MINUTES - Amazon Web Servicesmedia.flysfo.com.s3.amazonaws.com/media/sfo/about-sfo/...itemor this agenda item, Dan Deaton. Danis a partner in the public finance group at Nixon PeabodyLLP,

SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION

MINUTES Tuesday November 6 2018

900 AM

Room 400 ‐ City Hall 1 Dr Carlton B Goodlett Place

(400 Van Ness Avenue) City and County of San Francisco

LONDON N BREED MAYOR

COMMISSIONERS LARRY MAZZOLA

President LINDA S CRAYTON

Vice President ELEANOR JOHNS

RICHARD J GUGGENHIME PETER A STERN

IVAR C SATERO Airport Director

C CORINA MONZOacuteN Commission Secretary

SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94128

Minutes of the Airport Commission Meeting of Tuesday November 6 2018

CALENDAR SECTION

AGENDA ITEM

TITLE RESOLUTION NUMBER

A CALL TO ORDER 4

B ROLL CALL4

C ADOPTION OF MINUTES 4

No 18‐0355 Regular meeting of October 16 20184

D SPECIAL ITEMS 4

1 Airport Disclosure Policies and Procedures Training 4

E ITEMS INITIATED BY COMMISSIONERS 9

F ACTION ITEMS RELATING TO ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS amp MAINTENANCE 10

2 Award Contract No 1121151 for Shared Use Passenger Processing System Support Services SITA Information Networking Computing USA Inc $9966543 10

3 Approval of a Trial Program with Briggo Inc for Installation and Operation of Robotic Espresso Vending Machines 14

4 Approval of Phase D (Establish Final Guaranteed Maximum Price) to Contract No 1051176 Design‐Build Services for the Airport Security Infrastructure Program Hunt Construction Group Inc $11194143 17

No 18‐0356 17

5 Approval of Phase D (Establish Final Guaranteed Maximum Price) to Contract No 903466 Design‐Build Services for the Demolition of Terminal 2 Air Traffic Control Tower Project Turner Construction Company $4484042 19

No 18‐0357 19

6 Approval of Phase D (Establish Final Guaranteed Maximum Price) to Contract No 8427C66 Design‐Build Services for the Mel Leong Treatment Plant Industrial Wastewater and Recycled Water Upgrades Project Walsh Construction Company II LLC $334724220

No 18‐0358 20

Minutes November 6 2018 Page 2

7 Approval of Phase C1 to Contract No 1100166 Design‐Build Services for the Wayfinding Enhancement Program Fisher Development Inc $2963258 21

No 18‐0359 21

G CONSENT CALENDAR OF ROUTINE ADMINISTATIVE MATTERS22

8 Modification No 1 to Lease No GS‐09P‐LCA03395 with the United States of America to Extend the Term and Increase the Annual Rent for Offices Occupied by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation $615385 22

No 18‐0360 22

9 Approval of Modification No 4 to Professional Services Contract No 1100141 Project Management Support Services for the Wayfinding Enhancement Program SFO Partners a Joint‐Venture of ASL and AGS Inc $240000022

No 18‐0361 22

10 Approval of Modification No 2 to Professional Services Contract No 8465C41 Project Management Support Services for the Superbay Hangar Fire Protection System Replacement Project C M Pros $634130 23

No 18‐0362 23

11 Approval of Modification No 8 to Professional Services Contract No 927341 Project Management Support Services for the Long Term Parking Garage No 2 Project The Allen Group LLC Cooper Pugeda Management Inc A Joint Venture $40000023

No 18‐0363 23

12 Award Contract No 11065 9‐1‐1 System Replacement Services ATampT California $1300000 23

No 18‐0364 23

H NEW BUSINESS 24

I CORRESPONDENCE 30

J CLOSED SESSION 30

K ADJOURNMENT 31

A CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Airport Commission was called to order at 900 AM in Room 400 City Hall San Francisco CA

B ROLL CALL Present Hon Larry Mazzola President

Hon Linda S Crayton Vice President Hon Eleanor Johns

Absent Hon Richard J Guggenhime Hon Peter A Stern

C ADOPTION OF MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting of October 16 2018 were adopted unanimously upon a motion by Commissioner Crayton and a second by Commissioner Johns

D SPECIAL ITEMS 1 Airport Disclosure Policies and Procedures Training

Discussion only

The Commissionrsquos Disclosure Policies and Procedures provides training for Commissioners once every two years to assist them in understanding their responsibilities with respect to official statements and other disclosure documents

Good morning Commissioners my name is Brooke Abola and Irsquom a Deputy City Attorney on the Airport team Im here this morning to introduce the presenter for the next agenda item or this agenda item Dan Deaton Dan is a partner in the public finance group at Nixon Peabody LLP and outside disclosure counsel to the Airport and he will lead you through todayrsquos disclosure training As background in 2014 the Commission first adopted Disclosure Policies and Procedures and they were updated in 2017 The disclosure policy requires that all the people who play a role in preparing or authorizing investor disclosures

receive training every two years so they understand how best to carry out their responsibilities Airport Staff and Commissioners were both trained in the Spring and Summer of 2017 Todayrsquos training is intended as a supplement and a refresher to the full training provided last year in response to a request from Commissioner Crayton at the October 2nd meeting Just a little more about Dan He has extensive experience advising on disclosure‐related issues in public finance and works with numerous governmental bond issuers Nixon Peabody has been the Airports disclosure counsel since 2010 and Dan has been directly involved on the team that entire time The Airport Staff and Dans teams efforts were recognized for excellence in disclosure by the National Federation of Municipal Analysts an investor trade organization in 2016 Hes here today to review with you your obligations as Commissioners under the federal securities laws when you authorize Airport bonds and review the Airports disclosure documents He will present for about 5 or 10 minutes and then you will have an opportunity to ask him questions at the end And now I would like to welcome Dan Deaton to present the training

Mr Dan Deaton said good morning The purpose of today is just to provide a quick refresher training to what we provided last year and just provide three topics we wanted to discuss this morning Just first an overview a real snapshot of what issuers of municipal securities are required to do under the federal securities laws in connection with bond disclosures Second to give a sense of what the Airport Staff has been doing in order to keep in line with these requirements Third talk about what are responsibilities of the Commissioners themselves in connection with those bond disclosures

So letrsquos just turn really quickly to a snapshot of what issuers required to do to comply with the federal securities laws when issuing bonds And this is actually very simple It really comes down to two elements It comes down to process and substance The FCC the United States Securities Exchange Commission has had a heighten scrutiny within our marketplace for the last five to six years and in that time wersquove learned a lot about what it is that issuers and municipal securities are supposed to be doing And the FCC has focused on several key aspects of what really constitutes a reasonable process of issuers And wersquove laid them out there on the slide which is connecting silos Making sure all of the information and perspectives of the issuer are taken into consideration in the disclosure making sure a core group of people who are responsible for the disclosure review the disclosure and talk about the disclosure making sure that therersquos a sufficient amount of a documentation about the processes that have been followed and making sure that therersquos training of the various individuals who are involved so they understand what it is theyrsquore supposed to do

