Mount Scio Road Storage Facility

Fellowship Consulting Eider Hernandez Jamie Hookey Stephen Reid Joshua Butler

MUN Facilities Management Jason Daniels P. Eng., M.A.Sc., P.M.P Scott Hills P.Eng.

February 4th, 2013 Engineering 8700 S. Bruneau

i | P a g e

Letter of Submittal Fellowship Consulting Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5 January 28, 2013

Facilities Management Project Plan Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5

Dear Facilities Management:

This correspondence outlines the complete scope of work you requested, including

objectives, schedules, deliverables, procedures, identification of responsibilities, and

estimated fees.

Construction of a warehouse facility for storage of documents and other forms of

records at the Mount Scio, Memorial University owned location. The warehouse facility

must have a potential of expansion and will include the need for occupancy on a semi-

permanent basis. The construction of this warehouse facility will provide short and long

term benefits for storage.

Sincerely,

Fellowship Consulting

ii | P a g e

Table of Contents Letter of Submittal ......................................................................................................................................... i

Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... ii

Project Description........................................................................................................................................ 1

Site Layout ................................................................................................................................................. 2

Project Requirements ................................................................................................................................... 3

Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 4

Group Approach ........................................................................................................................................ 4

Group Organization ................................................................................................................................... 4

Client Interaction and Role ....................................................................................................................... 5

Design Principles ....................................................................................................................................... 5

Cost Estimating ......................................................................................................................................... 5

Desired Outcomes ..................................................................................................................................... 5

Reporting and Deliverables ....................................................................................................................... 6

Troubleshooting ........................................................................................................................................ 6

Primary Tasks ................................................................................................................................................ 7

Site Assessment ........................................................................................................................................ 7

Site Access & Layout ................................................................................................................................. 7

Conceptual Design Phase .......................................................................................................................... 8

Structural System Requirements .............................................................................................................. 8

Structural System Design & Modeling ...................................................................................................... 9

Geotechnical Work & Foundation Design ................................................................................................. 9

Estimating & Scheduling ......................................................................................................................... 10

Tender Documentation & Presentation ................................................................................................. 10

Schedule ...................................................................................................................................................... 11

Deliverables................................................................................................................................................. 12

Cost ............................................................................................................................................................. 12

Risks ............................................................................................................................................................ 13

References .................................................................................................................................................. 13

APPENDIX A SOQ

1 | P a g e

Project Description Construction of a warehouse facility for storage of documents and other forms of records at the Mount Scio, Memorial University owned location. The warehouse facility must have a potential of expansion and will include the need for occupancy on a semi-permanent basis. The photos below display the existing decommissioned incinerator building currently on site.

Site Layout

Retrieved: Google Maps - ©2013 Google

2 | P a g e

3 | P a g e

Project Requirements

The requirements for the construction of a warehouse storage facility are outlined

below.

Fellowship Consulting will provide MUN Facilities Management with:

• A warehouse facility with the potential for expansion.

• Warehouse will include the need for occupancy on a semi-permanent basis.

o Possible number of occupancy 3-5 staff personnel.

• Warehouse facility must have include kitchen, lunch room and washroom

• Provide a minimum of three (3) designs for consideration.

o Two (2) designs (or more) will be estimated to Class D while the finalized

design will be estimated to Class A.

• Provide a detailed project schedule including design, construction, turnover and

commission of final design.

o Project plan and execution will preferably have one year time frame.

o Better option will be presented base on cost comparison and client needs.

• Provide tender documentation including final cost estimates and project

schedule, completed design and associated structural calculations with

referenced building codes.

Fellowship Consulting will provide Engineering 8700 with:

• A hard and soft copy of all documents issued to client in report form.

• A summary presentation of the work undertaken to complete this project and the

results achieved.

4 | P a g e

Methodology

Group Approach

• Meet with client (MUN Facilities Management) to determine fundamental need for project and project specific requirements.

• Retrieve all relevant information from the client regarding the project, including

but not limited to:

i) Geotechnical reports

ii) Existing site conditions

iii) Desired requirements

iv) Existing mechanical and electrical systems

• Schedule a visit to the project site on Mt. Scio with the client to get a clear

understanding of the site limitations and existing building that we must tie into.

