81
MicroRNA titration by pseudo-targets Introduction An alternative hypothesis Testing the hypothesis miRNA quantification mRNA quantification Relative abundance of miRNAs and mRNAs Conclusion Supplementary data MicroRNA titration by pseudo-targets: an alternative explanation to seed match conservation Herv´ e Seitz IGH (CNRS), Montpellier, France February 2, 2014

MicroRNA titration by pseudo-targets: an alternative ... · PDF filetitration by pseudo-targets Introduction An alternative hypothesis ... miRNA quanti cation mRNA quanti cation Relative

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

MicroRNA titration by pseudo-targets: analternative explanation to seed match

conservation

Herve Seitz

IGH (CNRS), Montpellier, France

February 2, 2014

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

microRNA target identification

.

||||||NNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNN

5´ 3´miRNA:

target:

2 7

−→ the “seed”

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

microRNA target identification

.

||||||NNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNN

5´ 3´miRNA:

target:

2 7

−→ the “seed”

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

microRNA target identification

Computational programs for target prediction: look for seedmatches in 3´ UTRs, select the ones that were conserved inevolution.

Such short matches are very frequent (60 % of humancoding genes seem to be targeted: Friedman et al., 2009).

=⇒ miRNAs are implicated in every physiological process inanimals.

miRNA-mediated repression is very modest (usually< 2-fold): lower than well tolerated fluctuations in geneexpression (e.g., haplosufficiency). Why have these sitesbeen conserved if they are not functional?

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

microRNA target identification

Computational programs for target prediction: look for seedmatches in 3´ UTRs, select the ones that were conserved inevolution.

Such short matches are very frequent (60 % of humancoding genes seem to be targeted: Friedman et al., 2009).

=⇒ miRNAs are implicated in every physiological process inanimals.

miRNA-mediated repression is very modest (usually< 2-fold): lower than well tolerated fluctuations in geneexpression (e.g., haplosufficiency). Why have these sitesbeen conserved if they are not functional?

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

microRNA target identification

Computational programs for target prediction: look for seedmatches in 3´ UTRs, select the ones that were conserved inevolution.

Such short matches are very frequent (60 % of humancoding genes seem to be targeted: Friedman et al., 2009).

=⇒ miRNAs are implicated in every physiological process inanimals.

miRNA-mediated repression is very modest (usually< 2-fold): lower than well tolerated fluctuations in geneexpression (e.g., haplosufficiency). Why have these sitesbeen conserved if they are not functional?

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

microRNA target identification

Computational programs for target prediction: look for seedmatches in 3´ UTRs, select the ones that were conserved inevolution.

Such short matches are very frequent (60 % of humancoding genes seem to be targeted: Friedman et al., 2009).

=⇒ miRNAs are implicated in every physiological process inanimals.

miRNA-mediated repression is very modest (usually< 2-fold): lower than well tolerated fluctuations in geneexpression (e.g., haplosufficiency). Why have these sitesbeen conserved if they are not functional?

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

An alternative hypothesis

microRNA

mRNA

mRNA

.

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

An alternative hypothesis

.

mRNA

mRNA

microRNA

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

An alternative hypothesis

pseudo−target (insensitive)

real target (sensitive)

mRNA

mRNA

microRNA

.

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

For mRNAs to titrate miRNAs, they need to be abundantenough. Issues with published examples

Murine cell line “C2C12”: differentiate in myotubes;expresses muscle-specific miR-1, miR-206 and miR-133.

miR-1 and miR-206 (at least) control C2C12 differentiation(Goljanek-Whysall et al., 2012).

=⇒ quantification of miR-1, miR-206, miR-133 and theirpredicted targets in differentiating C2C12.

I miRNAs: Northern blot (calibrated with RNA oligos);

I mRNAs: RNA-Seq (calibrated with in vitro transcripts).