So the first element really is making sure that the issuer has a reasonable systematic process Second is substance and what we like to do is talk about it like as telling the credit story And the reason why we like to talk about it in this regard is because investors are just one of many different stakeholders with municipalities And there really are three elements to what telling the credit story providing the substance in the disclosure that the FCC expects First is disclosure is always a big picture exercise Itrsquos not a small picture

exercise 1) Itrsquos about making sure that the big picture facts and circumstances risks and other terms are disclosed to the investor 2) It requires an unvarnished disclosure of good and bad news And then finally itrsquos about telling it to the perspective of the investor Investors donrsquot look at the credit of a do not look at the financial and operating condition of an issuer the same way that other stakeholders do And so to communicating that to investors in a way that they can understand and in order to make a good investment decision So thatrsquos a snapshot of what issuers are required to do under the Federal Securities laws So lets move on now to the to the discussion of what the Airport Staff has been doing in order to comply with these requirements First the Airport has the Airport Staff presented to you and the Commission adopted the Disclosure Policies and Procedures in 2014 and the Airport Staff has complied with those ever since and have updated them once in 2017 And we periodically review them from time to time as well And the policies and procedures track exactly what it is that the FCC has been asking to do In developing the Disclosure Policies and Procedures we identified all the various places where information could reside within the Airport and make sure those individuals are appropriately involved in the process The policies and procedures created disclosure working group that takes ownership and responsibility over the disclosure process as well as making sure that they review and discuss the disclosure before offerings are made Third theres the creation of a Disclosure Coordinator who has the responsibility of making sure that the checks are being checked off and that the policies and procedures and also makes sure the deal files are being maintained to provide the documentation that the FCC would expect And then also it requires periodic training of both the Commission and the Staff which wersquove conducted now multiple times since 2014 So first theres been a very very heavy emphasis among the Airport Staff to evaluate maintain and comply with good reasonable systematic process Second the Airport has ever since I have been involved in for long before I came on onboard Im sure been very focused on making sure that the whole credit story in the Airportrsquos disclosure documents is told We do that in number of different ways but I want to highlight three specific ways that I think are helpful for people to know because I think its really demonstrates the strengths of the Airportrsquos disclosure practices First the Airports disclosure working group every member of that working group reviews the disclosure and before any offering we have a conference call or a meeting to discuss the contents of that and thats a big picture conversation to make sure that the big picture of the Airportrsquos condition and the offering is being told appropriately Second the Airport conducts multiple drafting sessions in which a broader working group including Underwriters Underwriters Counsels and others are able to ask questions provide input and their and their and their and their comments as well to make sure that its factoring that in And then finally the Airport conducts senior management due diligence sessions in which the senior management comes in for about a half an hour and members of the broader working group is able to ask questions and learn about the information and perspectives that the senior managers have about the about the Airportrsquos financial and operating condition And so the the disclosure process has always been a very big picture process that we that the Airport Staff maintains from offering to offering So thats sort of in a nutshell of what the Airport Staff has been doing in order to keeping track of what the federal securities laws require from issuers So finally

what we wanted to do is just talk about the individual Commissioners themselves and what are your responsibilities in connection with the disclosure process And as weve just described before in past trainings that really comes down to two elements First is we do believe the FCC would expect or Commissioners to have a reasonable delegation of the disclosure process to Staff And thats why we constantly want to tell you about what are the policies and procedures in the process that the Airport Staff takes and make sure that the Disclosure Policies and Procedures are submitted to you for your approval So that you have a reasonable basis that the staff is actually following a reasonable process with reasonable trained individuals But I think the most important one is the second point which is that the airport commissioners are themselves part of the airports policies and procedures the airport staff needs your unique knowledge and perspective of the facts and circumstances at the airport in order to make sure that those are factored into the disclosure An example of this has come up in the last year that really illustrates the importance of this We represent a utility back east and not that dissimilar It was a department of the city the city and a board member a set of board members were actually having active ongoing conversations with the Mayor of the city about the potential privatization of the utility And none of the members of the Staff had any idea that those conversations were going on Thats a good example of some unique facts is that unique knowledge or perspective that can reside at a board level that the Airport that the Airport staff would never know And so part of what we want to do with the perspective each offering is make sure that you are appropriately involved so that if you have unique facts a perspective or other information that would be valuable that that could be factored in But the responsibilities that the Commissioners is not to prepare the disclosure Thats what Staff does with us Its not to read the document its not to take those other steps Thats what the working groups are for But we do need to get the benefit of your unique knowledge and perspective of what that may be at the time Thats thats in a nutshell what we wanted to provide I think we open up for questions now

Commissioner Mazzola said well thank you for your presentation and asked any questions

Commissioner Crayton said my question is And first of all thank you and of course to the Staff at the Airport So my question is in terms of the policies and procedures right now and of course we have to review them and each time there is a change I believe that everything is always brought to the Commission So I donrsquot perceive an elephant in the room per say but in terms of the breakdown of getting down to the nitty gritty of the detail Thatrsquos my concern in terms of my expertise in this particular area and wherersquos does my responsibility lie in that particular area in terms of my ability to do a deep dive

Mr Deaton said so the one of the things to keep in mind is that issuers of municipal securities are not strictly liable for their disclosure Okay the standard that applies to issuers of municipals securities is always the strictest it gets is negligence Okay and so what we thats why we focused is very heavily at all levels on process and having a reasonable process And so one of the things that weve tried to focus in terms of the Commission since 2014 is to make sure that you all can be able to establish that you have

conducted yourself in a reasonable reasonable fashion And why would that be And every time we do an offering we try to prepare it in a way that arms you with that basis Okay Because number one you say well we know that theres a systematic process We know the background and the training of the individuals who are involved and thats a reasonable basis for us as a Commission to ensure that the process conducted itself in an appropriate fashion So thats one process element And number two we were aware of the offering we were given an opportunity that if we were aware of any information that was there that wed be able to factor that in In our view theres some FCC guidance to this affect we think that your responsibility at that point stops at that point Youve reasonably delegated that process to Staff and now itrsquos Staffs responsibility to do its job Does that

Commissioner Crayton responded thatrsquos perfect

Commissioner Johns said I thank you for this I was curious about who decides on the disclosure working group etc the working coordinator that type of thing

Mr Deaton said you know itrsquos funny coming over here I was saying theyrsquore going to ask me the members of the working group is and I donrsquot have the policies and procedures right in front of me The members of the disclosure working group are actually set out specified specially in the policies and procedures They are basically a set of group of people in finance and then the City Attorneyrsquos Office that just represents the people that chopped the wood every single time on the disclosure And so the actual titles of the position are listed on the policies and procedures but theyrsquore the usual suspects of people that do that all the time that an offering is going on The disclosure coordinator has been a number of people I believe is Tyler right now Tyler Tran is the disclosure coordinator right now And itrsquos an individual in the finance department that whorsquos responsibility is to maintain and make sure the boxes the disclosure of policies and procedures are followed Basically it follows the offices of individuals that passed through The individualrsquos names are not listed itrsquos the actual titles that are listed because basically the positions that are responsible for the disclosure

Commissioner Johns said so I was just curious in listening to what you were telling us I mean obviously the FCC is protecting the potential investors in these bonds that are being hellipyou buy something that I will pay you back your principal plus interest So are there conflicts of interest in that can anyone who has been on any of these committees or Airport employees or Airport Commissioners can they purchase these bonds on the open market I mean invest in them

Mr Deaton responded sure they could Yeah

Commissioner Johns said conflict of interest

Mr Deaton said so under the federal securities laws so conflicts of interest breakdown to two basic categories itrsquos important to keep them separate right Therersquos state law conflicts

of interest which Irsquom going to punt on that one because I donrsquot know the answer to that Conflicts of interest in the federal securities laws you know when you come when you think about the federal securities laws it always is focused on one really basic thing So what you hold on something out to be isnrsquot what it is And so conflicts of interest in the federal securities laws focus very heavily on how an offering may hold out to somebody and then it turned out to be something is different than it really was So for example yoursquoll see very frequently underwriters of bonds if the underwriter for example is a member of the governing body for example okay that should be disclosed in the offering document because what the person would say wait a minute I thought you were an impartial individual who are recommending me to buy these bonds and now it turns out that yoursquore actually part of the issuer itself type of a thing And so those are the kinds of conflicts of interest that we look at under the federal securities laws The mere fact that a member of the Commission is purchasing bonds in the open market doesnrsquot mean that any of the offerings have been held out in a fraudulent fashion But it would depend on the facts and circumstances of whatrsquos being done as to whether thatrsquos the case But thatrsquos very different than the state law considerations as to whether or not a board member has a financial interest in the outcome of a decision which is a whole different deal right