• Develop a Project Plan to help highlight the main components of the design and

effectively achieve the desired outcome.

• With reference to the Project Plan, tasks will be divided based on the anticipated

amount of effort.

• Meet weekly/bi-weekly with the client and several times a week internally to

discuss any encountered issues.

Group Organization

Eider Hernandez

• Project Manager

• E.I.T

Stephen Reid

• Lead Structural Design

• E.I.T

Joshua Butler

• Senior Estimator

• E.I.T

Jamie Hookey

• Lead Geotechnical Design

• E.I.T

5 | P a g e

Client Interaction and Role

This project demands significant involvement of MUN Facilities Management and

as such, meetings will be necessary to assure project cohesion and a clear

understanding of deliverables. Meetings have been established on an initial weekly

basis; Thursdays at 4:00 PM, ENGI. 4019. To help achieve a smooth and successful

implementation, it will be the client's responsibility to:

1. Attend scheduled weekly meetings unless otherwise incapable. If unable to

attend meetings all efforts are to be made to provide written confirmation on non

attendance 24 hours in advance; meetings will be rescheduled to suit at time of

notification.

2. Provide best efforts to respond to all questions posed on behalf of Fellowship

Consulting within a timely manner. Fellowship Consulting feels a 48 hour period

response time will provide sufficient turnover. If 48 hours is seen to be inadequate at the

time of request, MUN Facilities Management will propose a timeframe to be agreed on

by both parties.

3. MUN Facilities Management is expected to work within the established system

of communication, i.e., Fellowship Consulting's provided contact information and

Dropbox file server created specifically for this project.

Design Principles

Fellowship Consulting will carry out a Class D estimate on multiple designs.

These estimates will be proposed to the client who will decide which design proposal to

proceed with.

Cost Estimating

Fellowship Consulting will provide a basic estimate for each design. Upon the

client's review of each individual design, one will be selected and a detailed estimate

including a thorough design will be conducted.

Desired Outcomes

Upon completion of the project, MUN Facilities Management will have access to a new storage facility that can be used to store any university records, equipment or other materials as necessary. The new building will provide adequate space for storage up to ten years as well as enabling the organization of existing archival records.

6 | P a g e

Fellowship Consulting ensures a strong working relationship and stand by our motto of Professional Design, Safe Construction, Thorough Inspection.

Reporting and Deliverables

Fellowship Consulting will maintain consistent communication with the client to ensure specific project requirements are met. Meeting minutes will be taken and distributed and an agenda for all scheduled meetings will be set a couple days in advance. Upon completion of the project, Fellowship Consulting will deliver the following:

• Multiple designs to Class D estimation • Finalized design to Class A estimation • Detailed project schedule including design, construction, turnover and

commission • Detailed calculations of structural design, earthworks, etc. • Final cost estimate

Delivered to Engineering 8700:

• A hard and soft copy of all documents issued to client in report form.

• A summary presentation of the work undertaken to complete this project

and the results achieved.

Troubleshooting

As unexpected problems occur Fellowship Consulting plan to discuss possible solutions internally. If issues still exist, discussion with the client or professors will be mandated as to avoid a possible disruption in schedule.

7 | P a g e

Primary Tasks

Note: Scheduled durations are estimated based on Fellowship Consulting's

previous experience with the completion of activities as listed below.

Site Assessment

i) Existing facilities to be evaluated on site in order to check compliance with

current National Building Codes (2010) & associated standards.

ii) As-built information required for exiting incinerator building & grounds.

Requirements

Site visit.

Hardcopy/Softcopy of site layout & facility drawings.

Duration: One (1) week.

Personnel

All

Site Access & Layout

i) Review existing site layout to determine best possible means of access

and egress during construction phase.

ii) Determine requirements for construction material laydown and access.

May include fencing.

Requirements

Site layout drawings.

Work area as defined by permit specifications.

Duration: Three (3) days.

Personnel

Jamie Hookey

8 | P a g e

Conceptual Design Phase

i) Review all documentation and provide design concepts based on client

needs.

iii) Model design concepts for client review.

Requirements

Site layout drawings.

Applicable software.

Duration: Ten (10) days.

Personnel

All

Structural System Requirements

i) Determine applicable loadings cases/scenarios based on most

recent National Building Code (NBC) and any applicable standards.

ii) Determine specific structural requirements of storage facility based on

client need.

iii) Limitations in design based on tie-in with existing structure to be

considered.