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

For mRNAs to titrate miRNAs, they need to be abundantenough. Issues with published examples

Murine cell line “C2C12”: differentiate in myotubes;expresses muscle-specific miR-1, miR-206 and miR-133.

miR-1 and miR-206 (at least) control C2C12 differentiation(Goljanek-Whysall et al., 2012).

=⇒ quantification of miR-1, miR-206, miR-133 and theirpredicted targets in differentiating C2C12.

I miRNAs: Northern blot (calibrated with RNA oligos);

I mRNAs: RNA-Seq (calibrated with in vitro transcripts).

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

For mRNAs to titrate miRNAs, they need to be abundantenough. Issues with published examples

Murine cell line “C2C12”: differentiate in myotubes;expresses muscle-specific miR-1, miR-206 and miR-133.

miR-1 and miR-206 (at least) control C2C12 differentiation(Goljanek-Whysall et al., 2012).

=⇒ quantification of miR-1, miR-206, miR-133 and theirpredicted targets in differentiating C2C12.

I miRNAs: Northern blot (calibrated with RNA oligos);

I mRNAs: RNA-Seq (calibrated with in vitro transcripts).

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

For mRNAs to titrate miRNAs, they need to be abundantenough. Issues with published examples

Murine cell line “C2C12”: differentiate in myotubes;expresses muscle-specific miR-1, miR-206 and miR-133.

miR-1 and miR-206 (at least) control C2C12 differentiation(Goljanek-Whysall et al., 2012).

=⇒ absolute quantification of miR-1, miR-206, miR-133 andtheir predicted targets in differentiating C2C12.

I miRNAs: Northern blot (calibrated with RNA oligos);

I mRNAs: RNA-Seq (calibrated with in vitro transcripts).

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

For mRNAs to titrate miRNAs, they need to be abundantenough. Issues with published examples

Murine cell line “C2C12”: differentiate in myotubes;expresses muscle-specific miR-1, miR-206 and miR-133.

miR-1 and miR-206 (at least) control C2C12 differentiation(Goljanek-Whysall et al., 2012).

=⇒ absolute quantification of miR-1, miR-206, miR-133 andtheir predicted targets in differentiating C2C12.

I miRNAs: Northern blot (calibrated with RNA oligos);

I mRNAs: RNA-Seq (calibrated with in vitro transcripts).

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

For mRNAs to titrate miRNAs, they need to be abundantenough. Issues with published examples

Murine cell line “C2C12”: differentiate in myotubes;expresses muscle-specific miR-1, miR-206 and miR-133.

miR-1 and miR-206 (at least) control C2C12 differentiation(Goljanek-Whysall et al., 2012).

=⇒ absolute quantification of miR-1, miR-206, miR-133 andtheir predicted targets in differentiating C2C12.

I miRNAs: Northern blot (calibrated with RNA oligos);

I mRNAs: RNA-Seq (calibrated with in vitro transcripts).

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

For mRNAs to titrate miRNAs, they need to be abundantenough. Issues with published examples

Murine cell line “C2C12”: differentiate in myotubes;expresses muscle-specific miR-1, miR-206 and miR-133.

miR-1 and miR-206 (at least) control C2C12 differentiation(Goljanek-Whysall et al., 2012).

=⇒ absolute quantification of miR-1, miR-206, miR-133 andtheir predicted targets in differentiating C2C12.

I miRNAs: Northern blot (calibrated with RNA oligos);

I mRNAs: RNA-Seq (calibrated with in vitro transcripts).

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

miRNA quantification

M10.

5

2 4 8 15 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

fmol synthetic oligo days of differentiation

18

2123

38

nt:

(quantification of miR-1 and miR-206)

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

miRNA quantification

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

05000

10000

15000

20000

25000

miRNA abundance during C2C12 differentiation

Day of differentiation

miR

NA

mole

cule

s p

er

cell

miR−1 + miR−206

miR−133

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA quantification

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA quantification

Very deep sequencing: three time points (day 0, day 3, day6) in triplicate; each replicate: between 267 and 333 milliontranscriptome-matching reads. Statistics

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA quantification

Very deep sequencing: three time points (day 0, day 3, day6) in triplicate; each replicate: between 267 and 333 milliontranscriptome-matching reads. Statistics

27 synthetic spike-ins, for calibration.