Commissioner Johns said therersquos Local 2 I mean

Mr Deaton said right Yeah But federal securities laws conceptualize conflicts of interest different Itrsquos all about have you held this out in a way thatrsquos consistent what it really is

Commissioner Johns said that the kind of disclosure yoursquore

Mr Deaton said thatrsquos what wersquore looking to do there right Where is the sort of 1090 political reform act stuff if you have more of an interest in this that you benefit from this itrsquos a whole same words as it gets confusing because exactly the same words mean very different things in different context

Commissioner Johns said thank you very much for that Excellent

Commissioner Mazzola said thank you very much for your report

E ITEMS INITIATED BY COMMISSIONERS There were no items initiated by Commissioners

F ACTION ITEMS RELATING TO ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS amp MAINTENANCE

Item No 2 was continued to a later meeting

2 Award Contract No 1121151 for Shared Use Passenger Processing System Support Services SITA Information Networking Computing USA Inc $9966543

Resolution awarding Contract No 1121151 for Shared Use Passenger Processing System Support Services to SITA Information Networking Computing USA Inc (SITA) in an amount not to exceed $9966543 for a five‐year term commencing January 1 2019

Good morning Commissioners My name is Eva Cheung‐ Director of Airport Services at SFO Today we seek your approval to award Contract No 1121151 to SITA Information Networking Computing USA for an amount not to exceed $9966543 The term of this support contract will be five years commencing January 1 2019This contract is to provide Level 1 support to the recently approved upgrade to the Airportrsquos shared use passenger processing systems which was also you may recall rewarded to SITA Level 1 support includes technical support for all the hardware and peripherals associated with the common or shared use passenger processing system All the work stations and computers as well as other Airport systems used for passenger processing and information such as the Automated Passport Kiosk in the Customs area the Information Display System which displays messages throughout the terminals to customers and all baggage messaging and reconciliation systems The support contract includes on‐site Staff for 24day 7 daysweek to address user facing issues with printers workstations and scanners In addition to on‐site resolution of issues the support provider is also required to produce detailed reports and documentation covering all service calls the time required for response and resolution of those service requests root‐cause analysis of any failures

Level 1 support also includes maintaining an inventory of replacement hardware and parts replacing and tracking parts or peripherals that are replaced and ordering and replacing consumables such as papers for the various printers

On September 5 2017 the Commission approved for Airport Staff to issue an RFP and enter into negotiations with the highest ranked proposer for these services Staff held a pre‐proposal conference in January 2018 that was attended by interested parties either in person or via conference call On March 7 2018 Staff received three proposals Amadeus

Airport IT Americas Inc Rockwell CollinsARINC and SITA Staff concluded that two of the proposers ARINC and SITA met the minimum qualifications and subsequently convened a four‐member panel to review and score the proposals The panel consisted of four subject matter experts two external and two internal SITA was the highest ranked responsive and responsible proposer and Staff has successfully negotiated the scope of work billing rates and fees with SITA A Notice of Intent to Award was issued to all proposers on October 23 2018 and no protest was received Therefore we recommend your approval to award this contract to SITA With that Irsquod be happy to answer any questions

Commissioner Crayton asked is SITA doing this anywhere else At any other Airport

Ms Cheong responded yes I donrsquot know how many but this is part of their product of services that they offer

Commissioner Crayton asked and ARINC it is not or because I thought that previously we did we have someone that did this here at the Airport

Ms Cheong said ARINC is the current provider which is not under direct contract with the Airport Again itrsquos through the SFO Tech arrangement the consortium of the airlines So ARINC provides this service under their current common use system So itrsquos a sub‐contract to their providing the system

Commissioner Crayton so okay because we never dealt with SITA previously

Ms Cheong responded we have not no

Commissioner Crayton said oh okay because I noticed the scoring was very close

Ms Cheong said it was a very close score yes

Commissioner Crayton said it was very close And so okay

Ms Cheong said they are the main two providers that Irsquom aware of throughout the United States for service

Commissioner Crayton said thank you

Commissioner Mazzola announced alright we have two speakers for this okay Diana Oldag Do you want to go first I donrsquot care Okay you must be Jerome is that right

Good morning Commissioners My name is Jerome Lavault Irsquom the head of sales for ARINC Rockwell Collins The existing Level 1 supplier for more than 20 years at your Airport And we ask for the evaluation sheets and yesterday night we got from Ms Monzoacuten the scoring sheet and Ms Crayton yoursquore absolutely right therersquos only 54 points

difference between SITA the winner and us the second one out of 11200 And reviewing the scoring sheet we think there is a math error on the pricing sections that will give us more points 83 points to be exact And we swing the results and put ARINC as Number 1 for this RFP So thatrsquos my statement

Commissioner Mazzola asked alright so what are we going to do about this

Mr Ivar Satero Airport Director said Staff has anyone confirm Have we done the scoring independent check of the scoring Do we have any knowledge of this

Ms Cheung said yes there was an independent check of the scoring through the our Contracts Administration Unit

Commissioner Johns said I donrsquot understand your answer

Commissioner Crayton said I donrsquot either

Mr Satero said and wersquore not aware of a

Ms Cheung said Irsquom not aware of a discrepancy in the scoring

Mr Satero said well if there is an error in the scoring we need to make sure the scoring is correct So wersquoll have to

Commissioner Mazzola asked Jerome have you given your findings to anybody Have you given show where the error is

Mr Lavault responded no we havenrsquot now because we received it late late afternoon I work late last night but I can definitely provide a quick email to Ms Monzoacuten today explaining where we think the mistake is And the mistake

Commissioner Johns asked you mean itrsquos an addition or a subtraction or

Mr Lavault responded itrsquos a subtraction Yeah So basically SITA score highest on one one element And when you do the math when you go back to the RFPs they rank you know if you score the cheapest price because we were the cheapest price first on the whole RFP Yeah So when you go back to the main RFP there is a section that explain exactly the one who scored the most will have the most points So we got 2400 points And there is a mathematical formula that will give the points to the second one and when we do that we have a difference in our favor of 83 points We scored much better and if there is a 54 different points overall we will score number one on this RFP So I will provide this findings to Ms Monzoacuten

Commissioner Johns said Irsquom just curious may I Why did you wait so long to request the

scoring sheet Or was it not available to you

Mr Lavault responded but we got it Ms Monzoacuten you can maybe answer that We just got it yesterday

Ms Monzon said I believe it was 3 orsquoclock that these we sent the information

Commissioner Johns said oh so it wasnrsquot available before

Ms Stacey Lucas Legal said the request was made on Friday afternoon for a an immediate disclosure and under the Sunshine Ordinance that means by the close of business the next following business day which would have been yesterday But under the Sunshine Ordinance any party can ask for anyone any members of the public can ask for the scores as soon as they are complete

Commissioner Johns asked and they were complete when

Ms Lucas responded a long time ago

Commissioner Mazzola said alright thanks for your input So letrsquos hear from SITA people first And then wersquoll talk about it State your name