Requirements

National Building Code of Canada

Information from client on special requirements that may affect structural design

and integrity.

As-built of existing facility.

Duration: Five (5) days.

Personnel

Stephen Reid

9 | P a g e

Structural System Design & Modeling

i) Compile three (3) concept designs to be considered for construction.

ii) Determine available materials for construction.

iii) Present concept designs to client to for consideration and select final

design.

iv) Model final design using S-Frame and applicable loading.

v) Design final connection details.

Requirements

Applicable software.

Client meeting.

Standards for design and connection detailing.

Duration: Fourteen (14) days.

Personnel

All

Note: Items numbered 5 and 6 to be completed concurrently as

necessitated by design.

Geotechnical Work & Foundation Design

i) Review geotechnical report of existing soil conditions at site. Utilizing this

information assess drainage issues, bearing capacities, frost levels, etc.

ii) Based on structural loading, determine appropriate design choices for

foundation.

iii) Finalize design choice for foundation.

Requirements

Applicable software.

Geotechnical reports.

10 | P a g e

Duration: Ten (10) days.

Personnel

Jamie Hookey

Estimating & Scheduling

i) Provide design and construction cost estimates based on chosen final

design for construction. Final cost estimate will be Class A.

ii) Provide design and construction duration estimates based on chosen final

design for construction. Create construction schedule.

Requirements

Applicable software.

Client meeting.

Detailed drawings & contractor productivity estimate.

Duration: Ten (10) days.

Personnel

Joshua Butler

Tender Documentation & Presentation

i) Compile all information in a tender document.

Requirements

Client meeting.

Duration: Ten (10) days.

Personnel

Joshua Butler

11 | P a g e

Schedule

The following page details Fellowship Consulting's proposed schedule for completion of

this project as required by Engineering 8700.

IDT

ask N

am

e

1P

roje

ct

Kic

koff

2C

lien

t M

eeti

ng

15

Bro

chure

16

Info

rmation P

rocure

ment

17

Pro

ject

Pla

n P

roposal

18

Fee P

roposal fo

r C

lient

19

Sit

e A

ssessm

en

t

20

Dra

win

gs R

evi

ew

21

Site V

isit

22

Sit

e A

ccess &

Layo

ut

23

Dra

win

gs R

evi

ew

24

Pre

limin

ary

Sketc

hes

25

Co

ncep

tuali

ze D

esig

ns

26

Researc

h E

xisting F

acili

ties

27

Exp

ansio

n R

equirem

ents

28

Park

ing L

ayo

ut

29

Fin

aliz

e D

esig

n

30

Str

uctu

ral

Desig

n &

Mo

deli

ng

31

Loadin

g C

rite

ria

32

Mate

rial S

ele

ction

33

Fra

me A

naly

sis

34

Connetion D

eta

iling

35

Geo

tech

nic

al

Req

uir

em

en

ts &

Desig

n

36

Estim

ate

Requried E

xcava

tion

37

Estim

ate

Required F

ill

38

Foundation D

esig

n

39

Co

st

Esti

mate

& S

ch

ed

uli

ng

40

Mate

rials

Cost

Cla

ss A

41

Cost

Com

parisons f

or

Constr

uction P

lan

42

Dura

tion a

nd P

roje

ct

Schedule

43

Tender

Docum

enta

tion &

Pre

senta

tion

1/7

1/2

4

SM

TW

TF

SS

MT

WT

FS

SM

TW

TF

SS

MT

WT

FS

SM

TW

TF

SS

MT

WT

FS

SM

TW

TF

SS

MT

WT

FS

SM

TW

TF

SS

MT

WT

FS

SM

TW

TF

SS

MT

WT

FS

SM

TW

TF

Jan 6

, '1

3Jan 1

3,

'13

Jan 2

0,

'13

Jan 2

7,

'13

Feb 3

, '1

3F

eb 1

0,

'13

Feb 1

7,

'13

Feb 2

4,

'13

Mar

3,

'13

Mar

10,

'13

Mar

17,

'13

Mar

24,

'13

Mar

31,

'13

Task

Critical T

ask

Pro

gre

ss

Mile

sto

ne

Sum

mary

Rolle

d U

p T

ask

Rolle

d U

p C

ritical T

ask

Rolle

d U

p M

ilesto

ne

Rolle

d U

p P

rogre

ss

Split

Ext

ern

al T

asks

Pro

ject

Sum

mary

Gro

up B

y S

um

mary

Deadlin

e

Page 1

Pro

ject:

Pro

ject1

Date

: S

un 2

/3/1

3

12 | P a g e

Deliverables Upon the completion of this project MUN Facilities Management and Project Course 8700 will obtain.