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA quantification

0 2000 4000 6000 8000

01000

2000

3000

4000

Day 0, replicate 1

Molecules per cell

Read a

bundance (

fpkm

)

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA quantification

0 2000 4000 6000 8000

010

0020

0030

0040

00Day 0, replicate 1

Molecules per cell

Rea

dab

unda

nce

(fpkm

)

miR-1/miR-206 sitesmiR-133 sites

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA quantification

Day

Mol

ecul

espe

rcel

l

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

020

000

4000

060

000

8000

0

miR-1 + miR-206predicted targets

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA quantification

Day

Mol

ecul

espe

rcel

l

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

020

000

4000

060

000

8000

0

3.2-fold excessof targets

miR-1 + miR-206predicted targets

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA quantification

Day

Mol

ecul

espe

rcel

l

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

010

000

3000

050

000

miR-133predicted targets

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA quantification

Day

Mol

ecul

espe

rcel

l

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

010

000

3000

050

000

15.3-fold excessof targets

miR-133predicted targets

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Concentration effects

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Concentration effects

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Concentration effects

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Concentration effects

Predicted targetsmiRNA family Total Above 10×Kd

miR-1 and miR-206 436 31 (7 %)

miR-133 384 22 (6 %)

(Kd value taken from Wee et al., 2012: 26 pM)

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Concentration effects

Titration effect of individual miRNA binding sites:

mRNA Sample Increase in free miR-1/miR-206if site is lost

Anxa2 Day 0 8 %Ptma Day 0 9 %

Tmsb4x Day 0 10 %

Actb Day 3 15 %Tmsb4x Day 3 9 %

Actb Day 6 13 %Tmsb4x Day 6 11 %

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Concentration effects

Titration effect of individual miRNA binding sites:

mRNA Sample Increase in free miR-133if site is lost

Tpm4 Day 0 5 %Ptma Day 0 16 %Eif4a1 Day 0 5 %Tagln2 Day 0 6 %

Ptma Day 3 7 %Eef1a1 Day 3 8 %

Ptma Day 6 6 %Eef1a1 Day 6 6 %

Titrator expression profiles

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Conclusion

miRNA titration by mRNAs does occur.

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Conclusion

miRNA titration by mRNAs does occur.

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Conclusion

miRNA titration by mRNAs does occur.

Every cell where miR-1, miR-206, miR-133 titration isbeneficial may express a different set of miRNA titrators.

=⇒ It cannot be assumed that every conserved binding sitemediates functional target repression.

The number of miRNA targets has probably beenoverestimated.

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Conclusion

miRNA titration by mRNAs does occur.

Every cell where miR-1, miR-206, miR-133 titration isbeneficial may express a different set of miRNA titrators.

=⇒ It cannot be assumed that every conserved binding sitemediates functional target repression.

The number of miRNA targets has probably beenoverestimated.

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Conclusion

miRNA titration by mRNAs does occur.

Every cell where miR-1, miR-206, miR-133 titration isbeneficial may express a different set of miRNA titrators.

=⇒ It cannot be assumed that every conserved binding sitemediates functional target repression.

The number of miRNA targets has probably beenoverestimated.

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Conclusion

miRNA titration by mRNAs does occur.

Every cell where miR-1, miR-206, miR-133 titration isbeneficial may express a different set of miRNA titrators.

=⇒ It cannot be assumed that every conserved binding sitemediates functional target repression.

The number of miRNA targets has probably beenoverestimated.