Good morning Honorable Commissioners My name is Diana Oldag and Irsquom a Sr Account Manager for SITA SITA requested a copy of those scores many weeks ago as soon as the intent to award was published we requested those Theres much more to this RFP than just the pricing that was given We actually put together a work plan that detailed the number of supervisors lead technicians and technicians that would be employed throughout the course of the week given the peak times of the Airport operations The scoring the actual pricing that was quoted was per employee So unfortunately ARINC is stating that their quote came in so much less but they actually I believe based on their work plan had fewer employees that they were actually calculating in the financial consideration So I would like to say that we thought that it was a very extensive RFP process We were we were asked to in the oral interview we explained our logic behind the staffing that was required We had heard we had actually asked I believe No actually I take that back We have worked at other airports that are of similar size to San Francisco and provided a scope of work and the number of technicians lead technicians and support technicians based on our experience at airports in the US of equal size I would like to thank you for your consideration and we hope that we look forward to expanding our partnership with SFO and delivering an experience to the Airport its tenants and passengers that is an exceptional experience

Commissioner Mazzola said thank you for your comment

Commissioner Johns said well it seems to me that because therersquos this question and Staff

canrsquot tell us definitely that we should have somebody do the arithmetic and it should come back to us

Commissioner Mazzola said alright so the urgency then of this could be put off until our next meeting Is that correct Ivar

Mr Satero responded thatrsquos correct Commissioner

Commissioner Mazzola said alright so wersquoll pull this off the calendar today and have the numbers done you know relooked at and then wersquoll put it back on the calendar in two weeks Alright thank you

3 Approval of a Trial Program with Briggo Inc for Installation and Operation of Robotic Espresso Vending Machines

Resolution approving a twelve‐month trial program with Briggo Inc for the installation of Robotic Espresso Vending Machines

Good morning Commissioners My name is Nanette Hendrickson Irsquom the Assistant Director for Revenue Development amp Management at SFO I am here this morning to seek your approval to commence a trial for Hi‐tech Robotic Espresso Vending machines This trial will allow Staff to gauge customer interest while potentially increasing the passenger experience and revenues to the Airport For this trial the Airport will work with Briggo Inc to gauge the feasibility of the new concept Briggorsquos Coffee House vending machines will operate 247 and provide all‐day access to high quality coffee and espresso drinks to customers via either a proprietary app online website or on a touchscreen displayed by the unit This service would be especially helpful for passengers during late or delayed flights and for employees on early morning shifts when restaurants are closed Staff will place the machines in three locations Two locations in Terminal 3 and a third location to be determined Rent will be the greater of the Minimum Annual Guarantee of ($1000 per location per month) or 15 of revenues And with that Irsquod be happy to answer any questions

Commissioner Crayton said I donrsquot have a question I love it

Ms Hendrickson said terrific I like that answer

Commissioner Crayton said I like it so very much

Commissioner Mazzola said I have a question So how do they decide what coffee to use

Ms Hendrickson responded so Briggo has its own brand right now but and itrsquos from four Latin American countries but theyrsquore also in talks with local roasters I spoke to the owner and theyrsquore in negotiations so I canrsquot tell you which names they are but wersquore going to use them locally

Commissioner Mazzola said so itrsquos a high tech machine so Irsquom assuming they could probably have three or four different types of coffee in there

Ms Hendrickson said correct Right and they have hot and cold And a lot of different options

Commissioner Johns asked regular and decaf

Ms Hendrickson responded yes Wersquoll have so many options

Commissioner Johns said yoursquoll be surprise how many donrsquot sell decaf

Commissioner Mazzola said we do have a speaker here Alright thanks for your presentation Thank you

Commissioner Mazzola announced so the speaker we have is Cynthia Yeung

Good morning Commissioners Irsquom a little nervous Irsquove never actually done this before My name is Cynthia Yueng I am the Chief Operating Officer of Cafeacute X a robotic coffee bar chain right here based in San Francisco with three locations and 26 employees We work with local roasters two beloved women‐owned businesses right here in San Francisco Equator and Ritual We worked with a design company based in San Francisco to design our latest machine We offer health insurance to all of our employees including 401Ks to our part time employees And my question for the Commissioners is this We are striving to be a very very responsible employer in San Francisco bringing trade jobs back to the City And I want to understand why with so little transparency this trial program was awarded to a Texas based company Wersquove been in talks with San Francisco Irsquove been asking you know for permission to operate in San Francisco in SFO And Irsquove been stonewalled I have not been given any sort of criteria by which this trial program was decided upon and I would like to ask for a fair consideration for participation in this trial program Thank you

Commissioner Mazzola said okay thank you for your comments Has this been negotiated with your group Nanette

Ms Hendrickson responded I can just say this is a trial Itrsquos only a 12‐month period and the Staff that was looking into researching this they selected Briggo because theyrsquove been around and are battled‐tested Theyrsquove been in theyrsquore in another airport theyrsquore also in high traffic areas in colleges They have a high capacity theyrsquore in quick This is what the

Staff found and it wasnrsquot anything against Cafeacute X It was just they thought for our environment this would be a good fit to test with this 12‐month trial

Commissioner Mazzola said alright as far as the comment that shersquos been stonewalled I donrsquot ever heard we ever stonewalled anybody So something must be amiss there

Ms Hendrickson said yes I donrsquot know anything about that I know that our Staff did go down and tested Cafeacute X I know that they visited it and but I donrsquot know anything about being stonewalled And our office is very open and if Cafeacute X would like to meet with us we can definitely postpone this

Commissioner Johns asked is Cafeacute X a similar robotic product

Ms Hendrickson responded it is My understanding is that Cafeacute X is a little bit different in terms of itrsquos more theatrical You see you get to see more of whatrsquos happening where Briggo is a little bit behind the scenes a little bit more

Commissioner Johns said no Irsquom just saying is it an automatic thing like wersquore picturing here

Ms Hendrickson responded yes it is automatic

Commissioner Johns asked itrsquos not run by people

Ms Hendrickson said correct But I think maybe they can speak to it a little bit better I understand sure but I think they do have one person thatrsquos outside the robotic arm

Commissioner Crayton said okay excuse me For me after hearing this I guess Im a little distress because I feel as if and certainly support what you are sending forth to the Commission But it would have been great to have had a comparison To have seen that and for that person to have had an opportunity for that Particularly when I heard the environment in which theyre working and what theyre doing the environment etc I also think that this is wonderful but it also leaves a vacuum for me now is to what is it that we dont know And so thats what my concern is and why wouldnt we have given two people that opportunity to see since its a trial run anyway Thatrsquos the question that I have and also I want to know the ethnic make‐up of both of these businesses

Commissioner Mazzola said one is a robot

Commissioner Crayton said one is a robot and the other one is

Commissioner Johns said itrsquos backed by something

Commissioner Crayton said but itrsquos back by something So I want to know that too So I

donrsquot feel settled about this no

Commissioner Mazzola said so why donrsquot you two hook up to meet here So you can meet and I donrsquot know if there is another place available so we can have two machines at the same time in another terminal or something I donrsquot know You can look at that

Ms Hendrickson said thatrsquos a great suggestion we can look for that

Commissioner Mazzola said so then like Linda said you can have two people

Commissioner Crayton said no you talk to him You guys got to figure it out you know

Commissioner Mazzola said okay thank you

Commissioner Johns said it seems to me if I could add this When we go out for trial I mean wersquove had other trials But wersquove always been locally based and look for folks in the Bay Area rather than out of the area and out of state Obviously we do want the best possible product to give our passengers and clients but I think we need more information on this before we vote

Commissioner Crayton said wersquore not going to vote today

Commissioner Mazzola asked so whatrsquos your pleasure Commissioners

Commissioner Johns responded well I think to pull it off the calendar

Mr Satero responded wersquoll remove it Wersquoll remove it from the calendar

Commissioner Mazzola said alright wersquore pulling Item 3 off Items 2 and 3

Item No 4 was approved unanimously by a motion by Commissioner Johns and a second by Commissioner Crayton