• Tender documentation including final cost estimates and project schedule. Complete design and structural calculations with referenced building codes.

• Two additional design estimated to Class D.

Cost Fellowship Consulting project execution cost.

Expense Cost

Course tuition $ 1000.00

Site visits ($/visit) $ 200.00

Time resources 12.5hr/wk @ $75/hr. Estimated 12 weeks. $ 45,000.00

Printing $ 50.00

Software purchases $ 2000.00

Total $ 48,250.00

February 4th, 2013 Engineering 8700 S. Bruneau

13 | P a g e

Risks

Limitations

Software - Design, Cost, Experience & Access

Existing Structure Tie-in & Surrounding Facilities - Building Structure & Layout

Accessibility - During Design, Construction and Utilization

Knowledge & Experience - 1st Structural Design Project

Resources Available

Time Constraints - Class Conflicts, Weather Delays, Personal Schedules

References

Google Earth for Aerial Photo.

Retrieved: Google Maps - ©2013 Google

Group H - Fellowship Consulting Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John's, NL A1B 3X5 709.697.5846 ph fellowshipconsulting@gmail.com Fellowship Consulting Eider Hernandez Jamie Hookey Stephen Reid Joshua Butler Client - MUN Facilities Management Jason Daniels P. Eng. , M.A.Sc., P.M.P. jdaniels@mun.ca Scott Hill P.Eng. hills@mun.ca Instructor Stephen Bruneau B.Eng., M.E.Sc., PhD sbruneau@mun.ca

APPENDIX A SOQ

Fel

low

ship

C

on

su

ltin

g

Fe

llo

ws

hip

C

on

su

ltin

g

Fa

culty

of

En

gin

ee

rin

g &

Ap

plie

d S

cie

nce

Me

mo

ria

l Un

ive

rsity

of N

ew

fou

nd

lan

d

St.

Jo

hn

's,

NL

A1

B 3

X5

70

9.6

97

.58

46

ph

fello

wsh

ipco

nsu

ltin

g@

gm

ail.

com

Pro

fess

ion

al D

esi

gn

,

Sa

fe C

on

stru

ctio

n,

Th

oro

ug

h I

nsp

ect

ion

co

ns

ult

ing

de

sig

n

ma

inte

na

nc

e

su

pp

ort

CO

NS

UL

TIN

G

DE

SIG

N

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

SU

PP

OR

T

Mis

sio

n S

tate

men

t

Fo

cu

se

d o

n p

rovid

ing

qu

ali

ty w

ork

to

the

hig

he

st

sta

nd

ard

s i

n a

n e

ve

r

ch

an

gin

g e

ng

inee

rin

g f

ield

, w

e w

ill

co

ns

tan

tly s

triv

e t

o n

ot

on

ly a

dh

ere

to

cu

rre

nt

reg

ula

tio

ns

bu

t s

urp

as

s t

he

m

to a

ch

iev

e o

ur

vis

ion

. In

do

ing

th

is,

we

wil

l d

eli

ve

r o

pera

tio

na

l e

xce

lle

nce i

n

all

are

as

of

en

gin

eeri

ng

an

d m

ee

t o

r

ex

ce

ed

ou

r c

om

mit

me

nts

to

an

y a

nd

all

cli

en

ts w

e s

erv

e. It

is o

ur

mis

sio

n

to i

llu

str

ate

an

d i

mp

lem

en

t e

ffe

cti

ve

de

sig

n s

tra

teg

ies,

bo

th s

ho

rt a

nd

lo

ng

term

to

in

acc

ord

an

ce w

ith

Fe

llo

ws

hip

Co

ns

ult

ing

Co

re V

alu

es

; v

alu

es h

eld

by a

ll e

mp

loye

es

.