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Acknowledgements

Anna Laura Natalia BlaiseSergeeva Martinez Pinzon Restrepo Li

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Acknowledgements

Anna Laura Natalia BlaiseSergeeva Martinez Pinzon Restrepo Li

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Supplementary data

An alternative hypothesis:Robustness of biological pathways

Non-discriminative predictions (coordinated targeting)

Non-discriminative predictions (expression domains)

Non-discriminative predictions (house-keeping genes)

Testing the hypothesis:RNA-seq technical reproducibility RNA-seq biological reproducibility

Issues with published examples Experimental procedure

Amount of RNA per cell Differentiation controls

Cell volume Sequencing depth

Titrator expression profiles Abundance vs. conservation

Conclusion:Pseudo-targets for other regulators?

Propagation of gene expression perturbation

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Biological robustness

Substrate Product 1 Product 2 Product 3enzyme 1 enzyme 2 enzyme 3

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Non-discriminative predictions

Targets for a given miRNA often belong to the samebiological pathways.

mRNA for gene 1

mRNA for gene 4

mRNA for gene 3

mRNA for gene 2

miRNA

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Non-discriminative predictions

Targets for a given miRNA often belong to the samebiological pathways.

mRNA for gene 1

mRNA for gene 4

mRNA for gene 3

mRNA for gene 2

miRNA

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Non-discriminative predictions

Expression domains for miRNAs and their predicted targetsoverlap at their boundaries.

sharp boundary ofmRNA activity domain

miRNA

mRNAmiRNA

spatial or temporal axis

expressionand mRNA

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Non-discriminative predictions

Expression domains for miRNAs and their predicted targetsoverlap at their boundaries.

sharp boundary ofmiRNA activity domain

miRNA

mRNA

miRNA

spatial or temporal axis

expressionmRNAand

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Non-discriminative predictions

House-keeping genes are rarely predicted to be targeted.

mRNA for house−keeping gene

mRNA for house−keeping gene

miRNA mRNA for tissue−specific gene

cell type 1

miRNA mRNA for tissue−specific gene

cell type 2

avoidance

avoidance

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Non-discriminative predictions

House-keeping genes are rarely predicted to be targeted.

mRNA for house−keeping gene

mRNA for house−keeping gene

miRNA

miRNA

mRNA for tissue−specific gene

cell type 2

mRNA for tissue−specific gene

cell type 1

avoidance

avoidance

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Technical reproducibility of RNA-seq

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Technical reproducibility of RNA-seq

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Technical reproducibility of RNA-seq

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Biological reproducibility of RNA-seq

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Biological reproducibility of RNA-seq

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Biological reproducibility of RNA-seq

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Reported examples of pseudo-targets

A proposed pseudo-target: PTENP1, that de-repressedPTEN (Poliseno et al., 2010).

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Reported examples of pseudo-targets

A proposed pseudo-target: PTENP1, that de-repressedPTEN (Poliseno et al., 2010).

But PTENP1 mRNA is ≈ 100 times less abundant than thePTEN mRNA (Ebert and Sharp, 2010).

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Reported examples of pseudo-targets

PTEN mRNA(NM_008960)

1 869 2080 8229nt:

CDS

siRNAs against PTENP1

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Reported examples of pseudo-targets

Proposed by Poliseno et al (2010):

PTENP1 mRNA

PTEN mRNA

siRNAs

miRNAs

More probably:

siRNAs

PTEN mRNA

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Reported examples of pseudo-targets

UAAUAAUCAUCAUUCUGGC |||||| ||| |||GUUAUUA----UAA-ACCU

5´ 3´

3´ 5´

siRNA #2 against PTENP1:

PTEN mRNA (nt 948-961):

UAAUAAUCAUCAUUCUGGC |||||| ||| :| |AUUAUUAUAUGUAUCGCGG

5´ 3´

3´ 5´PTEN mRNA (nt 1383-1401):

siRNA #2 against PTENP1:

UAAUAAUCAUCAUUCUGGC |||||| ||||AUUAUUACC-----GACCU

5´ 3´

3´ 5´PTEN mRNA (nt 3769-3782):

siRNA #2 against PTENP1:

UAAUAAUC-AUCAUUCUGGC |||||| |:| |::UUUAUUACUUGGAAAAAUUA

5´ 3´

3´ 5´PTEN mRNA (nt 8189-8208):

siRNA #2 against PTENP1:

UCCUAUA--UGAUCUCUGAUG |||||| || |||||::AGGAUAUUGACGUUAGACUGU

5´ 3´

3´ 5´PTEN mRNA (nt 2192-2212):

siRNA #3 against PTENP1:

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Reported examples of pseudo-targetssiRNAs against AFF1

PTEN mRNA(NM_008960)

1 869 2080 8229nt:

CDS

PTEN mRNA(NM_008960)

1 869 2080 8229nt:

CDS

siRNAs against CNOT6L

PTEN mRNA(NM_008960)

1 869 2080 8229nt:

CDS

siRNAs against DCBLD2

PTEN mRNA(NM_008960)

1 869 2080 8229nt:

CDS

siRNAs against JARID2

PTEN mRNA(NM_008960)

1 869 2080 8229nt:

CDS

siRNAs against MBNL1

PTEN mRNA(NM_008960)

1 869 2080 8229nt:

CDS

siRNAs against TNRC6b

siRNAs against RBM9

PTEN mRNA(NM_008960)

1 869 2080 8229nt:

CDS

PTEN mRNA(NM_008960)

1 869 2080 8229nt:

CDS

siRNAs against TNRC6a

PTEN mRNA(NM_008960)

1 869 2080 8229nt:

CDS

siRNAs against ZEB2

Return

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

C2C12 cells

0 to 6 days of differentiation

Amount of RNA per cell Return

Differentiation controls

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

C2C12 cells

0 to 6 days of differentiation

Flowcytometry

MicroscopyRNAextraction

Numberof cells

Cellvolume

miRNAand mRNA

quantification

Amount of RNA per cell Return

Differentiation controls

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

C2C12 cells

0 to 6 days of differentiation

Flowcytometry

MicroscopyRNAextraction

Numberof cells

Cellvolume

miRNAand mRNA

quantification

Amount of RNA per cell Return

Differentiation controls

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

C2C12 cells

0 to 6 days of differentiation

Flowcytometry

MicroscopyRNAextraction

Numberof cells

Cellvolume

miRNAand mRNA

quantification

Amount of RNA per cell Return

Differentiation controls

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

C2C12 cells

0 to 6 days of differentiation

Flowcytometry

MicroscopyRNAextraction

Numberof cells

Cellvolume

miRNAand mRNA

quantification

(three biological replicates)

Amount of RNA per cell Return

Differentiation controls

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Absolute RNA quantification

Number of cells

Qua

ntity

ofR

NA

(µg)

Day 0Day 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6

050

100

150

200

250

300

0 0.5×107 1×107 1.5×107 2×107

Return

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Differentiation controls

Myogenin

Days

Exp

ressio

n (

fpkm

)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

05

01

00

15

02

00

25

03

00

Myosin heavy chain polypeptide 1

Days

Exp

ressio

n (

fpkm

)

0 1 2 3 4 5 60

10

20

30

40

50

Return

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Cell volume

Cel

l vol

ume

(μm

3 )

Day 0 Day 3 Day 6

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

(calibrationproblem)

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Deep-sequencing statistics

Number of reads per kb (median transcript, excludingspike-ins):

Replicate 1 159.26Day 0 Replicate 2 140.53

Replicate 3 150.03

Replicate 1 213.09Day 3 Replicate 2 167.77

Replicate 3 198.48

Replicate 1 223.57Day 6 Replicate 2 243.86

Replicate 3 220.23

Return

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Concentration effects

Day

Intra

cellu

larc

once

ntra

tion

(mol

/L)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

0.0e

+00

1.0e

−08

2.0e

−08

Kd

miR-1 + miR-206Tmsb4x mRNA

Return

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Concentration effects

Day

Intra

cellu

larc

once

ntra

tion

(mol

/L)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

0.0e

+00

1.0e

−09

2.0e

−09

3.0e

−09

Kd

miR-133Tpm4 mRNA

Return

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA abundance and seed match conservation