4 Approval of Phase D (Establish Final Guaranteed Maximum Price) to Contract No 1051176 Design‐Build Services for the Airport Security Infrastructure Program Hunt Construction Group Inc $11194143

No 18‐0356 Resolution approving Phase D to Contract No 1051176 Design‐Build Services for the Airport Security Infrastructure Program with Hunt Construction Group Inc in an amount of $11194 143 to establish the Final Guaranteed Maximum Price of $138233019

Good morning Irsquom Judi Mosqueda Director of Project Management This Item is for your approval of Phase D establishing the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for a contract with Hunt Construction for the Airport Security Infrastructure Program The Phase D approval increases the contract capacity by $112 million for a new contract capacity amount of $1382 million and increases the contract duration to a total of 1190 days It also includes a decrease to the contingency amount The program is enhancing the Airportrsquos Security systems based on a prioritized set of recommendations established in the Airportrsquos Security Implementation Master Plan It includes three distinct projects for Airport wide improvement and expansion of security systems to increase safety and security of the Airportrsquos assets operations and technology This contract provides design build services for the program This approval establishes a final GMP amount sufficient to assume the remaining risk to complete the project with cost components as follows 1) Unawarded based contract scope 2) Pending additional scope and trends 3) Trade Package Allowances for other anticipated scope and 4) Trade Package Set Reserves which is the contractorrsquos contingency to cover any obligation it has under the final GMP including scope gaps design errors and omissions construction coordination costs cost increases due to market conditions and non‐Airport initiated design changes or clarifications The forecast for this contract is $1429 million which is within the contract budget of $1456 million We would like to extend this contract for a total of 1990 days due to date delays during the programming phase At the conclusion of programming the program was slightly over budget and an additional time was used to realign the program scope with the budget The new substantial completion date is now August 12 2019 The LBE goals for this contract is 18 for design services and 11 for construction services Hunt Construction Group is committed to meeting these goals We recommend your approval and I would be happy to answer any questions

Commissioner Crayton said yes I have a question How do they plan to meet these goals and complete them on time when they are already 1190 days behind scoping And also one of my questions also I had it said unawarded contract scope Irsquom not sure I understand that

Ms Mosqueda responded when we typically throughout our capital program we like to try to set our guaranteed maximum price We begin our negotiations with the contractors when wersquore about 80 bought out Wersquove issued 80 of the trade packages At that point therersquos a fair amount of certainty for the contractor and for the Airport on what the final price of the contract should be based upon market conditions and experience of administering the project We begin our negotiations at 80 and typically settle when wersquore closer to 90 It takes a period of time to get through those negotiations with the contractor And so I think Irsquom forgetting what your question was Irsquom sorry

Commissioner Crayton responded Irsquom not the one to ask because I forgot what I said

Ms Mosqueda said sorry about that

Commissioner Crayton said Irsquom only kidding

Ms Mosqueda said and then you were asking about the LBE percentages So Hunt Construction is on a path to meet the 11 for the construction services They have already theyrsquore already on their way to the 18 for design and for construction We monitor it every month with our progress payments and during partnering sessions And they are on their way fulfilling those two goals for design and construction

Commissioner Crayton said alright thank you

Item No 5 was approved unanimously by a motion by Commissioner Crayton and a second by Commissioner Johns

5 Approval of Phase D (Establish Final Guaranteed Maximum Price) to Contract No 903466 Design‐Build Services for the Demolition of Terminal 2 Air Traffic Control Tower Project Turner Construction Company $4484042

No 18‐0357 Resolution approving Phase D to Contract No 903466 Design‐Build Services for the Demolition of Terminal 2 Air Traffic Control Tower Project with Turner Construction Company in an amount of $4484042 to establish the Final Guaranteed Maximum Price of $81246571 and to increase the contract duration to 1421 consecutive calendar days

Ms Mosqueda said this Item is for your approval of Phase D establishing the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) to our contract with Turner Construction for the Demolition of the Terminal 2 Air Traffic Control Tower Project The Phase D approval increases the contract capacity by $45 million for a new contract capacity amount of $812 million and increases the contract duration to a total of 1421 days It also includes a decrease to the contingency amount by $29 million for a new contingency of $28 million The Project includes demolition of the existing Air Traffic Control Tower and design and construction of a new office block on top of Terminal 2 The new floors may be used for a new airline lounge office space a new employee cafeacute and a public observation deck As you know demolition of the old tower has been completed already And steel erection for the new floors is underway This approval establishes a final GMP amount sufficient to assume the remaining risk to complete the Project with cost components that are consistent with the last agenda item The forecast for this contract is $826 million which is within the contract budget of $841 million The Projectrsquos schedule will be extended from November 20 2019 to February 2 2020 due to some design changes and procurement delays during enabling work The LBE goals for this contract are 24 for design services and 20 for construction services Turner Construction Company is committed to meeting these goals We recommend your approval and Irsquod be happy to answer questions

Commissioner Crayton said okay the other Airport Tower did they did they were they the builder of that

Ms Mosqueda responded no The new Tower that was built was built by Hensel Phelps Construction

Commissioner Crayton said okay thatrsquos it I just wanted to know

No 18‐0358 Resolution approving Phase D to Contract No 8427C66 Design‐Build Services for the Mel Leong Treatment Plant Industrial Wastewater and Recycled Water Upgrades Project with Walsh Construction Company II LLC in an amount of $3347242 to establish the Final Guaranteed Maximum Price of $61361534

Ms Mosqueda said this Item is for your approval of Phase D establishing the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for our contract with Walsh Construction for the Industrial Wastewater and Recycled Water Upgrades Project The Phase D approval increases the contract capacity by $33 million for a new contract capacity amount of $614 million and increases the contract duration to a total of 1272 days It also includes a decrease to the contingency The Project includes replacement of Industrial Waste Treatment Processes and upgrades to the Recycled Water Treatment System at the Plant This approval establishes a final GMP amount sufficient to assume the remaining risk to complete the Project with cost components consistent with the last two agenda items The forecast for this contract is $614 million which is within the contract budget of $624 million This Phase D approval also authorizes an additional 70‐day non‐compensable time extension for a new contract duration of 1272 days This extension is necessary to support revisions to the Trade Package procurement schedule To obtain greater LBE subcontractor participation The new substantial completion date is January 12 2020 The LBE goals for this contract are 20 for design services and 20 for construction services and Walsh Construction is committed to meeting these goals We recommend your approval and I would be happy to answer questions

There were no questions from the Commission

7 Approval of Phase C1 to Contract No 1100166 Design‐Build Services for the Wayfinding Enhancement Program Fisher Development Inc $2963258

No 18‐0359 Resolution approving Phase C1 to Contract No 1100166 Design‐Build Services for the Wayfinding Enhancement Program with Fisher Development Inc to increase the contract capacity amount by $2963258 for a new contract capacity amount of $10263258 with a corresponding contingency amount and with no change to the contract duration

