16
Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety

Improving Regulation Discussion

Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Page 2: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

Learning

Systems

Workplace

Fairness

Values and Culture

System

Design

Behavioral

Choices

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

EventsAn organization with a culture of safety places less focus on events, errors, and outcomes, and more focus on risk, system design, and the management of behavioral choices. In this model, errors and adverse events are the outputs to be monitored; system design and the behavioral choices are the inputs to be managed and measured.

Page 3: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

How Do We Measure a Regulator’s Success?

Page 4: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

• Effectiveness in:– Identifying risk– Mitigating risk or influencing risk

management

• Efficiency– Resources required to protect our

value(s)

Two Primary Measures

Measures of Regulatory Success

Page 5: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

• Accidents / sentinel events / adverse outcomes

• Near misses / close calls• Inspector surveillance• Digital surveillance• External reporting by:

– Operators– Individuals– Public

• Predictive methodologies

How Do Regulators Learn About Risk in:

• Systems?

•Behaviors?

•Culture?

Page 6: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

“Seeing” Socio-Technical Risk

How Do Regulators Learn About Risk in:

• Systems?

• Behaviors?

• Culture?

Page 7: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

Learning

Systems

Workplace

Fairness

Values and Culture

System

Design

Behavioral

Choices

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

Page 8: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

Learning

Systems

Workplace

Fairness

Values and Culture

System

Design

Behavioral

Choices

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

Managing Socio-Technical RiskWhat the Regulator “Sees”

Page 9: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

Learning

Systems

Workplace

Fairness

Values and Culture

System

Design

Behavioral

Choices

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

Managing Socio-Technical RiskWhat Cultural Surveys “See”

Page 10: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

Learning

Systems

Workplace

Fairness

Values and Culture

System

Design

Behavioral

Choices

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

The Key Window for the Manager

Page 11: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

Learning

Systems

Workplace

Fairness

Values and Culture

System

Design

Behavioral

Choices

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

Managing Socio-Technical RiskA Better View

Page 12: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

Learning

Systems

Workplace

Fairness

Values and Culture

System

Design

Behavioral

Choices

Human ErrorNear Misses

Adverse

Events

“Seeing” the Entire Pyramid

Page 13: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

.• A Change in Focus:– From outcomes and errors– To system design and behavioral choices

Organizations produce outcomes:

To do this, they must design good systems and help employees make

good choices

Individuals participate as components:

To do this, they must make good behavioral choices within the

system

Page 14: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Aviation Safety Action Partnerships (ASAPs) have demonstrated that less than 1% of the

risks identified through these programs would have been known to the FAA outside

these programs

Identifying Risk through PartnershipsAviation Safety Action Partnerships (ASAPs)

Benefits:• More effective oversight by the regulator• Improved regulatory compliance• Better outcomes for the consumer• Better outcomes for the public

Page 15: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

“When your only tool is a hammer, you tend to see every

problem as a nail.”

-- Abraham Maslow

Page 16: Minnesota Alliance for Patient Safety Improving Regulation Discussion Operations Committee January 7, 2014

Next Steps For MAPS?• Facilitated forum/Outside speaker– Board?– MAPS members?– Plus regulators/agencies? – Open to all? – Combination of above

• Pilot – Provider organization + regulator partnership (a la ASAP

or North Carolina BoN)?• Support for specific proposals – topic expertise