Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Modelling of mixed electrolytes for hybrid metal-ion batteries
Hristo Rasheeva,b *, Radostina Stoyanovab and Alia Tadjera,b
a Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sofia, Sofia 1164, Bulgariab Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
* Email: [email protected]
2+
++
2+
mailto:[email protected]
The rationalisation of the interactions of electrolyte components and solvent molecules in the charge-discharge process is a
challenging task for any type of battery but this information is critical for the design of hybrid batteries combining the advantages
of different charge carriers. The molecular modelling allows deeper insight into this problem. Particularly in the case of light-metal-
ion batteries, the metal ions change continuously their solvation status, gradually acquiring solvation shell upon leaving one
electrode and shedding it off before intercalating in the other electrode. All these stages can be simulated and characterised by
means of various molecular descriptors using different theoretical methods.
Here, the free energy of homo- and hetero-binuclear clusters with increasing/decreasing number of explicit solvent
molecules in the gas phase and in implicit solvent is assessed quantum-chemically and juxtaposed to the mononuclear
alternatives. The cations considered are Li+, Na+, and Mg2+ and the solvent is ethylene carbonate (EC). The issues addressed are:
a) the preferred coordination number of the metal ions in the presence of a companion-cation; b) the charge transfer between
metal ions and solvation shell; c) the competition for solvent between the cations in batteries utilizing a dual-cation electrolyte.
The obtained findings provide insight into certain unexplained experimental results such as the enhanced performance of hybrid-
ion batteries compared to single ion ones.
• Gaussian 09
• B3LYP/6-31G**
• Implicit solvent model: SMD
• Charges - NBOCo
mp
uta
tio
nal
:A
bst
ract
Co
mp
on
ents
: Mep+Mq+(EC)1-10Me
p+(EC)1-8
Cation pairs
Li+
PF6-
Na+
Mg2+
Solvent:
Ethylene carbonate (EC)
Single cation
homo-nuclear hetero-nuclear
Counterion
(Simplified representation)
Cation pairs
Single cationhomo-nuclear hetero-nuclear
Initial geometries
vacuum
&
solvent
Models
*Green spheres – generic cations; Red spheres – carbonyl oxygens of ECs
Mep+Mq+(EC)1-10
Mep+(EC)1-8
Na+ coordinates two oxygens
Lower symmetry of the complexes for n>3
Confirmed coordination numbers:
Li+ - 4; Mg2+ - 6; Na+ - 5-6
as established in the literature
Cation–O distances depend on the partner
Cation–cation distances
Distances Cation-EC
Results – Structural
*
Cation–cation distances depend more
on the number of shared solvent
molecules then on the coordination
number or total number of ECs.
2 4 6 8-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
G
bi -
G
mo
no, kca
l/m
ol
n
Li+Li
+ Na
+Na
+ Mg
2+Mg
2+
Li+Na
+ Li
+Mg
2+ Na
+Mg
2+
Bi-
nucl
ear
pre
ferr
ed
Mo
no
-nucl
ear
pre
ferr
ed
At low degree of solvation, hetero-binuclear clusters, particularly the
Mg2+-containing ones, are preferred to these of single ions.
𝛥𝐺𝑏𝑖 − ∆𝐺𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑜 = 𝐺(M𝑎𝑝+M𝑏𝑞+
EC n) − 𝐺 M𝑎𝑝+(𝐸𝐶)𝑛
2− 𝐺 M𝑏
𝑞+(𝐸𝐶)𝑛
2
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
G
, kcal/m
ol
n'
Li+Li
+
Na+Na
+
Mg2+
Mg2+
Li+Na
+
Li+Mg
2+
Na+Mg
2+
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
G
, kca
l/m
ol
n'
Li+Li
+
Na+Na
+
Mg2+
Mg2+
Li+Na
+
Li+Mg
2+
Na+Mg
2+
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
G
, kca
l/m
ol
n
Li+Li
+
Na+Na
+
Mg2+
Mg2+
Li+Na
+
Li+Mg
2+
Na+Mg
2+
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
G
, kca
l/m
ol
n
Li_Li
Na_Na
Mg_Mg
Li_Na
Li_Mg
Na_Mg
The curve profile of the mixed cation-pairs is closer to the profile
of the homo-cation pair with higher charge density.
Solvation
Stepwise desolvation
M𝑎𝑝+
+ M𝑏𝑞+
+ 𝑛EC → M𝑎𝑝+M𝑏𝑞+
EC n
M𝑎𝑝+M𝑏𝑞+
EC n → M𝑎𝑝+M𝑏𝑞+
EC n−1 + EC
In vacuum the profile of the curves is monotonous while in solvent two
stages can be discerned, related to the cation coordination number.
𝛥𝐺𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑣 = 𝐺(M𝑎𝑝+M𝑏𝑞+
EC n) − 𝐺(M𝑎𝑝+) − 𝐺 M𝑏
𝑞+− 𝑛𝐺(EC)
𝛥𝐺𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑣 = 𝐺[M𝑎𝑝+M𝑏𝑞+
EC n−1] + 𝐺(𝐸𝐶) − 𝐺[M𝑎𝑝+M𝑏𝑞+
EC n]
*
*
Results – Energetics
Solvation:
Desolvation:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Ch
arg
e
n
Li
Na
MgLi
a) b) c)
BGDN09/13/16.12.2016
D01-214/28.11.2018
Funding:
Results – Charges
Summary
In Mep+Meq+(EC)n: the charge of a
cation decreases with n only if thecoordination number grows (e.g. (a) and
(b)); for same coordination – same charge,
irrespective of the partner (e.g. (a) and (c)).
• At moderate level of solvation, mixed bi-nuclear complexes are preferred.
• EC appears to be an operable solvent for mixed Mg-containing electrolytes.
• The coupling of Li+ or Na+ in with Mg2+ permits easier desolvation of the
ions compared to mononuclear Li+, Na+ and Mg2+ complexes.
Medium polarity is of minor importance.
In Mep+(EC)n: the charge of the cation decreases with nuntil the first shell is formed and stays constant thereafter.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
Ch
arg
e lo
ss
n
Li+
Na+
Mg2+
PF6
-