This Item is for your approval of Phase C1 for our contract with Fisher for the Wayfinding Enhancement Program The Phase C1 approval will increase the contract capacity by $3 million for a new contract capacity amount of $103 million with a corresponding amount of contingency and with no change to the contract duration The Wayfinding Enhancement Program encompasses both the development of an Airport‐wide Wayfinding Master Plan and Signage Standards as well as the implementation of signage and wayfinding solutions The implementation scope is intentionally structured to be flexible to be able to address changing priorities of projects within the current Ascent Program ndash Phase 1 Base scope of this contract includes Wayfinding improvements to the Mezzanine Level and Landside Departures area of Terminal 2 Recently scope has been added to this contract to accommodate Airport‐wide Wayfinding to the new Hotel a digital Welcoming sign and a Gate renumbering strategy This approval will add initial design services for schematic design and early construction activities Following the completion of the Programming Phase and finalizing of Project scope Staff will return to the Commission to request authorization to award the remaining design services The budget for this contract has been increased from $143 million to $247 million to accommodate the new scopes of work and is forecasted to be on budget The Project remains on schedule to be substantially complete in February of 2022 The LBE goals for this contract are 13 for design services and 20 for construction services and Fisher is committed to meeting these goals We recommend your approval and Irsquod be happy to answer questions

Commissioner Johns said so I donrsquot have a specific question on this Item But on our Consent Calendar under Item 9 We have this Professional Services Contract for the Wayfinding Enhancement Program And Irsquom just I mean I know why arenrsquot we taking these two together Or are they totally unconnected They canrsquot possibly be unconnected right

Ms Mosqueda responded yoursquore correct that theyrsquore connected For each project that we administer we have an Airport Project Manager a PMSS team which is Agenda Item No 9 and a design builder And so we could of paired them together It didnrsquot occur to me to do so The PMSS team is performing fairly well And with those small amount in increase itrsquos an annual increase for them For their next year of services

Commissioner Johns said itrsquos just helpful for us when theyrsquore on this Item to be reassured Folks these Project Management Support Service people are doing what they should be doing in overseeing the Project that you just brought to us in Item 7

Ms Mosqueda responded I can watch for that in the future Wersquoll watch for that and pair them up

G CONSENT CALENDAR OF ROUTINE ADMINISTATIVE MATTERS The Consent Calendar Item Nos 8 through 12 was approved unanimously upon a motion by Commissioner Crayton and a second by Commissioner Johns

8 Modification No 1 to Lease No GS‐09P‐LCA03395 with the United States of America to Extend the Term and Increase the Annual Rent for Offices Occupied by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation $615385

No 18‐0360 Resolution approving Modification No 1 to Lease No GS‐09P‐LCA03395 with the United States of America to extend the term of the Lease by three years two years firm and increase the annual rent to $615385 and direct the Commission Secretary to forward Lease Modification No 1 to the Board of Supervisors for approval

No 18‐0361 Resolution approving Modification No 4 to Professional Services Contract No 1100141 Project Management Support Services for the Wayfinding Enhancement Program with SFO Partners a Joint‐Venture of ASL and AGS Inc in an amount of $2400000 for a new contract amount not to exceed $5100000 for services through November 27 2019

10 Approval of Modification No 2 to Professional Services Contract No 8465C41 Project Management Support Services for the Superbay Hangar Fire Protection System Replacement Project C M Pros $634130

No 18‐0362 Resolution approving Modification No 2 to Professional Services Contract No 8465C41 Project Management Support Services for the Superbay Hangar Fire Protection System Replacement Project with CM Pros to increase the contract amount by $634130 for a total contract not‐to‐exceed amount of $2612928 for the third year of services through November 23 2019

No 18‐0363 Resolution approving Modification No 8 to Professional Services Contract No 927341 Project Management Support Services for the Long Term Parking Garage No 2 Project with the Allen Group LLC Cooper Pugeda Management Inc A Joint Venture in an amount of $400000 for a new contract not‐to‐exceed amount of $7885000 with no change to the contract duration

12 Award Contract No 11065 9‐1‐1 System Replacement Services ATampT California $1300000

No 18‐0364 Resolution awarding Contract No 11065 for 9‐1‐1 System Replacement Services to ATampT California in an amount not to exceed $1300000 for a term of five years commencing November 15 2018 with one 2‐year option to extend the contract exercisable at the sole discretion of the Airport Commission

Commissioner Johns said so actually I did have one other this 9‐1‐1 ATampT thing How does 9‐1‐1 What does this do How does the 9‐1‐1 work at the Airport

Mr Ralf Ruckelhausen Chief Operating Officer responded this is this Item is specifically for we have 18 workstations We also have a backup 9‐1‐1 Center that has three

workstations with the Police Department And then we also have three more Units in our Mobile Command Post So this is our centralized center that all 9‐1‐1 calls go into and handle the dispatch

Commissioner Johns asked from cell phones

Mr Ruckelhausen responded yes yes And when you end up looking at the intent of this is what we want to move from a legacy system that we have today to a more modern system thatrsquos referred to as Next Gen 9‐1‐1 that will allow us to do texting you end up looking at video communications so on and so forth

Commissioner Crayton asked did you send this out to bid

Mr Ruckelhausen responded yes yes we did We had two proposals

Commissioner Crayton commented you did Oh yeah ATampT and Frontier Communications Interesting Okay

Commissioner Johns said okay thanks I was just curious

Commissioner Crayton commented not a problem

H NEW BUSINESS Discussion only This is the Public Comment section of the calendar Individuals may address the Commission on any topic within the jurisdiction of the Airport Commission for a period of up to two (2) minutes Please fill out a Request to Speak form located on the table next to the speakers microphone and submit it to the Commission Secretary

Ms Monzoacuten announced you have two Speaker cards

Commissioner Mazzola said two speakers Okay Tariq Mehmood

Mr Tariq Mehmood said good afternoon Commissioners You have seen the request and I gave you the photocopies of whatrsquos going on in the Taxi Lots In the past we use to have four lots for distribution Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 They took away Lot 1 from us and we remain quiet Later on they took away Lot 4 also from us and we remain quiet And now we have Lot 2 and 3 And now theyrsquore taking away Lot 2 and 3 also from us Telling us to go to a picnic table where nobody goes It doesnrsquot make sense And if you say okay well give you Lot 2 Whatrsquos wrong with Lot 3 Lot 2 just like this room people sitting there and we distribute Lot 3 same 100 same People sitting there and we distribute So Lot 2 and 3 wersquore working there and itrsquos very safe Cab driver sitting in the cabs and we are handing over the flyers in the cabs And it takes us much less time If you give us only Lot 2 that would be 5‐days job And if you keep the Lot 2 and 3 that would be 2‐days job Itrsquos more safe instead of making this story up of picnic table please Tell these people that do

the fair way They are giving you false documents They gave you false documents when we were talking about the Lot 4 For the parking garage which was 50 empty and they were saying its 85 sold out And I provided information from the 400 days from freedom of information the Lot records for 400 days which show 50 empty Now they are all this cases presented to you I doubt on their integrity Lot 2 and 3 are very safe We just walk Cabs are sitting there as you see in one of the picture and we hand over and we walk out So please just let us continue I mean wersquore not doing any harm any damage any argument any fight Whatrsquos wrong with it Itrsquos just intention to deny us our rights our first freedom first amendment Thank you very much

Commissioner Mazzola said thank you Tariq Okay Mark

Thank you Commissioner Mazzola Commissioners Mark Gruberg San Francisco Taxi Workers Alliance There is no safety issue in the Taxi Lots I talked with Abu Azam last week and he said that despite this new rule that you passed that therersquos a blanket prohibition that we would be able to distribute materials in Lot 2 and at a picnic table in Lot 3 And you know I appreciate some accommodation but itrsquos still in the Rules that we canrsquot do it at all and that Rule needs to change And we have to have more access We have to have access to all the Lots Or at least two of the Lots in order to be able to effectively put out information to cab drivers so I hope you will change that Rule I also want to ask why management is supporting this MTA plan that it will ban most cabs and most cab drivers from the Airport And this is going to jeopardize the jobs and the livelihood of thousands of cab drivers And the MTA is not a disinterested decision making body It has an enormous financial jeopardy Itrsquos medallion program and itrsquos being sued by the San Francisco Federal Credit Union And itrsquos coming down in a way to protect its own interest The Airport should be making decisions about who has access to the Airport That seems to be very simple The third thing I want to mention is congestion and public safety and particularly related to Uber and Lyft An article came out in Forbes about a week ago that says wersquove been saying for a long long time that this is not just a congestion issue with TNCs Itrsquos a safety issue There have been two or four percent more fatalities owing to Uber and Lyft since they have been operating Thank you

