modelsofcommunication-phpapp02

8/18/2019 modelsofcommunication-phpapp02

1/20

MODELS OF COMMUNICATION

Anne Francis B. Villegas

Fatima Trisha P. Velasco

BSND!


2/20

DEFINITION

re"ers to the conce$t%al mo&el%se& to e'$lain the

h%man comm%nication $rocess.


3/20

TRANSMISSION MODEL OR

STANDARD VIEW OFCOMMUNICATION, 1949 (rst ma)or mo&el "or comm%nication

Cla%&e Shannon an& *arren *ea+er ‘linear model of communication’


4/20

ReceiverSend

er

channel


5/20

ST,EN-TS ELEMENTS

Si!lici"#

$enerali"#

%&an"i'a(ili"#)

In+ra"in

-&rce Tran-i""er Channel

Receiver De-"ina"in


6/20

T.REE LEVELS OF /RO0LEMS FORCOMMUNICATION

The "echnical !r(le ho/

acc%ratel0 can the message 1etransmitte&2

The -ean"ic !r(le3 ho/ $recisel0is the meaning 4con+e0e&42

The e2ec"ivene-- !r(le ho/

e5ecti+el0 &oes the recei+e& meaning


7/20

DANIEL C.ANDLER CRITI%UES T.ETRANSMISSION MODEL 03 STATIN$

It ass%mes comm%nicators are isolate&in&i+i&%als.

No allo/ance "or &i5ering $%r$oses. No allo/ance "or &i5ering

inter$retations. No allo/ance "or %ne6%al $o/er

relations. No allo/ance "or sit%ational conte'ts


8/20

SENDERMESSA$EC.ANNELRECEIVER MODEL OF

COMMUNICATION, 1956 SMC, Mo&el o" Comm%nication

Da+i& Berlo se$arate& the mo&el into clear $arts

an& has 1een e'$an&e& %$on 10 otherscholars.


9/20


10/20

MA7OR DIMENSIONS

Message

so%rce 7emisor7sen&er 7 enco&er Form

Channel &estination 7 recei+er 7

target 7 &eco&er


11/20

*e sho%l& e'amine the IMPACT that themessage has 81oth &esire& an&%n&esire&9 on the target o" the

message. 8*il1%r Schram:;9


12/20

T.REE LEVELS OF SEMIOTIC RULES

S0ntactic Pragmatic Semantic


13/20

TRANSACTIONAL MODEL OF COMMUNICATION,866:;

Barnl%n&

In&i+i&%als are sim%ltaneo%sl0engaging in the sen&ing an& recei+ingo" messages


14/20


15/20

CONSTITUTIVE MODEL OR CONSTRUCTIONISTVIEW

Secon& attit%&e o" comm%nication Foc%ses on ho/ an in&i+i&%al

comm%nicates as the &etermining"actor o" the /a0 the message /ill 1einter$rete&

Comm%nication is +ie/e& as a cnd&i"


16/20

SPEECH ACT

an act that a s$ea?er $er"orms /henma?ing an %tterance: incl%&ing the"ollo/ing3

A general act 8illc&"inar# ac"9 thata s$ea?er $er"orms: anal0@a1le asincl%&ing the %ttering o" /or&s 8&""erance ac"-9 ma?ing re"erence an& $re&icating 8!r!-i"inal

ac"-9: an& a $artic%lar intention in ma?ing the %tterance

8illc&"inar# +rce9


17/20

An act in+ol+e& in the illoc%tionar0 act:incl%&ing %tterance acts an& $ro$ositionalacts

The $ro&%ction o" a $artic%lar e5ect in thea&&ressee 8!erlc&"inar# ac"9


18/20

ENCODETRANSMITRECEIVEDECODE MODEL

$rocesses o" enco&ing an& &eco&ingim$l0 that the sen&er an& recei+ereach $ossess something that "%nctions

as a co&e1oo?: an& that these t/o co&e1oo?s are: at the +er0 least: similar i"not i&entical. Altho%gh something li?e

co&e 1oo?s is im$lie& 10 the mo&el:the0 are no/here re$resente& in themo&el: /hich creates man0 conce$t%al

&ic%lties.


19/20

T.EORIES OF CORE$ULATION

Comm%nication is creati+e an&&0namic contin%o%s $rocess: ratherthan a &iscrete e'change o" in"ormation

Peo$le %se &i5erent t0$es o" me&ia tocomm%nicate an& /hich one the0

choose to %se /ill o5er &i5erent$ossi1ilities "or the sha$e an&&%ra1ilit0 o" societ0.


20/20

PSCOLO- OFCOMMUNICATION Bernar& L%s?in: UCLA: ;G Tas? Force re$ort

on $s0cholog0 an& ne/ technologiescom1ine& me&ia an& comm%nication as$ict%res: gra$hics an& so%n&increasingl0 &ominate mo&ern

comm%nication

Documents

modelsofcommunication-phpapp02