Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Program Characteristics
ACGME Sponsoring InstitutionACGME Sponsoring Institution
Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Program/Program Director Support
ITEM MEAN SD
Length of Time as PD
6.1 years2011 = 6.1 years
+/- 4.3 Years
Age of PD 45 years +/- 11.7 years
PD annual salary $180,00010/11 = 169K/165K
+/- $36,900
Program Director time dedicated to program
0.41 FTE
‘10/’11 = 0.42/0.41
+/- 0.14 FTE
APD time 0.25 FTE‘10/’11 = 0.22/0.27
+/- 0.21 FTE
PA/PC time 0.77 FTE‘10/’11 = 0.76/0.68
+/- 0.55 FTE
Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Program/Program Director Support
PD Gender: 57% Male PD Gender: 57% Male ((‘‘10/10/’’11 = 55/52% male)11 = 55/52% male)
Have an APD: 61% of programs Have an APD: 61% of programs ((‘‘10/11= 66/68)10/11= 66/68)
Have a separate/own Program administrator: Have a separate/own Program administrator: 82% of programs 82% of programs ((‘‘10/10/’’11 = 82/79%)11 = 82/79%)
Have a Med-Peds Chief Resident: 93% of Have a Med-Peds Chief Resident: 93% of Programs Programs ((‘‘10/10/’’11 = 87/87%)11 = 87/87%)
Have a PD controlled Budget: 65% of Have a PD controlled Budget: 65% of Programs Programs ((‘‘10/10/’’11 = 57/63%)11 = 57/63%)
Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Program/Program Director Support
Ambulatory PD’s decreased from 42% to 37% from 2009. Hospitalist PD’s increased from 11% – 16%.
Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Ambulatory Training
ITEM Mean SD
Number of Continuity Sites
2.3 sites/ program(‘10/’11 = 2.2/2.3)
+/- 2.2 (Median=1)
NCQA Sites 0.6 sites/program +/- 1.0
24 Programs have at least 1 NCQA certified 24 Programs have at least 1 NCQA certified ambulatory clinicambulatory clinic
Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Graduates
Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Miscellaneous Programs with access to a handoff Programs with access to a handoff
curriculum: 91%curriculum: 91% Patient safety curriculum:Patient safety curriculum:
Own Program runs: 7%Own Program runs: 7% Core Programs run: 70%Core Programs run: 70% Institution Runs: 57%Institution Runs: 57%
Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Academic Productivity Program DirectorProgram Director
Manuscripts: 1.6/Program +/- 2.4 (median = 1)Manuscripts: 1.6/Program +/- 2.4 (median = 1) Poster Presentations: 1.7/Program +/- 2.4 (median = 1)Poster Presentations: 1.7/Program +/- 2.4 (median = 1) Oral Presentations: 2.2/Program +/- 3.1 (median = 2)Oral Presentations: 2.2/Program +/- 3.1 (median = 2)
ResidentsResidents Manuscripts: 2.9/Program +/- 3.1 (median = 2)Manuscripts: 2.9/Program +/- 3.1 (median = 2) Poster Presentations: 5.2/Program +/- 4.3 (median = Poster Presentations: 5.2/Program +/- 4.3 (median =
4.5)4.5) Oral Presentations: 3.8/Program +/- 3.7 (median = 3)Oral Presentations: 3.8/Program +/- 3.7 (median = 3)
Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Changes for 2013 NAS support questionsNAS support questions
Data on graduates who fail the certification Data on graduates who fail the certification examsexams