Commissioner Mazzola said alright thank you and announced Renate State your last name for me when you get there

Ms Renate Wymiarkiewicz said I drive for National Cab 789 Irsquove had Irsquove been driving 25 years and Irsquove had a medallion for 15 years And we were promised with the K medallion that when we signed up I signed up back in rsquo94 that I would probably wait 10 years to get a medallion And I would have it lsquotil I die and it would be my retirement And I waited 15 years to receive the medallion And after I received it in rsquo09 2010 they started to sell them to $250000 to the drivers And all of these other drivers on that list they never got their money back even And the list is still somewhere I donrsquot know whatrsquos happening to all of these people who have been denied their medallions Like I got it finally after 15 years And now they want to kick us out the K medallions out of the Airport saying they only will allow those who bought for $250000 to work the Airport because they canrsquot make the payments But the taxi system is such that we have even though wersquoll sit two hours and wait in line the taxis are still moving 300 cabs in an hour moving in and out

If they only allow 500 to work yoursquoll never have enough cabs at the Airport because wersquore always coming back And not all those 500 that bought work the Airport A lot of them just want to work the City And then the issue with Uber drivers itrsquos thousands coming in and out of the Airport Theyrsquore all picking up and dropping off upstairs on Departure Levels and theyrsquore causing a major chaos And Irsquove seen them the last 10 days I think three accidents at the Airport and seeing the cars that were involved Irsquom sure that at least one of them in each accident was the Uber driver You can tell by their cars who they are And theyrsquore driving crazy they have no sense of responsibility to drive safe They cut us all off and run us off the roads City and Airport and Freeway And itrsquos just itrsquos chaos out there with them And then on top of that wersquore hearing that a lot of them driving without insurance which is not fair to us I pay $680 a month for my million‐dollar liability policy And then we hear a bunch of them donrsquot even carry insurance And that can be a big problem for you at the Airport because if someone dies there from a driver whorsquos not insured and Uber doesnrsquot even want to you know accept responsibility Irsquove had customers tell me they had to sue Uber because they were in a bad accident with them And they didnrsquot want to pay And I can only imagine what will happen at the Airport if they find out you got a driver who had a crash killed somebody and they were not insured

Commissioner Mazzola said you got to wind it up

Ms Wymiarkiewicz said well anyway thatrsquos what I wanted to let you all know the things that are going on with them and with us

Commissioner Mazzola said I have no more sheets State your name and who you represent

This is my first time to come here My name is Ibrahim Diallo and I am a citizen of Mali West Africa And Irsquom a new taxi driver Irsquove been driving taxi for about four months So yesterday my friend you know distribute a leaflet and if Irsquom available to come and speak For sure Well we must be very careful The United States is known for its freedom of expression and what is happening at the Airport now our freedom of expression is in danger hellipa French Philosopher said I would say in French and translate for you Je ne peux pas drsquoaccord avec ce que vous dites mais que je me battrais agrave lrsquoextrecircme afin que vous pouvez lrsquoexprimer Meaning I may not agree with what you said but I would fight to the extreme so that you can express it So in the United States we have that also in the constitution This even attracted me from my country when before I come here when I use to go to the US library Like we hold this truth to be self‐evident That all men are created equal and they are in endowed in certain in enabling rights And among these rights are the freedom of called the freedom of expression religion etc Freedom of expression Now we as a taxi kind of union we decide to distribute leaflet to our colleagues and the Airport is forbidding it Itrsquos very delicate We have to be very careful mostly in the State of California The United States is the leading country in the world Our democracy is the best ever and the freedom of expression is I mean respected here more than any place in the world And California is the heart and the lungs of America We are the leading state of the United States And yet San Francisco is again the center the Bay Area is the center of California And saying that at San Francisco Airport people are being refuse their right to distribute leaflet to express themselves Thatrsquos very delicate Yoursquove got to be careful So thatrsquos one point I wanted to say The second one is

Commissioner Mazzola said okay thank you I appreciate it Yoursquore running out of time here

Mr Diallo responded sorry about that If you could explain to us give us good ground or argument why yoursquore supporting the MTA Decision of taking our Lots giving them to

Commissioner Mazzola responded let me speak right away I donrsquot think this Commission supported that I donrsquot know where yoursquore getting that But this Commission has never had that before them and we have not agreed with MTA on that issue

Mr Diallo said what I want to say quickly is I like Uber I like Lyft I donrsquot hate them because this corporation created jobs too But taking the hellip of the drivers who were here before Uber was created and give it to corporation I mean just helping the minority The corporation I mean against the majority of people who will be unemployed

Commissioner Mazzola said okay come on We canrsquot start a debate here

Mr Diallo said thank you very much

Commissioner Mazzola said alright Are you looking to speak too You got to fill out a form but come up and speak and then you fill it out after you speak After you speak fill it out Go ahead

Hi Everybody My name is Antonio Yon Irsquove been a cab driver a San Francisco cab driver for over 25 years And you know what Irsquom not very happy nowadays because I lost a lot of money Well itrsquos a long story Since Uber and Lyft got in to the City of San Francisco California And Irsquom very depressed I couldnrsquot pay my bills I couldnrsquot do practically I lost my house What Irsquom trying to say is now in the City is really problematic Busy very busy Well too much traffic thatrsquos making me sick Itrsquos hard for me I mean to work in the City Really I use to work I love the City I love to work in the City but nowadays it seems like Uber and Lyft Theyrsquore taking over the City and itrsquos clear everybody knows that So I decided to work at the Airport You know thatrsquos the only way I can even though I have to wait 2‐3 hours getting a fare back to the City or elsewhere You know so I really urge you guys to realize that we cab drivers are working very very hard in order to survive Okay please Try to let us you know medallion holders to go to the Airport please Okay I really appreciate it

Commissioner Mazzola said thank you

Commissioner Crayton said thank you so much

Commissioner Mazzola said alright so itrsquos back to the Commission So I want to express about revisiting the thing about them not being able to literature their drivers I think we talked about it once before and we moved it to a picnic table I never heard anybody say that wersquore doing it because itrsquos there has been accidents thatrsquos been reported Jeff You didnrsquot say yeah we had six accidents because of it and thatrsquos why wersquore moving it You know I like to revisit that and find out

what thatrsquos all about If wersquore allowing them to go to 2and give the stuff out Why not 3 and give the stuff out or brought the numbers back to hellipWhatever that is

Mr Jeff Littlefield Chief Operating Officer said just the comments that I would make is there is some risks in leafleting in areas in parking lots where cars are moving And that was the safety concern that was brought forth

Commissioner Mazzola said I mean therersquos risks in everything Itrsquos like they say in their literature Therersquos risk in getting out of your cab when you go to the bathroom Therersquos all kinds of risks so there must be more than that why we made that move

Mr Littlefield said the designation of Lot 2 where the picnic tables are is also a Lot that all of the taxi cabs whether theyrsquore in Lot 1 2 3 or 4 have to pass through in order to be dispatch at SFO So every the target audience all of the cab drivers are actually reachable in the designated Lot 2 that wersquore making reference to In addition to that

Commissioner Johns asked they go from Lot to another And then they go if they parked in 3 they have to go to 2 before they come out