Co

mp

an

y P

rofi

le

Fe

llo

ws

hip

Co

ns

ult

ing

is

a t

ea

m o

f fo

ur

en

gin

ee

rin

g s

tud

en

ts s

pe

cia

lize

d i

n

ma

na

ge

me

nt

co

ns

ult

ing

. W

e p

rov

ide

un

riv

ale

d e

xp

ert

ise i

n t

he a

rea

s o

f

co

ns

tru

cti

on

ma

na

ge

me

nt

, e

nv

iro

nm

en

tal

en

gin

ee

rin

g,

mu

nic

ipa

l e

ng

inee

rin

g,

an

d

ge

ote

ch

nic

al

en

gin

eeri

ng

. O

ur

se

rvic

es

inc

lud

e p

roje

ct

ma

na

ge

me

nt,

es

tim

ati

ng

,

de

sig

n,

qu

ali

ty c

on

tro

l a

nd

qu

ali

ty

as

su

ran

ce

, s

ch

ed

uli

ng

, a

nd

op

tim

iza

tio

n

co

st.

EID

ER

HE

RN

AN

DE

Z

JO

SH

UA

BU

TL

ER

Ou

r F

ello

wsh

ip

BR

IDG

ING

TH

E G

AP

BE

TW

EE

N I

MA

GIN

AT

ION

& R

EA

LIT

Y

Eid

er

Hern

an

dez

is

a

curr

ent

Civ

il E

ngin

eeri

ng

stu

dent

in

the

Faculty

of

En

gin

eeri

ng

and

Applie

d

Scie

nce

at

Mem

ori

al

Univ

ers

ity

of

New

foun

dla

nd.

Work

ing

for

many

years

as

labo

ur

work

er

befo

re

sta

rtin

g h

is p

ost

secondary

ed

ucation i

n c

onstr

uction

sites d

eve

loped a

gre

at

passio

n f

or

Civ

il E

ngin

eeri

ng

pro

jects

. E

ider

has w

ork

ed e

xperi

ence i

n c

onsultin

g,

mari

ne i

ndustr

y, e

art

h a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

l a

nd h

ea

vy

constr

uct

ion in o

il sand p

roduction.

He h

as a

chie

ved a

sig

nific

ant

am

ount

of

know

ledg

e t

hat

will

build

up h

is

you

ng p

rofe

ssio

nal

care

er.

He h

as a

lso r

ecord

ed a

nd

com

ple

ted o

ne y

ear

of

pro

fessio

nal e

xperi

ence t

ow

ard

his

futu

re p

rofe

ssio

nal engin

eeri

ng r

ecognitio

n.

Ste

ph

en

Reid

is a

civ

il e

ngin

eeri

ng s

tude

nt

stu

dyi

ng

at

Mem

ori

al U

niv

ers

ity

of

New

foundla

nd.

He b

eg

an

his

post-

secondary

stu

die

s i

mm

edia

tely

up

on g

raduatin

g

from

Queen E

liza

beth

Regio

nal

Hig

h S

chool

in 2

006.

The

co-o

pera

tive

education a

t M

UN

has a

llow

ed h

im

to

com

bin

e

his

th

eore

tical

know

ledge

w

ith

valu

able

work

exp

eri

ence.

Mr.

R

eid

ha

s

com

ple

ted

six

fo

ur

month

inte

rnship

s t

o d

ate

wh

ere

he h

as g

ain

ed a

gre

at

und

ers

tandin

g

of

the

fun

dam

enta

ls

of

heavy

civ

il

constr

uct

ion.

He h

as e

xperi

ence

d c

lient

and c

ontr

acto

r

pro

ject

managem

ent,

re

searc

h and d

evelo

pm

ent

as

well

as te

mpora

ry str

uctu

ral

desig

n.

Movi

ng fo

rward

Ste

ph

en

inte

nds

to

take

the

last

year

of

his

und

erg

radu

ate

stu

die

s t

o m

ake

a c

are

er

decis

ion t

hat

satisf

ies h

is inte

rests

and s

uits

his

life

styl

e.

en

gin

eere

d s

olu

tio

ns f

or

y

ou

r eve

ry n

eed

ST

EP

HE

N R

EID

JA

MIE

HO

OK

EY

Jo

sh

ua

Bu

tler

is

an

engin

ee

ring

stu

dent

with

the

Faculty

of

Engin

eeri

ng a

nd A

pplie

d S

cie

nce m

ajo

ring

in

civ

il stu

die

s.

