Miscible Displacement Processes

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

paper about miscible displacement processes

Citation preview

  • MISCIBLE DISPLACEMENT

    PROCESSES

    TM-6012

    ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY

  • OUTLINE

    Introduction

    General Description

    Principle of Phase Behavior

    First-Contact Miscible Process

    Multiple Contact Miscible Process

    Fluid Properties

    Factors Affecting Displacement Efficiency Of Miscible Process

  • INTRODUCTION

    Definition

    Processes where the effectiveness of

    the displacement results primarily from

    miscibility between the oil in place and

    the injected fluid

    Displacement processes:

    First-Contact Miscible (FCM)

    Multiple-Contact Miscible (MCM)

  • PRINCIPLES OF PHASE BEHAVIOR

    Pressure/ Temperature Diagrams

  • PRINCIPLES OF PHASE BEHAVIOR

    Pressure/ Composition Diagram Illustrating

    Isothermal Compression

  • PRINCIPLES OF PHASE BEHAVIOR

    Pressure/ Composition Diagram Illustrating Isothermal Compression

  • FIRST CONTACT MISCIBLE

    PROCESS

    FCM process normally consists of injecting a relatively small primary slug that is miscible

    with the crude oil, followed by injection of a

    larger, less expensive secondary slug

    Ideally, the secondary slug should be miscible with the primary slug. In contrary,

    then a residual saturation of the primary slug

    material will be trapped in the displacement

    process

  • FIRST CONTACT MISCIBLE PROCESS

  • FIRST CONTACT MISCIBLE PROCESS

    A basic concern in the design of a process is the phase behavior between the primary slug and the

    crude oil and between the primary slug and the

    secondary slug fluid that displaces the primary slug

    When the reservoir temperature is above the critical temperature of the primary-slug solvent, the

    pressure required for complete miscibility between

    the slug solvent and the reservoir oil becomes more

    difficult to estimate

    Under these conditions, the solvent cannot be liquefied and pressure must be above the

    cricondenbar

  • MULTIPLE CONTACT MISCIBLE

    PROCESS

    The condition of miscibility is generated in the reservoir through in-situ composition

    changes resulting from multiple contacts and

    mass transfer between reservoir oil and

    injected fluid

    MCM processes are classified as vaporizing-gas (lean-gas) displacement, condensing and

    condensing/vaporizing-gas (enriched-gas)

    displacements, and CO2 displacements.

  • MULTIPLE CONTACT MISCIBLE PROCESS

    Vaporizing-gas process

    The injected fluid is generally a relatively lean gas ( it contains mostly methane and

    other low molecular-weight hydrocarbons)

    The composition of the injected gas is modified as it moves through the reservoir

    so that it becomes miscible with the original

    reservoir oil.

  • MULTIPLE CONTACT MISCIBLE PROCESS

    Development of

    miscibility

    Miscibility does not

    develop

  • MULTIPLE CONTACT MISCIBLE PROCESS

    Condensing and Condensing/Vaporizing-Gas

    (Enriched-Gas) Displacement Process

    The injected fluid contains significant amounts of intermediate components (C2

    through C6) rather than being a dry gas.

    The process depends on the condensation of these components into the reservoir oil,

    thereby modifying the oil composition

    The modified oil then becomes miscible with the injected fluid

  • FLUID PROPERTIES

    The performance of a miscible displacement process depends on fluid physical properties that affect flow behavior in a reservoir

    The properties influence the performance are:

    Fluid Density

    Fluid Viscosity

  • FLUID PROPERTIES

    Fluid Density

    Knowledge of the relative densities of the fluids and fluid mixture is important for the process design

    The result in displacement process can be gravity override, underride, or fingering

    Fluid Viscosity

    Mobility ratio in a displacement process is a direct function of the viscosities and relative permeabilities of displaced and displacing fluids

  • FACTORS AFFECTING DISPLACEMENT

    EFFICIENCY OF MISCIBLE PROCESS

    Displacement Efficiency in a miscible process is less than 100%

    The magnitudes of the efficiencies depend on a number of factors, including whether a displacement

    is conducted as a secondary or tertiary process

    In Secondary recovery, it is assumed that there is no mobile water unless water is injected as a part of the

    process

    In Tertiary recovery, both oil and water will be displaced and will be mobile

  • FACTORS AFFECTING DISPLACEMENT

    EFFICIENCY OF MISCIBLE PROCESS

    Microscopic Displacement Efficiency (No Mobile Water)

    The Interfacial Tension (IFT) between displacing (solvent) and displaced (oil) phases. If IFT is zero, then residual saturation in portions of the rock contacted by the displacing phase would be essentially zero

    Dispersion and mixing at the microscopic level, combined with the associated phase behavior, are the major reasons that microscopic displacement efficiencies in MCM process in the absence of water are not 100%

    Efficiency typically ranges from 90% to 97%

  • FACTORS AFFECTING DISPLACEMENT

    EFFICIENCY OF MISCIBLE PROCESS

    Macroscopic Displacement Efficiency

    (No Mobile Water)

    Four major factors affect recovery efficiency at

    the macroscopic level in a miscible process

    Mobility ratio

    Viscous fingering

    Gravity segregation

    Reservoir heterogeneity

  • FACTORS AFFECTING DISPLACEMENT

    EFFICIENCY OF MISCIBLE PROCESS

    Effect of Mobility Ratio

    The viscosity of miscible solvents are typically small (

  • FACTORS AFFECTING DISPLACEMENT

    EFFICIENCY OF MISCIBLE PROCESS

    Effect of Viscous Fingering

    An adverse viscosity ratio in a miscible process results in viscous fingering, which

    leads to reduced volumetric sweep

    Effective viscosity ratio, E, that characterizes the effect of viscous fingering:

  • FACTORS AFFECTING DISPLACEMENT

    EFFICIENCY OF MISCIBLE PROCESS

    In the FCM process, the oil recovery was delayed because of the adverse mobility ratio

    (early breakthrough of injecting fluid)The

    ultimate recovery approached 100%

    In the MCM process, the recovery leveled off, the final recovery would not approach 100%.

    The viscous fingering not only delay the oil

    recovery but also reduce total recovery.

  • FACTORS AFFECTING DISPLACEMENT

    EFFICIENCY OF MISCIBLE PROCESS

    Effect of Gravity

    A dimensionless group used to characterize

    gravity effects is the viscous/gravity ratio, Rv/g

  • FACTORS AFFECTING DISPLACEMENT

    EFFICIENCY OF MISCIBLE PROCESS

    Vertical sweep efficiency

    at breakthrough as a

    function of the ratios of

    viscous/gravity forces,

    linear system

  • FACTORS AFFECTING DISPLACEMENT

    EFFICIENCY OF MISCIBLE PROCESS

    Displacement Efficiency When Mobile Water is Present

    The presence of a water phase, flowing or stagnant, has no significant effect on phase behavior in either an FCM process or an MCM process

    Miscibility is developed in basically the same manner whether water is present or not

    The presence of flowing water has relatively small negative effect on displacement efficiency, but it blocks part of the oil away from the solvent, so it reduce the ability of the solvent to contact and mobilize the oil

    It both occurs in FCM and MCM processes