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Kendall's τ = 0.0873(p-value = 1.18 10 )-8

Gene expression in hypothalamus

CT

Con

serv

atio

n sc

ore

(P

)of

bin

ding

site

s to

miR

-17

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA abundance and seed match conservationA

djus

ted p-

valu

e

Hypothalamus

Kendall's τ-0.25 -0.1 0 0.1 0.25

1

10-4

10-8

10-12

10-16

Adj

uste

d p-

valu

e

Spleen

Kendall's τ-0.25 -0.1 0 0.1 0.25

1

10-4

10-8

10-12

10-16

Adj

uste

d p-

valu

e

Naïve B cells

Kendall's τ-0.25 -0.1 0 0.1 0.25

1

10-4

10-8

10-12

10-16

Adj

uste

d p-

valu

e

Kidney

Kendall's τ-0.25 -0.1 0 0.1 0.25

1

10-4

10-8

10-12

10-16

Adj

uste

d p-

valu

e

ES cells

Kendall's τ-0.25 -0.1 0 0.1 0.25

1

10-4

10-8

10-12

10-16

Adj

uste

d p-

valu

e

Ovary

Kendall's τ-0.25 -0.1 0 0.1 0.25

1

10-4

10-8

10-12

10-16

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

mRNA abundance and seed match conservation

LiverA

djus

ted p-

valu

e

Kendall's τ

1

10-4

10-8

10-12

10-16

-0.3 -0.1 0 0.1 0.3

miR-150miR-138

miR-181amiR-133a

miR-124

miR-9

miR-1a

miR-122

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Pseudo-targets for other regulators?

I Transcription factors: experimentally identified bindingsites are poorly conserved among vertebrates (Odom etal., 2007 and Schmidt et al., 2010).

I RNA-binding proteins are poorly specific (thousands ofexperimentally validated targets for each analyzedprotein: Hafner et al., 2010 and Lebedeva et al., 2011).

Real molecular events, which are neutral in evolutionaryterms?

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Pseudo-targets for other regulators?

I Transcription factors: experimentally identified bindingsites are poorly conserved among vertebrates (Odom etal., 2007 and Schmidt et al., 2010).

I RNA-binding proteins are poorly specific (thousands ofexperimentally validated targets for each analyzedprotein: Hafner et al., 2010 and Lebedeva et al., 2011).

Real molecular events, which are neutral in evolutionaryterms?

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Pseudo-targets for other regulators?

I Transcription factors: experimentally identified bindingsites are poorly conserved among vertebrates (Odom etal., 2007 and Schmidt et al., 2010).

I RNA-binding proteins are poorly specific (thousands ofexperimentally validated targets for each analyzedprotein: Hafner et al., 2010 and Lebedeva et al., 2011).

Real molecular events, which are neutral in evolutionaryterms?

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Propagation of gene expression perturbation

+

Gene X

Gene Y1

Gene Y3

Gene Y2

Direct miRNA target Indirect miRNA targets

Gene Z1

Gene Z3

Gene Z2

Gene Z4

Gene Z6

Gene Z5

Gene Z7

Gene Z9

Gene Z8

miRNA

MicroRNAtitration by

pseudo-targets

Introduction

An alternativehypothesis

Testing thehypothesis

miRNA quantification

mRNA quantification

Relative abundance ofmiRNAs and mRNAs

Conclusion

Supplementarydata

Propagation of gene expression perturbation

Direct targets13.5 dpp

Indirect targetsat 13.5 dpp

Indirect targetsat 15.5 dpp

|log

2(fo

ld-c

hang

e)|

(blu

e bo

xplo

t)

Num

ber

of a

ffect

ed g

enes

(red

line

)

0

2

4

6

8

10

0

500

1000

1500

Zfy overexpression

Pebp4

Tsarg2 MiwiSept12

(in collaboration with H. Royo and J. Turner, MRC, London)