Havi

ng

gra

duate

d

from

Q

ueen

Eliz

abeth

R

egio

nal

Hig

h

Sch

ool

with

hon

ors

and

advanced

pla

cem

ent,

M

r.

Butler

now

seeks

to

com

ple

te h

is b

ach

elo

r’s d

egre

e f

or

the y

ear

201

3.

A

contr

ibuting m

em

ber

of

the C

an

adia

n S

ocie

ty f

or

Civ

il

Engin

eeri

ng,

he a

lso r

epre

sents

his

gra

duating c

lass in

addre

ssin

g t

he M

em

ori

al

faculty.

Com

ple

ting s

ix w

ork

term

s t

o d

ate

, he h

as b

een a

ctive

in t

he e

ngin

eeri

ng

work

fo

rce

pro

vidin

g

serv

ices

such

as

pro

ject

mana

gem

ent,

desig

n a

nd q

ualit

y assura

nce.

This

has

serv

ed t

o s

park

inte

rest

in h

ea

vy c

onstr

uction w

here

he h

opes t

o o

bta

in a

care

er

post

gra

duation.

Jam

ie H

oo

ke

y is a

Term

8 C

ivil

Engin

eeri

ng s

tudent

at

Mem

ori

al

Univ

ers

ity

of

New

foun

dla

nd

and

is

active

ly p

urs

uin

g a

care

er

within

the t

ransport

ation

engin

eeri

ng i

ndustr

y.

Jam

ie w

ork

s a

s an a

ssis

tant

Pro

ject

Mana

ger

for

Al-

terr

a E

ngin

eeri

ng L

td l

ocate

d

in

Red

Deer

Alb

ert

a.

Havi

ng

work

ed

in

the

constr

uct

ion

industr

y fo

r te

n

years

Jam

ie

is

will

round

ed

with

exp

eri

ence

in

clu

din

g

bla

sting,

subdiv

isio

n

desig

n,

constr

uction

mana

gem

ent,

build

ing

layout,

surv

eyi

ng

and

dra

ftin

g.

T

hro

ugh

exp

eri

ence

and

education

Jam

ie

has

becom

e

pro

ficie

nt

with

the

desig

n,

cost

estim

ating

and

constr

uct

ion

mana

gem

ent

pro

cess

for

road

constr

uct

ion p

roje

cts

.

PR

OJ

EC

T I

NV

OL

VE

ME

NT

•

Alb

ian S

ands T

aili

ngs C

om

ple

tio

n

•

Auro

ra M

ine R

elo

cation

•

Calg

ary

Air

port

Co

nstr

uctio

n M

anag

em

ent

•

Easte

rn H

ea

lth I

nfr

astr

uctu

re D

ivis

ion

•

Eliz

abeth

Avenu

e W

ate

r and S

ew

er

Up

gra

des

•

Hebro

n O

il P

latf

orm

Mate

rials

Testin

g

•

Hig

hw

ay

11

A a

nd H

igh

wa

y 2 Inte

rchang

e

Reconstr

uction -

Re

d D

eer,

Alb

ert

a

•

Hig

hw

ay

42

Constr

uction

- N

ort

hern

Alb

ert

a

•

Hig

hw

ay

60

Reco

nstr

uctio

n -

Alg

on

quin

Park

,

Onta

rio

•

Jack

Pin

e M

ine K

ahah

ago C

reek D

ivers

ion

•

Long

Harb

our

Pro

cessin

g P

lant T

em

pora

ry

Str

uctu

res D

esig

n a

nd S

tru

ctu

ral P

ackagin

g

•

Tra

ns-L

abra

dor

Hig

hw

ay

Upgra

din

g a

nd P

avin

g

•

TR

-NM

SP

W S

yncru

de M

ine

•

West Lake S

ubd

ivis

ion D

evelo

pm

ent P

hases I-I

V

- R

ed D

eer,

Alb

ert

a

•

Wusk

watim

Hyd

ro G

enera

tion S

tation M

ain

Dam

Constr

uctio

n

.