Mr Littlefield responded yes The Dispatch Lot is I believe is Lot 1 And Lot 2 is the Lot they have to go through in order to get to the Dispatch Lot And in addition that Lot contains I believe two food trucks restrooms the picnic tables a number of picnic tables where therersquos social gatherings and interactions amongst cab drivers on a routine basis and really we as an Airport believe that having this spot designated which allows then to reach their target audiences in the best interest of safety as well as

Commissioner Mazzola said what was hurting us as an Airport with them doing it the way they were doing it What was hurting us

Mr Littlefield responded well the concern is with our highest core values safety and security And the fact that when they walk between the cars focusing on leafleting and the cab drivers may be looking at cell phones and when those cars move at unpredictable times they could actually incur an accident And that was the concern

Commissioner Mazzola said well I tell you Irsquom not convinced yet No one has convinced me thatrsquos a safety issue And I I donrsquot understand why we wouldnrsquot let them distribute to their members or non‐members whether theyrsquore union or not it doesnrsquot matter to me But they should be able to distribute what theyrsquore trying to get theyrsquore trying to stay together They have a big problem with Uber and Lyft And theyrsquore trying to stay together And they have to communicate with each other in some fashion And if theyrsquove been communicating with these leaflets Why do we want to stop that

Mr Littlefield responded oh we definitely do not

Commissioner Mazzola said okay we donrsquot want to stop that But what yoursquore saying they have to pass through 2 to get to 3 or 3 to But do you want them to leaflet while theyrsquore driving through one section You want them to leaflet while theyrsquore moving and not parked What do you want them to do

Mr Littlefield responded so when they come into Lot 2 generally they park their vehicles And therersquos an opportunity therersquos an opportunity there where those vehicles arenrsquot moving and they get out to access picnic tables the food trucks or the restrooms for that exchange to take place

Commissioner Mazzola said I hear yoursquore trying to say something

Mr Satero said I see what the problem is It takes someone to stand there all day to be able to cover the folks as they move to Lot 2 And probably thatrsquos whatrsquos mostly objectionable Itrsquos because it takes that amount of time to be there to wait for the traffic to flow through all the lots to get there to Lot 2 instead of

Commissioner Mazzola asked are you willing to pay for somebody

Mr Satero responded no sir no sir

Commissioner Mazzola said I know yoursquore not

Mr Satero said so I think our intent was to have a safe operation but access to all the cab drivers I understand what theyrsquore saying It would now take that full time person to stand there through several hours to cover that complete group

Commissioner Mazzola said and therersquos no proof to what was going on before was not safe I mean I understand if you look at walking between cabs but there was no accidents of any nature that we put before us to say you know four people got killed or whatever Therersquos nothing

Commissioner Johns asked this was just changed in the Rules that just passed a few weeks ago

Mr Littlefield said that go in effect January 1st

Commissioner Crayton asked was there was there if I understood correctly before there was some disruption in terms of slowing down etc etc Irsquom not sure if that was what it was But I knew there were I remember there was some rational as to why it was carried out the way that it was

Mr Littlefield said yeah we do want the line ques to flow smoothly and you know thatrsquos not the major reason for this But certainly it plays a part But the focus is clearly safety in having people walking between cars that move unpredictably

Commissioner Mazzola said so Ivar therersquos only three of us here today The other two will be back

at the next meeting So I request we bring that Rule back to the Commission to review it and vote on that Rule

Mr Satero responded okay will do that Commissioner Wersquoll bring that back to you Yes

Commissioner Crayton said I think that the group thatrsquos here at the Airport thatrsquos doing it look at it see where we can tweak it If it can be tweaked for safety reasons because you were ultimately wersquore responsible if something happens And so having said that I know we looked at all the variables So I suggest Mr President that you give them an opportunity to look at that To maybe reach out have some discussions and then we can come back with something but I think they know what theyrsquore doing as well as we do Thatrsquos all that Irsquom saying

Commissioner Mazzola commented theyrsquove been discussing it to you You even responded to them in a letter There has been communication going back and forth What Irsquom saying is Irsquom not convinced It was a safety issue that we had a change So if you want to bring it back to the Commission so we can talk about it next time with Rich and Peter

Commissioner Crayton asked but can we take responsibility for a safety issue

Mr Mazzola responded wersquove been for all these years Wersquove been doing it

Commissioner Crayton commented these people are on the ground Irsquom not there every day You understand what Irsquom saying

Mr Satero said you know we will do our assessment provide you our assessment of the safety requests involved

Commissioner Mazzola said bring it back to us

Mr Satero responded understood Commissioner

Commissioner Mazzola said thatrsquos it Thank you for your attention

I CORRESPONDENCE There was no discussion by the Commission

J CLOSED SESSION There are no planned agenda items for a Closed Session for the current meeting

In the event of any urgent matter requiring immediate action which has come to the attention of the Airport Commission after the agenda was issued and which is an item appropriately addressed

in Closed Session the Airport Commission may discuss and vote whether to conduct a Closed Session under Brown Act (California Government Code Sections 549542(b)(2) and 549545) and Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code Section 6711)

If the Airport Commission enters Closed Session under such circumstances the Airport Commission will discuss and vote whether to disclose action taken or discussions held in Closed Session under the Brown Act (California Government Code Section 549571) and Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code Section 6712)

K ADJOURNMENT There being no further calendared business before the Commission the meeting adjourned at 1016 AM

(Original signed by Corina Monzoacuten) C Corina Monzoacuten Airport Commission Secretary

m110618

m110618 Attachment

CALENDAR SECTION

AGENDA ITEM

TITLE RESOLUTION NUMBER

A CALL TO ORDER 4

B ROLL CALL4

C ADOPTION OF MINUTES 4

D SPECIAL ITEMS 4

1 Airport Disclosure Policies and Procedures Training 4

E ITEMS INITIATED BY COMMISSIONERS 9

F ACTION ITEMS RELATING TO ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS amp MAINTENANCE 10

2 Award Contract No 1121151 for Shared Use Passenger Processing System Support Services SITA Information Networking Computing USA Inc $9966543 10

3 Approval of a Trial Program with Briggo Inc for Installation and Operation of Robotic Espresso Vending Machines 14

4 Approval of Phase D (Establish Final Guaranteed Maximum Price) to Contract No 1051176 Design‐Build Services for the Airport Security Infrastructure Program Hunt Construction Group Inc $11194143 17

No 18‐0356 17

5 Approval of Phase D (Establish Final Guaranteed Maximum Price) to Contract No 903466 Design‐Build Services for the Demolition of Terminal 2 Air Traffic Control Tower Project Turner Construction Company $4484042 19

No 18‐0357 19

No 18‐0358 20

No 18‐0359 21

No 18‐0360 22

No 18‐0361 22

No 18‐0362 23

No 18‐0363 23

No 18‐0364 23

H NEW BUSINESS 24

I CORRESPONDENCE 30

J CLOSED SESSION 30

K ADJOURNMENT 31

Discussion only

m110618

m110618 Attachment

No 18‐0359 21

No 18‐0360 22

No 18‐0361 22

No 18‐0362 23

No 18‐0363 23

No 18‐0364 23

H NEW BUSINESS 24

I CORRESPONDENCE 30

J CLOSED SESSION 30

K ADJOURNMENT 31

Discussion only

m110618

m110618 Attachment

Discussion only

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

m110618

m110618 Attachment

Documents

MINUTES - Amazon Web Servicesmedia.flysfo.com.s3.amazonaws.com/media/sfo/about-sfo/...itemor this agenda item, Dan Deaton. Danis a partner in the public finance group at Nixon PeabodyLLP,